LSSIP 2020 - DENMARK LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Denmark Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/59 Date of Edition 29/04/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Bo Feldberg - [email protected] - Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority LSSIP Contact Person Igor Marcetic - [email protected] EUROCONTROL/NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://aim.naviair.dk/ FAB Performance Plan https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/globalassets/global/luftfart/flygtrafiktjan st/danish-swedish-performance-plan.pdf LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. Stakeholder / Name Position Signature and date Organisation Danish Civil Aviation Kåre Deputy Director and Railway Authority Clemmesen General Air Command Henrik Hegner Colonel Chief of Denmark Nielsen Capabilities Division LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 11 1. National ATM Environment .......................................................... 12 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................. 12 National Stakeholders .......................................................................................... 14 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 21 Evolution of traffic in Denmark ........................................................................... 21 ACC Copenhagen .................................................................................................. 22 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 25 National projects .................................................................................................. 25 FAB projects .......................................................................................................... 26 Multinational projects .......................................................................................... 26 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 28 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................ 28 Multinational cooperation initiatives.................................................................. 28 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 33 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress .................................. 33 Objective Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes.......................... 34 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress ................................................................. 40 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................... 45 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 68 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Denmark ........ 68 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ......................................................... 69 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with other plans ........................................... 71 D. Glossary of abbreviations .................................................................................... 76 LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: Main national stakeholders: - Danish Transport, Construction and Housing Authority – the CAA; - Naviair – the Danish ATS Service Provider (ANSP); - Københavns Lufthavne A/S - Copenhagen Airport / CPH; - The military authorities (Defence Command Air Command Denmark); - Accident Investigation Board Denmark - Havarikommissionen (AIB) Main airport covered by LSSIP: Københavns Lufthavne (EKCH) A/S | Lufthavnsboulevarden 6, DK 2770 Kastrup | https://www.cph.dk/ LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 1 Released Issue Traffic and Capacity Traffic growth in 2020 vs 2019 for Denmark is negative. The average en-route delay per flight (minutes per flight) is 0.0 at Copenhagen ACC. -59% 0.00 2020 2019 2020 20 Denmark is part of: The DK-SE Functional Airspace Block: Implementation Projects Number of national projects: 5 Number of FAB projects: 3 Number of multinational projects: 6 Summary of 2020 developments: The graph below shows progress for all Implementation Objectives (applicable and not applicable to the State). 2; [4%] 3; [5%] 6; [11%] Completed 2; [4%] Ongoing Planned Late 31; [54%] Not yet planned 13; [23%] Not Applicable Compared to LSSIP 2019 the overall situation has improved. Five more completed objectives, three more ongoing, one more planned, two more late and five less not yet planned. The total number of applicable objectives is reduced by one. LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non-PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2020, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE” LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for Denmark is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, AOP17, AOP18, ATC02.9, ATC19, ATC20, NAV12 and COM11.2. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 91% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2025 70% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 27% LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 3 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Essential Operational Changes and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Essential Operational Changes, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per EOC, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ATM 100 % Interconnected 0 % Network 65 % Airport and TMA 98 % performance 0 % 27 % CNS Infrastructure 93 % and Services 83 % 92 % Digital AIM and 12 % MET Services Fully Dynamic and 100 % Optimised Airspace 93 % Multimodal Mobility and 70 % integration of all Airspace Users Trajectory Based 100 % Operations 55 % Virtualisation of Service Provision 15 % 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Pre-SESAR Phase SESAR 1 (PCP only) SESAR 1 (non -PCP) LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 4 Released Issue ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2030 92% Block 1 2009 2030 67% Block 2 2013 2030 21% Block 3 2018 2025 7% LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 5 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2019 - 2020 - RNAV 1 in TMA Operations NAV03.1 - 100 % progress - New Pan-European Network Service (NewPENS) COM12 - 100 % progress By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - Initial ATC Air-Ground Data - RNP 1 in TMA Operations - RNP Approach Procedures Link Services NAV03.2 - 66 % progress to instrument RWY ITY-AGDL - 91 % progress - Electronic Terrain and NAV10 - 74 % progress - Voice over Internet Obstacle Data (eTOD) - ATS IFR Routes for Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route INF07 - 08 % progress Rotorcraft Operations COM11.1 - 92 % progress - Ensure Quality of NAV12 - 70 % progress - Aircraft Identification Aeronautical Data and - Information Exchanges ITY-ACID - 92 % progress Aeronautical Information using the SWIM Yellow TI - Interactive Rolling NOP ITY-ADQ - 17 % progress Profile FCM05 - 94 % progress - Short Term ATFCM INF08.1 - 07 % progress - Enhanced STCA with down- Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 linked parameters via Mode FCM04.2 - 05 % progress S EHS - ASM Management of Real- ATC20 - 10 % progress Time Airspace Data - Voice over Internet AOM19.2 - 70 % progress Protocol (VoIP) in Airport/Terminal COM11.2 - 83 % progress - Surveillance Performance and Interoperability ITY-SPI - 100 % progress LSSIP Year 2020 Denmark 6 Released Issue Airport Objectives - Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Deployed in 2019 - 2020 None By 2021 By 2022 By 2023 By 2024+ - Initial Airport Operations - Automated Assistance to Plan Controller for Surface AOP11 - 83 % progress Movement