DOCSLIB.ORG

School Games Kitemark - Final Report - Year 2 (2012-13)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

____________________________________________________________ School Games Kitemark - Final Report - Year 2 (2012-13) December 2013 ____________________________________________________________ Submitted to: Natasha O'Flaherty Sport England Submitted by: Sport Industry Research Centre Sheffield Hallam University A118 Collegiate Hall Collegiate Crescent Sheffield S10 2BP (0114) 225 5919 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. ii 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 2 THE SELECTION OF SCHOOLS FOR INDEPENDENT VALIDATION .............. 2 2.1 The Validation Process ..................................................................................... 3 3 THE COHORT OF KITEMARK SCHOOLS ......................................................... 4 3.1 Headlines ...................................................................................................... 4 3.2 The validation process in greater detail ......................................................... 5 3.3 Outcomes of the independent validation process.......................................... 6 3.4 2012-13 school year compared with 2011-12 ............................................... 8 3.5 Concluding comments ................................................................................... 9 4 KEY ISSUES ..................................................................................................... 10 4.1 SGO Engagement with Kitemarking ............................................................ 10 4.2 Causes of failure ......................................................................................... 15 4.3 Potential for Progression ............................................................................. 17 4.4 Driving Volume ............................................................................................ 19 4.4.1 SGO Work plans ................................................................................... 19 4.4.2 Changes to Kitemark Criteria ................................................................ 21 4.4.3 Longer term considerations to the criteria............................................. 22 5 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSION ......................................................... 23 APPENDICES .......................................................................................................... 25 Appendix 1: The list of 300 schools validated ....................................................... 25 Appendix 2: The validation pro-forma ................................................................... 31 Appendix 3: Colour coded rating of schools against criteria ................................. 38 Appendix 4: Reasons for 'failure' at higher levels of award ................................... 42 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kitemark award scheme is administered by the Youth Sport Trust and enables schools in England to assess themselves against various criteria to achieve a Bronze, Silver or Gold award. The second year of the validation programme (2012-13) took the form of a fully independent validation process. Applications There are 23,109 schools and colleges in England eligible to apply for a Kitemark award (as long as they have activated School Games accounts), of which 67% are primary schools; 14% are secondary schools and 19% are in other categories. Activated accounts with the School Games website stood at 15,318 at the end of the 2012-13 school year, an increase of 84% (8,321) on the previous school year. All activated schools have the opportunity to apply for a School Games Kitemark award and in the 2012-13 school year 2,762 (or 18% of activated schools) made an application, of which 84% were successful in their online applications and 16% were unsuccessful. The independent validation programme saw the validation of 300 schools across 150 SGO areas. The validation visits revealed that 94% provided satisfactory evidence to support an award and 6% did not and consequently failed. SGO engagement A relatively small percentage of SGOs generate a disproportionately high number of award applications. Of the 451 SGO regions in England, 379 (84%) submitted at least one Kitemark application and the remaining 72 (16%) made no applications at all. This was a noticeable improvement on the 2011-12 school year in which it was found that 64% of SGOs made at least one application. Key points SGO engagement with Kitemarking has improved in 2012-13 relative to 2011-12 with 84% of SGOs now making at least one Kitemark award application. Some SGOs are more productive in Kitemarking applications than others, the bottom 25% generate 4% of all applications whereas the top 25% generate 58%. There are significant differences between Local Organising Committee (LOC) areas in terms of schools activated, applications made and success rate. There are also significantly different levels of engaged SGOs within LOC areas with scores averaging 84% but ranging from 50% to 100%. Causes of failure Key Points Almost all schools that failed (99%+) were unable to answer one or more of the four Bronze level questions positively, with only one school failing on a prerequisite. A sizeable majority (76%) of failed schools did so on one criterion only and the remaining 24% failed on a combination of criteria. The most common reasons for failure were insufficient provision of sports at Level 1 (51%) and under achieving the criterion for 5% of pupils being involved in leading, managing and officiating sport (39%). Potential for schools to progress to a higher level of award Key Points There is potential for schools which currently hold awards to make progression in the future although some criteria will be more difficult to achieve than others. Notable sticking points include meeting the criteria for the requisite number of B and C teams, as well as involving pupils in leading, managing and officiating sport. Different types of school will face different challenges in order to progress. Most of the 100 upgrades made to the sample of 300 independently validated schools could be explained by errors on the application form against one or two criteria. It is clear SGOs have an important role in helping schools to plan for progression. Criteria changes and future applications The most significant change to the criteria is to the prerequisite that all schools applying for a Kitemark award should offer pupils at least two hours of PE during curriculum time each week. Feedback from SGOs suggested that this pre-requisite was often stopping schools from applying for the Kitemark award as some schools do not provide 2 hours of PE during curriculum time each week. In 2013-14, for the Bronze award schools that have an aspiration to provide 2 hours of PE can apply; at the Silver level 2 hours of PE should be provided to all pupils but this could be made up through a mix of curricular and extracurricular activity; and, for Gold level schools the 2 hours of PE during curriculum time only would remain in place. It is anticipated that this change will assist in driving up the number of applications for a Kitemark award in future years. Key points It is likely that the volume of applications for Kitemark awards will increase in the next year for two key reasons: 1) Engaging with the Kitemark award process has been built into SGOs’ work plans and early indications from the SGO annual delivery plans show that volume could grow by 146% to over 6,000 applications in 2013-14. 2) Changes to the criteria may remove barriers that have acted as a deterrent to applications in the past. Further thought is already being given to how the criteria can be improved in the future to make the Kitemark award more accessible and relevant to schools. 1 INTRODUCTION The Kitemark award scheme is administered by the Youth Sport Trust and enables schools in England to assess themselves against various criteria to achieve a Bronze, Silver or Gold award. Schools are able to apply for the award on an annual basis and awards are renewable annually. This report focuses on the independent validation of the programme, which was conducted by the Sport Industry Research Centre (SIRC) between June and December 2013. In 2011-12 there were 1,659 applications for a Kitemark award, the validation programme for this period followed a retrospective approach and covered 100 schools across 72 School Games Organiser (SGO) areas. This inaugural validation programme aimed to assess the robustness of the award scheme as well as providing key learning and intelligence to improve the programme for the 2012-13 academic year. The second year of the validation programme (2012-13) took the form of a fully independent validation. Those schools which were selected for validation did not have their award confirmed until their validation visit had taken place and the evidence to support their applications had been reviewed. The application window for schools to apply for a Kitemark award for the 2012-13 period was open for almost four months (from Monday 3rd June 2013 to Friday 27th September 2013). During this period 2,762 schools (18% of those with activated accounts on the School Games website as of 27th September 2013) applied for a Kitemark award, of which 84% were successful in their online applications. This is an increase of 67% in applications compared with the 2011-12 academic year. The independent validation programme for the 2012-13 academic year commenced
Recommended publications
  • Transfer From

    Transfer From

    TRANSFER FROM PRIMARY TO SECONDARY SCHOOl Information for parents September 2022 email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION This information booklet is aimed at the parents of children currently in Year 5 who will become eligible from 12th September 2021 to make their secondary applications for Year 7 places starting in September 2022. This information booklet outlines what will happen and gives you guidance about how you can get more information about schools and advice about how to apply for school places. From 12th September you are then able to make your school preferences application at liverpool.gov.uk/admissions where there is further information and guidance posted online. CHOOSING A SCHOOL The Liverpool city council website includes the composite prospectus admissions information spread across its webpages at liverpool.gov.uk/admissions This includes important information about how to apply to schools; what criteria are used to allocate places if a school gets more applications than it has places available and how places were allocated in the previous year. Before expressing a preference for a school it is important that you understand the school’s admission policy and know whether or not the school was oversubscribed in the previous year. By using this information you can assess your child’s chances of gaining a place in the school. In addition to the composite prospectus admissions information online at liverpool.gov.uk/admissions there are several other sources of information that you can use to find out more about schools, these include the following: • School Open Evenings. (Please see Open Evening section within this booklet for further details) • School websites • School Admissions Team (Contact details can be found in the Contact Points section in this information booklet).
  • Factsheet United Kingdom

    Factsheet United Kingdom

    Insight into the current situation United Kingdom About SEDY United Kingdom There has been much policy interest in the UK surrounding participation in sport The SEDY project aims to contribute to to include young disabled people. In 2000, the British government developed a the increase of physical activity in strategy called the ‘White Paper: A Sporting Future for all’, this highlighted the children with disabilities. This is achieved benefi ts of sport for young disabled people. by matching the demand and the supply. We are convinced that the participation According to the Census for England and Wales (2011), 374,797 young people in of children in sport activities contributes England aged 0-15 years old had a health problem or disability that limited them a to the social, emotional and physical lot or a little in their day to day activities. This equated to 3.7% of the population. development of children. The project runs In Northern Ireland, data is only available for young people aged 16 years and from 2015 until 2017. In this period we above. The Continuous Household Survey for Northern Ireland (CHSNI) (2013) expect to obtain more knowledge of the found that in 2012/13, 10% of young people aged 16-25 years old were disabled. level of fi t, between demand and supply However, it is important to note that the survey was only based on responses in sport and the best ways to support from 323 young people aged 16-25 years old. disabled children. The fi nal goal is to increase sport participation of children with disabilities, and thereby to increase the social inclusion of this group.
  • Elmsley Brochure ARTWORK AMENDED.Indd

    Elmsley Brochure ARTWORK AMENDED.Indd

    the elmsley development is a Rare Opportunity to purchase land in the affluent suburb of Mossley Hill, Liverpool. Liverpool is currently enjoying a renaissance schools, shops, restaurants and cafes. Churches of various denominations are close train station is also nearby which offers and is today a vibrant, multi-cultural Sporting facilities including an LA Fitness by along with Sudley House (a National the same routes and additional ones to European City receiving millions of visitors gym are nearby. Mossley Hill is part of Museums Liverpool property ) and various Yorkshire, Newcastle, Birmingham New each year attracted by the wide variety of the Trans Pennine cycle route number 56. well known Beatles sites including Strawberry Street and London Euston. John Lennon museums, art galleries, shopping facilities, Many doctors, dentists and pharmacies Fields and Penny Lane’s famous barber’s Airport is an International airport providing restaurants, bars and sporting events. are located in the area along with the shop within a few minutes’ walk away. routes to many European cities and is new Sir Alfred Jones Memorial Hospital 6 miles from Mossley Hill. The M62 Mossley Hill is a wealthy, leafy, tranquil (NHS) and Spire Liverpool Private Hospital. Transport links are ideal with Mossley Hill motorway begins in South Liverpool and suburb of south Liverpool, approximately Liverpool’s largest park, Sefton Park and train station close by, which offers direct travels across the Pennines to Hull; it 4 miles from the City Centre. The area other smaller parks are within walking services to Liverpool, Warrington and also links into other motorway networks comprises numerous local nurseries, distance of Elmsley development.
  • Im Marsh Campus Site Aigburth Vision Document (Nov 2018) 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 3

    Im Marsh Campus Site Aigburth Vision Document (Nov 2018) 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 2 Im Marsh Campus Ljmu, Aigburth Vision Document 3

    Appendix 1 Site Vision Document – I.M Marsh Campus IM MARSH CAMPUS SITE AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT (NOV 2018) 2 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT 2 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT 3 CONTENTS Executive Summary........................................................................ 04 Understanding the Site................................................................... 06 Sustainable Location...................................................................... 08 Unique Design Opportunity............................................................ 10 Deliverable Phasing Strategy........................................................... 12 Steps to Delivery............................................................................. 14 4 IM MARSH CAMPUS LJMU, AIGBURTH VISION DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Figure 2: Site Location Plan Liverpool John Moores University’s (LJMU’s) campus at IM Marsh presents a unique regeneration opportunity. It should be redeveloped for high quality housing. This will respond to a critical need in South Liverpool. Housing use will enable the beneficial use of the listed building and redevelopment of City Campus (LJMU) the remainder of the site provides an opportunity to deliver high quality apartment development alongside large family housing, including 4 and 5 bedroom properties with gardens. The IM Marsh Campus comprises various university buildings, that range in age and quality, and three sports pitches. The buildings on the Site will be surplus to academic requirements, following the planned transfer of faculties to the Copperas Hill site in the City Centre. The buildings are relatively low quality both visually and physically, apart from two historic buildings. The previously developed land on the Site represents c.50% of the total Site area. The remaining Site area comprises sports pitches which LJMU are currently developing a strategy to relocate near to the City Centre Campus. These planned improvements are part of LJMU’s wider vision to deliver a walkable campus within Liverpool City Centre.
  • Was Glasgow 2014 Inspirational? Exploring the Legacy Impacts of a Mega-Sport Event Via the Theorized Demonstration and Festival Effects

    Was Glasgow 2014 Inspirational? Exploring the Legacy Impacts of a Mega-Sport Event Via the Theorized Demonstration and Festival Effects

    Sport in Society Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics ISSN: 1743-0437 (Print) 1743-0445 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fcss20 Was Glasgow 2014 inspirational? Exploring the legacy impacts of a mega-sport event via the theorized demonstration and festival effects Claire Lyne Cleland, Anne Ellaway, Julie Clark & Ade Kearns To cite this article: Claire Lyne Cleland, Anne Ellaway, Julie Clark & Ade Kearns (2019): Was Glasgow 2014 inspirational? Exploring the legacy impacts of a mega-sport event via the theorized demonstration and festival effects, Sport in Society, DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2019.1571044 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1571044 © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 10 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 187 View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=fcss20 SPORT IN SOCIETY https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2019.1571044 Was Glasgow 2014 inspirational? Exploring the legacy impacts of a mega-sport event via the theorized demonstration and festival effects Claire Lyne Clelanda,b, Anne Ellawayb, Julie Clarkc and Ade Kearnsd aCentre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK; bMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; cSchool of Media, Culture and Society, University of the West of Scotland, Hamilton, UK; dUrban Studies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The potential legacy of mega-sport events to increase physical activity Sport; physical activity; and sports participation among the host community has been recog- legacy; demonstration nized.
  • Interscholastic Rules & Regulations 2015

    Interscholastic Rules & Regulations 2015

    Interscholastic Rules & Regulations 2015 - 2016 Georgia Independent School Association, Inc. Post Office Box 1057 Thomaston, GA 30286-0013 Tel: (706) 938-1400 Fax: (706) 938-1401 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Site: www.gisaschools.org 1 GISA RECENT RULE CHANGES In this volume of the GISA Interscholastic Rules & Regulations rules changes will be noted in RED. In WORD format - CTRL+CLICK on Pg/Section to jump to Rule STUDENT ELIGIBILITY: [Pg. 12] Section 1 # 2: Students are allowed only one year of varsity eligibility as an 8th grade student. (Students are not allowed to repeat the 8th grade and retain varsity eligibility during the second year as an 8th grade student.) [Pg. 14] Section 1 # 13: Students who are ruled ineligible for GISA competitions are prohibited from representing a GISA school in any varsity contest regardless of opponent. RULES COMPLIANCE: [Pg. 17] Section 2 # 10: Clinic attendance or rules tests are required of all varsity and assistant varsity football, basketball, baseball, softball, soccer, volleyball, and head track coaches at either the Annual Coaches' Clinic and/or GISA clinics (officially sponsored and conducted by GISA approved and registered officials associations). GISA and/or the Coaches’ Association will administer clinics. In lieu of clinic attendance, each coach must take and pass a rules test (administered by the GISA Office) at least 10 days prior to start of season or first regular season game. Failure to attend a clinic or pass a rules test prior to coaching will subject the coach to a $100 fine. Coaches are not allowed to be on the sideline or in the dugout until rules compliance is met.
  • School/College Name Post Code Group 9629 9826

    School/College Name Post Code Group 9629 9826

    School/college name Post code Group Abacus College L15 4LE 10 All Saints Catholic High School L33 8XF 42 Archbishop Beck Catholic Sports College L9 7BF 125 Archbishop Blanch C of E High School L76HQ 80 Bebington High Sports College CH632PS 30 Benton Park School LS19 6LX 130 Birkenhead School, Birkenhead, Merseyside CH43 2JD 47 Bishop Heber High School SY14 8JD 125 Bolton VI Form College BL3 5BU 200 Broadgreen International School L13 5UQ 137 Broughton Hall High School, Liverpool L12 9HJ 85 Burnley College BB12 0AN 150 Calday Grange Grammar School CH48 8GG 228 Calderstones School L183HS 117 Cardinal Heenan High School, Liverpool L12 9HZ 65 Carmel College WA10 3AG 779 Castell Alun High School, Wrexham LL12 9HA 106 Cheslyn Hay Sport and Community High School, Walsall WS6 7JQ 93 Chesterfield High School L239YB 100 Childwall Sports and Science Academy - (formerly A Specialist Sports School) L15 6XZ 50 Christ the King Catholic High School, Southport PR8 4EX 100 Christ The King Catholic School & Sixth Form Centre PR8 4EX 90 Christleton High School CH3 7AD 190 City of Liverpool College L77JA 11 City of Liverpool College, The Learning Exchange L35TP 111 Cowley International College WA10 6PN 130 Deyes High School, Maghull L31 6DE 150 Ellesmere College SY12 9AB 80 Formby High School L37 3HW 150 Gateacre Community Comprehensive School L25 2RW 50 Great Sankey High School WA5 3AA 120 Grove School, Shropshire TF9 1HF 75 Hawarden High School, Deeside CH5 3DN 88 Holly Lodge Girls College L12 7LE 40 Holy Family Catholic High School, Liverpool L234UL 53
  • Read the Full Report Here

    Read the Full Report Here

    1 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the LSE Housing and Communities Research Team in the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics (LSE), LSE. Thanks to Ceris Anderson and Jane Ashworth from StreetGames for their advice, support and information; also many local stakeholders who provided us with background information and introduced us to their areas – in particular Alex Tate, Sean Daley, Dale Gilmartin, Liz Holding, Geraldine Maddison, Matthew Jacklin, Delroy Hibbert, Andrew Birtwhistle, Harry Jenkinson, Daniel Burford and Jason Turner. We owe special thanks to the 106 young people and parents who shared their experiences. We accept full responsibility for any mistakes, misleading or incomplete information. About LSE Housing and Communities LSE Housing and Communities is a research unit within the Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) at the London School of Economics led by Professor Anne Power. CASE is a multi-disciplinary research centre which focuses on the exploration of different dimensions of social disadvantage, particularly from longitudinal and neighbourhood perspectives, examining the impact of public policy. We aim to understand the social dynamics of disadvantaged neighbourhoods; promote models of housing and neighbourhood management; develop ways to support community and resident self-help action, especially in social housing areas; and shape government policy. 2 Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................................
  • Rougemont Review Summer 2018 Issue 15 Contents

    Rougemont Review Summer 2018 Issue 15 Contents

    #rougemontready ROUGEMONT REVIEW SUMMER 2018 ISSUE 15 CONTENTS WELCOME 4 PREP SCHOOL WELCOME 6 PREP SCHOOL HIGHLIGHTS 8 SENIOR SCHOOL WELCOME 38 SENIOR SCHOOL HIGHLIGHTS 40 SPORT 72 BEYOND THE CLASSROOM 80 KEY DATES 88 Designed by Wonder Company wondercompany.co.uk 2 ROUGEMONT REVIEW #ROUGEMONTREADY 3 WELCOME Each year is special in the life of Congratulations to the class of 2018 the School and for this reason the on achieving excellent results in their magazine is invaluable. The pages are examinations. They have contributed filled with so many memories and to every aspect of school life during images of happy and successful times their time with us through the many spent at Rougemont. talents and attributes they have. I wish them all health, happiness and success This magazine also contains a wide for the future. variety of art work, written articles and photos. It provides an excellent To the new pupils who have recently showcase for our many gifted writers, joined Rougemont, welcome, and may linguists, artists and future scientists/ the time you spend in our school be engineers. both enriching and enjoyable. This publication also illustrates the I would like to take this opportunity participation and success of our pupils to thank Rachel Garrod and her team in the numerous trips, sporting and for the hard work in producing this Mr Robert Carnevale - Headmaster house events throughout the year. high quality magazine and also to the I offer my sincere gratitude to both dedicated and committed staff we staff and pupils for their contribution have here at Rougemont.
  • STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE of POLL and SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS Liverpool City Council

    STATEMENT of PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE of POLL and SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS Liverpool City Council

    STATEMENT OF PERSONS NOMINATED, NOTICE OF POLL AND SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Liverpool City Council Thursday 7th May 2015 Election of a Member of Parliament for the Garston and Halewood Constituency Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a Member of Parliament for Garston and Halewood will be held on Thursday 7 May 2015, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. One Member of Parliament is to be elected. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Names of Signatories Names of Signatories Name of Description (if Home Address Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Candidate any) Assentors Assentors Assentors EAGLE 6 Greenfield Court, Labour Party Stamper John H(+) Dooley Catherine(++) (+) (++) (+) (++) Maria Greenhill Road, Finneran Edna Rasmussen Janine Mossley Hill, Sabino Edward Brandwood Stuart Liverpool, L18 7HW Perry Dean Rifkin Leslie Rifkin Joana N Sabino Phyllis MARTIN (address in the Liberal Democrats Phillips Ian J(+) Juarez Mirna L(++) (+) (++) (+) (++) Anna Clare Garston & Blackburn Lynda H McKeown Julia M Halewood Giannasi Matthew Nisbet Clare M Constituency) Nisbet Duncan I Higgins Thomas Giannasi Deborah Martin Susan SCHEARS (address in the UK Independence Ryan Joseph J(+) Walker Keith J(++) (+) (++) (+) (++) Carl Garston & Party (UKIP) Schears Lisa Bray David Halewood Bray Susan
  • School Prospectus 2021

    School Prospectus 2021

    Education for 16-19 year olds Prospectus 2021 Find out more liverpoolmathsschool.org E: [email protected] // 1 Contents Our mission 2 Headteacher’s Why choose our Maths School? 4 welcome Why Maths Schools? 10 Sixth Form life at the The University of Liverpool Maths School welcomed its first University of Liverpool students in September 2020 and is already an inspiring school Damian Haigh Maths School 14 in which to study and teach. Our staff feel privileged to work Headteacher Your study programme 18 with a student body made up of interesting, talented and highly I know how fortunate I am to be the headteacher of In this school they can be the teachers and carers They learn to think and talk in rigorous, mathematical Course information 20 committed young people. The students reciprocate by taking this very special school. It is a delight every day to they want to be – working hard with great students ways. They quickly start to enjoy this and to support see talented and hardworking students thriving and but not stressed and not distracted by poor behaviour. each other’s learning as part of the process. great pride in their school, by expressing gratitude for the never having to hide their enthusiasm for abstract Future professionals 22 We provide inspiration and expert support to provide An education at the University of Liverpool Maths understanding. As a maths teacher I have often excellent teaching and pastoral care and, above all, by the right kind of challenge and inspiration for our School is certainly challenging, but our students will thought that the brightest and most committed Entry requirements 25 students: to prepare them properly for places on also tell you that it’s deeply rewarding, huge fun and students get the worst deal in school, being put in working hard and learning rapidly.
  • Youth Team Scotland Set for Samoa

    Youth Team Scotland Set for Samoa

    GAMES PREVIEW ISSUE COMMONWEALTH GAMES SCOTLAND NEWSLETTER ISSUE 23 – SUMMER 2015 Paul Bush and Jon Doig with team representatives. Congratulating all the athletes, Commonwealth Games Chairman, Paul Youth Team Scotland Bush OBE said: “Congratulations to all 28 athletes on their selection for Youth Team set for Samoa Scotland at Samoa 2015. “It is a fantastic achievement to be Hot on the heels of the one year anniversary of Glasgow 2014, 28 talented young selected for this important event and a athletes from eight sports head to Samoa this month, to represent Youth Team great opportunity for them to gain a real Scotland at the fifth Commonwealth Youth Games. understanding of what the Commonwealth Games is all about from both a sporting The athletes, aged 14–18 years, will all Hutchison, while the Weightlifting team and cultural perspective. make their Commonwealth Games debuts includes Youth Team Scotland’s youngest in Athletics, Archery, Boxing, Lawn team member – 14 year old Rowan Morrogh “The Commonwealth Youth Games is Bowls, Squash, Swimming, Tennis and Bernard – who holds an incredible 16 increasingly playing a key role in the Weightlifting, with the competition taking Scottish records at youth and junior level. development of our young athletes and place from 5-11 September 2015. ensuring that when they progress to the Struan Caughey, a representative at this full Commonwealth Games they are able to Lawn Bowlers Carla Banks and Darren Weir, year’s World Youth Championships, and deliver their best possible performance at who won their respective events at the Evelina D’Arcy become the first archers their first Games, in many cases going on hotly contested Bowls Scotland selection to represent Scotland at a Youth Games to win medals for Scotland.