PRINCIPLES of BIG DATA Intentionally Left As Blank PRINCIPLES of BIG DATA Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PRINCIPLES of BIG DATA Intentionally Left As Blank PRINCIPLES of BIG DATA Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information PRINCIPLES OF BIG DATA Intentionally left as blank PRINCIPLES OF BIG DATA Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information JULES J. BERMAN, Ph.D., M.D. AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Morgan Kaufmann is an imprint of Elsevier Acquiring Editor: Andrea Dierna Editorial Project Manager: Heather Scherer Project Manager: Punithavathy Govindaradjane Designer: Russell Purdy Morgan Kaufmann is an imprint of Elsevier 225 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA Copyright # 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods or professional practices, may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information or methods described herein. In using such information or methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility. To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Berman, Jules J. Principles of big data : preparing, sharing, and analyzing complex information / Jules J Berman. pages cm ISBN 978-0-12-404576-7 1. Big data. 2. Database management. I. Title. QA76.9.D32B47 2013 005.74–dc23 2013006421 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Printed and bound in the United States of America 131415161710987654321 For information on all MK publications visit our website at www.mkp.com Dedication To my father, Benjamin v Intentionally left as blank Contents Acknowledgments xi 4. Introspection Author Biography xiii Background 49 Preface xv Knowledge of Self 50 Introduction xix eXtensible Markup Language 52 Introduction to Meaning 54 Namespaces and the Aggregation of Meaningful 1. Providing Structure to Unstructured Assertions 55 Data Resource Description Framework Triples 56 Reflection 59 Background 1 Use Case: Trusted Time Stamp 59 Machine Translation 2 Summary 60 Autocoding 4 Indexing 9 Term Extraction 11 5. Data Integration and Software Interoperability 2. Identification, Deidentification, Background 63 and Reidentification The Committee to Survey Standards 64 Standard Trajectory 65 Background 15 Specifications and Standards 69 Features of an Identifier System 17 Versioning 71 Registered Unique Object Identifiers 18 Compliance Issues 73 Really Bad Identifier Methods 22 Interfaces to Big Data Resources 74 Embedding Information in an Identifier: Not Recommended 24 One-Way Hashes 25 6. Immutability and Immortality Use Case: Hospital Registration 26 Deidentification 28 Background 77 Data Scrubbing 30 Immutability and Identifiers 78 Reidentification 31 Data Objects 80 Lessons Learned 32 Legacy Data 82 Data Born from Data 83 3. Ontologies and Semantics Reconciling Identifiers across Institutions 84 Zero-Knowledge Reconciliation 86 Background 35 The Curator’s Burden 87 Classifications, the Simplest of Ontologies 36 Ontologies, Classes with Multiple Parents 39 7. Measurement Choosing a Class Model 40 Introduction to Resource Description Framework Background 89 Schema 44 Counting 90 Common Pitfalls in Ontology Development 46 Gene Counting 93 vii viii CONTENTS Dealing with Negations 93 Step 2. Resource Evaluation 158 Understanding Your Control 95 Step 3. A Question Is Reformulated 159 Practical Significance of Measurements 96 Step 4. Query Output Adequacy 160 Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: The Mark of a Great Step 5. Data Description 161 Data Manager 97 Step 6. Data Reduction 161 Step 7. Algorithms Are Selected, If Absolutely 8. Simple but Powerful Big Data Techniques Necessary 162 Step 8. Results Are Reviewed and Conclusions Background 99 Are Asserted 164 Look at the Data 100 Step 9. Conclusions Are Examined and Subjected Data Range 110 to Validation 164 Denominator 112 Frequency Distributions 115 Mean and Standard Deviation 119 12. Failure Estimation-Only Analyses 122 Background 167 Use Case: Watching Data Trends with Google Failure Is Common 168 Ngrams 123 Failed Standards 169 Use Case: Estimating Movie Preferences 126 Complexity 172 When Does Complexity Help? 173 9. Analysis When Redundancy Fails 174 Save Money; Don’t Protect Harmless Background 129 Information 176 Analytic Tasks 130 After Failure 177 Clustering, Classifying, Recommending, and Use Case: Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid, Modeling 130 a Bridge Too Far 178 Data Reduction 134 Normalizing and Adjusting Data 137 Big Data Software: Speed and Scalability 139 13. Legalities Find Relationships, Not Similarities 141 Background 183 10. Special Considerations in Big Data Responsibility for the Accuracy and Legitimacy of Analysis Contained Data 184 Rights to Create, Use, and Share the Resource 185 Background 145 Copyright and Patent Infringements Incurred by Theory in Search of Data 146 Using Standards 187 Data in Search of a Theory 146 Protections for Individuals 188 Overfitting 148 Consent 190 Bigness Bias 148 Unconsented Data 194 Too Much Data 151 Good Policies Are a Good Policy 197 Fixing Data 152 Use Case: The Havasupai Story 198 Data Subsets in Big Data: Neither Additive nor Transitive 153 14. Societal Issues Additional Big Data Pitfalls 154 Background 201 11. Stepwise Approach to Big Data How Big Data Is Perceived 201 Analysis The Necessity of Data Sharing, Even When It Seems Irrelevant 204 Background 157 Reducing Costs and Increasing Productivity with Step 1. A Question Is Formulated 158 Big Data 208 CONTENTS ix Public Mistrust 210 Glossary 229 Saving Us from Ourselves 211 References 247 Hubris and Hyperbole 213 Index 257 15. The Future Background 217 Last Words 226 Intentionally left as blank Acknowledgments I thank Roger Day, and Paul Lewis who res- Denise Penrose, who worked on her very last olutely poured through the entire manuscript, day at Elsevier to find this title a suitable home placing insightful and useful comments in at Elsevier’s Morgan Kaufmann imprint. I every chapter. I thank Stuart Kramer, whose thank Andrea Dierna, Heather Scherer, and valuable suggestions for the content and orga- all the staff at Morgan Kaufmann who nization of the text came when the project was shepherded this book through the publication in its formative stage. Special thanks go to and marketing processes. xi Intentionally left as blank Author Biography Jules Berman holds two Bachelor of Science held joint appointments at the University of degrees from MIT (Mathematics, and Earth Maryland Medical Center and at the Johns and Planetary Sciences), a Ph.D. from Temple Hopkins Medical Institutions. In 1998, he University, and anM.D.fromthe University of became the Program Director for Pathology Miami. He was a graduate researcher in the Informatics in the Cancer Diagnosis Program Fels Cancer Research Institute at Temple Uni- at the U.S. National Cancer Institute, where versity and at the American Health Founda- he worked and consulted on Big Data projects. tion in Valhalla, New York. His postdoctoral In 2006, Dr. Berman was President of the Asso- studies were completed at the U.S. National ciation for Pathology Informatics. In 2011, he Institutes of Health, and his residency was received the Lifetime Achievement Award completed at the George Washington Univer- from the Association for Pathology Informat- sity Medical Center in Washington, DC. ics. He is a coauthor on hundreds of scientific Dr. Berman served as Chief of Anatomic publications. Today, Dr. Berman is a freelance Pathology, Surgical Pathology and Cytopa- author, writing extensively in his three areas thology at the Veterans Administration Medi- of expertise: informatics, computer program- cal Center in Baltimore, Maryland, where he ming, and pathology. xiii Intentionally left as blank Preface We can’t solve problems by using the same value. The primary purpose of this book is kind of thinking we used when we created to explain the principles upon which serious them. Albert Einstein Big Data resources are built. All of the data held in Big Data resources must have a form Data pours into millions of computers ev- that supports search, retrieval, and analysis. ery moment of every day. It is estimated that The analytic methods must be available for the total accumulated data stored on com- review, and the analytic results must be puters worldwide is about 300 exabytes (that’s available for validation. 300 billion gigabytes). Data storage increases Perhaps
Recommended publications
  • ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) Liaison to IFLA
    ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) liaison to IFLA Annual Report 2015 TC46 on Information and documentation has been leading efforts related to information management since 1947. Standards1 developed under ISO/TC46 facilitate access to knowledge and information and standardize automated tools, computer systems, and services relating to its major stakeholders of: libraries, publishing, documentation and information centres, archives, records management, museums, indexing and abstracting services, and information technology suppliers to these communities. TC46 has a unique role among ISO information-related committees in that it focuses on the whole lifecycle of information from its creation and identification, through delivery, management, measurement, and archiving, to final disposition. *** The following report summarizes activities of TC46, SC4, SC8 SC92 and their resolutions of the annual meetings3, in light of the key-concepts of interest to the IFLA community4. 1. SC4 Technical interoperability 1.1 Activities Standardization of protocols, schemas, etc. and related models and metadata for processes used by information organizations and content providers, including libraries, archives, museums, publishers, and other content producers. 1.2 Active Working Group WG 11 – RFID in libraries WG 12 – WARC WG 13 – Cultural heritage information interchange WG 14 – Interlibrary Loan Transactions 1.3 Joint working groups 1 For the complete list of published standards, cfr. Appendix A. 2 ISO TC46 Subcommittees: TC46/SC4 Technical interoperability; TC46/SC8 Quality - Statistics and performance evaluation; TC46/SC9 Identification and description; TC46/SC 10 Requirements for document storage and conditions for preservation - Cfr Appendix B. 3 The 42nd ISO TC46 plenary, subcommittee and working groups meetings, Beijing, June 1-5 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctoral Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Behavioural and Cultural Studies Heidelberg University in Partial Fulfillment of Th
    Doctoral thesis submitted to the Faculty of Behavioural and Cultural Studies Heidelberg University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Dr. phil.) in Psychology Title of the thesis Assessment of Problem Solving Skills by means of Multiple Complex Systems – Validity of Finite Automata and Linear Dynamic Systems presented by Dipl.-Psych. Andreas Fischer year of submission 2015 Dean: Prof. Dr. Klaus Fiedler Advisor: Prof. Dr. Joachim Funke Assessment of Problem Solving Skills 2 Assessment of Problem Solving Skills Table of content Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Summary…………………………………………………………………………..................... 5 List of scientific publications regarding the publication-based thesis ……………………………………………………… 7 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………. 8 2. Conceptual Background…………………………………………………………... 9 2.1. MicroDYN – Microworlds based on dynamic linear equations………………... 15 2.2. MicroFIN – Microworlds based on finite state machines………………………. 16 2.3. Problem Solving Skills assessed by means of MicroDYN and MicroFIN……. 18 3. Research on Tools and Perspectives concerning the MCS approach………. 22 3.1. Review 1: Content Validity (cf. Fischer, Greiff, & Funke, 2012) ……….…….. 23 3.2. Review 2: Convergent Validity (cf. Greiff, Fischer, et al., 2013) ……….…….. 25 3.3. Review 3: Discriminant Validity (cf. Fischer et al., in press)..………….……… 27 4. Discussion and outlook …………………………………………………………… 29 References……………………………………………………………………………………… 37 Declarations in accordance with § 8 (1) b and § 8 (1) c of the regulations for doctoral degrees of the Faculty of Behavioural and Cultural Studies of Heidelberg University……………………………………………………………………… 43 Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………… 44 3 Assessment of Problem Solving Skills Acknowledgements First of all, with regard to this thesis, I would like to thank my supervisor Prof. Dr. Joachim Funke, who provided me the opportunity to write this thesis the way I did (in the BMBF project Fu 01JG1062).
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Liaison to ISO Technical Committee 46 to IFLA Cataloguing
    Report of liaison to ISO Technical Committee 46 to IFLA Cataloguing Section, August 2019 Prepared by William Leonard, Chair Standards Council of Canada Mirror Committee to ISO TC46; IFLA CATS member ISO Technical Committee 46 Information and documentation scope: Standardization of practices relating to libraries, documentation and information centres, publishing, archives, records management, museum documentation, indexing and abstracting services, and information science. https://www.iso.org/committee/48750.html ISO TC 46 Information and documentation Current Projects: Working Group 2 Coding of country names and related entities (ISO 3166) Working Group 3 Conversion of written languages (transliteration standards) Working Group 4 and Ad Hoc Group Ongoing revision of ISO 5127:2017 Information and documentation – Foundation and vocabulary Working Group 13 Information Governance Joint TC 171/SC 2 - TC 42 - TC 46/SC 11 - TC 130 WG: Document management applications - Application issues - PDF/A Project recently completed: ISO 8:2019 Presentation and identification of periodicals (revision) News: The Swedish Institute for Standards (SIS) has been approved as the secretariat and chair for Subcommittee 10 Requirements for document storage and conditions for preservation. The project to revise the three parts of ISO 3166 Codes for the representation of names of countries and their subdivisions is currently in the Draft International Standard balloting stage. A ballot to introduce the Jyutping Romanization of Cantonese into the ISO suite of transliteration
    [Show full text]
  • Software II: Principles of Programming Languages
    Software II: Principles of Programming Languages Lecture 6 – Data Types Some Basic Definitions • A data type defines a collection of data objects and a set of predefined operations on those objects • A descriptor is the collection of the attributes of a variable • An object represents an instance of a user- defined (abstract data) type • One design issue for all data types: What operations are defined and how are they specified? Primitive Data Types • Almost all programming languages provide a set of primitive data types • Primitive data types: Those not defined in terms of other data types • Some primitive data types are merely reflections of the hardware • Others require only a little non-hardware support for their implementation The Integer Data Type • Almost always an exact reflection of the hardware so the mapping is trivial • There may be as many as eight different integer types in a language • Java’s signed integer sizes: byte , short , int , long The Floating Point Data Type • Model real numbers, but only as approximations • Languages for scientific use support at least two floating-point types (e.g., float and double ; sometimes more • Usually exactly like the hardware, but not always • IEEE Floating-Point Standard 754 Complex Data Type • Some languages support a complex type, e.g., C99, Fortran, and Python • Each value consists of two floats, the real part and the imaginary part • Literal form real component – (in Fortran: (7, 3) imaginary – (in Python): (7 + 3j) component The Decimal Data Type • For business applications (money)
    [Show full text]
  • New Assessment Tools for Cross-Curricular Competencies in the Domain of Problem Solving
    New Assessment Tools for Cross-Curricular Competencies in the Domain of Problem Solving Final report of project ERB-SOE2-CT98-2042 Funded under the Targeted Socio-Economic Research (TSER) Programme - Directorate General XII Science, Research and Development/ Directorate F EUROPEAN Commission Project coordinator: Dr. Jean-Paul Reeff Ministère de l´Education Nationale, de la Formation Professionnelle et des Sports 29, rue Aldringen L-2926 Luxembourg Partners: Institut für Bildungsforschung (IBF), Germany Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Germany Center for School Development, Austria University of Groningen, Netherlands University of Heidelberg, Germany 1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................3 2 Individual network members..........................................................................................4 3 Background and objectives of the project .......................................................................5 4 Network activities ..........................................................................................................7 5 Main Results................................................................................................................11 5.1 Problem Solving as a Cross-Curricular Competence.................................................11 5.1.1 Read instruction ...............................................................................................11 5.1.2 Method.............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Cognitive Abilities and Prior Knowledge on Complex Problem Solving Performance – Empirical Results and a Plea for Ecologically Valid Microworlds
    fpsyg-09-00626 May 4, 2018 Time: 16:14 # 1 HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY published: 08 May 2018 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00626 Impact of Cognitive Abilities and Prior Knowledge on Complex Problem Solving Performance – Empirical Results and a Plea for Ecologically Valid Microworlds Heinz-Martin Süß1* and André Kretzschmar2 1 Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany, 2 Hector Research Institute of Education Sciences and Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany The original aim of complex problem solving (CPS) research was to bring the cognitive demands of complex real-life problems into the lab in order to investigate problem solving behavior and performance under controlled conditions. Up until now, the validity of psychometric intelligence constructs has been scrutinized with regard to its importance for CPS performance. At the same time, different CPS measurement Edited by: Wolfgang Schoppek, approaches competing for the title of the best way to assess CPS have been developed. University of Bayreuth, Germany In the first part of the paper, we investigate the predictability of CPS performance on Reviewed by: the basis of the Berlin Intelligence Structure Model and Cattell’s investment theory as Natassia Goode, University of the Sunshine Coast, well as an elaborated knowledge taxonomy. In the first study, 137 students managed Australia a simulated shirt factory (Tailorshop; i.e., a complex real life-oriented system) twice, Marc Halbrügge, while in the second study, 152 students completed a forestry scenario (FSYS; i.e., Technische Universität Berlin, Germany a complex artificial world system). The results indicate that reasoning – specifically *Correspondence: numerical reasoning (Studies 1 and 2) and figural reasoning (Study 2) – are the only Heinz-Martin Süß relevant predictors among the intelligence constructs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cen Workshop Agreement Cwa 14871
    CEN CWA 14871 WORKSHOP October 2003 AGREEMENT ICS 03.180; 35.060; 35.240.99 English version Controlled Vocabularies for Learning Object Metadata: Typology, impact analysis, guidelines and a web based Vocabularies Registry This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the constitution of which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement. The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN Management Centre can be held accountable for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation. This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members. This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels © 2003 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. CWA 14871:2003 D/E/F
    [Show full text]
  • A Könyvtárüggyel Kapcsolatos Nemzetközi Szabványok
    A könyvtárüggyel kapcsolatos nemzetközi szabványok 1. Állomány-nyilvántartás ISO 20775:2009 Information and documentation. Schema for holdings information 2. Bibliográfiai feldolgozás és adatcsere, transzliteráció ISO 10754:1996 Information and documentation. Extension of the Cyrillic alphabet coded character set for non-Slavic languages for bibliographic information interchange ISO 11940:1998 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Thai ISO 11940-2:2007 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Thai characters into Latin characters. Part 2: Simplified transcription of Thai language ISO 15919:2001 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Devanagari and related Indic scripts into Latin characters ISO 15924:2004 Information and documentation. Codes for the representation of names of scripts ISO 21127:2014 Information and documentation. A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information ISO 233:1984 Documentation. Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters ISO 233-2:1993 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters. Part 2: Arabic language. Simplified transliteration ISO 233-3:1999 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Arabic characters into Latin characters. Part 3: Persian language. Simplified transliteration ISO 25577:2013 Information and documentation. MarcXchange ISO 259:1984 Documentation. Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters ISO 259-2:1994 Information and documentation. Transliteration of Hebrew characters into Latin characters. Part 2. Simplified transliteration ISO 3602:1989 Documentation. Romanization of Japanese (kana script) ISO 5963:1985 Documentation. Methods for examining documents, determining their subjects, and selecting indexing terms ISO 639-2:1998 Codes for the representation of names of languages. Part 2. Alpha-3 code ISO 6630:1986 Documentation. Bibliographic control characters ISO 7098:1991 Information and documentation.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Concurrent Hash Tables: Fast and General(?)!
    Concurrent Hash Tables: Fast and General(?)! TOBIAS MAIER and PETER SANDERS, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany ROMAN DEMENTIEV, Intel Deutschland GmbH, Germany Concurrent hash tables are one of the most important concurrent data structures, which are used in numer- ous applications. For some applications, it is common that hash table accesses dominate the execution time. To efficiently solve these problems in parallel, we need implementations that achieve speedups inhighly concurrent scenarios. Unfortunately, currently available concurrent hashing libraries are far away from this requirement, in particular, when adaptively sized tables are necessary or contention on some elements occurs. Our starting point for better performing data structures is a fast and simple lock-free concurrent hash table based on linear probing that is, however, limited to word-sized key-value types and does not support 16 dynamic size adaptation. We explain how to lift these limitations in a provably scalable way and demonstrate that dynamic growing has a performance overhead comparable to the same generalization in sequential hash tables. We perform extensive experiments comparing the performance of our implementations with six of the most widely used concurrent hash tables. Ours are considerably faster than the best algorithms with similar restrictions and an order of magnitude faster than the best more general tables. In some extreme cases, the difference even approaches four orders of magnitude. All our implementations discussed in this publication
    [Show full text]
  • International Classi Fication
    UDC 025.4(05) Vol. 3 (1976) No.2 INTERNATIONAL CLASSI FICATION -- ------ - ---- Journal on Theory and Practice of Universal and Special Classification Systems and Thesauri Zeitschrift zur Theorie und Praxis universaler und spezieller Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri Editors/Herausgeber Dr. I. Dahlberg. Frankfurt. BRD (Editor·in·Chiefi Prof. Dr. Dr. A. Diemer. Diisseldorf.IlRD Prof. A. Neelameghan, Bangalore, Inoia Prof. J. M. Perreault. Huntsville, Ala., USA co·sponsored by F IDICR and by the I F LA I nternational Office for UBC in collaboration with I in ZusammenCirbeit mit Prof. P. Atherton, Syracuse, N.Y., USA Dr. A. I. Chernyj, Moscow. USSR Dipl. Math. H. Fangmever. Ispra, Italy Dipl.·Volksw. O. Gekeler, Ulm, BRD Prof. E. de Gralier, Paris, France Dr. F. Lang, Vienna, Austria Cons. Eng. V. Nakamura, Tokyo, Japan Dr. E. Seib�r. Warsaw, Poland Prof. Dr. D. Soergel, College Park, M,i., USA Prof. Dr. R. Sakal, Stony Brook, N. Y.• USA Prof. A. L. C. Vicentini t. Brasilia, B,;.tsil Prof. B. C. Vickery, London. England Prof. Dr. E . Wuster, Wieselburg, Austl'ia and the Forschungsabt. Information und Dokumentation des Philosophischen Instituts. Universitat Dusseldorf (Direktor: Prof. Dr. N. Henrichsl Verlag Dokumentation, Publishers, Munchen I --_. - -- -_.--- I (SSN 0340·0050 - (ntern. Classificat.,](19]6) No. 2,-p._6_5_-134 (iVlii.llChEln, Nov. 197,s1 � INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION Vol. 3 (1976) No. 2 UDC 0254 (05) INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION Contents Journal on Theory and Practice of Universal and Special Classification Systems and Thesauri Zeitschrift zur Theorie und Praxis Editorial What is your opinion? . 65 universaler und spezieiler Klassifi­ In Memoriam-Abner L.
    [Show full text]
  • International Standard 7220
    This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-606133 INTERNATIONAL ISO STANDARD 7220 First edition 1996-11-15 Information and documentation - Presentation of catalogues of Standards Information et documen ta tion - Prksentation des catalogues de normes Reference number ISO 7220:1996(E) This preview is downloaded from www.sis.se. Buy the entire standard via https://www.sis.se/std-606133 ISO 7220: 1996(E) Foreword ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national Standards organizations (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO technical committees. Esch member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization. Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote. International Standard ISO 7220 was prepared by Technical Committee ISOnC 46, Information and documentation, Subcommittee SC 9, Presen ta tion, iden tifica tion and descrip tion of documen ts. Annexes A to D of this International Standard are for information only. 0 ISO 1996 All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronie or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without Permission in writing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • A PROCESS ANALYSIS of ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING and ASSESSMENT of PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS Sarah Grigg Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2012 A PROCESS ANALYSIS OF ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING AND ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS Sarah Grigg Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Part of the Industrial Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Grigg, Sarah, "A PROCESS ANALYSIS OF ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING AND ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS" (2012). All Dissertations. 1012. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1012 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A PROCESS ANALYSIS OF ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING AND ASSESSMENT OF PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Philosophy Industrial Engineering by Sarah J. Grigg December 2012 Accepted by: Dr. Anand Gramopadhye, Committee Chair Dr. Lisa Benson Dr. Joel Greenstein Dr. Sandra Garrett ABSTRACT In the engineering profession, one of the most critical skills to possess is accurate and efficient problem solving. Thus, engineering educators should strive to help students develop skills needed to become competent problem solvers. In order to measure the development of skills, it is necessary to assess student performance, identify any deficiencies present in problem solving attempts, and identify trends in performance over time. Through iterative assessment using standard assessment metrics, researchers/instructors are able to track trends in problem solving performance across time, which can serve as a gauge of students’ learning gains.
    [Show full text]