DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effect of Rest Frames on Simulator Sickness Reduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effect of Rest Frames on Simulator Sickness Reduction The effect of rest frames on simulator sickness reduction by Zekun Cao Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science Duke University Date: Approved: Regis Kopper, Supervisor Mary Cummings Michael Zavlanos Jason Jerald Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Abstract The effect of rest frames on simulator sickness reduction by Zekun Cao Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science Duke University Date: Approved: Regis Kopper, Supervisor Mary Cummings Michael Zavlanos Jason Jerald An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2017 Copyright c 2017 by Zekun Cao All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract With increasing prevalence and capabilities of Virtual Reality (VR) as a part of education, entertainment, data analysis and industrial applications, the consideration of constructing a more user-friendly virtual environment becomes more important, which requires the reduction or elimination of simulator sickness (SS) -- a discomfort caused in simulated environment. As a form of motion sickness (MS) -- caused by movement in travel, some signs and symptoms of SS are the same as those of MS's, such as pallor, cold sweating, nausea, and vomiting. Several convincing theories or hypothesis to explain the cause of SS have been advanced, such as Sensory Conflict Theory, Postural Instability Theory and Rest Frames Hypothesis. Based on the first two theories aforementioned, high-quality tracking systems (Pierre et al., 2015) and modification of field of view (FOV) (Fernandes and Feiner, 2016) have been proposed to reduce the mismatch between visual perception and vestibular system in virtual environment (VE). Two main drawbacks exist in these techniques: (1) They will make uses weary in VE needs long distance physical navigation; (2) Modifying the field of view will decrease immersion. To this end, inspired by the rest frame hypothesis (Prothero, 1998; Prothero and Parker, 2003) and previous study on field of view (Fernandes and Feiner, 2016), the goal of this research is to evaluate the effect of rest frames -- portions of the virtual environment that remain fixed in relation to the real world and do not move as the user moves around -- on SS reduction. A study was performed in this research, in iv which all participants experienced two different VR sessions: one with rest frames and the other without rest frames. The rest frames were developed by using a trans- parent cockpit attached with a black metal net in our experimental environment. A questionnaire asking users' discomfort was shown periodically in the VE during the study, which allowed us to record the level of participants' comfort in real time. Par- ticipants were required to finish a Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) (Kennedy et al., 1993) and a presence questionnaire (Slater et al., 1994) after completing either session, to analyze the influence of rest frames on presence and their overall sickness induced by VR. Through comparing the time spent in VE, the real-time subjects' discomfort levels and scores of SSQ and presence questionnaire from both sessions, we found that rest frames have advantages as follows: (1) Users could experience VEs without physical navigation; (2) Rest frames significantly helped users acclimate to VR; (3) The level of discomfort in VR was reduced; (4) The level of presence was not impacted. v To my parents who supported me, taught me the value of working with schedule and happiness, and provided me with the opportunity to receive a great education. To Dr. Regis Kopper and Dr. Jason Jerald who revealed the charm of virtual reality, and for their guidance, support, and ability to lend sound technical advice without a moments notice vi Contents Abstract iv List of Figures ix List of Abbreviations and Symbolsx 1 Introduction1 1.1 Motivation.................................2 1.2 Research Approach............................4 1.3 Research Questions............................5 1.4 Outline of Master's Thesis........................5 1.5 Summary.................................6 2 Literature Review7 2.1 Theories on Motion Sickness.......................8 2.1.1 Sensory conflict theory......................8 2.1.2 Postural instability theory....................9 2.2 Current Simulator Sickness Reduction Techniques........... 11 2.2.1 Motion simulation........................ 11 2.2.2 Visual Methods.......................... 12 2.2.3 Medication............................ 14 2.3 Rest Frame Hypothesis and Related Works............... 15 vii 3 Material and Method 17 3.1 Design and Implementation....................... 17 3.2 Equipment................................. 19 3.3 Procedure................................. 22 3.4 Participants and Groups......................... 23 4 Results and Analysis 26 4.1 Discomfort Score............................. 27 4.1.1 Interaction Effects........................ 27 4.2 Exposure Time.............................. 32 4.3 Simulator Sickness............................ 32 4.4 Presence.................................. 37 5 Discussion 39 6 Conclusion and Future Work 42 A SIMULATOR SICKNESS QUESTIONAIRE (SSQ) 44 B PRESENCE QUESTIONNAIRE 48 C VIDEO GAME EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE 50 D STATISTICS DATA 53 Bibliography 56 viii List of Figures 2.1 Neural mismatch model of sensory conflict theory........... 10 3.1 Rest frames (black metal net)...................... 19 3.2 No rest frames............................... 20 3.3 Map of Path with Arrows and Arches in Application......... 20 3.4 Question Shown at Each Waypoint................... 21 3.5 Waypoint in Virtual Environment.................... 21 3.6 Travel Paused and Question Shown at Waypoints........... 22 3.7 Out of Path Warnings.......................... 24 3.8 Seated study participant with Oculus and holding gamepad used for virtual navigation............................. 24 3.9 Design of two-session experiment.................... 25 4.1 Discomfort scores over time for individual participants and mean dis- comfort scores over waypoints by session................ 30 4.2 Mean discomfort scores over time by session. (Same color coding as Figure 4.1.)................................ 31 4.3 Number of participants finished all laps at each session........ 33 4.4 Overall SS score over two orderings................... 34 4.5 Cluster score over two orderings..................... 36 4.6 Presence score over two orderings.................... 37 ix List of Abbreviations and Symbols Abbreviations DS Discomfort Score FOV Field of view HMD Head Mounted Display MS Motion Sickness NR No Rest Frames PI Postural Instability RF Rest Frames SC Sensory Conflict SS Simulator Sickness. VR Virtual Reality VE Virtual Environment x 1 Introduction Virtual reality (VR) is rapidly being adopted in high-risk or high-cost environments for its capability in simulating real environment distinctly, modularizing the soft- ware used, creating additional worlds less expensively and ensuring controllability. For example, VR has been developed as a psychological therapy with which psy- chotherapists treat those patients with phobias, who require specific treatments that are hard to be achieved via regular methods in real world (Carlin et al., 1997; Miloff et al., 2016). In addition to employment in psychotherapy, VR also can act as an auxiliary remedy for rehabilitation (Borrego et al., 2016) or a substitute to simplify and reinforce traditional military, surgical or industrial trainings(Baumann, 1993; Seymour et al., 2002; Kozak et al., 1993). Despite the rising use of VR, and the boom in popularity within the mass con- sumer world, such as Oculus Rift, HTC Vive and Samsung Gear VR (OculusVR, 2016; HTCVive, 2016), all these advanced devices are facing a common problem -- simulator sickness (SS). Appliance of auxiliary devices, including walking simula- tors, also known as treadmills, and modification in field of view are proven significant success on SS reduction (Jaeger and Mourant, 2001; Fernandes and Feiner, 2016). 1 1.1 Motivation Current tactics of exacerbating SS can be summarized as two main styles: motion simulators (Mourant and Yin, 2010), which involve interaction techniques that allow users to receive vestibular stimulation, and modification of field-of-view (FOV), such as dynamic FOV restriction (Fernandes and Feiner, 2016). However, they to some extent also need extra investments on devices or sacrifice display fidelity. Motion simulators works well when the VE is small which does not require travel over long distances. However, problems emerge when users pass through a large scene such as a convoluted city. Long distance physical navigation, similar to a long-term hiking in real world, can cause users physical weariness and impair users` experience. The utilization of VR in military training requires much higher level of imitation to reality, which means any modifications on FOV may increase possibilities of judgments in critical tasks. Although the influence of motion simulators and modification of FOV have such potential shortcomings, we still cannot deny their effects on SS reduction. There should be a third option, that can alleviate SS without depending much on users vestibular systems
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of Simulator Sickness for 360° Videos on an HMD Subject To
    2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) Evaluation of Simulator Sickness for 360◦ Videos on an HMD Subject to Participants’ Experience with Virtual Reality Majed Elwardy* Hans-Jurgen¨ Zepernick† Yan Hu‡ Thi My Chinh Chu§ Veronica Sundstedt¶ Blekinge Institute of Technology SE-37179 Karlskrona, Sweden ABSTRACT In contrast to the large technological advancements supporting novel immersive visual and interactive applications, the understand- Virtual reality (VR) has seen tremendous advances in head-mounted ing about the level of simulator sickness and cybersickness is less displays (HMDs), optics, media quality, and other improvements developed but similar important to assure customer satisfaction. that facilitate immersive experiences. With the occurrence of new Given that viewing VEs on HMDs is a rather new option for many technologies like Cloud VR and networked VR video services, ap- consumer verticals, studies on simulator sickness that engage partic- plications such as 360◦ video streaming are becoming more popular ipants with different levels of experience with VR are also needed. within the broader consumer markets. As a result, VR content is accessible to customers with rather different levels of experiences with immersive media, i.e., never, sometimes, or often use of VR. 1.1 Related Work The question, therefore, arises to which degree simulator sickness Related recent work is typically based on the simulator sickness is induced to viewers depending on their experiences with VR on ◦ questionnaire (SSQ) proposed in [17]. In [4], a VR simulator of a HMDs. In this paper, simulator sickness is evaluated for 360 videos forestry crane for loading logs onto a truck was evaluated in terms that were shown on an HTC Vive Pro HMD to participants having of quality of experience (QoE) aspects and SSQ to reveal the effects different levels of experience with VR on HMDs.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Reality Sickness During Immersion: an Investigation of Potential Obstacles Towards General Accessibility of VR Technology
    Examensarbete 30hp August 2016 Virtual Reality sickness during immersion: An investigation of potential obstacles towards general accessibility of VR technology. A controlled study for investigating the accessibility of modern VR hardware and the usability of HTC Vive’s motion controllers. Dongsheng Lu Abstract People call the year of 2016 as the year of virtual reality. As the world leading tech giants are releasing their own Virtual Reality (VR) products, the technology of VR has been more available than ever for the mass market now. However, the fact that the technology becomes cheaper and by that reaches a mass-market, does not in itself imply that long-standing usability issues with VR have been addressed. Problems regarding motion sickness (MS) and motion control (MC) has been two of the most important obstacles for VR technology in the past. The main research question of this study is: “Are there persistent universal access issues with VR related to motion control and motion sickness?” In this study a mixed method approach has been utilized for finding more answers related to these two important aspects. A literature review in the area of VR, MS and MC was followed by a quantitative controlled study and a qualitative evaluation. 32 participants were carefully selected for this study, they were divided into different groups and the quantitative data collected from them were processed and analyzed by using statistical test. An interview was also carried out with all of the participants of this study in order to gather more details about the usability of the motion controllers used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Virtual Reality Sickness Mitigation Methods: a Comparative Study in a Racing Game
    Virtual Reality Sickness Mitigation Methods: A Comparative Study in a Racing Game RONGKAI SHI, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China HAI-NING LIANG∗, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China YU WU, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China DIFENG YU, University of Melbourne, Australia WENGE XU, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China Using virtual reality (VR) head-mounted displays (HMDs) can induce VR sickness. VR sickness can cause strong discomfort, decrease users’ presence and enjoyment, especially in games, shorten the duration of the VR experience, and can even pose health risks. Previous research has explored different VR sickness mitigation methods by adding visual effects or elements. Field of View (FOV) reduction, Depth of Field (DOF) blurring, and adding a rest frame into the virtual environment are examples of such methods. Although useful in some cases, they might result in information loss. This research is the first to compare VR sickness, presence, workload to complete a search task, and information loss of these three VR sickness mitigation methods in a racing game with two levels of control. To do this, we conducted a mixed factorial user study (N = 32) with degree of control as the between-subjects factor and the VR sickness mitigation techniques as the within-subjects factor. Participants were required to find targets with three difficulty levels while steering or not steering acarin virtual environment. Our results show that there are no significant differences in VR sickness, presence and workload among these techniques under two levels of control in our VR racing game. We also found that changing FOV dynamically or using DOF blur effects would result in information loss while adding a target reticule as a rest frame would not.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychophysiological and Performance Aspects on Motion Sickness
    Linköping University Medical Dissertations No.1071 Psychophysiological and Performance Aspects on Motion Sickness Joakim Dahlman Division of Rehabilitation Medicine Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Linköping University, Sweden Linköping 2009 © Joakim Dahlman, 2009. Cover picture/illustration:Tax illustration, Hans von Corswant Published articles have been reprinted with the permission of the copyright holders. Printed in Sweden by LiU-Tryck, Linköping, Sweden, 2009 ISBN 978-91-7393-837-2 ISSN 0345-0082 2 Nothing shocks me. I’m a scientist. Harrison Ford (1942- ), as Indiana Jones. 3 1 Content 1 Content ............................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Preface................................................................................................................................8 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 Thesis outline ........................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Motion sickness........................................................................................................ 12 3.2.1 The magnitude of occurrence........................................................................... 13 3.3 The sensory
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancing Data Visualisation to Capture the Simulator Sickness Phenomenon on the Usefulness of Radar Charts
    Data in Brief 13 (2017) 301–305 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Data in Brief journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dib Data Article Enhancing data visualisation to capture the simulator sickness phenomenon: On the usefulness of radar charts Romain Chaumillon a,n, Thomas Romeas a, Charles Paillard a, Delphine Bernardin a,b, Guillaume Giraudet a,b, Jean-François Bouchard c, Jocelyn Faubert a a Visual Psychophysics and Perception Laboratory, School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, 3744 Jean- Brillant, Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1P1 b Essilor Canada Ltd., Montréal, Quebec, Canada c Neuropharmacology Laboratory, School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, 3744 Jean-Brillant, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1P1 article info abstract Article history: The data presented in this article are related to the research article Received 20 April 2017 entitled “The use of transdermal scopolamine to solve methodological Received in revised form issues raised by gender differences in susceptibility to simulator 18 May 2017 sickness” (Chaumillon et al., 2017) [1]. In an outstanding first Accepted 23 May 2017 demonstration, Kennedy et al. [2] showed that the Simulator Available online 31 May 2017 Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) is an appropriate tool to suit the Keywords: purposes of characterizing motion sickness experienced in virtual Simulator sickness environments. This questionnaire has since been used in many Radar charts scientific studies. Recently, Balk et al. [3] suggested that the pro- Driving posed segregation of SSQ scores into three subclasses of symptoms might limit the accuracy of simulator sickness assessment. These authors performed a factor analysis based on SSQ scores obtained from nine studies on driving simulators.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Best Ways of Producing Cybersickness In
    INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTATIONAL NEUROSCIENCE (MTAT.03.291) FINAL PROJECT BEST WAYS OF PRODUCING CYBERSICKNESS IN VR KEVIN KANARBIK AL WILLIAM TAMMSAAR 1 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Cybersickness ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 Cause and symptoms ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Neurological relation ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Oculus Rift experimentation ................................................................................................................................. 6 Previous experiences ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Lab experiments ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Interview ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 The Virtual Reality Game ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating Visually Induced Motion Sickness: a Virtual Hand- Eye Coordination Task
    Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 59th Annual Meeting - 2015 1839 Mitigating Visually Induced Motion Sickness: A virtual hand- eye coordination task Michael K Curtis, M.S., Iowa State University Kayla Dawson, University of Miami Kelli Jackson, Bethune Cookman University Liat Litwin, Tufts University Chase Meusel, M.S., Iowa State University Michael C. Dorneich, Ph.D., Iowa State University Stephen B. Gilbert, Ph.D., Iowa State University Jonathan Kelly, Ph.D., Iowa State University Richard Stone, Ph.D., Iowa State University Eliot Winer, Ph.D., Iowa State University Virtual reality has grown rapidly over the past decade, yet visually induced motion sickness (VIMS), continues to affect the usability of this technology. Aside from medicine, physical hand-eye-coordination tasks have been found to be effective in mitigating symptoms of VIMS, however the need for equipment outside of virtual reality limits the usefulness of these mitigation techniques. In this study, 21 participants were sickened via a virtual obstacle course and used one of two mitigation techniques. The first, natural decay, is simply waiting outside the virtual environment (VE) for symptoms to subside; the other was a virtual peg-in-hole task, performed in the VE with a gamepad. A paired samples t-test confirmed that the virtual obstacle course induced VIMS. Both mitigation techniques significantly lessened the symptoms of VIMS, but there were no significant differences in the effectiveness of mitigation between the two techniques. A virtual mitigation method allowing continued immersion in a VE would pave the way for long-term immersion virtual reality studies, involving topics such as vigilance or training.
    [Show full text]
  • A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL to EVALUATE EFFECT of MASURADHI MANTHA in MOTION SICKNESS” Ajit
    “A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE EFFECT OF MASURADHIwww.pijar.org MANTHA IN MOTION SICKNESS” ISSN:2456:4354 Research Article “A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL TO EVALUATE EFFECT OF MASURADHI MANTHA IN MOTION SICKNESS” Ajit. N. B1, V.A. Chate2, Shreevathsa3, Suma patil4 1&4PG Scholar,2Reader,3Professor and Head department of Samhita and Siddhanta, GAMC,Mysuru. Abstract Motion sickness is common problem faced by most people while travelling by bus, car, train, airplaine and boats. It starts with restlessness and later leads to dizziness, nausea and vomiting. It has synonyms like air Sickness, Car Sickness, Sea Sickness, Travel Sickness and Vomiting. To treat motion sickness mainly antihistamines like scopolamine, promethazine etc drugs are used. In long term usage of these drugs, it produces extra pyramidal signs so it is necessary that, to treat motion sickness without producing un toward effect and to give strength to the patient such one medicine in Masuradhi mantha. Masuradhi is the prepartion made up of masurdal, Madhu and Dadima phala rasa. So in the present article clinical study is conducted in the 80 individuals with motion sickness symptoms. Key words Motion sickness, Masuradhdi mantha, Simulator sickness, questionnaire nausea INTRODUCTION: vehicles. During travelling in bus, car In this fast moving world, everyone is or boat some get travelling sickness or busy in making their life to move fast motion sickness. Motion sickness is forward. Everyone is travelling one not a serious illness, but one place to another to fulfil their desires, habituates to such environment to work, and to achieve. Most of the regularly it will become a serious persons choose buses, cars and other illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Individual Factors with Simulator Sickness and Sense of Presence in Virtual Reality Mediated by Head-Mounted Displays (Hmds)
    Association of Individual Factors with Simulator Sickness and Sense of Presence in Virtual Reality mediated by head-mounted displays (HMDs) Simone Grassini1*, Karin Laumann1, Ann Kristin Luzi1 1 Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway *Corresponding author, [email protected] Abstract Many studies have attempted to understand which individual differences may be related to the symptoms of discomfort during the virtual experience (simulator sickness) and the generally considered positive sense of being inside the simulated scene (sense of presence). Nevertheless, due to the quick technological advancement in the field of virtual reality, most of these studies are now outdated. Advanced technology for virtual reality is commonly mediated by head-mounted displays (HMDs), which aim to increase the sense of the presence of the user, remove stimuli from the external environment, and provide high definition, photo- realistic, three-dimensional images. Our results showed that motion sickness susceptibility and simulator sickness are related and neuroticism may be associated and predict simulator sickness. Furthermore, the results showed that people who are more used to playing video-games are less susceptible to simulator sickness; female participants reported more simulator sickness compared to males (but only for nausea- related symptoms). Female participants also experienced a higher sense of presence compared to males. We suggests that published findings on simulator sickness and the sense of presence in virtual reality environments need to be replicated with the use of modern HMDs. Keywords: simulator sickness, presence, virtual reality, virtual environments, personality, head-mounted displays 1 Introduction The term “virtual reality” (VR) is generally used to describe a synthetic environment generated by a computer (Luciani & Cadoz, 2007); however, many terminological definitions have been proposed (Cipresso, Giglioli, Raya, & Riva, 2018; Fuchs & Bishop, 1992; Gigante, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Mitigation Techniques in Real and Virtual Environments Michael Keneke Curtis Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2014 Investigation of visually induced motion sickness: a comparison of mitigation techniques in real and virtual environments Michael Keneke Curtis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Computer Sciences Commons, Other Psychology Commons, and the Physiology Commons Recommended Citation Curtis, Michael Keneke, "Investigation of visually induced motion sickness: a comparison of mitigation techniques in real and virtual environments" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 14094. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/14094 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigation of visually induced motion sickness: A comparison of mitigation techniques in real and virtual environments by Michael Keneke Curtis A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Human Computer Interaction Program of Study Committee: Stephen B. Gilbert, Major Professor Michael Dorneich Jonathan Kelly Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2014 Copyright c Michael Keneke Curtis, 2014. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION To Gary Maurice Curtis and Lamont Toliver. Thank you for the inspiration and guidance. Rest in peace. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . vii LIST OF FIGURES . viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . x ABSTRACT . xi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION . 1 1.1 Introduction of Key Terms .
    [Show full text]
  • Configural Scoring of Simulator Sickness, Cybersickness and Space Adaptation Syndrome: Similarities and Differences?
    .-- .. _-------- f Source of Acquisition [RSKA\Pubs\Hettinger_ VEBook\RskCybersick with kay revs.doc] NASA JOlulson Space Center Configural Scoring of Simulator Sickness, Cybersickness and Space Adaptation Syndrome: Similarities and Differences? Robert S. Kennedy, Ph.D., Julie M. Drexler, Daniel E. Compton RSK Assessments Inc., Orlando, Florida [email protected] Kay M. Stanney, Ph.D. D. Susan Lanham University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida [email protected] Deborah L. Harm, Ph.D. NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas [email protected] ABSTRACT From a survey of ten U. S. Navy flight simulators a large number (N ) 1,600 exposures) of self­ reports of motion sickness symptomatology were obtained. Using these data, scoring algorithms were derived, which permit examination of groups of individuals that can be scored either for 1) their total sickness experience in a particular device; or, 2) according to three separable symptom clusters which emerged from a Factor Analysis. Scores from this total score are found to be proportional to other global motion sickness symptom checklist scores (e.g., Lackner & Graybiel, 1984) with which they correlate (r = 0.82). The factors that surfaced from the analysis include clusters of symptoms referable as nausea, oculomotor disturbances, and disorientation (N, 0, and D). The factor scores may have utility in differentiating the source of symptoms in different devices. The present chapter describes our experience with the use of both of these types of scores and illustrates their use with examples from flight simulators, space sickness and virtual environments. Key Words: cybersickness, space sickness, simulator sickness, virtual environment, virtual reality, aftereffects Table of Contents Abstract .....
    [Show full text]
  • Psychometric Evaluation of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire As a Measure of Cybersickness William B
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2017 Psychometric evaluation of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire as a measure of cybersickness William B. Stone Iii Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Quantitative Psychology Commons, and the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Stone Iii, William B., "Psychometric evaluation of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire as a measure of cybersickness" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 15429. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15429 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Psychometric evaluation of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire as a measure of cybersickness by William Bruce Stone III A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Human Computer Interaction Program of Study Committee: Douglas Gentile, Major Professor Amy Froelich Marcus Credé Jon Kelly Zlatan Krizan The student author and the program of study committee are solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2017 Copyright © William Bruce Stone III, 2017. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]