Hama Governorate: 2018 Protection Needs Overview

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW V2 (PUBLISHED ON 30 NOVEMBER 2017)

HAMA GOVERNORATE: 1. POPULATION CATEGORIES 22 1,466,242 844,556 287,803 87,813 14,458 104,703

Number of In Besieged/ Militarily In Hard-to-reach Severity Total population People in Need IDPs Returnees sub-districts encircled locations locations

melborp oN melborp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 melborp roniM melborp 2 906,29 49,795 778,7 0 0 0 melborp etaredoM melborp 5 570,941 77,986 216,71 275,8 0 0 Major problem 7 285,593 175,468 53,862 957 7,712 12,107 Severe problem 4 805,348 438,868 187,630 34,501 6,746 24,111 melborp lacitirC melborp 2 382,88 62,185 974,81 842,12 0 902,94

melborp cihportsataC melborp 2 433,54 40,256 343,2 535,22 0 672,91 *#*# DarkoshArmanaz Bennsh Hadher As-Safira 2. SECTOR SEVERITYIdleb RANKINGP BY SUB-DISTRICT Banan Maskana Jurneyyeh Janudiyeh Sarmin Zarbah IDLEB Badama Hajeb Ar-Raqqa Saraqab Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Mhambal Abul Thohur Kansaba Tall Ed-daman Ehsem Ziyara Al-Khafsa Mansura Maarrat An Numan Khanaser Salanfa Kafr Nobol Sanjar Shat-ha Heish

Madiq Castle Tamanaah Khan Shaykun Hamra As-Suqaylabiyah Kafr Zeita Karnaz Suran As-Saan Tell Salhib Muhradah DalyehAnaza Jeb Ramleh Tawahin HAMA Saboura P Oqeirbat Sokhneh Qadmous Hama Masyaf As-Salamiyeh ! ! Wadi El-oyoun ! Eastern Bari Harbanifse ! ! ! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! Oj Ar-Rastan!!! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta Elhiu ! !! ! Talbiseh! Safita Qabu Taldu ! ! Bariqiyeh ! ! ! Ein Elniser Nasra Shin ! Al Makhrim HOMS Jeb Ej-Jarrah Hawash P Severity ranks Kherbet Tin Noor Homs Tall Kalakh Hadideh No data 1 - Minor problem Farqalas Tadmor Al Quasir 2 - Moderate problem Raqama 3 - Major problem LEBANON Qaryatein 4 - Severe problem Hasyaa *# Besieged locations, Sep 2017 5 - Critical problem Sadad Mahin ! 6 - Catastrophic problem Deir AttiyehMilitary encircled locations, Sep 2017

3. CONFLICT INCIDENTS Number of reported conflict incidents by type (from 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017)

500 Airstrike HFA* HWF* IED*/Explosion

250

- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 5102 6102 7102 HFA - Handheld fire arms; HWF - Heavy weapon fire; IED - Improvised explosive device

1 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HIGHLIGHTS

• 433 communities were covered in Hama governorate with one or more protection issues. • 76% of covered communities reported child labor preventing school attendance as occurring and 74% of covered communities reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring. • Men and women are particularly affected by economic exploitation with 6% and 5% covered communities identifying it as a “very common” issue for these population groups respectively. • 83% of covered communities described reliance on humanitarian assistance as a coping mechanism that was used at least "sometimes" by one or more population groups. • 54% of covered communities described children dropping out of school to work as a coping mechanism “sometimes” used by one or more population groups and 48% mentioned early marriage as a coping mechanism “sometimes” used by one or more population groups. • Movement restrictions were reported as occurring in 38% of covered communities. Out of those, 70% covered communities reported activities of armed groups and 67% mentioned screening processes among causes while girls moving alone (70%), men, people without civil documentation and women moving alone (69%) were mentioned as the most affected groups by movement restrictions. • Needs for protection services were identified for all population groups, in particular psychosocial services (67% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups), community centers, recreational activities and care/mechanisms for elderly people (65% covered communities reported it was needed but not present for one or more population groups). • 48% of covered communities reported concerns with humanitarian assistance. Out of the total covered, 145 communities indicated that the assistance delivered was not “what the community needed” and 129 communities mentioned the request for documentation to access assistance as a concern. • Among covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring, 69% indicated “loss” among causes while 81% reported that restricted freedom of movement as one consequence. • Among documents that were described as difficult to obtain in the community, passports and Syrian IDs were respectively mentioned by 52% and 51% of covered communities having reported lack/loss of civil documentation as occurring. • 52% of covered communities reported housing, land and property issues as occurring. Out of those, 66% identified “disputed ownership” and 61% mentioned “lack of documents” as HLP concerns happening “sometimes”.

4. PROTECTION ISSUES a. Occurrence of protection issues i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of those communities reporting occurrence of protection issues)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 553

385 405 396 385 384 373 373 375 377 368 367 359 329 292 301 279 253 204 201 174 169 165 127 128 113 102 0

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting protection issues as occurring Child labour preventing school attendance 76%

Lack/loss of civil documents 74%

Early marriage 70%

Family separation 66%

Economic exploitation 55%

Housing/land/property issues 52%

Domestic violence 47%

Harassment 45%

Kidnapping/Abduction 44%

Explosive hazards* 39%

Child recruitment 35%

Sexual harassment 31%

Sexual violence 28%

*For explosive hazards indicator: this % applies to communities located in sub-districts where 99% of conflict incidents in the country, have taken place since January 2015.

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 2 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES b. Overview of Protection issues with frequency of occurrence i. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, using two different aggregation options across population groups

HIGHEST FREQUENCY occurrence as per one or more population groups Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

24% 26% 30% 34% 45% 53% 48% 61% 55% 56% 65% 69% 72%

53% 25% 53% 53% 40% 28% 52% 17% 39% 46% 38% 22% 21% 33% 18% 14% 7% 20% 7% 12% 6% 5% 5% 8% 7% 2% 7.0% 6.2% 0.3% 3.5% 3.8% 3.0% 1.0% 0.5% 1.6% 0.8% 1.7% 1.1% 0.6% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

AVERAGE FREQUENCY across population groups

24% 26% 30% 34% 45% 53% 48% 61% 55% 56% 65% 69% 72%

59% 66% 38% 47% 31% 35% 69% 63% 44% 51% 43% 29% 28% 9% 8% 6% 5% 15% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0.8% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 1.9% 2.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group

Persons with disabilities

44% 60% 60% 74% 75% 69% 74% 75% 83% 83% 87% 98% 93%

35% 34% 49% 2% 23% 17% 21% 30% 25% 23% 16% 11% 7% 4% 0% 3% 0% 4% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 7% 1% 0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 1.9% 1.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.5% 0.3% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 3 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Men Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

26% 47% 41% 48% 62% 57% 67% 73% 88% 87%

54% 40% 48% 27% 29% 46% 25% 39% 18% 6% 6% 11% 13% 6% 10% 5% 4% 6.4% 2% 1% 1% 0.3% 3.0% 0.5% 0.0% 1.6% 0.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Women

29% 38% 56% 51% 65% 59% 58% 74% 72% 73%

28% 54% 38% 50% 28% 37% 22% 22% 13% 6% 39% 25% 16% 5% 12% 4% 2% 1% 5% 6% 5.1% 2.1% 2.2% 0.5% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% Domestic violence Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property issues Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil documents Sexual harassment Sexual violence

Adolescent boys

25% 36% 51% 50% 65% 60% 62% 62% 66% 70% 75% 81% 88%

54% 49% 30% 40% 29% 15% 33% 47% 35% 29% 24% 32% 16% 11% 9% 6% 6% 14% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 4.0% 6.2% 0.3% 1.1% 0.5% 2.4% 0.8% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 1.0% 0.3% 0.3% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 4 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ii. Graphs showing percentage out of communities that were covered in the analysis, by population group- contd

Adolescent girls Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

34% 31% 38% 54% 59% 65% 63% 61% 76% 75% 74% 78% 96%

49% 52% 28% 47% 38% 29% 20% 18% 12% 4% 14% 35% 36% 23% 23% 14% 11% 5% 4% 0% 2% 2% 1% 2% 5% 4% 4.9% 3.8% 0.3% 1.9% 3.0% 2.2% 1.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Housing/land/property Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance issues documents Boys

44% 54% 63% 61% 64% 67% 84% 81% 80% 94% 89% 92%

40% 26% 41% 29% 5% 14% 36% 30% 18% 19% 10% 7% 11% 5% 15% 4% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0.8% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.8% 2.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 1.0% 0.3% 0.3% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents Girls

44% 62% 63% 63% 65% 69% 82% 77% 82% 84% 90% 98%

41% 26% 35% 28% 2% 16% 34% 28% 22% 17% 15% 14% 9% 9% 4% 3% 0% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1% 0.8% 0.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.8% 2.2% 1.0% 0.3% 0.3% 1.0% 0.3% 0.3% Child labour preventing Child recruitment Domestic violence Early marriage Economic exploitation Explosive hazards Family separation Harassment Kidnapping/Abduction Lack/loss of civil Sexual harassment Sexual violence school attendance documents

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 5 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

c. Analysis per protection issue across population groups (with frequency of occurrence) CHILD LABOUR PREVENTING SCHOOL ATTENDANCE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

24% 24% 25% 34% 54% 62% 60%

53% 54% 66% 49%

41% 35% 35% 17% 15% 12% 9% 4% 3% 4% 0.8% 6.2% 6.2% 4.9% 0.8% 0.8% 1.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with frequency) frequency) disabilities

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 6 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

CHILD RECRUITMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam !!! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

65% 65% 65%

96% 94% 98% 98%

35% 33% 33%

5% 0% 2% 2% 0%4% 0% 0%2% 0%2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 7 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EARLY MARRIAGE i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

30% 30% 31% 51%

84% 82% 83%

53% 52% 69% 47%

14% 14% 14% 16% 17% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 3.8% 0.0% 3.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 8 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

ECONOMIC EXPLOITATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

45% 45% 47% 51% 50% 54% 61% 63% 60%

40% 47% 40% 38% 40% 38% 36% 34% 34%

7% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 2% 2% 4% 4.0% 1.9% 7.0% 6.4% 5.1% 3.0% 0.8% 0.8% 1.9% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 9 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

EXPLOSIVE HAZARDS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! Badr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !El-oyoun!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Frequency of occurrenceShin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah ! Never happensHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Sometimes Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! CommonKalakh issue Kareemeh! Very common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONNot covered in analysis Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Community in a sub-district that has not reported highHasyaa intensity conflict in last 2 years Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group) Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

61% 61% 62% 65% 62% 65% 64% 65% 75%

28% 29% 31% 28% 29% 29% 29% 28% 21% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 2% 2.4% 2.2% 2.5% 2.2% 2.1% 3.0% 3.0% 2.2% 1.3% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 10 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

FAMILY SEPARATION i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

34% 34% 41% 38% 62% 63% 67% 69% 69%

52% 50% 63% 48%

35% 35% 30% 28% 30%

12% 10% 12% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 0.5% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 11 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HARASSMENT i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

55% 55% 59% 61% 73% 70% 74% 81% 77%

39% 37% 44% 25% 29% 36% 18% 22% 25% 6% 1% 2% 4% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 12 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! Badr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! !El-oyoun!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

48% 48% 48% 58% 75% 76% 75%

51% 46% 46% 39% 24% 23% 23% 5% 5% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0.3% 1.6% 1.6% 0.8% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% Aggregated (average Aggregated (highest Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Persons with disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 13 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

KIDNAPPING i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

56% 56% 57% 66% 74% 75% 80% 82% 83%

38% 39% 43% 25% 32% 23% 19% 17% 16% 1% 5% 4% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 0.3% 0.8% 0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 14 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

LACK/LOSS OF CIVIL DOCUMENTS i. Map of communities by frequency of occurrence across population groups (using highest frequency as per one or more population groups)

Janudiyeh Idleb Idleb Idleb Sarmin Banan As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Saraqab Badama Ariha Mhambal Abul Al-Khafsa LATTAKIA! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! Tall ! Ehsem ! ! ! ALEPPO !! Ziyara Ed-daman ! ! ! Maarrat An ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! Numan ! Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! Kafr ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar Ein Shat-ha! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! !! !! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! !Castle! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! ! ! ! ! Kafr ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Ramleh! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! P! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! Hamam ! !Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr !! ! El-oyoun! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! Harbanifse! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan!Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish Sibbeh ! ! ! !Oj! ! !! ! ! ! ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ein Sisniyyeh Elniser Bariqiyeh Shin Al Makhrim Jeb Nasra Ej-Jarrah Frequency of occurrenceHawash Kherbet HOMS ! P Never happens Tin Noor Tall Hadideh Homs ! SometimesKalakh Kareemeh! Common issue Farqalas ! Al Quasir LEBANONVery common issue Tadmor Qaryatein ! Raqama Not covered in analysis Hasyaa Qaryatein

ii. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

26% 26% 26% 29% 36% 38% 44% 44% 44%

53% 59% 54% 54% 49% 47% 40% 41% 49%

20% 15% 18% 16% 14% 14% 15% 15% 7%

0.7% 1.7% 1.5% 0.7% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 15 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION ISSUES

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

53% 53% 56% 60% 59% 67% 63% 63% 74%

25% 28% 38% 28% 30% 26% 26% 27% 18% 23% 13% 9% 11% 11% 9% 8% 6% 3% 1.1% 1.9% 1.9% 0.8% 0.5% 3.5% 0.3% 2.1% 0.3% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest frequency) disabilities frequency)

SEXUAL VIOLENCE i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

72% 72% 73% 78% 87% 88% 92% 90% 93%

21% 22% 18% 28% 13% 11% 7% 9% 7% 7% 6% 0% 1% 1% 4% 1% 1% 0% 0.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

SEXUAL HARASSMENT i. Percentage of communities by frequency of occurrence (across population groups and per population group)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

69% 69% 72% 74% 81% 88% 89% 84% 87%

22% 22% 20% 29% 11% 16% 10% 14% 11% 8% 5% 1% 1% 5% 2% 1% 2% 1% 0.3% 1.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.8% 0.3% 0.3% 0.5% Aggregated Aggregated Men Women Adolescent boys Adolescent girls Boys Girls Persons with (average (highest disabilities frequency) frequency)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 16 HAMA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

5. COPING MECHANISMS i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered in the analysis and number of communities reporting use of coping mechanism (i.e. used at least “sometimes” or more)

Total number of communities in Governorate Covered in the analysis Reported as used (at least sometimes) 553

369 371 380 372 359 356 347 346 299 314 261 205 181 144 130 149 0 Begging Children dropping out of Engaging in illegal Restricting movements of Relying on humanitarian Accessing community Local/community support Early marriage school to work activities (i.e theft, women and girls assistance services (community smuggling) centres, women centres)

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence Across population groups Graph a: Taking the highest frequency of occurrence at community level

0% 1% 0% 1% 19% 17% 30% 32% Never used 42% 36% 54% 51% 39% Always used 60% Sometimes used 48% Commonly used

Commonly used 51% 68% Sometimes used 33% 40% 62% 25% 15% Always used 12% Never used 6% 18% 5% 12% 9% 7% 1% 1% 2% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Graph b: Taking the average frequency of occurrence at community level

0% 1% 1% 2% 19% 17% 30% Never used 42% 36% 51% 40% 60% Always used Sometimes used 42% Commonly used

Commonly used 55% Sometimes used 49% 63% 57% 29% Always used 20% 40% Never used 37% 19% 56% 7% 3% 2% 12% 6% 0% 1% 0% 2% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community dropping out of illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support school to work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 17 HAMA GOVERNORATE COPING MECHANISMS

ii. Percentage of covered communities reporting the use of coping mechanisms by frequency of occurrence -contd By population groups

Men 0% 1% 0% 2% 17% 32% Never used 45% 39% Always used 74% Sometimes used 42% Commonly used 68% Commonly used 24% 58% Sometimes used 49% Always used 24% 17% Never used 2% 5% 0% 1% Begging Engaging in illegal Relying on Accessing community Local/community activities (i.e theft, humanitarian services (community support smuggling) assistance centres, women centres)

Women 0% 1% 1% 1% 18% 36% Never used 53% 40% Always used 72% 70% Sometimes used 40% Commonly used

Commonly used 24% 63% 58% Sometimes used

42% Always used 26% 29% 18% Never used 2% 1% 5% 0% 0% 1% Begging Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing community Local/community illegal activities movements of humanitarian services (community support (i.e theft, women and girls assistance centres, women smuggling) centres)

Boys 0% 1% 1% 2% 19% 24% 46% 34% 36% Never used 57% 64% Always used Sometimes used Commonly used 46% Commonly used 56% 65% 62% Sometimes used 13% 20% 31% 52% 40% Always used Never used 4% 12% 2% 2% 9% 0% 1% 0% Begging Children Early marriage Engaging in Relying on Accessing Local/community dropping out of illegal activities humanitarian community services support school to work (i.e theft, assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres)

Graph d: Girls 0% 1% 1% 1% 29% 30% 24% 34% 37% Never used 53% 67% Always used 79% Sometimes used Commonly used 46% Commonly used 48% 64% 61% Sometimes used 57% 38% 20% 28% 12% Always used 10% 21% Never used 7% 3% 9% 1% 9% 5% 1% 0% 2% Begging Children dropping Early marriage Engaging in Restricting Relying on Accessing Local/community out of school to illegal activities movements of humanitarian community services support work (i.e theft, women and girls assistance (community centres, smuggling) women centres)

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 18 iii. Map of top three coping mechanisms used per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Idleb Zarbah COPING MECHANISMS USED PER SUB-DISTRICT Hajeb Badama Saraqab Mhambal Ariha Abul Thohur ! LATTAKIA! ! ! Kansaba ! ! ! Khanaser ! ! Ehsem Tall ! ! ! ! Ed-daman ! ! IDLEB Maarrat ! ! ! ALEPPO Salanfa ! ! An Numan ! ! ! ! Ziyara! ! Al-Haffa ! ! Kafr Ein ! ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! Mzair'a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! ! ! ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha ! ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran ! ! Beit ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elshaqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! Kafr! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet ! ! ! ! Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! Sheikh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! !Badr ! ! Ein! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan Raslan ! ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Talbiseh ! ! Sibbeh ! ! ! ! Dreikish ! ! Mashta !! Oj Elhiu Taldu HOMS Ein Jeb Safita Qabu Elniser Ej-Jarrah Bariqiyeh Al Makhrim Sisniyyeh Nasra Shin Kherbet Homs Hawash Tin Noor Tall Kalakh Hadideh Coping mechanisms used (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Begging Children dropping out of school to work Early marriage Engaging in illegal activities (i.e theft, smuggling) Restricting movements of women and girls Relying on humanitarian assistance Communities where coping mechanisms used are Accessing community services (community centres, women centres) ! Covered Local/community support ! Not covered in the analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 19 HAMA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

6. MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS YES (movement restrictions are NO reported as (movement occurring) restrictions 155 are not reported as 38% occurring) 253 62% a.Causes of Movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions as occurring

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in the Governorate 553

408 406 404 407 404 408 408 408

108 87 42 97 83 88 79 104 0 Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of explosive Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents hazards concerned authorities

ii. Percentage of communities reporting causes of movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

74% 78% 76% 79% 78% 81% 75% 89%

18% 17% 19% 16% 18% 16% 15% 5% 9% 2% 1% 4% 2% 2% 2% 4% 4.2% 3.4% 2.7% 2.5% 0.7% 2.7% 0.5% 3.2% Activities of armed Checkpoints Curfews General violence Lack of identity Presence of Rules imposed by Screening processes groups documents explosive hazards concerned authorities iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific causes, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Activities of armed groups 70%

Screening processes 67%

General violence 63%

Checkpoints 57%

Presence of explosive hazards 57%

Lack of identity documents 55%

Rules imposed by concerned authorities 51%

Curfews 28%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 20 iv. Map of top three causes of movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Janudiyeh Idleb CAUSESRabeea OF MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT Zarbah Hajeb Badama Jisr-Ash-Shugur Mhambal Ariha Saraqab Abul ! ! ! ! Thohur Kansaba Ziyara! ! ! ! Ehsem Tall ! ! ! ALEPPO ! Ed-daman ! ! IDLEB Maarrat Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! An Numan ! ! ! ! ! ! Salanfa ! Kafr ! ! ! Sanjar ! Nobol ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! Kafr! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat Baramanet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Sheikh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern Badr ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish ! ! ! ! ! HOMS Jeb Mashta Oj ! !! Talbiseh Ej-Jarrah Safita Elhiu Ein Shin Qabu Taldu Al Makhrim Sisniyyeh Nasra Elniser Bariqiyeh Hawash Kherbet Tin Noor Homs

Causes of movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most General violence % communities Lack of identity documents in the sub-district) Communities where movement restrictions were Presence of explosive hazards Activities of armed groups ! Reported Rules imposed by concerned authorities Checkpoints ! NOT reported Screening processes Curfews ! Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 21 HAMA GOVERNORATE MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS

b. Population groups affected by movement restrictions i. Analysis coverage Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (as least sometimes) Total number of communities in Syria 553

395 396 396 396 396 396 396 396 395

52 100 78 98 80 82 99 99 87 0 Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving Women moving with Boys (<18) Men People without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion alone a companion documentation

ii. Percentage of communities reporting population groups affected by movement restrictions (by frequency of occurrence)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens

73% 78% 73% 77% 77% 73% 73% 75% 84%

22% 21% 19% 20% 17% 19% 17% 19% 12% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 2% 3% 2% 1% 0.5% 1.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.5% 2.0% 1.0% Persons with Girls (<18) moving Girls (<18) moving Women moving alone Women moving with a Boys (<18) Men People2.0% without civil IDPs disabilities alone with a companion companion documentation

iii. Percentage of communities reporting specific affected population groups, out of those reporting occurrence of movement restrictions

Girls (<18) moving alone 70%

Men 69%

People without civil documentation 69%

Women moving alone 69%

IDPs 61%

Boys (<18) 57%

Women moving with a companion 56%

Girls (<18) moving with a companion 55%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 22 iv. Map of top three population groups affected by movement restrictions per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Badama Zarbah POPULATION GROUPS AFFECTEDMhambal BY MOVEMENT RESTRICTIONS PER SUB-DISTRICT Tall Hajeb Rabeea Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Saraqab Abul Ed-daman ! Kansaba ! ! ! Thohur ! ! LATTAKIA ! ! ! Ehsem ! ! ! ! Khanaser ! ! Maarrat ! ! ! ! ! An Numan ALEPPO ! ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Ziyara ! Salanfa ! Kafr ! ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kafr! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Tell ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamam ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! ! ! ! Eastern ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyounEin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! Raslan Raslan ! ! ! HOMS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish ! Oj Mashta !! Talbiseh Jeb Safita Elhiu Taldu Ej-Jarrah Qabu Ein Al Makhrim Bariqiyeh Elniser Sisniyyeh Nasra Shin Homs Hawash Kherbet Tin Noor Population groups affected by movement restrictions (Top 3 reported by most % communities Girls moving with a companion in the sub-district) Women moving alone Communities where movement restrictions were Women moving with a companion Men ! Reported Persons without civil documentation Boys ! NOT reported IDPs Girls moving alone ! Not covered in analysis Persons with disabilities

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 23 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

7. PROTECTION SERVICES

i. Analysis coverage (Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting needs of protection services (i.e. “present but insufficient” or “not present but needed")

Covered in the analysis Reported as needed Total number of communities in the Govrenorate 553

360 370 366 370 366 361 365 371 360 367 363 356 305 302 288 278 274 266 268 263 246 227 203 182

0 Psychosocial support Care mechanisms for Explosive hazard risk Protection services forRecreational activities Community centres Services for persons Women and girls Psychosocial support Legal services for civil Legal services for Medical treatment for services elderly persons education children with disabilities centres for sexual/domestic documentation Housing, Land and sexual/domestic violence survivors Property issues violence survivors

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups Across population groups Graph a: Taking the most severe status of needs and presence

Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed

5% 7% 8% 17% 20% 19% 16% 17% 17% 16% 17% 22% 9% 9% 34% 9% 8% 8% 11% 9% 17% 16% 17% 9% 19% 10% 8% 22% 21% 13% 15% 17% 15%

35% 9% 31% 65% 65% 67% 62% 58% 65% 63% 57% 51% 42%

27% 26%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Graph b: Taking the average status of needs and presence

5% 7% 8% 17% 19% 16% 17% 17% 16% 20% 17% 22% 9% 9% 34% 9% 8% 8% 11% 9% 18% 16% 18% 10% 19% 9% 22% 22% 13% 15% 15% 18% 15%

36% 10% 32% 64% 66% 65% 62% 57% 62% 60% 58% 51% 41% 26% 24%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education civil documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual for children mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 24 HAMA GOVERNORATE PROTECTION SERVICES

ii. Percentage of communities reporting presence and needs of protection services across population groups - contd By population group

Men Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed

5% 7% 8% 17% 17% 16% 17% 19% 23% 11% 19% 9% 37% 10% 10% 19% 18% 17% 12% 18% 10% 22% 21% 12% 16% 18% 13% 9% 35% 31%

41% 63% 57% 27% 25% 63% 48% 57% 65% 58%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services for disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic elderly persons violence violence

Women

5% 7% 8% 17% 19% 16% 17% 16% 20% 17% 22% 9% 9% 34% 11% 10% 9% 16% 11% 19% 18% 17% 9% 9% 21% 22% 10% 15% 17% 15% 9% 35% 31%

42%

64% 62% 57% 26% 25% 65% 51% 61% 65% 58%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Recreational activities Care Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual mechanisms/services with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic for elderly persons violence violence

Boys Needed but not present Present but insufficient Present and sufficient Not present and not needed 5% 7% 17% 16% 17% 17% 16% 17% 20% 24% 9% 36% 9% 8% 8% 11% 17% 16% 9% 19% 14% 11% 21% 22% 16% 17% 14%

35% 9% 30%

41%

64% 57% 26% 24% 66% 50% 62% 64% 58%

Community centres Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support for Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons with education documentation Housing, Land and services survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence

Girls

5% 7% 17% 16% 17% 17% 16% 20% 17% 20% 24% 9% 34% 8% 8% 9% 9% 18% 16% 11% 9% 19% 13% 11% 8% 21% 23% 16% 17% 14% 9% 35% 30%

42% 65% 63% 57% 25% 24% 66% 51% 62% 64% 57%

Community centres Women and girls Explosive hazard risk Legal services for civil Legal services for Psychosocial support Psychosocial support Medical treatment for Protection services for Recreational activities Services for persons centres education documentation Housing, Land and services for survivors of sexual survivors of sexual children with disabilities Property issues violence/domestic violence/domestic violence violence

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 25 iii. Map of top three protection services needed per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting need)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as needed irrespective of presence. They are NOT indicative of the severity of need. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Rabeea Idleb Zarbah PROTECTION SERVICES NEEDED PER SUB-DISTRICT Hajeb Badama Jisr-Ash-Shugur Mhambal Ariha Saraqab Abul

! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba ! ! ! ! Ehsem Tall Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! Ed-daman ! Salanfa ! IDLEB Maarrat ! ! ! ! ALEPPO ! ! An Numan ! ! ! ! LATTAKIA Ziyara! ! ! Kafr Al-Haffa ! ! ! Sanjar ! Nobol ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! ! ! ! Tamanaah ! ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit ! ! ! Suran ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! Kafr! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! Badr ! El-oyoun! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! ! Jneinet ! ! !Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! Ar-Rastan ! ! Raslan !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish ! ! ! ! ! ! Oj Ein ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Elniser Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Bariqiyeh HOMS Jeb Al Makhrim Ej-Jarrah Sisniyyeh Nasra Shin Hawash Kherbet Tall Homs Tin Noor Kalakh Hadideh Farqalas Kareemeh Al Quasir

Protection services needed Psychosocial support services (Top 3 reported by most % communities Psychosocial support for survivors of sexual violence/domestic violence in the sub-district) Medical treatment for sexual/domestic violence survivors Community centres Protection services for children Communities where protection services are Women and girls centres ! Recreational activities Reported as needed Explosive hazard risk education ! Care mechanisms for elderly persons NOT reported as needed Legal services for civil documentation ! Services for persons with disabilities Not covered in analysis Legal services for Housing, Land and Property issues

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 26 HAMA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

8. CONCERNS/PROBLEMS DURING DELIVERY OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE

YES (concerns with humanitarian NO (concerns with assistance are humanitarian reported as assistance are not occurring), 164 , reported as 48% occurring) 178 , 52%

i. Analysis coverage

Number of communities covered by the analysis and number of communities reporting concerns regarding how humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months (by occurrence)

Covered in the analysis Reported as occurring (at least sometimes) Number of communities in the Governorate 164 reporting concerns with humanitarian assistance 162 155 156 145 145 148 147 129

36 18 17 16 0 Assistance given is not what the Request for civil documentation to Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is not Request of sexual favour/ community needs access assistance free/ Money is asked in exchange exploitation in exchange for for assistance humanitarian assistance

ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence a. Across population groups (For categories which required aggregation, highest frequency was adopted)

Very common issue Common issue Sometimes

80 43

36 31 23 14 11 18 16 13 - 2 - 2 - 1 - Assistance given is not what the Request for civil documentation Discrimination/exclusion Sexual harassment Humanitarian assistance is not Request of sexual favour/ community needs to access assistance free/ Money is asked in exploitation in exchange for exchange for assistance humanitarian assistance

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 27 HAMA GOVERNORATE CONCERNS WITH HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE ii. Number of covered communities reporting concerns reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last 3 months by frequency of occurrence - contd b. By population groups

Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian exchange for assistance assistance

14 14 13 12 16 13 6 2 2 2 2 3 - - -- 1 1 1 1 ---- Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

Request for civil documentation to access assistance Sexual harassment

81 85 73 70 16 17 11 35 33 24 24 5 - - -- 8 8 13 10 ---- Boys Girls Men Women Boys Girls Men Women

iii. Number of covered communities having reported discrimination as a concern reg. the way humanitarian assistance was delivered in the last three months identifying population groups affected by discrimination

Unaccompanied girls 18

Unaccompanied boys 16

Girls head of household 15

Boys head of household 15

Divorced women 14

Old persons 13

Women living alone 13

Widows 12

Women head of household 11

Men living alone 10

Persons with disabilities (HA) 6

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 28 iv. Map of top three concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance in the last three months per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Rabeea Idleb Zarbah CONCERNS WITH DELIVERYMhambal OF HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE PER SUB-DISTRICT Hajeb Badama Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Saraqab Abul

! Kansaba ! Thohur ! ! !Ziyara! ! LATTAKIA ! Ehsem ! ! Tall ! ! ALEPPO Khanaser ! Ed-daman ! Maarrat ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! An Numan ! ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Al-Haffa ! ! Kafr ! ! ! Sanjar ! Nobol Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mzair'a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Al-Qardaha ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah! Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! BeitEin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !Suran ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ElshaqiyehYashout ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Kafr! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh Wadi! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern ! ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! Badr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyounEin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! ! Jneinet ! ! !Halaqim! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! Ar-Rastan ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish ! Oj ! Mashta !! Talbiseh Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu HOMS Ein Jeb Bariqiyeh Ej-Jarrah Elniser Al Makhrim Sisniyyeh Nasra Shin Hawash Kherbet Homs Tall Tin Noor Kalakh Hadideh Kareemeh Farqalas

Concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance (Top 3 reported by most % communities in the sub-district)

Assistance given is not what the community needs Request for civil documentation to access assistance Humanitarian assistance is not free/ Money is asked in exchange for assistance Communities where concerns with delivery of humanitarian assistance are ! Request of sexual favour/ exploitation in exchange for humanitarian assistance Reported ! Sexual harassment NOT reported

! Discrimination/exclusion Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 29 HAMA GOVERNORATE CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

9. CIVIL DOCUMENTATION

a. Reasons for not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific reason for not having civil documentation, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation NO (lack/loss of documentation is not reported Lost 69% as occurring) Concerns of approaching authority 52% 104 , 26% YES (lack/loss of Expired document 50% documentatio n is reported Left behind when fleeing 44% as occurring) Could not afford it 39% 301 , 74% Never had it 39%

GoS Services not available 34%

Didn’t attempt to obtain it 26%

Counselling/legal services not available 24%

Another family member has possession of it 23%

Confiscated 22% b. Type of document that is not possible to be obtained in the community i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific document that was not possible to obtain in the community, out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Passport 52%

Syrian ID 51%

Marriage Certificate 48%

Deed/Tabou 46%

Family Booklet 46%

Travel authorisation document 45%

Birth Certificate 43%

Civil record (extract) 41%

Death Certificate 39%

Approval for lease agreement 38%

Residence support document 38%

Disability ID 36%

Divorce record 36% c. Impact of not having civil documentation i. Percentage of communities identifying a specific impact of not having civil documents,out of those reporting the occurrence of lack/loss of civil documentation

Restricted freedom of movement 81%

Cannot register land/access transactions 70%

Cannot register birth/marriage/death 65%

Cannot claim property 65%

Unable to access basic services 58%

Unable to access humanitarian assistance 52%

Arrest 42%

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 30 d. Map of top three reasons for not having civil documentation, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, basedcommunitiespercentagereporting eachthe of onsub-district, reportedoptions threethe top the in maps NOTE: the chartsonThepie illustrate option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart showschart wherepiesub-districts occurrence.the In frequency/severity asof occurring sometimes optionthe of ormore. Theyare NOT indicative more than three options, it means that all disp wereoptions layed all meansreportedchartwheresamepiesub-districts the that In communities.bypercentage it moreoptions, of three than s hows less than three options, it means that only disp meansonly wereoptions layed reported.that sit hows options, three less than

Janudiyeh Dark osh Sarmin Hadher Banan REASONS FOR NOT HAVING CIVIL DOCUMENTATIONIdleb PER SUB-DISTRICT As-Safira Zarbah Rabeea Hajeb Saraqab Badama Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Mhambal

! Abul LATTAKIA! Kansaba ! ! Thohur ! ! Tall ALEPPO ! ! ! Ehsem ! ! ! Ed-daman Khanaser ! ! ! Maarrat IDLEB ! ! ! Salanfa ! ! NumanAn ! ! ! Ziyara! ! Al-Haffa ! ! Kafr Ein ! ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mzair'a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tamanaah ! ! Berghal ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! Castle ! Al-Qard aha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elms eitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran ! ! Beit ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elshaqiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! Kafr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf ! ! ! ! ! ! Baramanet ! ! ! ! Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmashayekh ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh! ! ! El-oyoun Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Badr ! ! ! ! ! ! Halaqim Harbanifse ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet Raslan ! ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan Sibbeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oj Dreikish Mashta ! Talbiseh Jeb Ein HOMS Safita Elhiu Qabu Taldu Ej-Jarrah Elniser Makhrim Al Bariqiyeh Shin Sisniyyeh Nasra Kherbet Homs Tall Kalakh Tall Hawash Hadideh Noor Tin Reasons for not having civil documentation it obtain to attemp t Didn’t (Top 3 reported by most member Anotherfamily hasposs it essof ion % communities in the sub-district) Expireddocument Concernsapp of roachingauthority Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is Could not afford it afford Could not GoSavailable Services not ! Reported Confiscated Counselling/legal servicesavailable not Counselling/legal ! NOTreported Left behindwhen fleeing Left Neverhadit ! coveredanalysis Not in Lost

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 31 ii. Map of top three types of documents that are not possible to obtain in the community, per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence)

Rabeea Idleb Zarbah TYPES OF DOCUMENTS NOT POSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PER SUB-DISTRICT Hajeb Badama Jisr-Ash-Shugur Mhambal Ariha Saraqab Abul

! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba Ziyara! ! ALEPPO ! ! Ehsem ! ! Khanaser ! Tall ! ! ! Maarrat Ed-daman ! ! ! ! ! An Numan ! ! ! ! ! ! IDLEB Salanfa ! ! Kafr ! ! ! ! Nobol Sanjar ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! Tamanaah ! ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! Castle ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Suran ! Beit ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! Kafr! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HAMA ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza ! ! ! ! ! Tell ! ! ! ! Saboura! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hama ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh ! Wadi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! Badr ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyounEin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! Jneinet ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sibbeh ! ! ! ! ! Dreikish HOMS ! Jeb !! Oj Talbiseh Ein Ej-Jarrah Safita Nasra Taldu Al Makhrim TARTOUS Qabu Elniser Kherbet Bariqiyeh Hawash Shin Tin Noor Homs

Types of documents that are not possible to obtain (Top 3 reported Divorce record Passport by most % communities Family Booklet Travel authorisation document in the sub-district) Communities where lack/loss of civil documentation is Death Certificate Approval for lease agreement ! Reported Birth Certificate Disability ID Deed/Tabou ! NOT reported Civil record (extract) Syrian ID Residence support document ! Marriage Certificate Not covered in analysis

2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW 32 ETARONREVOG AMAH ETARONREVOG ,GNISUOH DNAL DNA YTREPORP SEUSSI

10. HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY ISSUES

a.Concerns regarding Housing, land and property (HLP) NO (HLP i. Percentage of communities, identifying specific HLP concerns, by frequency of occurrence, out of those issues are not reporting the occurrence of HLP issues. reported as occurring) YES (HLP Very common issue Common issue Sometimes Never happens , 183 , 48% issues are reported as , occurring) 27% 201 , 52% 31% 36% 32% 41% 47% 52% 59% 55%

57% 53% 66% 61% 53% 48% 42% 37% 37%

9% 8% 5% 6% 7% 4% 4% 4% 3% 2.3% 2.9% 0.6% 0.0% 1.2% 1.8% 2.3% 0.6% 3.5% Damage of land Looting of private Property is Disputed Rental disputes No housing Lack of Rules and Cannot or property property unlawfully ownership (landlord/tenant available documents processes on access/lost occupied by problems) housing and land access housing others not clear or because can changing afford it ii. Map of top three HLP concerns per sub-district (based on percentage of communities reporting occurrence) NOTE: The pie charts on the maps illustrate the top three options reported in the sub-district, based on the percentage of communities reporting each option as occurring sometimes or more. They are NOT indicative of the frequency/severity of occurrence. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows more than three options, it means that all displayed options were reported by the same percentage of communities. In sub-districts where the pie chart shows less than three options, it means that only displayed options were reported.

Badama Mhambal Zarbah HOUSING, LAND AND PROPERTY CONCERNS PER SUB-DISTRICT Tall Jisr-Ash-Shugur Hajeb Rabeea Ariha Saraqab Abul Ed-daman ! ! Thohur ! ! Kansaba Ziyara! ! ! ! Ehsem ! ! ! LATTAKIA! ! Salanfa ! Maarrat Khanaser ! ! ! ! ! An Numan ALEPPO ! ! ! ! Al-Haffa ! ! IDLEB ! Kafr ! ! ! Sanjar ! Nobol ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! Heish ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Et-teeneh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Jobet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Shat-ha ! ! ! ! ! ! Berghal ! ! ! ! Tamanaah ! ! Khan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Suqaylabiyah ! ! ! ! ! Shaykun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Madiq! Castle ! ! Al-Qardaha ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Hamra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Elmseitra ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Saan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Beit ! ! ! Suran ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Yashout ! Kafr! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Karnaz ! Dalyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Zeita ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qteilbiyyeh ! ! ! ! ! HAMA! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Muhradah ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anaza Tell ! ! ! ! Saboura ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Salhib ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tawahin ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Jeb ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ramleh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TARTOUS ! ! Hama ! ! ! ! ! ! As-Salamiyeh ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Qadmous ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Masyaf! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Oqeirbat Hamam ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wasil ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Sheikh! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wadi ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Eastern Badr ! ! !! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! El-oyoun ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bari ! ! ! ! ! Jneinet ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Harbanifse ! ! ! ! Halaqim ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Dweir ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ar-Rastan ! ! Raslan ! ! ! ! ! Oj! ! ! ! ! ! HOMS ! ! Jeb Dreikish ! ! ! ! ! Ein ! Ej-Jarrah Mashta !! Shin Taldu Talbiseh Al Makhrim Safita Elhiu Qabu Elniser Nasra Homs Housing, land and property concerns (Top 3 reported No housing available by most % communities Disputed ownership in the sub-district) Rental disputes (landlord/tenant problems) Communities where HLP issues are Lack of documents Property is unlawfully occupied by others ! Reported Damage of land or property Rules and processes on housing and land not clear or changing ! NOT reported Looting of private property Cannot access/lost access housing because can afford it ! Not covered in analysis

END OF HAMA GOVERNORATE ANALYSIS. CLICK HERE FOR THE 2018 PROTECTION NEEDS OVERVIEW V2 (NATIONAL OVERVIEW) 33