Impact of the Baby Boomer Generation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Impact of the Baby Chapter | 1 Boomer Generation ❖ How important are Boomers to the Texas economy? Not surprisingly, recent recessionary Introduction economic conditions have played havoc Americans born between 1946 and 1964 with Boomer retirement. Employers across — the Baby Boomers or “Boomers” — have Texas indicate that their Baby Boomer had a significant impact on national and workers are not retiring — for now. state demographics. History has shown the However, employers say they still worry enormous effect of this generation on social about an impending worker shortage once services, education and the labor market. older workers finally decide to retire. Now, as they ready for retirement, Boomers Meanwhile, people in their 30s and 40s pose concerns for workforce development have been flooding into the Lone Star and planning, corporate succession planning State in such huge numbers that the largest and the social safety net. generation of workers in Texas is now from While individual situations will vary Generation X. This is a uniquely Texas and personal finances will influence phenomenon. large numbers of Boomer decisions, Still, when the Boomer cohort demographic actuarial tables have been eventually begins large-scale retirement telling us that growing numbers of this from their primary jobs, the numerical demographic cohort could begin retiring in labor shortage is likely to be larger than any 2010. experienced during previous generational transitions. Bill Gates once suggested that the top programmers employed at Microsoft were anywhere from 30 to 300 times more productive than the ones with the fewest skills, least experience and little firm-specific know-how. CHAPTER 1 | 5 Worker Demographics in Texas, by Age Group 5 4 (in millions) 3 2 Number employed 1 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Born in 1930–1945 Born in 1965–1980 SOURCE : U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey Born in 1946–1964 Born in 1981–1994 Figure 1.1 end of the skills-based occupational | What’s Happening employment hierarchy retire, they will be The record number of births after harder to replace. Occupations involving World War II and the increased life complex nonroutine cognitive knowledge, expectancy as a result of medical advances abstract thinking, independent judgment have resulted in a disproportionally high or intricate and nonroutine manual skills percentage of older workers in today’s (e.g., surgeons, systems analysts) are more workforce. These workers will soon at risk of shortages. The supply of persons retire in record numbers. In lower skill with the requisite education, training, occupations, no significant reduction in know-how, and proficiencies is far smaller. output is anticipated when less-experienced While employers may treat turnover (due workers replace retiring Boomers. Job to retirement or other causes) in low-skill openings at the low end of the skill occupations as a trivial matter, they are spectrum won’t stay vacant very long likely to want to retain the services of their because there is no shortage of people who hard-to-replace senior knowledge workers meet the minimum requirements for these who add significant value. jobs, which demand routine manual tasks On the flip side of this argument, and little cognitive knowledge. New hires age and tenure are not necessarily the shouldn’t take long to become proficient at determining factors in productivity among these jobs because the required tasks can be knowledge workers, so it’s rational for mastered after a short demonstration, and employers to let some of their older the pace of work and the work activities knowledge workers retire, even if they are set for them by workflow design (e.g., are somewhat more productive than the customer-initiated orders at fast-food companywide or industry average. That establishments). they may generate more output or add However, when workers at the high more value than their younger co-workers 6 | CHAPTER 1 may be offset by seniority- or longevity- “You’re experiencing something so based wage premiums, the higher cost of different from the rest of the country, providing “senior” health care coverage, or Texas is really an anomaly,” said Rebecca their disruptive effects on the productivity Ryan, economist and generations expert of others (e.g., presumed resistance to with Next Generation Consulting in change, technophobia, personality clashes Madison, Wisconsin. She said the most with younger workers, resentment from likely immediate result within the Texas having to report to younger supervisors). work environment is “stagnation” at work For now, Census Bureau analysis of the — where older workers hold on to their workers in the Lone Star State from 2008 jobs and younger workers in Generation X shows that Texas has a unique situation and the Millennial generation (those born with four generations in the workforce at 1981 to 1994, also called Generation Y) the same time: become frustrated as their careers stall due to congestion of upper level jobs with older • Silent Generation (born 1930 to 1945 workers. and making up 4% of Texas workers) “Boomers are scared as their retirement • Baby Boomers (born 1946 to 1964 and plans are in flux. Generation X and making up 36% of Texas workers) Millennials are seeing their career plans • Generation X (born 1965 to 1980 and on hold because those positions ahead of making up 38% of Texas workers) them are not opening up because people • Generation Y or Millennials (born aren’t moving on,” Ryan said. “While the 1981 to 1994 and making up 22% of average age of workers in other states has Texas workers) been drifting up, Texas seems to be getting A national survey by the Pew Research younger. This will probably mitigate some Center found that Baby Boomers say they of the worker shortage in Texas when older are opting to delay their retirement by workers retire.” several years. If Baby Boomers and even Silent Generation workers delay their retirement by about five years, then the | The Data Texas workforce that is already congested with four generations working together Texas is generally regarded as a young could become more congested this decade. state, a perception buoyed by the median Meanwhile, a unique situation unfolded age of the population, which is 33.2 years, in 2008 as Generation X surpassed the or 3.5 years younger than the nation as a Baby Boomer generation for the largest whole, according to the Census Bureau. number of workers in Texas, according to Almost 28% of the Texas population is the Census Bureau (see Figure 1.1). younger than 18, which is more than 3 “You’re experiencing something so different from the rest of the country, Texas is really an anomaly.“ — Rebecca Ryan, Next Generation Consulting in Madison, Wisconsin CHAPTER 1 | 7 years younger than the national average. (know-how) they’ve accumulated over so A younger and growing population is many years on the job. More than 29% largely viewed as a positive sign for future of Boomers have a Bachelor’s degree or economic prosperity. higher, making them the most highly But Texas is also home to 5.2 million educated cohort in American history. Baby Boomers, roughly 29.1% of the White men, who comprise the largest 16-and-older population, who comprise group of retiring Boomers, attained about one third of the state’s civilian labor more education than most groups in the force. Though that percentage is lower replacement pool of workers. Older white than the national average (78.2 million men also accumulated vast amounts of tacit Baby Boomers nationwide comprise 31.7% knowledge acquired through many years of of the noninstitutionalized 16-and-older on-the-job learning. population, or labor force eligible), it Employers say that replacing Baby represents an entire generation of Texas Boomers is already proving to be a workers about to retire. problem. Multiple surveys of human These numbers do not tell the whole resources managers show that newer story. In 1964, Boomers represented nearly workers often lack the specialized 40% of the U.S. population and about education or appropriate college degrees 35.9% of the national civilian labor force. and even lack adeptness with “workplace To visualize their enormous demographic fundamentals.” The characteristics of the impact, imagine the noticeable bulge younger Generation X and Generation of a pig passing through a python that Y further concern employers. These swallowed it whole. younger generations include more female workforce members. Though these women The numerical effects of Boomer have high rates of college degrees, they retirement are compounded when lack degrees in scientific and engineering compared with skill shortages. “Baby fields. The younger generations also have Boomers are going to be retiring in droves high proportions of Hispanic and African- starting with the end of this decade,” said Americans populations, which in the past Arlene Dohm, an economist with the have had below average graduation rates Bureau of Labor Statistics in Washington, for high school and college. These patterns D.C. “There are certain industries and provided much of the impetus for the professions that are going to be hit very Texas “Closing the Gaps” initiative, which hard.” encourages more young Texans to attend As they moved from infancy into college. adulthood, Boomers in sequence In the wake of an increasingly strained the capacity of public education, competitive global economy, companies’ postsecondary education, the labor focus on the bottom line also affects the market, and the housing market. Today, future of the talent pool. After years of they are the largest cohort in the labor downsizing through layoffs of middle force. As Boomers exit the workforce, managers and technical and professional they will strain the Social Security system. workers, employers are growing anxious Meanwhile, the economy will lose their to find appropriate successors.
Recommended publications
  • A History of the Baby Boomers

    A History of the Baby Boomers

    Book reviews Renewing the Family: A History of the Baby Boomers by Catherine Bonvalet, Céline Clément, and Jim Ogg New York: Springer Press 2015 ISBN: 978-3-319-08544-9 Hardcover, $129.00, 240 pp. Reviewed by Rosemary Venne Edwards School of Business, University of Saskatchewan Renewing the Family: A History of the Baby Boomers represents a comprehensive examination of the baby boom generation in the context of family relations over the postwar period, charting the generation’s entire life cycle with a French and British comparative analysis of the first wave of the boom. This volume is part of a series of publications devoted to population studies and demography by the French National Institute for Demography (INED, Paris). The 2015 English version of the book is said to have some minor differences from the French edition, which was originally published in 2011. The authors, all based in France, are Catherine Bonvalet, a researcher at INED, Céline Clément, a researcher from Universite Paris (Ouest Nanterre), and Jim Ogg a sociologist and researcher at Caisse Nationale D’Assurance Vieillesse (CNAV) in Paris. This book is in the tradition of Great Expectations: America and the Baby Boom Generation by Landon Jones (1980), The Lyric Generation: the Life and Times of the Baby Boomers by François Ricard (1994), and Born at the Right Time: A History of the Baby-Boom Generation by Doug Owram (1996). The first book, Great Expectations, can be characterized as describing the American baby-boom generation from its babyhood until early adulthood, while the second can be described as an examination of the early wave of the baby boom and the societal changes in Canada, with an emphasis on the province of Quebec.
  • How Generations Feel When Brands Take a Stand

    How Generations Feel When Brands Take a Stand

    How Generations Feel When Brands Take a Stand ©Copyright 2018 Quester The Set-Up Quester is in the process of conducting a new joint project with 747 Insights and Collaborata: GENERATION NATION 2019: Defining America’s Gen Z, Millennials, Generation X and Boomers This study provides a comparison of attitudes and behaviors across these four cohorts, to expand upon current intelligence and cut to the core of what it means to be an American in 2019. Aided by technology, media, politics, and more, we can see Generational values shifting at a faster pace than we’ve ever seen before. One of the discussion areas centered around perceptions of whether brands should take a stand on social and political issues … So Let’s Recap Generation Nation - Should Brands Take a Stand? GEN Z MILLENNIALS They probably shouldn’t. It depends. It could cause tension, and employees may not Maybe … if it’s not too agree. extreme But it could be okay if it’s not offensive and they really believe in it. GEN X BOOMERS It’s not really my It’s their right, but they business – they can if might lose business. they want to. They probably shouldn’t do it. Unless But it’s probably not for it’s something really the right reasons. non-controversial. Generation Nation Brand Completion So we asked all of those questions about general brand perspective and Brand thoughts! finished all of the discussions. The Best Laid Plans … And then— one week later … The Reaction So we went back in and talked to about 100 people in each generation.
  • What Makes a Leader Effective? U.S. Boomers, Xers, and Millennials Weigh In

    What Makes a Leader Effective? U.S. Boomers, Xers, and Millennials Weigh In

    WHITE PAPER - News and Insight for Learning, Development and HR Leaders What Makes a Leader Effective? U.S. Boomers, Xers, and Millennials Weigh In By Jennifer J. Deal, Sarah Stawiski, William A. Gentry, and Kristin L. Cullen Contents Introduction 3 Generational Cohorts 4 Survey Results: 5 What Makes a Leader Effective? Developing Leaders for All Generations 11 Conclusion 12 About the Research 13 Endnotes 13 About the Authors 14 Introduction Conventional wisdom suggests Generations at Work in the USA that Baby Boomers, Gen Xers, and Millennials in the United States are Most of the workforce in the U.S. is made up of three fundamentally different from one generations: Baby Boomers (born 1946 to 1963), Gen Xers another. And certainly there are (born 1964 to 1979), and Millennials (born after 1980).1,2,3 real differences—including the The post-war generation was called the Baby Boom way we dress, the way we consume because of the rapid increase in birth rate at the end of information, the music we listen World War II. Baby Boomers weren’t born when WWII to, and ideas about appropriate ended, but experienced post-war prosperity that resulted personal behavior. in middle-class Americans having access to utilities such Many organizational leaders are as central heating, running hot water, household anticipating a substantial upheaval appliances, televisions, and automobiles. Though during in work culture and expectations as their youth Baby Boomers were thought of as being more Millennials enter the workforce anti-authority,4 currently they are typically characterized and more Baby Boomers retire. But as materialistic workaholics who are at the top of the will there need to be wholesale authority structure, and are focused on their own personal changes in how leaders need to fulfillment, acquisition of things, status, and authority.5,6,7 behave to be effective? Generation X is the cohort born in the U.S.
  • Measuring and Explaining the Baby Boom in the Developed World in the Mid-20Th Century

    Measuring and Explaining the Baby Boom in the Developed World in the Mid-20Th Century

    DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH VOLUME 38, ARTICLE 40, PAGES 1189-1240 PUBLISHED 27 MARCH 2018 http://www.demographic-research.org/Volumes/Vol38/40/ DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.40 Research Article Measuring and explaining the baby boom in the developed world in the mid-20th century Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte © 2018 Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte. This open-access work is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Germany (CC BY 3.0 DE), which permits use, reproduction, and distribution in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are given credit. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/de/legalcode. Contents 1 Introduction 1190 2 Data and methodology 1191 2.1 Fertility indicators used 1191 2.2 Measurement of timing and volume 1192 3 Descriptive analysis of the timing and volume of the TBB 1194 4 What had the greatest impact on the TBB, the rise in marital 1202 fertility or the rise in nuptiality? 5 Descriptive analysis of the timing and volume of the BBM 1208 6 Explaining the BBM 1212 6.1 Previous explanations 1212 6.2 An alternative explanation: A new research proposal (back to the 1215 economic factors) 7 Conclusions 1221 8 Acknowledgments 1222 References 1223 Appendix 1229 Demographic Research: Volume 38, Article 40 Research Article Measuring and explaining the baby boom in the developed world in the mid-20th century Jesús J. Sánchez-Barricarte1 Abstract BACKGROUND The early research on the baby boom tried to account for it as a logical recovery following the end of the Second World War (WWII).
  • Life As a Baby Boomer

    Life As a Baby Boomer

    Chapter 6 Life as a Baby Boomer Red Diaper Baby At the outset of the classic 60’s film Yellow Submarine, a cartoon Ringo Starr, heads down, hands in his pockets, walking across the screen muttering over and over to himself in a sad resigned voice nothing ever happens to me … nothing ever happens to me… That was me. At least it was a part of me that I was conscious of and I distinctly remember it even now, many years since. It was before the Beatles, including Ringo, the 1950’s had ended and the sixties had literally begun, 1960, 1961,1962, and I and was getting impatient to get on with it, go to high school. The huge fins growing out of ever-longer and longer automobiles were becoming passé, and the custom of buying a brand-new car every single year, trading in of course the old one, was being replaced by an exodus to the suburbs where cars properly belonged. A decade before, the automobile had already pushed out the trolleys in Newark, where I grew up, so that I only knew their obsolete tracks, the way our 1952 green Desoto skidded when we drove on Clinton Avenue. I was born in 1949 the quintessential early baby boomer, now entering the early years of the baby boomers’ grand entry into Medicare and Social Security. It will go on for the next several decades until there are no more to enter, no one left alive born before 1965. One of my first memories is sitting in front of a TV at a neighbor’s house, the one on my block among the first to buy a TV set, it being heavily marketed immediately in the New York area.
  • PATTERNS of DISCONTENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT in IRAN? by Michael Rubin and Patrick Clawson *

    PATTERNS of DISCONTENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT in IRAN? by Michael Rubin and Patrick Clawson *

    PATTERNS OF DISCONTENT: WILL HISTORY REPEAT IN IRAN? By Michael Rubin and Patrick Clawson * While international attention is focused on Iran’s nuclear program and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s bombast, Iranian society itself is facing turbulent times. Increasingly, patterns are re-emerging that mirror events in the years before the Islamic revolution. These include political disillusionment, domestic protest, government failure to match public expectations of economic success, and labor unrest. Nevertheless, the Islamic regime has learned the lessons of the past and is determined not to repeat them, even as political discord crescendos. This essay is derived from the authors’ recent book, Eternal Iran: Continuity and Chaos (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2005). Mahmud Ahmadinejad’s victory in Iran’s Ahmadinejad’s 2003 election as mayor of 2005 Presidential elections shocked both Tehran. Iranians and the West. “Winner in Iran calls The election of Ahmadinejad was only the for Unity; Reformists Reel,” headlined The latest in a series of surprises that Iran has New York Times.1 Most Western produced in recent decades. Indeed, a review governments assumed that former President of Iran's history over the last thirty years and Expediency Council chairman Ali Akbar suggests that Iran excels at surprising its own Hashemi Rafsanjani would win. 2 Many people and the world. This does not mean academics also were surprised. Few paid any that history will be repeated. But it is worth heed to the former blacksmith’s son who rose bearing in mind that nearly three decades to become mayor of Tehran. Brown after the shah's grip on power began to falter, University anthropologist William O.
  • Women's Education and Cohort Fertility During the Baby Boom

    Women's Education and Cohort Fertility During the Baby Boom

    Women’s Education and Cohort Fertility during the Baby Boom Jan Van Bavel, Martin Klesment, Eva Beaujouan and (in alphabetical order) Zuzanna Brzozowska, Allan Puur, David Reher, Miguel Requena, Glenn Sandström, Tomas Sobotka, Krystof Zeman Abstract While today, women exceed men in terms of participation in advanced education, female enrollment rates beyond primary education were still very low in the first half of the 20th century. In many Western countries, this started to change around mid-century, with the proportion of women obtaining a degree in secondary education and beyond increasing steadily. The expected implication of rising female education was fertility decline and the postponement of motherhood. Yet, many countries experienced declining ages at first birth and increasing total fertility instead. How can we reconcile these fertility trends with women’s increasing participation in education? Using census and large survey data for the USA and fourteen European countries, this paper analyzes trends in cohort fertility underlying the Baby Boom and how they relate to women’s educational attainment. The focus is on quantum components of cohort fertility and parity progression, and their association with the age at first childbearing. We find that progression to higher parities continued to decline in all countries, in line with fertility transition trends that started back in the nineteenth century. However, in countries experiencing a Baby Boom, this was more than compensated by decreasing childlessness and parity progression after the first child, particularly among women with education beyond the primary level. As a result, the proportions having exactly two children went up steadily in all countries and all educational groups.
  • Quickstats: Expected Number of Births Over a Woman's Lifetime

    Quickstats: Expected Number of Births Over a Woman's Lifetime

    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report QuickStats FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS Expected Number of Births over a Woman’s Lifetime* — National Vital Statistics System, United States, 1940–2018 4.0 3.5 n a m 3.0 o w r e p Replacement rate s 2.5 h t r i b d 2.0 e t c e p x E 1.5 Baby boomers Generation X Generation Y Generation Z born born (Millennials) born born 0 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 Year * The total fertility rate (TFR), the expected number of births that a woman would have over her lifetime, is the sum of the birth rates for women by 5-year age groups for ages 10–49 years in a given year, multiplied by 5 and expressed per woman. During 1940–2018, the expected number of births a woman would have over her lifetime, the TFR, was highest for women during the post- World War II baby boom (births during 1946–1964). In 1957, the TFR reached a peak of 3.77 births per woman. The TFR generally declined for the birth cohort referred to as Generation X from 2.91 in 1965 to 1.84 in 1980. For the birth cohorts referred to as Millennials (Generation Y) and Generation Z, the TFR first increased to 2.08 in 1990 and then remained generally stable until it began to decline in 2007. By 2018, the expected number of births per women fell to 1.73, a record low for the nation.
  • Controversy 11

    Controversy 11

    Controversy 11 AGING BOOMERS Boom or Bust? WHO ARE THE BOOMERS? When you hear the word “Boomer,” what do you think of? Who are the Boomers, actually? It’s important to give an answer to both questions. On the one hand, we need to consider the subjective associations we have with the word “Boomer.” On the other hand, we need to consider verifiable facts. The term “Boomer” easily evokes stereotypes. Stereotypes are con- veyed by many of the names given to Boomers over the years, labels such as “The Pepsi Generation,” “The Me Generation,” or “The Sixties Generation.” These phrases convey con- sumerism, narcissism, rebellion, and openness to change. Even the original term “Baby Boomer” doesn’t seem quite right because people in this generation aren’t babies anymore. The oldest of the Boomers are already receiving Social Security benefits, and many others are thinking seriously about retirement. Some facts are clear. There were 77 million people born in the United States between the years 1946 and 1964, and this group of people is generally referred to as the generation of the Boomers. We can see this group graphically displayed as a bulge in the population pyramid featured here. As the Boomer generation moves through the life course, as they grow older, this demographic fact will have big implications over the coming decades. But here we should pause to consider several interrelated questions. What does the term “generation” really mean? Do all individuals who fit into this demographic group form a single “generation”? Are there traits they share in common? Conversely, are there differences among members of the Boomer generation? This is but one set of questions we need to consider.
  • Baby Boom Migration and Its Impact on Rural America

    Baby Boom Migration and Its Impact on Rural America

    United States Department of Agriculture Baby Boom Migration Economic Research Service and Its Impact on Economic Research Report Number 79 Rural America August 2009 John Cromartie and Peter Nelson da.gov .us rs .e w Visit Our Website To Learn More! w w You can find additional information about ERS publications, databases, and other products at our website. www.ers.usda.gov National Agricultural Library Cataloging Record: Cromartie, John Baby boom migration and its impact on rural America. (Economic research report (United States. Dept. of Agriculture. Economic Research Service) ; no. 79) 1. Baby boom generation—United States. 2. Migration, Internal—United States. 3. Rural development—United States. 4. Population forecasting—United States. I. Nelson, Peter. II. United States. Dept. of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. III. Title. HB1965.A3 Photo credit: John Cromartie, ERS. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
  • Boomers & Millennials

    Boomers & Millennials

    The Python Now Has Two Pigs Boomers & Millennials Michael Luis September 2015 The Python Now Has Two Pigs Boomers & Millennials The Baby Boom generation has long been known as the “Pig in the Python,” gradually moving through its demographic phases, and influencing nearly every aspect of life, with its outsized impact on neighborhoods and schools, then employment and now, retirement systems. The Boomers, born between 1945 and 1964 were influenced by dramatic changes in technology and social patterns, and exhibited tastes and values often quite different from their parents. The size of this group, and its relatively large spending power, intrigued marketers from the beginning, and the purchasing patterns of Boomers have been the subject of constant research. As seen in Figure 1 (next page), the Baby Boom would be a larger cohort, when accounting for came to an end in the mid-1960s, and was immigration of Boomer-age parents. followed by the “Birth Dearth” or the “Baby Bust,” often referred to as Generation X. The The python how has a second pig working fall in birth rates has complex origins, but its way along, and as might be predicted, the whatever the cause, the generation that was generation that follows the Millennials—the born between the mid-1960s and the early children of Generation X—is again smaller. 1980s was much smaller. It got the attention of social scientists, but had less interest for As with their parents, the Millennials have marketers, simply because it was smaller. caught the attention of the marketing world which is quite eager to figure out how to sell Then, beginning in the late 1970s, those Baby things to this huge cohort.
  • BETWEEN CREATION and CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, and BODIES AFTER STALIN by Brandon Gray Miller a DISSERTATION Su

    BETWEEN CREATION and CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, and BODIES AFTER STALIN by Brandon Gray Miller a DISSERTATION Su

    BETWEEN CREATION AND CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, AND BODIES AFTER STALIN By Brandon Gray Miller A DISSERTATION Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of History – Doctor of Philosophy 2013 ABSTRACT BETWEEN CREATION AND CRISIS: SOVIET MASCULINITIES, CONSUMPTION, AND BODIES AFTER STALIN By Brandon Gray Miller The Soviet Union of the 1950s and 1960s existed in a transitional state, emerging recently from postwar reconstruction and on a path toward increasing urbanity, consumer provisioning, and technological might. Modernizing rhetoric emphasized not only these spatial and material transformations, but also the promise of full-fledged communism’s looming arrival. This transformational ethos necessitated a renewal of direct attempts to remold humanity. Gender equality—or, at the very least, removing bourgeois strictures on women—remained a partially unfulfilled promise. Technological advances and the development of Soviet industrial capacity offered a new means of profoundly altering the lives of Soviet men and women. As other scholars have noted, Soviet women were the most obvious targets of these campaigns, but they were not alone in these projects. This dissertation argues that the Soviet state also directed intensive campaigns to remodel male consumptive and bodily practices in order to rid them of politically and socially destructive tendencies, making them fit for the modern socialist civilization under construction. Rooted in, but divergent from, Bolshevik novyi byt campaigns and Stalinist kul’turnost efforts, Soviet authorities actively sought to craft productive male citizens of a modern mold freed of the rough and coarse habits associated with working-class and village masculinities. Many of men targeted in these campaigns fell short of these stated aims.