DOCSLIB.ORG

Cover Page (English)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cover Page (English) Government of India Ministry of Finance PROGRESS OF THE ACTION TAKEN PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF JOINT PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEE ON STOCK MARKET SCAM AND MATTERS RELATING THERETO December 2003 INTRODUCTION The Report of the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Stock Market Scam and matters relating thereto was presented to the Parliament on 19th December 2002. In para 3.31, the JPC recommended that the Government should present its Action Taken Report to the Parliament within six months and thereafter a progress report every six months until action on all the recommendations has been fully implemented to the satisfaction of Parliament. The Government had submitted Action Taken Report to the Parliament on 9.5.2003. JPC had made 276 recommendations. In the ATR, the recommendations were listed ad- seriatim alongwith the response of the Government in a columnar fashion. In the ATR, final response of the Government in respect of 111 recommendations/observations/conclusions had been given. The Progress Report lists remaining 165 recommendations ad-seriatim alongwith response of the Government as given in the ATR and further progress after the presentation of the ATR, including final response on further 39 recommendations. I N D E X Sl. No. Para. No. Subject in brief Page Nos. 1. 2.8 Role of the Ministry of Finance and other regulatory authorities. 1 2. 2.15 Nexus between brokers, banks and corporate houses. 2-4 3. 2.16 Need for applying more specific and effective mechanisms by the regulatory bodies. 5 4. 2.17 Lack of will to implement the suggestions of the previous JPC. 5-8 5. 2.20 Large scale manipulations by financial institutions and non-accountability in financial sector. 8-9 6. 2.21 Apathy and failure of regulatory bodies in exercising prudent supervision of stock market and banking transactions. 9-11 7. 3.11 Need to set up adequate number of courts to ensure speedy disposal of cases. 11-12 8. 3.14 Non-functioning of the Special Cell and action required to be taken. 12 9. 3.18 Disposal of disciplinary proceedings. 12-13 10. 3.21 Dual control and the role of RBI. 13-15 11. 3.22 Lack of concern and strict action by RBI. 15-23 12. 3.29 Monitoring, Surveillance of CSE. 23-26 13. 3.30 Lack of implementation of recommendations. 26 14. 3.31 Recommendation of the Committee. 26-27 15. 3.32 Casual approach of the MOF in implementation/monitoring the recommendations of last JPC’s. 27 16. 3.33 List of recommendation of previous JPC which are analogous. 27 17. 4.42 Modus operaendi of Shri Ketan Parekh. 28-30 18. 4.44 Swiss Bank accounts of Shri Ketan Parekh. 30-31 19. 4.45 Action to recover dues from Ketan Parekh entities. 31 20. 4.68 Proceedings against defaulters brokers. 31-33 21. 4.69 Criminal proceedings initiated against Shri H.C. Biyani. 33-34 22. 4.70 Transactions of H.C.Biyani with SHCIL. 34 23. 4.117 Irregularities in SHCIL. 34-38 24. 4.131 Irregularities in SHCIL. 38 25. 4.132 Action on the measure suggested by the inquiry against SHCIL. 38-39 26. 4.133 Prudential norms to be followed by SHCIL. 39 27. 5.55 Need for introducing a system of alerts in case of unusual market behavior. 39-40 28. 5.59 Violation of the RBI guidelines by the MMCB. 40-41 29. 5.62 Duality of control. 41 30. 5.63 Dubious role played by auditors. 41 31. 5.64 Expeditious disposal of criminal cases against Administrator, MMCB & Ors. 42 32. 5.66 Recommendations regarding MMCB and similar cooperative banks. 42-46 33. 5.109 Irregularities in the City Cooperative Banks Ltd., Lucknow. 46-50 34. 5.110 - do - 50-51 35. 5.111 Laxity on the part of apex. regulators –the RBI and RCS. 51-52 36. 5.112 Action against the erring executives of CCBL. 52 37. 5.113 Recommendations of the JPC. 52-53 (ii) Sl. No. Para. No. Subject in brief Page Nos. 38. 5.158 Diversion of funds and the cases before DRT. 53-54 39. 5.159 Action against CCBL. 54 40. 5.174 Violation of rules/ norms by BOI and the observations of the JPC. 54-58 41. 5.175 Recommendation of the JPC – action against officials of BOI. 58-59 42. 5.195 Irregularities relating to the Nedungadi Bank. 59 43. 5.196 Failure of RBI to take timely notice of irregularities in the Nedungadi Bank. 60 44. 5.197 Recommendations of the Committee. 60-62 45. 5.212 Persons holding executive position in the Stock Exchanges operating in the share market. 62-64 46. 5.213 Collusion between the CSE and IndusInd Bank. 64 47. 5.214 Recommendation of the JPC. 65 48. 5.223 Violations of the RBI regulations by the Centurion Bank. 65 49. 6.94 Involvement of Banks in the payment crisis in CSE. In action of CSE and SEBI. 66-69 50. 6.96 Violation of exposure of limits by brokers. 70 51. 6.97 Software bug in CSE. 70-71 52. 6.98 Responsibility of CMC Ltd. in software bug in CSE. 71 53. 6.99 Deactivating of trading terminal of brokers. 71-73 54. 6.101 CSE failed to enforce its own rules concerning trading and carry forward limits. 73-78 55. 6.104 Proactive role by SEBI in the affairs of CSE. 78-79 56. 6.105 Demutualisation of the Exchanges. 79 57. 6.106 Criminal action against broker directors. 79-85 58. 6.149 Review of surveillance function of Stock Exchanges. 85 59. 6.150 Demutualisation of the Exchanges. 86 60. 6.151 Action against the then ED of BSE. 86-87 61. 6.153 Role and function of SEBI nominee directors in Stock Exchange. 87-88 62. 7.3 Functioning of Special Cell. 88 63. 7.4 Investigating role of promoters and corporate entities. 88-89 64. 7.51 Expeditious action on involvement of promoters/corporate houses in manipulation of prices of scrips. 90 65. 7.53 Corrective measures on professional allotment and private placement. 91 66. 7.54 Non-availability of required support from concerned regulatory and marketing bodies to make purposeful recommendation on nexus of corporate bodies-brokers banks and other. 92 67. 8.76 Action against OCB’s and FII’s. 92-93 68. 8.77 Need for a comprehensive analysis by RBI of the foreign exchange inflow-outflow by OCBs over a period. 93-94 69. 8.78 Failure of RBI’s monitoring in detecting violation of the guidelines by OCBs. 94 70. 8.79 Clear policy guidelines about the responsibility to monitor OCBs. 95-97 71. 8.80 Review the ban imposed on OCBs and clearly lay down responsibility to a particular agency to oversee OCB operation. 97-98 72. 8.81 Misuse of participatory notes route by sub-accounts of FIIs. 98 73. 9.27 Non-compliance of inspection finding of SEBI by Stock Exchanges. 99-100 74. 9.28 Non-compliance of inspection finding of SEBI by CSE. 100 (iii) Sl. No. Para. No. Subject in brief Page Nos. 75. 9.29 Augmentation of staff strength by SEBI and increase its coverage of inspection of brokers. 100-101 76. 9.30 SEBI should strengthen its in house system and infrastructure and make optimum use of modern technology for carrying out focused inspection. 102 77. 9.31 Role of Eds/ nominee director in Stock exchanges vis-à-vis demutualisation. 102-103 78. 9.44 Centralised surveillance mechanism in all the exchanges. 103-104 79. 9.73 SEBI’s failure to take timely action. 104-108 80. 9.75 SEBI should view consolidated information of trades across all exchanges and generate its own alerts. 108 81. 9.76 Surveillance system in SEBI and Stock exchanges should be examined. 108-109 82. 9.77 Professional manpower in SEBI. 109 83. 9.78 Timely alert by regulators. 110 84. 9.79 Learning from past failures for improving market surveillance. Future dangers. 110-112 85. 9.125 Expedite corporatisation and demutualisation. 113 86. 9.126 Demutualisation should contain a judicious blend of the best elements. 113 87. 9.127 SEBI should extend its proactive supervision on the functioning of the subsidiaries and keep constant vigil. 113-114 88. 9.138 Reduction of settlement cycle to T+1 system to all scrips. 114-115 89. 9.158 SEBI should formulate a clear policy on short sales. 115 90. 9.159 Restrictions on stock lending by approved institutions. 115-116 91. 9.160 Proper segregation of cash and derivatives sectors. 116-117 92. 10.11 Observations regarding amending Chartered Accountants’ Act 1949. 117 93. 10.31 Need for regulators to take pre-emptive steps. 117 94. 10.72 Lack of interest by RBI in making the systemic changes proposed in the ATRs on the last JPCs report. 118 95. 10.74 Inaction on the part of the MOF and the regulators in effective regulation of foreign funds. 118-119 96. 10.75 Eternal vigilance and deterrent punishment- watchword of the regulator. 119 97. 10.76 Expeditious disposal of the RBIs proposals and review of existing laws by MOF. 119-121 98. 10.77 Need for improvement in the supervisory strategy and establishment of uniform banking standards. 121-122 99. 10.78 Improving financial supervision over banks. 122-123 100. 10.79 - do - 123-124 101. 10.80 Suggestions for setting up independent board for ensuring quality audit to strengthening of penal provisions against auditors. 124-125 102. 10.81 Suggestions for strengthening the vigilance machinery in Banks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Role of Corporate Goverance and Sebi : a Critical Analysis
    Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology Issn No : 1006-7930 ROLE OF CORPORATE GOVERANCE AND SEBI : A CRITICAL ANALYSIS Dr. Neetu Prakash Assistant Professor, Guru Nanak Khalsa College for Women, Model Town, Ludhiana ABSTRACT Corporate frauds or financial crimes or financial frauds can be classified as white-collar crimes, which represent the illegal acts that are characterized by deceit, concealment or violation of trust. The fraudulent exercises practiced by Enron, WorldCom and Martha Steward shook the world. Of these scandals, the Enron accounting scandal was the most infamous one. There were similar allegations against the WorldCom Company, whose CEO Bernard Ebbers hid an expenditure of $11 bn; later this led the company to bankruptcy. Frauds have occurred in almost every country in the world, in almost every sector, including banking, insurance, telecom, automobile industry, health, and the list is endless. The growing focus on cross-border expansion, high levels of growth with internal processes not keeping pace and large number of new employees joining the organization are making most companies vulnerable to greater fraud risk in recent times. The IT hackers and fraudsters can pose a significant threat of a financial crime. Cyber-crimes, economic crimes, ethical crimes, falsification of accounts by showing inflated profits, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of confidential information, non- disclosure of material facts etc. are causing enormous harm to the rights and interests or the society. Every such corporate fraud is a heinous crime against humanity, as it adversely affects and ruins the fortunes of large segments of innocent people. There are several adverse consequences of financial crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR) ISSN: 2393-8870 Review Article a Study on Marketing of Services by Axis Bank
    International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research 2(2): (2015): 47–52 International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR) ISSN: 2393-8870 www.ijarm.com Review Article A Study on marketing of services by Axis bank Dr. M. Thirumagal Vijaya Head , PSG College of Arts and Science , Coimbatore-641014. Corresponding Author : [email protected] Abstract A bank is a financial intermediary that accepts deposits and channels those deposits into lending Keywords activities, either directly by loaning or indirectly through capital markets. Due to their importance in the financial system and influence on national economies, banks are highly regulated in most financial intermediary, countries. Most nations have institutionalized system under which banks hold liquid assets equal to institutionalized system , only a portion of their current liabilities. The Banking sector in India has always been one of the most Banking sector index, preferred destinations for employment. In this decade, this sector has emerged as a sunrise sector in NBFCs, the Indian economy. Banking sector index has grown at a compounded annual rate of over 51 per cent Management Information since the year 2001.The Banking Industry is recruiting in a big way. In the next five years , banks will Systems have to recruit almost 7.5 lakh people. Now, banks have diversified their activities and getting into new products and services that include opportunities in credit cards, consumer finance, wealth management, life and general insurance, investment banking, mutual funds, pension fund regulation, stock broking services, custodian services and private equity etc. Further, most of the leading Indian banks are going global, setting up offices in foreign countries themselves or through their subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution of Corporate Disputes, Non-Compliances & Remedies
    STUDY MATERIAL PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME RESOLUTION OF CORPORATE DISPUTES, NON-COMPLIANCES & REMEDIES MODULE 2 PAPER 6 i © THE INSTITUTE OF COMPANY SECRETARIES OF INDIA Disclaimer : Although due care and diligence have been taken in preparation of this Study Material, the Institute shall not be responsible for any loss or damage, resulting from any action taken on the basis of the contents of this Study Material. Anyone wishing to act on the basis of the material contained herein should do so after cross checking with the original source. TIMING OF HEADQUARTERS Monday to Friday Office Timings – 9.00 A.M. to 5.30 P.M. Public Dealing Timings Without financial transactions – 9.30 A.M. to 5.00 P.M. With financial transactions – 9.30 A.M. to 4.00 P.M. Phones 011-45341000 Fax 011-24626727 Website www.icsi.edu E-mail [email protected] Laser Typesetting by AArushi Graphics, Prashant Vihar, New Delhi, and Printed at SAP Printers, Mumbai/February 2020 ii PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMME RESOLUTION OF CORPORATE DISPUTES, NON-COMPLIANCES & REMEDIES The term Corporate disputes includes the disputes relating to Antitrust, Mala-Fidei, Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Business Torts, Class Actions, Debtor/Creditor, Employment and Labour, Fraud and Misrepresentation, Insurance Coverage, Intellectual Property and Patent Infringement, Board Member Disputes, Partnership Disputes, Privacy, Cyber security and Data Breach, Product Liability, Real Estate, Land Use and Environmental Litigation, Restrictive agreement, Securities Litigation, Shareholder Disputes and Derivative Actions, Tax Disputes, Trade Secret and Unfair Competition. These commercial litigations are different from other civil litigations by virtue of the involvement of businesses rather than just individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Chapter-2 Selection of Sample Banks and Reasons
    CHAPTER-2 SELECTION OF SAMPLE BANKS AND REASONS BEHIND MERGER As stated earlier, the selected period of research is 15 years, which was started in 2000-01 and ending on 2014-15. As mentioned (in Table 2.1), 15 M&As (mergers and acquisitions) had taken place in our selected period either in the form of voluntary/natural market driven merger or compulsory/forced merger. Out of 15 M&As, 9 M&As were on voluntary/natural market driven basis and 6 M&As were on compulsory/forced merger basis. The role of RBI (Reserve Bank of India) is very important for compulsory/forced merger because under Section 45 of the Banking Regulations Acts allow RBI to approve compulsory/forced merger to protect the interest of public, depositors, employees & management and the banking industry as a whole. In this regard, the commencement date of M&As will be the date indicated in the notifications issued by RBI in consultation with the Government. In case of voluntary/natural market driven M&A, RBI does have mandatory power to approve merger of banks. The following table-2.1 presents a snapshot of the 15 M&As, which were taken place during our study period. 15 Table 2.1 Merger and Acquisition (M&A) during the period: FY 2000-01 to 2014-2015 DATE OF S.NO. TARGET BANK ACQUIRER BANK MERGER 1 Bank of Madura Ltd. ICICI Bank Ltd. 10-Mar-01 2 ICICI Ltd ICICI Bank Ltd 3-May-02 3 Benares State Bank Ltd Bank of Baroda 20-Jun-02 4 Nedungadi Bank Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Fraudulent Financial Practices and Investor Protection in the Indian
    FINAL REPORT OF UGC SPONSORED MAJOR RESEARCH PROJECT ON FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL PRACTICES AND INVESTOR PROTECTION IN THE INDIAN CAPITAL MARKET – ROLE OF SEBI F. No. 5-46/2014 (HRP) Dated 10th October, 2015 MRP-MAJOR-COMM-2013-8437 (GENERAL) Submitted to the UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION New Delhi By Dr. GADDAM NARESH REDDY PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF COMMERCE & BUSINESS MANAGEMENT OSMANIA UNIVERSITY HYDERABAD 2018 PREFACE The Indian securities markets have come a long way in the last three decades in terms of both quantitative as well as qualitative transformations. They have also witnessed quite a few ups and downs including a global financial crisis. The relationship between the rate of economic growth and growth in the securities market is two-fold and symbiotic. Strong economic growth helps securities market to develop and developed securities market mobilizes capital to fuel economic growth. In this ever changing global financial landscape, financial markets too are evolving, growing and getting more complex. To effectively regulate these markets, the regulators and policymakers need to be proactive, keep themselves updated and upgraded. Over a period of time, SEBI has strengthened both its regulatory purview and internal capacity to ensure that the interests of the investors are well protected. Efforts are under way to deepen the corporate bonds market, widen the penetration of mutual funds across the country and strengthening the commodities market. The efforts of the government and of policymakers, the Indian financial market will ascend to newer heights. Corporate sectors, stock markets, and the profession of accounting are increasingly gaining importance which calls for a more efficient and transparent working of corporate sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Research Project of Financial Scams in India
    REPORT ON RESEARCH PROJECT OF FINANCIAL SCAMS IN INDIA Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement of the Masters in Business Administration Programme Offered by Jain University during the year 2013-14 BY MOHAMMED MAAZ 3rd Semester MBA UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF PROF.SHRUTI AGARWAL # 319, 17th Cross, 25th Main, JP Nagar 6th Phase Bangalore – 560 078 Phone : 080-43430400, Fax : 080-26532730 E-mail : [email protected], Website : www.bschool.cms.ac.in Declaration I, hereby declare that this Lab Hours / Project (Research Project) on FINANCIAL SCAMS IN INDIA is prepared by me during the academic year 2014-15 under the guidance of prof. Shruti Agarwal. I also declare that this project which is the partial fulfillment of the requirement for MBA programme Offered by Jain University, it is the result of my own efforts with the help of experts. Name : MOHAMMED MAAZ Sem : 3rd Sec : “C” Reg.No : 13MBA63049 Date : Place : Signature ACKNOWLEDGEMENT It gives me immense pleasure in presenting the project report on Financial Scams in India Firstly, I take the opportunity in thanking almightily and my parents without whose continuous blessings, I would not have been able to complete this project. I would like to thank my project guide Prof. Shruti Agarwal for her great help, valuable opinions, advice and suggestions in fulfillment of this project. I am also grateful to Prof. Durga Praveena for encouraging me to select the project topic. I am thankful to our college for all the possible assistance and support, by making available the required books and the internet room which have proved useful to me in successfully completing my project.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited (“Idfc”, the “Company” Or the “Issuer”) and an Offer for Sale of 283,600,000 Equity Shares of Rs
    C Y K RED HERRING PROSPECTUS Please read Section 60B of the Companies Act, 1956 Dated June 25, 2005 100% Book Built Issue (Incorporated on January 13, 1997 under the Companies Act, 1956 as a public limited company) Registered Office : ITC Centre, 3rd floor, 760, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002, India. Tel: 91 44 2855 9448; Fax 91 44 2854 7597 Corporate Office: Ramon House, H.T. Parekh Marg, 169, Backbay Reclamation, Mumbai - 400 020, India Tel: 91 22 5633 9100; Fax 91 22 2202 9711 E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.idfc.com Contact Person : Mr. Mahendra N. Shah; Tel: 91 22 5633 9118 PUBLIC ISSUE OF 403,600,000 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH FOR CASH AT A PRICE OF RS. [] PER EQUITY SHARE AGGREGATING RS. [] MILLION, COMPRISING A FRESH ISSUE OF 120,000,000 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH BY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED (“IDFC”, THE “COMPANY” OR THE “ISSUER”) AND AN OFFER FOR SALE OF 283,600,000 EQUITY SHARES OF RS. 10 EACH BY THE SELLING SHAREHOLDERS. THE FRESH ISSUE AND THE OFFER FOR SALE ARE JOINTLY REFERRED TO HEREIN AS THE ISSUE. THE ISSUE WILL CONSTITUTE 35.96% OF THE FULLY DILUTED POST-ISSUE CAPITAL OF OUR COMPANY. PRICE BAND: Rs. 29 TO Rs. 34 PER EQUITY SHARE OF FACE VALUE Rs. 10 ISSUE PRICE IS 2.9 TIMES THE FACE VALUE AT THE LOWER END OF THE PRICE BAND AND 3.4 TIMES THE FACE VALUE AT THE HIGHER END OF THE PRICE BAND In case of revision in the Price Band, the Bidding/Issue Period will be extended for three additional days after revision of the Price Band subject to the Bidding/ Issue Period not exceeding 10 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Adjudicating Officer
    BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. - SRP/RK/AO: 254/2012] UNDER SECTION 15 I OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992 READ WITH RULE 5 OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER) RULES, 1995 In respect of J H P Securities Private Limited Member Broker of BSE SEBI Registration No. – INB 010990036 (PAN – AAACJ2847H) In the matter of Gemstone Investments Limited BACKGROUND IN BRIEF 1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) conducted investigations into the affairs, trading and dealings in the shares of Gemstone Investments Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Company/GIL’) for the period from August 28, 2006 to August 21, 2008 on the basis of a report received from the Bombay Stock Exchange Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘BSE’) regarding substantial reduction in the shareholding of the promoters of the Company and unusual spurt in price and traded volume of the scrip. 2. On investigation, it was, inter alia, observed by SEBI that the stock broker JHP Securities Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Noticee’) had the highest purchase and sale concentration in the scrip of GIL during the period of investigation. The major clients of the Noticee were (i) Prem Parekh, (ii) Mala Hemanth Seth, (iii) Kishore Chauhan, (iv) Hemanth Seth, (v) Bhavesh P Pabari and (vi) Ankit Sanchaniya. The investigations, prima facie, revealed that these clients of the Noticee were related/ connected with each other and were part of a larger group of entities which were connected/related with each other and with the director of GIL.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Liberalization and the Macroeconomics of Poverty
    Financial Liberalization in India: An Assessment of its Nature and Outcomes C.P. Chandrasekhar and Parthapratim Pal Financial sector reform, involving substantial liberalisation of regulatory control over markets, institutions and instruments, is at the centre of the engineered transition that developing countries have been through over the last three decades. It is now widely acknowledged that the process of financial reform has had economy-wide implications, not just for the relations between financial institutions and their clients and for the nature of operations of financial institutions, but for the manoeuvrability of the state when it comes to macroeconomic policy. There are three broad objectives that the process of financial liberalization serves: (i) it opens the country to new forms and larger volumes of international financial flows, in order to attract a part of the substantially increased flows of financial capital to the so- called “emerging markets” since the late-1970s; (ii) to facilitate these inflows it liberalizes to differing degree the terms governing outflows of foreign exchange in the form of current account investment income payments and in the form of capital account transfers for permitted transactions; and (iii) it transforms the structure of the financial sector and the nature and operations of financial firms in a manner that makes the financial system resemble that in countries like the US and the UK. It has been argued for sometime now that the first two of these, involving liberalization of controls on inflows and outflows of capital respectively, have resulted in an increase in financial fragility in developing countries, making them prone to periodic financial and currency crises.1 Analyses of individual instances of crises have tended to conclude that the nature and timing of these crises had much to do with the shift to a more liberal and open financial regime.
    [Show full text]
  • FII) Investment in Indian Equity Market
    A Study of Foreign Institutional Investors' (FII) Investment in Indian Equity market A Thesis submitted to Gujarat Technological University for the Award of Doctor of Philosophy in Management by Joshi Mrunal Chetanbhai [Enrollment No. 139997292006] under supervision of Dr. Jayesh N. Desai GUJARAT TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AHMEDABAD December – 2019 © Joshi Mrunal Chetanbhai DECLARATION I declare that the thesis entitled “A Study of Foreign Institutional Investors' (FII) Investment in Indian Equity market” submitted by me for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy is the record of research work carried out by me during the period from June 2014 to March 2019 under the supervision of Dr. Jayesh N. Desai and this has not formed the basis for the award of any degree, diploma, associateship, fellowship, titles in this or any other University or other institution of higher learning. I further declare that the material obtained from other sources has been duly acknowledged in the thesis. I shall be solely responsible for any plagiarism or other irregularities, if noticed in the thesis. Signature of the Research Scholar : ………………………… Date:….……………… Name of Research Scholar: Joshi Mrunal Chetanbhai Place : ………………………………… (i) CERTIFICATE I certify that the work incorporated in the thesis “A Study of Foreign Institutional Investors' (FII) Investment in Indian Equity market” submitted by Shri Joshi Mrunal Chetanbhai was carried out by the candidate under my supervision/guidance. To the best of my knowledge: (i) the candidate has not submitted the same research work to any other institution for any degree/diploma, Associateship, Fellowship or other similar titles (ii) the thesis submitted is a record of original research work done by the Research Scholar during the period of study under my supervision, and (iii) the thesis represents independent research work on the part of the Research Scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 INFAMOUS CORPORATE FRAUDS in INDIA and ABROAD
    Chapter 3 INFAMOUS CORPORATE FRAUDS IN INDIA AND ABROAD SYNOPSIS 1. Infamous Corporate Frauds in India 63 1.1 The Harshad Mehta Case (1992) 64 1.2 The C R Bhansali Case (1992-96) 66 1.3 The Virendra Rastogi Case (1995-96) 67 1.4 The Cobbler Case (1995) 68 1.5 The JVG Case (1997) 69 1.6 The Anubhav Plantation Case (1998) 72 1.7 The Abdul Karim Telgi Case (2000) 73 1.8 The UTI Case (2000) 75 1.9 The Dinesh Dalmia Case (2001) 76 1.10 The Ketan Parekh Case (2001) 77 1.11 The Sanjay Agarwal Home Trade Case (2001) 79 1.12 The IPO Demat Case (2005) 80 1.13 The Satyam Case (2009) 81 1.14 The Saradha Group-Chit Fund Case (2013) 84 1.15 The National Spot Exchange Limited (NSEL) Case (2013) 87 1.16 The Bank of Baroda Case (2015) 92 1.17 The PACL Case (2015) 93 2. Infamous Corporate Frauds Abroad 94 2.1 The Enron Case (1985) 94 2.2 The World Com Case (2002) 96 2.3 The Tyco Case (2005) 96 2.4 The Ponzi Scheme (Fort Lauderdale) Case (2009) 96 2.5 The Mark Todd Case (2002-2005) 97 2.6 The President of California Agribusiness Case (1999-2002) 98 2.7 The Maximum Dynamics Case (2000-2005) 98 2.8 The Corporate Funding Financial of America Case (2001) 99 2.9 The Edward Ehee Case (2001-2006) 100 2.10 The Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. Case (2009) 100 2.11 The Marian Gardens Tree Farm Case (2007) 101 2.12 The Quality Trucking Case (2000-2002) 101 2.13 The Philadelphia Academy Charter School Case (2009) 101 2.14 The Rajat Gupta Case (2012) 102 3.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Major Corporate Scams in India with Special Reference to Securities Market
    An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade Publishers 622 AN ANALYSIS OF MAJOR CORPORATE SCAMS IN INDIA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SECURITIES MARKET Written by Mayank Shrivastava Research Scholar, Amity University Raipur Chhattisgarh, India ABSTRACT Frauds have been rampant in the business world, and India has had its share of corporate frauds. The incidents of corporate frauds have significantly impacted the stakeholder’s confidence. The scope of a fraud is no limited to monetary figure. It, in most of the instances has made the organization part with its reputation, goodwill and what not. Many large corporations maintain consistently good record of ethical practices and compliance with the law that contrast sharply with the behavior of other corporations. The reasons for these differences present several important issues. Corporate frauds and abuse of position have been seen in various cases relating to scams, malpractices, insider trading price rigging etc. like Harshad Mehta Scam, Ketan Parekh Scam, Satyam Scam, Sardha Chit Fund Scam, Sahara Scam, PACL, IPO Scam etc. The wrongdoers in case of corporate scams are not like those other criminals, rather they are in most of the cases such sharp minded people that they know how to find the lacunae even better than even the makers of the Law. Finding the loopholes in the existing procedure is where a corporate scam starts. The brilliant a mind, severe the corporate crime, these perpetrators of corporate scams are more brilliant, soft spoken, smart and intelligent. They are well versed with the law, in the sense that they have not only read and understood the parent legislation and regulations but they have also interpreted in the manner that they know how to make use of the law for their own sake.
    [Show full text]