Death at Elmira: George W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Death at Elmira: George W East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2005 Death at Elmira: George W. Jernigan, William Hoffman, and the Union Prison System. Thomas Watson Jernigan East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Jernigan, Thomas Watson, "Death at Elmira: George W. Jernigan, William Hoffman, and the Union Prison System." (2005). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1017. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1017 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Death At Elmira: George W. Jernigan, William Hoffman, and The Union Prison System A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master in Arts in History by T. Watson Jernigan May, 2005 Dr. Andrew Slap, Chair Dr. Stephen Fritz Dr. Elwood Watson Keywords: Elmira Prison Camp, William Hoffman, Union Prison System ABSTRACT Death At Elmira: George W. Jernigan, William Hoffman, and The Union Prison System by T. Watson Jernigan This thesis examines the interaction between the Union Prison System led by William Hoffman and the Confederate prisoners-of-war, specifically those held at Elmira, New York. By focusing on Hoffman’s actions and decisions in the last year of the war, the Confederate death toll can be better understood. The treatise relies heavily on The War Of The Rebellion: A Compilation Of The Official Records Of The Union And Confederate Armies. Two studies were indispensable for this study: Hesseltine’s Civil War Prisons: A Study in War Psychology, and Leslie Hunter’s Ph.D. Dissertation, Warden for the Union: William Hoffman (1807-1884). The conclusions of my research are: (A) William Hoffman developed a change in actions in 1864, and (B) these actions continued in the last year of the war. As a result of his actions and other factors, Elmira had the highest percentage of death of any Union prison camp. Hoffman’s actions led to a higher death rate of Confederate prisoners than has been previously recognized. 2 Copyright 2005 by T. Watson Jernigan All Rights Reserved 3 DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to: GEORGE W. JERNIGAN (ca 1842-1865) WATSON JERNIGAN (1848-1905) RUPERT WATSON JERNIGAN (1889-1967) It is done to honor my father: RUPERT WATSON JERNIGAN, JR. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the members of my committee for their guidance of an adult learner through the process of this thesis. To Drs. Dale Schmitt and Stephen Fritz whose gentle persuasion and care allowed me to fulfill my dream, I thank you. To Dr. Elwood Watson whose intellectual challenges made me rethink the history of my own life, I thank you. To Dr. Doug Burgess whose listening ear gave comfort to an adult learner, I thank you. To Dr. Andrew Slap whose patience and understanding were most helpful in completing this project, I truly thank you. I would most especially like to thank Dr. Wayne Andrews for his unwavering support. His upbeat attitude on the progress of my degree was gratefully appreciated. I would like to thank my mother, Henrietta Marsh Hopkins Jernigan, for giving me my love of history and an incurable thirst for knowledge. I would like to thank my father, Rupert Watson Jernigan, Jr., for an appreciation of genealogy and family history. I would like to thank my children, April, Rachel, and Grace, for their support when I began this project and their continued love and support through its writing. Your comments were appreciated and needed. For my grandchildren, this is “to let you know who you are and where you came from.” Lastly, to the Love of My Life, Linda, I can never thank-you enough for your support and love throughout this process. Through the periods of frustration and the long nights of research and writing, you were my ground. I am blessed to have a partner such as you—now and forever. 5 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 2 COPYRIGHT ....................................................................................................................... 3 DEDICATION ……………………………………………………………………………. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ………………………………………………………………… 5 Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………. 7 2. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR TO THE EXCHANGE CARTEL OF 1862......................................................... 12 3. TREATMENT OF CONFEDERATE POWs DURING THE EXCHANGE CARTEL UNTIL THE SPRING OF 1864…………………………………….. 41 4. GEORGE W. JERNIGAN: HIS HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND INVOLVEMENT IN THE CIVIL WAR FROM ENLISTMENT TO CAPTURE AND ENTRANCE TO ELMIRA PRISON CAMP……………... 89 5. HOFFMAN’S DECISIONS AT ELMIRA MILITARY PRISON AND THEIR EFFECT ON THE HEALTH OF CONFEDERATE POWs…………………. 127 6. CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………………. 162 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………. 174 VITA….................................................................................................................................. 186 6 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andersonville. Even today, the name resounds as a prime example of man’s inhumanity to man. The records showed that over 13,000 Union prisoners-of-war (POWs) died in the small stockade in Georgia. The camp had a reputation for some of the worst conditions ever endured by any POW. Inadequate shelter (make-shift tents), poor water supply (a single stream supplying over 30,000 men), and horrific rations were among the conditions that caused the death of so many men. The images of the returning Union survivors were among the most striking photographs ever taken and compare to those of Holocaust victims of World War II. As a result of Andersonville, the people of the North demanded retaliation and accountability. The commandant of Andersonville, Henry Wirz, became the object of their scorn. There was no doubt that the conditions at Andersonville were horrific and the death toll was high. It was not, however, the only Civil War prison camp to have that reputation. The Union prison camp at Elmira, New York had the reputation of “Hellmira.” During its twelve-month existence, one in every four of the prisoners who entered the camp was buried in Woodlawn Cemetery. That was a death rate comparable to Andersonville. Many of the survivors of Elmira wrote of inadequate shelter (housed in tents until December in New York State), the poisonous drinking water, and the poor rations. Yet, no Union commander had the accountability of Wirz. It is the thesis of this treatise that William Hoffman, Commissary-General of the Union Prison System, was in part responsible for the reputation of Elmira. 7 Following the Civil War, POWs, both Union and Confederate, wrote books about their experiences in prison camps. As most survivors passed away, the literature on the prison camps declined. In 1912, Clay W. Holmes wrote The Elmira Prison Camp: A History of the Military Prison at Elmira, N.Y. July 6, 1864, to July 10, 1865.1 It was not until 1930 that another author tackled the subject of Civil War prisons and prisoners. William Best Hesseltine’s Civil War Prisons: A Study In War Psychology2was the classic study on the subject and stood alone until the end of the century. In the 1990s, there was a resurgence of interest in this subject. Lonnie R. Speer’s Portals To Hell: Military Prisons of the Civil War3 was the first of an increasing number of books on Civil War prisoners and their prison experience. The difference was that Northern prison camps have come under as much scrutiny as Andersonville. George Levy’s To Die in Chicago: Confederate Prisoners at Camp Douglas 1862-18654 discussed the prison facilities in Chicago, Illinois. By the turn of the century, Elmira and its reputation was the subject of several books. Michael Horigan’s Elmira: Death Camp of the North5, Michael P. Gray’s The Business of Captivity: Elmira And Its Civil War Prison6, and Philip Burnham’s So Far From Dixie: Confederates in Yankee Prisons7 were new additions to literature scrutinizing the Union prison system, specifically Elmira. The increased interest in this subject served as the basis for James McPherson’s comments. Writing in a new afterword to his classic, Battle Cry Of 1 Clay W. Holmes, The Elmira Prison Camp: A History of the Military Prison at Elmira, N.Y. July 6, 1864, to July 10, 1865 (New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1912). 2 William B. Hesseltine, Civil War Prisons: A Study In War Psychology (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1930). Hereafter Civil War Prisons. 3 Lonnie R. Speer, Portals To Hell: Military Prisons of the Civil War (Mechanicsburg: Stackpole Books, 1997. 4 George Levy, To Die in Chicago: Confederate Prisoners at Camp Douglas 1862-1865 (Gretna, Louisiana: Pelican Publishing Company, 1999). 5 Michael Horigan, Elmira: Death Camp of the North (Mechanicsburg: Stackpole Books, 2002). 6 Michael P. Gray, The Business of Captivity: Elmira And Its Civil War Prison (Kent: The Kent State University Press, 2001). Hereafter listed as: The Business of Captivity. 7 Philip Burnham, So Far From Dixie: Confederates in Yankee Prisons (Lanham, Maryland: Taylor Trade
Recommended publications
  • Veterans in State and Federal Prison, 2004
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report May 2007, NCJ 217199 Veterans in State and Federal Prison, 2004 By Margaret E. Noonan Percent of prisoners reporting prior military service BJS Statistician continues to decline and Christopher J. Mumola BJS Policy Analyst Percent of prisoners 25% The percentage of veterans among State and Federal Federal prisoners has steadily declined over the past three decades, 20% according to national surveys of prison inmates conducted State by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). In 2004,10% of 15% State prisoners reported prior service in the U.S. Armed Forces, down from 12% in 1997 and 20% in 1986. Since 10% BJS began surveying Federal prisoners in 1991, they have 5% shown the same decline over a shorter period. Overall, an estimated 140,000 veterans were held in the Nation’s 0% prisons in 2004, down from 153,100 in 2000. 1986 1991 1997 2004 The majority of veterans in State (54%) and Federal (64%) prison served during a wartime period, but a much lower percentage reported seeing combat duty (20% of State Veterans had shorter criminal records than nonveterans in prisoners, 26% of Federal). Vietnam War-era veterans were State prison, but reported longer prison sentences and the most common wartime veterans in both State (36%) and expected to serve more time in prison than nonveterans. Federal (39%) prison. Veterans of the Iraq-Afghanistan eras Nearly a third of veterans and a quarter of nonveterans comprised 4% of veterans in both State and Federal prison.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • On MONDAY, September 24, the Roundtable Welcomes MRRT Member Rufus K
    VOL. LII, NO. 9 Michigan Regimental Round Table Newsletter—Page 1 September 2012 Last call to sign-up for the October 27-28 field trip to the battlefields of First and Second Bull Run. Should you have the time and inclination to join the thirty one members slated to go, contact one of the trip coordinators. You can find their contact information and all other particulars on our website at: www.farmlib.org/mrrt/annual_fieldtrip.html. On MONDAY, September 24, the Roundtable welcomes MRRT member Rufus K. Barton, III. Rufus will discuss the “Missouri Surprise of 1864, the battle of Fort Davidson”. The crucial struggle for control of Missouri has been neglected by most Civil War historians over the years. Rufus will explain that while President Lincoln said he had to have Kentucky, the Union occupation of Missouri saved his “bacon”. The Battle of Fort Davidson on September 27, 1864 was the opening engagement of Confederate Major General Sterling Price’s raid to “liberate” his home state. The battle’s outcome played a key role in the final Union victory in Missouri. Rufus grew up in the St. Louis, Missouri area and his business opportunities brought him to Michigan in 1975. Rufus was also an U.S. Army Lieutenant and a pilot for 30 years. Studying the Civil War is one of his hobbies. The MRRT would like to thank William Cottrell for his exceptional presentation, “Lincoln’s Position on Slavery—A Work In Progress”. Bill presented the MRRT a thoughtful and well researched presentation on the progression of Abraham Lincoln’s thinking on the slavery question and how it culminated in action during his Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring the Southern Cause 150 Years
    3B Company B May This event calendar is for the Georgia Cavalry to capture times for rides, meetings, or any event you would like to share with others. This list is just for your information on events around the South. We will update and send out every two weeks. So if you have an event you want to let others know about, send it in for us to post. Send events to [email protected]. After an event date has passed on the calendar event will be deleted. Honoring the Southern Cause 150 Years Happy Memorial Day By proclamation of General John A. Logan of the Grand Army of the Republic, the first major Memorial Day observance is held to honor those who died “in defense of their country during the late rebellion.” Known to some as “Decoration Day,” mourners honored the Civil War dead by decorating their graves with flowers. On the first Decoration Day, General James Garfield made a speech at Arlington National Cemetery, after which 5,000 participants helped to decorate the graves of the more than 20,000 Union and Confederate soldiers buried in the cemetery. The 1868 celebration was inspired by local observances that had taken place in various locations in the three years since the end of the Civil War. In fact, several cities claim to be the birthplace of Memorial Day, including Columbus, Mississippi; Macon, Georgia; Richmond, Virginia; Boalsburg, Pennsylvania; and Carbondale, Illinois. In 1966, the federal government, under the direction of President Lyndon B. Johnson, declared Waterloo, New York, the official birthplace of Memorial Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Union and Confederate Newspaper Coverage of Civil War Prisons
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2001 The Press and the Prisons: Union and Confederate Newspaper Coverage of Civil War Prisons Elizabeth C. Bangert College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Criminology Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Bangert, Elizabeth C., "The Press and the Prisons: Union and Confederate Newspaper Coverage of Civil War Prisons" (2001). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626316. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-9maw-v382 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PRESS AND THE PRISONS: UNION AND CONFEDERATE NEWSPAPER COVERAGE OF CIVIL WAR PRISONS 1861-1865 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth C. Bangert 2001 ProQuest Number: 10630096 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest, ProQuest 10630096 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • January 1865: 'Galvanized Rebels' Sit out War
    January 1865: 'Galvanized Rebels' sit out war By Dr. Terry L. Jones Special to The Journal Zebulon York (Library of Congress) During the Civil War, hundreds of Confederate prisoners took oaths of allegiance to the Union and agreed to serve in the Yankee army as a way out of captivity. Known as "Galvanized Yankees," some were sent west to man frontier forts and fight Indians. A lesser known story is the Southern attempt to recruit "Galvanized Rebels." In the winter of 1864-65, the Louisiana brigade serving in the trenches of Petersburg, Virginia, was down to just a few hundred men. In a desperate attempt to strengthen the unit, officials turned to an unlikely source of manpower Yankee prisoners of war. The plan was the brainchild of Father Egidius "Giles" Smulders, a Dutch native who served as the 8th Louisiana's chaplain. In an October 1864 letter to President Jefferson Davis, he wrote: "I understand that there are now in our hands a large number of Irish Catholic prisoners of war, who I think may be induced to enlist in the Confederate Army. .I respectfully request that [these prisoners] be collected in one locality, that facilities may be offered me and some other Catholic Priests for conducting religious exercises amongst them and for holding other incourse [sic] with the view of bringing them over to the Confederate cause. Louisiana was the only Confederate state with a predominantly Catholic population, and officials believed it would be easier to convince the Union prisoners to serve in the Louisiana Tiger regiments than other Protestant-dominated units.
    [Show full text]
  • WN90N COUNT/, ALAZAMA MIL IZAOCBK Nbmlhiek
    ,1 WN90N COUNT/, ALAZAMA MIL IZAOCBK NBMlHieK lists: »s Sillssslssi siissSS si MARCH 2003 PRISON CAMPS Blue vs. Gray by Peggy Shaw The Civil War gave a new meaning to the term "Prisoner of War". Never before had there such a large number of soldiers held in an area; filled to such extreme over capacity. In 1861, the Confederate Army fired on Fort Sumter. Under the command of Gen. Pierce Beauregard, prisoners were paroled on their honor not to return to battle. He allowed the Union Soldiers to vacate Fort Sumter and take all the arms and personal belongings they could carry. He allowed paroled soldiers to give 100 gun salute to the American Flag before their departure. Gen. Beauregard had been a student of Maj. Anderson, commander at Fort Sumter, at West Point, and serving as Anderson's assistant after graduation. In July of 1862, Representatives Maj. Gen. D.H. Hill (Confederate) and Gen. Maj. John H. Dix (Union) held negotiations for prisoner exchanges. They agreed that first year officers would be allowed to return to their units. Officers were to be traded rank for rank and enlisted men exchanges were similar. Both incurred that all prisoners were to treated humanly, and the injured cared for just as those of the regular army. The war continued and the exchange system started to break down. Both sides began arguing with one another over alleged violations of parole agreements. Ulysses S. Grant stated, "Exchanging prisoners only prolongs the war. The war would be won only when the confederates could not replace their men as they lost them due to death, injury or capture".
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reports of Trial of War Criminals, Volume V, English Edition
    REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION, VOLUME V LONDON PUBLISHED FOR THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1948 Price 5S. od. net. ------~-----~-----~----~--_._-----_.- Oficial PublicatiolJs on THE TRIAL OF GERMAN 11AJOR WAR CRIMINALS AT NUREMBERG H JUDGMENT Judgment of the International Military Tribunal for the Trial of German Major War Criminals: September 30 and October 1, 1946 (Cmd. 6964) 25. 6d. (2s. 3d.) Errata Gratis SPEECHES Opening speeches of the Chief Prosecutors 2s. 6d. (2s. 9d.) Speeches of the Chief Prosecutors at the Close of the Case against the Individual Defendants 35. (3s. 4d.) Speeches of the Prosecutors at the Close of the Case against the Indicted Organisations 25. 6d. (2s. 9d.) PRICES IN BRACKETS INCLUDE POSTAGE II CONTINUED ON PAGE iii OF COVER i: i: __________..-n ----.:; ~__.._ IL LAW REPORTS OF TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS Selected and prepared by the UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION Volume V LONDON: PUBLISHED FOR . THE UNITED NATIONS WAR CRIMES COMMISSION BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE 1948 CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD BY THE RT. HON. THE LORD WRIGHT OF DURLEY vii THE CASES: 25. TRIAL OF LIEUTENANT - GENERAL SmGERU SAWADA AND THREE OTHERS. United States Military Commission, Shanghai (27th February, 1946-15th April, 1946) 1 A. OUTLINE OF THE PROCEEDINGS 1 1. THE CHARGES 1 2. THE EVIDENCE .. 2 3. THE VERDICT AND SENTENCES 6 B. NOTES ON THE CASE.. 8 1. A PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT 8 2. DENIAL OF A FAIR TRIAL 10 3".
    [Show full text]
  • 71 Stat.] Public Law 85-117-Aug
    312 PUBLIC LAW 85-117-AUG. 2, 1957 [71 ST AT. Public Law 85-117 August 2, 1957 AN ACT [H. R. 7665] Making appropriations for the Department of Defense for tlie fiscal year ending June 30,1958, and for other purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the Dep art m ent of Defense Appropri­ United States of America in Congress assembled^ That the following ation Act, 1958. sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not other­ wise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1958, for mili­ tary functions administered by the Department of Defense, and for other purposes, namely: TITLE I OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE SALARIES AND EXPENSES For expenses necessary for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, including purchase (not to exceed five for replacement only at not to exceed $3,000 each) and hire of passenger motor vehicles; and not to exceed $60,000 for emergency and extraordinary expenses, to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of Defense for such purposes as he deems proper, and his determination thereon shall be final and conclusive; $15,900,000. OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS For salaries and expenses necessary for the Office of Public Affairs, $450,000. TITLE II IXTERSERVICE ACTIVITIES CLAIMS For payment of claims by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Army (except as provided in appropriations for civil functions administered by the Department of the Army), Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force, as authorized by law; claims (not to exceed $1,000 in any one case) for damages
    [Show full text]
  • Confedera Cy
    TheThe SourceSource Teaching with Primary Sources at Eastern Illinois University Reasons behind war are complex and there is rarely only one issue causing conflict. The Civil War is no different, there had been disagreements between the North and South for years. Slavery is considered the main reason for the Civil War and while the major issue, it was not the only one. The North and South had different economies. The North was moving towards the industrial revolution where factories used paid labor.1 The South was based in agriculture where crops, especially cotton, were profitable. Cotton was sold to mills in England and returned to the United States as manufactured goods.1 The North was able to produce many of these same items and northern politicians passed heavy taxes on imported goods trying to force the South to buy northern goods.1 These taxes seemed unfair to southerners. In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska Act was signed, allowing new states in the west to decide if they would be free or slave states. If either side could bring new states with the same beliefs, into the Union they would have more representation in government.1 Citizens of the southern states believed the rights of individual states had priority over federal laws. In 1859, at Cooper Union in New York City, Abraham Lincoln gave a speech outlining his policy at the time on slavery, “We must not disturb slavery in the states where it exists, because the Constitution, and the peace of the country both forbid us.”3 Lincoln opposed slavery and the prospect of the western states becoming slave states.
    [Show full text]
  • Help Save 120 Acres at Fisher's Hill
    HELP SAVE 120 ACRES AT FISHER’S HILL “THERE WAS SATAN TO PAY” ● THE BATTLE OF FISHER’S HILL “There was Satan to pay on the right…a volcano of cannonade and musketry.” – U.S. Capt. John William DeForest, 12th Connecticut Infantry Sketch of battle by James E. Taylor. Courtesy the Western Reserve Historical Society, Cleveland, Ohio “THE ONLY PLACE WHERE A STAND COULD BE MADE” from the VI Corps, in the center of the Union line, advanced to the ridgeline opposite Pegram’s Hill, prompting a furious response from After a series of victories in the summer of 1864 by Confederates southern artillery. Capt. Fitts remembered [how] “The rushing and under Gen. Jubal A. Early had thrown the north into an uproar screaming of the ponderous missiles filled the air.” and imperiled Abraham Lincoln’s reelection, Union Gen. Philip H. Sheridan was sent to the Shenandoah Valley to bring an end to Crook launched his assault about 4 pm, scattering the Confederate Confederate dominance. After Sheridan’s much-larger force cavalry and hitting the end of the southern line “like a thunderbolt.” delivered a crushing defeat to Early’s army at Third Winchester Gen. Stephen Dodson Ramseur’s men initially put up a stubborn on September 19, Early withdrew his army south to the imposing resistance, but broke under pressure from multiple directions. defensive position of Fisher’s Hill, which Early believed “was the Sheridan ordered the rest of the Federals forward. In the center, the only place where a stand could be made.” The Federals pursued, troops of the VI Corps moved across the target property, past Pifer’s and by September 21 the armies faced each other again.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction & Historic Perspective
    CAMP DOUGLAS September 1861-December 1865 (A Chicago story that must be told) View of Camp Douglas, September 1864, looking Southwest. (Image courtesy of Chicago Historical Society) 12-13 “Some institutions exist, and pass away to be forgotten; others never die, but live eternally in the memory. They possess associations clinging around them, and entwined in every fiber of their existence, so closely allied to the interest of the community that time only serves to mellow the interest, and clothe them in everlasting importance. Of these, not the least in the minds of the citizens of Chicago is Camp Douglas.” I. N. Haynie, Adjutant General of the State of Illinois, 1865. Camp Douglas (1861-1865) –A Chicago Story that must be told The Chicago Story that Must be Told: Reconstruction of a portion of Camp Douglas, one of the most significant Union Civil War prison camps, is important to the history of Chicago. Camp Douglas was more than a prison camp. As the largest reception and training center for Union soldiers in Northern Illinois, Camp Douglas was the most significant Civil War facility in Chicago. In addition to training over 30,000 Union soldiers, Camp Douglas was one of the few Union camps that received and trained African American soldiers. Providing a place for young and old to see and touch our heritage is important to retaining a historic perspective. Giving an educational opportunity to our youth is critical to providing them with a sound historic foundation. Sharing with all the role of African Americans during the Civil War, as part of the Camp Douglas restoration, offers a unique opportunity to tell the story of over four-million slaves who emerged from the war to join Northern freemen in the quest for racial equality.
    [Show full text]