THE USE of LETTERS in the TATLER, SPECTATOR. and GUARDIAN by PEMBER WILLIAM ROCAP, B.A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE USE OF LETTERS IN THE TATLER, SPECTATOR. AND GUARDIAN by PEMBER WILLIAM ROCAP, B.A. A THESIS IN ENGLISH Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Technological College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved Dlrector Accepted ^-^ <<) • Dean of the Graduatjfir SCAOOI August, 19< ios ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply indebted to Professor Truman W. Camp for his direction of this Thesis and his en- couragement of my graduate studies. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ^^ I. INTRODUCTION AND PRECEDENTS 1 II. THE TATLER 9 III. THE SPECTATOR 42 IV. THE GUARDUN 65 V. CONCLUSION 79 BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 ill CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION AND PRECEDENTS The Tatler, Spectator, and Guardian are considered the best of the many endeavors of Addison and Steele in the genre of the periodical essay. All three surpassed any similar works which had appeared before them; and certainly the first two, if not the Guardian also, were never to be equalled. If any single feature appears in issue after issue, volume after volume, it is the letters of which the authors made ample use throughout each of the three periodicals. Over 850 letters or parts of letters were printed in the 272 issues of the Tat ler. 555 of the Spectator, and 175 of the Guardian. Some of these letters were authentic, having been submitted by readers most of whose identities must remain hidden behind initials and assumed pen names; many of the letters were fictitious, having been written by Addison or Steele for their own pur poses. Others were also written to or by Addison and Steele, but in their capacity as Addison and Steele and not as Mr. Spectator or Isaac Bickerstaff. There were a few letters of classical and other writers of former times which were used for illustrative purposes. In spite of this regular use of letters, the fact is usu ally mentioned only in passing by editors and scholars when discussing these periodicals. Typical of this practice is Professor C. Gregory Smith's comment in his notes to the 1 Everyman edition of the Spectator. He simply says that "the letters of correspondents became a feature of the Spectator."^ He then gives the number of the particular issues which stat ed Addison's position and mentions that "Steele was, as John son tells us, much beholden to outside copyI" Johnson him self barely touches on the subject in his Life of Addison: The Spectator had many contributors; and Steele, whose negligence kept him always in a hurry, when it was his turn to furnish a paper, called loudly for letters, of which Addison, whose materials were more, made little use.2 Johnson's oversight is worse than Smith's, not only because he unfairly slights the accomplishment of Steele in order to show Addison in a better light, but because his statement im plies that the letters, far from being an important part, were actually rather extraneous to the "real" Spectator. A somewhat more favorable comment, yet one still lacking the proper perspective, is Richmond P. Bond's in the Introduction of Studies in the Early English Periodicals. He says the "Tatler and Spectator laced rather than diluted their essays with correspondence both genuine and minted for the issue."^ ^C. Gregory Smith (ed.). The Spectator (London: J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd., Everyman's Library, 1963), I, 514. ^Samuel Johnson, Lives of the English Poets, ed. G.B. Hill (Oxford, 1905), II, 108. ^Richmond P. Bond, Studies in the Early English Peri odical (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 195777 P- 19. However complimentary Bond may be, he still failed to view the letters as an Integral part of the periodicals rather than something "tacked on," as the use of the word "laced" suggests. In this sense, he is almost as inaccurate as the others in his treatment of the letters; certainly he is just as incomplete, for he says no more about them. But Bond did atone for both his inaccuracy and incom pleteness in another Introduction, this time to his edition of New Letters to the Tatler and Spectator. After dealing extensively with the variety of letters used, while saying very little about the actual uses and functions of the let ters, he concludes with this statement: The letter became not an adjunct or a merely congenial accessory but a component contri buting abundance and variety to the central unity of these two Augustan journals.^ He recognizes the letters as' a "component" rather than an "accessory," but he failed to see that they contributed more than "variety and abundance" to the periodicals. For the most part. Bond discusses the use of letters in the Spectator rath er than In the Spectator and Tatler; the Guardian is not even mentioned. The only other scholar who has gone beyond merely men tioning that letters were used throughout the periodicals is ^Richmond P. Bond, New Letters to the Tatler and Spec tator (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1959), p. 14. Hereafter referred to as Bond. Henry Pettit.5 His discussion, like Bond's, is mostly con- cerned with the Spectator, little with the Tatler. and not at all with the Guardian. Also, his discussion is limited to the use of the letters solely in relation to Steele as an ed itor. I generally agree with his conclusions as far as they go, but because of the one-sided nature of his discussion, his conclusions are incomplete. In addition, he makes a few questionable statements which I will take issue with in later chapters. Thus, although Addison and Steele used letters in their major periodicals to the extent that almost everyone who has since written about those periodicals has recognized their presence (the sheer number of the letters in the periodicals cannot be ignored), very few have gone beyond the single statement; and even the discussions of those few are incom plete, being limited usually to the letters found in the Spectator and to the variety of letters used. In effect, the full significance of the use of letters in the Tatler, Spec tator, and Guardian has never been discussed; all o^ the rea sons for this use have never been given; and the relation of this use of letters, not only to Addison, Steele, and other contributors, but to the format of the periodicals has never been accurately or completely understood. This thesis will 5Henry Pettlt, "Letters to the Editor: Steele's Famil iar Way of Writing," University of Colorado Studies. Series In Language and Literature. No. 9 (August, 1963), pp. 92-99. Hereafter referred to as Pettlt. 5 resolve all of the preceding problems. As Calhoun Wlnton says when referring to the Tatler and Spectator in his biography of Steele, "almost everything in both papers had been anticipated somewhere, in some periodi cal. "6 "Almost everything" Included the use of letters. Not only was there a pre-established interest in publishing let ters when the Tatler first appeared in 1709, the English had been receiving most of their news by letter and by news peri odicals in letter form for over a century; therefore the use of letters to convey news, political or social, did not in the least way seem strange to them. In addition, several prominent periodicals preceding the Tatler had been built en tirely around a questlon-and-answer motif. Because all of these practices did exert some influence upon Addison and Steele's use of letters in their own periodicals, they must be recognized in this thesis, if only cursorily examined. The Interest li^ letters prior to the time of the Tatler cannot be denied, Helen Sard Hughes makes this point very clear; she also lists several conditions in the seventeenth century which were conducive to the interest in letters in the eighteenth century: Letter-writing for purposes of literature or real life received impetus in the seven teenth century from several sources: (1) the emphasis in the school curriculum on the "Calhoun Wlnton, Captain Steele (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1964), p. 105. Hereafter referred to as Win- ton. translation and imitation of Latin epistles; (2) the vogue of the familiar letter in France and England; (3) the Improvement of the postal system in the second half of the seventeenth century, facilitating and stimulating corre spondence; (4) the editing of newspapers and periodicals in letter form; (5) the publica tion of numerous manuals of letter writing.' Of special importance as a precedent for the Tatler. Spec tator. 8ind Guardian is number four: "the editing of news papers and periodicals in letter form." The publication of printed news was not sanctioned in England until the end of the reign of James I.® Many states men and wealthy families, however, had their own private let ter writers to keep them informed. According to Symonds, these professional writers of "letters of news" eventually became quite common. Thus, the term "newsletter" originally had a very literal meaning. Most of the early newspapers were in the form of letters or Included letters in their for mat because most of the news the papers received was derived from real letters. Even closer to the work of Addison and Steele, tempo rally as well as stylistically, than were the early newspapers ^Helen Sard Hughes, "English Epistolary Fiction Before Pamela," The Manly Anniversary Studies in Language and Literature (Chicago; The University of Chicago Press, 1923), p. 156. 8R.V. Symonds, The Rise of English Journalism (Exeter: A. Wheaton and Company, Ltd., 1952), p. 9. This book con tains examples of the work of the outstanding early newswrlt- ers and is the source for most of the information In this paragraph.