CHAPTER 5 Fire Managenent

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER 5 Fire Managenent San Lorenzo Valley Water District Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report CHAPTER 5: FIRE MANAGEMENT 5.0 Introduction Fire is part of an important cycle of natural processes in both plant communities and watersheds. Historically, fire has played a significant role on the watershed lands now owned by the District, both in the forested areas on Ben Lomond Mountain, and in the sandhills plant communities of the District’s Olympia Wellfield. In forested areas, fire has historically contributed to a patchy forest age structure. Patchiness increases the overall health and resilience of the forest through time. Fire regimes vary according to climate, geography, vegetation types, and management practices. The fire regime of the past hundred years has emphasized fire suppression. Ongoing climate change is an increasingly serious concern for watershed managers. Scientists have reported that the warmer and windier conditions corresponding to a doubling of carbon in the atmosphere produce fires that have burned more intensely and spread faster in Northern California (see Paragraph 5.8, Modeling fire). Climate change is likely contributing to increased frequency and severity of wildfires locally, despite fire suppression efforts. Potential impacts to watershed resources from three large Santa Cruz County wildfires in 2008 are discussed in a post-fire study which brings to light many concerns for watershed managers should wildfires continue to increase as a result of climate change (see Paragraph 5.1, 5.1 Historical fire regimes in the Monterey Bay Area). Drier inland forested areas are more prone to fire than moister coastal forests. Forests in areas of high wind are prone to windthrow, which create a significant fuel load. Forests that are predominately redwood (Sequoia Sempervirens) are able to resist the effects of all but the most intense wildfires (Agee, 1993). Because it is the driest time of year, critical fire weather typically occurs in July through October. However, CalFire historical files for the Santa Cruz Mountains indicate that extreme fire conditions, including low humidity and high winds, have frequently occurred from August through early January. For example, in January 1961 six fires were recorded, several of which covered more than 1,000 acres (CalFire, 2008). Typically, redwood forests in the region also include Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus), Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii), and California bay (Umbellularia californica). Redwoods are not fire dependent; that is, they can survive and regenerate without fire. In terms of fuel, redwoods are relatively free of volatile oils and resins, making them somewhat fire-resistant (Lindquist, 1974; as cited by Agee, 1993). Redwoods thrive in coastal areas with summer fog, which helps to lessen fire hazard. In mature upland stands, low intensity fires generally do not kill the overstory conifers, but will kill the tanoaks and other trees (Agee, 1993). Moderate severity fires that scorch the crowns of overstory conifers will generally kill mature Douglas firs, but not redwoods, which will re-sprout and grow a new crown (Agee, 1993). Sandhills chaparral communities have undergone the most dramatic shift in structure due to plant succession in the absence of fire. Aerial photographs during the past 60 years have revealed large increases in woody vegetation and concomitant reductions in open sand areas during this period of fire suppression. The resulting increase in canopy closure reduces the abundance of open sandy habitat required by important sand chaparral plant species. Research suggests that plants Chapter 5: Fire 5-1 05/11/2009 San Lorenzo Valley Water District Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report cannot complete their life cycles in the dense leaf litter and low light of the closed canopy environment (McGraw, 2004). Canopy gaps important for maintaining plant diversity are likely also important for the sandhills fauna, which is impacted by canopy closure due to fire exclusion. Animals may rely on the gaps in the canopy which provide habitat conditions dissimilar from the closed canopy environment including a greater availability of sunlight (e.g. for thermoregulation) and a higher diversity of plants which may provide a variety of food sources not found in the closed canopy (e.g. flowering plants for pollinators, seeds of herbaceous plants for granivores, etc.). Indeed, shrub encroachment due to fire suppression in sandhills chaparral communities is cited as one likely cause for the likely extirpation of the Santa Cruz kangaroo rat from the Bonny Doon Ecological Reserve and Wilder Ranch sandhills sites during the past 20 years (Bean 2003). With respect to watersheds, major wildfires are important aspects of bed sedimentation, erosion and aquatic habitat management throughout the Coast Ranges (Hecht and Kittleson, 1998). Fire suppression and the resulting absence of wildfire over the last few decades increase the chance of a major fire, which could seriously alter surface hydrology and sedimentation (Balance Hydrologics, 2007). 5.1 Historical fire regimes in the Monterey Bay Area Wildfire has long been both a natural occurrence, as well as a land management tool in the Santa Cruz Mountains, since the earliest inhabitants arrived between 30,000 to 10,000 years ago (Balance Hydrologics, 2007). The year 2008 was a significant year for wildfires in Santa Cruz County. In May, the Summit fire burned 4,270 acres in the Browns, Corralitos, Soquel, and Uvas Creek watersheds (State Emergency Assessment Team (SEAT), 2008). In August, the Martin fire burned 520 acres at the Bonny Doon Ecological Preserve in the San Vicente Creek and the Laguna Creek watersheds (SEAT, 2008). SEAT reports conduct rapid assessments on burned areas of wildfires, as well as downstream of burned areas to determine if emergency rehabilitation treatment is needed to minimize risk of threats to human life or property, to minimize or prevent deterioration of water quality, loss of soil productivity due to erosion, or degradation of wildlife and botanical habitat, and cultural resources. The SEAT report (2008) found that the principal concern in the aftermath of the Summit Fire was an increase in the potential for in-channel floods, hyper-concentrated floods, debris torrents, and debris flows. The primary mechanisms for these problems were found to be: 1. The loss of mechanical support of hillslope materials provided by vegetation and vegetative litter; 2. The increase in runoff resulting from reductions in interception and infiltration from the simplification of surface runoff patterns; 3. The loss of mechanical support along stream channels where riparian vegetation was burned. Stephens and Fry (2005) provided a literature review tracing the history of fire in the Santa Cruz Mountains, and documented fire history by analyzing ring counts on live trees, downed logs, and stumps. Native inhabitants burned scrub and grasslands to foster the growth of seed-bearing annuals, and to facilitate acorn gathering (Balance Hydrologics, 2007). Logging operations from Chapter 5: Fire 5-2 05/11/2009 San Lorenzo Valley Water District Watershed Management Plan, Final Version Part I: Existing Conditions Report the late 1800s to the early 1900s relied heavily on fire to reduce slash piles, and to clear land for conversion to grazing and home sites. Fire scars on old growth redwood stumps throughout the watershed serve as historical evidence of these practices (Balance Hydrologics, 2007). Greenlee and Langenheim (1990) distinguished five different historical fire regimes in the Monterey Bay area, which they based on field research they conducted in Big Basin State Park: • Lightning Regime – up to 11,000 before present (BP) • Aboriginal Regime – 11,000 BP - 1792 A.D. • Spanish and Mexican Regime – 1792 – 1848 • Anglo Regime – 1848 - 1929 • Recent Regime – 1929 - present. 5.1.2 Lightning Regime During the lightning fire regime, humans were not yet part of the ecosystem, and lightning accounted for all of the fire ignitions. Over a 50 year period, lightning fires were estimated to cover approximately 37 percent of the redwood forest, over approximately 20 percent of the land surface of Santa Cruz County. The mean fire interval (MFI) in the redwood forests was approximately 135 years (Table 5.1). 5.1.3 Aboriginal Regime Upon arrival of humans, lightning was no longer the main source of fire. People used fire as a management tool. Greenlee and Langenheim (1990) suggest that one of the primary disturbances to vegetation communities resulted when humans arrived and practiced their local fire regimes. Native Americans were nomadic, depending on the seasonal availability of foods. They burned oak savannah and coastal prairie to increase the productivity and collection of acorns, bulbs and other edible plants. The mean interval between fires shortened as a result (Table 5.1). To avoid grizzly bears, humans did not often venture into the redwood or mixed evergreen forests (Greenlee and Langenheim, 1990). However, some of these fires would spread into the forest. Prior to the arrival of European man, forest fires were mostly low intensity ground fires that did not burn into the conifer live crowns. Fires set by Native Americans would burn through the forest often enough to prevent the accumulation of high fuel loads on the forest floor or the occurrence of dense ladder fuels that would carry flames into the canopy. During
Recommended publications
  • Flood Insurance?
    Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program The passage of the Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Program in 2012 has made the community’s long term goals for protecting the future of the Santa Clara Valley possible, including: • Supplying safe, healthy water • Retrofitting dams and critical infrastructure for earthquakes • Reducing toxins, hazards and contaminants • Restoring wildlife habitat in our waterways • Providing natural flood protection Even though we are in a drought, flooding can happen. Santa Clara County has had several damaging floods over the years, Extreme dry conditions can harden the ground. Within the first few most notably in 1995 and 1997 along the Guadalupe River and 1998 days of heavy rain, the ground can deflect water into streams and along Coyote and San Francisquito creeks. Call your city’s floodplain creeks, increasing the chances of flash flooding. It can strike quickly manager or the Santa Clara Valley Water District’s Community with little or no warning. Projects Unit at 408.630.2650 to determine if you are in a floodplain. Floodwater can flow swiftly through neighborhoods and away from The water district’s flood prevention and flood awareness outreach streams when creeks “overbank” or flood. Dangerously fast-moving efforts reduce flood insurance rates by as much as 10 percent. FEMA’s floodwaters can flow thousands of feet away from the flooded creek National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System (CRS) within minutes. evaluates the flood protection efforts that CRS communities make and provides a rating. While the chances may seem slim for a 1 percent flood* to occur, the real odds of a 1 percent flood are greater than one in four during the In our area, *participating CRS communities (noted on the magnet) earn length of a 30-year mortgage.
    [Show full text]
  • D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology
    D.W. ALLEY & Associates Aquatic Biology -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2006 Juvenile Steelhead Densities in the San Lorenzo, Soquel, Aptos and Corralitos Watersheds, Santa Cruz County, California Coastrange Sculpin Photographed by Jessica Wheeler D.W. ALLEY & Associates, Aquatic Biology Don Alley, Chad Steiner and Jerry Smith, Fishery Biologists With Field Assistance from Kristen Kittleson, Dawn Reis and Jessica Wheeler Prepared For the Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Department Government Center, 701 Ocean Street, Room 312, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Funding From the San Lorenzo Valley Water District, Soquel Creek Water District, Lompico County Water District, Cities of Santa Cruz and Watsonville and the County of Santa Cruz May 2007 Project # 200-04 340 Old River Lane • P.O. Box 200 • Brookdale, California 95007 • (831) 338-7971 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPORT SUMMARY...................................................................................10 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................31 I-1. Steelhead and Coho Salmon Ecology...................................................... 31 I-3. Project Purpose and General Study Approach ........................................ 34 METHODS ....................................................................................................35 M-1. Choice of Reaches and Vicinity of Sites to be Sampled- Methods........... 35 M-2. Classification of Habitat Types and Measurement of Habitat Characteristics.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Rock State Park 15000 Skyline Boulevard Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 867-2952
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and xquisite sandstone Castle Rock education of the people of California by helping E to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological State Park diversity, protecting its most valued natural and formations and cultural resources, and creating opportunities for high-quality outdoor recreation. sculpted caves are among the treasured features within this California State Parks supports equal access. park’s vast wilderness. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (408) 867-2952. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov SaveTheRedwoods.org/csp Castle Rock State Park 15000 Skyline Boulevard Los Gatos, CA 95030 (408) 867-2952 © 2011 California State Parks (Rev. 2017) C astle Rock State Park is a place of The Smead and Partridge farms were abundant solitude, wilderness, high cliffs, the largest operations on the ridge, with and sweeping vistas. Unique patterns on orchards of apples, pears, walnuts, and weathered sandstone, lush forests, and grapes. Near the park’s interpretive shelter, stream-fed canyons make up the park’s heritage trees planted in the early 1900s diverse features. still bear fruit. From one of the highest ridges in the Creation of the Park Santa Cruz Mountains, visitors enjoy Judge Joseph Welch of Santa Clara Valley panoramic views of Monterey Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • 1982 Flood Report
    GB 1399.4 S383 R4 1982 I ; CLARA VAltEY WATER DISlRIDl LIBRARY 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSYIAY SAN JOSE. CAUFORN!A 9Sll8 REPORT ON FLOODING AND FLOOD RELATED DAMAGES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY January 1 to April 30, 1982 Prepared by John H. Sutcliffe Acting Division Engineer Operations Division With Contributions From Michael McNeely Division Engineer Design Division and Jeanette Scanlon Assistant Civil Engineer Design Division Under the Direction of Leo F. Cournoyer Assistant Operations and Maintenance Manager and Daniel F. Kriege Operations and Maintenance Manager August 24, 1982 DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS Arthur T. Pfeiffer, Chairman District 1 James J. Lenihan District 5 Patrick T. Ferraro District 2 Sio Sanchez. Vice Chairman At Large Robert W. Gross District 3 Audrey H. Fisher At large Maurice E. Dullea District 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCrfION .......................... a ••••••••••••••••••• 4 •• Ill • 1 STORM OF JANUARY 3-5, 1982 .•.•.•.•.•••••••.••••••••.••.••.••.••••. 3 STORMS OF MARCH 31 THROUGH APRIL 13, 1982 ••.....••••••.•••••••••••• 7 SUMMARY e • • • • • • • • • : • 111 • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1111 o e • e • • o • e • e o e • e 1111 • • • • • e • e 12 TABLES I Storm Rainfall Summary •••••••••.••••.•••••••.••••••••••••• 14 II Historical Rainfall Data •••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••• 15 III Channel Flood Flow Summary •••••.•••••.•••••••••••••••••••• 16 IV Historical Stream flow Data •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 17 V January 3-5, 1982 Damage Assessment Summary •••••••••••••••••• 18 VI March 31 - April 13, 1982 Damage
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Declarations in California
    Disaster Declarations in California (BOLD=Major Disaster) (Wildfires are Highlighted) 2018 DR-4353 Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows, And Debris Flows Declared on Tuesday, January 2, 2018 - 06:00 FM-5244 Pawnee Fire Declared on Sunday, June 24, 2018 - 07:11 FM-5245 Creek Fire Declared on Monday, June 25, 2018 - 07:11 2017 DR-4301 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 13:15 EM-3381 Potential Failure of the Emergency Spillway at Lake Oroville Dam Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:20 DR-4302 Severe Winter Storm Declared on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 - 14:30 DR-4305 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Mudslides Declared on Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 04:48 DR-4308 Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, Mudslides Declared on Saturday, April 1, 2017 - 16:55 DR-4312 Flooding Declared on Tuesday, May 2, 2017 - 14:00 FM-5189 Wall Fire Declared on Sunday, July 9, 2017 - 14:18 FM-5192 Detwiler Fire Declared on Monday, July 17, 2017 - 19:23 DR-4344 Wildfires Declared on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 - 08:40 2016 FM-5124 Old Fire Declared on Saturday, June 4, 2016 - 21:55 FM-5128 Border 3 Fire Declared on Sunday, June 19, 2016 - 19:03 FM-5129 Fish Fire Declared on Monday, June 20, 2016 - 20:35 FM-5131 Erskine Fire Declared on Thursday, June 23, 2016 - 20:57 FM-5132 Sage Fire Declared on Saturday, July 9, 2016 - 18:15 FM-5135 Sand Fire Declared on Saturday, July 23, 2016 - 17:34 FM-5137 Soberanes Fire Declared on Thursday, July 28, 2016 - 16:38 FM-5140 Goose Fire Declared on Saturday, July 30, 2016 - 20:48
    [Show full text]
  • National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend October 3-4, 2015
    Remembering ver in Our Hea Fore rts ® National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend Weekend Memorial Firefighters Fallen National 2015 ® National Fallen Firefighters Foundation Post Office Drawer 498 National Fallen Firefighters Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727 Memorial Weekend 301.447.1365 • 301.447.1645 fax www.firehero.org • [email protected] October 3-4, 2015 matt Ambelas • David Wilbur Anderson • Thomas Araguz III • Samir P. “Sam” Ashmar • matt Ambelas • David Wilbur Anderson • Thomas Araguz III • Samir P. “Sam” Ashmar • Gregory D. Barnas • Jeffery Edward Bayless • Kevin L. Bell • James E. Bethea • Joseph Gregory D. Barnas • Jeffery Edward Bayless • Kevin L. Bell • James E. Bethea • Joseph Edward Bove III • Kevin J. Bristol • Bruce Britt • John M. Burns • Jerry Campbell • Paul S. Edward Bove III • Kevin J. Bristol • Bruce Britt • John M. Burns • Jerry Campbell • Paul S. Cash • Douglas J. Casson • Dennis A. Channell • Richard L. Choate • Joyce M. Craig • Cash • Douglas J. Casson • Dennis A. Channell • Richard L. Choate • Joyce M. Craig • James A. Dickman • Ricky W. Doub • Ted F. Drake • Fred Edwards • Hugh B. Ferguson James A. Dickman • Ricky W. Doub • Ted F. Drake • Fred Edwards • Hugh B. Ferguson III • David P. Fiori • Kellen A. Fleming • Robert William “Bob” Fogle III • Jonathan E. III • David P. Fiori • Kellen A. Fleming • Robert William “Bob” Fogle III • Jonathan E. French • Donovan Artie Garcia Jr. • Michael Dale “Mikey” Garrett • Charles Edward French • Donovan Artie Garcia Jr. • Michael Dale “Mikey” Garrett • Charles Edward Goff • Matthew Goodnature • Daniel David Groover • John Derek Gupton • Ramon Goff • Matthew Goodnature • Daniel David Groover • John Derek Gupton • Ramon Edward “Ray” Hain • Homer W.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence and Distribution of Umbellularia Californica
    THE OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA IN THE BIG BASIN AREA, SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS, CA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Hayward In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Geography By Steven D. Guiney October 1990 THE OCCURRENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF UMBELLULARIA CALIFORNICA IN THE BIG BASIN AREA, SANTA CRUZ MOUNTAINS, CA By Steven D. Guiney Approved: Date: s ~ /?f't1 ~7f~~/W /2 /Vt1Y6H~~ /9?a ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ·· · · · ·· · · 1 II. AN OVERVIEW ·· · · · ·· · ·· · ·· · · 6 III. BIG BASIN PHYTO-PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY ···· 9 IV. HISTORICAL PLANT GEOGRAPHY · · 44 V. ECOLOGICAL PLANT GEOGRAPHY · · · · 47 VI. PHYSIOGRAPHIC PLANT GEOGRAPHY · · · · · · 52 VII. DISTURBANCE FACTORS · · · 54 VIII. CONCLUSIONS · · · · · ··· · · · · · 58 BIBLIOGRAPHY · · · ·· · ·· · ·· 61 iii '""-<-- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure Page 1 Study Area .. · ·· · ··· . 4 2 Elevations . .. · ···· · 11 3 Climatograph Explanation · · · · · · 17 4 Santa Cruz Climatograph · · · 18 5 Henry Cowell Climatograph ·· · 19 6 Ben Lomond Climatograph ·· ·· · · 20 7 Big Basin Climatograph · · ·· · 21 8 Henry Cowell Transects · 24 9 Portola Transects · ·· 25 10 Big Basin Soils ···· . 26 11 Big Basin Vegetation · · ·· 28 Table 1 Individuals/Species. 34 2 Density 35 3 Coverage . 36 iv LIST OF PHOTOS Photo Page SITE 1 37 SITE 2 38 SITE 3 41 SITE 4 42 SITE 5 43 v INTRODUCTION The coastal redwood forest of Central California is composed principally of four kinds of trees: coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens), Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), tan oak (Lithocarpus densiflora) and California bay (Umbellularia californica). All of these are found in Big Basin Redwoods State Park and adjacent areas in the Santa Cruz Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo - Santa Cruz Cloverdale VMP - 2010 6/15/2011 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES................................................. 8 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM ........................................................................................................... 12 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF ASSETS AT RISK ................................................................................ 15 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ........................................................................................................ 17 SECTION IV: PRE FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ................................................................................................................. 18 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY ............................................................... 19 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION .................................................................................. 22 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Griggs, Our Ocean Backyard, Article No. 333.Docx
    Our Ocean Backyard––Santa Cruz Sentinel columns by Gary Griggs, Distinguished Professor of Earth Sciences, UC Santa Cruz #333 January 30, 2021 Rain and Floods We seem to regularly bounce back and forth between drought and flood on the central coast, and this is the way it always seems to have been. As long as people have lived in the Monterey Bay area, they have experienced both dry and wet years, and sometimes back-to-back. As I am writing this on Thursday for submission tonight, we are in the midst of one of our driest winters in years. As of Tuesday at 2:00 pm, Santa Cruz had received just 3.7 inches of rain for the season (which began October 1, 2020), whereas on average we would have been soaked with 16.1 inches. We were at just 23% of normal. By Wednesday afternoon at 2:00, the first of several major storms had landed on us and raised our yearly total to 4.77 inches, raising us to 29% of normal. And then the next storm hit but no data in yet, but debris flow and flood warnings were still on. 1955 was the biggest flood in recent memory, and it washed right through downtown Santa Cruz. Pacific Avenue became a tributary three feet deep. But this was just one of dozens of local floods. In researching the flood history of the region for a recent book (Between Paradise and Peril – The Natural Disaster History of the Monterey Bay Region), I was fascinating to read how many times the downtown area has been flooded, followed by clearing out mud and starting again.
    [Show full text]