Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep ( Ovis Canadensis Canadensis (Shaw, 1804)) Where 4 Large

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep ( Ovis Canadensis Canadensis (Shaw, 1804)) Where 4 Large Canadian Journal of Zoology Bighorn sheep winter habitat selection and seasonal movements in an area of active coal mining Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2016-0069.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 29-Jun-2016 Complete List of Authors: Poole, Kim; Aurora Wildlife Research Serrouya, Robert; University of Alberta, Department of Biological Sciences Teske, Irene; British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource OperationsDraft Podrasky, Kevin; Teck Coal Limited bighorn sheep, British Columbia, coal mining, habitat selection, Ovis Keyword: canadensis, reclamation, winter range https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology 13 July 2016 Kim G. Poole Aurora Wildlife Research 1918 Shannon Point Road, Nelson, BC, V1L 6K1, Canada Tele. (250) 825-4063 e-mail: [email protected] Bighorn sheep winter habitat selection and seasonal movements in an area of active coal mining Kim G. Poole, Rob Serrouya, Irene E. Teske, and Kevin Podrasky K.G. Poole , Aurora Wildlife Research, 1918 Shannon Point Road, Nelson, BC V1L 6K1, Canada [email protected] R. Serrouya , Department of Biological Sciences,Draft University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada [email protected] I. Teske , Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Section, 205 Industrial Road G., Cranbrook, BC V1C 7G5, Canada [email protected] K. Podrasky , Teck Coal Limited, P.O. Box 2003, Sparwood, BC V0B 2G0, Canada [email protected] https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 2 of 46 2 Bighorn sheep winter habitat selection and seasonal movements in an area of active coal mining K.G. Poole, R. Serrouya, I.E. Teske, and K. Podrasky Abstract: Winter is an important period for most mountain ungulates due to limited availability of preferred forage and costs associated with travel through deep snow. We examined winter habitat selection by Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep ( Ovis canadensis canadensis (Shaw, 1804)) where 4 large, open-pit coal mines are in operation. Sheep in this area generally winter at high elevation on windswept, south-facing native grasslands. We used GPS collars and Resource Selection Function analysis to examine movements and habitat selection. Most (79%) of the sheep were migratory and fidelity to winter ranges was high (88%). Sheep showed low use (~10–20%) of mine areas between November and April, followed by increased use peaking at 60–65% in September-October. Wintering sheep were positively associated with highDraft elevations, closeness to escape terrain, and warmer aspects. High-elevation, native grasslands were the highest ranked cover class. Most sheep that used mine areas during winter used reclaimed habitats, primarily reclaimed spoils and pits. Primary winter ranges comprised 4.3% of merged sheep range, emphasizing the limited amount of occupied winter ranges within the landscape. Disturbance to native winter range resulting from development should be minimized or be conducted in a manner that effectively manages and/or mitigates the impacts. Key words: bighorn sheep, British Columbia, coal mining, habitat selection, Ovis canadensis , reclamation, winter range https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 3 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology 3 Introduction Most mountain ungulates exhibit complex spatial and temporal use patterns, in large part because of the effects of winter and seasonality on forage production, availability and quality. Snow and weather influence mountain ungulates by increasing costs of thermoregulation, energetic costs of locomotion and by the burial of preferred forage (Burles and Hoefs 1984; Parker et al. 1984; Daily and Hobbs 1989). Ungulates that typically live at high elevations cope with winter and deep snow cover by using a variety of strategies. Some ungulates alter vegetation use (alpine chamois ( Rupicapra rupicapra (L., 1758)) and Himalayan tahr ( Hemitragus jemlahicus (Smith, 1826)): Forsyth 2000), including movement to areas of heavier cover (mountain caribou ( Rangifer tarandus (Gmelin, 1788)): Apps et al. 2001) or movement to open, high-elevation habitats in shallow snow zones (bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis (Shaw, 1804)): Demarchi et al. Draft2000; mountain goats ( Oreamnos americanus (Blainville, 1816)): Poole et al. 2009; Abruzzo chamois ( R. pyrenaica ornate (Bonaparte, 1845)): Lovari and Cosentino 1986). When snow depths increase, some may move to lower elevations (chamois: Lovari and Cosentino 1986) or to higher elevations later in the winter to areas of deeper snow for access to arboreal forage (mountain caribou: Apps et al. 2001). Lastly, some species move to escape terrain and moderate slopes during winter (Asiatic ibex ( Capra ibex sibrica (Pallas, 1776)) and blue sheep ( Pseudois nayaur (Hodgson, 1833)): Namgail 2006). Habitat selection by ungulates is thought to be a trade-off between nutritional and anti- predation constraints (Festa-Bianchet 1988 a; Hebblewhite and Merrill 2011). In western North America, seasonal habitat selection by bighorn sheep varies among populations likely in response to both predation risk and snow depth (Shackleton et al. 1999; Demarchi et al. 2000; Krausman and Bowyer 2003). Proximity to escape terrain is an important aspect of most sheep habitat selection (e.g., Tilton and Willard 1982; DeCesare and Pletscher 2006; Bleich et al. 2009). https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Canadian Journal of Zoology Page 4 of 46 4 The east side of the Elk Valley in southeastern British Columbia (BC) is home to a population of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep ( O. c. canadensis ) of provincial significance; the Ewin Ridge sheep range has been considered the most important bighorn sheep winter range in BC (Demarchi 1968). Sheep typically winter at lower elevations to avoid deep snows that accumulate in most parts of their range (e.g., Tilton and Willard 1982), however, sheep in the Elk Valley are unique as they generally winter at high elevation on windswept, south-facing native grasslands. Lower elevation habitat in this area is primarily forested with heavy snow accumulation. The Elk Valley supports important industrial activities, primarily coal mining and forestry. Four large, open-pit coal mines occur within the east side of the Elk Valley (Fig. 1), and sheep use areas of some mine sites to varying extent year-round (K. Podrasky, Teck Coal, unpubl. data). Coal mines can create bighorn sheep habitat where none Draftexisted previously, as has occurred at mines in the Alberta foothills (MacCallum 1991; MacCallum and Geist 1992). At these Alberta mines, bighorn sheep from the adjacent occupied alpine habitat responded to the mine reclamation by occupying the new habitats, expanding their range, and exhibiting rapid population growth. Bighorn sheep also can use urban environments, which can provide higher forage quality (Rubin et al. 2002; Dibb et al. 2008). While human disturbance (e.g., noise, activity) from mines do not appear to deter use by sheep per se (Oehler et al. 2005; Jansen et al. 2006, 2009; Bleich et al. 2009), expansion of coal mining may cause direct loss of winter range. Winter range is important habitat for bighorn sheep (Demarchi et al. 2000), and has been suggested as the single most important factor limiting sheep populations in the Elk Valley area (Schuerholz 1984). The late winter/early spring (green-up) period is particularly important, as delayed green-up may cause starvation in sheep populations (Burles and Hoefs 1984). Identifying high value habitats can help assess and manage the potential impacts of industrial activities. There is concern about management of mountain sheep and the potential impacts that habitat alteration might have on those ungulates (Bleich et al. 2009). Incomplete knowledge about bighorn https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 5 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology 5 sheep ecology, including important winter use areas and habitat selection, can be an obstacle to coordinating sheep management activities. We hypothesized that ( i) winter habitat selection would differ between sheep wintering on native grasslands and those using active coal mine areas because of limitations to how mine areas can duplicate establishment of native ranges, and ( ii ) greater winter severity would result in smaller seasonal range size and decreased sheep survival. The information collected in this study could be applied to other regions where mountain ungulate range and resource development overlap. Materials and methods Study area The 830 km 2 study area is located in the Rocky Mountains of southeastern BC, and focused on bighorn sheep populations wintering east Draftof the Elk River and stretching up to the Continental Divide (Fig. 1). Biogeoclimatic zones within the study area grade from Montane Spruce dry cool (MSdk) in valley bottoms, Engelmann Spruce–Subalpine Fir dry cool (ESSFdk, including subalpine parkland) at higher elevations, to small amounts of Alpine Tundra (AT) on ridge and mountain tops (Braumandl and Curran 1992). Krummholz subalpine fir ( Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt.) with scattered whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis (Engelm.) Rydb.) dominate the treeline, whereas closed to open stands of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry), subalpine fir, lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud.), and aspen ( Populus tremuloides Michx) are found at lower elevations. Cliffs of various sizes, and open scree slopes and meadows are located
Recommended publications
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Elk Valley Conservation Action Forum Summary Report
    Elk Valley Conservation Action Forum Summary Report Photos (top clockwise): KCP, Dave White, Lyle Grisdale, Internet Prepared by: Kootenay Conservation Program1 June 25, 2019 1 Juliet Craig, Program Manager, www.koootenayconservation.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... iv I. Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Taking a Conservation Neighbourhood Approach ..................................................................... 3 III. Conservation Values and Threats .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Developing Conservation Priorities ........................................................................................... 8 Science Presentations ................................................................................................................. 8 Themes Guiding Small Group Discussions .................................................................................. 9 Conservation Priorities ................................................................................................................ 9 V. Elk Valley Forum Action Plans .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elk Valley Bighorn Sheep Project
    Sheep on Ewin Ridge, February 2010; Photo: I. Teske Habitat use, seasonal movements, and population dynamics of bighorn sheep in the Elk Valley Prepared for: BC Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations 205 Industrial Road G. Cranbrook, BC V1C 7G5 and Teck Coal Limited P.O Box 2003 Sparwood, BC V0B 2G0 Prepared by: Kim G. Poole Aurora Wildlife Research 1918 Shannon Point Road, Nelson BC V1L 6K1 Tele. (250) 825-4063; e-mail: [email protected] May 2013 Elk Valley bighorn sheep project Executive summary Winter is a critical season for most mountain ungulates, which use a variety of strategies to cope with burial of preferred forage and increased cost of locomotion in snow. Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis) inhabit the east side of the Elk Valley in southeastern British Columbia where forestry and 4 large, open-pit coal mines are in operation. Sheep in this area generally winter at high elevation on windswept, south-facing native grasslands, with some sheep also wintering on mine properties. Expansion of coal mining is proposed in portions of the valley which may result in direct loss of high-elevation winter range, which in some instances can result in the creation of winter habitat through reclamation of mine disturbance. Winter range may be the single most important factor limiting sheep populations in the area. The primary objectives of this study were to describe seasonal movements, winter habitat selection, and use of mine properties by this population. A concurrent companion study examined winter range plant communities and plant production, range condition, and winter diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Conference
    Mining Conference January 23, 2020 Fraser Phillips, Senior Vice President Investor Relations and Strategic Analysis Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Statements Both these slides and the accompanying oral presentations contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and forward-looking information within the meaning of the Securities Act (Ontario) and comparable legislation in other provinces (collectively referred to herein as forward-looking statements). Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variation of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Teck to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include statements relating to management’s expectations with respect to: the goals stated in "Key Priorities"; future value catalysts; Teck’s capital priorities and objectives of its capital allocation framework, including with respect to its dividend policy (including
    [Show full text]
  • F L NAL RE PORT
    Final report - mineral resources of northern Alaska Item Type Technical Report Authors Heiner, L.E.; Wolff, E.N. Citation Heiner, L.E. and Wolff, E.N., 1968, Final report - mineral resources of northern Alaska: University of Alaska Mineral Industry Research Laboratory Report No. 16, 306 p., 4 sheets. Publisher University of Alaska Mineral Industry Research Laboratory Download date 05/10/2021 08:34:04 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/1065 F l NAL RE PORT MINERAL RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ALASKA M.I. R.L. Report No. 16 Submitted to the NORTH Commission Mineral Industry Research Laboratory University of Alaska Lawrence E. Heiner Ernest N. Wofff Editors University of Alaska Colorado State University June, 1968 Reprinted October, 1969 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It would be impossible to name all those who have contributed information and ideas to this report, through discussions, correspondence, or through access to unpublished material. The debt to those who have published information is acknowledged in the text and in the list of references in the back of the report. In addition, James A. Williams, Director of the State Division of Mine and Minerals, and Gordon Herreid of the same office, have given much of their time, allowed access to Division files, and provided working space in their office. Earl H. Beistline, Dean of the College of Earth Sciences and Mineral Industry, has helped greatly in expediting the work. George Grye, U. S. Geological Survey, has been most helpful in supplying information on Survey activities. C. L. Sainsbury and Peter 0. Sandvik have contributed ideas through discussions. Alan Doyle, Carl Heflinger, Douglas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Fernie & Elk Valley
    Fernie & Elk Valley Cultural Guide WINTER 2018-2019 Photo: Vince Mo Mo Vince Photo: | Issue # 10 Issue ElkVallEyCulturE.Com | TOURISmFErNIE.COM WINTER 2018-2019 | ISSUE #10 A GUIDE TO ARTS, CULTURE AND HERITAGE IN FERNIE & THE ELK VALLEY Featured Events 4 Winter 2018-2019 Events Calendar 7 Fernie Museum 10 Fernie’s Founding Fathers 12 Featured Business: Element 7 Nine 15 The Arts Station 16 Galleries & Studios 18 Attractions 20 Featured Artist: Sandra Barrett 22 The Communities Sounds Like Fernie 25 of the Elk Valley Fernie Heritage Library 26 In the heart of the majestic Canadian SPARWOOD lies in the middle of Featured Author: Terry Nelson 27 Rocky Mountains, the Elk Valley is a the valley and is the first community The Ktunaxa Nation 28 hidden oasis of verdant landscapes, reached on entering from Alberta. The Built Heritage: Vogue Theatre 29 charming towns and abundant town’s name is derived from the local Downtown Walking Tour 30 recreation. For over 100 years, trees that were used for manufacturing Coming in Spring & Summer 34 pioneers have travelled to the region, spars for ocean vessels. The town The Coal Creek Barn 36 first in search of valuable minerals, and was founded as a new home for the now seeking a sanctuary focused on residents of the temporary communities View the Cultural Guide content and past issues online family, community and the beautiful of Michel and Natal. Several art murals at ElkValleyCulture.com outdoors. Mining still forms the base can be seen here, depicting the strong of a thriving economy that has now connection to coal mining, with some diversified and welcomes a variety of by Michelle Loughery who was born artisans, small businesses, and an active in the area and went on to become a year-round recreational and cultural world-renowned muralist.
    [Show full text]
  • East Kootenay Bighorn Sheep Surveys 2019
    Chauncey Ridge rams. Photo: I. Teske East Kootenay bighorn sheep inventory January-February 2019 Prepared for: BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development 205 Industrial Road G. Cranbrook, BC V1C 7G5 Prepared by: Kim G. Poole Aurora Wildlife Research 1918 Shannon Point Road, Nelson BC V1L 6K1 Tele. (250) 825-4063; e-mail: [email protected] April 2019 East Kootenay bighorn sheep surveys 2019 Executive summary To support management of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in the East Kootenay we conducted aerial sheep surveys within 8 Population Management Units (PMUs) during January-February 2019. We used 38.9 hours of helicopter time and flew 27.6 hours on survey. We observed 1,246 bighorn sheep in 151 groups during surveys. Using the standardized 80% sightability correction factor to the aerial survey count then added additional animals from ground counts not accounted for during aerial surveys, a total of 1,596 sheep were estimated within the survey area. Estimated lamb:ewe ratios were >30 lambs:100 ewes in all PMUs and averaged 41:100 overall. Estimated ram ratios ranged from 35–85 rams:100 ewes and averaged 50:100 overall. We used a sightability model to obtain an estimate of 1,648 (±150 ][90% CI]) sheep. The model calculated an overall average sightability of 0.77; sightability was lowest for Class IV rams (0.68). These inventory data fed into the Kootenay Region bighorn sheep management plan process being completed in 2019. Aurora Wildlife Research Page ii East Kootenay bighorn sheep surveys 2019 Table of Contents Executive summary ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Great War and Interprovincial Boundary Survey Names
    Fort B r Nelson e w ³ s t e r C r Prince Rupert Prince George Spray Lakes Reservoir Kamloops !!! Vancouver Nestor Peak K A N Victoria A N Mount Assiniboine ! Mount Turner A ! S Provincial Park ! K ! Mount Morrison !! I S !! Aurora Mountain !!! ! Mount Byng ! Mount Birdwood !! ! Mount Currie !! R I Mount Queen Elizabeth Mount Sir Douglas V !! E Mount Brussilof ! Mount Robertson R Mount Leval !!! !!! Mount Smith-Dorrien !!! !!! Mount Leman !!! !!! !!! Mount Jellicoe !!!!!! !!! Mount King Albert !!! Mount Maude Mount LeRoy Mount Monro ! !! Mount Beatty Lower Kananaskis !!! Lake Mount Arethusa Kootenay Mount Putnik !! National ! Park Mount McHarg !!! Mount Lyautey Upper ! Kananaskis !! Lake Mount Tyrwhitt K !!! Defender Mountain !! ! ! Mount Sarrail O !!! !! !!! Onslow Mountain !!! Mount Foch O Mount Northover !!! Mount Pétain T Warrior Mountain !!! !!! Mount Castelnau !!! !!! ! Mount Aosta E Mount Cordonnier !!! !! !!! !!! Mount McCuaig Mount Odlum Mount Mangin ! N !! Mount Joffre Mount Nivelle Mount Loomis ! A !! Height of the Mount Cadorna Mount Bishop Rockies Provincial !!! !!! H I G Y Park H Mount Abruzzi W ! O R !! O E D I V R R Mount Strachan !!! I Elk Lakes Provincial V ! Park !! Mount Maclaren !!! Mount Armstrong E N O R ! Mount Bolton R T !! H Mount Cornwell!!! !!! Baril Peak W Connor H ! Lakes Courcelette Peak!! I T ! E Mount Etherington !! Mount Scrimger !!! !( Fairmont R !!! I Mount Holcroft V ! Hot Springs E Mount Farquhar !! R Mount Pierce !!! E R !! E Mount O'Rourke! W L C V H o I l Columbia Lake K u I R m Provincial Park
    [Show full text]