Religious Pluralism in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religious Pluralism in the United States THE BOISI CENTER PAPERS ON RELIGION IN THE UNITED STATES Religious Pluralism in the United States The apparent discrepancy between high levels of religious identity and an overwhelmingly secular popular culture in the United States can be baffling to outsiders. This paper aims to shed light on that paradox by exploring the role that the country's founding principles and history have played in forging a genuinely pluralistic environment. It will present religious pluralism as a desirable ideal in which Americans continue to place their faith. INTRODUCTION Foreign observers of American religion often note This paper aims to acquaint readers with both the the paradoxical existence of both high levels of breadth of this diversity and its historical professed Christian faith and an avowedly secular, development in order to provide a more nuanced even hedonistic, popular culture. There is truth in portrait of the American religious landscape. By both observations, but neither fully captures the way of example, it will pay particular attention to richness and complexity of the American religious the role of Islam in American society and to the landscape. Most Americans identify themselves as unique case of the Mormons, who are formally Christian, but American Christianity is known as members of the Church of Jesus Christ astonishingly diverse: hundreds of different of the Latter-day Saints. The focus on Islam is a Christian denominations coexist, and no one function of the increasing importance and person or group can rightly claim to represent all visibility of the approximately three million Christians. Moreover, religious diversity extends Muslims now present in the United States. The well beyond Christianity: Jews, Muslims focus on the Mormons reflects the particularly Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, Zoroastrians, and compelling insight into the religious and social adherents of many other faith traditions all consciousness of the American people that their flourish here, making the United States one of experience provides. the most religiously diverse nations in the world. The United States is also widely known for its The paper will also distinguish between the mere secular legal system and materialistic popular diversity of religious faiths and religious culture, yet neither of these has dampened the pluralism as a normative ideal. The ideal of population’s persistent religious vitality. religious pluralism becomes a reality when adherents of different faith traditions are free to express their beliefs in ways that uphold the peace the Hebrew Scriptures), worship one God, and and well-being—the common good—of society. In have in recent history engaged in mutual support this sense, pluralism is something that is achieved of one another. Nevertheless, the Jewish and rather than simply given. It has been said that Christian traditions are distinct to the extent that achieving such pluralism entails participating in Christians accept Jesus Christ as the Messiah and the very “idea of America” in that the United Savior whereas Jews reject such claims. Referring States was founded on the constitutional ideals of to the United States as a Judeo-Christian nation religious freedom, and liberty and justice for all. also overstates the Jewish influence. Jews were But Americans have not always lived up to these present in the United States only in very small ideals. Consequently, this paper describes some of numbers until the late nineteenth-century, and the darkest moments in American history, before even today amount to no more than two percent of concluding with a brief consideration of the the population. Currently about eighty-five benefits and dangers of the United States’ percent of Americans identify themselves as commitment to religious pluralism. Catholic or Protestant Christians. There is immense diversity within American Before proceeding, a few comments about the Christianity—dozens of independent Protestant description of the United States as a "Judeo- denominations or sects and various sub-groups Christian" nation—which this paper will avoid— within Catholicism—but the predominance of are in order. The term "Judeo-Christian" Christianity provides crucial context to any emerged in the nineteen-thirties as a discussion of religious pluralism in the United counterweight to Fascist anti-semitism and then States. Finally, viewing the United States as a served as moral ballast for Western democracies Judeo-Christian country overlooks other non- during the Cold War. But the term suffers from a Christian communities of faith experiencing number of shortcomings. To begin with, it too growth in the United States, including Islam. easily conflates the Jewish and Christian Christianity may still dominate the religious traditions. It is true that these traditions hold landscape of the United States, but religious certain sacred texts in common (namely those pluralism has now become its defining feature. which Christians call either the Old Testament or RELIGIOUS DIVERSITY IN AMERICAN HISTORY Religion in the American Colonies paper on church-state separation for an extended discussion of religious establishment and It should be noted at the outset that Americans religious freedom.) Some states maintained an have not always promoted religious pluralism as established church even after the United States an ideal. On the contrary, religious was founded (the First Amendment only forbade establishment—not religious freedom—was the establishment at the federal level), and it was not norm in colonial America. (See the companion until 1833 that Massachusetts forswore 2 establishment altogether. The Puritans, an ascetic discipleship of Christ that eschews violence and group of Protestants, controlled the social and results in a withdrawal from the modern world. political life of colonial Massachusetts, and other They are congregated primarily in Pennsylvania, religious practices were not tolerated. In fact, the Ohio and Indiana. present state of Rhode Island began as a refuge for banished religious dissidents, including Roger In the southern regions, Protestant slaveholders Williams and Anne Hutchinson, who in the mid- often forced their African slaves (some of whom 1600s advocated toleration for non-Puritan had been Muslims) to become Christians. Many interpretations of Christianity. The Quakers, a slaves, however, mixed elements of their own sect many at the time considered non-Christian, spiritual heritage with the Christian faith of their were also banished from Massachusetts; those captors. The Native American experience often unwilling to leave were subject to the death mirrored that of the African slaves; Catholic and penalty. Indeed, in what was one of the earliest Protestant missionaries aggressively proselytized instances of religious violence in colonial North native peoples who held onto their own spiritual America, four Quakers were hanged in Boston practices in spite of Christian influences. The between 1659 and 1661. Like Massachusetts, ability of the African slaves and the Native Virginia also had an established religion during Americans to preserve aspects of their own non- the colonial period. Virginia’s original charter Christian traditions was a triumph in the face of stipulated that its religious life was to be governed forced or heavily coerced conversions, but the by “the ecclesiastical laws of England.” Thus, the result was a large amount of religious syncretism. governor exercised formal jurisdiction over many Consequently, the efforts of some colonies to aspects of church life prior to the revolutionary encourage a uniform Christian faith were never era. likely to prevail in the new world. As a new and vast territory, the United States lacked historical At the same time that Massachusetts and Virginia traditions and institutions, and it also abounded in maintained their religious establishments, space; these factors naturally fostered religious settlers in the other eleven colonies practiced diversity. Individuals and groups who disagreed several versions of Protestantism as well as with the prevailing religious norms in one place Catholicism. In Maryland, for instance, could simply move to another. Thus the Quakers Catholicism was the primary Christian religion. moved to a region distant from the Puritan The Quakers—unwelcome, as we have seen, in centers of power and the Mennonites separated Massachusetts—moved to Pennsylvania to avoid themselves entirely from the broader community. persecution. Also in Pennsylvania, a small group When faiths collided, as they often did in Puritan of Mennonite Christians—followers of Menno New England, Puritans typically banished Simons and descendants of the radical Anabaptist religious undesirables to the vast unsettled wing of the Protestant Reformation—found a safe territories of the new continent. Furthermore, the haven from persecution in Holland in 1683. colonists who arrived from England were making Mennonites have continued to immigrate to the a new American history. Accordingly, the United States and today constitute a small but religious conflicts of Europe lost some of their viable community, stressing an uncompromising intensity on these shores. 3 Early National Period movements encountered criticism from “mainline” Protestants who questioned the The ratification of the United States Constitution devotion of the revivalists. The revivalists also in 1788 ensured that religious diversity would criticized each other and splintered still further continue to develop in the United
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Teenagers' Syncretism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 2010 Jewish Teenagers’ Syncretism Philip Schwadel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Sociology Commons Schwadel, Philip, "Jewish Teenagers’ Syncretism" (2010). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 174. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/174 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Review of Religious Research (2010) 51(3): 324-332. Copyright 2010, Springer. Used by permission. Jewish Teenagers’ Syncretism Philip Schwadel, Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska- Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA; [email protected] With the rapid rise of Jewish interfaith marriage and the migration of Jews away from traditional Jewish neighborhoods, many Jewish teenagers in the U.S. have little interaction with other Jews and little exposure to the Jewish religion. Here I use National Study of Youth and Religion survey data to examine Jewish teenagers’ syncretism or acceptance of different religious forms. The results show that Jewish teens are more syncretic than oth- er teens, and that variations in religious activity, an emphasis on personal religiosity, and living in an interfaith home explain some of the difference in syncretism between Jew- ish and non-Jewish teens.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Diversity in America an Historical Narrative
    Teaching Tool 2018 Religious Diversity in America An Historical Narrative Written by Karen Barkey and Grace Goudiss with scholarship and recommendations from scholars of the Haas Institute Religious Diversity research cluster at UC Berkeley HAASINSTITUTE.BERKELEY.EDU This teaching tool is published by the Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society at UC Berkeley This policy brief is published by About the Authors Citation the Haas Institute for a Fair and Karen Barkey is Professor of Barkey, Karen and Grace Inclusive Society. This brief rep- Sociology and Haas Distinguished Goudiss. “ Religious Diversity resents research from scholars Chair of Religious Diversity at in America: An Historical of the Haas Institute Religious Berkeley, University of California. Narrative" Haas Institute for Diversities research cluster, Karen Barkey has been engaged a Fair and Inclusive Society, which includes the following UC in the comparative and historical University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley faculty: study of empires, with special CA. September 2018. http:// focus on state transformation over haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/ Karen Munir Jiwa time. She is the author of Empire religiousdiversityteachingtool Barkey, Haas Center for of Difference, a comparative study Distinguished Islamic Studies Published: September 2018 Chair Graduate of the flexibility and longevity of Sociology Theological imperial systems; and editor of Union, Berkeley Choreography of Sacred Spaces: Cover Image: A group of people are march- Jerome ing and chanting in a demonstration. Many State, Religion and Conflict Baggett Rossitza of the people are holding signs that read Resolution (with Elazar Barkan), "Power" with "building a city of opportunity Jesuit School of Schroeder that works for all" below.
    [Show full text]
  • The Problem of Religious Pluralism
    Scholars Crossing Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Philosophy 2008 The Problem of Religious Pluralism Michael S. Jones Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/phil_fac_pubs Part of the Christianity Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Jones, Michael S., "The Problem of Religious Pluralism" (2008). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 4. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/phil_fac_pubs/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Problem of Religious Pluralism Michael S. Jones, PhD The “problem of religious pluralism” engages several distinct but interrelated issues. The “problem” arises when one considers the variety of religious beliefs and practices in the world and, taking into consideration both their similarities and differences, attempts to formulate a coherent position on their origin, truthfulness, soteriological efficacy, and value in general. Of these questions, the one that has received the most treatment is the question of the soteriological efficacy of the world’s religions. That all religions contain some truth is not generally disputed: Zoroastrianism, Judaism, and Islam have the truth of monotheism, for example; some versions of Hinduism are also theistic in their final analysis of ultimate reality (see, for example, the theologies of Sankara and Ramanuja) and have well-developed theodicies, epistemologies, and absolutist ethical systems; the central role of self-giving love in Mahayana Buddhism certainly has biblical parallels, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2017 840:212:03 Religions of the Western World MW (2:15-3:35) HCK 214/DC
    Rutgers University Dept. of Religion (848-932-9641) Fall 2017 840:212:03 Religions of the Western World MW (2:15-3:35) HCK 214/DC Instructor: Dr. James Pavlin Office: Loree Bldg. 134/DC Office Hours: MW 4:30-5:00 by appointment only, or before/after class in the classroom Email: [email protected] Course Description: The purpose of the course is to introduce the student to the academic study of religion by focusing on the monotheistic religions of the Near Eastern and Western traditions. After reviewing current methodologies and concepts related to the study of religion, the course will focus on the origin and development of the scriptures, beliefs, and practices of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Each religion will be studied with particular attention paid to readings of primary sources related to origins and historical developments in terms of theology, mysticism, and authority. SAS Core Code: Historical Analysis (HST), Social Analysis (SCL), Philosophical and Theoretical Issues (AHo) Required Texts: Ludwig, Theodore M. The Sacred Paths of the West, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc., 2006. ISBN: 0-13-153906-X Van Voorst, Robert E. Anthology of World Scriptures: Western Religions. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2007. ISBN: 0-495-17059-3 Study and Research Resources: The classroom experience will be enhanced through the use of Rutgers’s web based interactive technology called Sakai. All students are required to know how to use Sakai. Although this course is not designed to be an online or hybrid course, Sakai will be our main means of communication outside the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Politics in Ancient Egypt
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES ISSN Print: 2156-1540, ISSN Online: 2151-1559, doi:10.5251/ajsms.2012.3.3.93.98 © 2012, ScienceHuβ, http://www.scihub.org/AJSMS Religion and politics in ancient Egypt Etim E. Okon Ph.D. Department of Religious and Cultural Studies, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria. ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to examine the pervasive influence of religion on politics in a monarchical ancient African kingdom. After a critical reflection on the mythology and cultus of the Sun-God, the apotheosis of the Pharaoh and the cult of the dead in ancient Egyptian society, it was found that religion was indispensable in ancient Egypt. Religion and politics in ancient Egyptian society were inseparable. Ancient Egyptians were incurably religious. Social and political life was a religious phenomenon. The king of Egypt, Pharaoh was not only despotic, but comprehensively authoritarian. Ancient Egyptian society was a monarchy. The idea of democracy was unknown in ancient Egypt. Key words: Religion and Politics in Ancient Egypt; Egypt and the Sun-God; Egyptian Mythology; INTRODUCTION differences. It is also evident that even though the god – Ra, was known by seventy-five different Religion was the dominant social force in ancient names, very few of the hundreds of deities were Egypt. Religious influence was pervasive affecting worshiped nationally. The most influential pantheon almost everything. Egyptian religion developed from was made up of the trinity – Osiris, Isis (his wife), and simple polytheism to philosophic monotheism, with Horus (his son). Egyptians also worshiped the every community having a guardian deity which “cosmic” gods under the leadership of Ra, the sun- personified the powers of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • (LPHS) (World Geography) Outreach Learning March 30- April 3, 2020
    (LPHS) (World Geography) Outreach Learning March 30- April 3, 2020 World Geography Week of 3/30-4/3 Teacher/Team: 7th Period If there are any questions, please feel free to email me/us at: 8th Period (Email Address of the Teacher Link to TEAMS Folder Previous Lessons: Link to: (Resources). Objectives Objective / I Can: · Create a table on the major religions of East Asia (Shintoism, Confucianism, and Buddhism) and compare to Western religion · Create a timeline of 2 major historical events of the 20th Century to the present that impacted each country. Activities Student Activities: (Resources, videos for students to use.) Go to Teams Folder. Look for the assignment: 1. East Asia Culture (over religions) · Watch the power point. Each religion has a short video attached. You must watch each video before completing the table (attached to the power point). · Write a paragraph comparing these Eastern Religions to Western Religions. 2. Research on-line for the history of each country of East Asia - China, Mongolia, Japan, Taiwan, North Korea and South Korea (must be from the 20th century to present). · Create a timeline of 2 major events for each country with the date, event described, and why it was important (impacted the country) · Submit on a word document (LPHS) (World Geography) Outreach Learning March 30- April 3, 2020 Academic/Instructional Support Schedule: Teacher Support – TEAMS/E-Mail ([email protected]) Office Hours 8am-12pm M-F To Be Graded Assignment for students to submit to TEAMS Folder: 1. Religions assignment will be graded based on 100 points. 2. Timeline assignment will be graded based on 100 points.
    [Show full text]
  • Syncretism of Islam and Javanism
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 154 International Conference on Culture and Language in Southeast Asia (ICCLAS 2017) Syncretism of Islam and Javanism Siti Aliyuna Pratisti Department of International Relation, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, Indonesia [email protected] Abstract— Islamic studies have its own dynamics in the Javanese intertwined, as what we embrace now as Indonesia. tradition. Islam sharing its space with cultural values that have A specific persona which shaped by an intercultural cross rooted in Javanese traditions. This intersection raises an between Islam and Old Javanese Tradition famously interesting variant of Islam, but the debate about whether Islamic conceptualized as “Islam Kejawen”. The concept has been Javanism is also Islam continues to color the development of studied in numerous research by scholars – a wide landscape Islam in Java. This study will examine various interpretations to present the main ideas about Kejawen Islam. It will also explore of study, extend from the arrival of Islam in Java to the latest how the syncretism of Islam in Java produces a culture of dynamic in the twenty-first century. But this quantity of study tolerance through an understanding of ethical relativism in the has not solved the continuing debate on Islam Kejawen which context of Javanese culture, which is now increasingly eroded centered in two dividing paradigms holds widely on their from people's memories. views of what Islam Kejawen exactly is. The first paradigm features the separation of religion and culture, with bold Keywords— cultural diffusion; ethical relativism; syncretism. idiom: "that Islam and Kejawen are entirely separated principle", they stand for the purity of Islam and the elimination of Kejawen practice in society.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Toleration As Political Theology in the Mongol World Empire of the Thirteenth Century Author(S): Christopher P
    Validation by Holiness or Sovereignty: Religious Toleration as Political Theology in the Mongol World Empire of the Thirteenth Century Author(s): Christopher P. Atwood Reviewed work(s): Source: The International History Review, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Jun., 2004), pp. 237-256 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40109471 . Accessed: 22/09/2012 18:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The International History Review. http://www.jstor.org CHRISTOPHER P. ATWOOD Validationby Holiness or Sovereignty: Religious Toleration as PoliticalTheology in the Mongol World Empireof the Thirteenth Century conquerors have been famous for religious toleration since the time of Edward Gibbon. The willingness to patronize many religions and to acknowledge their followers as praying to the same heaven comes as a refreshing change for students of the Middle Ages. Gibbon pioneered the use of the Mongol case to criticize medieval obscurantism when he interpolated into his account of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire a digression on the religious policy of Chinggis Khan. In the midst of a story whose master narrative was the triumph of barbarism and religion over Roman civility, he found a barbarian whose religious policy anticipated that of the Enlightenment, the second age of civility: But it is the religion of Zingis [Chinggis] that best deserves our wonder and ap- plause.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertations Graduate Research 2009 A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model Haejong Je Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Je, Haejong, "A Critical Evaluation of John Hick's Religious Pluralism in Light of His Eschatological Model" (2009). Dissertations. 70. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dissertations/70 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL by Haejong Je Adviser: John T. Baldwin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Dissertation Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JOHN HICK’S RELIGIOUS PLURALISM IN LIGHT OF HIS ESCHATOLOGICAL MODEL Name of researcher: Haejong Je Name and degree of faculty adviser: John T. Baldwin, Ph.D. Date approved: April 2009 Introduction to the Problem The philosophy of John Hick, who is famous for his religious pluralism, has received vigorous study in terms of its epistemology, authority, the concept of God, and Christology. However, less attention has been given to his pareschatology. As explained below, initial investigation shows that there is a need for in-depth study of Hick’s religious philosophy in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Aboriginal Responses to New Age Religion: a Textual ' Interpretation
    Volume 14, Number 1 65 THREE ABORIGINAL RESPONSES TO NEW AGE RELIGION: A TEXTUAL ' INTERPRETATION David Pecotic University of Sydney Contemporary students of indigenous religions begin their inquiries by deconstructing misrepresentations about the people they wish to study empirically. Such scholars simultaneously dismiss the New Age as hegemonic and intrusive or destructive of native traditions. The relationship of indigenous peoples toward the New Age, in this case Australian Aboriginal religionists, is ambiguous by comparison. It is the task of this article to examine the continuum of relationships between New Age religion and Aboriginal religions, and to make clearer some of the reasons for this ambiguity. 1. Methodological considerations The approach taken in this paper to the examination of the possible relationships between Aboriginal religions and New Age religion takes its cue from the importance of New Age texts to past successful research concerning New Age religion (Hanegraaff, 1996; Heelas, 1996). However, the texts chosen are instead sourced in different kinds of indigenous self-understanding about New Age religion: The Rock. Travelling to Uluru (Hill, 1994); Yorro Yorro. Aboriginal Creation and the Renewal ofNature: Rock Paintings and Stories from the Australian Kimberleys (Mowaljarlai & Malnic, 1993); Messengers of the Gods. Tribal Elders Reveal the Ancient Wisdom ofthe Earth (Cowan 1993); 'Australian Aboriginal Tradition' (Mafi-Williams, 1999); Dreamkeepers. A Spirit-Journey intoAborigilialAustralia (Arden, 1994). In all cases, the texts are explicitly dialogical, written as a response to perceived non-indigenous beliefs. Both New Age religion and Aboriginal religions should be treated as ernie designations and for both the etic is ultimately what research should elucidate (Harris, 1979, especially 51-53).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity Without Pluralism: Religious Landscape in Mainland China
    religions Article Diversity without Pluralism: Religious Landscape in Mainland China Yongjia Liang Department of Sociology, National University of Singapore, 11 Arts Link, #04-25, Singapore 117570, Singapore; [email protected] Received: 3 October 2017; Accepted: 9 January 2018; Published: 12 January 2018 Abstract: The paper explores religious diversity and pluralism in the religioscape of mainland China with three examples. While religious diversity is de facto practice, “religious pluralism” is not socially recognised, culturally legitimised, or discursively institutionalised. On the one hand, state co-option of religious groups is achieved through particular definition of “religion” without the conceptualisation of pluralism, leaving undefined religious activities to cultural policy or national security measures. On the other hand, practices that might be identified as religious elsewhere does not usually self-identified as such, not to say seek for the right of religious freedom. To explain the absence of articulated/institutionalised “religious pluralism” in China, the paper provides three examples—civil activism against tomb-levelling campaign, “the Society of Disciples” (mentuhui), and a ritual service provider. The paper argues that the religioscape of mainland China is one with de facto religious diversity without the ideology of religious pluralism, because the diverse religious practices do not make a conscious reference to pluralism, remain non-institutional, disinterested in religious freedom, and, most important of all, below
    [Show full text]
  • Pluralism and Religious Freedom
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 15 Issue 6 Article 2 12-1995 Pluralism and Religious Freedom Alan Geyer Wesley Theological Seminary, Washington, D.C. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Geyer, Alan (1995) "Pluralism and Religious Freedom," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 15 : Iss. 6 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol15/iss6/2 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PLURALISM AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM by Alan Geyer Dr. Alan Geyer (United Methodist) is Professor of Political Ethics and Ecumenics at Wesley Theological Seminary in Washington, DC; Resident Ethicist at Washington National Cathedral; and Senior Scholar of The Churches' Center for Theology and Public Policy. Many of his numerous scholarly writings dealt with East-West issues. This was a paper delivered at the Conference on "Christian Faith and Human Enmity" Kecskemét, Hungary, August 24, 1995. Any American invited to speak about the role of religion in the political conflicts of Europe must begin by acknowledging the intensity of religious and political conflicts within the United States. In many ways, our American constitutional tradition of separation of church and state that has been a vital guardian of religious liberty--yet its specific implications remain confused and are bitterly embattled at present.
    [Show full text]