DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Wednesday Volume 510 26 May 2010 No. 6 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 26 May 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 155 26 MAY 2010 Government Spending Cuts 156 cost reductions from the 70 major suppliers to government. House of Commons Some £600 million is being cut from the cost of quangos and at least £120 million will be saved through freezing Wednesday 26 May 2010 civil service recruitment. We will drive those and other savings through a new efficiency and reform group, The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock which will work with the Cabinet Office and draw on expertise within government. The shadow Chancellor PRAYERS will be pleased to learn that this will be funded from within existing budgets. This action is designed to send a shockwave through Departments to focus Ministers [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] and civil servants on whether spending in these areas is really a priority in the difficult times that we are now Government Spending Cuts facing. 11.33 am As well as reducing waste and the costs of government, we have started to scale back lower priority spending. Mr Alistair Darling (Edinburgh South West) (Lab) We have taken the tough decision to pass legislation to (Urgent Question): To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer end child trust fund payments—that will save £320 million if he will set out the measures that will be implemented in 2010-11, with the figure rising to £520 million in across government to deliver the more than £6 billion of 2011-12. The House will be pleased to learn that, as in-year spending cuts announced earlier this week? part of the net savings, we will be reinvesting money to The Chief Secretary to the Treasury (Mr David Laws): provide respite breaks for disabled children. Mr Speaker, I am extremely grateful, both to you and to Quangos across government will have to make major the shadow Chancellor, for this early opportunity to set savings in their budgets, and regional development agencies out to this House the action that this Government are will have to cut back on the spending that has the lowest taking to deal with the urgent economic situation and, economic impact. Finally, we have decided to allocate, frankly, the economic mess that we have inherited from out of these savings, £500 million this year to measures our predecessors. I refer to the House to the written to invest in improving the country’s growth potential ministerial statement that I laid in the House this morning, and building a fairer society: £150 million will be used which sets out the details of this early action. to help to deliver up to 50,000 adult apprenticeship The previous Government were borrowing at the rate starts; following the complete shambles of the colleges of an additional £3 billion per week—that is an capital programme under the previous Government, an unsustainable rate. Those huge public debts threaten additional £50 million will be allocated to help to fund financial stability and, if left unchecked, would derail capital investment in the further education colleges in the economic recovery. We need not look far across our greatest need; and we are allocating an additional own continent to see that action to tackle our budget £170 million to fund investment in social rented housing deficit is both urgent and necessary, and this is only the in 2010-11 to help to deliver 4,000 social housing starts— first step in a long road to restoring good management Members on both sides should welcome that. We will of our public finances. also freeze the backdated business rates payments under I set out in a written ministerial statement this morning the eight-year schedule of payments, including in respect the details of the spending cuts that we will make for of businesses in ports, until April 2011, and we will Departments in 2010-11. We have found cuts totalling consider any further action in this area and bring forward £6.243 billion—that is £243 million more than originally any plans before the freeze ends. targeted. However, the budgets for health, for international These are only the first steps that will be needed to development and for defence will not be reduced. In put our public finances back in shape, but I believe that addition, because we have been effective in finding the public and most Members of this House will welcome savings, we have been able to take the important decision the fact that we finally have a Government with the guts to protect the budgets for schools, Sure Start and 16 to and determination to take these difficult decisions. 19-year-olds in 2010-11, which I am sure Labour Members will welcome. Mr Darling: First, I am grateful to the Chief Secretary—I The devolved Administrations will have the option of am just sorry that the Chancellor of the Exchequer making their savings this year or deferring their share of could not make it. It is important, especially as the the savings until the next financial year, and they will Government have difficult decisions and announcements also receive their share of the additional spending that to make over the next few months, that the Chancellor has been agreed as part of this statement. We will help should be ready to come to this House to justify what he local government to deliver its savings by removing the is doing. Will the Chief Secretary accept that there is no ring fences around more than £1.7 billion of grants to good reason why the announcement made at a press local authorities in 2010-11. That is consistent with our conference on Monday could not have been made in a belief in giving more freedoms to local government. statement to the House, where it could be scrutinised by Our first priority has to be to cut waste; we cannot Members of the House? Will he undertake that, in expect difficult decisions to be taken on spending until future, announcements of this magnitude will be made we have eliminated the waste. We expect Departments in this House and not through a press briefing? to make savings, which will include £1.15 billion in Secondly, everyone knows that it is necessary for cutting discretionary areas, such as consultancy, travel countries across the world—ours included—to reduce and advertising costs. In addition, £1.7 billion will come the amount of borrowing but to do it in a way that does from delaying and stopping contracts and projects. not damage growth and that does not damage the That will include immediate negotiations to achieve economic fabric of this country. That is why I believe 157 Government Spending Cuts26 MAY 2010 Government Spending Cuts 158 [Mr Darling] that he took over the economic position and the Treasury at a difficult time and also had to deal with the difficult that to halve our deficit over a four-year-period was the circumstances of having a Prime Minister of the type right thing to do, because it would have enabled us to that the last Prime Minister was. I pay tribute to the secure the recovery, which is still fragile. Does the Chief work that he did. Secretary understand that although during the general I was very interested in the points that the shadow election campaign the Conservatives said that they would Chancellor made in response to my statement, but the not cut beyond eliminating what they called waste and only thing missing from all the questions that he asked inefficiency, they have gone far beyond that today? was any acknowledgment of what his colleague, the Does he not accept, too, that he campaigned explicitly former Chief Secretary, was able to acknowledge to me on a platform of not reducing expenditure this year? in the letter that he left on my desk—the former Will he tell the House how cutting 10,000 university Government left a situation in which there was no places can possibly amount to the elimination of waste money left. I say to the shadow Chancellor gently that and inefficiency? That is not being wasteful or inefficient; the only thing missing from his statement was a single that is cutting the investment that we will need to ensure serious proposal about how to deal with the huge that we have the skills in the future. financial deficit, with £156 billion-worth of borrowing Will the Chief Secretary also tell us where the and £3 billion-worth of borrowing each week. He is an Government said that they would cut the job prospects intelligent enough man to know that there are only for young people in particular? The future jobs fund three ways of tackling the structural deficit—we can cut meant that young people coming out of university had spending, cut welfare payments or raise taxes. There the prospect of getting work. Instead, tens of thousands was not a single clue in the statement that we just heard of young people will not have work and their first from him about how he would address those challenges. experience in working life will be of being on benefits, May I also respond to the shadow Chancellor’s point not of going into work.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Science Provision in English Universities: a Follow– Up
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Strategic Science Provision in English Universities: A Follow– up Second Report of Session 2005–06 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 April 2006 HC 1011 Published on 4 May 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £12.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Office of Science and Innovation and its associated public bodies. Current membership Mr Phil Willis MP (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Adam Afriyie MP (Conservative, Windsor) Mr Jim Devine MP (Labour, Livingston) Mr Robert Flello MP (Labour, Stoke-on-Trent South) Dr Evan Harris MP (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Margaret Moran MP (Labour, Luton South) Mr Brooks Newmark MP (Conservative, Braintree) Anne Snelgrove MP (Labour/Co-op, South Swindon) Bob Spink MP (Conservative, Castle Point) Dr Desmond Turner MP (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/s&tcom A list of Reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Information Bulletin
    Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard ..........................................................................................................1 • The Week Ahead..................................................................................................2 • Order of Oral Questions .......................................................................................3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 6 – 9 November 2007 .................................4 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements.............................................................................6 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 12 – 16 November 2007........7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 12 – 16 November 2007.............10 Editor: Nick Majer Legislation House of Commons Information Office Public Legislation London • Public Bills before Parliament 2007/08..............................................................12 SW1A 2TT • Bills - Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................14 • Public and General Acts 2007/08 .......................................................................15 TEL: 020 7219 4272 • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2006/07 Session ...............16 FAX: 020 7219 5839 [email protected] Private Legislation www.parliament.uk • Private Bills before Parliament 2007/08.............................................................18 Delegated Legislation To Contact the Editor: • Statutory Instruments .........................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Whitsun 2008 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT
    Whitsun 2008 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT Bioethics New Diseases Business Needs Scientists and Engineers Science in the Regions Chemical engineering tackles the 21st Century Gordian Knot Science in Parliament Vol 64 No 3 Summer 2007 The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee http://www.scienceinparliament.org.uk engineering TOMORROW Meet some of the leading researchers of today and tomorrow at the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council reception, sponsored by Mr Phil Willis MP. House of Commons Terrace Pavilion 7pm, 7th July 2008. For more information contact: [email protected] SCIENCE IN Science in Parliament has two main objectives: a) to inform the scientific and industrial communities PARLIAMENT of activities within Parliament of a scientific nature The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. and of the progress of relevant legislation; The Committee is an Associate Parliamentary Group b) to keep Members of Parliament abreast of members of both Houses of Parliament and British members of the European Parliament, representatives of scientific affairs. of scientific and technical institutions, industrial organisations and universities. We are preparing for the Second Reading debate in the HoC Contents of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. Whitsun 2008 Volume 65 Number 2 Unlike in the HoL, Opinion by Lord Krebs 2 the Government has conceded free votes Opinion by the Rt Hon John Denham MP 3 for Labour Members 100 Days as the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 4 on issues of Professor John Beddington conscience, which Science in the Home Office 6 are likely to be on admixed hybrid embryos, the need for a father and saviour siblings, as Professor Paul Wiles well as on any amendments to the Bill on Translation in Practice 8 abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 508 7 April 2010 No. 68 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 7 April 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 951 7 APRIL 2010 952 Mr. Adam Ingram (East Kilbride, Strathaven and House of Commons Lesmahagow) (Lab): When I was a Northern Ireland Minister, I organised an 11-city tour of the United Wednesday 7 April 2010 States to try to bring jobs and inward investment to Northern Ireland. Nationalists were involved in those The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock visits, but they did not try to sell the message of trying to take Northern Ireland out of the United Kingdom. PRAYERS Might I suggest to my hon. Friend that she should draw that to the attention of those separatist Scottish National party Ministers from the Scottish Parliament, who are [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] peddling separatism in the United States rather than trying to bring jobs to Scotland? BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS Ann McKechin: Yet again, my right hon. Friend gets BOURNEMOUTH BOROUGH COUNCIL BILL [LORDS] to the heart of the matter. Tartan week should be a Lords amendments considered and agreed to. showcase for increasing our exports to the USA and increasing tourism. Instead, the SNP has characterised MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL BILL [LORDS] it by its own obsession with independence and its gripes, Lords amendments considered and agreed to.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Tuesday Volume 660 14 May 2019 No. 300 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 14 May 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 69 14 MAY 2019 70 Tom Brake (Carshalton and Wallington) (LD): Is the House of Commons Secretary of State able to say anything about the security arrangements for those members of various Sri Lankan communities who have had to go into camps for their Tuesday 14 May 2019 own protection as a result of the attacks? The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr Hunt: If the right hon. Gentleman is talking about people with security concerns in this country, they should obviously talk to their local police force PRAYERS about their concerns. In terms of what we are doing in Sri Lanka, we have sent a team from the Metropolitan [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] police counter-terrorism command to help families affected by the atrocity, and we have also sent the Foreign Office’s rapid deployment team to help families who Oral Answers to Questions wish to cut short their holidays. Mr Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham, Perry Barr) (Lab): The unity we saw after the Easter Sunday bombings has FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE sadly been threatened by reprisal attacks against ordinary Sri Lankan Muslims and refugee communities from The Secretary of State was asked— Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Will the Secretary of State do everything possible to encourage the Sri Lankan Security Situation in Sri Lanka Government to provide those innocent people with the shelter and protection they need? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2006 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT
    Spring 2006 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT Complementary and Alternative Medicine The Precautionary Principle The Green Revolution SET Helping Africa 75th Anniversary of British Pharmacological Society The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee http://www.scienceinparliament.org.uk SCIENCE IN Science in Parliament has two main objectives: a) to inform the scientific and industrial communities PARLIAMENT of activities within Parliament of a scientific nature The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. and of the progress of relevant legislation; The Committee is an Associate Parliamentary Group b) to keep Members of Parliament abreast of members of both Houses of Parliament and British members of the European Parliament, representatives of scientific affairs. of scientific and technical institutions, industrial organisations and universities. Martin Rees notes the low participation in science by 16 and 17 year-olds and reductions in A-level physics, chemistry and maths. Deirdre Hutton presents a Science Contents Strategy for the Food Standards Agency. Mark Walport welcomes a vibrant research Spring 2006 Volume 63 Number 1 environment protected by risk management. Robert Souhami attacks the confused legal Keeping UK Science world class 1 and regulatory guidance that is stifling the Opinion by Lord Rees of Ludlow PRS use of electronic personal health care records Opinion by Dr Brian Iddon MP 2 in NHS research. Information for Health 2 Ursula Roos Opinion by Dr Mark Walport promotes UK- Taking a Risk 4 German bilateral
    [Show full text]
  • The Power Gap an Index of Everyday Power in Britain
    the power gap an index of everyday power in Britain DANIEL LEIGHTON Open access. Some rights reserved. As the publisher of this work, Demos wants to encourage the circulation of our work as widely as possible while retaining the copyright. We therefore have an open access policy which enables anyone to access our content online without charge. Anyone can download, save, perform or distribute this work in any format, including translation, without written permission. This is subject to the terms of the Demos licence found at the back of this publication. Its main conditions are: · Demos and the author(s) are credited · This summary and the address www.demos.co.uk are displayed · The text is not altered and is used in full · The work is not resold · A copy of the work or link to its use online is sent to Demos You are welcome to ask for permission to use this work for purposes other than those covered by the licence. Demos gratefully acknowledges the work of Creative Commons in inspiring our approach to copyright. To find out more go to www.creativecommons.org 2 contents Acknowledgements 4 Summary 5 Introduction 10 1 Defining power and powerlessness 14 2 Measuring power as capability 27 3 The Power Map 37 4 The power scores 42 5 Power Map constituency rankings 54 Appendix 65 Notes 73 References 76 3 acknowledgements There are a number of people and organisations that contributed to this research project and report. I would like to thank the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation for their generous generous funding of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the Widening Education Gap in Britain and How Where You Live Determines Your Chances
    LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the widening education gap in Britain and how where you live determines your chances Contents Executive summary Top and worse 20 for degrees National rank no qualification National rank degree London Major UK cities Executive summary Where you live will determine your chances of educational success and people living in traditionally underachieving areas are proportionately less likely to have a degree now than they were at the last election. LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION – the widening education gap in Britain and how where you live determines your chances report from the University and College Union (UCU) analyses educational achievement by Westminster parliamentary constituency in England, Scotland and Wales and ranks each according to the percentage of people with at least some qualifications and the percentage of people with a degree or above. Research has shown that the cost to the UK economy of educational underachievement is over £18 billion a year*. This report shows how access to education is divided up, using national league tables and an analysis of 21 of our biggest cities. It shows that where you live is a key determinant of whether you will gain qualifications. The result is a country of stark contrasts – a true postcode lottery for education. To take one example, two out of three people (60%) living in Nick Clegg’s Sheffield Hallam constituency have a degree and only 3% have no qualifications at all. However, just down the road in David Blunkett’s Sheffield Brightside constituency almost a quarter of people (23%) have no qualifications and just 15% have a degree.
    [Show full text]