DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:0809.5046V3 [Astro-Ph] 5 May 2009 Saevlcte Rmtecneso Vntelretgalax Largest the Even of Are Sinc Centers the 2008)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:0809.5046V3 [Astro-Ph] 5 May 2009 Saevlcte Rmtecneso Vntelretgalax Largest the Even of Are Sinc Centers the 2008) DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 26, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/22/09 HYPERCOMPACT STELLAR SYSTEMS AROUND RECOILING SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES DAVID MERRITT Center for Computational Relativity and Gravitation and Department of Physics, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA JEREMY D. SCHNITTMAN Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA S. KOMOSSA Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany Draft version November 26, 2018 Abstract A supermassive black hole ejected from the center of a galaxy by gravitational wave recoil carries a retinue of bound stars – a “hypercompact stellar system” (HCSS). The numbers and properties of HCSSs contain information about the merger histories of galaxies, the late evolution of binary black holes, and the distribution of gravitational-wave kicks. We relate the structural properties (size, mass, density profile) of HCSSs to the 7 properties of their host galaxies and to the size of the kick, in two regimes: collisional (MBH < 10 M ), i.e. 7 ⊙ short nuclear relaxation times; and collisionless (MBH > 10 M ), i.e. long nuclear relaxtion times.∼ HCSSs are expected to be similar in size and luminosity to globular∼ clusters⊙ but in extreme cases (large galaxies, kicks just above escape velocity) their stellar mass can approach that of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies. However they differ from all other classes of compact stellar system in having very high internal velocities. We show that the kick velocity is encoded in the velocity dispersion of the bound stars. Given a large enough sample of HCSSs, the distribution of gravitational-wave kicks can therefore be empirically determined. We combine a hierarchical merger algorithm with stellar population models to compute the rate of production of HCSSs over time and the probability of observing HCSSs in the local universe as a function of their apparent magnitude, color, size and velocity dispersion, under two different assumptions about the star formation history prior to the kick. We predict that 102 HCSSs should be detectable within 2 Mpc of the center of the Virgo cluster and that many of these should∼ be bright enough that their kick velocities (i.e. velocity dispersions) could be measured with reasonable exposure times. We discuss other strategies for detecting HCSSs and speculate on some exotic manifestations. Subject headings: 1. INTRODUCTION recoils large enough to displace SMBHs at least tem- A natural place to search for supermassive black holes porarily from galaxy cores – to distances of several (SMBHs) is at the centers of galaxies, where they pre- hundred to a few thousand parsecs – may be much more sumably are born and spend most of their lives. But common (Merrittet al. 2004; Madau and Quataert 2004; it has become increasingly clear that a SMBH can Gualandris & Merritt 2008; Komossa & Merritt 2008b). be violently separated from its birthplace as a result Komossa et al. (2008) reported the detection of a re- of linear momentum imparted by gravitational waves coil candidate. This quasar exhibits a kinematically off- arXiv:0809.5046v3 [astro-ph] 5 May 2009 1 during strong-field interactions with other SMBHs set broad-line region with a velocity of 2650 km s− , (Peres 1962; Bekenstein 1973; Redmount & Rees 1989). and very narrow, restframe, high-excitation emission lines The largest net recoils are produced from configurations which lack the usual ionization stratification – two key that bring the two holes close enough together to coa- signatures of kicks. In addition to spectroscopic sig- lesce. Kick velocities following coalescence can be as natures (Merritt et al. 2006b; Bonning et al. 2007), recoil- 1 ing SMBHs could be detected by their soft X-ray, UV high as 200 km s− in the case of nonspinning holes (González∼ et al. 2007a; Sopuerta et al. 2007); 4000 km and IR flaring (Shields & Bonning 2008; Lippai et al. 2008; Schnittman and Krolik 2008) resulting from shocks in the ac- s 1 for maximally spinning, equal mass BHs on∼ initially cir- − cretion disk surrounding the coalesced SMBH. Detection of cular orbits (Campanelli et al. 2007; González et al. 2007b; recoiling SMBHs in this way is contingent on the presence Herrmann et al. 2007; Pollney 2007; Tichy and Marronetti; of gas. But only a small fraction of nuclear SMBHs ex- Brügmann et al. 2008; Dain et al. 2008; Baker et al. 2008); hibit signatures associated with gas accretion, and a SMBH and even higher, 10,000 km s 1, for black holes that ∼ − that has been displaced from the center of its galaxy will approach on nearly-unboundorbits (Healy et al. 2008). Since only shine as a quasar until its bound gas has been used up escape velocities from the centers of even the largest galaxies 1 (Loeb 2007). The prospect that the SMBH will encounter and are < 2000 km s− (Merritt et al. 2004), it follows that the capture significant amounts of gas on its way out are small kicks∼ can in principle remove SMBHs completely from their (Kapoor 1976). host galaxies. While such extreme events may be relatively A SMBH ejected from the center of a galaxy will rare (e.g. Schnittman & Buonanno 2007; Schnittman 2007), 2 Merritt, Schnittman & Komossa always carry with it a retinue of bound stars. The be uniquely associated with them. In §8 we briefly discuss stars can reveal themselves via tidal disruption flares or the inverse problem of reconstructing the distribution of re- via accretion of gas from stellar winds onto the SMBH coil velocities from an observed sample of HCSSs. §9 sums (Komossa & Merritt 2008a, hereafter Paper I). The cluster of up and suggests topics for further investigation. stars is itself directly observable, and that is what we discuss 2. STRUCTURAL RELATIONS in the current work. The linear extent of such a cluster is fixed σ by the magnitude Vk of the kick velocity and by the mass of In what follows, we adopt the MBH relation in the form the SMBH: given by Ferrarese & Ford (2005): − 2 4.86 rk GMBH/Vk (1a) MBH σ ≡ 2 8 = 1.66 1 , (2) MBH V − 10 M 200 km s− 0.043 pc k . (1b) ⊙ 7 3 1 ≈ 10 M 10 km s− with σ the 1-D velocity dispersion of the galaxy bulge. The ⊙ Reasonable assumptions about the density of stars around influence radius of the SMBH is defined as the binary SMBH prior to the kick (Paper I) then imply a total GMBH rinfl (3a) luminosity of the bound population comparable to that of a ≡ σ2 globular star cluster. M σ 2 In this paper we discuss the properties of these “hyper- BH − 10.8pc 8 1 (3b) ≈ 10 M 200 km s− compact stellar systems” (HCSSs) and their relation to host ⊙ galaxy properties. Our emphasis is on the prospects for de- 2 and rk (σ/Vk) rinfl. tecting such objects in the nearby universe at optical wave- ≈ lengths, and so we focus on the properties that would distin- 2.1. Bound Population guish HCSSs from other stellar systems of comparable size As discussed in Paper I, a recoiling SMBH carries with it a or luminosity. As noted in Paper I, a key signature is their cloud of stars on bound orbits. Just prior to the kick, most of high internal velocity dispersion: because the gravitational the stars that will remain bound lie within a sphere of radius force that binds the cluster comes predominantly from the 6 6 9 rk around the SMBH (eq. 1). Setting MBH = 3 10 M SMBH, of mass 10 < MBH/M < 10 , stellar velocities will ∼ 1 3 × ⊙ ⊙ and Vk = 4000 km s gives rk 10 pc as an approximate, be much higher than∼ in ordinary∼ stellar systems of compara- − ≈ − ble luminosity. Other signatures include the small sizes of minimum expected value for the size of a HCSS; such a small HCSSs (unfortunately, too small to be resolved except for size justifies the adjective “hypercompact”. The largest values the most nearby objects); their high space velocities (due to of rk would probably be associated with HCSSs ejected from the most massive galaxies, containing SMBHs with masses the kick); and their broad-band colors, which should resem- 9 ble more closely the colors of galactic nuclei rather than the MBH 3 10 M and travelling with a velocity just above ≈ × ⊙ 1 colors of uniformly old and metal-poor systems like globular escape, 2000 km s− ; this implies rk several pc – similar clusters. to a large∼ globular cluster. ≈ Assuming a power law density profile before the kick, As we discuss in more detail below (§2), a remarkableprop- γ erty of HCSSs is that they encode, via their internal kinemat- ρ(r)= ρ(r0)(r/r0)− , the stellar mass Mk initially within ra- ics, the velocity of the kick that removed them from their host dius rk is galaxy. A measurement of the velocity dispersion of the stars π 4 ρ 3 in a HCSS is tantamount to a measurement of the amplitude Mk M(r rk)= γ (rk)rk (4a) of the kick – independent of how long ago the kick occurred; ≡ ≤ 3 − 3 γ the black hole mass; and the space velocity of the HCSS at 4π γ GMBH − = ρ0r , (4b) the moment of observation. This property of HCSSs opens 3 γ 0 V 2 the door to an empirical determination of the distribution of − k gravitational-wave kicks. where ρ0 ρ(r0). As a fiducial radius at which to normalize ≡ The outline of the paper is as follows. §2 derives the re- the pre-kick density profile, we take r0 = r , defined as the lations between the structural parameters of HCSSs– mass, radius containing an integrated mass in stars• equal to twice radius, and internal velocity dispersion – given assumed val- MBH.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Young Nearby Stars by Adam Conrad Schneider (Under The
    Young Nearby Stars by Adam Conrad Schneider (Under the Direction of Professor Inseok Song) Abstract Nearby young stars are without equal as stellar and planetary evolution laboratories. The aim of this work is to use age diagnostic considerations to execute a complete survey for new nearby young stars and to efficiently reevaluate and constrain their ages. Because of their proximity and age, young, nearby stars are the most desired targets for any astrophysical study focusing on the early stages of star and planet formation. Identifying nearby, young, low-mass stars is challenging because of their inherent faint- ness and age diagnostic degeneracies. A new method for identifying these objects has been developed, and a pilot study of its effectiveness is demonstrated by the identification of two definite new members of the TW Hydrae Association. Nearby, young, solar-type stars are initially identified in this work by their fractional X-ray luminosity. The results of a large-scale search for nearby, young, solar-type stars is presented. Follow-up spectroscopic observations are taken in order to measure various age diagnostics in order to accurately assess stellar ages. Age, one of the most fundamental properties of a star, is also one of the most difficult to determine. While a variety of proce- dures have been developed and utilized to approximate ages for solar-type stars, with varying degrees of success, a comprehensive age-dating technique has yet to be constructed. Often- times, different methods exhibit contradictory or conflicting findings. Such inconsistencies demonstrate the value of a uniform method of determining stellar ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawking Radiation
    a brief history of andreas müller student seminar theory group max camenzind lsw heidelberg mpia & lsw january 2004 http://www.lsw.uni-heidelberg.de/users/amueller talktalk organisationorganisation basics ☺ standard knowledge advanced knowledge edge of knowledge and verifiability mindmind mapmap whatwhat isis aa blackblack hole?hole? black escape velocity c hole singularity in space-time notion „black hole“ from relativist john archibald wheeler (1968), but first speculation from geologist and astronomer john michell (1783) ☺ blackblack holesholes inin relativityrelativity solutions of the vacuum field equations of einsteins general relativity (1915) Gµν = 0 some history: schwarzschild 1916 (static, neutral) reissner-nordstrøm 1918 (static, electrically charged) kerr 1963 (rotating, neutral) kerr-newman 1965 (rotating, charged) all are petrov type-d space-times plug-in metric gµν to verify solution ;-) ☺ black hole mass hidden in (point or ring) singularity blackblack holesholes havehave nono hairhair!! schwarzschild {M} reissner-nordstrom {M,Q} kerr {M,a} kerr-newman {M,a,Q} wheeler: no-hair theorem ☺ blackblack holesholes –– schwarzschildschwarzschild vs.vs. kerrkerr ☺ blackblack holesholes –– kerrkerr inin boyerboyer--lindquistlindquist black hole mass M spin parameter a lapse function delta potential generalized radius sigma potential frame-dragging frequency cylindrical radius blackblack holehole topologytopology blackblack holehole –– characteristiccharacteristic radiiradii G = M = c = 1 blackblack holehole --
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxies – AS 3011
    Galaxies – AS 3011 Simon Driver [email protected] ... room 308 This is a Junior Honours 18-lecture course Lectures 11am Wednesday & Friday Recommended book: The Structure and Evolution of Galaxies by Steven Phillipps Galaxies – AS 3011 1 Aims • To understand: – What is a galaxy – The different kinds of galaxy – The optical properties of galaxies – The hidden properties of galaxies such as dark matter, presence of black holes, etc. – Galaxy formation concepts and large scale structure • Appreciate: – Why galaxies are interesting, as building blocks of the Universe… and how simple calculations can be used to better understand these systems. Galaxies – AS 3011 2 1 from 1st year course: • AS 1001 covered the basics of : – distances, masses, types etc. of galaxies – spectra and hence dynamics – exotic things in galaxies: dark matter and black holes – galaxies on a cosmological scale – the Big Bang • in AS 3011 we will study dynamics in more depth, look at other non-stellar components of galaxies, and introduce high-redshift galaxies and the large-scale structure of the Universe Galaxies – AS 3011 3 Outline of lectures 1) galaxies as external objects 13) large-scale structure 2) types of galaxy 14) luminosity of the Universe 3) our Galaxy (components) 15) primordial galaxies 4) stellar populations 16) active galaxies 5) orbits of stars 17) anomalies & enigmas 6) stellar distribution – ellipticals 18) revision & exam advice 7) stellar distribution – spirals 8) dynamics of ellipticals plus 3-4 tutorials 9) dynamics of spirals (questions set after
    [Show full text]
  • Apparent and Absolute Magnitudes of Stars: a Simple Formula
    Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com WSN 96 (2018) 120-133 EISSN 2392-2192 Apparent and Absolute Magnitudes of Stars: A Simple Formula Dulli Chandra Agrawal Department of Farm Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221005, India E-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT An empirical formula for estimating the apparent and absolute magnitudes of stars in terms of the parameters radius, distance and temperature is proposed for the first time for the benefit of the students. This reproduces successfully not only the magnitudes of solo stars having spherical shape and uniform photosphere temperature but the corresponding Hertzsprung-Russell plot demonstrates the main sequence, giants, super-giants and white dwarf classification also. Keywords: Stars, apparent magnitude, absolute magnitude, empirical formula, Hertzsprung-Russell diagram 1. INTRODUCTION The visible brightness of a star is expressed in terms of its apparent magnitude [1] as well as absolute magnitude [2]; the absolute magnitude is in fact the apparent magnitude while it is observed from a distance of . The apparent magnitude of a celestial object having flux in the visible band is expressed as [1, 3, 4] ( ) (1) ( Received 14 March 2018; Accepted 31 March 2018; Date of Publication 01 April 2018 ) World Scientific News 96 (2018) 120-133 Here is the reference luminous flux per unit area in the same band such as that of star Vega having apparent magnitude almost zero. Here the flux is the magnitude of starlight the Earth intercepts in a direction normal to the incidence over an area of one square meter. The condition that the Earth intercepts in the direction normal to the incidence is normally fulfilled for stars which are far away from the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Spectroscopy of Variable Stars
    Spectroscopy of Variable Stars Steve B. Howell and Travis A. Rector The National Optical Astronomy Observatory 950 N. Cherry Ave. Tucson, AZ 85719 USA Introduction A Note from the Authors The goal of this project is to determine the physical characteristics of variable stars (e.g., temperature, radius and luminosity) by analyzing spectra and photometric observations that span several years. The project was originally developed as a The 2.1-meter telescope and research project for teachers participating in the NOAO TLRBSE program. Coudé Feed spectrograph at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Ari- Please note that it is assumed that the instructor and students are familiar with the zona. The 2.1-meter telescope is concepts of photometry and spectroscopy as it is used in astronomy, as well as inside the white dome. The Coudé stellar classification and stellar evolution. This document is an incomplete source Feed spectrograph is in the right of information on these topics, so further study is encouraged. In particular, the half of the building. It also uses “Stellar Spectroscopy” document will be useful for learning how to analyze the the white tower on the right. spectrum of a star. Prerequisites To be able to do this research project, students should have a basic understanding of the following concepts: • Spectroscopy and photometry in astronomy • Stellar evolution • Stellar classification • Inverse-square law and Stefan’s law The control room for the Coudé Description of the Data Feed spectrograph. The spec- trograph is operated by the two The spectra used in this project were obtained with the Coudé Feed telescopes computers on the left.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Deficits, Stalling Radii, and the Merger Histories of Elliptical Galaxies David Merritt Rochester Institute of Technology
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Articles 5-22-2006 Mass Deficits, Stalling Radii, and the Merger Histories of Elliptical Galaxies David Merritt Rochester Institute of Technology Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/article Recommended Citation David Merritt 2006 ApJ 648 976 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DRAFT VERSION FEBRUARY 5, 2008 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 MASS DEFICITS, STALLING RADII, AND THE MERGER HISTORIES OF ELLIPTICAL GALAXIES DAVID MERRITT Department of Physics, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623 Draft version February 5, 2008 Abstract A binary supermassive black hole leaves an imprint on a galactic nucleus in the form of a “mass deficit,” a decrease in the mass of the nucleus due to ejection of stars by the binary. The magnitude of the mass deficit is in principle related to the galaxy’s merger history, but the relation has never been quantified. Here, high- accuracy N-body simulations are used to calibrate this relation. Mass deficits are shown to be Mde f ≈ 0.5M12, with M12 the total mass of the binary; the coefficient in this relation depends only weakly on M2/M1 or on the galaxy’s pre-existing density profile. Hence, after N mergers, Mde f ≈ 0.5N M• with M• the final (current) black hole mass. When compared with observed mass deficits, this result implies 1 ∼< N ∼< 3, in accord with hierarchical galaxy formation models.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia Data Release 2 Special Issue
    A&A 623, A110 (2019) Astronomy https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833304 & © ESO 2019 Astrophysics Gaia Data Release 2 Special issue Gaia Data Release 2 Variable stars in the colour-absolute magnitude diagram?,?? Gaia Collaboration, L. Eyer1, L. Rimoldini2, M. Audard1, R. I. Anderson3,1, K. Nienartowicz2, F. Glass1, O. Marchal4, M. Grenon1, N. Mowlavi1, B. Holl1, G. Clementini5, C. Aerts6,7, T. Mazeh8, D. W. Evans9, L. Szabados10, A. G. A. Brown11, A. Vallenari12, T. Prusti13, J. H. J. de Bruijne13, C. Babusiaux4,14, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones15, M. Biermann16, F. Jansen17, C. Jordi18, S. A. Klioner19, U. Lammers20, L. Lindegren21, X. Luri18, F. Mignard22, C. Panem23, D. Pourbaix24,25, S. Randich26, P. Sartoretti4, H. I. Siddiqui27, C. Soubiran28, F. van Leeuwen9, N. A. Walton9, F. Arenou4, U. Bastian16, M. Cropper29, R. Drimmel30, D. Katz4, M. G. Lattanzi30, J. Bakker20, C. Cacciari5, J. Castañeda18, L. Chaoul23, N. Cheek31, F. De Angeli9, C. Fabricius18, R. Guerra20, E. Masana18, R. Messineo32, P. Panuzzo4, J. Portell18, M. Riello9, G. M. Seabroke29, P. Tanga22, F. Thévenin22, G. Gracia-Abril33,16, G. Comoretto27, M. Garcia-Reinaldos20, D. Teyssier27, M. Altmann16,34, R. Andrae15, I. Bellas-Velidis35, K. Benson29, J. Berthier36, R. Blomme37, P. Burgess9, G. Busso9, B. Carry22,36, A. Cellino30, M. Clotet18, O. Creevey22, M. Davidson38, J. De Ridder6, L. Delchambre39, A. Dell’Oro26, C. Ducourant28, J. Fernández-Hernández40, M. Fouesneau15, Y. Frémat37, L. Galluccio22, M. García-Torres41, J. González-Núñez31,42, J. J. González-Vidal18, E. Gosset39,25, L. P. Guy2,43, J.-L. Halbwachs44, N. C. Hambly38, D.
    [Show full text]
  • PHAS 1102 Physics of the Universe 3 – Magnitudes and Distances
    PHAS 1102 Physics of the Universe 3 – Magnitudes and distances Brightness of Stars • Luminosity – amount of energy emitted per second – not the same as how much we observe! • We observe a star’s apparent brightness – Depends on: • luminosity • distance – Brightness decreases as 1/r2 (as distance r increases) • other dimming effects – dust between us & star Defining magnitudes (1) Thus Pogson formalised the magnitude scale for brightness. This is the brightness that a star appears to have on the sky, thus it is referred to as apparent magnitude. Also – this is the brightness as it appears in our eyes. Our eyes have their own response to light, i.e. they act as a kind of filter, sensitive over a certain wavelength range. This filter is called the visual band and is centred on ~5500 Angstroms. Thus these are apparent visual magnitudes, mv Related to flux, i.e. energy received per unit area per unit time Defining magnitudes (2) For example, if star A has mv=1 and star B has mv=6, then 5 mV(B)-mV(A)=5 and their flux ratio fA/fB = 100 = 2.512 100 = 2.512mv(B)-mv(A) where !mV=1 corresponds to a flux ratio of 1001/5 = 2.512 1 flux(arbitrary units) 1 6 apparent visual magnitude, mv From flux to magnitude So if you know the magnitudes of two stars, you can calculate mv(B)-mv(A) the ratio of their fluxes using fA/fB = 2.512 Conversely, if you know their flux ratio, you can calculate the difference in magnitudes since: 2.512 = 1001/5 log (f /f ) = [m (B)-m (A)] log 2.512 10 A B V V 10 = 102/5 = 101/2.5 mV(B)-mV(A) = !mV = 2.5 log10(fA/fB) To calculate a star’s apparent visual magnitude itself, you need to know the flux for an object at mV=0, then: mS - 0 = mS = 2.5 log10(f0) - 2.5 log10(fS) => mS = - 2.5 log10(fS) + C where C is a constant (‘zero-point’), i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Age Dating the Galactic Bar with the Nuclear Stellar Disc
    MNRAS 492, 4500–4511 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa140 Advance Access publication 2020 January 20 Age dating the Galactic bar with the nuclear stellar disc Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-abstract/492/3/4500/5709929 by Institute of Child Health/University College London user on 14 February 2020 Junichi Baba1‹ and Daisuke Kawata 2 1National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 2Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 6NT, UK Accepted 2020 January 11. Received 2019 December 26; in original form 2019 September 16 ABSTRACT From the decades of the theoretical studies, it is well known that the formation of the bar triggers the gas funnelling into the central sub-kpc region and leads to the formation of a kinematically cold nuclear stellar disc (NSD). We demonstrate that this mechanism can be used to identify the formation epoch of the Galactic bar, using an N-body/hydrodynamics simulation of an isolated Milky Way–like galaxy. As shown in many previous literature, our simulation shows that the bar formation triggers an intense star formation for ∼1 Gyr in the central region and forms an NSD. As a result, the oldest age limit of the NSD is relatively sharp, and the oldest population becomes similar to the age of the bar. Therefore, the age distribution of the NSD tells us the formation epoch of the bar. We discuss that a major challenge in measuring the age distribution of the NSD in the Milky Way is contamination from other non-negligible stellar components in the central region, such as a classical bulge component.
    [Show full text]
  • Ages of Young Stars
    Ages of Young Stars David R. Soderblom Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore MD USA Lynne A. Hillenbrand Caltech, Pasadena CA USA Rob. D. Jeffries Astrophysics Group, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK Eric E. Mamajek Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester NY, 14627-0171, USA Tim Naylor School of Physics, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QL, UK Determining the sequence of events in the formation of stars and planetary systems and their time-scales is essential for understanding those processes, yet establishing ages is fundamentally difficult because we lack direct indicators. In this review we discuss the age challenge for young stars, specifically those less than ∼100 Myr old. Most age determination methods that we discuss are primarily applicable to groups of stars but can be used to estimate the age of individual objects. A reliable age scale is established above 20 Myr from measurement of the Lithium Depletion Boundary (LDB) in young clusters, and consistency is shown between these ages and those from the upper main sequence and the main sequence turn-off – if modest core convection and rotation is included in the models of higher-mass stars. Other available methods for age estimation include the kinematics of young groups, placing stars in Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams, pulsations and seismology, surface gravity measurement, rotation and activity, and lithium abundance. We review each of these methods and present known strengths and weaknesses. Below ∼ 20 Myr, both model-dependent and observational uncertainties grow, the situation is confused by the possibility of age spreads, and no reliable absolute ages yet exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Massive Objects: the Stellar Nuclei – Black Hole Connection
    Astronomical News Report on the ESO Workshop Central Massive Objects: The Stellar Nuclei – Black Hole Connection held at ESO Garching, Germany, 22–25 June 2010 Nadine Neumayer1 Eric Emsellem1 1 ESO An overview of the ESO workshop on black holes and nuclear star clusters is presented. The meeting reviewed the status of our observational and the- oretical understanding of central mas- sive objects, as well as the search for intermediate mass black holes in globu- lar clusters. There will be no published proceedings, but presentations are available at http://www.eso.org/sci/ meetings/cmo2010/program.html. This workshop brought together a broad international audience in the combined fields of galaxy nuclei, nuclear star clus­ ters and supermassive black holes, to confront state­of­the art observations with cutting­edge models. Around a hundred participants from Europe, North and South America, as well as East Asia and Figure 1. Workshop participants assembled outside made up of several populations of stars. Australia gathered for a three­day meet­ ESO Headquarters in Garching. The existence of very young O and WR ing held at ESO Headquarters in Garching, stars in the central few arcseconds Germany (see Figure 1). The sessions around the black hole is puzzling. The were of very high quality, with many very – Are intermediate mass black holes currently favoured solution to this paradox lively, interesting and fruitful discussions. formed in nuclear clusters/globular of youth is in situ star formation in infalling All talks can be found online on the web clusters? gas clouds. This view is also supported page of the workshop1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stellar Mass Function in the Field
    Professor David Carter (PI) Liverpool John Moores University UK Dr Habib G. Khosroshahi Liverpool John Moores University UK Mr Mustapha Mouhcine Liverpool John Moores University UK Ms Susan M. Percival Liverpool John Moores University UK Dr Harry C. Ferguson (USA PI) Space Telescope Science Institute USA/MD Dr Paul Goudfrooij Space Telescope Science Institute USA/MD Dr Terry Bridges Queen's University Canada Dr Thomas H. Puzia Dominion Astrophysical Observatory Canada Dr Carlos del Burgo Dublin Institute For Advanced Studies Ireland Dr Bryan Miller Gemini Observatory, Southern Operations Chile Dr Bianca Poggianti INAF - Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova Italy Dr Alfonso Aguerri Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias Spain Dr Marc Balcells Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias Spain Mr Derek Hammer Johns Hopkins University USA/MD Dr Reynier F. Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Netherlands Prof. Edwin Valentijn Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Netherlands Dr Gijs Verdoes Kleijn Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Netherlands Dr Peter Erwin Max-Planck-Insitute for Extraterrestrial Physics Germany Dr Ann Hornschemeier NASA Goddard Space Flight Center USA/MD Dr Yutaka Komiyama National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Japan Dr Masafumi Yagi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan Japan Dr Jennifer Lotz National Optical Astronomy Observatories, AURA USA/AZ National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Dr Neal A. Miller USA/VA and Johns Hopkins University Dr Eric W. Peng Peking University China Dr Dan Batcheldor Rochester Institute of Technology USA/NY Prof. David Merritt Rochester Institute of Technology USA/NY Dr Ronald O. Marzke San Francisco State University USA/CA Dr Alister W. Graham Swinburne University of Technology Australia Dr Helmut Jerjen The Australian National University Australia Dr Avon P.
    [Show full text]