DOCSLIB.ORG

T.C. Harran Ünġversġtesġ Fen Bġlġmlerġ Enstġtüsü

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T.C. Harran Ünġversġtesġ Fen Bġlġmlerġ Enstġtüsü T.C. HARRAN ÜNĠVERSĠTESĠ FEN BĠLĠMLERĠ ENSTĠTÜSÜ YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ ġANLIURFA YÖRESĠNDE DOĞAL YAYILIġ GÖSTEREN ARACEAE JUSS. FAMĠLYASINA AĠT TAKSONLARIN ANATOMĠK VE MORFOLOJĠK YÖNDEN ĠNCELENMESĠ Cahit ÇEÇEN BĠYOLOJĠ ANABĠLĠM DALI ġANLIURFA 2018 Prof. Dr. Hasan AKAN danıĢmanlığında, Cahit ÇEÇEN‟ in hazırladığı “ġanlıurfa Yöresinde Doğal YayılıĢ Gösteren Araceae Juss. Familyasına Ait Taksonların Anatomik ve Morfolojik Yönden Ġncelenmesi” konulu bu çalıĢma 19/07/2018 tarihinde aĢağıdaki jüri tarafından oy birliği ile Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı‟nda YÜKSEK LĠSANS TEZĠ olarak kabul edilmiĢtir. Ġmza DanıĢman : Prof. Dr. Hasan AKAN …………………………………... Üye : Doç. Dr. Selami SELVĠ …………………………………... Üye : Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Göksal SEZEN …………………………………... Bu Tezin Biyoloji Anabilim Dalında Yapıldığını ve Enstitümüz Kurallarına Göre Düzenlendiğini Onaylarım. Prof. Dr. Halil Murat ALĞIN Enstitü Müdürü Bu çalıĢma HÜBAK Tarafından DesteklenmiĢtir. Proje No: 17173 Not: Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve baĢka kaynaktan yapılan bildiriĢlerin, çizelge, Ģekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. ĠÇĠNDEKĠLER Sayfa No ÖZET ............................................................................................................................................ i ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. ii TEġEKKÜR .................................................................................................................................. iii ġEKĠLLER DĠZĠNĠ ....................................................................................................................... iv ÇĠZELGELER DĠZĠNĠ ................................................................................................................. v SĠMGELER DĠZĠNĠ ...................................................................................................................... vi 1. GĠRĠġ ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. ÖNCEKĠ ÇALIġMALAR ......................................................................................................... 5 3. MATERYAL ve YÖNTEM ...................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Morfolojik Yöntem ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Anatomik Yöntem ............................................................................................................. 9 3.2.1 Örneklerin Tespiti ....................................................................................................... 10 3.2.2. Yıkama....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.3. Gömme ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.4. Gömme iĢlemi hazırlıkları ......................................................................................... 11 3.2.5. Kesit alma .................................................................................................................. 11 3.2.6. Parafinden kurtarma ................................................................................................... 12 3.2.7 Boyama ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.7.1 Safranin çözeltisi hazırlama ................................................................................ 12 3.2.7.2 Fast -Green çözeltisi hazırlama ........................................................................... 13 3.2.7.3 Safranin -Fast Green boyama iĢlemleri ............................................................... 13 3.2.8 Kurutma ...................................................................................................................... 13 4. ARAġTIRMA BULGULARI ve TARTIġMA ......................................................................... 14 4.1. AraĢtırma Alanının Coğrafik Durumu ............................................................................... 14 4.2. Araceae (yılanyasıtığıgiller) familyasının genel özellikleri ............................................... 15 4 2. 1. Arum, Biarum ve Eminium cinslerinin genel özellikleri ve yayılıĢları .......................... 17 4.3. Arum, Biarum ve Eminium türlerinin morfolojik özellikleri ............................................. 21 4.3.1. Arum rupicola Boiss. (ġekil 4.6.) .............................................................................. 21 4.3.2. Arum dioscoridis Sm. (ġekil 4.7) ............................................................................... 24 4.3.3. Biarum aleppicum J.Thiébaut (ġekil 4.8.) ................................................................. 26 4.3.4. Biarum bovei Blume (ġekil 4.9.) ............................................................................... 29 4.3.5. Biarum carduchorum (Schott) Engler (ġekil 4.10.) ................................................... 31 4.3.6. Eminium intortum (Banks & Sol.) Kuntze (ġekil 4.11.) ............................................ 33 4.3.7. Eminium rauwolffii (Blume) Schott (ġekil 4.12.) ...................................................... 35 4.3.8 Eminium spiculatum (Blume) Schott (ġekil 4.13.) ..................................................... 38 4.2. Araceae familyasına ait türlerin anatomisi ........................................................................ 40 4.2.1. Arum dioscoridis anatomisi ....................................................................................... 40 4.2.1.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 40 4.2.1.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 42 4.2.1.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 44 4.2.2. Arum rupicola anatomisi ........................................................................................... 47 4.2.2.1. Kök anatomisi: ................................................................................................... 47 4.2.2.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 49 4.2.2.3. Yaprak anatomisi: .............................................................................................. 51 4.2.3. Biarum aleppicum anatomisi ..................................................................................... 54 4.2.3.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 54 4.2.3.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 56 4.2.3.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 58 4.2.4. Biarum bovei anatomisi ............................................................................................. 61 4.2.4.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 61 4.2.4.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 63 4.2.4.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 65 4.2.5. Biarum carduchorum anatomisi ................................................................................ 68 4.2.5.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 68 4.2.5.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 70 4.2.5.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 72 4.2.6. Eminium intortum anatomisi ...................................................................................... 75 4.2.6.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 75 4.2.6.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 77 4.2.6.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 79 4.2.7. Eminium rauwolffii anatomisi .................................................................................... 82 4.2.7.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 82 4.2.7.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................. 84 4.2.7.3. Yaprak anatomisi ............................................................................................... 86 4.2.8. Eminium spiculatum anatomisi .................................................................................. 89 4.2.8.1. Kök anatomisi .................................................................................................... 89 4.2.8.2. Skapa anatomisi ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Ten Varieties and Five Subspecies of Crocus Baalbekensis K. Addam & M
    MOJ Ecology & Environmental Sciences Research Article Open Access New ten varieties and five subspecies of Crocus baalbekensis K. Addam & M. Bou-Hamdan (Iridaceae) endemic to Lebanon added to the Lebanese flora Abstract Volume 4 Issue 6 - 2019 Fifteen new world record Crocus baalbekensis var. decorus, fluctus, flavo-album, 1 2 makniensis, youninensis, rasbaalbekensis, rihaensis, shaathensis, shlifensis, tnaiyetensis, Khodr Addam, Mounir Bou-Hamdan, Jihad subsp. ahlansis, anthopotamus, fakihansis, harbatansis, and rassomensis, joined the Takkoush,3 Kamal Hout4 Lebanese flora and particularly the Iridaceae family. They were found in Baalbek-Hermel 1Head, Integrative and Environmental Research Center, AUL from North Baalbek to Hermel. All of them display C. Baalbekensis but vary in many Beirut, Lebanon 2 taxonomic details. The validation for the existence of these new Varieties and Subspecies Integrative Research and Environmental Center, AUL Beirut, were verified by illustrated morphologic descriptions and observations were based on fresh Lebanon 3 materials. More than twenty years of fieldwork and three years of observation, phenology, Business Research Center, AUL Beirut, Lebanon 4Department of PG Studies & Scientific Research, Global and exploration of a host of locations, numerous quantities were found varying mostly from University Beirut, Lebanon ten to more of the new species. Voucher specimens of the plants (Holotypes) were deposited in K. Addam’s Herbarium at Arts, Sciences and Technology University in Lebanon. Correspondence: Dr. Khodr H Addam, Head, Integrative and The goal of this study was to display a comparative account on the anatomical and ecological Environmental Research Center, AUL, Beirut, Lebanon, Tel 03- characters of the 10 varieties and 5 subspecies of Crocus baalbekensis taxa as well as 204930, Email highlight the taxonomical importance of their corm, corm tunic, leaves, measurements, and Received: November 19, 2019 | Published: December 05, comparisons of other structural anatomical differences and similarities.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Specifics and Chemical Composition of Medicinal Plant Eminium Regelii Vved
    Global Journal of Pharmacology 8 (3): 432-436, 2014 ISSN 1992-0075 © IDOSI Publications, 2014 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.gjp.2014.8.3.83325 Biological Specifics and Chemical Composition of Medicinal Plant Eminium regelii Vved Batiyash Mukanovna Silybayeva, Kulyash Askarovna Tazabayeva and Klara Sauykovna Zharykbasova Kazakh Humanitarian Juridical Innovative University, Abai Street, 94, Semey City, East Kazakhstan Region, 071400 Republic of Kazakhstan Abstract: The aim of the present work was to study areal of Eminium regelii Vved in Kazakhstan territory, its biological specifics and chemical composition. Eminium regelii Vved was discovered on the territory of Kazakhstan national reserve Aksu-Zhabagly. Distinctive biological characteristic of Eminium regelii is a wedge-shaped base of a leaf that smoothly turns into petiole. Leaf base of Eminium lehmannii is heart-shaped or obtuse-angled. Specific weight of aluminium is the greatest of all 21 elements contained in over-ground and underground parts of plant. Leaves contain 24% of aluminium and tubers contain 66% of aluminuim of all amount if mineral elements. Two flavonoids are discovered in Eminium regelii: luteolin and quercetin. Key words: Eminium regelii Aksu-Zhabagly Mineral Elements Luteolin Quercetin INTRODUCTION Literature about Eminium regelii Vved that is the second specie of Eminium genus growing in Kazakhstan Perennial herbaceous plant Eminium regelii Vved territory are scanty. According to Pavlov N.V., Gegelii belongs to genus Eminium family Aracea. grows in foothills and bottom flange of mountain regions Genus Eminium consists of about 9 species of plants [2]. growing on the territory from South Africa to Central The aim of the present work is to inspect areal of Asia: E.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Management of Biodiversity in Slatioara Gravel Pit”
    FINAL REPORT OF THE PROJECT ”INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF BIODIVERSITY IN SLATIOARA GRAVEL PIT” ”The Quarry Life Award” Scientific and Educational Contest, 4th edition (2018) 0 1. Contestant profile Contestant name: Marcel ȚÎBÎRNAC Contestant occupation: Ecologist expert University / Organisation Independent candidate – freelancer Number of people in your team: 3 2. Project overview Title: Integrated management of biodiversity in Slatioara gravel pit Contest: (Research/Community) Research Quarry name: Slatioara Pit 3. Abstract The project „Integrated management of biodiversity in Slatioara gravel pit” is based on 3 incorporated approaches: i) inventory, mapping and detailed evaluation of habitats and species of wild flora and fauna, ii) identification of proper solutions for the ecological restoration and rehabilitation of the site (insurring the conditions for the quality improvement of biodiversity aspects) and iii) promoting suitable ethics for a proper/sustainable management of the exploitation of natural resources that would lead to a strong sustainable development at a local and regional level. In this context, the project entailed the study of biodiversity (habitats, plants, invertebrates, amphibians, reptiles, fish, birds and mammals) and the pressure/threats existing/developing on these biodiversity groups, as well as the study of degrated habitats with high ecological potential for the biodiversity elements within Slatioara gravel pit (feeding, reproduction and rest habitats for fauna species). The project also includes solutions
    [Show full text]
  • History and Current Status of Systematic Research with Araceae
    HISTORY AND CURRENT STATUS OF SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH WITH ARACEAE Thomas B. Croat Missouri Botanical Garden P. O. Box 299 St. Louis, MO 63166 U.S.A. Note: This paper, originally published in Aroideana Vol. 21, pp. 26–145 in 1998, is periodically updated onto the IAS web page with current additions. Any mistakes, proposed changes, or new publications that deal with the systematics of Araceae should be brought to my attention. Mail to me at the address listed above, or e-mail me at [email protected]. Last revised November 2004 INTRODUCTION The history of systematic work with Araceae has been previously covered by Nicolson (1987b), and was the subject of a chapter in the Genera of Araceae by Mayo, Bogner & Boyce (1997) and in Curtis's Botanical Magazine new series (Mayo et al., 1995). In addition to covering many of the principal players in the field of aroid research, Nicolson's paper dealt with the evolution of family concepts and gave a comparison of the then current modern systems of classification. The papers by Mayo, Bogner and Boyce were more comprehensive in scope than that of Nicolson, but still did not cover in great detail many of the participants in Araceae research. In contrast, this paper will cover all systematic and floristic work that deals with Araceae, which is known to me. It will not, in general, deal with agronomic papers on Araceae such as the rich literature on taro and its cultivation, nor will it deal with smaller papers of a technical nature or those dealing with pollination biology.
    [Show full text]
  • FL4113 Layout 1
    Fl. Medit. 23: 255-291 doi: 10.7320/FlMedit23.255 Version of Record published online on 30 December 2013 Mediterranean chromosome number reports – 23 edited by G. Kamari, C. Blanché & S. Siljak-Yakovlev Abstract Kamari, G., Blanché, C. & Siljak-Yakovlev, S. (eds): Mediterranean chromosome number reports – 23. — Fl. Medit. 23: 255-291. 2013. — ISSN: 1120-4052 printed, 2240-4538 online. This is the twenty-three of a series of reports of chromosomes numbers from Mediterranean area, peri-Alpine communities and the Atlantic Islands, in English or French language. It com- prises contributions on 56 taxa: Anthriscus, Bupleurum, Dichoropetalum, Eryngium, Ferula, Ferulago, Lagoecia, Oenanthe, Prangos, Scaligeria, Seseli and Torilis from Turkey by Ju. V. Shner, T. V. Alexeeva, M. G. Pimenov & E. V. Kljuykov (Nos 1768-1783); Astrantia, Bupleurum, Daucus, Dichoropetalum, Eryngium, Heracleum, Laserpitium, Melanoselinum, Oreoselinum, Pimpinella, Pteroselinum and Ridolfia from Former Jugoslavia (Slovenia), Morocco and Portugal by J. Shner & M. Pimenov (1784-1798); Arum, Biarum and Eminium from Turkey by E. Akalın, S. Demirci & E. Kaya (1799-1804); Colchicum from Turkey by G. E. Genç, N. Özhatay & E. Kaya (1805-1808); Crocus and Galanthus from Turkey by S. Yüzbaşıoğlu, S. Demirci & E. Kaya (1809-1812); Pilosella from Italy by E. Di Gristina, G. Domina & A. Geraci (1813-1814); Narcissus from Sicily by A. Troia, A. M. Orlando & R. M. Baldini (1815-1816); Allium, Cerastium, Cochicum, Fritillaria, Narcissus and Thymus from Greece, Kepfallinia by S. Samaropoulou, P. Bareka & G. Kamari (1817-1823). Addresses of the editors: Prof. Emer. Georgia Kamari, Botanical Institute, Section of Plant Biology, Department of Biology, University of Patras, GR-265 00 Patras, Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Threats to Australia's Grazing Industries by Garden
    final report Project Code: NBP.357 Prepared by: Jenny Barker, Rod Randall,Tony Grice Co-operative Research Centre for Australian Weed Management Date published: May 2006 ISBN: 1 74036 781 2 PUBLISHED BY Meat and Livestock Australia Limited Locked Bag 991 NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2059 Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Meat & Livestock Australia acknowledges the matching funds provided by the Australian Government to support the research and development detailed in this publication. This publication is published by Meat & Livestock Australia Limited ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA). Care is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication. However MLA cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions contained in the publication. You should make your own enquiries before making decisions concerning your interests. Reproduction in whole or in part of this publication is prohibited without prior written consent of MLA. Weeds of the future? Threats to Australia’s grazing industries by garden plants Abstract This report identifies 281 introduced garden plants and 800 lower priority species that present a significant risk to Australia’s grazing industries should they naturalise. Of the 281 species: • Nearly all have been recorded overseas as agricultural or environmental weeds (or both); • More than one tenth (11%) have been recorded as noxious weeds overseas; • At least one third (33%) are toxic and may harm or even kill livestock; • Almost all have been commercially available in Australia in the last 20 years; • Over two thirds (70%) were still available from Australian nurseries in 2004; • Over two thirds (72%) are not currently recognised as weeds under either State or Commonwealth legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Phenotypic Variation of Arum Species in Jordan
    Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Volume 4, No.4, 2008 Assessment of Phenotypic Variation of Arum Species in Jordan Siham Al-Lozi* , Ibrahim Makhadmeh**, Mahmud Duwayri***, Rida Shibli** and Hussein Migdadi* ABSTRACT Twenty-one locations scattered over eight provinces in Jordan were surveyed to assess the ecogeographical distribution of wild Arum species. Twenty-six morphological traits were measured on the collected species and populations to study the phenotypic diversities among and within species. Based on mean and standard deviation values, the highest variations were recorded for plant height, plant span, corm weight, spathe length, spadix length, leaf length and leaf mid-vein characters. Canonical discriminant analysis showed that leaf waxiness, spadix colour, spathe colour, leaf length, leaf width, plant span and leaf mid-vein are the main descriptors that can be used to differentiate among Arum species. Based on Euclidean distance coefficient, morphological characters showed a significant separation between Arum species with a similarity of 90.28% between A. palaestinum and A. dioscoridis, 74.90% between A. hygrophilum and A. dioscoridis and 82.18% between A. palaestinum and A. hygrophilum. The overall similarity analysis showed that the coefficient of similarity 81.40% was recorded among species over locations and 74.17% for species and locations combination. The results showed that Arum populations belonging to the same species are grouped in the same clusters regardless of collection site. In addition to the conservation of collected accessions in an operational gene bank, it is recommended to promote also the in situ conservation of Arum species. Keywords: Arum species, Phenotypic variation, Medicinal plants, ex situ conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Marj Sanour Biodiversity Preliminary Report
    Marj Sanour Biodiversity Preliminary Report 2010 TABLE OF CONTENT: CHAPTER1 ..............................................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................................8 METHODOLOGY.....................................................................................................................................9 FLORA .....................................................................................................................................................9 FLOWERING PLANTS ............................................................................................................................9 MUSHROOM ........................................................................................................................................ 13 FAUNA .................................................................................................................................................. 13 MAMMALS ........................................................................................................................................... 14 BIRDS ................................................................................................................................................... 14 REPTILES
    [Show full text]
  • The Diversity of Plants Used for the Traditional Dish Sarma in Turkey: Nature, Garden and Traditional Cuisine in the Modern Era
    Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture. 2017. 29(6): 429-440 doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2016-09-1238 http://www.ejfa.me/ REGULAR ARTICLE The diversity of plants used for the traditional dish sarma in Turkey: nature, garden and traditional cuisine in the modern era Yunus Dogan1, Anely Nedelcheva2*, Andrea Pieroni3 1Buca Faculty of Education, Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, Izmir, Turkey, 2Department of Botany, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Sofia, Bulgaria, 3University of Gastronomic Sciences, Bra, Pollenzo, Italy ABSTRACT The selection of leaves for the traditional dish sarma is the result of human experience and observation, and the transfer of traditional knowledge in regions differing in the richness of their species. The purpose of this study is to update the list of leaf vegetable plants that are used to prepare the traditional dish sarma and to analyse the biodiversity of the species used and their status in the Turkish flora. Seventy-three taxa whose leaves are used to prepare sarma in Turkey are reported. The prevalent species are those of Rumex (11), Salvia (5), Beta and Malva (4), Alcea, Arum, Brassica, Morus, and Plantago (3). Wild herbaceous plants (69.5%) dominate. Trees (8) and shrubs (2) mostly belong to the Rosaceae, Moraceae, Betulaceae and Malvaceae. Grapevine and cabbage predominate, together with beet, dock, sorrel, horseradish, European lime tree, bean, and spinach. The use of leaves of three endemics was recorded: Centaurea haradjianii, Rumex gracilescens, and Rumex olympicus. Some toxic plants are used following preliminary treatment, including those of Arum, Convolvulus, Tussilago and Smilax species. Colocasia esculenta is a novel sarma plant that has been used in cuisine in the last decade, following its introduction to Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Taro and Its Relatives: a Phylogeny of the Large Genus Alocasia (Araceae) Sheds Light on Miocene Floristic Exchange In
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63 (2012) 43–51 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Giant taro and its relatives: A phylogeny of the large genus Alocasia (Araceae) sheds light on Miocene floristic exchange in the Malesian region ⇑ ⇑ Lars Nauheimer a, , Peter C. Boyce b, Susanne S. Renner a, a Systematic Botany and Mycology, University of Munich (LMU), Menzinger-Str. 67, 80638 Munich, Germany b School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia article info abstract Article history: Alocasia comprises over 113 species of rainforest understorey plants in Southeast Asia, the Malesian Received 21 July 2011 region, and Australia. Several species, including giant taro, Alocasia macrorrhizos, and Chinese taro, Aloc- Revised 11 November 2011 asia cucullata, are important food plants or ornamentals. We investigated the biogeography of this genus Accepted 6 December 2011 using plastid and nuclear DNA sequences (5200 nucleotides) from 78 accessions representing 71 species, Available online 22 December 2011 plus 25 species representing 16 genera of the Pistia clade to which Alocasia belongs. Divergence times were inferred under strict and relaxed clock models, and ancestral areas with Bayesian and maximum Keywords: likelihood approaches. Alocasia is monophyletic and sister to Colocasia gigantea from the SE Asian main- Ancestral area reconstruction land, whereas the type species of Colocasia groups with Steudnera and Remusatia, requiring taxonomic Colocasia Miocene climatic optimum realignments. Nuclear and plastid trees show topological conflict, with the nuclear tree reflecting Molecular clock morphological similarities, the plastid tree species’ geographic proximity, suggesting chloroplast capture.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelterbelts Planted on Cultivated Fields Are Not Solutions for the Recovery of Former Forest-Related Herbaceous Vegetation
    land Article Shelterbelts Planted on Cultivated Fields Are Not Solutions for the Recovery of Former Forest-Related Herbaceous Vegetation Nóra Szigeti 1,* , Imre Berki 2, Andrea Vityi 2 and Leonid Rasran 3 1 Institute of Advanced Studies, 9730 K˝oszeg,Hungary 2 Institute of Environmental and Earth Sciences, University of Sopron, 9400 Sopron, Hungary; [email protected] (I.B.); [email protected] (A.V.) 3 Institute of Botany, Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Establishing shelterbelts for field protection is one of the rediscovered agroforestry prac- tices in Europe and Hungary. Several studies have focused on the effects of these plantations on agricultural production. Prior scholarship reveals that shelterbelts enhance the diversity of bird and insect communities but generally fail to consider herbaceous cover. Our study aimed to describe the herbaceous vegetation in shelterbelts of different origins, tree species composition, and land management. We investigated surveys in four agricultural landscapes of North West Hungary, where the intensity of the landscape transformation is different. The diversity and species composition of the herbaceous vegetation were analyzed, including plant sociology and forest affinity. Our results highlight the importance of landscape history in herbaceous flora. Shelterbelts planted on cultivated without an immediate connection to former woody vegetation soil are not appropriate for Citation: Szigeti, N.; Berki, I.; Vityi, the appearance of forest-related herbaceous species, regardless of tree species composition or the A.; Rasran, L. Shelterbelts Planted on extent of the shelterbelt. On the contrary, the remnants of former woody vegetation are refuges for Cultivated Fields Are Not Solutions those herbaceous species that are very slow at colonizing new plantations.
    [Show full text]
  • Oils and Fats Contents of Medicinal Plants, As Natural Ingredients for Many Therapeutic Purposes- a Review
    IOSR Journal Of Pharmacy (e)-ISSN: 2250-3013, (p)-ISSN: 2319-4219 Volume 10, Issue 7 Series. II (July 2020), PP. 01-41 www.iosrphr.org Oils and fats contents of medicinal plants, as natural ingredients for many therapeutic purposes- A review Ali Esmail Al-Snafi Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, Thi qar University, Iraq. Received 06 July 2020; Accepted 21-July 2020 Abstracts Oils and fats were extracted from different plants by using many methods of extraction. They were used as gastroprotective, carminative, antiemetic, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiprotozoal, insect repellents, antioxidant, anticancer, antidiabetic and antimutagenic and many other properties. The current review discussed the amounts and types of fats and oils extracted from different medicinal plants as a promising therabies for many medical complains. Keywords: fats, essential oils, volatile oils, medicinal plants, pharmacology I. INTRODUCTION: Plants play an important role in the development of new drugs. Plant oils have been used as therapy since early times. Plants oils were extraction by many methods included cold pressing, hydrodistillation, steam distillation, hydrodiffusion, effleurage, solvent extraction, carbondioxide extraction and microwave assisted process(1). The oils were valuable natural products used in many fields included perfumes, cosmetics, aromatherapy, phytotherapy, spices and nutrition, insecticides(2). They were used medicinally for their gastroprotective, carminative, antiemetic, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiprotozoal, insect repellents, antioxidant, anticancer, antidiabetic and antimutagenic properties(3). This review was designed to investigate the plants containing fats and essential and volatile oils as a promising therapeutic remidies. Fats and oils of medicinal plants Achillea santolina The concentration of the essential oil in the dry Achillea santolina ranged from 0.11-0.20 % in ten genotypes of this species (4).
    [Show full text]