Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
ATTACHMENT 1 Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Contents Page No. 1. Public Authority Submissions (10 submissions) ...... 1 2. Community Submissions (633 submissions) ...... 5 3. Industry Group Submissions (9 submissions) ...... 85 4. Public Meeting Summary ...... 88
1. Public Authority Submissions (10 submissions)
Sub. ECM Public Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # Doc. ID Authority Mosman LSPS? 508 5715201 Department of Housing Mosman contains 70 social housing properties all over 31 Social housing is important as part of the Yes – Within Planning Planning, years old. NSW Government seeking to grow social housing mix for people on lower incomes, Priority 5, text included Industry and housing portfolio per NSW Govt’s Future Directions in including older people and people with a within rationale to note the Environment Social Housing Strategy 2016. Suggest including an disability. There are around 70 social housing importance of social housing (Land and action to support the maintenance and renewal of social properties in Mosman within apartments and reference social Housing housing. located on Spit Road. housing properties in Corporation) Mosman. A new action is also included re collaboration with the NSW Government to maintain existing social housing. 605 5712773 NSW Aboriginal Heritage Encourage councils to use goals/actions of Example Addressed in Planning Priorities 3 and 8. There No Land Council LSPS prepared by DPIE for local councils to work in are no Aboriginal land holdings or claims in partnership with LALCs to promote tourism, enhance the Mosman. Most Aboriginal heritage sites in economic self-determination of Aboriginal Communities Mosman are located on public land within through their land holdings, and protect and celebrate Sydney Harbour National Park. Aboriginal culture and heritage. 632 5716732 Cancer Institute Other Support protecting and enhancing Mosman's urban tree Council provides shade through increasing Yes – New Planning Priority NSW canopy. Suggest include a new planning priority re canopy cover, and building shaded areas within 4 included re healthy built healthy built environments (Design and provide places recreation spaces (e.g. shade cloths over play environments. The title of and spaces that are healthy to live in, to work in and to equipment, bbq seating areas, and around the planning priority is as visit), and focus on need to provide shade to reduce UV public amenities buildings). per CI NSW’s suggestion, exposure. Healthy built environments are more than however the planning providing shade. According to the UNSW City priority, rationale and Wellbeing Program, physical activity, social actions cover much more connection and healthy food options are also than shade, instead more factors contributing to a healthy built broadly explaining the environment. Many existing Council initiatives importance of carefully respond to these criteria. planned built environments to ensure the health and well-being of the community.
Page 53 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Public Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # Doc. ID Authority Mosman LSPS? 642 5717781 Taronga Economy & Emphasise the strategic and regional importance of Taronga Zoo’s role as a significant tourism Yes – The Structure Plan Conservation Tourism Taronga Zoo within Sydney and NSW. attractor in Mosman is adequately stated in the has been revised and Society Investigate rezoning the Zoo from SP1 to SP3 to facilitate draft LSPS. The zoo is referenced 11 times additional maps included Australia tourism-related development and uses. including being shown on maps. within the Appendix to clarify (submission ‘sensitive’ land in Mosman. Support an amendment to MLEP2012 exempt schedule Taronga Zoo is zoned SP1 Zoological Gardens written by under MLEP2012, which permits zoological Additional text has also Urbis) to adjust capital investment value (CIV) threshold for zoo from $1mil to $2mil. gardens and any development that is ordinarily been included within incidental or ancillary to development for that Planning Priority 11 Clarify why Zoo is identified on Structure Plan (page 27) purpose. This zone reflects the primary regarding tourism, and the as being within a sensitive area. No details of the purpose of the site and is reasonable. Zone opportunities and ‘protection and management measures’ relating to this SP3 would permit a broad range of ‘tourism challenges that this brings in land are given. The shading is confusing. and visitor accommodation’ uses (i.e. Mosman. backpackers, hotels, serviced apartments) independent of the zoo. This raises many issues including impact on resident amenity, traffic and appropriate use of public land. The request re exempt threshold will be considered as part of the LEP review. The zoo is located within a coastal management area, bushfire prone, located within a scenic protection area and heritage listed. 644 5719370 Department of Other Concerned to ensure that the long-term viability of HMAS Noted. The draft LSPS does not propose any No Defence Penguin is not compromised through inappropriate significant change in the vicinity of HMAS development on surrounding land. Requests Council Penguin. prudently consider any land use or development proposals in the vicinity. Cautions against the assumption that the use of the Defence Estate will remain static. 646 5720839 Sydney Water Open Space & Encourage Council to proactively engage with Sydney Council staff contacted Sydney Water on 27 Yes – re water quality, refer Sustainability Water to align development with the delivery of new water August 2019 regarding land use zoning. to comments below to and wastewater infrastructure. Recommend Council Sydney Water advised of a site in Upper Spit similar issues raised in the expand planning priority 2 re collaboration, and requests Road which should be rezoned to SP2, NSW EPA submission. Council consider appropriate land use zoning for water consistent with the zoning of other Sydney related infrastructure. Water assets in Mosman (i.e. SP2 Drainage or Place further emphasis on good water quality; incorporate SP2 Public Utility Undertaking under Mosman elements of water sensitive urban design into new and LEP 2012). This will be considered in future existing areas; consider planning controls which aim to LEP amendments. maintain or improve local waterways and marine Council collaborates with various NSW environments; monitor to evaluate the effectiveness of Government agencies and others on a regular current water quality activities. basis. Several examples are given in the rationale for Planning Priority 2. Re water quality – refer to comments below to similar issues raised in the NSW EPA submission.
2
Page 54 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Public Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # Doc. ID Authority Mosman LSPS? 649 5723293 NSW Open Space & A generic submission re the content that should/needs to The issues raised in the EPA submission are Yes – Within Planning Environment Sustainability be included in a council’s draft LSPS in planning for mostly addressed within the draft LSPS, or not Priority 12, text has been Protection sustainability and resilience. relevant to Mosman. included expanding upon Authority Planning Priorities 12, 15 and 16 within the Council initiatives re Contaminated land: support SEPP 55 Remediation of draft LSPS relate to sustainability. Many protection of the Land and associated guidelines, and include an action Council initiatives, plans and policies are listed environment. A new action to consider contaminated land in local planning in the draft LSPS. Following receipt of this has been included re instruments submission, additional content has been Council service contracts. included as noted in adjacent column. Within Planning Priority 15, Waste and Resource Recovery (WRR): identify Contaminated land – Mosman’s DCPs contain new paragraphs have been outcomes that help support and deliver WRR targets in planning controls regarding contaminated land. added re Council’s initiatives NSW, National and UN strategy and policy; encourage State planning policy also applies to Mosman. re waste and recycling. New the consideration of WRR with a circular economy actions have been added re – perspective; encourage community education, and WRR Waste initiatives and outcomes are collaboration with NSROC WSROC action re WRR identified. There are no waste management and Northern Beaches facilities in Mosman. Mosman has many Council in waste recycling community education initiatives to encourage and management. Air quality and land use conflicts: identify outcomes recycling and reuse. NSROC action re waste is that support meeting national air quality standards; included in the draft LSPS. Within Planning Priority 16, include an action to consider air quality; set directions new paragraphs have been Air quality and land-use conflict - There is no for enhanced planning controls to help minimise added to address urban and industrial zoned land in Mosman, nor any major emissions from major sources and avoid air pollution natural hazards. polluting industries. Air quality issues impacts on residential and other sensitive land-uses associated with traffic is noted within the draft Within the Appendix, new LSPS. maps are included showing the coastal management Healthy waterways: include objectives to maintain or Waterways - Mosman is largely surrounded by enhance water quality and waterway health to achieve area, acid sulphate soils and Sydney and Middle Harbours. There are no natural waterways. goals in NSW Water Quality and River Flow substantial waterways within Mosman. Council Objectives; outline management options; include initiatives re healthy waterways are noted in the community consultation; consider impacts and/or draft LSPS. opportunities of management on downstream waterways; include an action to include LEP clauses Noise and land-use conflict - There are no and DCP controls on water quality / waterway health; major noise-generating industries in Mosman. ensure collaboration with councils in catchment area. Noise is generated from road traffic on the arterial road. Mosman’s DCPs includes design controls to mitigate noise from road traffic. Noise and land-use conflicts: identify external noise
goals for infrastructure and industry; include actions to consider environmental noise in all local planning instruments, and set directions for enhanced planning controls to help minimise emissions noise impacts on residential and other sensitive land-uses 650 5724290 Sydney Open Space & Support planning priorities on collaboration, conserving Noted. Council collaborates regularly with the Yes – Within Planning Harbour Sustainability the natural environment, significant heritage and public Trust on recreation and other matters. Council Priority 14, new action 4 is Federation transport. has recently submitted a Planning Application included re collaboration Trust (the Draw Council’s attention to the Trust’s recently finalised to the Trust for the installation of flood lighting with the Trust and National Trust) Recreation Strategy 2019. Where a proposal to a Council at the existing netball courts at the Mosman Parks and Wildlife Service facility may affect Headland Park, request that Council Drill Hall. to ensure coordinated consult with the Trust and consider relevant Trust plans to outcomes for recreational
3
Page 55 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Public Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # Doc. ID Authority Mosman LSPS? ensure coordinated outcomes. spaces at Middle and Georges Head. 651 5729569 Transport for Traffic & Focussing growth along Spit/Military Roads outside of Future growth will largely be focussed in the Yes – Within Planning NSW Transport local centres may increase congestion without demand centres. There are existing housing Priority 9, amendments management measures, or active transport. Focus growth opportunities within R3, B2 and B6 zoning have been made to better within compact, walkable, mixed use centres. under Mosman Local Environmental Plan 2012. identify active transport Mosman has been earmarked in Future Transport 2056 The Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches measures, freight, existing for 0-10 years committed initiatives (Northern Beaches B- Link presents an opportunity to consider public transport and Council Line and Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link). improvements in amenity and connection along initiatives. Consider a movement and place approach. Spit/Military Roads. A new Planning Priority 10 Consider freight and servicing. Clarify active transport Spit/Military Roads is the primary route for has been included re the measures. Identify public transport in Mosman. Identify freight within Mosman. Council works with Spit-Military Roads Corridor initiatives to reduce greenhouse gases. NHVR to consider freight movements and and opportunities that may ensure public safety. exist should the Western Harbour Tunnel and Mosman is serviced by Sydney Buses and Beaches Link be Sydney Ferries. There are many cycling and constructed. walking routes throughout Mosman, and Council has works programs for improvements. Within Planning Priority 7, Council has initiatives to manage existing new text has been included public parking areas, reduce reliance on private re the importance of vehicles and so on. considering freight in planning for centres. The Structure Plan and Location Maps have also been updated to show the main bus and ferry routes to Mosman. 652 5766658 NSW Premier & Heritage Support many of the initiatives in the draft Mosman Mosman’s heritage is an important and Yes - Planning Priority 11 Cabinet Statement, including the vision, planning priorities and celebrated feature of the municipality. This is has been expanded upon to (Heritage NSW) actions which seek to protect and conserve Aboriginal recognised within the draft LSPS, within identify tourism and and non-Aboriginal heritage, and the scenic protection Planning Priority 8 primarily Protect and visitation initiatives that area. conserve the natural, built and Aboriginal celebrate Mosman’s culture Suggest matters that Council consider when finalising the cultural heritage of Mosman, and elsewhere in and heritage. draft LSPS, including considering how Aboriginal heritage the document. can be protected within MLEP2012; character statements Inclusion of Aboriginal heritage within the LEP recognising heritage as a fundamental aspect of the requires further discussion with Heritage NSW identity of a place; and linkages between heritage and and the DPIE. Aboriginal heritage is not tourism. included within MLEP2012 consistent with the advice of DPIE. Planning Priority 6, Action 2, is to consider approaches for integrating character into land use planning as per the NSW Government’s Local Character and Place Guideline, 2019. Mosman Junction (within the Military Road Heritage Conservation Area) may be a suitable candidate.
4
Page 56 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Public Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # Doc. ID Authority Mosman LSPS? Planning Priority 11 identifies some of Mosman’s heritage that may attract visitors, e.g. military relics within Sydney Harbour National Park, and the traditional heritage high- street of Military Road.
2. Community Submissions (633 submissions)
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 1 5694142 James Lovell Housing Owners of properties identified as No. 214 Spit Road and The subject sites are located at the northern No (on behalf of No. 2 Medusa Street are seeking to have R2 Low Density end of Spit Road, on the corner of Medusa owners of 214 Residential land rezoned to R3 Medium Density Street, and currently zoned R2 Low Density Spit Rd 2 Residential. Residential under MLEP 2012. The site is Medusa St) The sites are suitable for rezoning in terms of topography, adjacent to Saint Therese Catholic Church (Mosman) existing vegetation, planning overlays and matters, (zoned SP2). Land to the north and west along proximity to main roads and public transport, Medusa Street is zoned R2, whilst land neighbourhood character, Mosman residential opposite the site and further along Spit Road is development strategy and the North District Plan. zoned R3 Medium Density Residential. For the reasons given in the Council report, amending MLEP 2012 to facilitate greater density is not supported at this time. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. Within the draft LSPS, housing is addressed in Planning Priorities 5 and 6. 2 5696349 Zoe Holland Mosman Support Council changing planning controls to limit the Within the draft LSPS, the importance of Yes – Amendments to 5696350 (Mosman) Junction size of retail premises in Mosman Junction. Objects to maintaining the village atmosphere, character Planning Priority 7 to supermarket any large scale supermarket in Mosman Village/Mosman and heritage of Mosman Junction is included strengthen reference to the Junction, including Woolworths. within Council’s Vision and Planning Priority 7. village atmosphere within Large scale retail would destroy local character and The development of land in Mosman Junction rationale and action undermine residential amenity by increasing traffic and is subject to MLEP 2012 and the Mosman reducing variety of shops. Any large scale supermarket Business Centres DCP 2012, which contain and development would impact struggling local controls relating to height, bulk, heritage, businesses and erode the nature of shopping and living in design, traffic, parking and amenity. the community. Consideration will be given to reviewing There are numerous large scale Woolworths and Coles planning controls for Mosman Junction to within a short distance of Mosman. ensure that the village atmosphere is maintained. Refer to the Council report for a more detailed discussion on this issue. 3 5695501 M. Long Mosman Fully supports the vision of the LSPS and Council Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction committing to keep the village feel. Limits should be set submission #2.
5
Page 57 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket for future commercial developments to maintain Mosman's village atmosphere. Traffic & Traffic is a problem and is set to increase with the The draft LSPS recognises that traffic Yes – Amendments to Transport population increasing, would like alternative public congestion in Mosman is a significant issue. Planning Priority 9 to outline transport options for Northern Beaches’ commuters. Planning Priority 9 includes actions to advocate Council initiatives and to the NSW Government for solutions to reduce collaboration re access and regional traffic congestion on Spit-Military active transport. New Roads, to collaborate on solutions to manage Planning Priority 10 demand, and to prepare and implement an responds to the Western Active Transport Strategy for Mosman. Harbour Tunnel and Planning Priority 10 responds to the NSW Beaches Link, and Government’s infrastructure commitment for opportunities for Mosman. construction of the Western Harbour Tunnel and Beaches Link, and the opportunities that this may bring for Mosman as a result of the forecast reduction in traffic volume. 4 5700214 Colin Gunn Mosman Pro-forma submission: Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Opposed to a large scale supermarket, such as a submission #2. supermarket Woolworths, in Mosman Junction or Mosman Village. Concerned that a large scale retail outlet will destroy the local character and undermine residential amenity with significantly increased traffic congestion and a reduction in the variety of shops. Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises to only allow small local shops in Mosman Junction and Mosman Village. Small shops better service the needs of our community in a competitive traditional low-rise shopfront environment. 5 5702299 Clare Stock Mosman Against Woolworths plans to build a complex in Mosman. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction It would mean the closure of many shops, the destruction submission #2. supermarket of the village atmosphere, and affect the traffic flow in the area. 6 5702308 Helen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McGowan Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 7 5702309 Betsy Conti Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 8 5702310 Sandra Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kozleuchar Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 9 5702314 Penny Hope Mosman Opposed to Woolworths and its proposed development. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Murray Junction Several local retailers have closed at the thought of this submission #2.
6
Page 58 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Undisclosed) supermarket development, more retailers will be lost. The Woolworths proposal would destroy the village character, bring traffic chaos, threaten pedestrian safety of students, drive local shops out of business, reduce variety and quality of goods sold locally, reduce neighbouring residents quality of life and diminish the village's architectural feel. 10 5702321 Monique Mosman Opposed to a large supermarket, such as Woolworths in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Aschner Junction Mosman Village, due to concerns regarding impact on submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket local businesses and on the village feel. Harris Farm and IGA are upgrading facilities, therefore another large outlet is unnecessary. It's a money making exercise for Woolworths, not about providing for the community. 11 5702322 Will Riley Mosman A major aspect of Mosman's unique charm is the village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction feel with local, predominantly independent, shops serving submission #2. supermarket the community. Vehemently opposed of the prospect of a major Woolworths Development. It would be unconscionable for any Councillor to support this application. 12 5702359 Pam Heritage Ensure that the highest protections are given to heritage Development on heritage sites is regulated by No Lofthouse items and conservations areas, current approach not clause 5.10 of MLEP 2012 (mandated by the (Mosman) adequate. There has been too much local development NSW Government). A heritage impact where only "token" conservation has occurred i.e. statement is required to be submitted to retaining just facades. Restrict the demolition of heritage Council with any development application for assets possible in only the most exceptional cases. works on a heritage listed item or within a conservation area, which is considered by Council’s Heritage Advisor in the assessment of the proposal. Council takes pride in initiatives such as the Heritage Advisory Service and Heritage Assistance Fund which support the conservation of Mosman’s 500+ heritage items and 1,300+ properties within conservation areas. Within the draft LSPS, heritage is addressed in Planning Priority 8. Mosman Particular concerns about weakening strategic heritage Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction objectives related to the mooted development by submission #2. supermarket Woolworths. 13 5702360 Patrick Michel Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 14 5702361 Michelle Mosman Mosman Village is unique and exhibits that sense of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Johnson Junction community which is diminishing with the increase in urban submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket living. Urge council to retain the respect and expectation of its electorate and maintain that which is still unique in Mosman. Mosman residents are prepared to travel to
7
Page 59 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Neutral Bay to go to a Supermarket. 15 5702362 Kateg Mosman Opposed to Woolworths due to traffic and pedestrian Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction safety implications and loss of character to Mosman submission #2. supermarket Village. 16 5702363 Julie Goodsir Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 17 5702365 Hans Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hendrischke Junction Particularly concerned about increased traffic on Belmont submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Road endangering school children. 18 5702366 Justine Mosman Large scale development in Mosman Village will have Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Stephen Junction significant impacts on traffic and pedestrian safety, local submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket businesses and goods, and architectural heritage. Housing More houses or units will not assist affordability. Within the draft LSPS, housing is addressed in No Overdevelopment, insufficient street access and narrow Planning Priorities 5 and 6. MLEP 2012 streets are causing 24/7 noise and pollution. facilitates a diversity of housing types providing choice, and supports people in need through community service programs. The constraint of poor road capacity in Mosman is recognised as an issue, as is the varied landform, established subdivision pattern, narrow streets and lack of surplus land. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 19 5702367 Ros Bastian Mosman Protest the possible development proposed by Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths. Mosman has adequate choice with enough submission #2. supermarket supermarkets located in Mosman and surrounding areas. This development would destroy the village character, bring extreme traffic chaos and threaten pedestrian, threaten the viability of local businesses reduce neighbouring residents’ quality of life, diminish the village’s architectural heritage. 20 5702368 Maria Psaltis Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Increased traffic congestion would impact both locals and submission #2. supermarket visitors 21 5702369 Susan Woods Mosman Planning controls should be changed to limit the size of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction retail premises to allow only small local shops in Mosman submission #2. supermarket Village. 22 5702370 Siena Dune Mosman Concerns of the impact to Mosman Village of the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Ian Junction proposed Woolworth Development. Such a development submission #2. Buchanan supermarket would destroy character of Mosman, create traffic (Mosman) congestion, increase pedestrian risk and drive local shops out of business. Mosman has no need for Woolworths as
8
Page 60 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? there are suitable outlets in Mosman and surrounding suburbs. 23 5702371 Mary Moors Mosman Strongly opposed to Woolworths plans to develop in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman Village due to concerns of impact on local submission #2. supermarket character and beauty, and increased traffic. There is not a need for another supermarket in Mosman. 24 5702372 Michelle A Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Johnson Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 25 5702373 Angela Mosman The Woolworth proposal is too big a scale for the area. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Nymalm Junction Opposed to the proposal for huge new build for the area submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket as Mosman will lose its character. 26 5702374 David Howell Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction The community needs small local businesses as they submission #2. supermarket provide a better range of quality goods and services. 27 5702375 Grahame Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Petersen Junction Satisfied with the feel of the current shopping precinct. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Parking is reasonable, and there are adequate goods and services available. 28 5702376 Ian Fields Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 29 5702377 Dr Eoin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Wilson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 30 5702378 Maon Sher Mosman Object to the proposed Woolworth Development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman Junction as it would force the closure of many submission #2. supermarket small local businesses, there is no need for Woolworths supermarket with Cremorne only a few minutes away and it is not consistent with the development planning of the area. 31 5702379 Maria Stinson Mosman Against a new Woolworths in Mosman as the area will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction change forever if one was opened. Businesses will be submission #2. supermarket ruined and many will lose employment. 32 5702380 Bill O’Neill Mosman Opposed to the Woolworth development as Mosman is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction adequately serviced by an Aldi in Mosman and a submission #2. supermarket Woolworths in Neutral Bay, existing shops will close and adverse traffic impacts from shoppers and delivery truck. 33 5702381 Dr Perry Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McIntyre Junction Opposed to a Woolworths Express too. Bridge Point submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket services the needs of residents. 34 5702382 Stan Devine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2.
9
Page 61 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket 35 5702383 Hugh Mosman Opposed to a new Woolworths in Mosman as local shops Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Richards Junction will be killed off and the High Street will lose its character. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 36 5702385 Matilda Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thompson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 37 5702386 Alison Devine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 38 5702387 Chris Goold Mosman Opposed to a large scale retail development, such as that Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction proposed by Woolworths. Mosman must retain the village submission #2. supermarket atmosphere character. New planning controls should limit the size of retail premises to retain small shopfronts, low rise buildings and a diversity of outlets. 39 5702388 Sarah Mosman Opposed to a large scale supermarket in Mosman Village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Williams Junction as it would impact local character, residential amenity, submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket traffic congestion and reduce the variety of shops. Support changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. Military Road shops are iconic and key to making this an attractive place. Open Space & Plan should address how to develop a more sustainable Planning Priority 15 addresses energy, water Yes – Some revision has Sustainability approach - better recycling, lower energy and more and waste efficiency, including recycling and been made to Planning flexible spaces. waste management. It details Mosman’s Priority 15 to identify Council energy consumption and amount of CO2 initiatives, and include released in 2016-17. Action 1 is to support actions re waste initiatives that contribute to the aspirational management objective of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Initiatives include the installation of solar panels on civic buildings, and to accelerate LED conversion of residential lighting. 40 5702389 Pamiela Mosman A Woolworths in Mosman would destroy the village and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction village atmosphere. Must ensure Mosman does not lose submission #2. supermarket its uniqueness. There are two Woolworths in Neutral Bay - that is enough. 41 5702408 Peter Neufeld Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 42 5702438 Trent Hagland Mosman The future of Mosman was inextricably linked to the future Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction of the Village, which should remain unique, local, and submission #2. supermarket ’small-yield’. Opposed to large-scale development in Mosman village, specifically a Woolworths, which would destroy local character and doesn’t represent residents interest, values and characteristics.
10
Page 62 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 43 5702515 Adrian Mosman Concerned about the potential development of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Topping Junction Woolworths on Military Rd with impacts to traffic, parking submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket and local character. It would be inconsistent with the Plan’s key statements including "protect and manage
sensitive land", "lack capacity in the road network" and "preserving Mosman's distinctive character” and it would not meet any of the planning priorities. 44 5702559 Rodney Mosman Object to any development on Military Rd for a major Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hyman AM Junction supermarket and/or shopping centre. A major submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket supermarket will have a negative effect on the amenity and village atmosphere of Mosman Village, and will be the demise of the many unique shops. A supermarket will add significantly to the traffic and parking problem on Military Rd. 45 5702580 Gillian H Mosman The proposed Woolworths development would damage Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Downie Junction the character and worth of Mosman, and increase the submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket noise levels, traffic and general disruptions. The community prefer local strip shops with personal touch and care. Concerned that Woolworths 'secretly' bought a whole strip of shops without public knowledge and are doing something wrong. 46 5702583 Victoria May Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction There are plenty of shops with Woolworths at Neutral submission #2. supermarket Bay and Crows Nest. 47 5702603 Amanda Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Stelcova Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 48 5702672 Jenny Atkins Mosman Opposed to the Proposed Woolworths Development due Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction to concerns over traffic congestion and loss of small local submission #2. supermarket shops. Mosman has adequate supermarkets locally and in surrounding suburbs. Implore the Council to reject this inappropriate development to preserve the character of Mosman and the Village. 49 5702691 John Mosman Concerns over the proposed Woolworths development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Loughnan and Junction Mosman. The development will drive many small submission #2. Jeanette Cox supermarket businesses out and change the nature of Mosman village (Mosman) permanently and is not appropriate for Mosman. Most Mosman residents would oppose this proposed development. 50 5702730 Jane Riley Mosman Vehemently opposed to the prospect of a large-scale Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction supermarket, such as a Woolworths, being built at submission #2. supermarket Mosman Junction/Village. It would destroy the local character, push out smaller shops and undermine residential amenity, increase traffic and reduce the variety of shops. Support Council changing planning controls to
11
Page 63 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? limit the size of retail premises at Mosman Junction/Village. 51 5702732 Prue Kenny Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 52 5702735 Kristy Pollard Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths proposal in Mosman. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction is too large scale, will drive out all local business and will submission #2. supermarket completely destroy the current village atmosphere, character and charm. The community wants local shopkeepers. Council should change planning controls to limit the size of retail outlets. 53 5702805 Virginia Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Carrick Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 54 5702890 Prof. Kim Mosman Object to the Woolworths proposal on Military Road for Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Oates AM and Junction the following reasons: submission #2. Mrs Robyn supermarket • Mosman has enough supermarkets and there are Oates Woolworths in Neutral Bay. (Mosman) • It will destroy the much loved “village” atmosphere along Military Road. • It will exacerbate congestion problems on Military Rd and increase risk of pedestrian accidents. • Local shops will go out of business if competing with Woolworths prices. 55 5702974 Grant Blackley Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Character has been lost with multiple banks and real submission #2. supermarket estate agents taking prime leases. Increased traffic resulting from the zoo has already worsened traffic. 56 5702992 Skip Webb Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 57 5702995 Clare Mosman Against Woolworths building a complex in Mosman. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to 5710019 Stockdale Junction would mean the closure of many small shops that give submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Mosman its village character, make the traffic even worse and would take years to build, leaving the area in chaos. 58 5702996 Francine K Mosman Vehemently oppose and demand that Council reject Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths' application. Mosman is a unique suburb with submission #2. supermarket a village atmosphere, free of ugly and unnecessary large chain stores. A huge development and grocery outlet such as Woolworths in the village is an outrage. In Neutral Bay there are two Woolworths within walking distance of each other. 59 5703043 Michelle Mosman Opposed to the Woolworths Development proposal. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Johnston Junction
12
Page 64 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Undisclosed) supermarket submission #2. 60 5703044 Jim Johnston Mosman Opposed to the Woolworths Development proposal. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Please do not allow the destruction of our unique village submission #2. supermarket atmosphere. Mosman does not ever need this type of development. 61 5703045 David Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 62 5703088 Nicola Gates Mosman Love Mosman’s small village feel and small shops that Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction give it unique character. Opposed to Woolworths in submission #2. supermarket Mosman because Impacts on traffic, congestion, parking, road access and pedestrian safety (close proximity to schools), do not need another large food retailer, loss of village feel, monolithic Woolworths is not good for local businesses 63 5703089 Phil Costa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 64 5703126 Gillian Mosman Opposed to a large scale supermarket such as Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Armstrong & Junction Woolworths, in Mosman. It contradicts the Planning submission #2. John Pleffer supermarket Statement, will destroy the Village character, will increase (Mosman) traffic and congestion and will drive local shops out of business. Mosman is serviced by other supermarkets within Mosman and surrounding suburbs. Strongly support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. Low rise shop fronts form the sense of heritage and charm of Mosman. 65 5703276 R M Harris Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 66 5703277 Eva Havas Mosman Love the village atmosphere in Mosman. Traffic is already Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction creating congestion, a large shopping centre and parking submission #2. supermarket will create real problems. Can be seen in Crows Nest where a Woolworths is creating traffic issues. 67 5703278 Gino Joseph Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 68 5703279 Jenny West Mosman Opposed the Woolworths development in Mosman for the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction following reasons: submission #2. supermarket • The impact on the local village atmosphere. • Increased congestion on an already busy road and pedestrian safety (near a school and aged care home). • Impact on local businesses and their viability. • Residents already have a large supermarket selection in
13
Page 65 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Mosman and surrounding suburbs. • Lack of community consultation. 69 5703280 Josephine Mosman Object to a large-scale retail and residential development, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Richards Junction including a Woolworths supermarket, at Mosman submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Junction. The uniqueness and village feel of the precinct must be preserved by focussing on opportunities for small-scale businesses and making the area as pedestrian friendly as possible. 70 5703281 Susan Sieur Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 71 5703282 Andy Kennard Mosman Strongly object to Woolworths developing a huge Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction supermarket, shopping mall and residential complex. It submission #2. supermarket will destroy the village atmosphere of the Mosman Junction shops, put out of business the many small shop owners and increase traffic during construction and operation. Mosman has more than enough supermarkets. 72 5703283 Cathie & Jim Mosman A new Woolworths development will have a negative Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bertouch Junction impact on small businesses, aesthetic presence and submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket council revenue. The massive footprint will stand for many and suck the life out of our village. Mosman is a 10 minute drive from a nearby Woolworths, which also offers a delivery service. Mosman Junction should retain the village feel and aim to improve it with matching shop awnings should have been introduced years ago, more trees, plants, street lamps, beautify laneways. 73 5703284 Geelong63 Mosman Mosman Junction’s village atmosphere with quality Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction shops, cafes and small businesses in general is submission #2. supermarket enjoyable. Strongly object to the current Woolworths plan to totally disrupt the Mosman area by knocking down heritage buildings. There are already two Woolworths stores in Neutral Bay, there is no need to destroy the beautiful environment with another. 74 5703285 Alexandra Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Matthews Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 75 5703286 Richard Mosman Opposed to the proposed Woolworth supermarket in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Williamson Junction Mosman. It is completely unnecessary and will cause submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket traffic congestion and the loss of small non chain retailers will be considerable. Prefer to use the existing shops in Mosman than a Woolworths. 76 5703287 Justin Doyle Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction It would reduce resident quality of life and diminish the submission #2. supermarket Village's architectural heritage and character.
14
Page 66 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 77 5703288 Sheree Fields Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 78 5703289 Susan Bailey Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction One of Mosman’s greatest assets is its village feel. submission #2. supermarket Mosman Village has traffic issues, any large scale development will increase traffic issues and impact the village feel. 79 5703290 Elizabeth Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman Village, Council Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Mulholland Junction should do all in their power to deny Woolworths. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 80 5703291 Moritz V H Mosman Opposed to a large format supermarket like Woolworths Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction being built in the Mosman Village. It will destroy the submission #2. supermarket village feel, drive smaller shops into bankruptcy, create additional traffic issues. There are plenty of large supermarkets in close proximity, one in the village will not provide any benefits. 81 5703292 Dr Leesa Rix Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 82 5703293 Vianney Mosman Opposed to the proposed development of Woolworths & Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McCracken Junction additional retail/residential buildings in Mosman. The submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket site’s size will destroy the village environment characteristic of the area. Increased traffic along Military Rd will increase congestion. Mosman does not need a major supermarket. Keep this beautiful area as a village. 83 5703294 Isobel Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kerridge Junction Mosman is already serviced with 2 Woolworths and a submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Coles in the local vicinity. 84 5703295 Jill and Mosman Vehemently opposed to a new Woolworths in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gunther Junction Village. It would destroy the integrity of the village and submission #2. Schmidt- supermarket bring further chaos to traffic situation which is already Lindner unsustainable. (Undisclosed) 85 5703296 Henrietta Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Tilelli Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 86 5703297 Victoria Mosman Greatly opposed to a possible large scale supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Neufeld Junction proposition such as Woolworths which will change the submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket character of Mosman completely. Support Council changing planning controls to limit large shopfronts, keep small shops and keep Mosman a low rise shopfront environment. 87 5703457 Sara de Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
15
Page 67 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Campos, Junction submission #2. Vassalo supermarket Sampaio Soares (Mosman) 88 5703516 Greta Davis Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 89 5703517 Jacqueline Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to May and Will Junction Any large scale supermarket development in Mosman submission #2. Sweeney supermarket village would not be in the best interest of the Mosman (Mosman) community, nor be consistent with planning priorities 2, 3, 6, 8 of the draft LSPS. 90 5703518 Thomas Frank Mosman Opposed Woolworths plans for Mosman. Large Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to & Family Junction developments, such as Woolworths, do not fit into this submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket village and will destroy its beauty and character, and should not go ahead. Mosman Club building is not past its use by date. Housing Encourage Council to produce a plan that stops large Within the draft LSPS, housing is addressed in No scale developments with principles that allow sensible Planning Priorities 5 and 6. MLEP 2012 renewal and modernity without large scale blocks and facilitates a diversity of housing types, high rises. permitting a scale of development ranging from two to five storeys depending on site location. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 91 5703567 Keryn Mar Mosman Opposed to the prospect of Woolworths trying to establish Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction multi-storey apartments block and a supermarket due to submission #2. supermarket increased traffic, deterioration of the village culture and risk to local businesses, which will change the face of the village and threaten the environment. There are no shortages of supermarkets in the area which are already established and very easy to access from Mosman. 92 5703650 John and Mosman The draft LSPS captures the main concerns of the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dianne Junction community and the vision is spot on. We like the “village submission #2. Gleeson supermarket feel” lifestyle with the small speciality shops offering a (Undisclosed) great diversity. Opposed to a proposed development the size of the one being considered by Woolworths - it is out of character and there’s access to adequate shops in Mosman and nearby. Traffic & Concerned about over development of Mosman and Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport traffic congestion, particularly around Belmont Rd, Military submission #3. Rd and Gouldsbury St. 93 5703675 Leigh Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jenkinson Junction submission #2.
16
Page 68 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket 94 5703696 Lesley Mosman The Woolworths development will have a profound effect Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Watson Junction on the established way of life of residents. The main submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket street stores in Mosman provide services and a place for the residents to chat, establish relationships and be happy. Woolworths would change that forever, the community would no longer build relationships with shop keepers and there would be a negative social effect. 95 5703929 Anna Booty Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 96 5704006 Dawn J Mosman Against any development by Woolworths. The Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction development will change our neighbourhood and village submission #2. supermarket atmosphere, it will be dangerous to have the traffic and other associated nuisances, right on the doorstep of a High School. 97 5704008 Helen Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths Supermarket in Mosman. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kirkman Junction Mosman is already well serviced by supermarkets and by submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket fresh produce providers. There is already too much traffic congestion. Need to support local businesses. Invite investors, broaden reach, think outside the box, get advice from other progressive councils. Loss of community connection can result in growth of mental illness. Need to provide opportunities for all the members of our community (e.g. open air restaurants, coffee bars, meeting places, encourage later trading, etc.). Many local businesses have closed. The village atmosphere is what people most want and must be preserved. 98 5704041 Kay Peacock Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 99 5704103 Tania Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Netterfield Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 100 5704104 Andrew Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Maccoll Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 101 5704105 Tania Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Netterfield Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 102 5704106 Rizwan Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Akhund Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 103 5704400 Jim Collopy Mosman Opposed to any Woolworths development in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction Junction. Mosman Junction is identified in the draft LSPS
17
Page 69 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Undisclosed) supermarket as a Heritage Conservation Area characterised by two submission #2. storey traditional shop front terraces - destroying the terraces and RSL between Belmont Rd and Gouldsbury St would contradict to this. Woolworths would put many local shop keepers out of business. Traffic, which is already excessive, would become intolerable. 104 5704402 Caroline Hare Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 105 5704470 Gabrielle Mosman Opposed to the development of a supermarket on Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ingate Junction Road due to traffic congestion and extra trucks and noise submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket in the area. Supermarkets at Bridgepoint and Mosman Junction service Mosman. We have many small shops as well, a Woolworths would destroy the village feel. 106 5704635 David Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Schmidt- Junction submission #2. Lindner supermarket (Mosman) 107 5704671 Annie Wicks Mosman Opposed to Woolworths because: Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction • Emotional health of us residents who have a connection submission #2. supermarket to Mosman Village. • It does not encourage a walking lifestyle. • Increased traffic and congestion on already congested roads. • No need – Mosman is already adequately serviced by supermarkets and smaller shops. • Impact on local shopkeepers. 108 5704898 Judith Mosman Object to Woolworths proposal as it would: Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Chapple Junction • Be detrimental to sense of community and village submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket atmosphere. • Increase traffic, congestion and create multiple traffic problems. • Force small shops to close, resulting in less people visiting Mosman Junction. • Be against community interests. Residents have not had adequate time to discuss proposal. Support council introducing planning controls to only allow small shops. 109 5704912 Ross & Mosman Object to the Woolworths development proposal as is at Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Joanne Junction odds with Council's LSPS. Planning priorities seek to submission #2. McMillan supermarket allow development that supports infrastructure and (Mosman) liveability. Already heavy traffic congestion, in particular on Military and Belmont Roads, will worsen. Council planning priorities should promote good outcomes for facilities and services. Existing
18
Page 70 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarkets in Mosman and smaller shops provide adequate levels of service locally, with alternatives in nearby suburbs. The current streetscape is sympathetic to the area's historic character and will be lost. Planning Priority 7 states the need to preserve scale and historic character on Military Road. High-rise residential/ commercial developments between Spit and Mosman Junctions will mar the quality of Military Rd. The Productivity priority focuses on access to, from and within Mosman. The Woolworths proposal can only exacerbate our village road network access issues. Encourage Council to limit or even prevent large retail stores like Woolworths from destroying this suburb. 110 5704992 Sarah Allsopp Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 111 5705030 Sally Guyatt Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 112 5705077 Dr. George Mosman Object to proposed Woolworths development because: Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Paul Junction • It is inconsistent with draft LSPS Priorities 2, 3, 6, 9, 12. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket • It would destroy local character and residential amenity with increased traffic and decrease local shop variety Supportive of Council changing planning controls to only allow small shops in Mosman Junction/Village. 113 5705210 Virginia Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Timmins Junction Small businesses have been lost to high rents - boutique submission #2. (Seaforth ) supermarket shops are being replaced by chain stores. The accessibility of public space and infrastructure should remain a focus for the council. The proposed Woolworths development would increase traffic/congestion and worsen accessibility. 114 5705309 Anne Powell Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 115 5705383 Louise Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Robinson and Junction submission #2. Murray Block supermarket (Undisclosed) 116 5705489 Damien Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Stenmark Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 117 5705490 Douglas Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Richardson Junction submission #2.
19
Page 71 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket 118 5705491 Dr Christine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Riordan Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 119 5705542 Wiliam and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Annette Junction submission #2. Watson supermarket (Mosman) 120 5705558 Joy Annand Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths proposal. It would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction disrupt the Mosman lifestyle, increase traffic and submission #2. supermarket congestion even further and impact adjacent property values. 121 5705679 Bruce Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Simpson Junction Traffic congestion on Saturday mornings and other submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket holiday periods which is severely impacting car parking. 122 5705680 Janice Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Simpson Junction Traffic congestion on Saturday mornings and other submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket holiday periods which is severely impacting car parking. 123 5705840 Michelle Mosman Totally opposed to the establishment of any supermarket, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Davenport Junction not just Woolworths, or any type of off-street "shopping submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket mall" style commercial entity in the Mosman Council area. Need to support local business and retain the gorgeous community feel of our village. 124 5705847 John Geismar Mosman Priority 9 - Strengthened “provide for opportunities for Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction local employment” by adding “…while protecting the submission #2. supermarket livelihoods of the owners and staff of existing enterprises, the life blood of a vigorous community.” Page 41 of Actions, local businesses would benefit by supplementing the statement “Consider the range of business activities …” per above recommendation. Concerns a Woolworths development in Mosman Junction would destroy the local community and result in further traffic chaos. 125 5705971 Mike & Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Barbara Junction submission #2. Hallett supermarket (Mosman) 126 5706335 Theresa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Crause Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 127 5706337 Claudia Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Crause Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 128 5706411 Victoria Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McEvoy Junction
20
Page 72 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket submission #2. 129 5706415 L Barber Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Many local shops have already closed down, council submission #2. supermarket needs to foster small businesses. 130 5706487 Robyn and Mosman Object to plans for a Woolworths on Military Rd. Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Alex Junction Rd is already congested and this will worsen. The submission #2. Macintosh supermarket development would be vacant and have quality issues (Undisclosed) due to poor high rise building standards. Mosman is unique in its village charm and is one of the few strip shops left. Development is not aligned with LSPS. 131 5706531 Ron Crause Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 132 5706791 Jane Button Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Moved to Mosman because of village atmosphere. submission #2. supermarket 133 5706792 Laura Collie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 134 5706793 Jim Slavin Mosman Support the Vision for Mosman and the inclusion of the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction principles/priorities- in particular Priority 6 - in Mosman’s submission #2. supermarket LSPS. Council's planning laws must limit the size of retail development in the Council’s commercially zoned areas to 500sqm. Opposed to the proposal by Woolworths for a major development on Military Rd. It would damage local identity, impact already congested traffic, damage the liveability of our village and conflict with priority 8. 135 5706794 Elizabeth Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Saadeh Junction Traffic is already at a standstill and will impact the submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket operations of the Fire Dept. 136 5706795 Margie and Mosman Very opposed to Woolworths inappropriate development, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Barry Figtree Junction due to loss of village atmosphere, traffic congestion. No submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket need for a giant supermarket in Mosman, access to more than enough already. Need small retail shops to stay in the village. 137 5706796 Regina Mosman Support the Woolworths development in Mosman. It will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Madden Junction add great value and easy shopping for people who live in submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket the area. 138 5706797 Joao Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Perestrello Junction It will destroy the village atmosphere and undermine submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket amenity because of increased traffic/parking congestion, and cause a reduction in the variety of shops. Mosman is adequately served by the medium size ones established in Mosman Junction and the smaller ones located in
21
Page 73 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Mosman Village. 139 5706798 Greg Kesby Mosman Strongly opposed to a large scale supermarket, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Woolworths or Coles, in Mosman Junction/Village. submission #2. supermarket Negative ramifications for Mosman’s character including dumped trolleys, traffic congestion, and decreased pedestrian safety. Mosman is already well serviced by shops and supermarkets. Supportive of council changing planning controls to only allow small local shops. 140 5706799 Danielle Mosman Object to having a Woolworths or Coles in the local area. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Wilkes Junction Mosman is unique and still has a local village feel, big submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket corporate supermarkets wipe out small local businesses. 141 5706800 Susan Linsen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 142 5706801 Rosslyn Devitt Mosman Object to Woolworths. Village would lose its appeal. Need Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction to limit development in Mosman submission #2. supermarket 143 5706802 Margie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bowen-Jones Junction Mosman is well serviced by supermarkets in nearby submission #2. and Ray supermarket suburbs. Smaller shops encourage personal interaction Rypma and community feeling. (Mosman) 144 5706803 Susie Barnes Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 145 5706805 Teresa Spiers Mosman Vehemently oppose any ‘proposal’ for a large-scale Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction development in Mosman, such as a Woolworths submission #2. supermarket development. It would not benefit the community and would create further ‘traffic chaos’, have negative implications on nearby schools and negatively impact the ambience and heritage of the area. 146 5707021 Gisela Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Wiliamson Junction Mosman is already losing local stores. The development submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket would overshadow the area and supermarkets at Spit Junction already service the area. 147 5707158 Curran Mosman Strongly object to the plan to allow Woolworths to come Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction to Mosman. The Village Atmosphere of Mosman will be submission #2. supermarket lost. Another store is not needed as there are 2 Woolworths stores nearby. 148 5707251 Fran Lester Mosman Agree with most of the aims and planning priorities (PPs) Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction of the draft LSPS, including PP 6 and 8. Opposed to the submission #2. supermarket proposed Woolworths supermarket on Military Rd, which offends these PPs. It would not respect Mosman’s heritage, would destroy the village atmosphere and
22
Page 74 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? unique shops, and increase traffic congestion. Supermarkets already adequately service Mosman. Support council changing planning controls to limit size of shops in Mosman. 149 5707295 Judy Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lockwood Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 150 5707318 Linda Gaffney Mosman Strongly oppose a large-scale development in Mosman, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction such as a Woolworths development, due to traffic and submission #2. supermarket congestions concerns, and for concerns of local school student safety. 151 5707688 Sarah Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Meredith and Junction submission #2. Family supermarket (Mosman) 152 5707697 Jane Luget Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 153 5707786 David Fayle Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 154 5707937 Julie Rust Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction The development conflicts with Planning Priority 6 as it submission #2. supermarket will not maintain the village atmosphere. 155 5708377 Kate McLeod Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 156 5708378 Brian Watters Housing Generally supportive of the draft MLSPS. Some concerns Within the draft LSPS, housing is addressed in No (Mosman) regarding preserving character. LSPS recognises the Planning Priorities 5 and 6, and heritage importance of maintaining historic amenity, however, conservation within Planning Priority 8. Council is failing to protect the renowned Federation Mosman Residential DCP 2012 identifies 22 period housing in R2 zones, eroding local character. townscape areas defined by neighbourhood LSPS should feedback to State planning instruments to character (this is comprised of a variety of ensure authority is given to Council’s DCP. Recommend elements including topography, landscape, additional action under planning priority 5 (e.g. streetscape, subdivision pattern and built form) “Undertake a review of Council’s LEP and DCP to ensure and heritage conservation areas (as identified that the local character of housing in Mosman is in the LEP). Each have specific building design maintained, and that the design of new houses is controls depending on their location and compatible with the surrounding character”). character. Action 2 of PP2 is to consider the approaches for integrating local character into land use planning outlined in the NSW Government’s Local Character and Place Guideline (Feb 2019), and review existing townscape
23
Page 75 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? statements in the DCPs. 157 5708386 Benoble Open Space & Plan should mention climate change and the need for Refer to response to submission #39. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Sustainability council to cut its and the community's carbon emissions. submission #39. 158 5708458 Suzanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Fayle Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 159 5708510 Clair Carry Mosman Support the Vision for Mosman and Planning Priorities Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction (i.e. Priority 6). Opposed to the Woolworths Proposal on submission #2. supermarket Military Rd. It would have a negative impact on Mosman’s identity, traffic and congestion, and liveability of Mosman. It conflicts Planning Priority 8. Supportive of Council changing planning policies to limit the size of retail development in commercially zoned areas. 160 5708511 J F Slavin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction The proposal is inconsistent with LSPS planning submission #2. supermarket priorities. 161 5708512 Anthony & Mosman Object to the possible development of a major mixed-use Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Margaret Gall Junction complex and car park on Military Rd. The site is not submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket identified as an area for the focus of future housing growth (p.27 LSPS). Such a development would not be in keeping with the village architecture and atmosphere and would destroy the local character of Mosman. Significant traffic and congestion would be added to already congested roads. Many local shops would be driven out of business. Strongly support limiting the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. 162 5708596 Maggie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jackson Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 163 5709246 Colleen Hayes Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 164 5709319 Emily Woog Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 165 5709484 Grant Larsen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 166 5709488 Derek Parker Mosman Strongly object to the idea of a large Woolworths store on Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction or near the present site of the Mosman Club on multiple submission #2. supermarket grounds, in particular additional traffic and destruction of atmosphere. The large stores at Spit Junction service the area. 167 5709511 Christine Mosman Opposed to building a Woolworths in Mosman, it will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
24
Page 76 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Crabb Junction change the beautiful village and cause traffic chaos. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 168 5709559 Denise Di Mosman Against the Woolworths project. Would like to maintain Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Iasio Junction the village feel and support small businesses. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 169 5709589 Serena Mosman Against the Woolworths development, due to the impacts Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Citarella Junction on the village feel and on small local businesses. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 170 5709637 Lanning Mosman Object to potential plans for a Woolworths development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bennett Junction Mosman as it would increase traffic and congestion and submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket ruin the village atmosphere. 171 5709654 Jane Mosman Oppose the discussed Woolworths in Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dampney Junction Increased traffic will be dangerous for the two nearby submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket schools. The location is unsuitable for the large delivery trucks. Small local shops make Mosman such a special place and build a strong community bond. Put Woolworths up on Spit road in the old Movie theatre space. 172 5709655 Linda Bergin Other Location of Harbour Trust and SHNP land should be The Sydney Harbour Federation Trust and Yes – The Location Map OAM made more clear on overview map. Sydney Harbour National Park occupy and Structure Plan have (Undisclosed) substantial land within Mosman. These lands been revised to more clearly are identified on the Location Map and identify these lands. Structure Plan. 173 5709658 Kirsten Danse Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 174 5709753 Georgina Mosman Woolworths in the Village would be a disaster destroying Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction the heart of Mosman and the local shops in the village. submission #2. supermarket Woolworths already serves the area, but they seem to want to swallow up local retailers. Traffic is more important as the amount of cars on Belmont Road and surrounds is already increasing. 175 5709754 Price M Mosman Very concerned that Woolworths in Mosman will disrupt Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction and change our village. We have enviable shopping in submission #2. supermarket Mosman and it would be taken away. Military Road is already a very busy street, any busier people would shop elsewhere. 176 5709755 Deborah Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Reynolds Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 177 5709851 Humberto Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gonzalez Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 178 5709852 Zulma Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
25
Page 77 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Gonzalez Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 179 5709907 Elisabeth Mosman Strongly object to a Woolworths or any large chain store Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Clough Junction being introduced into Mosman. A large supermarket like submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Woolworths will destroy our upmarket, village feel , as well as add to the already congested traffic. 180 5709987 Dianne Moore Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 181 5710008 Glen Sewell Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 182 5710019 Clare Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Stockdale Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 183 5710076 Sue Mosman Protecting the character and amenity of Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Henderson Junction Very concerned about a Woolworths on Military Rd submission #2. Smart supermarket increased traffic and congestion, loss of character and (Undisclosed) village atmosphere and lack of parking. Mosman has ample shopping already. The community values the low- rise development, parks and open space in Mosman. 184 5710162 Patricia Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths development around the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Tucker Junction Mosman Club on Military Rd, due to traffic and parking submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket impacts, impact of local character and village atmosphere, and loss of small local businesses. 185 5710441 Susan Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Sherbon Junction Mosman is already well served by near-by supermarkets, submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket a Woolworths would be to the detriment of local stores and local character. 186 5710442 Tim Foote Housing Greatest 20 year planning opportunity is the ability to Housing capacity modelling undertaken in 2017 No (Mosman) meet demand for low-maintenance medium density found that there is the capacity for at least homes. Council states there is sufficient potential in 1,886 additional dwellings within existing current zoning, however, this does not factor in reluctance business and medium density zones of MLEP of owners to sell or redevelop. Supply doesn’t meet 2012, more than sufficient to meet Mosman’s demand under current zoning. Encourage addressing this current dwelling targets of 300 additional issue with greater density zoning and development dwellings by July 2021, and for a similar target standards around transport, village amenities and for the next five-year period. This issue will be Balmoral Beach. addressed in further detail in Mosman’s local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 187 5710443 Peter Mosman Object to proposed Woolworths development because it Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Blackband Junction would destroy local character, atmosphere and residential submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket amenity with increased traffic/congestion and decrease local shop variety, would impact on the nearby schools and would restrict access to local facilities such as Allan
26
Page 78 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Border Oval. There are no benefits for such a change to occur and must not be approved. 188 5710444 Kaye (Lynne) Mosman Distressed about the proposed Woolworths development Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Alan Junction in Mosman. It is inappropriate for an area struggling with submission #2. Phillips supermarket traffic congestion, out of character with the 'High Street' (Mosman) feel with strip shopping and local shopkeepers. Residents are well catered for with supermarkets in Mosman and surrounding suburbs. 189 5710445 Susanne Mosman Object to Woolworths development intention in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Wadey Junction Village as they are not acting in the community’s interest, submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket will send small shops out of business, will threaten the safety of school children and pedestrians, and increase traffic and congestion. 190 5710446 James Hall Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths would destroy the high street and losing the submission #2. supermarket RSL club would be disappointing. 191 5710447 Rick Jenkins Mosman Not opposed to a large-scale supermarket, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Woolworths, in Mosman Junction/Village in a controlled submission #2. supermarket and managed way. A large-scale retail outlet will enhance the local character and improve residential amenity. The additional car parking will be welcomed. Existing shops in Mosman are expensive and have second rate service. Driving to supermarkets outside of Mosman can take 40 minutes during congestion. 192 5710448 Ian Jamieson Mosman Opposed to a large national supermarket chain in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Village (e.g. Woolworths or Coles) as it would submission #2. supermarket destroy village amenity. Support Council implementing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Village. 193 5710449 Belinda Mosman Strongly oppose a large company ( Woolworths Pty Ltd) Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Macartney Junction undertaking a large- Scale development near two local submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket schools. Large development in our local area is preposterous. Traffic on Military Rd is already too congested to consider an additional major development. Children and elderly safety should be a priority. 194 5710450 Ivan Rajkovic Mosman Strongly object to allowing Woolworths to set up in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman and destroy small businesses and the village submission #2. supermarket feeling. Roads will not be able to cope with increased traffic and it would be very detrimental to the village environment and feel. Woolworths is unnecessary as there are large supermarkets within a short distance of Mosman. 195 5710451 Colin Wilson- Mosman We are strongly opposed to Woolworths building a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Brown Junction supermarket in Mosman. It will ruin the village character, submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket put long established independent retailers out of
27
Page 79 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? business, destroy the Mosman Club, increase traffic congestion and put further strain on parking. There are adequate supermarkets in Mosman and nearby 196 5710452 Andrew Mills Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Already have many supermarkets serving the area. The submission #2. supermarket character of Mosman would be destroyed as would local businesses. 197 5710453 Jocelyn Mosman Object to Woolworths plans for Mosman Village. It would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pollard Junction spoil the atmosphere and appeal of the unique submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket streetscape, bring more traffic and congestion, be dangerous for school children and be noisy during construction. Support changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in the village. 198 5710454 Ross-Smith Mosman Vehemently opposed to the allowance of large scale retail Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Family Junction development (such as a Woolworths) in the lower Military submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket Rd shopping precinct. It would destroy small local retailers that make the village. The traffic, noise, loss of visual and village amenity would be untenable (comparable to the impact of the Avenue Rd BP). Military Rd at Gouldsbury St is already heavily congested. 199 5710455 Kathryn Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pearson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 200 5710456 Jeff and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lynda Estok Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 201 5710457 MLK Mosman Oppose the Woolworths development. Already have three Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction supermarkets in Spit Junction. Woolworths will destroy submission #2. supermarket the current small businesses that we have. We have enough Woolworths in Neutral Bay. The large delivery trucks are not suitable either. 202 5710458 ecraike001 Mosman Writing to fully oppose the entry of Woolworths in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman due to traffic congestion impacts and to protect submission #2. supermarket our existing small businesses and the charm and character of our village. There is no need for further grocery stores in Mosman. 203 5710459 Helen Turner Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 204 5710460 Ian & Barbara Mosman Support restricting the size of retail outlets. Very opposed Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jackson Junction to a proposed Woolworth Development in Mosman submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Village due to increased traffic, the impact on local, small businesses and general destruction of the streetscape. We are well served by the existing retailers and have no need. The unique ‘village feel’ of Mosman would be
28
Page 80 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? destroyed. 205 5710461 Hua Wang Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Like the local shops and living environment currently in submission #2. supermarket Mosman, it is what makes it unique. 206 5710463 Rodrigo Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 207 5710464 Regine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Chapman- Junction It would destroy local character, destroy the unique strip submission #2. Davies supermarket shopping and undermine residential amenity with (Mosman) increased traffic congestion and a reduction in the variety of shops. 208 5710465 Diana Hollway Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction The village feel and federation facades would be submission #2. supermarket affected. Traffic would be chaotic in the surrounding areas. The area is unique and a large supermarket would be generic. 209 5710466 Claire Pollock Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction It will ruin the existing residential vibe, increase traffic on submission #2. supermarket an already busy Military Road and reduce the number and variety of local independent retailers. 210 5710467 Anthony Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Chapman- Junction Would irreversibly detract from the exquisite strip submission #2. Davies supermarket shopping that enhances the village atmosphere. Council (Mosman) should look to inner Melbourne suburbs which have embraced strip shopping heritage 211 5710468 Colin Payne Mosman Object to the proposed Woolworths Supermarket and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction associated development at Mosman Junction. It would submission #2. supermarket change dramatically the village feel, generate unacceptable traffic volumes, have a severely detrimental effect on various existing businesses and be highly disruptive during the construction period. It isn't necessary, as we are already provided with sufficient local supermarkets. 212 5710469 Ross Tilly Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Support PP6 and the related action is that Council is to submission #2. supermarket 'Consider planning controls for neighbourhood centres to ensure the village atmosphere is maintained." Woolworths is inconsistent with the action. 213 5710470 August Kovse Mosman Object to the potential Woolworths development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman. Mosman is already so well served by submission #2. supermarket supermarkets and smaller stores in Mosman and surrounding suburbs. It would put smaller businesses
29
Page 81 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (which are better for the community) out of business. It would not enhance Mosman. 214 5710471 Susan and Mosman Mosman is a unique, beautiful suburb and we feel Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Michael Junction extremely privileged to live here. Strongly oppose the submission #2. O’Hara supermarket proposal for a Woolworths Development in Mosman due (Undisclosed) to the disruption, the destruction of old buildings, the traffic congestion (which is already a major issue), the safety of children and elderly residents. Mosman is well serviced by supermarkets within the area. 215 5710472 Jo-Ann De Mosman Strongly object to the proposal of Woolworths in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lorenzo Junction as this will destroy our Village atmosphere, more traffic submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket (especially delivery trucks) would be disastrous. Locals will not support it, but will continue to support small retailers. 216 5710473 W. Beach Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thomas Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 217 5710474 Laura Will Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 218 5710475 Soren Lunoe Mosman Opposed to another supermarket in Mosman. Shopping is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction well catered for, density level is already excessive, submission #2. supermarket parking is no longer possible. The small shop charm of Mosman Village should be maintained. Housing Council should focus on increasing operating efficiency Mosman’s population growth over the next 20 No and contain the total population to current numbers. years is projected to be minimal, at around 0.3% per year, or an additional 2,035 people between 2016 to 2036. Refer to response to submission #186. 219 5710498 John and Lisa Mosman Strongly oppose the planned Woolworths development. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bennett Junction Concerns regarding loss of village atmosphere. Mosman submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket is well serviced by supermarkets within and nearby the suburb. 220 5710628 Peter and Mosman Vehemently oppose any Woolworths, or similar Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Marlene Allen Junction development, in Military Road. It would cause traffic submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket chaos on already overcrowded roads and destroy the local character, charm and liveability. Council has an obligation to preserve what we have for both current and future generations. 221 5710637 James Collier Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 222 5710638 Luigina Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ferlaino Junction submission #2.
30
Page 82 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket 223 5710640 Bo Zhang Mosman No to Woolworths in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 224 5710643 Bo Zhang Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 225 5710650 Kerrie Nichols Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 226 5710652 Ann McLeod Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 227 5710653 John and Dale Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Harkness Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 228 5710654 Phillipa Mosman Opposed to potential Woolworths Development due to too Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McLachlan Junction much traffic, too big a building, too many shops (already submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket many empty in Mosman) etc. Choice magazine lists Woolworths as second worst supermarket chain, Mosman has an excellent supply of supermarkets, no need for Woolworths. 229 5710663 Frank Sellam Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 230 5710678 Margaret Mosman Strongly object to any proposal for Woolworths to be Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction located in Mosman Village. The traffic situation into and submission #2. supermarket out of the area will only increase. Mosman is serviced well by supermarkets within and surrounding the suburb. 231 5710679 Wayne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jorgensen Junction Adequately serviced by supermarkets within and nearby submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Mosman. It is incompatible with the character and existing stores. Small stores are more in character and adequately service needs. 232 5710686 Robert Dolk Mosman Protect the heritage and low-rise street fronts of Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Village and restrict nearby development that would submission #2. supermarket increase traffic through the precinct. Bridgepoint should be maintained as the primary large-scale retail precinct, and the council chambers site redeveloped to accommodate the planned Woolworths and new council facilities. Block the proposed Woolworths development in Mosman Village in light of this. Open Space & Liaise with RMS to replace a proportion of private boat Planning Priority 14 addresses land and water- Yes – Planning Priority 14 Sustainability moorings with hire boat moorings to increase public based recreation. Action 5 is to collaborate with has been expanded to
31
Page 83 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? access to boating. Price waste collection to fund real the RMS, adjoining Councils and local address water-based recycling rather than dumping by garbage collectors. businesses to ensure the sustainable recreation, and collaboration Liaise with the Harbour Trust to use unused buildings in management of water-based recreation, and opportunities with RMS, Middle Head for not for profit services/not for profit maintain accessibility. SHFT and NPWS. workspaces. Buildings are disused and in disrepair. Action 4 is to collaborate with the SHFT and NPWS to ensure coordinated outcomes for recreational spaces at Middle and Georges Heads. Traffic & Study the impact of driverless cars on road design and Planning Priority 9 identifies many Council Yes – Content within Transport include learnings into new design criteria e.g. jay walking, initiatives in transport, noting that there is likely Planning Priority 9 has been parking, pedestrian crossings. Plan for the increase to be further improvement in this space over revised to improve clarity, demand for vehicle electric charging in commercial retail the next few years with the potential for identify a broad range of parking bays, private parking (requires electrical autonomous vehicles and further expansion of initiatives in transport, and upgrades of residences), on street charging. the share economy. Action 2 of PP9 is to reference the Active Further increase cycle paths proposed with a cycle path provide a regulatory framework that facilitates Transport Strategy to be from Mosman Bay to Cremorne Junction. Upgrade the flexibility to provide for changes in transport prepared. main pathways so that they are not only suitable for technologies such as share bikes, e-scooters, recreation but also for commuting - i.e. not muddy. car sharing and ultimately autonomous vehicles, that ensures maximum benefit to the community. Mosman has a number of scenic and well graded cycling routes, including a regional route linking Mosman to North Sydney and Manly. Action 3 of PP9 is to prepare and implement an Active Transport Strategy for Mosman that outlines Council’s strategic direction for cycling and walking, and connection with public transport. Housing Prevent developers using of existing unit building bulk, Planning Priority 6 is to ensure that building No siting and density controls to circumvent the rules that design and construction is of high quality, and would normally apply to new developments maintains resident amenity. Action 1 is to consider planning controls within MLEP 2012 and DCPs to ensure high quality construction and design. Heritage Fund the protection of heritage through the courts. Refer to response to submission #12. Refer to response to submission #12. 233 5710726 Tony Mosman Against monolithic retail, residential or industrial Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Vanderbent Junction development in Mosman. Concerns over political and submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket financial influence allowing such development. Council should consider a local referendum on the issue to ensure community wishes are not lost to vested interests. 234 5710781 Gary Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thompson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 235 5710828 Susan Talty Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
32
Page 84 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 236 5710829 Penny Robins Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. Traffic has already Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction increased recently, would be dreadful with proposed submission #2. supermarket Woolworths. 237 5710830 J.M.N Rolfe Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in the heart of Mosman, it would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction create more traffic and spoil local shops and atmosphere. submission #2. supermarket 238 5710844 Margaret Mosman People choose to live in Mosman because of 'village' Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to North Junction atmosphere. Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman Village submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket due to increased traffic, loss of local businesses and loss of character. 239 5710850 Karla Pincott Mosman Concerns over a major supermarket chain establishing a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction megastore in Mosman Village as it is out of character for submission #2. supermarket Mosman Village, would not benefit residents who are already well serviced, would add more traffic and create parking issues. 240 5710851 Stephanie Mosman Object to any proposal by Woolworths for development of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McCoy Junction the block of Belmont, Gouldsbury and Military Rd based submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket on the impact of increased traffic that would occur from shoppers and delivery trucks. The road networks are already congested in this area. Such development would be better suited to Spit Junction. Encourage Council to implement such planning laws that maintain our unique character. 241 5710858 Andrew and Mosman Strongly object to any development by Woolworths as it Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Anna Bird Junction would contradict most LSPS objectives, including submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket maintaining the village character of Mosman, supporting development with infrastructure, dealing with traffic congestion and concentrating commercial activity at Spit Junction. It would be the demise of more shops in the Village and lead to vacancies. Mosman is adequately serviced by nearby supermarkets and there is not forecast to be more population growth therefore no desire for a large supermarket in Mosman Village. 242 5710859 Kim and Rose Mosman Not opposed to a large-scale supermarket, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Freeman Junction Woolworths, in Mosman Junction/Village. It would not submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket adversely affect the local character or residential amenity. Traffic congestion could be ameliorated by careful traffic and parking planning. It is not reasonable to assume it would reduce shops. It would create a competitive shopping environment for residents. Do not support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. 243 5710928 Peter Mosman Planning controls must keep Mosman Village as it Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
33
Page 85 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Chegwyn Junction currently is and never allow major retail developments. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket Traffic is already a problem and any large developments would aggravate an already difficult traffic problem. 244 5711095 Chelsea Chen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 245 5711096 Kria Coleman Mosman Noticed a significant deterioration in the village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction atmosphere and the accessibility of the amenities. The submission #2. supermarket closure of small independent businesses has reduced use of the main shopping area and exacerbates issues for the remaining businesses. Another contributing factor is the traffic congestion. Council should revise planning controls to limit the size of retail premises along Military Rd. There are enough large retail options. Council needs to find ways to reverse the deterioration. 246 5711097 Brenda Mercia Mosman Strongly against the large scale Woolworths supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction in Mosman Village/Junction as it will worsen already bad submission #2. supermarket traffic on Military Rd, increase traffic noise impacting on outdoor dining, take away the village atmosphere and result in the closure of other nearby shops. Not needed as there is Woolworths in Neutral Bay. 247 5711098 Chris Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Herrington Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 248 5711099 Jane Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 249 5711100 Robam Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 250 5711101 Ellen Rees Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 251 5711102 Ruth Dickison Mosman Very opposed to any large supermarket being built in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Junction . There is already an IGA in the village, submission #2. supermarket another IGA and Aldi at Spit Junction and 2 Woolworths supermarkets in Neutral Bay. We do not need another. 252 5711103 Bianka Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Demets Junction The breadth of small retailers makes Mosman Village submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket unique, bringing diversity and interest to our community. Need to look after small retailers and encourage new ones. Residents have plenty of supermarket options, no need for yet another large supermarket. 253 5711104 John and Mosman Woolworths are not ethical and only shows appreciation Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
34
Page 86 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Sandra Allen Junction of its financial profit. The Woolworths development would submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket not get the subtleties of the Mosman ethos. Opposed to Woolworths development due to loss of community amenity, detriment to established heritage, abuse of dominant position, inappropriate proximity to Mosman High School, impossible traffic disruption during and after construction phase, etc. 254 5711105 Stephanie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to King Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 255 5711106 Odile Mosman Strongly object to the proposal of overdevelopment for Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Chautard Junction Woolworth in Mosman. It will destroy the community and submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket village atmosphere. 256 5711107 Thomas Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Nicholas Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 257 5711108 Barbara Mosman Strongly opposed a large-scale supermarket in the area Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McGilvray Junction of Mosman/Mosman Village. It would destroy village submission #2. OAM supermarket character, add immensely to the traffic congestion which (Undisclosed) is already a significant problem, destroy many small traders. Mosman residents are already well served by supermarkets in Mosman and nearby. Support Council changing planning controls to enable a restriction on the size of retail premises. 258 5711109 Daniel J Housing In 2036 only 75% of the population will still live in Council is required to prepare the draft LSPS Yes – New paragraphs Graham PSM Mosman, care needs to be taken to account for future with a 20 year vision, however to review it included in Planning Priority (Mosman) residents when setting such long-term visions. Strategy every seven years. 5 about the diversity of does not address issue of empty-nesters and downsizers. Planning Priority 5 addresses Mosman’s housing supporting Council needs to ensure there is sufficient capacity in housing diversity, ageing population, and Mosman’s older population retirement facilities and address the need for preventative ageing in place. Planning Priority 3 addresses health programs. community service and facilities available to support Mosman’s population. Other Mosman support services operated by volunteers, what is Council delivers a wide range of support No the plan to ensure adequate services that account for services for children, families, young people, increased demand? older residents, and those with a disability in Need to ensure that people with limited mobility are Mosman. Services are regularly reviewed to planned for with footpaths and crossing that are mobility ensure demand is met. See Planning Priority 3. friendly. Council is guided by accessibility audits and Mosman High School relies on 600 enrolments outside strategy, including the Disability Inclusion the municipality. Concerns that if the school becomes Action Plan and Pedestrian Access Mobility more dependent on external enrolments it would be Plan, to ensure good access within Mosman. targeted for State Govt. asset recycling. See Planning Priority 9. Issues associated with the municipality’s school aged The future of Mosman High School is a matter children is not adequately covered in the strategy for the NSW Government. The NSW statement. Department of Education and Training (DET)
35
Page 87 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? has advised of a major infrastructure project at Mosman High School that will include new core facilities, upgraded classrooms, removal of demountables and air conditioned facilities. This project is currently within the planning stage of its lifecycle. In regards to children, the draft LSPS notes the services and facilities available in Mosman (schools, child care, youth centre, playgrounds etc). Planning Priorities 1, 3 and 14 relate to planning for infrastructure, community services and facilities, playgrounds and open space. Advice from DET is that there is currently sufficient accommodation capacity in Mosman’s public schools to meet local enrolment demand, and it will continue to monitor this. Open Space & Make renewable energy an active component of the plan. Refer to response to submission #39 and #232. Refer to response to Sustainability Council could install solar panels of the roof of the council submission #39 and #232. chambers and depot. Proactively support electric cars by installing charging stations in the Bridgepoint and Vista Street carparks. Mosman A 500 square metre cap on floor space seems naive. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction Existing retailers such as Aldi, Harris Farms and IGA submission #2. supermarket would fall foul of the new guideline and would not have been able to establish at Bridgepoint. Council could propose mitigating measures to Woolworths development, such as period-style designing or retaining facades, containment of retail floorspace size to a commercially viable area, limit the car park size to prevent gridlock. Concept of village may be used incorrectly in the plan. It is difficult to define what the village concept entails and how will it be supported in the future when the closest village precinct would be the Mosman Civic Centre area. Traffic & Council needs to prepare for opening of Beaches Tunnel. Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport Number of vehicles crossing the Spit Bridge will reduce submission #3. from 64,000 to 30,000. Less lanes of traffic needed. Opportunity to improve accessibility, relinquish clearways and no right turns, create more kerbside parking and improve cycle lanes. 259 5712668 Suzanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Whitworth Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 260 5711160 Craig Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Whitworth Junction submission #2.
36
Page 88 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket 261 5711218 Marianne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Rajkovic Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 262 5711219 Peter Carre, Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lesley Carre, Junction Also opposed as the development would have a negative submission #2. Jamie Carre, supermarket impact on property values and as it would remove Angus Carre competitive retail environment. (Mosman) 263 5711237 McInnes100 Mosman Object to any development by Woolworths in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Village submission #2. supermarket 264 5711277 Jan Colgan Mosman Great concern at the proposed Woolworths store and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction accompanying development on Military Road. Issues submission #2. supermarket include increased traffic, loss of ambience, and destruction of unique historic architecture. Mosman has enough supermarkets nearby and existing shops are unique and adequate. 265 5711295 Peter Twiney Other The language in the report is vague and insufficiently Planning Priority 2 focuses on collaboration – Yes – Existing and future (Undisclosed) positive. Council needs to lead and be positive about with NSW Government agencies, Northern collaboration opportunities innovating rules and ways of managing the future. Sydney Council, NSROC and others. are noted throughout the Working closely with NSROC and North Sydney Council Collaboration opportunities are noted within draft LSPS. should help more integration of planning. Major problems actions throughout the draft LSPS. in Mosman include poor relationship with State Government. Traffic & Major problems in Mosman include traffic/parking. Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport Council needs to create detailed plans/studies for submission #3. changes to Military Road as input to the Beaches Link Tunnel EIS. Need to protect local bus services, as express services are likely to use the tunnel Heritage Major problems in Mosman include creeping Refer to response to submission #12. Refer to response to unsympathetic development, and loss of heritage submission #12. streetscapes. Mosman Major problems in Mosman include potential major Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction retailing developments. Support limiting the size of new submission #2. supermarket retail premises in Mosman Junction 266 5711296 Gordon Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ormiston Junction Would involve closure of local shops that bring submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket ambiance. Mosman is adequately serviced by supermarkets and small shops. 267 5711297 Gwen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ormiston Junction Would involve closure of local shops that bring submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket ambiance. Mosman is adequately serviced by
37
Page 89 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarkets and small shops. 268 5711352 Murray Mosman Object to the proposed Woolworth development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman. submission #2. supermarket Heritage Old building in the carpark behind RSL is the Old Horse This land forms part of the Military Road No Stable dating from 1870 and formerly part of the Lennon Heritage Conservation Area, identified within Estate. This building may be Heritage listed if not, MLEP 2012, but is not a heritage listed item. suggest you do so promptly. Any development on such land would be subject to planning controls of Clause 5.10 Heritage Conservation of MLEP 2012. 269 5711360 Kenny Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Douglas Junction Has the point of monopolising the area been considered? submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket Woolworths have 2 stores in the area. Large scale single brand shopping options are detrimental to surrounding small businesses 270 5711373 Dr Jane Hart Mosman Oppose the potential Woolworths development on Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Rd. It would damage most local businesses in the village submission #2. supermarket and increase traffic congestion. Support changing planning controls to limit the size of retail development. 271 5711397 Littsp Mosman Against any proposed Woolworths store in Military Rd. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction For local environment and retention of Mosman village submission #2. supermarket feel. Far better to redevelop Bridgepoint with underground access and parking to both sides of Military Rd. Leave Mosman Village as is. 272 5711418 Juauriemo Mosman Opposed to Woolworths on Military Rd. It will ruin the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction character of this charming street and ruin local business. submission #2. supermarket It will increase traffic which is already chaotic. 273 5711427 Ana Julia Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Auriemo Junction submission #2. Durney supermarket (Mosman) 274 5711436 Kate Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Mitchelhill Junction Mosman is already adequately serviced by supermarkets submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket within and nearby the suburb. 275 5711446 Bruce Atkins Mosman Strongly oppose the proposed Woolworth development. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction will destroy the village atmosphere and there are enough submission #2. supermarket supermarkets already. 276 5711455 Andrew Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Robinson Junction Support Council maintaining its planning controls so that submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket it can protect and maintain the existing character of our local areas and fight off pressure for inappropriate large- scale development. 277 5711524 Graham Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
38
Page 90 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Colliss Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 278 5711604 Barbara Mosman Object to potential Woolworths development in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pearson Junction Village. No need as Mosman is adequately covered both submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket in the Mosman Village and Spit Junction and Woolworths has two stores in Neutral Bay. It would introduce huge trucks causing more congestion and destroy the ambience of the area and future prospects of some of the businesses. 279 5711630 Susan Mosman Object to the overdevelopment of Mosman, such as the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kristensen Junction proposed Woolworths at Mosman Junction. Concerns submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket include loss of village feel, traffic chaos, loss of sense of community. Mosman is already well serviced by supermarkets, there is no need for another. 280 5711662 Olivier Hoarau Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction A large scale retailer will be highly detrimental to the submission #2. supermarket community feel of Mosman, would be completely out of character and would add financial stress on existing small retailers. Mosman has enough offerings in Mosman and in proximity of Neutral Bay (2 x Woolworths 1 x Coles). 281 5711673 Ken Clifton Mosman Opposed to a large scale supermarket such as Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Woolworths in Mosman Junction. It will destroy local submission #2. supermarket character and increase traffic congestion. 282 5711674 Victor Koshka Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Cremorne) Junction submission #2. supermarket 283 5711739 Kaye Brooks Mosman Opposed to Woolworths Development, as it will destroy Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction what we love most about Mosman Village. The extra submission #2. supermarket traffic and delivery trucks will endanger school children, congest local streets and produce noise, dust and fumes that filter into homes. It would drive small shops out of business, reducing choice and destroy the village atmosphere. 284 5711740 Kate Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Charlesworth Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 285 5711741 Carolyn Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pridham Junction Very Concerned they are buying up blocks to submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket amalgamate. Such a development would go against Planning Priority 6 and would not maintain village atmosphere. Mosman is already serviced by small shops and supermarkets at Bridgepoint. 286 5711742 Rebecca Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
39
Page 91 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Cook Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 287 5711743 Michael Rees Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 288 5711744 Gillian Jones Mosman Object to Woolworths, want to retain small local shops, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Village does not need Woolworths. submission #2. supermarket 289 5711745 Margaret Mills Mosman Opposed to the proposed development for Woolworths Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction retail store. The proposal will completely destroy the submission #2. supermarket ambiance of Mosman village life. Small business would be swamped and traffic congestion would be worse than ever. 290 5711746 Peter Williams Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 291 5711748 Anthea Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Piddington Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 292 5711749 Mosman Traffic & Support the vision that “Sustainable transport, such as Planning Priority 9 (was 8) has been revised to Yes – Amendments to Active Transport buses, ferries, cycling and walking will be encouraged for better respond to Council’s active transport and Planning Priority 9 to Transport a healthy, active community”. other initiatives, and emerging technologies. improve clarity, identify Working Planning Priority 8 – Support the statement but it is not Refer to response to submission #232. collaboration and refer to Group followed up by actions that encourage active transport. New Planning Priority 10 has been included to the Active Transport Recommend actions expanded to include: respond to the Western Harbour Tunnel and Strategy. - planning for Spit-Military Rd post Beaches Link, Beaches Link and opportunities that this may New Planning Priority 10 - implementing Mosman Bike Plan and PAMP, bring to Mosman. Refer to response to included re the Western - developing an integrated transport and land use plan, submission #3. Harbour Tunnel and - provide a framework covering new and emerging Local and regional cycling routes are shown on Beaches Link. transport technologies, the revised Structure Plan and Location Map. The Location Map and - ensure planning control consistent with Council’s Structure Plan are revised to Access Strategy and indicate cycling routes. - identify public walk routes accessed via private land. Recommend modifications to the maps on page 21 and 27 to show regional bicycle routes and some local routes. Open Space & Planning Priority 12 - Support the action “Improve Planning Priority 14 relates to land and water- Yes – Additional content sustainability bushland walking tracks…”. Recommend further action: based recreation in Mosman. The PP added to Planning Priority In collaboration with National Parks and The Federation references the Greater Sydney Green Grid 14 re walking tracks and Trust, upgrade existing and develop new green links projects identified within Mosman (harbour collaboration between open spaces walking tracks). Action 2 is to ensure improved Planning Priority 14 - Suggest adding action: Review accessibility to open spaces, and Action 3 is to Council’s street tree policies to ensure species specified improve bushland walking tracks in can survive climatic conditions and ensure that in mid- collaboration with the SHFT, NPWS and Summer every street in Mosman has at least one adjacent councils.
40
Page 92 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? footpath that is mostly in shade. The importance of maintaining Mosman’s tree canopy is reflected in Planning Priorities 4, 12, 13 and 16 in particular, as it contributes to healthy built environments, habitat links, scenic amenity, reducing the urban heat island effect, providing shade and so on. Tree planting in Mosman is managed under Council’s Street Tree Masterplan, and Urban Forest Management Policy. 293 5711798 Jacqueline Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Naher Junction Bridgepoint and Neutral Bay adequately service Mosman submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket residents. 294 5711870 Glen Bowden Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 295 5711877 Tom Power Mosman Object to planned Woolworths on Military Rd. Priorities 5, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction 6, 7, 8 and 13 are all impacted with this proposed submission #2. supermarket development. Mosman does not need the extra traffic, congestion, industrial food waste and collection, energy resources and overall eyesore. 296 5712018 Toni Heath Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction We are already serviced by large supermarkets in Spit submission #2. supermarket Junction, Cremorne and Neutral Bay. Concerned over risk to elderly and school children who use our Junction every day. 297 5712019 John and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Leonie Wright Junction Biggest concern is the traffic congestion and parking that submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket is already appalling around Mosman Village, needs to be addressed regardless of further development. 298 5712020 Jennifer Willis Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman already has enough supermarkets at Spit submission #2. supermarket Junction as well as a small IGA supermarket in Mosman Village. Traffic through Mosman, particularly at weekends is a nightmare at times. 299 5712021 Suzanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Percival Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 300 5712022 Nestor Mosman Concerned at the possibility of a Woolworths supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hinzack Junction on Military Rd. Site is unsuitable for a development of this submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket type or scale as it practically adjoins a senior school, a primary school and other sensitive uses. It would exacerbate the poor traffic on Military Rd and delivery truck access would be extremely dangerous. It would destroy the Mosman atmosphere and existing retail small
41
Page 93 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? businesses. 301 5712025 Ken and Mary Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hillier Junction It will increase traffic from commercial suppliers and submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket customers on an already troubled local road network and on adjacent residential streets. It will also result in many of the local retail stores closing and completely alter the character of Mosman Village. No need for a large supermarket in Mosman Village, which is already well served with supermarkets within Mosman and in nearby suburbs. 302 5712080 Vivienne Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths development. Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Degenhardt Junction is well serviced with 3 supermarkets and there is no need submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket for anymore. It would destroy the village shops which are a part of Mosman community. Traffic in and out of Mosman, which is already heavy, would be made chaotic, air quality would be adversely affected. 303 5712082 PFCrane Mosman Support priorities 6 and 7. Any large development or Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction megastore would immediately destroy the important submission #2. supermarket heritage and village atmosphere that presently exists in Mosman. Urge Council to adopt Planning Controls to maintain the amenities that exist today. 304 5712084 Allison Hart Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 305 5712087 Rick Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths proposal as it will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Munnings Junction cause traffic chaos in Military Rd and severely affect the submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket visual amenity of Mosman Village. 306 5712088 Jacobus Klein Mosman Against the plans to establish a Woolworths supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction in Mosman Village. Do not need another supermarket, it submission #2. supermarket would destroy the beautiful character of Mosman Village, the extra traffic would be horrendous and it would kill local small businesses in the area. 307 5712089 Hilary Mosman Totally opposed to a Woolworths on Military Rd. Already Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Caldwell Junction seen the demise of milk bars, owner butchers and friendly submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket faces. A mega store will result in loss of village atmosphere and increase traffic on an already congested Military Rd. 308 5712110 Anne Mosman Strongly opposed to allowing a large scale development Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Johnson-Berry Junction such as Woolworths in Mosman. Increased congestion on submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket already busy roads would impact small businesses. Mosman is already very well serviced with large supermarkets. This sort of development is extremely out of character with the surrounding buildings. Need to maintain unique boutique heritage feel.
42
Page 94 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 309 5712117 Allison Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Licence Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 310 5712118 Sloewensohn Mosman No need for another supermarket which will take over Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction space currently used by small individual shops. Important submission #2. supermarket to keep Mosman’s village atmosphere. It would create huge traffic problems on already busy roads. There is no need for it – already an abundance of choice. 311 5712130 Jane Barnes Mosman Concerns re overdevelopment which will bring more Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction traffic into our community. Traffic density already an issue submission #2. supermarket on Military Rd, do not need large commercial buildings in vicinity to schools. Increased commercial outlets would challenge small businesses. Planning Goals and objectives are worthy, but there are no statements to protect against such intrusions. They do not contain concrete actions to protect the fabric of our community. 312 5712132 Carole Mosman Strongly opposed to developments such as the rumoured Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths development on Military Rd. It will create submission #2. supermarket traffic chaos in the area, destroy Mosman Village. The small local shops, which contribute to the local community and dynamic will not be able to co-exist in this environment. Mosman is already well-serviced by supermarkets within and nearby the suburb. There is strong community concern about this development. 313 5712145 Susanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Heap Junction Mosman has ample supermarkets within a 10 minute submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket drive. 314 5712149 Jason Guildea Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction It would put more pressure on local amenities and road submission #2. supermarket network, and be completely out of character. 315 5712170 D Snedden Mosman Concerned Mosman Junction is losing its village qualities Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction and the threat of the mooted Woolworths development. submission #2. supermarket Support the statement in Planning Priority 6. The development would be an overdevelopment of the site, the bulk and street face would be inconsistent with the village atmosphere. Extra supermarkets are not needed as there are already three supermarkets in Mosman and three in Neutral Bay. It will put more pressure on the existing small shopkeepers. Additional traffic would add significantly to already very busy Military and Belmont Roads and pose a danger to pedestrians and children. 316 5712182 Louise Mosman Concerned over Woolworths proposal as it would destroy Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Humphreys Junction the village character, result in closure of small shops and submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket impact traffic. Mosman is already well serviced by supermarkets.
43
Page 95 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 317 5712190 Robert & Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Juliana Junction Greatest appeal of this area is the cafes and small submission #2. Clemesha supermarket specialty shops. Mosman already has IGA and Aldi (Mosman) supermarkets and does not need a mega-supermarket. It would grossly change the entire fabric of Mosman Village. 318 5712234 Natalie Mosman Against the Woolworths development. Concerns Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Donovan, Junction regarding impact of development on village atmosphere. submission #2. Giles supermarket Huge corporations should not be allowed to buy large Donovan, amounts of real estate and turn them into low end Alexa shopping centres. Donovan & Max Donovan (Undisclosed) 319 5712282 Siobhan Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Campbell Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 320 5712283 Stephen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Craike Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 321 5712284 Carolyn Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hinton Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 322 5712285 Holt1824 Mosman No to Woolworths, save our village - It's what makes Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman special. submission #2. supermarket 323 5712286 Lisbeth Star Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 324 5712287 Walter Mosman The draft LSPS would fail to prevent over-development, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Carpenter Junction such as the mooted Woolworths outlet for the Military Rd. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Need to include statements that ensure Mosman Village is maintained, prevent further grid-lock on Military Rd and prevent mega retail outlets. Direction 1 requires infrastructure to support development, new infrastructure would not be capable of supporting large scale retail. Already poor traffic is a significant limitation on more large scale development and is an issue for emergency vehicles. Mosman has sufficient choice of supermarkets. 325 5712288 Paul Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hammans Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 326 5712289 Peter Abelson Other Support the outline of the Draft LSPS. Suggest a strong Planning Priority 3 is to provide a range of Yes – New Planning Priority (Mosman) positive strategy for services that enhance social facilities and services to meet community 4 for healthy built cohesion, strongly support policies to enhance and needs, and foster a culturally rich, creative and environments included socially connected Mosman community. New
44
Page 96 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? maintain visual amenity. Planning Priority 4 is focused on healthy built environments, which includes planning to connect and strengthen communities, Mosman Strongly support Planning Priority No 6 with its emphasis Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction on village character. The visual heritage and personal feel submission #2. supermarket needs to be protected. Traffic & Plans need to be developed for traffic management over Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport the medium term. submission #3. 327 5712291 Nellie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hepworth Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 328 5712292 Margaret Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Crane Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 329 5712293 James Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Stewart Junction There are two Woolworths at Neutral Bay submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 330 5712294 BelDeg Mosman Strongly oppose the Woolworths proposal along Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Road. Density has sky rocketed, although the village has submission #2. supermarket been largely protected. Place Woolworths somewhere else that won't congest the strip. 331 5712295 Eva Heaton Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 332 5712296 Lisa Bennett Mosman Strongly oppose the Woolworths development plan in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman. It will destroy our very special and unique submission #2. supermarket village atmosphere. 333 5712297 Angela Other Structure Plan is unclear. The area around Cobbittee St The Structure Plan is a simple plan intended to Yes – The Structure Plan Lenning and the business areas were coloured the same grey with indicate the key themes of Council’s 20 year has been revised to improve (Mosman) no explanation in the legend. The reference to sensitive land use planning vision for Mosman. The plan clarity. land is confusing as there is land not highlighted which has been revised in response to feedback. could be considered sensitive, e.g. unmade Pretoria Ave. 334 5712461 Lindie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Treleaven Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 335 5712463 Sandra Gai Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hepworth Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 336 5712480 Simon Scott Mosman Please do not ruin the Village, Woolworths must not be Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction approved. submission #2. supermarket 337 5712523 John and Mosman Development of a Woolworths Supermarket on Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kaye Brooks Junction Road Mosman Village. It will wipe out the individual food submission #2.
45
Page 97 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket shops of Mosman Village which add so much to the ‘village’ concept. Mosman “Village” will be changed drastically. 338 5712529 Joan Mosman Please do not destroy the loveliness of Military Road by Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Morrison- Junction allowing a large supermarket chain into the area. We submission #2. Swan supermarket have many supermarkets already in Neutral Bay and Spit (Undisclosed) Junction. 339 5712663 Gregory Mosman Opposed to Woolworths. Adequately served with three Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction "super markets" at Bridgepoint and need to preserve the submission #2. supermarket Village atmosphere. Woolworths would destroy the small operators. Traffic, which is already a problem, would be far worse with the introduction of a major shopping centre. 340 5712668 Tina Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bradstreet Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 341 5712671 Maddison Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bertinshaw Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 342 5712678 Wayne Martin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 343 5712722 Ursula Mosman Opposed to Woolworths developing a megastore in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ehrentraut Junction Mosman. It would not be small scale nor blend in with the submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket village atmosphere. Old heritage buildings would need to be demolished, potentially losing the Mosman Club. Extensive excavation will have negatives. Trucks servicing Woolworths will further congest Military Rd. Traffic, dust and noise from construction will affect neighbouring properties, pedestrian, nearby schools and local facilities. Mosman is already serviced by larger retailers that fit into the fabric of the village. Need to preserve Mosman’s heritage and village atmosphere. 344 5712770 Kay Maslen Mosman Strongly oppose any supermarket or similar large Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction enterprise in Mosman. Concerned it will drive Mosman’s submission #2. supermarket shops out of business. Mosman without its shops will not be Mosman. 345 5712798 Mandy Reid Mosman Strongly opposed the Woollies development. Ludicrous Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction that a huge development could be considered as the submission #2. supermarket added pollution, traffic, overcrowding, demands and pressures placed on residents and retailers is unwarranted and unnecessary. The unique feel of Mosman would be lost and this would act as a precursor for more. Development goes against environmental conservation and overpopulation principles, such as
46
Page 98 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? providing more greenspace. 346 5712808 Margaret Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gock Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 347 Michael G. Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McEvoy and Junction This area is well serviced by supermarkets and local submission #2. Suzanne M. supermarket shops in Mosman and nearby suburbs, including two McEvoy Woolworths at Neutral Bay. No provisions in the LSPS to (Mosman) prevent monster development the like of the Woolworths store. Traffic on our local roads is at capacity. 348 5712914 Stopwoolwort Mosman Save the village atmosphere from Woolworths. Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to hs Junction has a nice village feel due to the myriad of small shops submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket that line Military Road. Having a large Woolworths will bring more large supply trucks into the area and will reduce the quaintness that is currently Mosman. 349 5712918 Yolande Economy & The use of the B1, B2, B3 and B4 zones in the LEP Planning Priority 11 relates to local businesses. No Stone Tourism should be reviewed to change the zoning of Spit Junction Action 1 is to consider the range of business (Undisclosed) to B3 to provide a clear separation from Mosman activities that occur in Mosman to ensure that Junction; and provide for clear employment growth planning controls are responsive to innovation opportunities in B4 and B3 zones by making all and change. Land zoning within Mosman’s commercial development permissible. three local centres and the Military Road corridor is addressed in the Council report. Mosman Introduce a provision to limit the size of retail premises in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction B2 and B1 zones to 500 sq metres to respect the “village” submission #2. supermarket and “heritage” character of these areas. Traffic & Undertake a transport/traffic study to look for solutions to Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport the increasing traffic problems in Mosman - particularly submission #3. Military Road – including limiting large trucks near schools and through residential areas and increasing parking opportunities. Open Space & Provide ongoing protection of the Foreshore Scenic Planning Priority 13 addresses the need for No Sustainability Protection Areas (Permanent Housing Code Exclusion). ongoing protection of land within the Scenic Seek a review of the Bushfire policy to limit the size of the Protection Area, including permanent exclusion Bushfire Hazard Zone and to remove or limit 10/50 from the Housing Code and Medium Density provisions. Code of the Codes SEPP. Prioritise the protection of unmade roads (convert to zone Bushfire policy in NSW is managed by the E2, create policy to not allow privatisation) and continue NSW Government and beyond the scope of the to acknowledge the outstanding bush regeneration / bush draft LSPS. care programs. Planning Priority 12 is to protect, conserve and enhance Mosman’s urban tree canopy and bushland. Action 5 is to review the zoning of unmade road reserves under MLEP 2012 for those sites that have achieved an improvement in bushland quality. Action 6 is to review flora and fauna within Mosman’s bushland to provide
47
Page 99 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? a snapshot of biodiversity values. 350 5712924 Rob Magee Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 351 5712961 DM and SJ Mosman Strongly opposed to Woolworths developing in Mosman. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Smith Junction Concerns regarding losing village atmosphere. Mosman submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket already have a full service grocery store at Mosman IGA and Bridgepoint, and two huge Woolworths already at Neutral Bay Village 352 5712974 Alfredo Other Fully support the vision of future Mosman presented in Building regulation and certification are Yes – a paragraph re this Bustos- the strategy. Obstacles to impose the vision to some important parts of the NSW planning system. has been included within Ramitrez developers, particularly approvals by certifiers. Suggest The 2015 Independent Review of the Building Planning Priority 6, as well (Mosman) Council puts a submission to the State Government Professionals Act 2005, also known as the as an action to advocate to recommending certifiers must fully conform to Councils' Lambert Review, raised concerns about private the NSW Government for regulations and LEP. certifier and the integrity of the system. Some improvements in the NSW improvements have been made but more can building regulation and be done to ensure that certifiers will provide certification system. services without prejudice, and that decisions made are robust and independent. Mosman Suggest limiting the surface area of proposed retail sites Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction to only 350 m2 not to 500 m2 as presently proposed. submission #2. supermarket 353 5712995 Rafael Mosman Strongly object to a potential Woolworths development on Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jacques Junction Military Rd and against any large building construction in submission #2. Schneider supermarket the Mosman Village area. High-density of traffic already (Undisclosed) exists on nearby roads, this is going to get considerably worse and is a major safety issue. 354 5713028 Caroline Jane Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 355 5713032 Helen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gillespie Junction Yet to find one person who feels that Mosman needs a submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Woolworths and that allowing a supermarket of that size wouldn't be detrimental to the village atmosphere. 356 5713051 Lynda Gajic Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 357 5713052 Lyn Gajic Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 358 5713155 Marcus Housing Regarding MLEP FSR and Height controls. Disconnect The maximum permitted height and FSR No Hinzack between the controls on high density sites (R3 and B2). controls in MLEP 2012 are just that - maximum (Undisclosed) For example if following DCP setback guidelines and limits, which may or may not be achievable
48
Page 100 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? max. height it will significantly exceed FSR, making it depending on the nature and circumstances of impossible to realise development potential of a site. a site. Action 1 of Planning Priority 6 is to Please review FSR and height controls. consider planning controls within MLEP 2012 and DCPs to ensure high quality construction and design 359 5713156 Doug Henry Mosman No to Woollies. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 360 5713157 MC Mosman Mosman’s village atmosphere makes it unique. Potential Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths development on Military Rd is not needed submission #2. supermarket and does not comply with Planning Priority 6. Military Rd is already busy, additional traffic and deliveries would destroy the unique feel. Plenty of shopping options in Mosman from local businesses to other supermarkets. A bigger supermarket would destroy the atmosphere forever. 361 5713158 Bill Shew Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 362 5713200 John R. Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Davidson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 363 5713201 Robert Riches Mosman Strongly object to any large scale construction, such as Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Annette Junction the mooted Woolworths development, in Mosman submission #2. Riches supermarket Village/Junction. Large-scale development will destroy (Mosman) the unique village feel and character that Mosman, and bring increased traffic and congestion. No need for a large supermarket as there are plenty at Spit Junction and surrounding suburbs. Small retail shops better serve our community. Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail. 364 5713220 Nick Dowling Mosman Opposed to any Mosman LSPS that accommodates large Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction format retail and oppose the mooted Woolworths submission #2. supermarket supermarket on Military Rd. It would undermine economic viability of the strip and destroy character, it would add traffic congestion to already significantly congested roads, endanger pedestrians especially pedestrians from nearby sensitive uses (schools, parks, etc.), diminish the village’s architectural heritage, impact on residents and threaten position of the Mosman Club. 365 5713256 Diana Mosman Strongly object to Woolworths plans to build a new store Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Nicholas Junction in Mosman Village. Already smaller businesses have submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket closed. This area is very well accommodated with local stores and larger stores at Bridgepoint. Local stores give the area a village feel. Construction disruptions and ongoing traffic would be a nightmare. Leave the village as
49
Page 101 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? it is. 366 5713329 Deborah Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Rattray Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 367 5713330 Wendy Mosman Object to Woolworths Proposal in Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hallam Junction Support introducing planning controls to limit the size of submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket retail premises to only allow small, local shops in this section of Mosman. 368 5713418 Katharine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Collins Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 369 5713422 Suzanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Saxton Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 370 5713501 Ursula and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Liam Forde Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 371 5713503 Simon Dean Mosman Vehemently oppose any Woolworths' store in Mosman. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman, Spit Junction, Neutral Bay and Cremorne are submission #2. supermarket over catered with supermarkets. Need to limit the tide of bland branding, Mosman is in danger of becoming a sterile strip. The village is already declining, opening a Woolworths store would not foster a feeling of community. It would reduce interaction, increase congestion and stress local shops. 372 5713563 Chris and Sue Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dale Junction It would not provide jobs and would decay the shopping submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket strip. Little Justification as there are ample supermarkets nearby. Would unfairly impact resident amenity and community well-being. 373 5713579 Russell Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths proposal as traffic is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Scrimshaw Junction already poor and will worsen, Mosman is already well submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket serviced by supermarkets. Schoolchildren safety will be severely impacted and suburban streets will be flooded with traffic. It would result in the closure of several local shops (there are already several empty shops), Council would not benefit from rate payments from this development. Other businesses in Mosman may be impacted. Local community facilities and venues will be more difficult to access. This is not a development of high significance and should be dealt with by Council, not the State Government. 374 5713644 Dr Sue Austin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman already has enough supermarkets at Spit submission #2.
50
Page 102 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket Junction as well as a small IGA supermarket in Mosman Village. A supermarket would undermine these businesses and lower choice. 375 5713667 Susan Mosman Opposed to any large commercial developments such as Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Grawson Junction a large-scale supermarket or shopping centre in Mosman submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket Village or Mosman suburb. Suburb is popular due to its small-scale shops, which creates an enjoyable character. A supermarket will threaten this. Large-scale supermarkets are available nearby and easily accessible if required. No more are needed or desirable. 376 5713725 Kim Riordan Mosman Object to a potential Woolworths in Mosman. There is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction absolutely no community need for it, with two IGAs and submission #2. supermarket Aldi in Mosman, and two Woolworths in next suburb. Already congested road will be almost impassable. Even a smaller ‘express’ outlet would kill off smaller independent retailers. It will destroy local character and amenity of Military Rd. 377 5713727 Virginia Mosman Strongly support Planning Priority 6. Mosman Junction is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Howard Junction a heritage conservation area, 2-storey in height, with submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket traditional shopfronts is what contributes to the village atmosphere. A Woolworths supermarket does not conform to any of these goals and should never be agreed to. 378 5713728 Maria Pettaras Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 379 5713745 Andrew and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Cathy Junction submission #2. Cameron supermarket (Mosman) 380 5713746 Kathy Ting Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 381 5713747 John Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Goodman Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 382 5713763 Mark Heath Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction The area is already struggling to cope with traffic. The submission #2. supermarket development would do nothing but destroy the current amenity of Mosman Junction. 383 5713765 Margaret Mosman Very much against the development of the planned Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Suthers Junction Woolworths supermarket. It will change the character of submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Mosman Junction and it would be disappointing if the Council allows this to go ahead.
51
Page 103 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 384 5714020 Angela Jones Mosman It is not required as there are supermarkets at Spit Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Junction, at Cremorne, and many smaller shops in submission #2. supermarket Mosman. Traffic is already desperately congested, it would only be worsened and would be really dangerous. Mosman Club and many local shops would disappear and the village would lose character. 385 5714025 Pauline Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Huang Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 386 5714027 Sarah123 Mosman I strongly oppose the plans for Woolworths in Mosman. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction will take away from local small business, it will ruin the submission #2. supermarket village feel of Mosman, it will increase traffic (which is already congested along that stretch of Military Rd). There are plenty of nearby supermarkets for locals to shop (including IGA on Military Rd & Bridgepoint) and Woolworths at Neutral Bay. 387 5714029 Michael Horin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 388 5714031 Marisa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ronsisvalle Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 389 5714032 Alison Boffa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 390 5714033 Grace Boffa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 391 5714034 Joseph Boffa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 392 5714035 Johanna Mosman Don’t need more supermarkets in Mosman. We have Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dreyer Junction enough. Keep the village feel. Council is already selling submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket off retail buildings and boring architecture is going in. Other Roads and footpaths are shocking. Constantly being dug This feedback has been forwarded to Council’s No. up, and no care when being levelled off by contractors. Engineering Manager for consideration. Trip hazards everywhere. 393 5714039 Peter Duffy Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 394 5714040 Peter and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Mary Straton Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 395 5714043 Megan Lui Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
52
Page 104 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 396 5714045 Benjamin Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Roberts Junction Would not provide a diverse quality of goods. Mosman submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket would lose smaller independent businesses which provide a more diverse range of goods. 397 5714104 John and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kathleen Junction submission #2. Shine supermarket (Mosman) 398 5714116 Jocelyn Aldis Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 399 5714118 Bibipapa Mosman Fully oppose the proposal to open Woolworths shop in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction the proposed site. Increased traffic and building activity submission #2. supermarket will greatly impact the village life. Big enterprise will have an adverse impact on the small businesses that we as local residents fully support. The shops at Bridgepoint fully satisfy the needs of the residents. 400 5714120 Laura Mosman Totally opposed to a gigantic development, such as the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Cunningham Junction planned Woolworths, in Mosman. We do not need more submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket supermarkets- there are already sufficient supermarkets in Mosman and Neutral Bay. Smaller operators will close up and there will be no competition at all. Council needs to maintain Mosman as a low key, close knit village environment. 401 5714131 Veronika Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Meiklejohn Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 402 5714133 Mymosman Mosman Support the continued planning focus of Mosman as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction village. Allowing a supermarket in Mosman would destroy submission #2. supermarket the village atmosphere, amenity and lifestyle and exacerbate the existing traffic congestion – would be an issue for emergency vehicles. Council's planning controls should be allowed to limit the size of retail premises and only allow small local shops. 403 5714134 Jack Mosman No desire for a Woolworths Development in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Goodman Junction Village, however, existing supermarkets in Mosman are submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket substandard and should be upgraded. 404 5714135 Alicia Trotter Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 405 5714138 Brett Mosman Absolutely oppose the Mosman Woolworths development Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to O'Donnell Junction plan. Not in best interest of community. Adequate submission #2.
53
Page 105 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Undisclosed) supermarket supermarkets within Mosman and surrounding suburbs. It would increase the traffic through an already busy main road and the village atmosphere would be greatly affected by loss of small businesses. 406 5714236 Jon Crothers Mosman Opposed to proposed desire for Woolworths in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Junction. It is too large, doesn’t fit the locale, cause traffic submission #2. supermarket problems, impact local food outlets and there are already outlets at Neutral Bay. Support introducing planning controls to limit size of shops and keep traditional character intact. 407 5714347 Wal Sewell Mosman Strongly opposed to Woolworths. It would increase traffic Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction on Mosman's busiest road. Bridgepoint and IGA services submission #2. supermarket the needs of the community already. 408 5714348 Rosemary Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Targett Junction Traffic on Belmont Rd is already congested and would be submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket exacerbated. It would be a risk to the thousands of school children in the surrounding area. 409 5714350 Anthony Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Targett Junction Traffic on Belmont Rd is already congested and would be submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket exacerbated. It would be a risk to the hundreds of school children in the surrounding area. 410 5714352 Nicholas Chen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction It is of fundamental importance that the key features of submission #2. supermarket Mosman be maintained for future generations 411 5714353 Annette Chen Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 412 5714354 Alan Porritt Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 413 5714356 Sharon Clarke Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 414 5714357 Penelope Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Macgeorge Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 415 5714358 Dr Mary Biggs Mosman Opposed to large scale retail in Mosman, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths. It would destroy local character and affect submission #2. supermarket existing small businesses that add to the village feel. There are two Woolworths within a 10 minute drive of Mosman. Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail in Mosman/Village. 416 5714360 Sarah Sellars Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
54
Page 106 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Cremorne) Junction submission #2. supermarket 417 5714361 Saskia Jane Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 418 5714362 Clare Reoch Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction A supermarket does not compliment Mosman character submission #2. supermarket that comprises small retail shops and cafes and has a charming village feel. A supermarket is totally unwarranted, given the supply within the area already. Traffic flow is already compromised in our area, without such overdevelopment. 419 5714364 Natalie Wilson Mosman Opposed to the Woolworths development. A Woolworths, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction or any like retail conglomerate, will further destroy the submission #2. supermarket environment and the livelihood of local small businesses. 420 5714366 David Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McElveney Junction submission #2. and Family supermarket (Mosman) 421 5714367 Dmac Mosman Strongly object to proposed Woolworths development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Village, it is completely against the nature of the submission #2. supermarket environment. 422 5714369 Jeff Gordon Other Agree with the 14 Planning Priorities. In particular Noted No and Jess priorities 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13. Morris Mosman Alarmed by and strongly oppose a possible Woolworths Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction on Military Rd, it is inconsistent with above priorities. It submission #2. supermarket would put pressure on infrastructure, bring more traffic to already congested roads, worsen traffic parking and transport, attract pests and vermin, bring construction disruptions, destroy local character, resident amenity and heritage character. Woolworths would have a significant environmental impact with waste production, and electricity and water usage. 423 5714370 Robyn Mosman Large-scale development of any type in the Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Singleton Junction Village area must be stopped. Any Woolworths submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket development would be inappropriate and inconsistent with planning priorities due to traffic and congestion issues, pedestrian safety issues, destruction of village atmosphere, streetscape, reduced access, and as Mosman is adequately serviced by supermarkets already. 424 5714371 Randolf Traffic & Supportive of a 20-year vision/plan being approved by Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Clinton Transport stakeholders. Some major topics should take Re parking, Action 4 of Planning Priority 9 is to submission #3. (Undisclosed) precedence, including supportive of Beaches Link tunnel maximse public car parking availability through and suggest clearways along Spit/Military Road if not improved management of existing car parking built. New development should be encouraged and/or
55
Page 107 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? incentivised to expand underground parking. areas. Mosman Supportive of Woolworth development. Could provide an Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction underpass under Military Rd to link fragmented shops, submission #2. supermarket relieve parking and congestion issues, and create a centralised community hub. 425 5714373 Taylor Musa Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 426 5714375 Elizabeth Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hanley Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 427 5714377 Rosemary Mosman Opposed to Woolworths as there are already four local Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Randall Junction supermarkets and more nearby, is no room for additional submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket traffic in Mosman and the beauty of Mosman would be destroyed. 428 5714379 Sal Hawtho Mosman Totally opposed to Woolworths as it would destroy the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction historic village atmosphere, add to already problematic submission #2. supermarket traffic, destroy local businesses and cause major disruptions during construction. There are already supermarkets in close proximity. 429 5714380 Julie Tariel Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 430 5714381 Catherine Mosman Totally opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. There are Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction enough supermarkets and it would destroy the unique submission #2. supermarket village. As seen in Beecroft when a Woolworths opened it would result in closure of small businesses, increase traffic and reduce parking. 431 5714382 Lachlan Mosman Object to Woolworths for a number of reasons highlighted Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Moffet Gray Junction in emails from other residents. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 432 5714383 William A Mosman Object to plans for a Woolworths and to displace the RSL. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bovingdon Junction Need to consider community before corporations. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 433 5714384 Murray Traffic & General concerns regarding traffic in Mosman. Gridlock is Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Westwood Transport an increasing problem and more needs to be done to submission #3. (Mosman) address it. Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. Concerns regarding Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction traffic and congestion, destruction of local businesses. submission #2. supermarket Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises. 434 5714385 Bob St Julian Mosman No particular bias towards Woolworths. Community lobby Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction groups are distorting the truth. There would be pros and submission #2. supermarket cons of such a development. No one has seen plans from
56
Page 108 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Woolworths. Need to remain open minded and hear Woolworths out. 435 5714388 Irene O'Leary Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 436 5714389 Eleanor Louw Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 437 5714391 Rey Louw Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 438 5714393 Dianne Wyllie Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman. The beauty of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Village is the underdeveloped shopping village submission #2. supermarket harmonious with Mosman’s natural environment. Local shops and the RSL would close. Already Woolworths in Neutral Bay and other supermarkets at Bridgepoint. 439 5714394 Nicole Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thompson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 440 5714396 Matt Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thompson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 441 5714397 Chris Mundy Mosman Strongly opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Traffic is chaotic enough, there are sufficient submission #2. supermarket supermarkets in Mosman, traffic is chaotic enough, and construction would cause major disruptions. 442 5714398 Colin Tan Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Also opposed to any development that could result in submission #2. supermarket increased traffic on Military Rd due to potential danger for pedestrians and school children. 443 5714397 Winnie Ching Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Also opposed to any development that could result in submission #2. supermarket increased traffic on Military Rd due to potential danger for pedestrians and school children. 444 5714401 Gabrielle Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pimstone Junction submission #2. (Cremorne) supermarket 445 5714402 Helen Franc Mosman Totally opposed to Woolworths development. Already the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction area is congested with heavy traffic. There are adequate submission #2. supermarket shops which will no doubt be affected. Need to save our village atmosphere and friendliness as well as look after our residents. 447 5714405 Anna Mosman Strongly oppose Woolworths in Mosman Village. The high Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
57
Page 109 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Newman Junction street is well serviced and there are supermarkets at submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket Bridge Point and Neutral Bay. 448 5714406 Carly Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McMullan Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 449 5714407 Winsome Mosman Completely opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Duffy Junction No need for another supermarket, already have enough submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket food and good outlets. The appearance of a large Woolworths supermarket would be at odds with the village’s current architecture. Traffic and parking generated from the development would be unbearable. It will drive many of our local shopkeepers to the wall. 450 5714409 Patriciadibbs Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths development as traffic is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction already hectic and it would cause more issues, and there submission #2. supermarket is already an adequate selection of shops. 451 5714410 Mark W Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dawson Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 452 5714413 Barbara & Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jose Junction No need as there are a considerable number of submission #2. Fernandez supermarket supermarkets located in more appropriate places within (Mosman) the local area. Increased traffic congestion would endanger children from nearby schools and childcare. 453 5714414 Kimberly Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Grounds Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 454 5714415 Teresa White Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman. There is no benefit Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction given the availability of other supermarkets in a short submission #2. supermarket distance. It would have visual and other detrimental effects on the village atmosphere. It would be inconsistent with Mosman Club’s objectives (constitution and strategic objectives). Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. 455 5714417 Ben Gillies Mosman A Woolworths supermarket in Mosman Village will have Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction an extremely negative effect on small businesses in the submission #2. supermarket area. It would further add to Military Rd congestion. No need for a Woolworths as there are two 5-8 minutes drive from Military road. 456 5714418 Maz Mosman Don't need Woolworths in Mosman. It will ruin the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction beautiful village with unnecessary traffic, congestion and submission #2. supermarket pollution. 457 5714419 Kayzibuck Mosman Object to a Woolworths in Mosman Village due to traffic, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction congestion, parking, pedestrian (in particular submission #2.
58
Page 110 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket schoolchildren) safety concerns. 458 5714420 Peter Cook Mosman Strongly opposed to Woolworths building in Mosman. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction would be out of character with the shopping strip. With submission #2. supermarket many Woolworths in nearby suburbs, there is no need for another. Do not want the Mosman Club to close. Need to retain use of small business shopfronts. Traffic congestion would increase hazard, pollution and quality of life in the immediate area. 459 5714421 Christine Mosman Mosman does not need a Woolworths which, in time, will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Fegan Junction force the wonderful small village grocery shops and submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket greengrocers out of business. It would be the end of the village lifestyle. 460 5714422 Vanessa Mosman Opposed to any Mosman LSPS that accommodates Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Moore Junction future large format retail in the Mosman Village – submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket specifically the mooted Woolworths supermarket. Concerned over loss of unique village character, increased traffic and congestion, pedestrian safety, impact on architectural heritage, quality of life impact and potential loss of the Mosman Club. 461 5714423 Suzanne Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Mitchell Junction It would wipe out small businesses, be the end of unique submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket shopping in Mosman, and increase traffic and congestion on Military Rd. 462 5714426 Clare Taylor Mosman Preserve the heritage and village feel of the Military Rd Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Tony Junction shopping zone. Do not allow large corporations (such as submission #2. Dooley supermarket Woolworths) to build here, due to the negative impact on (Mosman) traffic and congestion, and small businesses. Open Space & Focus on more environmental and management of Planning Priority 12 addresses protection of Yes – additional text added Sustainability environment, such as eliminating use of pesticides and Mosman’s landform, waterways and bushland. to both Planning Priorities herbicides, focus on big picture (e.g. imbalance of wildlife, It outlines some of the Council service 12 and 15 to detail Council proliferation of brush turkeys) and make Mosman single- contracts, plans and initiatives in this space, initiatives use plastic free. including management of open spaces, water quality and enhancing habitat corridor links. Planning Priority 15 relates to waste efficiency, and gives examples of Council initiatives including education campaigns to reduce waste. 463 5714428 J. Forbes Mosman Against Woolworths in Mosman, traffic is bad enough and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction there are enough supermarkets. Residents do not want submission #2. supermarket this. 464 5714430 RC & CL Housing Population has increased and demographics changed, Refer to response to submission #90. Refer to response to Stevens homes are becoming bigger, backyard privacy eroded. submission #90. Mosman The character and of Mosman Junction has been Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction constant despite some new developments. Suggest the submission #2.
59
Page 111 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket Strategic Plan should: • Limit the size, (Height and floor space) of the properties along Military Rd. • Protect the precious nature of the Military Rd retail strip. The development opposite the fire station is a good example of keeping with character, Dan Murphys is a bad example. 465 5714431 Bonnie Carlo Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman’s demographics are stable and unlikely to submission #2. supermarket change significantly. Currently have more than enough supermarkets and retailers to serve the population. Woolworths suggest it would open more restaurants and bars – Mosman does not need more. Mosman would lose its uniqueness. 466 5714432 Pauline Nolan Mosman Strongly object to Woolworths or any other large Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction supermarket impinging on our village atmosphere. submission #2. supermarket Community contact is imperative for good mental health. Need to preserve the shopping precinct and small businesses, and restore Military Rd frontages. Traffic congestion and overshadowing also a concern. Bridgepoint adequately services Mosman. 467 5714433 William Forde Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 468 5714436 Beatrice Mosman Strongly object to the Woolworths development due to Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Blanks Junction impact on the village atmosphere, increased traffic and submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket congestion, no demand as Mosman is adequately serviced and impact on small retailers. 469 5714437 Kimberley Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Brennan Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 470 5714451 Sarah Norgate Mosman Opposed to a large scale supermarket, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Woolworths, in Mosman Village. Concerned over impact submission #2. supermarket on small retail shops and the inevitable traffic congestion and noise. It would impact the unique character of Mosman. I support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction. 471 5714468 Conor O’Prey Mosman Strongly opposed to the rumoured plan by Woolworths. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to & Rebecca Junction is inconsistent with at least 2 LSPS planning priorities (6 submission #2. O’Dwyer supermarket & 8). It would be antithetical to the idea of a village (Mosman) atmosphere, local shops would close leaving visually intrusive boarded-up shopfronts. Traffic and parking would not be ameliorated, delivery trucks would cause disruptions. Construction would cause disruptions with significant excavation and heavy vehicle traffic.
60
Page 112 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Supermarkets adequately service Mosman. 472 5714472 BEJ Mosman A Woolworths in Mosman Village is unnecessary. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman is well serviced by two IGAs, and other shops. submission #2. supermarket Traffic would be hugely increased. Noise and general disruptions are unwelcomed. Mosman Village is unique, the development would destroy the community. 473 5714473 Carol Wright Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 474 5714474 Roger Clarke Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 475 5714516 Alexandra Economy & Need to inject more life into the area - shops close early Planning Priority 11 relates to local businesses Yes - Additional actions Deakin Tourism and the streets are lifeless in the evening. Promote a little and the economy. Action 2 is to deliver have been included in (Mosman) more, affordable “alfresco” evening and nightlife. initiatives that promote night life in Mosman and Planning Priority 11 re the that support the local night-time economy. night time economy Mosman We do not need more supermarkets in the village that will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction add more traffic in an already busy “dead-end”. There is submission #2. supermarket sufficient choice in supermarkets. 142-152 Spit Rd may be more suitable. 476 5714565 Jeremy Morris Mosman Opposed to supermarket style developments in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Village/Junction. Shops would close impacting the unique submission #2. supermarket village character, it would be detrimental to the village atmosphere, it would attract more traffic and congestion, there are alternative shops available and it would impact the viability of existing businesses. 477 5714567 Shoshana Mosman Strongly opposed to any large-scale supermarket, such Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Faire Junction as Woolworths in Mosman Junction/Village. A submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket supermarket would destroy local businesses and the sense of community. Supermarkets in Neutral Bay are sufficient. It would have a large impersonal format and would attract more cars, trucks and pollution. More outdoor village spaces need to be developed and low-rise shopfront village atmosphere retained. 478 5714580 Lexie Mosman Keep Mosman Village as is - No Woolworths. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 479 5714581 Cheryll Olmos Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 480 5714586 Isabelle Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman as it would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Rigotti Junction deteriorate the historic village atmosphere, traffic submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket congestion, parking issues, intrusive building dominating streetscape, antisocial behaviour. Mosman is adequately serviced by supermarkets within and surrounding the
61
Page 113 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? suburb. The Mosman community has worked long and hard to form the vibrant well-loved village. 481 5714593 Elizabeth Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Corbett Junction Many small local shops would disappear. Delivery trucks submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket and construction vehicles would cause disruption and safety issues for students. It would be disadvantageous to rate and tax payers. 482 5714626 Carolyn Mosman Concerned about the prospect of Woolworths in Mosman. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Madden Junction Does not fit in with the village feel of Mosman and there is submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket no need for another supermarket. Housing Very concerned about any development of Spit Junction. Refer to response to submission #601. Refer to response to Five levels is too high and would be out of place. The The current maximum allowable height limit submission #601. current Council Chambers adds charm and should not be under MLEP 2012 is five storeys, although replaced with residential buildings. Would not like to see many sites are not developed to this capacity. village green lost to car parking covered in fake grass. Demolition of the Civic Centre building and surrounds was considered several years ago, however there are no plans to do this at this time. 483 5714644 Alan Bassal Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction There are already large-scale supermarkets at Spit submission #2. supermarket Junction, Neutral Bay and Cremorne. 484 5714660 Debbie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Edwards Junction No need as there are a number of supermarkets nearby. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket It would create congestion, be a hazard for school children and put local retailers out of business. 485 5715190 S Smith Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 486 5715194 Catherine Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McClellan Junction The area has always prided itself on village nature of the submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket community. 487 5715196 Louis Richard Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths in Mosman Village. It would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction have a terrible impact on smaller shops, local residents, submission #2. supermarket traffic and parking. Car parking is already difficult. 488 5715202 David Peters Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 489 5715204 Phoebe Mosman Opposed to any Woolworths proposal in Mosman. Traffic Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Schwandl Junction is bad enough on Military Rd. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 490 5715208 Kathy Penn Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Derek Junction Growth must be managed to maintain environmental submission #2. Burke
62
Page 114 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket amenity, liveability, landscapes and historic character. 491 5715214 Ben Tolley Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 492 5715220 David Peters Mosman Woolworth proposal is offensive and seeks to subvert the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction local economy. The community does not want it, Council submission #2. supermarket should do the right thing and block Woolworths. 493 5715223 Ita Mosman Opposed to Woolworths on Military Rd. Traffic is already Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Easterbrook Junction congested and would be worsened. Mosman already has submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket adequate supermarkets. 494 5715257 Keong & Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Swee Aw Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 495 5715263 Belinda Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Marshall Junction No need for a large scale supermarket as there are a submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket number of super markets and local shops nearby. 496 5715275 Graham and Mosman Strongly opposed to Woolworths (or any other Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pamela Lumb Junction supermarket chain) in Mosman Junction/village. It would submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket destroy the local character of the area. Delivery trucks would be a pedestrian and motorist hazard. Mosman is well served by existing small shops. Support changing planning controls to limit the size of retail in Mosman Junction/Village, and retaining a traditional low-rise shopfront environment. 497 5715276 Joanna Drew Mosman Opposed to Woolworths or any such large retailer on Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman High Street. It will destroy the very unique and submission #2. supermarket desirable character of Mosman, and be a huge danger to school children with increased traffic and trucks. 498 5715277 Sarah Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kennington Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 499 5715280 Libby Moffet Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Cremorne) Junction Mosman residents are already adequately serviced by submission #2. supermarket existing supermarkets and shops in Mosman and surrounds. Increased traffic would create chaos and pedestrian hazards, near two schools. 500 5715281 Susan Mosman Opposed to a Woolworths or other large-scale retail outlet Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lockhart Junction in the village. It would destroy local character and submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket ambience, there is no need as there is ample shopping nearby. Support changing planning controls to only allow small shops in Mosman. 501 5715283 Mary Cook Mosman Extremely opposed to proposed Woolworths development Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction in Mosman. Woolworths in Neutral Bay is adequate. The submission #2. village atmosphere creates a sense of community and
63
Page 115 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket enhanced wellbeing, this would be severely affected and may result in the closure of a number of shops. Traffic would be greatly increased and cause major issues. 502 5715286 Jill L’Estrange Mosman Generally supportive of the initiative of the Draft LSPS. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Must preserve Mosman’s heritage listed federation high submission #2. supermarket street and village atmosphere. Strongly support the development of local character provisions to maintain the local village character - including limits of 500sq metres on retail premises in neighbourhood centres. Support the introduction of stronger planning, heritage and design controls for Mosman Junction, Avenue Road shopping precinct and Spofforth Street shops. Heritage Recommend that an Aboriginal Heritage Cultural Centre Planning Priorities 3 and 8 respond to No. be established in Mosman. Aboriginal heritage. Most Aboriginal heritage sites in Mosman are located on public land within Sydney Harbour National Park. Mosman Art Gallery has hosted art collections celebrating Aboriginal heritage and culture. Open Space & It is essential to protect, maintain & enhance the natural Planning Priorities 12 and 13 address Yes – Some revisions are Sustainability beauty and landform of Mosman, including foreshore land protection of Mosman’s landform, bushland, made to Planning Priority 14 and bushland. waterways and foreshore lands. to refer to accessibility of To create sporting facilities that attract participants from Planning Priority 14 relates to land and water- open space, Council’s all over will add to the traffic congestion already based recreation. The challenges of managing implementation plans, and experienced in Mosman, affecting liveability. open space demands and access are noted in collaboration Middle Head Oval and Georges Heights Ovals are the rationale, and Action 2 refers to Council’s Commonwealth Heritage listed places with exceptional implementation plans. Action 4 is to collaborate environmental significance. Suggest priority of ‘protecting, with SHFT and NPWS to ensure coordinated conserving the natural, visual and environmental heritage outcomes for recreational spaces at Middle and of Mosman’s foreshores’ to apply to land. Georges Head. 503 5715289 Jane Mosman Strongly opposed to establishment of Woolworths in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Shankland Junction Mosman. It is unnecessary given the access to suitable submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket existing shops and increased traffic will have a substantial negative impact. 504 5715290 Marion Mosman Concerned that allowing big retailers like Woolworths will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Williams Junction adversely impact Mosman's liveability and unique appeal. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Increased traffic and delivery trucks would increase congestion. Would impact existing businesses and shops as they cannot compete and there would be less on street parking. Mosman is already well served with supermarkets and other retailers. It would detract from the village-like character. 505 5715293 Kirsten Mosman Opposed to the proposed Woolworths development. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Browne Junction goes against Planning Priorities 1, 6, 7, 8 as it is not submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket supported by infrastructure, does not enhance the neighbourhood environment, does not conserve built
64
Page 116 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? environment and would create access issues. Military Rd is already congested – it would only become more congested, dangerous and polluted making it less pleasant especially for pedestrians. 506 5715295 AM Kimber Mosman Strong opposition to the construction of a Woolworths in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Mosman Village. It does not align with the objectives that submission #2. supermarket have been outlined in the LSPS. It would be a major detraction from the village atmosphere, put pressure on existing businesses, would add to traffic/congestion, worsen parking and threaten the local character and amenity of the village. There is no need for a store closer than the two in Neutral Bay. 507 5715313 Lynette & Mosman Deplore any current move to permit Woolworths or similar Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jack Skipper Junction retailer, on Military Road. Would be counter- productive submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket to the public use and ambience of the area. It would disrupt traffic even further and destroy the existing village atmosphere. Request Council refuse any Woolworths development and introduce planning controls to limit the size and location of retail premises. 509 5715353 Rachel Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jackson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 510 5715368 Pamel Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Strudwick Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 511 5715369 David Lugton Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 512 5715395 Ian Hembry Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction In line with PP6 the peninsular is unsuitable for such submission #2. supermarket development. It would attract high volume traffic and large delivery trucks, impacting local schools and pedestrian safety. Village character and amenity would also be impacted. 513 5715430 Nicola Targett Mosman Strongly oppose the Woolworths development. Mosman’s Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction streets are already congested, the development would submission #2. supermarket create significant further pressure on those roads and around countless children. It will destroy the village culture of Mosman. There are already supermarkets within Mosman and nearby, the community does not need another. Numerous local shops will go out of business and homes will devalue. 514 5715438 John and Mosman Alarmed at the prospect of Woolworths destroying the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Trish Rogers Junction Mosman Village Atmosphere. Concerns over potential submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket horrendous traffic impacts, loss of small businesses and
65
Page 117 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? vacant shops. Open Space & Suggest fortnightly vegetation bin pick up, as current Green waste in Mosman is collected monthly, No Sustainability arrangements are not adequate. however an additional collection is available by booking a prepaid service through Council’s Waste Line or by visiting Council’s Civic Centre. Waste management is addressed in Planning Priority 15. Other Delighted with increasing fairy lights in Mosman and urge Noted No council to increase their numbers. 515 5715439 Steven Hedge Open Space & Open spaces are important – need to embrace Planning Priority 14 addresses land and water- No (Mosman) Sustainability technologies to expand sporting areas (artificial turf, based recreation. The challenge of managing lighting, multi-use etc.). Of most importance is updating open space with competing demands and Plans of Management (PoMs) to reflect changing time limited land supply is noted, as is the and stakeholder desires. They are highly prescriptive and importance of efficient management. Action 1 must be updated to deliver LSPS PP’s e.g. PoMs don’t is to prepare new and revised Plans of allow evening recreation. Balmoral PoM is approaching Management. 20 years old. Housing Council should not allow the trend of consolidating multi- Whilst not common, this does occur in No dwelling housing or lots into a single extra-large single Mosman, and is a challenge in land use dwelling. Ensure planning controls don’t dictate monotony planning particularly as Sydney’s population is and ensure that architecture of various styles is permitted growing and all councils must provide for when undertaken tastefully. additional housing. This matter may be considered as part of the local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. Economy & Generally supportive of objectives. Jobs can only be Planning Priority 11 relates to business uses Yes – new actions 2 and 3 Tourism delivered in an environment of light regulation and and the economy. Action 1 will consider the within Planning Priority 11 commercial encouragement. The Esplanade is under- range of business activities that occur within utilised. With adequate lighting, more activities/events the the municipality. Actions 2 and 3 relate to area could be more utilised and more accessible. delivering initiatives that promote night life in Over regulation stifles PP 3, 6, 9, 10 and 12. E.g. Mosman, that support the night time economy, Boatshed spent 4 years and $200,000 to deliver and support events that contribute to the local $780,000 that improved waterway access and enhanced economy and celebrate Mosman’s unique a socially connected venue. Red tape gets in the way of identity and heritage. Additionally, Action 1 of these priorities. Planning Priority 14 is to prepare new and revised Plans of Management, including for Balmoral. 516 5715440 Max Gosling Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Alternative shopping resources a short drive away, more submission #2. supermarket not needed in Mosman. Local infrastructure cannot support it. 517 5715441 Trish Rogers Mosman Absolutely opposed to Woolworths in Military Rd. Traffic Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction is already terrible in that area. Do not approve the submission #2. supermarket development. 518 5715442 Cdev Scobie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2.
66
Page 118 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket 519 5715443 Susanna Mosman Opposed to any large-scale supermarket development, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Short Junction e.g. Woolworths, in Mosman Village. It would destroy the submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket low-scale small shopfront character. Traffic congestion is already too horrific to consider the proposal. Request Council pass a by-law prohibiting large-scale development in Mosman Village. 520 5715444 Nancy Lovitt Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Already have supermarkets adequate to our needs. It submission #2. supermarket would destroy small businesses 521 5715445 Dianne and Mosman Gravely concerned over proposed large-scale retail Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Geoffrey Junction development planned by Woolworths. The size is huge submission #2. Pollock supermarket and out of scale and contrary to existing local character. It (Mosman) will undermine small businesses, affect the unique streetscape, create traffic congestion and chaos. 522 5715446 William A Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. Significant traffic Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bennett and Junction and congestion, and shortage of parking already an issue submission #2. Catherine supermarket and would be worsened. There is already adequate Bennett access to existing supermarkets. It would have an (Mosman) adverse impact on village atmosphere. 523 5715447 Sue and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Rodney Junction Already well serviced by retail shops in Mosman and submission #2. Birdsall supermarket nearby. Community prefers small individual shops. (Mosman) 524 5715448 Pamela Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Larson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 525 5715513 Karen Toker Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 526 5715537 Flemming Mosman Opposed to a large-scale supermarket, such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Christensen Junction Woolworths, in Mosman/Junction. It would be inconsistent submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket with the community village spirit and history of the area. It would increase traffic worsening congestion and endangering nearby sensitive uses (schools, parks, etc.). The benefits would not outweigh the costs and there would be a reduction in retail diversity. If it is to be considered request extensive consultation, comprehensive traffic report including management of deliveries. Would consider a small-scale Woolworths store. 527 5715627 Hasan Erman Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to and Kirsty Junction submission #2. Siddle supermarket
67
Page 119 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) 528 5715695 Michael Baker Mosman Object to Woolworths in peaceful Mosman. No need as Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction there are already 3 supermarkets in Mosman. It would be submission #2. supermarket the demise of local businesses. It would increase road traffic near vulnerable schools. Would result in loss of Mosman Club. 529 5715698 Judy Lane Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction submission #2. supermarket 530 5715702 D Withers Traffic & Roads are at capacity and cannot support more units and Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Transport dwellings. Re parking, Action 4 of Planning Priority 9 is to submission #3. Parking sensors are unnecessary and impact small maximse public car parking availability through businesses. improved management of existing car parking areas. Open Space & Sirius Cove water outlets need to be cleaned. Planning Priority 12 relates to protecting and Yes – Inclusion of Action 4 Sustainability Visitors to Clifton Gardens are leaving rubbish and hot enhancing waterways, and notes Council to Planning Priority 12, and coals on grass initiatives including SQID maintenance within rationale, relating to (Stormwater Quality Improvement Device), and Council service contracts Beaches and Reserves Cleaning. Action 4 is to maintain Council service contracts. Council Rangers monitor reserves and respond to complaints as they arise. Mosman Opposed to Woolworths due to concerns regarding traffic Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction and loss of village character/atmosphere. submission #2. supermarket Other Important to ensure the final decision regarding local Council is bound by State and Commonwealth No matters and land use rests with the Mosman Council and legislation in land use management. Within the not State Government. draft LSPS, Planning Priority 2 is to work Mosman Council must engage better with stakeholders together with Government agencies and other on local land use, parking (sensors), infrastructure, stakeholders to promote good outcomes for community centres, roads and traffic. Currently Council is Mosman. out of touch. A Community Participation Plan has been Concerns about Mosman Duty Planner and having to be prepared by Council and reported to the on ‘right side’ of duty planner. November 2019 Council Meeting for adoption. This outlines Council’s consultation on statutory land use planning matters. Council’s Community Engagement Strategy details consultation on other matters. Council provides a Duty Planner service weekdays 8.30-10.30am where customers can discuss any planning enquiry. Typical enquiries include what landowners can build on their land, concerns about development on a neighbouring property, and understanding State and local planning policy. Information
68
Page 120 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? provided may not always meet customer expectations, but Council is bound by State and local plans and legislation. 531 5715780 Marilyn Mosman Strongly object to development of Woolworths. Would be Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ramage Junction out of character with existing small shops, Mosman submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket already has adequate supermarkets, traffic and trucks would cause disruptions and it will destroy Mosman Village. 532 5715792 Susan Mosman Concern and opposed to Woolworths acquiring properties Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hartigan Junction with intention of developing a supermarket. Traffic is submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket already at a gridlock. Council needs to change legislation to prevent such developments, save Mosman Village and to save small shop owners and the community. 533 5715795 Marita Port Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 534 5715798 James and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jillian Junction submission #2. Mortimer supermarket (Mosman) 535 5715799 Belinda Reid Mosman Mosman is already well served by supermarkets, do not Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction need a Woolworths. Bulk and scale of the development submission #2. supermarket would have adverse visual impact, would disrupt small businesses and cause more traffic gridlock. It would not maintain village atmosphere and would result in increased shop vacancies. 536 5715806 Denise Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Sheridan Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 537 5715814 Jennifer Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jefferys Junction Have ample supermarkets with Aldi, IGAs and Harris submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Farm 538 5715816 Jess Hanning Mosman Support LSPS vision to maintain village atmosphere, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to T Junction utilise Spit Junction as main local centre and require submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket infrastructure to support any development. Suggest the LSPS rule out development such as the proposed Woolworths altogether as existing infrastructure cannot support it. Opposed to Woolworths as Mosman is well served by existing supermarkets and retailers, it would impact village atmosphere, increase congestion and result in closu581 ocal businesses. Small businesses promote personal relationships between proprietors and customers. 539 5715820 Lyn O'Neill Mosman Village Atmosphere - Need to retain small local Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to
69
Page 121 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Undisclosed) Junction businesses and not allow multi level shopping centres. submission #2. supermarket Traffic & Traffic – Crucial issue that needs to remain a priority. Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Transport Ensure there are options for children and people to walk submission #3. and cycle main streets. Open Space & Parkland – Greenspaces need to continue to be valued Planning Priority 14 relates to land and water- Yes – Some revision to Sustainability and protected. based recreation. The challenges of managing improve clarity and Sporting Facilities – Important to ensure local sporting open space demands (passive v active use) reference Council’s clubs can operate and access are noted in the rationale, as is implementation plans within budget. Action 2 refers to Council’s Action 2 implementation plans. Housing Spit Junction as main hub – recent developments have Refer to response to submission #601. Refer to response to worked well to increase capacity and variety for residents. submission #601. Other Facilities – Important to ensure there are community Planning Priority 3 is to provide a range of No facilities suitable for all types of residents facilities and services to meet community needs, and foster a culturally rich, creative and socially connected Mosman community. 540 5715969 John Mosman Extremely opposed to Woolworth Development. It would Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Tidmarsh Junction have a markedly deleterious effect on the village submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket atmosphere. No need as already have a large shopping complex at Spit Junction. 541 5715970 Michael & Mosman The intended Woolworths shopping development will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kathryn Kulic Junction destroy the Mosman shopping precinct and the village submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket atmosphere. It will create even more traffic and will affect the surrounding amenities. Our village shopping precinct will be shattered. Do NOT allow the Woolworths overdevelopment to proceed in our village. 542 5715971 Libby Glenn Mosman Council needs to justify its support for Woolworths which Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction would destroy Mosman’s village atmosphere and submission #2. supermarket shopping environment, impinge on ease of movement with increased traffic and cause the closure of many small businesses. Surely the preservation of the essence of Mosman should be the Council’s priority, not its destruction. 543 5715972 Karyn West Mosman Woolworths would erode the village ambience. The Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction multitude of little shops make the precinct pleasant. There submission #2. supermarket are plenty of food shops, especially at Bridgepoint. 544 5715973 Keep Our Mosman Woolworths is a threat to the village lifestyle and must be Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Village Junction stopped. Majority of residents to not want it. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 545 5715974 Michael Botto Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Do not understand the need as there are two Woolworths submission #2. supermarket within a 5 minute drive. Destroying the RSL will remove job opportunities, and sponsorship and support for
70
Page 122 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? community events. 546 5715977 Judith Mosman Extremely concerned about the possibility that Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Maclachlan Junction Woolworths may be planning to erect a large-scale submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket supermarket. Already have several supermarkets and another one is unnecessary and would affect the village atmosphere, heritage values and add to traffic congestion. 547 5715978 Amber Mosman Opposed to Woolworths. Proximity to local schools is Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ruberry Junction concerning considering the increased traffic congestion, submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket additional pollution and large trucks which are a safety risk. It would also impact local businesses. 548 5715979 Damian Hout Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 549 5715980 Tetsuji Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Kusaka Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 550 5715981 Natalie Jarvis Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 551 5715982 Denise Mosman Opposed to Woolworths development in Mosman as the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction size and scale would destroy local character, it is nearby submission #2. supermarket a school, additional traffic would be disastrous, local businesses would be destroyed and Mosman’s heritage value would be destroyed. 552 5715983 Selina Mosman Vehemently opposed to a large-scale supermarket at Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Jackson Junction either Mosman Village or in the Spit Junction area. It submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket would destroy the local character - the individuality - and the variety of shops. It would also drastically increase traffic both local and by large delivery trucks past our local schools. 553 5715984 Jacqui Logan- Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Powell Junction No need for a large scale supermarket as the area is well submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket supported with goods, services and amenities. 554 5715985 Michelle Mosman Oppose development as it would destroy the village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Camilleri Junction character, bring traffic chaos, compromise pedestrian submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket safety of students, drive local shops out of business, reduce variety of goods, the variety and quality of food and goods sold locally, impact neighbouring residents’ quality of life, diminish the village’s architectural heritage and the Mosman Club. 555 5715986 Julie Jing Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket
71
Page 123 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 556 5715987 Elouise Monck Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 557 5715988 Laine M Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. It will take away Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction from the village atmosphere of Mosman and will create submission #2. supermarket further traffic chaos. We already have traffic issues in Mosman. Two Woolworths close to Mosman are suitably located. 558 5715989 Olga L. Munoz Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 559 5715990 Carolyn and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Ken Junction submission #2. Washburn supermarket (Mosman) 560 5715991 Judith Mosman Against any supermarket or large department store within Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Karaolis Junction the Mosman village. The IGA and small local shops submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket adequately service the suburb, as do supermarkets in nearby suburbs. A supermarket would destroy the atmosphere, outlook and create an even greater driving and parking nightmare. 561 5715992 Andrew Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Karellas Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 562 5715994 Rosie Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Sprange Junction Traffic problem is a problem now a development would submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket add to the chaos. Not a good environment for students from the two schools nearby, especially during construction. 563 5715995 Lorna Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Thompson Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 564 5715996 Len and Mosman Strongly opposed to a Woolworths development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Catherine De Junction Mosman as it would mean the destruction of the shopping submission #2. Lorenzo supermarket precinct, would adversely affect small businesses, there (Undisclosed) are already supermarkets nearby and increased traffic would make congestion catastrophic. 565 5716051 Laurie, Doug Mosman Very much against such a large supermarket in our area. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to & family Junction The traffic would be horrid, large trucks at night and so submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket many small businesses closing down. 566 5716052 Laurie Mosman No huge Woolworths in the village, there are enough Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction traffic problems without this development, there are more submission #2. supermarket than enough shops in the vicinity, it would impact local small business owners.
72
Page 124 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 567 5716074 Jackie Horan Mosman Object to any big development in Mosman Village. The Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction traffic alone is cause to protect the shopping strip which submission #2. supermarket consists of small businesses which will be impacted by such a development. 568 5716075 Lidia Nicoletti Mosman Opposed to a new Woolworths in Mosman Village. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Already well catered for by supermarkets. Traffic is submission #2. supermarket already congested and this large-scale retail development will create more traffic chaos. Need to keep our unique village as it is. 569 5716089 Erik Stark Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Cremorne Junction submission #2. Point) supermarket 570 5716187 Janet Tilsley Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 571 5716189 Gary Tilsley Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 572 5723212 William and Heritage More needs to be done to protect Mosman’s heritage. Refer to response to submission #12. Refer to response to 5716260 Jacqueline Federation type homes are being demolished, submission #12. Tuck streetscapes are under attack. Need to preserve non- (Mosman) heritage protected historic/federation buildings. Open Space & Need more consideration for trees, tree stock is under Refer to response to submission #292. Refer to response to Sustainability threat. Cutting down trees for redevelopments must be Pruning street trees beneath wires is managed submission #292. discouraged, even when replacements are ordered by the NSW Government. developers cannot be relied upon. Recommend heritage listing identified trees. State Transit Authority has chopped down trees for B Line buses (particularly on Military Rd near Prince St), suggest STA replacing with trees of similar maturity. Other Private Certification is tainted and that development plans Refer to response to submission # 352. Refer to response to and consultation should be returned to Councils and the In regards to firefighting and setbacks, submission # 352. DA system revived for all of Mosman. Council should development is subject to fire safety standards lobby the Government on the issue. set by the Commonwealth Government within Concerns regarding minimal setbacks from boundaries the Building Code of Australia (BCA) which is impacting firefighting access. contained within the National Construction Code (NCC). 573 5716200 Frances Mosman Would be supportive of a Woolworths supermarket. It Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McMahon Junction would be a valuable amenity for a growing population and submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket a better range of goods than existing shops. It could increase parking availability and it would serve local people so there would not be an influx of traffic from other areas. 574 5716202 Bob Meyer Mosman Concerned with Woolworths as they have purchased Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction several properties. The area where Woolworths wish to
73
Page 125 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? (Mosman) supermarket develop relies on a considerable amount of parking and submission #2. deliveries. The road network cannot support this and would put pressure to ban long-term on street parking. Additional traffic generated by Woolworths would inhibit the road network, particularly for buses that service the area. It could cause considerable congestion and impact access to Mosman’s facilities. The scale of the development is in conflict with the low-rise village character and the single trader style local shops. 575 5716228 Rob Mosman Totally against plans (present or future) by Woolworths to Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Clemesha Junction redevelop RSL club site. Negative issues would outweigh submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket any benefits. It would destroy the local businesses operating in the area, change the unique character of the area and bring excessive traffic and congestion. No need as Woolworths operate 2 supermarkets nearby. 576 5716253 Roger Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Marshall SC Junction Already well serviced by supermarkets and local shops. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Local shops would be adversely affected. 577 5716282 Kelly Latimer Mosman Very concerned about Woolworths it would be a detriment Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction to the mix of wonderful food shops and traders along this submission #2. supermarket stretch. Concerned about increased traffic and congestion. Bridge Point has adequate supermarkets. Would like to retain heritage shopfronts as they make the village unique. 578 5727021 Scots Kirks Mosman Strongly object to a Woolworths development in Mosman Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Presbyterian Junction Village. There are already sufficient shopping submission #2. Church of supermarket opportunities around. The increased traffic generated by Australia the development and proximity to sensitive uses, such as schools, parks and childcare, will endanger pedestrians. 579 5716285 Margaret and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to David Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 580 5716323 Ron Moir Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 581 5716355 Rosemary and Traffic & Extended clear way times should not be supported. If Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to Geoff Adams Transport tunnel in constructed, level of service (including bus submission #3. (Mosman) lanes) should be retained on Military Rd. Housing Amalgamation of multiple lots into one for a single Refer to response to submission #515. Refer to response to dwelling and redevelopment of multi-dwelling housing to submission #515. single dwelling should be prohibited. LEP should provide opportunities for small Torrens Title lots. DCPs should be implemented consistently. Mosman Would support introduction of stronger planning, heritage Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction and design controls for Mosman Village (including
74
Page 126 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? supermarket requiring awnings). Military Road conservation area submission #2. needs to protect buildings and also the style/format of shopping. Open Space & Scenic Protection Area exclusion should be made Refer to response to submission: Refer to relevant submission Sustainability permanent. #349 (scenic protection area), listed in adjacent column. Street tree planting to consider underground services. #292 (trees), All open spaces/parks should be retained, artificial turf #539 (open space), should not be considered, more focus on women’s sports #530 (stormwater quality), facilities. #39 (solar panels). Ensure more is done to maintain stormwater infrastructure. Increase use of solar panels on Council facilities Other Council should work collaboratively with agencies to Planning Priorities 2 and 14 note collaboration No protect public land. opportunities for public land, such as Sydney Community Participation Plan should align with IAP2. Harbour Federation Trust Land and National Parks. Explore opportunities of Spit Junction. The Community Participation Plan was prepared under NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Guidelines, and reported to Council at its November 2019 meeting. Opportunities at Spit Junction are noted within Planning Priority 7. 582 5716420 Elizabeth Mosman Strongly oppose Woolworths on Military Road within Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McWilliams Junction Mosman. It would not integrate successfully with the submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket village and there is chronic traffic build up on Military Road. Residents are well served by two supermarkets at Spit Junction and two Woolworths stores at Neutral Bay. 583 5716421 Stevan & Mosman Strongly opposed to a large scale supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lilyana Vrcelj Junction development, such as Woolworths, anywhere in Mosman. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Will permanently damage the village feel, would cause traffic congestion and disruption, would be dangerous for local schools, childcares and aged care facilities. Mosman does not need another supermarket, especially one that is so large. Many small businesses would be destroyed and there would be many vacant shops. 584 5716443 Nicholas and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Rebecca Junction submission #2. Calfas supermarket (Mosman) 585 5716523 Michael Mosman Endorse Planning Priority 6 – Adhering to this policy Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gammans Junction would prevent the rumoured Woolworths. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket
75
Page 127 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Economy & Recommend working with Taronga Zoo on managing the Refer to response to submission #642. Refer to response to Tourism ever increasing commercialisation of the zoo submission #642. (accommodation, concerts, vivid, etc.). Traffic from zoo is congesting local road network. 586 5716533 Joy Bruce Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction No justification with two Woolworths a couple of submission #2. supermarket kilometres away. 587 5716553 Barry Woods Mosman Woolworths in Mosman Village would destroy the village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction atmosphere forever. It size is out of context with existing submission #2. supermarket small shops, traffic congestion would become infinitely worse and liveability would be degraded. Open Space & Middle Head is an important environmental and heritage Middle Head is managed under the Sydney Yes – Action 4 included for Sustainability area and must not be turned into a sporting complex. Harbour Federation Trust’s Recreation Strategy Planning Priority 14 2019. Planning Priority 14, Action 4, is to collaborate with the Trust and NPWS to ensure coordinated outcomes for recreational spaces at Middle and Georges Heads. 588 5716570 Dr Christopher Mosman Opposed to a large scale supermarket development in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Poon Junction Mosman Village, it is unnecessary, will drastically add to submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket congestion and increase danger to road users and pedestrians (particularly students and elderly). 589 5716592 Cynthia Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Haskell Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 590 5716593 Hilary Mosman Supportive of plan, particularly for the protection of the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Gallagher Junction area from overdevelopment. We do not need large submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket supermarkets pushing out our smaller retailers, the area in general is already very well supplied with nearby large supermarkets and it is so important to maintain a sense of belonging that smaller retailers offer. 591 5716609 MaryAnn Apte Mosman Vehemently opposed to any proposed opening of a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Woolworths store in Mosman. Negative impacts of the submission #2. supermarket potential development are increased road congestion in the area and on Military Rd due to car park and delivery trucks, loss of the Mosman Club, overdevelopment of residential properties on the proposed site and loss of small community focused retailers. 592 5716651 Barry Mosman Opposed to a proposed Woolworths supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McWilliams Junction development in Military Road, Mosman. It is unnecessary submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket as there are already supermarkets at Bridge Point and Neutral Bay. Traffic is heavy and would be worsened. Parking availability would be reduced. The village character and amenity of the area would be adversely impacted.
76
Page 128 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 593 5716652 Reg Elliott and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Dr Jan Elliott Junction Increased traffic would be a risk to school children. It submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket would not fit in with local character. Mosman is already well served by larger retailers at Bridgepoint. 594 5716689 D Multari Mosman Emphatically against Woolworths supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction development in Mosman Village. submission #2. supermarket 595 5716731 Helene Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lindholm Junction Need to protect the village feel and all the local submission #2. (Cremorne supermarket businesses. Point ) 596 5716739 Paul Mosman Strongly protest the possibility of a large supermarket Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Nankervis Junction development by Woolworths. The area is already submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket crowded, traffic and parking are constant problems. Various larger retailers service the community already. 597 5716823 Emma Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Anderson Junction submission #2. (Cremorne) supermarket Other Mosman High School is at capacity and could benefit by Noted. This is a matter for the NSW No expanding into the Mosman Club site if sold off. Government (Department of Education). 598 5716824 Mayling Mosman Strongly against any proposal to build a large Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Hargreaves Junction supermarket in Mosman Village. No need for it and extra submission #2. and Sam supermarket traffic would worsen congestion, noise and dust. Burgess OAM Housing Appreciate tendency for mixed use building (shop-top Planning Priority 6 is to ensure that building Yes – Additional text added (Mosman) housing). Long and thin building designs are poky, use of design and construction is of high quality, and to Planning Priority 5 light wells above 1 floor unpleasant. maintains resident amenity. Action 1 is to explaining the diversity of We would like a greater variety of housing types and consider planning controls within MLEP 2012 housing types facilitated sizes, and tenures, and a greater variety of retail (different and DCPs to ensure high quality construction under MLEP 2012. sizes). Four storeys along Military Road, could be taller if and design. stepped back. MLEP 2012 facilitates a broad range of housing types, such as semis, detached dwelling houses, multi dwelling housing, shop-top housing, and the like. This is noted in Planning Priority 5. For the reasons given in the Council report, amending MLEP 2012 to facilitate greater density is not supported at this time. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 599 5716825 Brian Heritage The following building should be added to Heritage Refer to response to submission #268. Refer to response to 5716834 Halstead Register if not already there: The Horse Stable - This submission #268. (Mosman) restored building was the original stable on the Lennon Estate which included the Allan Border Oval and all the
77
Page 129 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? area through to Belmont Road .Circa 1870. Recommend a Demolition Report be included in the requirements of a DA for improve conservation of historic character. Housing Progress towards 300 dwelling increase target should be Council monitors dwelling approvals and No reported to Councillors. MLPP should produce quarterly completions, and provides information to report to be considered by Councillors. Councillors as appropriate. Provide details of issues of DA determined by MLPP or Planning Priority 6 is to ensure building design LEC in past 5 years, outlining how the LSPS will and construction is of high quality and overcome those issues. maintains resident amenity. Actions within this priority include to consider planning controls within the MLEP 2012 and DCPs to ensure high quality construction and design. Findings of LEC cases and determination of MLPP would be a consideration in this. Other Request chart to clarify where LSPS fits in with Council’s The draft LSPS is a pivotal tool and will shape Yes – a new paragraph is other documents and the planning framework. Provide how Mosman’s LEP and DCP evolve to reflect included within the details of legislation that overrule the LSPS. Explain the Council’s and community’s vision for Introduction to explain the private certification/complying development in document. Mosman. Notwithstanding, under the NSW relationship of the LSPS Commit to timing for creation of Community Participation planning system, the provisions of an LEP and with the LEP and NSW Plan. DCP may be overridden by State policy. planning legislation The Council’s Community Participation Plan has been prepared by Council and reported to the November 2019 Council Meeting for adoption. 600 5716826 Jannana Mosman Strongly oppose a large development on Military Road in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Schneider Junction the heart of Mosman. Proximity to two large public submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket schools is madness. Currently have more than an adequate amount of grocery options. 601 5712029 Macken Housing Support the main priorities outlined in the Statement, Within Spit Junction, the current maximum No Planning however, believe Council should have greater ambition permitted building height under MLEP 2012 is Solutions, on for its community. Environmental and historical built form 15 metres (5 storeys) with a maximum behalf of is the main constraint for housing and employment. Need permitted floor space ratio (FSR) of 2.5:1, owner 2-6 Spit for greater density development, particularly at Spit although a FSR incentives clause in the LEP Road and Junction. Recommend taller building heights (e.g. at least (clause 4.4B) allows an FSR up to 3:1 to 645-658 max. height of 21m; 7-9 storeys) to encourage growth. encourage the amalgamation of sites and good Military Road Consider outlining timetable for finalisation of the new design. There is the capacity for development LEP for the community. within the centre, as many existing buildings are well below the allowable height limit at two Should aim for more than a 0.3% p.a. population storeys. increase. Limited growth in housing will undermine economic and social vitality. Consider easing controls on For the reasons given in the Council report, the provision of ‘granny flats’ and supporting other amending MLEP 2012 land to facilitate greater housing formats such as seniors housing, key worker, density is not supported at this time. Housing build to rent, smaller lot size, etc. need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported
78
Page 130 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? to Council in 2020. 602 5716827 Joanne Wright Mosman Completely opposed to a large scale supermarket, Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction namely Woolworths, in Mosman/Village or any such a submission #2. supermarket development. It would destroy the local Mosman character with increased traffic, removal of character buildings and retail diversity. There is no need for a large supermarket. Support Council changing planning controls to restrict the size of retail premises. 603 5716828 Belinda Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Parker Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 604 5716829 Jason Tellett Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction submission #2. supermarket 606 5716830 WR Gray Mosman No consumer value in a large supermarket being plonked Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Cremorne) Junction in the centre of Mosman Village when the village is submission #2. supermarket already very well served by similar. Keep Mosman charming and stress free. 607 5716831 John and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Louise Junction submission #2. Boutagy supermarket (Mosman) Housing Mosman is becoming an over developed suburb losing its Refer to response to submission #90, 156 and Refer to response to desirable suburban characteristics. Mega style 186. submission #90, 156 and development negatively impacting the suburb. Heavy 186. traffic, especially heavy construction vehicles, is making Mosman undesirable. Population of Mosman does not need to keep increasing. Mosman does not need more non-essential or inappropriate development. 608 5716832 Fiona Mosman Grave concerns about the accommodation of any Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to McLaughlin Junction additional large scale supermarkets in Mosman Village, submission #2. and Philip supermarket specifically the proposed Woolworths. Concerns include Swaine increased traffic, destruction of historical and competitive (Mosman) pressure on existing small businesses. Extensive community consultation is required before considering such large-scale retailers. 609 5716833 Catherine and Mosman Opposed to a large-scale supermarket such as a Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Daniel North Junction Woolworths in Mosman /Village. Concerns include submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket increased traffic and congestion, pedestrian safety and decreased car parking availability. There is not a need for more retail as there already a lot of vacant shops. Support Council changing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises in Mosman Junction. 610 5716835 Robert Mosman Concerned at the potential for inappropriate development Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Bagnall Junction to detrimentally affect the character and amenity of submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Mosman. Council should limit the size of retail premises
79
Page 131 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? to a maximum gross floor area of 500m2 for Military Road and even less for other business centres. Opposed a large scale supermarket or other large retail business as it would negatively impact village atmosphere and drive out smaller businesses. Housing Another issue is existing use rights being exploited by ‘Existing Use Rights’ legislation is within the No developers to build high rise and medium density housing Environmental Planning and Assessment Act in low density zones. 1979, and not within Council’s control. Proposed development using this legislation is not common in Mosman. 611 5716836 Julie Goodsir Open Space & Any major planned development by Council, such as Refer to response to submission #587. Refer to response to (Mosman) Sustainability synthetic turf on ovals and/or the installation of lights on submission #587. these Commonwealth heritage lands, must come under the EPBC Act. It is prohibited to take an action that is likely to have a significant impact on matters protected by the Act, unless they have the approval of the Australian Environment Minister. 612 5716837 Jimmy Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Aschner Junction submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket 613 5716840 Martin Skipper Mosman Oppose the proposed Woolworth development on Military Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction Road. Currently a shop vacancy rate of about 4-6% along submission #2. supermarket Military Road. A Woolworths would certainly mean more shops would close. Mosman already has adequate shops at Spit Junction. A large shopping centre would ruin village atmosphere and have significant traffic implications. 614 5716853 Marilyn J Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Capper and Junction submission #2. Stephen J supermarket Capper (Mosman) 615 5716888 Malcolm Mosman Consider ways to enhance and improve the “village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Clyde Junction character” of Mosman Junction not just “retain” character. submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket The Council should take a pro-active approach in dealing with Woolworths with the objective of jointly developing a “win-win” plan. There are other more significant factors that can improve Mosman’s village character than a Woolworths. Housing Whilst the percentage of over 65 year olds in Mosman is Ageing population - Refer to response to Refer to response to high, I did not see this factor being significantly addressed submission #258. submission #258. in LSPS. Technology is referenced in Planning Priority 9 Additional text included for There should be more consideration of the impact of re parking and transport. Planning Priority 9 to possible technology on Mosman society. For the reasons given in the Council report, reference Council initiatives Disapprove of further growth given already high density of amending MLEP 2012 to facilitate greater in parking technology.
80
Page 132 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? suburb. density is not supported at this time. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 616 5715284 Mosman Heritage Support a strong vision of protecting, enhancing and Refer to response to submission #12. Refer to response to Historical maintaining the heritage and historical character from all submission #12. Society eras. More attention to the historical value of non-listed buildings. Open Space & Support Council seeking more permanent protection Noted. This is addressed within the draft LSPS Yes – Some amendment to Sustainability measures for Mosman’s Scenic Protection Area. in Planning Priority 13. Planning Priority 13 to provide clarity and give an example of how ongoing protection of the SPA may be achieved through rezoning Mosman Support Council changing planning controls to limit the Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction size of retail premises in Mosman Junction/Village. submission #2. supermarket Concerned that large-scale retail will destroy local historical character and residential amenity with traffic congestion and a reduction in the variety of shops. Housing Concerns about developers not adhering to the LSPS, Refer to response to submission #599. Refer to response to such as “two storeys along the foreshore slopes” and “a submission #599. dominance of landscape over built form will be enhanced” Stricter processes must be in place to avoid bypassing. 617 5716904 Nicholas Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Larcos Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 619 5717029 Kate Guilfoyle Mosman Object to any proposal for development in the nature of Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction that proposed by Woolworths. Small shops are essential submission #2. supermarket to a community and would be destroyed by a supermarket. Other concerns are traffic, sterile environment, property values and health issues. Request the Council to persist in implementing planning controls to limit the size of retail premises to small shops only in the Mosman area. 620 5717142 Peter Cripps Mosman Object to Woolworths as it would destroy village Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Cremorne Junction atmosphere, increase traffic, is too large and would result submission #2. Point) supermarket in closure of local shops which are necessary to maintain village concept. 621 5717294 Janet Flint Mosman Object to the Woolworths proposal on Military Rd. It will Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction destroy the village atmosphere. submission #2. supermarket 623 5717493 Elisabeth Mosman Object to Woolworths proposal. It would kill the communal Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Roden Junction village atmosphere, there is not the infrastructure to submission #2. (Undisclosed) supermarket support it, would result in loss of small businesses and
81
Page 133 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? would increase traffic. 624 5717572 Margaret Mosman Object to plans by Woolworths. Mosman is well provided Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Lorang Junction for by smaller shops, increase traffic would result in submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket chaos, unique village character would be spoiled and it would dominate the streetscape. 625 5717687 Beverly Rodin Mosman Strongly object to Woolworths erecting a mega store in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Mosman. It will completely ruin the village, increased submission #2. supermarket traffic would be a problem and there is no need for another supermarket. 627 5718268 Jane and Mosman Strongly object to the proposed Woolworths development. Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Peter Junction It will destroy the village character, have a significant submission #2. Roennfeldt supermarket visual impact, increase traffic and congestion and (Mosman) threaten the livelihood of many small local businesses. 629 5718269 Thérèse Mosman Object to Woolworths as proposed location is not suitable Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Burnett Junction due to traffic, heavy vehicle access and restricting access submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket to the zoo and beaches. Would be more suitable on a main road (i.e. Spit/Military Rd Corridor). 630 5718270 Diane Rail Mosman Object to large Woolworths in Mosman. Traffic and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Undisclosed) Junction congestion would be unacceptable. Holt Ave is already submission #2. supermarket experiencing difficulties. 633 5718271 Andrew and Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4). Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Pam Laidlaw Junction submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket 634 5718528 Saskia van Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Loon Junction The current vibe of the village is what the community submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket wants. There are already two Woolworths in Neutral Bay. 635 5718681 Susan Warda Mosman Pro-forma submission (see submission #4) and; Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction Disappointing to see several small shops in the Village submission #2. supermarket have closed in past years. 637 5719582 Tracy Noon Traffic & Traffic is increasingly negatively impacting on the Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to (Mosman) Transport liveability of Mosman. submission #3. Mosman Very opposed to a Woolworths, or other large retailer, in Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction Mosman Village or Spit Junction due to increased traffic submission #2. supermarket congestion and parking issues. Community's needs are well met with shops in Mosman and nearby suburbs. If increasing population requires, shops should be tucked away (like at Bridgepoint), retaining the character/period facades of Mosman. 638 5721101 Kate Ward Other Mosman Junction could be made even more attractive Mosman’s Business Centres DCP 2012 No. (Mosman) with uniform awnings and a consistent colour scheme. contains urban design controls for Mosman and This would increase property values. Spit Junctions. Undergrounding wires would allow for more street trees, Within Planning Priority 8, Action 4 is to alternatively trees could be loped from the top to grow encourage the repair and maintenance of
82
Page 134 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? horizontally. buildings within the Military Road HCA (which New apartments on Spit Road should be built with encompasses Mosman Junction) and to refine uniform design and colour schemes to improve aesthetic urban design criteria for infill development. appeal. Mosman’s DCPs include a requirement for underground wiring for certain new developments. Tree lopping around wires is undertaken by State Government contractors. 639 5722881 Rob & Sue Mosman Opposed to Woolworths in Mosman. It would have Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Henderson- Junction negative impacts on the village and increased submission #2. Smart supermarket traffic/congestion (Mosman) 640 5727434 R Hartley Mosman Object to a Woolworths in Mosman Village. Has Council Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to (Mosman) Junction considered alternative locations? It could be collocated submission #2. supermarket with other supermarkets at Bridgepoint. 645 5720692 Mosman Open Space & Need to strictly apply planning controls to maintain Refer to response to submission: Refer to relevant submission Parks & Sustainability dominance of landscape over built form. Develop more #349 (scenic protection area and listed in adjacent column. Bushland habitat links. Achieve a permanent exclusion from the bushland), Housing Code for the Scenic Protection Area. #292 (trees, habitat links, walking tracks), Introduce a policy to ensure unmade roads will not be #539, 502 and 587 (open space), sold, leased or developed. #530 (stormwater quality), Enhance urban canopy by choosing trees that will not #39 (solar panels), result in vandalism from neighbours, plan street trees that do not interfere with services and underground wires to avoid unsightly pruning. Make Council permission required for pruning trees on public land and must be performed by approve arborists. Recreation facility upgrades should be environmentally sustainable (no artificial turf). Do not compromise ecological integrity. Stormwater and grey water should be harvested to irrigate parks. Encourage more frequent cleaning of stormwater pits. Protect bushland as it creates heat relief for surrounding areas. Existing paths should be maintained and upgrading before installing new paths. New paths should not compromise bushland. Housing Local Housing Strategy should consider balance between Refer to response to submission #90. Refer to response to built and natural environment, numbers not the only submission #90. consideration, where suitable smaller dwelling units may be more desirable than single large dwelling. Mosman Planning controls could be developed to enhance Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Junction Mosman’s village character. Street characteristics could submission #2. supermarket be better maintained with addition LEP and DCP provisions.
83
Page 135 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Category Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? Heritage Aboriginal heritage sites identified in the Aboriginal Refer to response to submission #502. Refer to response to Heritage Study 2005 should be protected with high submission #502. importance, consult with Aboriginal organisations to promote heritage. Support collaboration with Aboriginal communities and increasing awareness (interpretation, guided tours, displays, etc.) Other Collaborate with other agencies to ensure public lands Refer to response to submission #581. Refer to response to and assets are managed to benefit the community. submission #581. Recommend the use of the International Association for Public Participation Spectrum process for Community Participation Plan. 647 5734398 Edeltraud Mosman Object to any changes to the lovely village feel and Refer to response to submission #2. Refer to response to Aquilina Junction amenity of Mosman Village. submission #2. (Mosman) supermarket Apart from that, traffic is already extremely dense and no further large development which would further exacerbate the traffic problems should enter the village . 648 5722750 HDC (Haskew Housing Seek to initiate a Planning Proposal to amend Mosman The subject site is located on the southern side No de Chalain) LEP 2012 for 13 properties (40-60 Ourimbah Rd, 24 Bond of Ourimbah Road between Bond and Planning – St and 29 & 31 Rosebery St) to increase the max. Rosebery Streets. The current zoning, on behalf of permitted building height and floor space ratio to facilitate maximum permitted building height and FSR of landowners of a greater density of housing on the land, as follows: the site reflects Council’s long-established 40-60 - Increase building height from 8.5 metres to 15 metres, residential strategy. Within Mosman’s R3 zoned Ourimbah Rd, and lands, there are four levels of density 24 Bond St - Increase floor space ratio from 0.7:1 to 2:1. depending on proximity to Spit-Military Roads and Spit Junction – and 29 & 31 The site is already zoned R3 Medium Density Housing. Rosebery St. The proposal would be suitable and is not limited by site FSR 0.55:1, 0.6:1 or 0.7:1, with height 8.5m, constraints. It would be consistent with state strategic and planning, and would bring about significant urban renewal FSR 1:1 with height 11m. and amenity improvements. The subject site currently has the second highest density level at 0.7:1, suitable to its location. The highest density level is typically only applied to land along S-M Roads. The FSR and height increase requested in this submission is beyond Council’s density grading for R3 zoned land. For the reasons given in the Council report, amending MLEP 2012 land to facilitate greater density is not supported at this time. Housing need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020.
84
Page 136 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
3. Industry Group Submissions (9 submissions)
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Key Issue/s Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? 446 5714404 Australian Open Space & Slacklining community is growing and would like to develop Planning Priority 14 relates to land and water- No Slackline Sustainability a policy for slacklining with Council to encourage access. based recreation. The use of open space is Association Consistent with objective 31 of Greater Sydney Region managed under Council’s Open Space and (QLD) Plan. Recommended to include priority to support a variety Recreational Needs Assessment, and Open of recreational and passive uses that reflect the changing Space Asset Management Plan. needs of the community when planning for existing and New and revised Plans of Management to new open space. ensure open spaces meet community needs is noted as Action 1 of PP14.
618 5715311 Shelter NSW Housing A detailed submission urging Council to research the levels The availability of, and options for, housing for Yes – Minor amendment to of housing stress in the LGA and recognise the need for very-low, low and moderate income households Planning Priority 5 to note affordable housing (AH) and how it is critical social and in Mosman will be further considered as part of that options for AH in economic infrastructure. Specifically, the submission seeks the local housing strategy to be reported to Mosman will be considered in that the LSPS be amended to: Council in 2020. Opportunities to collaborate collaboration with North Include reference to the Liveable Housing Guidelines with other North District councils, and with the District Councils, and further NSW Government, will be explored. Strengthen language to ensure the built environment explored in the local housing strategy. and amenity are designed to be universally accessible, The North District Plan identifies the need for and be more explicit about a commitment to social further work by the Greater Sydney Also to expand on Action 3 re diversity; Commission and NSW Department of Planning, advocate to the NSW Remove actions to maximise public car parking and Industry and Environment to support Government for a district increase parking required for medium density housing; mechanisms for the delivery of AH. and/or regional-wide State that the local housing strategy will consider the Within the draft LSPS, Planning Priority 5 approach to AH, and remove need for AH including specific targets; responds to housing. It notes that options for reference to key workers so Commit that any action seeking the permanent AH in Mosman will be considered within a as to not limit the scope of exclusion of parts of the LGA from the Medium Density broader District context in collaboration with consideration. Code is tied to detailed planning strategies regarding North District Councils, and further explored in how Mosman Council will regulate infill development; the local housing strategy. Add actions for Council to Action 3 of PP5 is to collaborate with North investigate/develop/undertake: District Councils to consider options for AH in o an AH strategy; the District, and advocate to the NSW o an AH contribution scheme under SEPP 70 for Government for a district and/or regional-wide Spit Junction and Military Road Corridor; approach to AH. o exemption from section 7.11 and/or section 7.12 contributions for AH development led by a Community Housing Provider (CHP); o other planning mechanisms to facilitate the delivery of AH (e.g. VPA’s, 7.11 contributions). o further advocacy to NSW and Australian Govt’s for more social and AH o tackle AH issues at the metro and regional level. 622 5715781 St Vincent De Housing The draft LSPS does not acknowledge housing Refer to response to submission #618. Refer to response to Paul Society affordability for very low income earners. The LSPS needs submission #618. NSW to recognise the need for affordable and social housing, champion options for housing affordability, acknowledge Council's ability to implement planning led affordable
85
Page 137 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Key Issue/s Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? housing (SEPP 70, VPAs, and 7.11 contributions). 626 5716219 Cancer Other Council can play an important role in reducing the risk of Refer to response to submission #632. Refer to response to Council NSW skin cancer of its residents through planning and designing submission #632. shade. Recommend including in LSPS content that supports shade as a planning priority for the LGA. 628 5716422 Ethos Urban Housing Support Council’s vision for growth and change. Suggest 8 Spit Junction - Refer to response to submission No. on behalf of storey limit on Military Road Corridor (west) as 5 does not #601. Mirvac encourage amalgamation and redevelopment of sites. Along the Military Road corridor (west of Spit (property Suggest up to 8-10 storeys at Spit Junction and a new Junction), the current maximum permitted group) masterplan as area presents many opportunities. building height under MLEP 2012 ranges from Mixed-use precincts can be significant in delivering 11 to 15 metres, and FSR ranges from 1:1 to Council’s objectives by delivering housing supply, creating 2:1, depending on the land zoning. a 30-minute city and enabling smart jobs. Recommend For the reasons given in the Council report, balancing preserving character of sensitive areas with amending MLEP 2012 land to facilitate greater accommodating growth in key areas. density is not supported at this time. Housing Consider build to rent development models. need in Mosman will be considered in further detail in a local housing strategy to be reported to Council in 2020. 631 5716670 Community Housing Recommend improving LSPS by: Refer to response to submission #618. Refer to response to Housing • Identify affordable rental housing as a strategic priority submission #618. Industry • Acknowledge the economic and social benefits of Association affordable rental housing NSW • Acknowledge Greater Sydney Commission’s affordable housing targets • Commit to developing a local housing strategy which includes affordable rental housing • Identify mechanisms for delivering affordable rental housing through planning system and partnerships 636 5718612 Bridge Housing Mosman has a current shortfall of almost 7,750 affordable Refer to response to submission #618. Refer to response to Housing homes (set to rise to 11,600 by 2036). Less than 1% of submission #618. (NSW) total properties advertised are affordable. LSPS does not identify mechanisms to deliver and fund affordable housing (AH) and there is no discussion of AH needs in the LGA. LSPS limits centres to 5 storeys, limiting potential dwelling yield. It does not adequately consider variances to this to provide AH. Implies greater reliance on North District for AH. Seek that Council: Complete review on AH at the same time as preparation of the Local Housing Strategy. Introduce an AH contributions scheme as part of the upcoming LEP review. Collaborate with CHPs and other key stakeholders to investigate mechanisms to deliver AH in the LGA. Investigate opportunities to develop underutilised or
86
Page 138 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Key Issue/s Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? redundant Council assets for AH. Direct contributions secured by Council to CHP and State-government social and AH redevelopment projects. The submission lists very detailed actions is seeks the LSPS to include relating to AH, and strategies it seeks the LSPS or local housing strategy contain. These are essentially the same as those summarised in submission #618 above. 641 5717030 Sun Property Traffic & Support Council lobbying NSW Government for greater Refer to response to submission #3. Refer to response to (property Transport levels of Infrastructure. Beach Link can promote submission #3. developer and opportunities to enhance village character, look to investor) pedestrianize high street. High car dependency in Mosman. Need to better understand the matter by reviewing and re-preparing transport and mobility strategy, seeking to improve accessibility. Housing Encourage Council to consider priorities of NSW Ageing Refer to response to submission: Refer to relevant submission Strategy. Consider how future homes and infill #258 (housing for ageing population) listed in adjacent column. development can cater for an ageing population. Consult #598 and 599 (planning controls) residents and development community. #601 (Spit Junction) New development can be constrained by prescriptive controls. Encourage engaging with stakeholders to refine design controls. Properties at Spit Junction are highly fragmented - need to look at future character. Suggest Council adopt Walkable Neighbourhoods theme of District Plan and think widely for inspiration. Heritage Balance respectful maintenance of heritage assets whilst Refer to response to submission #12. Refer to response to remaining open minded about opportunities to enhance. submission #12. Open Space & Actions to protect, conserve and enhance the tree canopy, Refer to response to submission: Refer to relevant submission Sustainability landform, waterways and bushland are sound. #292 (trees), listed in adjacent column. Within the Scenic Protection Area, one size fits all #349 (scenic protection area), approach not suitable, encourage flexibility. #539 (open space), Encourage looking at improving accessibility to #39 (energy efficiency), recreational areas. The timing for flood planning will be dictated by Articulate initiatives re energy, water and waste efficiency. the NSW Government, as Council awaits Consider timeframes for flood planning and timing for relevant guidelines. intended planning amendments Other Priority 2 re collaboration is broad and may not deliver Collaboration opportunities are noted within Yes – collaboration good outcomes. Encourage Council to better define Planning Priority 2, and also as part of actions opportunities (future and outcomes and support with evidence. of other Planning Priorities within the draft existing) are noted within Encourage Council to consider priorities of NSW Small LSPS. actions throughout the draft Business Strategy. Bring forward proposed Business Planning Priority 11 addresses local LSPS. Additional actions Review to better understand local economy prior to businesses. Action 1 will consider the range of have been included to
87
Page 139 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Sub. ECM Doc. Name Key Issue/s Summary of Submission Council Planner Response Amendment to Draft # ID Mosman LSPS? amending land use zones. Suggest development business activities that occur within the Planning Priority 11 re the incentives in business zones to allow for business growth. municipality. The timing of this will depending night time economy and on resourcing availability. Other actions relate visitation events to the night time economy and visitation events. Clause 4.4B of MLEP 2012 applies to Spit Junction local centre. It contains an FSR incentive to encourage sites to amalgamate to achieve better design outcomes. 643 5718216 UDIA Housing Recommend: The draft LSPS must be reviewed every seven Refer to response to • The draft LSPS is regularly reviewed to ensure it remains years as per EP&A Act 1979. submission #186 and #618. appropriate for Mosman. Refer to response to submission #186 and • Council prepare a local housing strategy that sets #618. housing targets, including typologies. • Council review Housing Targets following the finalisation of the other district plans. • Council sets out an approach for new sites to be included. • Implement an Urban Development Program to deliver and monitoring growth, with clear accountabilities and in partnership with industry. • Council adopts an incentive-based approach for affordable housing in collaboration with industry. • Council seek to enable new housing typologies.
4. Public Meeting Summary The following table provides a transcript of questions asked, and Council response provided, at the public meeting held on 24 July 2019.
Speaker Name/ Question / Comment Key Issue/s Response by Council (given at the public meeting) # Address M1 Not Didn't notice any information in the LSPS about larger Mosman There is a market for large retailers including supermarkets and bulky good distributors seeking to Stated retail development in Mosman. Can you please provide Junction open large stores, some of which would like to open in Mosman. an update on the Woolworths development? supermarket Council is investigating limiting the size of retail stores to a maximum size of 500m2. Generally supermarkets are much larger than this, although it recognised that some supermarket retailers may have some stores this small. If a developer acquires land for a supermarket in Mosman's B2 Local Centre zones, it is a permissible use and would be approved subject to a Development Application. Council has a responsibility to assess these developments in accordance with planning controls and without bias. There is a strong appetite to preserve a very bespoke and granular character in Mosman. Limiting the size of retail stores to 500m2 would assist in balancing the impact of larger retail stores, however, this has only been done by one other Sydney council. This outcome can not be guaranteed, especially considering our changes to Mosman's LEP are subject to Department of Planning approval. M2 Bruce Planning Priority Number 4 (Sustainability) says to Open Space & This issue is beyond the tools available to a planner. A lot of Mosman's open space areas have (Not provide for recreational activity. How do we incorporate Plans of Management to assist with this. One of the constraints with the LSPS, LEP and DCPs is
88
Page 140 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Speaker Name/ Question / Comment Key Issue/s Response by Council (given at the public meeting) # Address stated) sustainability with the demand for and expansion of Sustainability they are blunt instruments that are unresponsive and take a long time to amend. One of the ways sporting/recreational facilities? planning does manage open space is through land use zones including the public recreation zone used for parks and ovals, and the environmental conservation zones for bushland. An action that Council will be working on is updating Plans of Management for crown reserves in Mosman. Council is mindful of its environmental stewardship responsibility and manages its recreational facilities in accordance with sound sustainability practices. Matters such as this are therefore managed by Council's Open Space Team. M3 Michael There are a number of plans of management that need Open Space & Modest funding has been provided to Council to update Plans of Management by the State Lynch to updated. When will these PoM's begin to updated? Sustainability Government. We are anticipating that a majority of the PoMs will be undertaken over the next 3 (Mosman) years. As there is a robust statutory process to consulting and introducing new PoMs we are anticipating around 3 per year will be completed over this period. M4 Not What can Council do to protect Mosman's historic Heritage If buildings are not protected by a heritage conservation area or heritage listed Council has limited Stated character and streetscapes from new developments that powers to stop the demolition of buildings. Although a property may be old and exhibit some replace historic but non-heritage protected buildings? heritage values, Council must be very selective in what properties are listed and already has an extensive inventory in the LEP. What can Council do to stop complying development Other Complying development and private certification is permitted under State policies administered by approved by private certifiers that has little regard for the Department of Planning. The current indication from the Department of Planning is that private Council's planning controls? certification will be retained, however, certifiers will be subject to stricter scrutiny. In Mosman there are good examples and bad examples of private certification, and it is unfortunate that the bad examples often overshadow the benefits of good private certification. M5 Alfredo Concerns over private certification resulting in buildings Other Council takes this matter seriously and has been expanding its compliance team to ensure that Bustos- that are unsafe or that are not aligned with Mosman's any complaints are comprehensively investigated. Ramirez character. Recommend the community writing a Recently we have seen more focus on private certification with issues such as combustible (Mosman) submission to State Government to demonstrate cladding and structural defects in the media. This may see a push for increased regulation of community opposition towards the matter. private certification by the State Government. M6 Brian The LSPS is a chance for Council to pushback on the Heritage [No response given at public meeting] Watters State Government. In terms of historic character and (Mosman) non-heritage historic buildings being removed, local character is being impacted. The aim for Mosman should be to protect these historic buildings even further to stop the widespread demolition of such buildings. With the tunnel planned for, Council should be Traffic & Council needs to be careful to not encourage rat-running if the new tunnel is built proactively demanding downscaling of the traffic density Transport of Military Rd by reducing the amount of lanes for cars, increasing bicycle and walking paths and generally improving the character of the road corridor. M7 Richard Concerns that the 300 new dwelling target for Mosman Housing [No response given at public meeting] Corbett is not enough. Mosman needs to provide more dwellings (Mosman) to ensure it is sharing the load of Sydney's growing population equally.When are we going to see population growth in Mosman? Sydney's population is growing too fast, what is Council's policy on population growth? Will Council
89
Page 141 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019 Council Meeting 3 December 2019 Attachment EP/52.1 Mosman Council
Attachment 1 – Feedback Received on draft Mosman Local Strategic Planning Statement
Speaker Name/ Question / Comment Key Issue/s Response by Council (given at the public meeting) # Address lobby the State and Federal Government for a desirable population growth outcome? We shouldn't be opposing the Medium Density Code as it provides good policy to diversify housing stock that meets the needs of the community. The creates street program in London provides a good example of an initiative that retains historic character, balanced with increase housing density. Make Mosman's facilities such as beaches, parks, Open Space & [No response given at public meeting] reserves, etc. more accessible to Greater Sydney. Sustainability M8 High More attention should be given to site specific issues Housing Council will be looking at the objectives for the zones, however, it is unlikely that any areas would Williams when determining zoning development potential of an be down zoned to a lower density. Our objectives will be complimented by robust assessment that (Mosman) area. For example, many R3 properties on Spit Rd are ensure site specific issues are adequately considered. serviced by small lanes which are not compatible with larger R3 style development.
90
Page 142 of 284 Document Set ID: 5781720 Version: 1, Version Date: 27/11/2019