DOCSLIB.ORG

Asylum Statistics Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Asylum Statistics Overview Key figures since 2018 M o Applicationsn by Y th ly RBE - W New Applications4 a pp As of 8 li 9 ear andc aMonth in 2021 ti 31 May on ester s si 2021 nc New 4Applications e 6 20 n Balkans - Asylum Sta 3 18 in 2020 3 1047 819 1142 1275 New Applications 1 15 370 2 9 K 1379 in 2019 2018 Janu… 862 2018 February Su 2018 March m 1018 New Applications1 - In May 2021,m 2,103 per 2018 April 0 a 703 total cumulative numberr (10,423) o 2018 May tistics - Summar K y same period. of 2018 June in 2018 K 685 ey 2018 July 796 T - Fur re 2018 August n 1003 2021, onlyther 6 % o sons in mixedd movements20 arrived18 Sept inem theber r 609 mor s 695 2018 October 1 e, 76 asylum applications wer Recognized - In May 814 Refugees in 20211 2018 November the beginning o 840 f the 7,230 per f new arrivals in 2021 is lower to2 the018 tr December 1701 the asylum pr, two positives fir y of k 135 2019 January 1690 641 840 7 2019 February - In May the authorities in the W 95 R 4 f the year 3 ey tr R ecognized8 ocedur sons who expr 2019 March efugees in 2020 number o st -instance decisions wer 2019 April e. , 63 applications wer e filed in May compar 1413 2019 May ends obser - A f inter egion, which is 19% lower than in the pr 105 t the end o essed intentions to seek asylum have lodged asylum claims. 2019 June 7 1364 views conducted in May 2021 is higher than in May 2020 (9 inter R 5 - In 2021, 22% (91) o 2019 July R ecognized1 ends obser efugees in 2019 separated childr f May 2021, 593 decisions wer 2019 August ester e r e taken (zer ed to 130 in April r ejected, and 1,512 asylum applications wer 2019 September v n Balkans r ved in 2020 (15,398) and 2019 (15,431)201 9for O cthetober ed 8 en (U f all applications have been submitted by women and 26% (108)o r by childr 2019 November 584 Recognized efugee status and two complementar R 5 egion conducted 26 inter 2019 December efugees in 2018 ASC). epr esenting decr evious month (2,610). The 2020 January e still pending which is half compar 2020 February 2020 March 17 ease o 2020 April 41 234 views out o f 41.5%. Since J 2020 May 175 e closed af A p 2020 June p 99 y for lic 2020 July 15 views).f which 58% wer a 4 ter the applicantsm o abscondedanuar tions 2020 August 209 f pr ed to the situation in 2020. 2020 September 163 otection). Since y sin Sy c 2020 October 180 e conducted in Serbia. The ria e 2 2020 November 0 113 Ira 1 M q 8 2020 December or b oc y 2021 January 47 co c 123 en, including 23 unaccompanied and P ount ak 2021 February is 130 A ta fg n r 2021 March ha y ni of 76 st 2021 April an or Al ge ig 2021 May ri i S a n ta 2. te 8K of Ira P n 2. al 1. 5K es 8K ti 5 ne .3K 1. 8K Lib ya 1.3K Tu rk 1. 8. ey 1K 4K Y 0. em 7K e n 0.4K E gy 0. pt 2K T un B i 0. a sia 2K ng la Kosovo*: Designations o de 0. sh 1K (1999). Data sour 0. concer 1K ning this factsheet please contact: Gabriel MA gover ce: SEE Regionalf K Asylum Statistics and UNHCR data available at https://popstats.unhcr osovo* ar nmental institutions. Retr e without pr ejudice to positions on status, and ar oactive changes in data may occur THIEU, mathieu@unhcr e in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 . .or g In most cases, data for this factsheet is pr .or g. For fur ther infor mation or any questions ovided by countr y level / RBE - Western Balkans - Asylum Statistics - 2021 Trends Analysis As of 31 May 2021 New Applications Regional Trends 2021 Total New Asylum Applications by Country of Asylum Total Asylum Intentions by Country of Asylum Total New Asylum Applications by Month Total New Asylum Intentions by Month Key figures 130 2335 Kosovo* 156 123 Bosnia and Herzegovina 5497 113 Montenegro 139 1771 1547 Montenegro 1250 489 Serbia 75 76 New Bosnia and Herzegovina 54 Serbia 439 47 759 855 Applications Albania 40 Kosovo* 41 of which: North Macedonia 25 January February March April May January February March April May 23 New Asylum Applications by Month and Country of Asylum Unaccompanied Albania 50 54 or separated 46 Bosnia and Herzegovina children* Kosovo* 29 21 34 34 Montenegro 16 16 16 19 16 14 14 16 North Macedonia 11 Serbia Recognized January February March April May Refugees New Asylum Intentions by Month and Country of Asylum Bosnia and Herzegovina Kosovo* Montenegro 22 1835 1221 Serbia Subsidiary 1172 Protection 580 689 444 380 57 January February March April May Rejected First Instance Decisions Trends Total Decisions by Country of Asylum First instance Decisions by Type and Country Total Otherwise Closed Applications by Country 21 19 Kosovo* 26 234 14 161 Serbia 25 8 555 6 6 3 3 4 3 97 Closed cases Bosnia and Herzegovina 22 1 2 North Macedonia 8 40 21 2 Montenegro 7 Kosovo* Serbia Bosnia and North Montenegro Albania *disaggregated figures Herzegovina Macedonia Albania 2 Kosovo* Monteneg… Bosnia and Serbia North Albania by age/gender are not Type of decision Refugee Rejected Subsidiary Protection Herzegovi… Macedonia always available Kosovo*: Designations of Kosovo* are without prejudice to positions on status, and are in line with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999). Data source: SEE Regional Asylum Statistics and UNHCR data available at https://popstats.unhcr.org. For further information or any questions concerning this factsheet please contact: Gabriel Mathieu, [email protected] In most cases, data for this factsheet is provided by country level governmental institutions. Retroactive changes in data may occur. / RBE - Western Balkans - Asylum Statistics - Monthly Analysis As of 31 May 2021 Monthly New Applications May 2021 Monthly New Asylum Applications by Country of Asylum Monthly New Asylum Applications by Country of Origin (Top 10) Monthly Otherwise Closed Applications by Nationality (Top 10) Key figures* Kosovo* 29 Algeria 9 Iraq 14 Serbia 19 Morocco 8 Morocco 14 Montenegro 16 Pakistan 8 76 Albania 4 Afghanistan 13 New Applications Bosnia and Herzegovina 4 Burundi 7 Iran 10 North Macedonia 4 Syria 7 Cameroon 8 Turkey 7 Monthly New Intentions to Seek Asylum by Reporting Country Pakistan 8 Bangladesh 6 Syria 8 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1835 Congo, Republic of 4 Iraq Algeria 6 Montenegro 380 4 2 Iran 3 Libya 6 Women Serbia 112 Libya 3 Palestine 6 Monthly First Instance Decisions Monthly Decisions by Type of Decision Monthly Interviews by Country of Asylum Average Lenght of Procedure (days) by Country Reporting Country Avg Duration (Days) Otherwise closed 111 between application and decision 15 Bosnia and Herzegovina 452 3 3 3 4 Rejected 8 2 0 Children ia na ro a o* ia rb i g oni an Se ov ne d ov lb including: Subsidiary Protection 2 eg e ce Kos A rz ont a He M M d th an or a N ni os Monthly Type of Decisions by Nationality B Type of decision Rejected Subsidiary Protection 4 Monthly Decisions by Country of Asylum and Type of Decision Total Pending Asylum Applications by Country of Asylum Unaccompanied 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 200 or separated Albania Type of decision N/A Rejected Subsidiary Protection child(ren) Montenegro 167 1 Burundi Serbia 100 1 Serbia 3 Kosovo* 91 1 2 Kosovo* 593 North Macedonia 35 Kosovo* 2 Pending opened 1 Albania 0 Morocco asylum North Macedonia 2 Albania has not provided any pending cases information for August applications 2 Pakistan *disaggregated figures Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 Kosovo*: Designations of Kosovo* are without prejudice to positions on status, and are in line with the United Nations Security Council 1 Somalia Resolution 1244 (1999). by age/gender are not 1 0 Data source: SEE Regional Asylum Statistics and UNHCR data available at https://popstats.unhcr.org. For further information or any always available Albania 1 Turkey questions concerning this factsheet please contact: Gabriel MATHIEU, [email protected] In most cases, data for this factsheet is provided by country level governmental institutions. Retroactive changes in data may occur. /.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia
    Elections in the Western Balkans: Fragile Progress in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia Graduate Policy Workshop January 2017 Authors Edward Atkinson, Nicholas Collins, Aparna Krishnamurthy, Mae Lindsey, Yanchuan Liu, David Logan, Ken Sofer, Aditya Sriraman, Francisco Varela Sandoval Advisor Jeff Fischer CONTENTS About the WWS Graduate Policy Workshop ........................................................................................iv Acknowledgements ..............................................................................................................................iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Albania ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Background and Context .................................................................................................................. 2 Description of Electoral and Political Processes and Institutions ................................................... 3 Electoral and Political Issues ............................................................................................................ 4 Electoral Process Vulnerabilities .......................................................................................................................... 4 Political Process Vulnerabilities ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Development Cooperation in Bosnia and Herzegovina Icons Icons 48
    CZECH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA ICONS ICONS 48 17 ICONS: COLOUR VERSION ICONS 48 ICONS NO ZERO GOOD HEALTH QUALITY GENDER CLEAN WATER POVERTY HUNGER AND WELL-BEING EDUCATION EQUALITY AND SANITATION CZECH DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 17 ICONS: COLOUR VERSION NO ZEROAFFORDABLE AND GOODDECENT HEALTH WORK AND QUALITYINDUSTRY, INNOVATION GENDERREDUCED CLEANSUSTAINABLE WATER CITIES RESPONSIBLE POVERTY HUNGERCLEAN ENERGY ANDECONOMIC WELL-BEING GROWTH EDUCATIONAND INFRASTRUCTURE EQUALITYINEQUALITIES ANDAND SANITATION COMMUNITIES CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION Bosnia and Herzegovina is one of the Czech Republic’s Thematic priorities and SDGs: Sustainable development goals most important development cooperation partners. AFFORDABLE AND DECENTCLIMATE WORK AND INDUSTRY,LIFE INNOVATION REDUCEDLIFE SUSTAINABLEPEACE, JUSTICE CITIES RESPONSIBLEPARTNERSHIPS Over the past 20 years, the nature of cooperation has CLEAN ENERGY ECONOMICACTION GROWTH AND INFRASTRUCTUREBELOW WATER INEQUALITIESON LAND ANDAND COMMUNITIES STRONG CONSUMPTIONFOR THE GOALS evolved from humanitarian assistance from the Czech INSTITUTIONS AND PRODUCTION Republic through post-war reconstruction to the current scheme to support the stability and successful ICONS 48 ICONS 48 integrationICONS of Bosnia and Herzegovina into the CLIMATE LIFE LIFE PEACE, JUSTICE PARTNERSHIPS EconomicACTION When an icongrowth is onBELOW a square, WATER thatwith square mustONemphasis LAND be proportional 1 x 1. ANDon STRONG energyFOR THEfrom GOALS ICONS INSTITUTIONS European
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence
    Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attitudes on Violent Extremism and Foreign Influence January 4 - February 3, 2017 Detailed Methodology • The survey was conducted by Ipsos in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights and Survey Research, and was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy. • Data was collected between January 4 and February 3, 2017 through face-to-face interviews at the respondents’ homes using the CAPI method (computer assisted personal interviewing). • A total of 1,537 interviews were completed, with an overall margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percent at the midrange of the 95 percent confidence level. A nationally-representative sample was assembled based on a multistage stratification proportionate to population sample distribution, through the random selection of households and respondents. • The sample is composed of citizens of BiH, aged 18 and older and was based on the 2013 Census; Vital Statistics 2012 and Ipsos estimations derived from the Central Election Commission database; Agency for Identification Documents; and the Registers and Data Exchange of Bosnia and Herzegovina database. • The sampling frame consisted of polling station territories (approximate size of census units) within strata defined by municipalities and type of settlements (urban and rural). Polling station territories enable the most reliable sample selection, due to the fact that these units represent the most comprehensive and up-to-date data available. • Households were selected according to the random route technique. Starting from a given address, interviewers selected the third house down the same side of the street or the next available house for an interview from the starting point.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of North Macedonia
    182 The Republic of North Macedonia A. Progress in the implementation of the minimum standard The Republic of North Macedonia has 47 tax agreements in force, as reported in its response to the Peer Review questionnaire. None of the Republic of North Macedonia’s agreements comply with the minimum standard or are subject to a complying instrument. B. Implementation issues No jurisdiction has raised any concerns about the Republic of North Macedonia. The Republic of North Macedonia is encouraged to implement the minimum standard in its agreements. Summary of the jurisdiction response – The Republic of North Macedonia Treaty partners Compliance with If compliant, the Signature of a The alternative Comments the standard alternative complying implemented implemented instrument through the complying instrument (if not the MLI) 1 Albania* No N/A No N/A 2 Austria No N/A No N/A 3 Azerbaijan* No N/A No N/A 4 Belarus* No N/A No N/A 5 Belgium No N/A No N/A partial compliance with respect to PPT 6 Bosnia and No N/A No N/A Herzegovina* 7 Bulgaria No N/A No N/A 8 China (People’s No N/A No N/A Republic of) 9 Chinese Taipei* No N/A No N/A 10 Croatia No N/A No N/A 11 Czech Republic No N/A No N/A 12 Denmark No N/A No N/A 13 Estonia No N/A No N/A 14 Finland No N/A No N/A 15 France No N/A No N/A 16 Germany No N/A No N/A 17 Hungary No N/A No N/A 18 India No N/A No N/A partial compliance with respect to PPT PREVENTION OF TREATY ABUSE – SECOND PEER REVIEW REPORT ON TREATY SHOPPING © OECD 2021 183 19 Iran* No N/A No N/A 20 Ireland No N/A No N/A 21 Italy No N/A
    [Show full text]
  • Never Again: International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina1
    Never again: 1 International intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina July 2017 David Harland2 1 This study is one of a series commissioned as part of an ongoing UK Government Stabilisation Unit project relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project is exploring how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. This is a 'working paper' and the views contained within do not necessarily represent those of HMG. 2 Dr David Harland is Executive Director of the Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. He served as a witness for the Prosecution at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in the cases of The Prosecutor versus Slobodan Milošević, The Prosecutor versus Radovan Karadžić, The Prosecutor versus Ratko Mladić, and others. Executive summary The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina was the most violent of the conflicts which accompanied the break- up of Yugoslavia, and this paper explores international engagement with that war, including the process that led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement. Sarajevo and Srebrenica remain iconic symbols of international failure to prevent and end violent conflict, even in a small country in Europe. They are seen as monuments to the "humiliation" of Europe and the UN and the
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Social Protection System Through the Introduction of a New Child Benefits System and Integrated Case Management Approach
    Realising Children’s Rights through Social Policy in Europe and Central Asia Action Area 1 A Compendium of UNICEF’s Contributions (2014-2020) 40 NORTH MACEDONIA // Reforming the Social Protection System through the Introduction of a new Child Benefits System and Integrated Case Management Approach © UNICEF/UNI200268/Nybo Realising Children’s Rights through Social Policy in Europe and Central Asia 41 A Compendium of UNICEF’s Contributions (2014-2020) North Macedonia Issue North Macedonia has recently made moderate gains in other social care services, which generated duplications in economic growth development. However, this progress coverage and money, and wasted time. Widespread lack has not been evenly distributed. The at-risk-of-poverty of (disaggregated) data and analysis of the impact of social rate and the combined risk of poverty or social exclusion protection on children made implementation and impact rate among children are very high: 28.6% and 46.1% monitoring difficult. respectively.86 A 2018 Gini coefficient of 31.987 implies high inequality in wealth distribution. Moreover, it is the only North Macedonia has a long history of providing social Western Balkan country that has shown a growth in infant services for families. The two main providers are the mortality between 2013 and 2017. It also experiences high Centres for Social Work (CSWs) and the Employment rates of family violence, low pre-school enrolment, and Service Agencies (ESAs). The 30 CSWs are the country’s poor primary and secondary school outcomes.88 Those key main social protection hubs, administering all cash benefits aspects of the social protection system capable of reducing and delivering social support and care services, including these challenges – the cash benefit and social care system – psycho-social support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of External Actors in the Western Balkans
    The influence of external actors in the Western Balkans A map of geopolitical players www.kas.de Impressum Contact: Florian C. Feyerabend Desk Officer for Southeast Europe/Western Balkans European and International Cooperation Europe/North America team Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Phone: +49 30 26996-3539 E-mail: [email protected] Published by: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e. V. 2018, Sankt Augustin/Berlin Maps: kartoxjm, fotolia Design: yellow too, Pasiek Horntrich GbR Typesetting: Janine Höhle, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. Diese Publikation ist/DThe text of this publication is published under a Creative Commons license: “Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 international” (CC BY-SA 4.0), https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-sa/4.0/legalcode. ISBN 978-3-95721-471-3 Contents Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans 4 Albania 9 Bosnia and Herzegovina 14 Kosovo 17 Croatia 21 Macedonia 25 Romania 29 Serbia and Montenegro 32 The geopolitical context 39 3 Introduction: The role of external actors in the Western Balkans by Dr Lars Hänsel and Florian C. Feyerabend Dear readers, A spectre haunts the Western Balkans – the spec- consists of reports from our representatives in the tre of geopolitics. Once again, the region is at risk various countries involved. Along with the non-EU of becoming a geostrategic chessboard for exter- countries in the Western Balkans, this study also nal actors. Warnings are increasingly being voiced considers the situation in Croatia and Romania. in Brussels and other Western capitals, as well as in the region itself. Russia, China, Turkey and the One thing is clear: the integration of the Western Gulf States are ramping up their political, eco- Balkans into Euro-Atlantic and European struc- nomic and cultural influence in this enclave within tures is already well advanced, with close ties and the European Union – with a variety of resources, interdependencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Challenges of Human Capital in Former Yugoslavia Region
    KEY CHALLENGES OF HUMAN CAPITAL IN FORMER YUGOSLAVIA REGION VALERIJA BOTRIĆ THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS, ZAGREB KEY CHALLANGES Demographic changes – aging population In case of some countries/periods even population decline (supported by net migration flows) Educational system – over-education, skills mismatch, low participation in adult education Low productivity: underutilization of labour, low capital intensity Some similarities to the rest of the Europe Some similarities to European South PRE-PANDEMIC HOT TOPICS: MIGRATION AND RESTRUCTURING Strong net emigration (?) Lingering economic structures Finding better work and life opporunities (labour High unemployment market mechanisms work!) High (official) inactivity rates Labour market skills mismatch (slow reforming High informal sector educational system) Skills shortages in certain sectors Labour market institutions Inability to attract talent Voting with their feet Opposition to active immigration policies Lack of precise (structural!) data The difference in characteristics between those who leave and those who stay HUMAN CAPITAL – STILL A COMPARATIVE ADANTAGE? Average annual change, 2006-2019 Work population (15-64) share 71 70 69 68 15 67 10 66 5 65 64 0 63 -5 62 -10 61 -15 -20 -25 total population natural change net migration 2006 2020 Source: Eurostat. EMPLOYMENT TO POPULATIN RATIO 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia North Macedonia Montenegro Serbia Slovenia Source: PennWorldTables10.0 THE CONSEQUENCES OF MIGRATIONS Migration stock dynamics Human flight and brain drain 1 800 000 8 1 600 000 7 1 400 000 6 1 200 000 1 000 000 5 800 000 4 600 000 3 400 000 2 200 000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 .
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Software Development and Creative Services Sector
    Municipality of Novi Grad Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina ICT Software Development and Creative Services Sector Key Highlights As the world market for ICT evolves, Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) continues to take advantage of software development, engineering, and creative services opportunities. B&H provides a highly talented Why Invest? workforce at reasonable cost, serving as an attractive alternative to Highly talented, already established ICT services markets. creative and skilled labor As the site for the internationally-renowned Sarajevo Film Festival – Competitive labor costs B&H and Sarajevo in particular provide a networking platform generated by the presence of international film and animated features Westernized work ethics expertise. Municipal support with Several prominent software development companies nested their training programs that will premises in the municipality of Novi Grad Sarajevo - Authority generate new jobs Partners, AtlantBH, Klika, Mistral Technologies, Simplify, Rubicon, Extensive history of film HUB387, Academy387, NEST71 the first ICT park in BiH. These and animated features, companies are delivering customized software solutions to reputable showcased by numerous international clients across the globe. The BIT Alliance and HUB 387 awards Academy are providing a mechanism for ensuring highly qualified on- demand workforce in the sector – depending on company/project Place of internationally needs. renowned film festival – enabling networking Although volume of labor is relatively small (having in mind the size of platform the country), this is offset by the talent and creativity. The skill set ranges from ICT sector-wide competencies to specific expertise in Positioned at doorsteps the software development and creative services verticals. The B&H of EU with compatible time workforce prides itself in being composed of ‘out-of-the-box’ zones thinkers, who are able to develop and implement Intellectual Mechanisms to scale up Properties (IP) from conception to market penetration.
    [Show full text]
  • WESTERN BALKANS REGULAR ECONOMIC REPORT No.19 | Spring 2021
    WESTERN BALKANS REGULAR ECONOMIC REPORT No.19 | Spring 2021 Public Disclosure Authorized Subdued Recovery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Western Balkans Regular Economic Report No.19 Subdued Recovery Spring 2021 Acknowledgements This Regular Economic Report (RER) covers economic developments, prospects, and economic policies in the Western Balkans’ region: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia. The report is produced twice a year by a team led by Edith Kikoni and Enrique Blanco Armas (Task Team Leaders). This issue’s core team included World Bank staff working on the Western Balkan countries (with additional contributions to specific sections): Christoph Ungerer, Nicolo Dalvit (Growth section), Sanja Madžarević-Šujster, Filip Jolevski (Labor section), Trang Nguyen, Ana Maria Oviedo, Leonardo Lucchetti (Poverty section), Milan Lakićević, Besart Myderrizi (Fiscal section), Hilda Shijaku (Monetary section), Johanna Jaeger (Financial sector section), Sandra Hlivnjak (External section), Lazar Šestović (Outlook section) and Tania Ghossein, Sylvia Solf and Ahmed Nauraiz Rana (Spotlight). Additional contributions were made by: Stefanie Koettl- Brodmann (Spotlight); Collette Wheeler (Outlook Section); Carlos Gustavo Ospino Hernandez (Poverty section); Alena Kantarovich, Alper Oguz, Gunhild Berg, Keler Gjika and Qianye Zhang (Financial sector section) and Marc Schiffbauer and Asli Senkal. Research assistance was provided by Suzana Jukić. Anne Grant provided assistance in editing, and Budy Wirasmo assistance in designing. The cover image was created by Sanja Tanić. The dissemination of the report and external and media relations are managed by an External Communications team comprised of John Mackedon, Artem Kolesnikov, Paul A. Clare, Lundrim Aliu, Anita Božinovska, Ana Gjokutaj, Jasmina Hadžić, Gordana Filipovic, Mirjana Popović, Sanja Tanić and Carl P.
    [Show full text]