DOCSLIB.ORG

SNH Commissioned Report 925: a Review of the Influence Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SNH Commissioned Report 925: a Review of the Influence Of Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 925 A review of the influence of ombrotrophic peat depth on the successful restoration of bog habitat COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 925 A review of the influence of ombrotrophic peat depth on the successful restoration of bog habitat For further information on this report please contact: Malcolm Fraser Scottish Natural Heritage Silvan House 3rd Floor East 231 Corstorphine Road EDINBURGH EH12 7AT Telephone: 0131 3162629 E-mail: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Lindsay, R.A. & Clough, J. 2016. A review of the influence of ombrotrophic peat depth on the successful restoration of bog habitat. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 925. This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage Year 2016. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary A review of the influence of ombrotrophic peat depth on the successful restoration of bog habitat Commissioned Report No. 925 Project No: 15222 Contractor: Richard Lindsay and Jack Clough, University of East London Year of publication: 2016 Keywords Peat; depth; extraction; consent; minimum; residual; bog; ombrotrophic; restoration. Background A number of raised bogs in Scotland currently have planning consent for commercial peat extraction. All of these consents are now subject to periodic review through the Renewal of Mineral Permissions (“ROMP”) process. Whereas in earlier times such consents imposed relatively few conditions in relation to after-use, expectations are now increasingly focused on restoration of the original raised bog habitat and conditions are thus being imposed accordingly, both on consents subject to ROMP and also on any new consents which may be granted. Bog peat is formed when the living, peat-forming surface is no longer able to draw on the underlying mineral sub-soil, or on the mineral-enriched groundwater table, and is thus wholly dependent upon direct precipitation inputs for its supply of water and solutes – in technical terms it becomes ‘ombrotrophic’. If a peatland site is to be restored to ombrotrophic bog following commercial peat extraction, a residual layer of peat must remain in order to form a barrier between the mineral-enriched conditions of the sub-soil with its associated water table, and the peat-forming vegetation newly-established on the bare peat surface after extraction ceases. In some cases the condition imposed in relation to this residual peat layer has been to require retention of ‘an average minimum peat depth of 0.5 m’. Both the origins and likely efficacy of this condition do not appear to have been subject to scrutiny at any point. This report seeks to assess the concept of ‘an average minimum peat depth of 0.5 m’ as a requirement for restoration of ombrotrophic bog vegetation on commercially cut- over bog systems, based on available published material. Main findings There appears to be no published scientific literature, nor any official guidance, which recommends use of an ‘average minimum residual peat depth of 0.5 m’ for restoration of bog habitat; Typically, lowland raised bogs tend to have basal layers of fen peat which are, on average, a little under 2 m deep and thus if the residual peat thickness is less than 2 m there is a strong possibility that any restoration efforts will necessarily begin on a mineral- enriched fen-peat layer; i The vast majority of literature concerned with residual peat depths for peatland (not necessarily bog) restoration has in the past emphasised the need for a minimum residual peat thickness of 0.5 m provided the peat is strongly humified (at least H7 on the von Post scale); There has also been consensus in the past that neither the extraction process itself, nor the drainage system, should cut into the mineral sub-soil; If the peat is not so strongly humified, it has been recommended in the past that the residual peat layer should be at least 1 m deep; Evidence from sub-peat layers of raised bogs in the UK indicates that many sites have somewhat variable sub-peat deposits and thus it is not reasonable to proceed on the basis that a peat bog is underlain by impermeable deposits unless a detailed survey of sub-peat deposits has been undertaken; Strongly humified peat shrinks and cracks more readily than less humified peat and thus even where a minimum layer of 0.5 m of strongly humified has been recommended in the past, it has also been recommended that this peat layer should be covered with at least a 20-30 cm layer of ‘top-spit’ material to minimise the possibility of drying out and cracking; Shrinkage due to drying during the last stages of peat extraction and prior to the water table being raised across the site as part of the restoration programme will mean that a residual peat depth of 0.5 m at cessation of extraction will be less than this by the time the restoration programme is established; Although a great many restoration schemes have been undertaken in the UK, Northern Germany and Canada, none of these has yet established an ombrotrophic bog vegetation, the dominant vegetation generally being a ‘poor-fen’ type which is a pre- cursor for establishment of bog vegetation; All these restoration programmes have been undertaken on areas where the residual peat thickness has generally been somewhat less than 2 m deep and thus are likely to be influenced to greater or lesser degrees by proximity to, or establishment in, fen peat deposits, enhanced still further by any water which irrigates the surface vegetation having been in contact with the mineral sub-soil through cracks in the peat; Under natural conditions, such poor-fen vegetation can persist for 200-300 years, suggesting that the restoration programmes which are currently dominated by poor-fen vegetation may remain in this state for a considerable period into the future; A major review of spontaneous re-vegetation recovery on milled peat sites in Estonia indicates that a minimum residual peat thickness of 2.3 m is required if ombrotrophic bog vegetation is to establish successfully without a poor-fen phase; Experimental work based on the Estonian recommendation of 2.3 m for the residual peat depth indicates that on a former milled site with a residual peat depth of 2.5 m it is possible to re-establish ombrotrophic bog habitat directly. For further information on this project contact: Malcolm Fraser, Scottish Natural Heritage, Silvan House, 3rd Floor East, 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh, EH12 7AT. Tel: 0131 3162629 or [email protected] For further information on the SNH Research and Technical Support Programme contact: Knowledge and Information Unit, Scottish Natural Heritage, Great Glen House, Inverness, IV3 8NW. Tel: 01463 725000 or [email protected] ii Table of Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.1.1 Planning context 1 1.1.2 The ecological basis of a ‘minimum peat depth’ 2 1.2 Scope of the Review 6 1.3 Objective of the Review 7 1.3.1 Primary question 7 1.3.2 Sub-questions 7 1.3.3 Key definitions 7 2. METHODS 8 2.1 General principles 8 2.2 Evidence search 8 2.2.1 Search strategy 8 2.2.2 Search terms used 8 2.2.3 Databases and search engines used 9 2.2.4 Study inclusion/exclusion criteria 9 2.2.5 Selection of references for assessment 10 2.3 Critical appraisal 10 2.3.1 Categorisation of publications 10 2.3.2 Evaluation of publications 10 2.3.3 Synthesis of publications 11 2.4 Integration of results 11 3. RESULTS 12 3.1 Scope of the evidence 12 3.2 Results of the searches and selection of publications for detailed review 13 3.3 Sub-Question 1: What is the typical thickness of the fen-peat layer in a lowland raised bog? 14 3.3.1 Background 14 3.3.2 Categorisation and assessment 14 3.3.3 Synthesis 14 3.4 Sub-Question 2: Does residual peat depth influence surface-water chemistry and bog restoration? 16 3.4.1 Background 16 3.4.2 Categorisation and assessment 18 3.4.3 Synthesis 20 3.5 Sub-Question 3: Does residual peat depth influence the hydrology of bog restoration? 23 3.5.1 Background 23 3.5.2 Categorisation and assessment 26 3.5.3 Synthesis 35 3.6 Sub-Question 4: Does residual peat depth influence the vegetation achieved during bog restoration? 38 3.6.1 Background 38 3.6.2 Categorisation and assessment 39 3.6.3 Synthesis 46 3.7 Sub-Question 5: What is the timescale of transition from poor-fen conditions to ombrotrophic bog in natural or managed peatland succession? 47 3.7.1 Background 47 3.7.2 Categorisation and assessment 47 3.7.3 Synthesis 49 iii 3.8 Sub-Question 6: What are the potential effects on a bog restoration programme of using a residual peat depth having an average minimum depth of 0.5 m? 50 3.8.1 Background 50 3.8.2 Categorisation and assessment 50 3.8.3 Synthesis 53 4. DISCUSSION 54 4.1 The source of the ‘average minimum depth of 0.5 m of peat’ 54 4.1.1 Early guidance about residual peat depth 54 4.1.2 Later UK guidance about residual peat depth 54 4.1.3 Recent international recommendations 55 4.2 Justification for the ‘average minimum depth of 0.5 m of peat’ 56 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Riparian Vegetation Management
    Engineering in the Water Environment Good Practice Guide Riparian Vegetation Management Second edition, June 2009 Your comments SEPA is committed to ensuring its Good Practice Guides are useful and relevant to those carrying out activities in Scotland’s water environment. We welcome your comments on this Good Practice Guide so that we can improve future editions. A feedback form and details on how to send your comments to us can be found at the back of this guide in Appendix 1. Acknowledgements This document was produced in association with Northern Ecological Services (NES). Page 1 of 47 Engineering in the Water Environment Good Practice Guide: Riparian Vegetation Management Second edition, June 2009 (Document reference: WAT-SG-44) Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 What’s included in this Guide? 3 2 Importance of riparian vegetation 6 3 Establishing/creating vegetation 8 3.1 Soft or green engineering techniques 8 3.2 Seeding and planting of bare soil 10 3.3 Creating buffer strips 11 3.4 Planting trees and shrubs 15 3.5 Marginal vegetation 18 3.6 Urban watercourses 21 4 Managing vegetation 24 4.1 Management of grasses and herbs 24 4.2 Management of heath and bog 27 4.3 Management of adjacent wetlands 28 4.4 Management of non-native plant species 29 4.5 Management of scrub and hedgerows 31 4.6 Management of individual trees 31 4.7 Management of trees – riparian woodland 33 4.8 Management of trees – conifer plantations 35 4.9 Large woody debris 37 4.10 Marginal vegetation 37 4.11 Urban watercourses 40 4.12 Use of herbicides 40 4.13 Environmental management of vegetation 41 4.14 Vegetation management plans 41 5 Sources of further information 42 5.1 Publications 42 5.2 Websites 44 Appendix 1: Feedback form – Good Practice Guide WAT-SG-44 45 Page 2 of 47 1 Introduction This document is one of a series of good practice guides produced by SEPA to help people involved in the selection of sustainable engineering solutions that minimise harm to the water environment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unique Raised Bog at Urbana, Ohio.*
    A UNIQUE RAISED BOG AT URBANA, OHIO.* ROBERT B. GORDON, Ohio State University. Located just north of the Champaign County Fair Grounds at Urbana, Ohio, is a unique dome-shaped bog, covered with shrubby vegetation for the most part, in which the center is raised at least ten feet above the margins. An old road crosses the bog. I have been told that it was once the main thorofare from Urbana to Columbus. Horses and wagons passed over it, I suppose, the drivers never realizing that a mat of fibrous roots less than one foot thick was all that held them over a body of water twelve feet in depth. Raised bogs, called "high moors" and "Hochmoore" in foreign literature, have long been known throughout Europe. N. S. Shaler is credited by Nichols with being the first to call attention to these peculiar swamps in North America, in 1888-89. Those which Shaler observed were "mostly limited to the eastern portion of Maine, near the shores of the Bay of Fundy," but some of lesser magnitude were reported for New Hampshire, northern Michigan, and Minnesota. Similar bogs, with centers about 13 feet above their margins, have been reported in the province of New Brunswick by Ganong (1897). Nichols (1919) described bogs of this type encountered in Maine, in which the elevation of the center above the margin varied from 2 or 3 feet to as high as 18 feet (e. g., Denbo Heath, covering several square miles in area). He asserts: "(1) that in the state of Maine raised bogs, in so far as they constitute a distinctive swamp type, are virtually restricted to the proximity of the seacoast; and (2) that in other portions of New England and of the eastern United States this type of bog is practically absent, although in occasional swamps it is possible to detect a slight elevation of the surface above the level of permanent ground water." Warming (1909) has summarized concisely the characteristic features of "Hochmoore." They owe their development to the growth of sphagnum mosses which absorb water that falls in the form of rain or snow.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Co and Ch Fluxes of Pristine Boreal Mires As a Background For
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH 12: 101–113 ISSN 1239-6095 Helsinki 11 May 2007 © 2007 Annual CO2 and CH4 fluxes of pristine boreal mires as a background for the lifecycle analyses of peat energy Sanna Saarnio1)*, Micaela Morero1), Narasinha J. Shurpali2), Eeva-Stiina Tuittila3), Markku Mäkilä4) and Jukka Alm5) 1) Faculty of Biosciences, University of Joensuu, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland (*corresponding author’s e-mail [email protected]) 2) Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Kuopio, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland 3) Department of Forest Ecology, P.O. Box 27, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 4) Geological Survey of Finland, P.O. Box 96, FI-02151 Espoo, Finland 5) Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu Research Unit, P.O. Box 68, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland Received 18 Nov. 2005, accepted 24 Jan. 2007 (Editor in charge of this article: Raija Laiho) Saarnio, S., Morero, M., Shurpali, N. J., Tuittila, E.-S., Mäkilä, M. & Alm, J. 2007: Annual CO2 and CH4 fluxes of pristine boreal mires as a background for the lifecycle analyses of peat energy. Boreal Env. Res. 12: 101–113. This study was conducted to improve the estimates of C gas fluxes in boreal ombrotrophic and minerotrophic mires used in the lifecycle analysis of peat energy. We reviewed lit- erature and collected field data from two new sites in southern Finland. In the literature, –2 –1 annual estimates of net CO2 exchange varied from –85 to +67 g C m a for ombrotrophic –2 –1 mires and from –101 to +98 g C m a for minerotrophic mires.
    [Show full text]
  • National Water Summary Wetland Resources: Maine
    National Water Summary-Wetland Resources 213 Maine Wetland Resources M aine is rich in wetland resources. About 5 million acres, or one­ System Wetland description fourth of the State, is wetland. Maine has a wide variety of wetlands, Palustrine .................. Nontidal and tidal-freshwater wetlands in which ranging from immense inland peatlands to salt marshes and mud vegetation is predominantly trees (forested wet­ flats along the coast. lands); shrubs (scrub-shrub wetlands); persistent Wetlands are an integral part of Maine's natural resources. or nonpersistent emergent, erect, rooted herba­ ceous plants (persistent- and nonpersistent­ Wetlands provide essential habitat for certain types of wildlife and emergent wetlands); or submersed and (or) vegetation, including rare and endangered species. They are used floating plants (aquatic beds). Also, intermit­ for timber and peat; hunting, fishing, and shellfishing; education tently to permanently flooded open-water bod­ and research; and bird, wildlife and plant observation, all of which ies of less than 20 acres in which water is less than 6.6 feet deep. boost tourism and the general economy. Wetlands also provide flood control, bank and shoreline-erosion control, sediment retention, lacustrine ................. Nontidal and tidal-freshwater wetlands within an intermittently to permanently flooded lake or water fi ltration, and nutrient uptake. In recognition of the impor­ reservoir larger than 20 acres and (or) deeper tance of wetlands, many government and private organizations have than 6.6 feet. Vegetation, when present, is pre­ worked to preserve wetlands and educate the public about wetland dominantly nonpersistent emergent plants (non­ values. For example, the Maine Department of Conservation owns persistent-emergent wetlands), or submersed and (or) floating plants (aquatic beds), or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetative Ecology of a Montane Mire, Crater Lake National
    AJ ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Susan Cornelia Seyer for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on December 14, 1979 Title: VEGETATIVE ECOLOGY OF A MONTANE MIRE, CRATER LAKE NATIONAL PARK, OREGON Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Jerry F. Franklin Mires, or peat-producing ecosystems, dominated by sedges, shrubs, and brown mosses, are common features in Cascade subalpine regions, occurring where moisture accumulates in small basins or on poorly-drained slopes. Although descriptions and classifications have been developed for mire vegetation in much of the world, there is little information of even a descriptive nature for these montane mires in Oregon and Washington. This thesis reports on phytosocia- logical structure, env'ironental relations, and successional trends in one such mire in the Oregon Cascade mountains. To characterize the general phytosociological structure of the mire vegetation at Sphagnum Bog, Crater Lake National Park, quantitative species cover data were used in conjunction with a Braun-Blanquet tabular analysis and two-dimensional stand ordinations, reciprocal averaging and a Bray-Curtis polar ordination. Defined community types correspond to physiognomic types as follows: Carex rostrata (reedswamp); Eleocharis pauciflora-Carex limosa, Eleocharis pauciflora/bryophytes (low sedge fens); Carex sichensis (tall sedge fen); Vaccinium/ Aulacomnium palustre, Vaccinium occidentala/Carex sitchensis (shrub thickets; Alnus incana/Brachythacium sp. and Salix barclayi (marginal carrs).Phases were defined when appropriate. A vegetation map was made to illustrate the locations and extent of the variouscommunities. Comparisons with other montane mires in thearea determined that the physiognomic units defined are repeatable when appropriate habitat conditions are present, and that they usually includemany of the same characteristic species, the dominant mosses being particularly constant.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Was Withdrawn on 6 November 2017
    2017. November 6 on understanding withdrawn was water for wildlife document This Water resources and conservation: the eco-hydrological requirements of habitats and species Assessing We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your 2017. environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are makingNovember your environment cleaner and healthier. 6 The Environment Agency. Out there, makingon your environment a better place. withdrawn was Published by: Environment Agency Rio House Waterside Drive, Aztec West Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD Tel: 0870document 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk This© Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. April 2007 Contents Brief summary 1. Introduction 2017. 2. Species and habitats 2.2.1 Coastal and halophytic habitats 2.2.2 Freshwater habitats 2.2.3 Temperate heath, scrub and grasslands 2.2.4 Raised bogs, fens, mires, alluvial forests and bog woodland November 2.3.1 Invertebrates 6 2.3.2 Fish and amphibians 2.3.3 Mammals on 2.3.4 Plants 2.3.5 Birds 3. Hydro-ecological domains and hydrological regimes 4 Assessment methods withdrawn 5. Case studies was 6. References 7. Glossary of abbreviations document This Environment Agency in partnership with Natural England and Countryside Council for Wales Understanding water for wildlife Contents Brief summary The Restoring Sustainable Abstraction (RSA) Programme was set up by the Environment Agency in 1999 to identify and catalogue2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Cors Fochno Walk MEWN ARGYFWNG O Warchodfa Natur Part of the Dyfi National Ffoniwch 999
    Gwarchodfa Natur Genedlaethol Dyfi National Nature Reserve Cors Fochno Croeso i Cors Fochno - rhan Welcome to Cors Fochno - Llwybrau Cerdded Cors Fochno Walk MEWN ARGYFWNG o Warchodfa Natur part of the Dyfi National Ffoniwch 999. PERYGLON Genedlaethol Dyfi (GNG) Nature Reserve Arhoswch ar y byrddau cerdded pren – Mae’r warchodfa fawr hon yn cwmpasu dros This large reserve covers an area of over 2,000 ha, peidiwch â suddo na mynd yn sownd! 2,000 hectar, ac mae’n cynnwys tair prif ardal a and is made up of three main areas and many FEL Y GALL PAWB EU MWYNHAU nifer o wahanol gynefinoedd ar gyfer bywyd dierent habitats for wildlife and plants. • Dim cŵn os gwelwch yn dda, i osgoi aflonyddu gwyllt a phlanhigion. ar fywyd gwyllt sensitif Cors Fochno (Borth Bog): one of the largest and finest • Dim gwersylla dros nos na defnyddio cerbydau Cors Fochno: un o’r enghreitiau mwyaf a gorau sydd ar remaining examples of a raised peat bog in Britain. gwersylla yn y Warchodfa ôl o gyforgors fawn ym Mhrydain. Ynyslas Dunes: the largest dunes in Ceredigion and Cofnodi’r dystiolaeth Taking down the evidence • Dim tanau Twyni Ynyslas: y twyni mwyaf yng Ngheredigion ac er ei although the smallest of the three areas of the Dyfi NNR, by Am dros 6,000 o flynyddoedd mae mawn wedi bod yn cronni yma’n Peat has been accumulating here gradually and continuously for over bod yr ardal leiaf yng Ngwarchodfa Natur Genedlaethol Dyfi, far the most visited. raddol ac mae nawr wedi cyrraedd dyfnder o dros 6m! Mae 6,000 years and now reaches a depth of over 6m! Remains of each dyma’r ardal sy’n derbyn y nifer mwyaf o ymwelwyr.
    [Show full text]
  • Rich Conifer Swamp Communityrich Conifer Abstract Swamp, Page 1
    Rich Conifer Swamp CommunityRich Conifer Abstract Swamp, Page 1 Community Range Photo by Michael R. Penskar Prevalent or likely prevalent Infrequent or likely infrequent Absent or likely absent Overview: Rich conifer swamp is a groundwater- communities are minerotrophic wetlands but differ in influenced, or minerotrophic, forested wetland that is species composition because of the absence of northern dominated by northern white cedar (Thuja occidentalis) white cedar, which often forms a dense canopy. An- and occurs on organic soils (e.g., peat and muck). The other type of conifer-dominated wetland, poor conifer community is often referred to as cedar swamp. swamp, which occurs primarily in northern Michigan, can be distinguished from rich conifer swamp by its Global and State Rank: G4/S3 acidic organic soils, lack of groundwater influence (i.e., ombrotrophic), and prevalence of black spruce (Picea Range: Rich conifer swamp occurs throughout the up- mariana) and/or tamarack (Kost et al. 2007). Stands of per Midwest and northeast United States and adjacent mixed conifers and hardwoods that occur on saturated Canadian provinces (Faber-Langendoen 2001, Nature- mineral or muck soils are classified as hardwood- Serve 2001). The community varies in overall species conifer swamp and also occur primarily in northern composition across its range, which includes Michigan, Michigan (Kost et al. 2007). Boreal forest, which is Minnesota, Wisconsin, Ontario, Manitoba, Quebec, often dominated by northern white cedar, is sometimes New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine, and confused with rich conifer swamp. Unlike rich conifer northern Illinois, Indiana and Ohio (Faber-Langendoen swamp, most boreal forests in Michigan are upland 2001, NatureServe 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Peat Chemistry Associated with Permafrost Thaw Increase Greenhouse Gas Production
    Changes in peat chemistry associated with permafrost thaw increase greenhouse gas production Suzanne B. Hodgkinsa,1, Malak M. Tfailya, Carmody K. McCalleyb, Tyler A. Loganc, Patrick M. Crilld, Scott R. Saleskab, Virginia I. Riche, and Jeffrey P. Chantona,1 aDepartment of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; bDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; cAbisko Scientific Research Station, Swedish Polar Research Secretariat, SE-981 07 Abisko, Sweden; dDepartment of Geological Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; and eDepartment of Soil, Water and Environmental Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 Edited by Nigel Roulet, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, and accepted by the Editorial Board March 7, 2014 (received for review August 1, 2013) 13 Carbon release due to permafrost thaw represents a potentially during CH4 production (10–12, 16, 17), δ CCH4 also depends on 13 major positive climate change feedback. The magnitude of carbon δ CCO2,soweusethemorerobustparameterαC (10) to repre- loss and the proportion lost as methane (CH4) vs. carbon dioxide sent the isotopic separation between CH4 and CO2.Despitethe ’ (CO2) depend on factors including temperature, mobilization of two production pathways stoichiometric equivalence (17), they previously frozen carbon, hydrology, and changes in organic mat- are governed by different environmental controls (18). Dis- ter chemistry associated with environmental responses to thaw. tinguishing these controls and further mapping them is therefore While the first three of these effects are relatively well under- essential for predicting future changes in CH4 formation under stood, the effect of organic matter chemistry remains largely un- changing environmental conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Burns Bog Ecological Conservancy Area Management Plan May 2007
    Burns Bog Ecological Conservancy Area Management Plan May 2007 BURNS BOG ECOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Public Acquisition and Management of Lands........................................... 1 1.2 Planning Process....................................................................................... 2 2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Formation of Burns Bog............................................................................. 3 2.2 Significance of Burns Bog ......................................................................... 4 2.3 Cultural History .......................................................................................... 4 2.4 Recent Bog History.................................................................................... 5 3.0 MANAGEMENT CONTEXT .................................................................................. 5 4.0 THE BOG LANDS AND THE GVRD .................................................................... 7 5.0 VISION AND OBJECTIVES.................................................................................. 7 5.1 Vision – 100 Year Timeframe .................................................................... 7 5.2 Mission ...................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Management
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure and Composition of Vegetation in the Lake-Fill Peatlands of Indiana
    2001. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 1 10:51-78 THE STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF VEGETATION IN THE LAKE-FILL PEATLANDS OF INDIANA Anthony L. Swinehart 1 and George R. Parker: Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Daniel E. Wujek: Department of Biology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48859 ABSTRACT. The vegetation of 16 lake-fill peatlands in northern Indiana was systematically sampled. Peatland types included fens, tall shrub bogs, leatherleaf bogs and forested peatlands. No significant difference in species richness among the four peatland types was identified from the systematic sampling. Vegetation composition and structure, along with water chemistry variables, was analyzed using multi- variate statistical analysis. Alkalinity and woody plant cover accounted for much of the variability in the herbaceous and ground layers of the peatlands, and a successional gradient separating the peatlands was evident. A multivariate statistical comparison of leatherleaf bogs from Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, New York, New Jersey and New Hampshire was made on the basis of vegetation composition and frequency and five climatic variables. The vascular vegetation communities of Indiana peatlands and other peatlands in the southern Great Lakes region are distinct from those in the northeastern U.S., Ohio and the northern Great Lakes. Some of these distinctions are attributed to climatic factors, while others are related to biogeo- graphic history of the respective regions. Keywords: Peatlands, leatherleaf bogs, fens, ecological succession, phytogeography Within midwestern North America, the such as Chamaedaphne calyculata, Androm- northern counties of Illinois, Indiana and Ohio eda glaucophylla, and Carex oligospermia of- 1 represent the southern extent of peatland com- ten make "southern outlier peatlands ' con- munities containing characteristic plant spe- spicuous to botanists, studies of such cies of northern or boreal affinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Soil Fertility Influence the Vegetation Diversity of a Tropical Peat Swamp
    Does soil fertility influence the vegetation diversity of a tropical peat swamp forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia? By Leanne Elizabeth Milner Dissertation presented for the Honours degree of BSc Geography Department of Geography University of Leicester 24 th February 2009 Approx number of words (12,000) 1 Contents Page LIST OF FIGURES I LIST OF TABLES II ABSTRACT III ACKNOWLEGEMENTS IV Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Aim 2 1.2 Objectives 2 1.3 Hypotheses 2 1.4 Scientific Background and Justification 3 1.5 Literature Review 7 1.5.1 Soil Fertility and Vegetation Species Diversity 7 1.5.2 Tropical Peatlands 7 1.5.3 Vegetation and Soil in tropical peatlands 8 1.5.4 Hydrology 14 1.5.5 Phenology and Rainfall 15 Chapter 2 : Methodology 17 2.1 Study Site and Transects 18 2.2 Soil Analysis 21 2.3 Chemical Analysis 22 2.4 Tree Data 25 2.5 Phenology Data 25 2.6 Rainfall Data 26 2.7 Data Analysis 26 2.7.1 Soil Data Analysis 26 2.7.2 Tree Data Analysis 26 2.7.3 Phenology Data Analysis 28 2 2.7.4 Rainfall Data Analysis 28 Chapter 3: Analysis 29 3.1 Tree and Liana Analysis 30 3.1.1 Basal Area and Density 31 3.1.2 Relative Importance Values 33 3.2 Peat Chemistry Analysis 35 3.3 Tree Phenology Analysis 43 3.4 Rainfall Analysis 46 Chapter 4: Discussion 47 4.1 Overall Findings 48 4.2 Peat Chemistry 48 4.3 Vegetation and Phenology 51 4.4 Peat Depth and Gradient 53 4.5 Significance of the Water Table 54 4.6 Limitations and Areas for further Research 56 Chapter 5: Conclusion 59 5.0 Conclusion 60 REFERENCES 62 APPENDICES 67 Appendix A: Soil Nutrient Analysis 68 Appendix B: Regression Outputs 70 Appendix C: Tree Data ON CD Appendix D: Phenology Data ON CD 3 List of Figures Figure 1 – Distribution of tropical peatlands in South East Asia and location of the study area.
    [Show full text]