The Early Origin of Vertebral Anomalies, As Illustrated by a 'Butterfly Vertebra'

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

J. Anat. (1986), 149, pp. 157-169 157 With 7 figures Printed in Great Britain The early origin of vertebral anomalies, as illustrated by a 'butterfly vertebra' F. MULLER, R. O'RAHILLY AND D. R. BENSON Carnegie Laboratories ofEmbryology, California Primate Research Centre and Departments ofHuman Anatomy, Neurology, and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A. (Accepted 30 January 1986) INTRODUCTION Histological reports of vertebral malformations in the human embryo and early fetus are extremely rare, e.g. sagittal clefts at 17-25 mm (Orts Llorca, Ruano Gil & Jimenez Collado, 1962) and at 21 mm (Feller & Stemnberg, 1930). The present example of a 'butterfly vertebra' in an otherwise normal, early human fetus pro- vided an opportunity to devise a developmental timetable for the appearance of this and similar congenital vertebral anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The anomaly, which had not been noted externally, was discovered in sections of the vertebral column in a fetus (listed as S6 in the Gardner-Gray-O'Rahilly Collection) of 63 mm in greatest length (and hence approximately 10 postovulatory weeks in age). The foot length was 11 mm and the weight was 25 g. As part of a project on vertebral development, the vertebral column had been isolated (Fig. 1), sectioned sagittally at 25 ,um and the sections stained by a modified Mallory azan technique. Graphic reconstructions of both the affected and the adjacent thoracic vertebrae were prepared from projection drawings of every second or every third section. Reconstructions similar to those of thoracic vertebrae 8 and 9 of the anomalous 63 mm fetus were made from horizontal sections of a normal 69 mm fetus (No. 4291 in the Carnegie Collection). In addition, sagittal sections of the vertebral column of another normal 69 mm fetus (S 34) were photographed and studied. In the account that follows cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebrae will be abbreviated to CV, TV and LV, respectively. RESULTS Normal controls Reconstructions of normal thoracic vertebrae (TV8 and 9) of the affected fetus (S6) show that the centra are equal in height both ventrally and dorsally (Fig. 2A, B). The remains of the notochord are slightly anterior to the middle of the centra and are expanded in the region of the future nucleus pulposus (Fig. 2A). Laterally, segmental arteries are seen to be symmetrical and present at each vertebral level (Fig. 2B). The reconstruction of a control fetus (No. 4291) reveals the spinal nerve roots and ganglia as well as the normal vertebral anatomy. The cartilaginous neural processes have fused dorsally, so that the neural (future vertebral) arch is complete and a short spinous process is already present (Fig. 2 C). 158 F. MULLER, R. O RAHILLY AND D. R. BENSON 0~~ O 7 o 0 0~~ 0 C~~~~~C .. MS iLZZD o OZ -0 0 ... 0>>S_-e^°~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C)C> Fig. 1. Radiograph of isolated vertebral column of fetus (S6). In the key drawing, the square surrounds TV10-12. Only the right hand hemicentrum of TVI1I is visible. C, an ossific locus within the cartilaginous costal element of CV7, superomedial to the first thoracic rib. This is potentially but not necessarily a cervical rib (Meyer, 1978). Anomalous vertebrae On radio'graphy (Fig. 1), the ossification centres of the neural arches of TV 10-12 are found to be slightly wider than normal, and the centre for the centrum of TV I11 is small and deviated to the right hand side. In a ventral view (Fig. 3A), the centrum is seen to be cleft sagittally, without cartilaginous continuity between the right and left sides. The right portion, which is considerably larger than the left, is joined by a cartilaginous bridge to the two adjacent vertebrae (Figs. 3A, SC). Origin of vertebral anomalies 159 (A) 8 1mm {C)f Fig. 2(A-C). Graphic reconstructions of normal thoracic vertebrae. (A) Normal thoracic vertebrae 8 and 9 of fetus S6, shown in median section. Spinal ganglia are included in the intervertebral foramina. (B) The same vertebrae on left lateral view. X indicates sectioned rib. Branches of the intercostal arteries are included. (C) Thoracic vertebra 11 of a normal fetus of comparable age, reconstructed from transverse sections and seen from above. The cartilaginous neural arch is complete. The eleventh ribs are short. The spinal cord and ganglia, as well as sympathetic ganglia, are included. N, the future nucleus pulposus. The contiguous vertebrae (TV 10 and 12) appear to be adapting to the lack of vertebral material at the TV 11 level (Fig. 3 A). As seen in a dorsal view (Fig. 3B), the neural arches are closed, as would be expected at this phase of development. A medial view of the left portion of TV 11 shows a ventral deficiency and wedging (Figs. 4 C, 5 B). The adjacent vertebrae are larger, thereby compensating partially for the lack of vertebral mass. A medial view of the right portion shows compression in the middle, accompanied by inadequate expansion ventrally and dorsally. The adjacent vertebrae have expanded into the deficient area. Lateral views indicate that the left side of TV11 is almost normal in height dorsally but is defective ventrally (Fig. 4D), whereas the larger, right hand side appears more nearly normal, although it is slightly wedged ventrally (Figs. 4A, 5A). Projections in a transverse plane reveal clearly the distribution of vertebral material between the right and left portions of the centrum (Fig. 3 C, D). The cartilaginous bridges to TV 10 (Figs 3 C, 5 C) and TV 12 (Figs 3D, 5 C) extend for a considerable distance dorsoventrally. A slight partition in the median plane is visible in TV 12. Notochord The notochord (Fig. 3 A) is very slightly deviated to the right hand side from TV9 to LV 1 and passes through the right hand component of TV 11 (Fig. 5 C). No signs 160 F. METLLER, R. O'RAHILLY AND D. R. BENSON (D) 1 mm Fig. 3(A-D). Graphic reconstructions of thoracic vertebrae 1-12 offetus S6. (A) Ventral view. The butterfly vertebra (TV 1 1) is seen to consist of two parts, the larger of which is connected by cartilaginous bars with the suprajacent and subjacent centra. The right twelfth rib is continuous with the transverse process of TV 12. The pattern of the arteries is abnormal on the left side. (B) Dorsal view. All three neural arches are complete. (C) Inferior aspect of TV 11 projected onto TV10. The black area represents a section through the bar from TV 12. N, notochord. (D) Superior aspect of TV 11 projected onto TV 12. The black area represents a section through the bar from TV10. of notochordal duplication are present. The forerunners of the nuclei pulposi are small between TV11 and the adjacent vertebrae, and that between TV 12 and LV1 is branched (Fig. 3A). Intervertebral discs The discs (Fig. 5 D) between the left portion of TV 11 and the adjacent vertebrae appear to be transversely placed rings and the upper and lower rings seem to be fused by a mass of fibrous tissue towards the median plane. Intervertebral discs in relation to the right portion of TV 11 are present only at the periphery and are separated by the centrum. In brief, TV 11 is in contact with the adjacent vertebrae without the intervention of disc material in the central areas of both the right and left portions of the upper and lower discs. (This deficiency of disc material might favour bony fusion of TV 10-12 at a later period, resulting in a block vertebra.) Intervertebral foramina The openings are larger on the right side (Figs. 4A, B, SD) than on the left (Fig. 4 C, D) and, on both sides of the malformation, they are larger than in the Origin of vertebral anomalies 161 1 mm V Fig. 4 (A-D). Graphic reconstructions of thoracic vertebrae 10-12 of fetus S6. (A) Right lateral view. X indicates a sectioned rib. (B) Right portion of sectioned column, medial aspect. The notochord is outlined. Two vascular canals on the dorsal aspect of TV 10 are noticeable. (C) Left portion of sectioned column, medial aspect. (D) Left lateral view. X indicates a sectioned rib. normal spine at the level of TV 8/9 (Figs. 2A, B, 6F). The spinal ganglia lie close to the inferior vertebral notches. Ribs The ribs of TV 1 1 and 12 are abnormal. Rib 11 on the left side is short, articulates with the centrum of TV 11 only and fails to articulate with the transverse process. Rib 11 on the right side is shorter and articulates with centra 10 and 11 (Fig. 4A). Joint cavities have not yet appeared. The twelfth ribs are short and are not visible radiographically. That on the right side is fused with the centrum of TV 12 (Fig. 3A). Arteries The segmental (intercostal) arteries to the vertebrae show a normal pattern on the right hand side (Figs. 3 A, 4A). On the left side, however, intercostal arteries 10 and 11 share a common stem, whereas the subcostal artery is very narrow and extends no 162 F. MULLER, R. O'RAHILLY AND D. R. BENSON ;- .... .. .- 4- ..... .. .: r: st ... ': - .. ss ..''. -.. \:..........' ....:..::,;," :x2, w.t i. * ^ tL:;_-.z...:E.'.;.::*:.:3.}.*'. twli. i. I. *, 3R m m Origin of vertebral anomalies 163 further than rib 12 (Fig. 3A). In spite of these differences the number of branches (2 dorsally and 4 ventrally) entering the malformed centrum is the same as that for centra 10 and 12. Ossification Areas of calcification are present in the centra of TV 10 and 12 and are beginning to be vascularised.
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance

    Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance

    NATIONAL BIRTH DEFECTS PREVENTION NETWORK HTTP://WWW.NBDPN.ORG Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance Edited By Lowell E. Sever, Ph.D. June 2004 Support for development, production, and distribution of these guidelines was provided by the Birth Defects State Research Partnerships Team, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Copies of Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance can be viewed or downloaded from the NBDPN website at http://www.nbdpn.org/bdsurveillance.html. Comments and suggestions on this document are welcome. Submit comments to the Surveillance Guidelines and Standards Committee via e-mail at [email protected]. You may also contact a member of the NBDPN Executive Committee by accessing http://www.nbdpn.org and then selecting Network Officers and Committees. Suggested citation according to format of Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts ∗ Submitted to Biomedical Journals:∗ National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN). Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance. Sever, LE, ed. Atlanta, GA: National Birth Defects Prevention Network, Inc., June 2004. National Birth Defects Prevention Network, Inc. Web site: http://www.nbdpn.org E-mail: [email protected] ∗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:258-265. We gratefully acknowledge the following individuals and organizations who contributed to developing, writing, editing, and producing this document. NBDPN SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE STEERING GROUP Carol Stanton, Committee Chair (CO) Larry Edmonds (CDC) F. John Meaney (AZ) Glenn Copeland (MI) Lisa Miller-Schalick (MA) Peter Langlois (TX) Leslie O’Leary (CDC) Cara Mai (CDC) EDITOR Lowell E.
  • Malformation Syndromes: a Review of Mouse/Human Homology

    Malformation Syndromes: a Review of Mouse/Human Homology

    J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.25.7.480 on 1 July 1988. Downloaded from Joalrn(ll of Medical Genetics 1988, 25, 480-487 Malformation syndromes: a review of mouse/human homology ROBIN M WINTER Fromii the Kennetivdy Galton Centre, Clinlicail Research Centre, Northiwick Park Hospital, Harrow, Middlesex HAI 3UJ. SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to review the known and possible homologies between mouse and human multiple congenital anomaly syndromes. By identifying single gene defects causing similar developmental abnormalities in mouse and man, comparative gene mapping can be carried out, and if the loci in mouse and man are situated in homologous chromosome segments, further molecular studies can be performed to show that the loci are identical. This paper puts forward tentative homologies in the hope that some will be investigated and shown to be true homologies at the molecular level, thus providing mouse models for complex developmental syndromes. The mouse malformation syndromes are reviewed according to their major gene effects. X linked syndromes are reviewed separately because of the greater ease of establishing homology for these conditions. copyright. The purpose of this paper is to review the known even phenotypic similarity would be no guarantee and possible homologies between mouse and human that such genes in man and mouse are homologous". genetic malformation syndromes. Lalley and By identifying single gene defects causing similar following criteria for developmental abnormalities in mouse and man, McKusick' recommend the http://jmg.bmj.com/ identifying gene homologies between species: comparative gene mapping can be carried out, and if (1) Similar nucleotide or amino acid sequence.
  • Fetal Pathology of Neural Tube Defects – an Overview of 68 Cases Fetalpathologie Der Neuralrohrdefekte – Ein Überblick Über 68 NTD-Fälle

    Fetal Pathology of Neural Tube Defects – an Overview of 68 Cases Fetalpathologie Der Neuralrohrdefekte – Ein Überblick Über 68 NTD-Fälle

    GebFra Science | Original Article Fetal Pathology of Neural Tube Defects – An Overview of 68 Cases Fetalpathologie der Neuralrohrdefekte – ein Überblick über 68 NTD-Fälle Authors Deutsche Version unter: Katharina Schoner 1,RolandAxt-Fliedner2, Rainer Bald 3, https:/doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103459 Barbara Fritz 4,JuergenKohlhase5, Thomas Kohl 6, Supporting Information: Helga Rehder 1, 7 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-103459 Affiliations ABSTRACT 1 Institute of Pathology, WG Fetal Pathology, University Introduction The prevalence of neural tube defects world- of Gießen and Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, wide is 1–2 per 1000 neonates. Neural tube defects result Marburg, Germany from a disturbance of neurulation in the 3rd or 4th week of 2 Department of Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital development and thus represent the earliest manifestation of Gießen and Marburg, Gießen, Germany of organ malformation. Neural tube defects (NTD) are classi- 3 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum fied into cranial dysraphism leading to anencephaly or menin- Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany goencephalocele and spinal dysraphism with or without me- 4 Center of Human Genetics, University of Gießen and ningomyelocele. In isolated form they have multifactorial Marburg, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, causes, and the empirical risk of recurrence in Central Europe Germany is 2%. As associated malformations they tend to occur sporad- – 5 Praxis for Human Genetics Center of Preimplantation ically, and in monogenic syndromes they follow Mendelian in- Genetic Diagnosis, Freiburg, Germany heritance patterns with a high risk of recurrence. 6 German Center for Fetal Surgery & minimal-invasive Patients Autopsies were performed on 68 fetuses following a Therapy, University Hospital of Gießen and Marburg, prenatal diagnosis of NTD and induced abortion.
  • HSVMA Guide to Congenital and Heritable Disorders in Dogs

    HSVMA Guide to Congenital and Heritable Disorders in Dogs

    GUIDE TO CONGENITAL AND HERITABLE DISORDERS IN DOGS Includes Genetic Predisposition to Diseases Special thanks to W. Jean Dodds, D.V.M. for researching and compiling the information contained in this guide. Dr. Dodds is a world-renowned vaccine research scientist with expertise in hematology, immunology, endocrinology and nutrition. Published by The Humane Society Veterinary Medical Association P.O. Box 208, Davis, CA 95617, Phone: 530-759-8106; Fax: 530-759-8116 First printing: August 1994, revised August 1997, November 2000, January 2004, March 2006, and May 2011. Introduction: Purebred dogs of many breeds and even mixed breed dogs are prone to specific abnormalities which may be familial or genetic in nature. Often, these health problems are unapparent to the average person and can only be detected with veterinary medical screening. This booklet is intended to provide information about the potential health problems associated with various purebred dogs. Directory Section I A list of 182 more commonly known purebred dog breeds, each of which is accompanied by a number or series of numbers that correspond to the congenital and heritable diseases identified and described in Section II. Section II An alphabetical listing of congenital and genetically transmitted diseases that occur in purebred dogs. Each disease is assigned an identification number, and some diseases are followed by the names of the breeds known to be subject to those diseases. How to use this book: Refer to Section I to find the congenital and genetically transmitted diseases associated with a breed or breeds in which you are interested. Refer to Section II to find the names and definitions of those diseases.
  • 7.1 Birth Defects Code List

    7.1 BIRTH DEFECTS CODE LIST Based on the British Pediatric Association (BPA) Classification of Diseases (1979) and the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) (1979) Code modifications developed by Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Service U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, Georgia 30333 and Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch Epidemiology and Disease Surveillance Unit Texas Department of State Health Services 1100 West 49th Street Austin, TX 78756 Revised July 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction To Birth Defect Diagnosis Coding ................................................................................................. 7 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................ 7 BPA coding system .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Description of the BPA code ............................................................................................................................ 8 Problems with the
  • Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance

    NATIONAL BIRTH DEFECTS PREVENTION NETWORK HTTP://WWW.NBDPN.ORG Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance Edited By Lowell E. Sever, Ph.D. June 2004 Support for development, production, and distribution of these guidelines was provided by the Birth Defects State Research Partnerships Team, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Copies of Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance can be viewed or downloaded from the NBDPN website at http://www.nbdpn.org/bdsurveillance.html. Comments and suggestions on this document are welcome. Submit comments to the Surveillance Guidelines and Standards Committee via e-mail at [email protected]. You may also contact a member of the NBDPN Executive Committee by accessing http://www.nbdpn.org and then selecting Network Officers and Committees. Suggested citation according to format of Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts ∗ Submitted to Biomedical Journals:∗ National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN). Guidelines for Conducting Birth Defects Surveillance. Sever, LE, ed. Atlanta, GA: National Birth Defects Prevention Network, Inc., June 2004. National Birth Defects Prevention Network, Inc. Web site: http://www.nbdpn.org E-mail: [email protected] ∗International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:258-265. We gratefully acknowledge the following individuals and organizations who contributed to developing, writing, editing, and producing this document. NBDPN SURVEILLANCE GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS COMMITTEE STEERING GROUP Carol Stanton, Committee Chair (CO) Larry Edmonds (CDC) F. John Meaney (AZ) Glenn Copeland (MI) Lisa Miller-Schalick (MA) Peter Langlois (TX) Leslie O’Leary (CDC) Cara Mai (CDC) EDITOR Lowell E.
  • Cephaloceles and Related Malformations

    Cephaloceles and Related Malformations

    Cephaloceles and Related Malformations Thomas P. Naidich, 1 Nolan R. Altman, Bruce H. Braffman, David G. MeLone, and Robert A. Zimmerman From Baptist Hospital of Miami, Miami, FL (TPN); Miami Children's Hospital, Miami, FL (NRA); Radiology Associates of Hollywood, Hollywood, FL (BHB); Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL (DGM); and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA (RAZ) This chapter addresses the gross pathology 1. Cranial meningoceles are cephaloceles in and imaging of anencephaly, exencephaly and which the structures protruding consist cephaloceles, and includes the clinical, epidemi­ solely of leptomeninges and cerebrospinal ologic, and pathologic features that have helped fluid (CSF). the authors to understand these conditions and 2. Cranial glioceles are cephaloceles in which to contribute meaningfully to their diagnosis and the structures protruding consist only of a management. This paper specifically excludes the glial-lined cyst containing CSF (22). fronto-ethmoidal (sincipital) cephaloceles, the re­ 3. Cranial meningoencephaloceles are cephal­ lated nasal gliomas and nasal dermal sinuses, and oceles in which the structures protruding the median cleft face syndrome, because these consist of leptomeninges, CSF, and brain. subjects have already been reviewed, in detail, in Some authors also distinguish cranial men­ the American College of Radiology Self-Evalua­ ingoencephaloventriculocele in which por­ tion Program No. 28, Neuroradiology Text and tions of the ventricles protrude into the Syllabus (1), in texts (2-6), and in articles (7-22). hernia sac, perhaps in association with her­ niating choroid plexus. Definitions 4. Atretic cephaloceles are formes fruste of cephaloceles that are characterized by a Cranium bifidum occultum designates simple small, noncystic, flat, or nodular lesion sit­ midline or paired paramedian skull defect(s) with­ uated in the midline of the scalp, either near out prolapse of meninges or brain (23).
  • Spina Bifida

    Spina Bifida

    International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2019, Vol 7(2.1):6390-96. ISSN 2321-4287 Original Research Article DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2019.124 SPINA BIFIDA - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Amandeep Kaur 1, Mahesh Sharma2 1 Demonstrator, Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College & Hospital, Anatomy De- partment, E- block, Sector 32-, Chandigarh, India. *2 Professor & Head of the Department, MBBS, MS Human Anatomy, Government Medical College & Hospital, Anatomy Department, E- block, Sector 32-, Chandigarh, India. ABSTRACT Background: The occurrence of congenital anomalies is increasing in the present era. The incidence is estimated to be 3-7% of the congenital disorders. Aim: The present study is focused on the spina bifida and to know the incidence of spinal defects in north Indian population. This study will be helpful for providing baseline data from the north Indian population. Methodology: The present study was done on 1400 fetuses which were sent by gynecology and obstetrics department of GMCH Sec. 32, Chandigarh to anatomy department for autopsy purpose during period of 2008 to 2017. In every case, location and morphology of spinal defects were observed. Results: The present study showed 11.7% cases with spinal defects, out of these, 1.2% spina bifida closed (occulta) and 10.5% spina bifida open defects were noted which included 1.2% ventral spinal defects, 31.7% with meningocele, 24.3% myelomeningocele, 28.6% myelocele and 12.8% with rachischisis. Conclusions: It is important to note the detection of congenital anomalies in early stage of gestation. It is advantageous for the obstetrician in planning the line of management whether to continue the pregnancy or not.
  • NEURAL TUBE DISORDERS Dev3 (1)

    NEURAL TUBE DISORDERS Dev3 (1) Neural Tube Disorders (s. Dysraphism) Last updated: January 16, 2021 Classification .................................................................................................................................... 1 ETIOPATHOPHYSIOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 1 Theories ............................................................................................................................................ 1 Etiology ............................................................................................................................................ 1 EPIDEMIOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 1 CLASSIFICATION, PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL FEATURES ........................................................................... 1 CRANIOSCHISIS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Encephalocele (s. Cephalocele) ........................................................................................................ 2 SPINA BIFIDA ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Myelomeningocele ........................................................................................................................... 4 DIAGNOSIS...............................................................................................................................................
  • Congenital CNS Anomalies (General)

    GENERAL - CONGENITAL CNS ANOMALIES Dev1 (1) GENERAL - Congenital CNS Anomalies Last updated: September 5, 2017 CLASSIFICATION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 ETIOPATHOPHYSIOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 2 EPIDEMIOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 2 DIAGNOSIS................................................................................................................................................ 2 CLASSIFICATION ABNORMAL FORMATION OF NOTOCHORD (neurenteric canal disorders): 1) neuro-enteric cyst – due to neurenteric canal persistence. 2) diastematomyelia, diplomyelia – aberrant neuro-entodermal adhesions → split notochord and secondary splitting of neural plate and vertebral bodies. NEURAL TUBE (s. NEURULATION) defects (s. dysraphia, abnormalities of DORSAL induction) - earliest to appear (17-27 days of gestation): 1. Craniorachischisis totalis - total failure of neural tube closure → brain and spinal cord necrosis secondary to exposure to amniotic fluid. iniencephaly = occipital bone defect + cervical dysraphism + head retroflexion. 2. CRANIOSCHISIS, s. CRANIUM BIFIDUM (defects of cranial neuropore closure): anencephaly, exencephaly, encephaloceles, cranial meningoceles. 3. SPINA BIFIDA: a) spina bifida occulta - skin is intact
  • The Changing Landscape in the Genetic Etiology of Human Tooth Agenesis

    The Changing Landscape in the Genetic Etiology of Human Tooth Agenesis

    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review The Changing Landscape in the Genetic Etiology of Human Tooth Agenesis Meredith A. Williams 1 and Ariadne Letra 2,3,4,* ID 1 University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry, Houston, TX 77054, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry, Houston, TX 77054, USA 3 Center for Craniofacial Research, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry, Houston, TX 77054, USA 4 Pediatric Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX 77030, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-713-486-4228 Received: 3 April 2018; Accepted: 9 May 2018; Published: 16 May 2018 Abstract: Despite much progress in understanding the genetics of syndromic tooth agenesis (TA), the causes of the most common, isolated TA remain elusive. Recent studies have identified novel genes and variants contributing to the etiology of TA, and revealed new pathways in which tooth development genes belong. Further, the use of new research approaches including next-generation sequencing has provided increased evidence supporting an oligogenic inheritance model for TA, and may explain the phenotypic variability of the condition. In this review, we present current knowledge about the genetic mechanisms underlying syndromic and isolated TA in humans, and highlight the value of incorporating next-generation sequencing approaches to identify causative and/or modifier genes that contribute to the etiology of TA.
  • Glossary of Key Terms for Teratology

    Glossary of Key Terms for Teratology

    Glossary of Key Terms for Teratology Maria dos Anjos Pires and Ana M. Calado Introduction Teratology (from the Greek, teratos, monster) is the science that studies birth defects, congenital malformations, or developmental disorders and is a complex science to understand. The effort to make it more accessible comprises the construction of a glossary with the most routine used terms, making them more comprehen- sive and accessible. The purpose of this glossary is to make this subject more understandable for all those who want or need to learn this subject. Glossary Abiotrophy A group of diseases that are characterized by the premature spontaneous neuron degeneration, and also storage neuron diseases that affected them diffusely. It is limited to a metabolic development and intrinsic error to the neuron that limits its viability and is identified in the inborn. Acardia Absence of the heart. Severe congenital defect conjoint with other anom- alies present in one element of a pair of twin. Achondroplasia Anomaly subsequent to a defect of bone grown resulting in an insuffi- cient growth (dwarfism), associated with other skeletal abnormalities (macrocephaly, kyphosis, short limbs). Acromegaly Disproportional enlargement of the face, hands, and feet. Luís Félix (ed.), Teratogenicity Testing: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1797, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7883-0, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 595 596 Maria dos Anjos Pires and Ana M. Calado Agenesis or aplasia Complete absence of an organ due to nonappearance of its primor- dium in the embryo (examples: anencephaly, cyclopia, amelia, renal agenesis).