Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of in the

Baselining Towards an IP Human Rights Observatory

Prepared by: ESCR (Economic, Social, Cultural Rights) Center Human Rights Centers Management Office (HRC-MO) Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Philippines Background - Context & Objectives • 2017 - 20 years of IPRA implementation, 10 years after adoption of UNDRIP • Objectives of the IP National Inquiry were: ✓ Identify adherence of laws, policies, rules, regulations, programmes, and projects concerning Indigenous Peoples with the standards of human rights; ✓ Settle issues of facts relevant to the human rights situation of Indigenous Peoples (IPs) with focus on the three main thematic concerns: 1) the protection and promotion of the Indigenous Peoples' land and cultural rights, 2) the effectiveness of the current government process to obtain the Free, Prior and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples; and 3) the state of economic and social development of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines; ✓ Review the impacts of the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 and identify areas of improvement; and ✓ Increase understanding of human rights generally and commitment to better human rights observance through collaborative efforts that the Indigenous Peoples, as rights- holders, and the duty-bearers shall identify through the guidance of the Commission on Human Rights as lead convenor of the National Inquiry. Background - Players & Process • 2017 - National IP Rights Inquiry ✓ 67 Tribes (10-, 10 MIMAROPA, 11 mainland, 18 Central , 18 BaSulTa & Southern Mindanao) - 180 IP Reps ✓ 424 participants (41% were women, > 10% young persons) ✓ 20 NGAs (NCIP, NCCA, DENR, PSA, DA, DENR, DEpED, DSWD, DILG, NAPC, PNP, AFP, Minda, PCSD, DoT, DoH, DOLE, SSS, NHA, NEDA) ✓ Spent 4M PhP reprenting 89% of allocation Background - Players & Process IP Tribes consulted: Akeanon Bukidnon, Ati Tumalalod, Ati Tina Hamtic, Iraynon Bukidnon, Panay Bukidnon, Sulod Bukidnon, Eskaya, Ata/Ati, Tribu Bukidnon, Tagbanua, Cagayanen, Palaw'an, Buhid, Sibuyan , Taubuid, Mangyan Tagabukid, Ati, Bantoanon, Cuyonan, Batac, Dumagat, Ayta/Agta, Dumagat-Remontado, Kankanaey, Abeling, Bago, Ilongot, Manide, Kalanguya, Ayta Abellen, Teduray, Lambangian, T'boli, Erumanen ne Menuvu, Tagakaulo, Matigsalog, Dulangan Manobo, Bagobo-Tagabawa, Manobo-B’laan, Dibabawon, Mansaka, Mandaya, Ata- Manobo, Kalagan, Ata, Obu-Manobo, Bagobo-Klata, Sama, Sama of Tandubas, Sama-Dilaut of Sitangkai, Sama of Jolo, Yakan of Basilan, Sama of Simunul, Tausug of Jolo, Bajau of Bangas Island, Kolibugan of Zamboanga Sibugay, Sama Bajau of Zamboanga City, Sama Banguingui of Zamboanga City, Kolibugan of Zamboanga del Norte, Talaandig of Talakag, Bukidnon, Umayamnon of Bukidnon, Mamanwa/Kaotawan of Surigao del Sur, Banwaon of Agusan del Sur, Higaonon. Background - Players & Process

USE OF A NATIONAL INQUIRY PROCESS patterned after the reporting cycle of the human rights treaty bodies.

It involved a series of public hearings and workshops. The Workshops focus on conducting a GAP Analysis of State Duty bearers actions & Reporting Cycle of the Human Rights treaty bodies consultation on IPHRO Background - Explaining IP Rights As per IPRA*: 4 Bundles of Rights 1. Right to Ancestral Domain and Land 2. Right to Self Governance & Empowerment 3. Right to Social Justice & Human Rights 4. Right to Cultural Integrity

(*) IPRA – Indigenous Peoples Rights Act

Right to Development

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings a) Indigenous identity is threatened and their is insufficient protection for the right to cultural integrity b) Non-IP's encroachment into ancestral domains as a threat to the indigenous identity c) Limitations to the right of ownership over ancestral domains d) Wanton violations and confusion on the scope of free, prior and informed consent of IPs e) Undermining of IPs' decision-making processes and governance structures; f) Insufficient actions by the state duty bearers to fulfill the Right to Development of IPs h) Insufficient protection and continuing discrimination of the most vulnerable sectors of the IP Community (i.e. women, children, elderly, nomads, IDPs, youth)

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Indigenous identity is threatened

✓ Insufficient government data on IPs affecting programming of government services ✓ Lack of universal standard on what constitute native identity ✓ Insufficient civil registration of IPs with accessibility & discrimination issues ✓ Insufficient comprehensive, updated and consolidated documentation or study about IP customs and traditions ✓ In Mindanao, are not sufficiently recognize in the current negotiation for the proposed BBL

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Non-IP's encroachment into ancestral domains as a threat to the indigenous identity

✓ Amidst only 7.92% or 5M hectares for 1.1M of the 14M estimated IPs having been issued 206 CADTs, there are even numerous documented cases of past and ongoing enchroachment of non IPs in ADs ✓ Overlapping claims by other stakeholders facilitated by some national government agencies for other land uses (including extrative industries, plantations) also threatens ADs ✓ Compared to other competing claims, processing of CADT until registration remains relatively slow despite efforts to fact track like the JAO 1- 2012 affecting access to services and development funding & encouraging enchroachments leading to disposession

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Limitations to the right of ownership over ancestral domains

✓ While the law recognizes the IPs' right of ownership over ADs and all resources found therein, such right is limited by, or otherwise subjected to, conditions provided in other national laws and regulations on the environment (e.g. affecting log cutting & utilization rights, affecting mining by IPs in areas outside declared minahang bayan, etc) ✓ Unequal & discriminatory application of certain environmental laws in favor of big private companies against IPs ✓ No longer able to live exclusively on their own, IPs find themselves in legal disputes with IPs from other tribes and non- IPs with resolutions they have to pursue in regular courts and not just in NCIP as per latest jurisprudence increasing difficulty for IPs

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings Wanton violations & confusion on the scope of free, prior and informed consent of IPs

✓Numerous cases described in various testimonies in the national inquiry by IP leaders point to various violations of FPIC from implementation of DENR's NGP, to comprehensive land use, tp projects for ecotourism water reservoir, agribusinesses, energy, mining operations, quarrying, IFMAs, etc. ✓Difficulty for non IPs in securing FPIC due to tedious processes and the insistence of FPIC by IP tribes not claiming CADTs therefor their claim to their ADs are not recognized per government records ✓Various efforts to amend policies & procedures on securing FPIC to clarify decision making of IPs, the perceived impracticality of the process, etc are ongoing

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Process Flow of Securing Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC)

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Undermining of IPs' decision-making processes and governance structures

✓ Confusion on FPIC process indicates insufficient or lack of understanding about the decision-making and governance structures of the IPs. ✓ While by law and implementation there are efforts in mainstreaming IPS in Philippine polity with the recognition of IPs, setting up of IPOs and now the appointment of IPMRs duly selected by the IP communities and certified by the NCIP. But this is insufficiently implemented and in the case of IPMRs, there are cases where LGUs do not recognize them

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Insufficient Actions by the State Duty Bearer to Fulfill the Rights to Development of IPs

✓ IPs availing government programs on livelihood, work opportunities, education, health, housing, and the corresponding facilities are limited by access being in GIDAs (Geographically Isolated and Disadvantaged Areas) and those formulated are restrictive because it did not consider their situation despite some 138 IP groups that have formulated their own ADSDPPs ✓ There are no sustainable funding source to fully implement existing ADSDPPs. There is no categorical commitment in law on the part of government to provide the budget to implement the programs in the ADSDPPs

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

All of these challenges, despite various efforts of state duty bearers to provide opportunities for development for IP communities (PROGRAMS)

✓ NCIP's Human, Economic and Environmental Development and Protection Services, Education Assistance Program, Merit-based Scholarship, Health Programs ✓ Representation of IPs and IPOs in the Bottom-Up Budgeting (BUB) Grievance Redress Committee and the Local Poverty Reduction Action Team (LPRAT) in their respective LGUs ✓ MindA's IP Development Plan, DepEd's IPEd, DENR's IP Desk & IP Program, DOLE's IP Desk, NCCAs school of living traditions. DoH IP health program

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

All of these challenges, despite various efforts of state duty bearers to provide opportunities for development for IP communities (PROGRAMS)

✓ SSS' Accreditation Program under Cooperatives and Informal Sector Group, including IPs; subsidy program; AlkanSSSya Program; JO-KaltaSSS Program ✓ NEDA CAR-Regional Development Council Program for social preparation of Cordillera into an Autonomous Region ✓ DAs Special Agricultural Area Development Project, wherein priority beneficiaries are IPs

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

All of these challenges, despite various efforts of state duty bearers to provide opportunities for development for IP communities (POLICIES)

✓ DoH’s & LGUs no home birthing policies ✓ JAO 1-2012 of NCIP, LRA, DENR, DAR to expedite resolution of overlapping claims of various tenurial instruments towards registration of actual titles of CADT ✓ DENR’s National Greening Program (NGPs) ✓ DepEd’s IPEd relevant guidelines on accrediting teachers for IPs and IP schools ✓ DSWD’s expanded coverage of the 4Ps program in geographically difficult areas

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

All of these challenges, despite various efforts of state duty bearers to provide opportunities for development for IP communities (POLICIES)

✓ DPWH’s funding for IP school buildings for LGUs ✓ IP focus special civil registration mechanisms of PSA as well as special arrangement of accrediting traditional IP leaders as solemnizing officials of weddings ✓ Inclusion of IP related considerations in collecting relevant information on the Barangay information systems of DILG ✓ The imposition of 1% of investments through the RDCs to be dedicated for IPs as well as the representation mechanism in RDCs open for IPs

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Further Study Needs to Be Done on the Impacts of these Initiatives to IPs

✓ The GAD programs and utilization of GAD budget being monitored and promoted by the PCW ✓ The agricultural and fisheries development program of DA and DAR ✓ The ecotourism programs of DOT and DENR ✓ The seal of excellence incentive mechanisms of DILG where IP programs are considered

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Key Findings

Insufficient protection and continuing discrimination of the vulnerable sectors of the IP Community (i.e. women, children, elderly, nomads, IDPs, youth)

✓ Among IP Youth, despite them being conscious of their role to preserve their groups' cultural heritage, there is insufficient opportunities to develop their potential, particularly through education and employment opportunities ✓ While the plight of IP elderly, IP nomads, IP IDPs were noted in the national inquiry, there is very little detailed assessment of their situation

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

Ancestral Domains Not Secured Self Governance Not Established Insufficient support to socio-economic Insufficient protection of most vulnerable or are Threatened. FPIC Violated IP Representation in Local Governance & cultural development needs of IPs sectors of IP communities: a) women, Not Maximized or Under Threat through ADSDPP full implementation b) children, c) youth, d) IDPs, e) elderly, IP Displaced, Dispossessed and f) nomads

IP Rights Not Considered in EFFECTS Autonomy & Peace Talks Efforts

Key Problem: Non-fulfillment of IP Rights Right to Right to Self Right to Social Right to Ancestral Governance and Justice & Cultural Human Rights Domain & Land Empowerment Integrity

CAUSES

Slow processing of CADTs Non Recognition of some IPMRs by LGUs CADT & ADSDPP taken for granted

Insufficient capacity of key state Conflicts within the Ancestral Domain due Continued discrimination of IPs duty bearers to fulfill obligations to: a) development aggression driven by in various forms and in day to for IP rights promotion, resource conflicts, b) external conflicts of day life experiences protection & fulfillment opposing forces brought in the ADs causing division among IP community members Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

Ancestral HIERARCHY OF EFFECTS Domains Not Secured or are Threatened. FPIC Self Governance Violated Not Established IP Displaced, IP Representation Insufficient support Dispossessed in Local Governance Not to socio-economic Maximized or & cultural Under Threat development needs of IPs Insufficient through ADSDPP protection of most full vulnerable sectors implementation of IP communities: a) women, b) children, c) youth, d) IDPs, e) elderly, IP Rights Not Considered in Autonomy and Peace Talk Efforts and f) nomads Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

ROOTING THE CAUSES In violation of the Right to Ancestral Domain and Land, the processing of CADTs have been painstakingly slow and have slowed down even further with the deadlock of the process of implementation of JAO 1 Series of 2012; which ironically, was intended to fast tracked the registration of the proof of recognition of these native titles. Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

ROOTING THE CAUSES In violation of the Right to Self-Governance and Empowerment, the non- recognition of IMPRs by some LGUs disenfranchises IPMRS from fulfilling their mandate to represent the interests of the IP communities in local governance. Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

ROOTING THE CAUSES In violation of the Right to Social Justice & Human Rights as well as the Right to Cultural Integrity, the disregard for the CADT as well as the ADSDPP representing the development aspiration of IP communities further hinders the fulfillment of IP Rights Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis ROOTING THE CAUSES

Slow processing of CADTs Non Recognition of some IPMRs by LGUs CADT & ADSDPP taken for granted

Insufficient capacity of key Conflicts within the Ancestral Domain Continued state duty bearers to fulfill due to: a) development aggression driven by resource conflicts, b) external discrimination of IPs in obligations for IP rights various forms and in day conflicts of opposing armed groups promotion, protection & brought in the ADs causing division to day life experiences fulfillment among IP community members Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis CHALLENGES & KEY ISSUES NCIPs 14 Thematic CHR IP National Inquiry Root

Areas of Challenges Recurring Issues Reported Causes CONFLICTS IN IN AD CONFLICTS

1. Formal Recognition of Ancestral Domains INSUFFICINET INSUFFICINET CAPACITY STATE OF DUTY

2. Control & Management of ADs 1. Secure Ancestral Domain, Land, 5. Protection 5. of tMostVulnerable IPSectors

12. NCIP Capacitytodeliver Mandates & Integrity of Ecosystem and 3. Destruction of Ecosustems within ADs 13. LAck of Information on IPRights Free, Prior, Informed Consent

4. Non Compliance & Violation of FPIC DISRCRIMINATION 14. Disrcrimination

5. Overlapping Claims Over Ancestral conflicts) agrressionarmed and Development to (due BEARERS Domains 6. Displacement from Ancestral Domains 2. Self Governance & Representation 7. IP Governance is Weak

8. Non Recognition of IP Leaders

9. Impact of Government Services Not Felt 3. Supporting IP Socio-Economic, Cultural Devt through ADSDPP 10. IP Cultural Disintegration Full Implementation 11. Peace & Security 4. Full Consideration of IP Rights in Autonomy & Peace Talk Efforts Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

Secure Ancestral Domain for IPs Full Establishment of Self Governance Secure sufficient support to socio- Ensure full protection of the most Maximized & Stabilized Accountable economic & cultural development vulnerable sectors of IP communities: a) Impose FPIC women, b) children, c) youth, d) IDPs, e) Resettlement and Repossesion IP Representation in Local Governance needs of IPs through the full implementation of the ADSDPP elderly, and f) nomads

IP Rights Fully Considered in ENDS Autonomy & Peace Talks Efforts

Key Solution: Human Rights Based Approach to Monitoring & Evaluation of IP Rights Fulfillment

Right to Right to Self Right to Social Right to Ancestral Governance and Justice & Cultural Human Rights Domain & Land Empowerment Integrity MEANS

Direct IP Communities-CHR IP Rights Knowledge Capacity Building on IP Rights Extensive Information, Education and Management System LINK to IP Rights Promotion, Protection & Communications to combat culture of Protection Services Referrals and Follow discrimination of IPs Fulfillment including M&E Through Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis

Sufficient protection of most vulnerable HIERARCHY OF ENDS sectors of IP communities: a) Sufficient support women, to socio-economic b) children, c) youth, & cultural d) IDPs, e) elderly, development and f) nomads Self Governance needs of IPs Established through ADSDPP IP Representation full in Local implementation Governance Ancestral Maximized with Domains Secured. No Threats FPIC Enforced IP Resettlement & Repossession IP Rights Fully Considered in Autonomy & Peace Talks Efforts Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis HOW IS HRBA APPLIED TO M&E OF IP RIGHTS FULFILLMENT ?

ELEMENTS OF A HUMAN RIGHTS BASED ELEMENTS OF AN MONITORING & EVALUATION APPROACH (HRBA) OF IP RIGHTS FULFILLMENT • Focus on Process and Outcome • IPHRO Programs & Result Outcomes • Emphasizing Realizing Rights • 4 Bundles of IP Rights • IPs Right to Development • Recognized Individual & Group Rights as • Rights Holders: IPs, IPOs, IPMRs Claims Towards Legal and Moral Duty • Duty Bearers: NGA (NCIP, other NGAs, LGUs) Bearers Non State Actions (e.g. Corporations) IP-FOCUSED CSOs IPMRs • Individuals are Entitled to Assistance • IP Rights Observatory Network of Partners & Service Providers • Focuses on Structural Causes & their • Focus on IP Rights Violation Systemic Issues Manifestations (1) Securing Ancestral Domain and Ecological & Cultural Integrity (2) Self-Governance & Representation (through the IPS, IPOs, IPMRs) (3) Supporting Socio-Economic & Cultural Development of IPs through full implementation of their ADSDPP (4) Protecting Most Vulnerable IP Sectors (5) Ensuring IP Rights in Autonomy & Peace Talk Efforts Assessment - Problem Tree Analysis CONFRONTING THE ROOT CAUSES Insufficient capacity of key Conflicts within the Ancestral Domain Continued state duty bearers to fulfill due to: a) development aggression driven by resource conflicts, b) external discrimination of IPs in obligations for IP rights various forms and in day conflicts of opposing armed groups promotion, protection & brought in the ADs causing division to day life experiences fulfillment among IP community members

S O L U T I O N S

Direct IP Communities – CHR Extensive Information, Capacity Building on IP Education and Knowledge Management Rights Promotion, System LINK to IP Rights Communications to Protection & Fulfillment Protection Services Referral combat culture of including on IP Rights M&E & Follow Through discrimination of IPs Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO ANCESTRAL DOMAIN & LAND Key Issue Area 1: Securing Ancestral Domain, Enforcing FPIC and Ensuring Ecological Integrity CHALLENGES: 1. Formal Recognition of Ancestral Domains 5. Non-compliance & violation of FPIC 2. Control & Management of Ancestral Domains 6. Lack of Information on IP Rights 3. Overlapping Claims over Ancestral Domains 7. Discrimination 4. Displacement of IPS from their Ancestral Domains 8. Lack of NCIP Capacity to Deliver its Mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING & INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 1. Delays in JAO 1-2012 (Titling) JAO 1-2012 Inter JAO 1-212 Involvement of IPs Many IP groups not regisration of Agency Comm implementation in JAO 1-2012 and aware of JAO on CADTs & Increase funding of further delayed JAO on legal legal assistance and development of NCIP throughj PIPE Proj Devt CADT processing. assistance not clear how to avail this ADSDPP Project for AD Monitoring of NCIP service delineation & for PIPEs Proj SC decision on ADSDPP devt jurisdiction of NCIP on IP-related cases JAO (NCIP, DoJ) on JAO TWG further limited legal assistance capacity to resolve CADT claim conflicts

Sufficiency of NCIP budget increase for CADT delineation & ADSDPP Devt unclear Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO ANCESTRAL DOMAIN & LAND Key Issue Area 1: Securing Ancestral Domain, Enforcing FPIC and Ensuring Ecological Integrity CHALLENGES: 1. Formal Recognition of Ancestral Domains 5. Non-compliamce & violation of FPIC 2. Control & Management of Ancestral Domains 6. Lack of Information on IP Rights 3. OVerlapping Claims over Ancestral Domains 7. Discrimination 4. Displacement of IPS from their Ancestral Domains 8. Lack of NCIP Capacity to Deliver its Mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E IMPLEMENTATION PLANNNG, INFORMATION, PROBLEMS SYSTEM MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 2. Non Recognition NCIP conducts QRM for IPRVs Insufficient Insufficient Insufficient of the nature of continues IEC of presence of NCIP at monitoring & orientation among native titles of IP ADs CADTs as native Reports of Regional the local levels remedial actions to many sectors on Ancestral titles w/ collective Hearing Officers limits IEC work counter IP the nature of native Domains ownership by IP (NCIP) displacement titles by IPs communities Project Devt Monitoring of IEC projects 3. Violation or lack Review of QRM for IPRVs Due to lack of Insufficient For the public & of enforcement implementaton of budget of the state, monitoring & other stakeholders of FPIC & DENR waiver project proponents remedial actions to FPIC processes policies/practices clauses of that applying for FPIC counter FPIC remain unclear and that circumvent circumvents FPIC ends up paying for violations or limits 3rd party FPIC its cost and in the cicumventions monitoring to Guidelines for process exercising ensure varying procedures undue influence transparency & on FPIC accountability Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO ANCESTRAL DOMAIN & LAND Key Issue Area 1: Securing Ancestral Domain, Enforcing FPIC and Ensuring Ecological Integrity CHALLENGES: 1. Formal Rcognition of Ancestral Domains 5. Non-compliamce & violation of FPIC 2. Control & Management of Ancestral Domains 6. Lack of Information on IP Rights 3. OVerlapping Claims over Ancestral Domains 7. Discrimination 4. Displacement of IPS from their Ancestral Domains 8. Lack of NCIP Capacity to Deliver its Mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 4. Insufficient Natural resource Regular monitoring Some DENR There is insufficient There is insufficient natural resource mgnt & by DENR & LGUs on conservation monitoring system research on IKS on mgnt & weak conservation are safe water & clean efforts like for culturally-driven natural resource enforcement & part of the ADSDPP air from AD areas protected area conservation & mgnt and climate monitoring of but have not been mgnt, NGP results natural resource actions which is environmental fully implemented IP Desk and an IP to conflicting claims mgnt interventions under the control laws in devt Program accross the in ancestral of IPs in their ADs of the concern IP activities in ADs DENR & LGU natural DENR domains community resulting to resurce mgnt & There is also no ecological conservation PPAss There is insufficient systematic damage are often also regular monitoring system applied to a limited consultations on climate change extent in ADs between adaptation & companies mitigation -related Bill on Indigenous operating in ADs & interventions in Community IP communities ADs Conserved Area pending Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNANCE & EMPOWERMENT Key Issue Area 2: Establishing Self-Governance & Empowerment of Indigenous Peoples CHALLENGES: 1) IP Governance is Weak 4) Discrimination 2) Non recognition of some government agencies & LGUs of some IP leaders 5) Lack of NCIP capacity to deliver its mandates 3)Lack of Information on IP Rights

GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 1. Non recognition DILG and NCIP Reported in the Lack of assertiveness A monitoring There is insufficient of IPMRs by monitors regular program on the part of DILG mechanism with in some localities some LGUs implementation of monitoring of NCIP and NCIP to force appropriate lack of MC on IPMRs and DILG LGUs to comply due indicators on the orientation/re- to limits of mandates level of orientation and 2. Inadequate DILG and NCIP Reported in the Due to low capacity, participation of conscientization knowledge and designing and regular program IPMRs have not yet IPMRs in local process among LGU skills of IPMRs on testing training monitoring of NCIP been able to optimize governance is officials on IP IP rights and local program for NCIP and DILG their representation lacking rights, relevant legislation to access resources IPRA provisions for their respective including fiscal- CHR with UNDESA the mandatory ADs using their support will be nature of IPMRs related functions ADSDPP providing IPMR Trngs 3. IP representation RDC provides for No systematic Most IPMRs are not in RDCs is lacking representation of monitoring on IP yet federated to aid vulnerable sectors representation in RDC their engaging RDCs (e.g. IPMR leagues) Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE & HUMAN RIGHTS | RIGHT TO CULTURAL INTEGRITY Key Issue Area 3: Supporting Socio-Economic and Cultural Development of IPs in their Ancestral Domain through the full implementation of the ADSDPP (Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development Protection Plans) CHALLENGES: 1) IP Cultural Disintegration 3) Discrimination 5) Lack of Information on IP Rights 2) Impacts of Government Services for felt by IPs 4) Lack of NCIP capacity to deliver its mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 1. Insufficient social DepEd has the IPEd DepEd IPEd has The hiring of IPEd IPEd monitoring NCIP conducts IEC on IP services for IPs program that manages monitoring system at teachers still uses the systems adhere to rights to raise IP schools & have all levels including IP same LET board passer HRBA's PANTHER awareness on how IPs due to access relevant guidelines on requirement ADDPPS are integrated issues being in focal persons & even principles accrediting teachers for including IP elders as in development Geographically IP schools Surveys conducted for planning & cultural bearers No IP representation Isolated & the expended 4Ps in programming despite chosen by the IPs in the LIAC for the Disadvantaged Expanded coverage of GIDA for IPs need to be its insufficient budget. the 4Ps in GIDAs themselves reviewed since many NHA IP Housing Most LGUs with IPs Areas (GIDAs), reports surveyors did Support lacks similar IECs mismatched PPAs DPWH funding for IP PSA produces special not complete coverage for IPs due to school buildings for reports monitoring IP Insufficient Guidelines on accessing insufficient data LGUs related registation NHA IP housing project disaggregated data the DPWH funding for on their situation efforts requires that the LGU on IPs ack of IP Schools is not widely IP focus special civil or the IP community known & special capacity to fo IP- registration LGU reports monthly provides counterpart. based program devt. considerations in mechanisms of PSA With the delay of CADT programming to the LIAC (Local registration, this Currently being owing to the NHA's Resettlement Inter Agency becomes limiting remedied with the COmmittee) PIPE project of NCIP unique culturel Assiatance Program providing for 10M/LGU and PSA initiatives context of IPs for IP housing Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE & HUMAN RIGHTS | RIGHT TO CULTURAL INTEGRITY Key Issue Area 3: Supporting Socio-Economic and Cultural Development of IPs in their Ancestral Domain through the full implementation of the ADSDPP (Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development Protection Plans) CHALLENGES: 1) IP Cultural Disintegration 3) Discrimination 5) Lack of Information on IP Rights 2) Impacts of Government Services for felt by IPs 4) Lack of NCIP capacity to deliver its mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 1. Insufficient social Inclusion of IP related Compliance NCIP scholarship for Insufficient There is a need for services for IPs data on the Brgy monitored by DIILG IPs not universal ad integration of more analysis of how information systems only for those who ADSDPP in local other NGA programs due to access that have bearing on issues being in Currently not can maintain a publis administration The imposition of 1% of properly monitored certain grade average processes (CLUP, ELA, how effectively services Geographically investments through may be given to IP w requirement limiting CDP, CIP) by Isolated & the RDCs to be /better cultural many disadvantaged challenged IPMRs Disadvantaged dedicated for IPs sensitivity like: a) GAD NCIP monitors what IPs to get higher limiting access of IP programs and Areas (GIDAs), NCIP continously happens to IP scholars education communities to LGU utilization of GAD mismatched PPAs expanding scholarship after graduation resources for budget, b) agricultural for IPs due to program for desering IP Most Livelihood and development PPAs and fisheries insufficient data students enterprise development program on their situation No specific development RDC Interagency of DA and DAR, c) DA's Special Agri Are ecotourism programs of & special monitoring for IPs programs are not monitoring comm Devt Proj w/IP as treating them similar specifically designed develop HRBA DOT and DENR and considerations in priority beneficiaries now even DA, f) seal programming to other sectors for IPs limiting its monitoring FW & of excellence incentive owing to the IP Health Program access by IPs validare, mainstream mechanisms of DILG. IP FW in Reg Devt unique culturel through RIAC guided by IP Health StratPlan Plans context of IPs Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE & HUMAN RIGHTS | RIGHTS TO CULTURAL INTEGRITY Key Issue Area 4: Protecting the Most Vulerable IP Sectors (women. children, youth. elderly, IDPs, Nomads) and Preparing the Next Generation of IP Leaders CHALLENGES: 1) IP Cultural Disintegration 3) Discrimination 5) Lack of Information on IP Rights 2) Impacts of Government Services for felt by IPs 4) Lack of NCIP capacity to deliver its mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 1. Among IP women DoH and some LGUs CHR conducted an No home birthing Alternative Among medical there is a high have No home inquiry on this for policy is widely implementations as a practitioners, a need incidentceof birthing policies reproductive health opposed by IPs as it is middle ground for this for cultural maternal deaths concerns but there is perceive going issue must be planned conscientization is and some othe no systematic against cultural and implemented such needed for better as: a) training the hilots lowest pre natal monitoring on this practices of IPs as for safer delivery, b) understanding of IPs care rates well as it putting up birthing women's impracticality given facilities nearer the IP predisposition when the access situation. communities, etc it comes to reproductive health 2. Difficulty in IP Government Agencies IP Youth Employment This difficulty of IP youth in getting provide priority for is not systematically youth in securing jobs despite Voc hiring eligible IPs monitored except jobs despite trainings Teach Training or those NCIP scholars is becasue they are even a degree who have graduated subjected to the same regular elligibility where he/she may have an inherent disadvantage Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of Duty Bearers)

RIGHT TO SOCIAL JUSTICE & HUMAN RIGHTS | RIGHTS TO CULTURAL INTEGRITY Key Issue Area 4: Protecting the MOst Vulerable IP Sectors (women. children, youth. elderly, IDPs, Nomads) and Pareparing the Next Generation of IP Leaders CHALLENGES: 1) IP Cultural Disintegration 3) Discrimination 5) Lack of Information on IP Rights 2) Impacts of Government Services for felt by IPs 4) Lack of NCIP capacity to deliver its mandates GAP ANALYSIS SPECIFIC RESPONSES CURRENT M&E PROBLEMS SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & EVALUATION COMMS 3. Many situation of DSWD conducted No regular monitoring Proper cultural LGUs must adopt Public IEC on the deprivation and small studies and on this consientization for programs to provide nature of nomadic discrimination surveys on the plight DSWD staff includinf for nomadic IPS when lifestyles of IP have been of these IP nomads in City/Municial SWDs they venture into nomads is important reported on IP the cities on the nomadic IPs their territories with to reduce ignorance nomads (eg Bajaos as well as well full cultural that often lead to in the city) but no designed social sensitivity of their discrimination comprehensive protection programs situation plan of action should be implemented for them 4. There were Several NGOs and There is no systematic sporadic reports of media documented monitoring of IP girl child soldiers these cases with IP child and IP children There is a need for more comprehensive inquiry on this subject od IP recruited, girl child leaders incuding them in conflict currently rights . This ought to be included as a component of the IPHRO trafficked for in their testimonies in place although prostitution but no occasional report of comprehensive this have been done date was recorded Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR) Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO Cordillera • Manpower • Additional funding for IEC on Administrative • Financial Resources the benefits of autonomy Region • Communication, difficulty in efforts in HR rights fulfillment (CAR) communication with local partners especially in areas where there is no communication signal and likewise the geographical terrain of the Cordilleras Cagayan • Uncooperativeness of some • HR education module Valley tribal leaders in the development specific on IP (Region II) investigation of cases rights & focusing on relevant involving Indigenous People provisions of the 4 bundles of • Accessibility of the area IP rights in the IPRA with • No means of communication emphasis on the legal basis of the ADs (including where there is conflict with economic zones) Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR)

Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO Bicol Region • Lack of special fund to defray • Additional support to IEC (Region V) expenses of activiteis including including that on the IPRA transportation fares for IP provisions on IP rights to participantsLack of reader include such outputs as IEC friendly IEC material on IP materials, trainers training, rights consultation-workshop, seminars & orientations on IP rights to various stakeholders including IPs themselves Negros • Improved Inter-Agency cooperation in • Localize educational materials IslandRegion the delivery of basic services for IP rights coupled with (NIR / Region between NCIP, CHR and other line education and promotional agencies and Civil Society XVIII) Organizations.for the protection and activities Promotion of IP’s rights • Set up a system within the CHR • Creation of favourable environment protection services to prioritize for IP’s school children in terms of violation of IP Rights including trained IP teachers, IP instruction investigations materials and improves participation in school extra-curricular activities • Local government Units with IPs to enact local ordinances for the protection and promotionof IPs against any form of displacement. Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR)

Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO Central • Non-cooperationof male adults • Additional support to IEC with Visayas during the conduct of promotion materials and activities (Region VII) activities. conducted in local languages • Less interaction of the together with an invigorated IP participants during the conduct Day celebrations of promotion activities. • Participation to the activities should be with the knowledge of the tribal leaders or NCIP Eastern • Insufficient Protection Services • More resources to allow for Visayas • Geographical location better collaboration of the CHR (Region VIII) • Lack of dedicated personnel with the LGUs and NCIP on IP- related concerns including with the creation and mobilization of regional network for IPs Davao Region • Communications barrierSafety • Regular conduct of national- (Region XI) and security areas over IP level processes such as IP areasCoordination with CSOs Rights Conventions to provide over IP concerns a space for IPs to air our their issues and concerns Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR)

Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO SOCCSKSARGEN • Lack of specific policy direction • Develop inter-agency (Region XII) on IP issues coordination with wide • Insufficient resources-Budget dissemination of the IP Rights constraints pertaining to their law so that government transportation allowance for reimbursements when they are agencies should understand invited to come to the fully their role in its venue/activity far from their implementation place/residence. • Training/Education for IP • The costs of fare allowance leaders need to be ascertained and • Establish and intensify allotted, however, due to limited partnership and linkages with budget we cannot assure their existing IP organizations complete attendance • Low Capacity in terms of IP alongside with NCIP Rights • Budget appropriation for HR activities where target participants are IPs • Provide promo collaterals and IEC materials for advocacy, education Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR)

Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO SOCCSKSARGEN • Lack of specific policy direction • Mapping of IP territories in all (Region XII) on IP issues regions, draw out the HR and in • Insufficient resources-Budget case of conflict areas, the constraints pertaining to their Humanitarian concerns of the IPs, transportation allowance for specially the divergent and reimbursements when they are peculiar issues and corners from invited to come to the the areas and craft democratically venue/activity far from their a Human Rights-based long term, place/residence. medium term plans and annual • The costs of fare allowance work and financial plans need to be ascertained and • Come up an effective Monitoring allotted, however, due to limited and Evaluation ToolsConduct of budget we cannot assure their periodic Program Implementation complete attendance Reviews (PIR) • Low Capacity in terms of IP Rights Assessment - GAP Analysis (Actions of CHR)

Proposed Enhancements for REGIONS Identified GAPS consideration within the IPHRO SOCCSKSARGEN • Lack of specific policy direction • Sustained support of the IP- (Region XII) on IP issues related PPAsWith the advent • Insufficient resources-Budget of the up-going trend in constraints pertaining to their extractive industries, the transportation allowance for reimbursements when they are Commission must take a step invited to come to the ahead by strengthening its venue/activity far from their regional offices in identified place/residence. regions (as priorities) in the • The costs of fare allowance field of business and human need to be ascertained and rights, rights of the IPs, human allotted, however, due to limited rights and environment, and budget we cannot assure their on the rights-based approach complete attendance • Low Capacity in terms of IP to disaster mgnt Rights • Equally important is carrying out PPAs in addressing gender inequalities and the intersectional discrimination against IP women and girls. GAP Analysis as Basis for IPHRO Programming

• These identified gaps will now GAP ANALYSIS be used as basis for IPHRO IMPLEMENTATION PLANNING, INFORMATION, MONITORING & EDUCATION & Programming of its operative EVALUATION COMMS components

• It will also guide the necessary CAPACITY KNOWLEDGE IEC PROGRAM BUILDING MANAGEMENT rights-based monitoring and PROGRAM PROGRAM evaluation system that all concern government agencies must integrate in their M&E IPHRO PROGRAMMING systems Focus of CHR on IPHRO Monitoring

CHR on our part; through the IPHRO will monitor the compliance of these targets by concerned NGAs but focused on FOCUS of Monitoring of FOCUS OF CHR the protection State Duty Bearers lead by the NCIP Monitoring of the most vulnerable sectors of IP communities; particularly IP women, children, youth, IDPs, elderly and IP nomads Synthesis

How should we understand Human Rights within the context of IP Rights (4 bundles of rights) in the Philippines?

✓ Securing the 4 bundles of rights are pre requisite for achieving the RIGHT to DEVELOPMENT of Filipino IPs. Before the RIGHT TO DEVELOMENT of IPs is pursued, the nature and definition of what development means to Filipino Indigenous Peoples must first be established through the substantial fulfillment of the 4 bundles of IP rights. In this way, the IP communities themselves make the appropriate choice for the nature and pace of development they want to undertake.

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Synthesis

How should we understand Human Rights within the context of IP Rights (4 bundles of rights) in the Philippines?

✓ In the analysis of the problems of non fulfillment of IP rights, it is also evident that their are clear hierarchy of actions that ought to be undertaken as follows:

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Synthesis

What is the Systemic Nature of IP Rights Violations in the Philippines? a) Indigenous identity is threatened and their is insufficient protection for the right to cultural integrity b) Non-IP's encroachment into ancestral domains as a threat to the indigenous identity c) Limitations to the right of ownership over ancestral domains d) Wanton violations and confusion on the scope of free, prior and informed consent of IPs e) Undermining of IPs' decision-making processes and governance structures; f) Insufficient actions by the state duty bearers to fulfill the Right to Development of IPs h) Insufficient protection and continuing discrimination of the most vulnerable sectors of the IP Community (i.e. women, children, elderly, nomads, IDPs, youth) Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

1. Stronger legislation is needed, such as the Ethnic Origin Act, to protect indigenous identity including those IPs outside their ADs considering that that are most vulnerable outside their on domain.

The flagship project of NCIP, known as the Philippine Indigenous Peoples Ethnography (PIPE), must be fully implemented to address this concern, and there should be proper ethnicity questions in the 2020 CPH. Encourage IP participation in MIPLA (Mindanao IP Legislative Assembly) to ensure their indigenous identity is recognize and protected in the process of finalizing the BBL.

Further that such act must ensure separate local civil registry office to handle registration of IPs' vital events and must compel LGUs to intensify free mobile registration for IPs in GIDAs.

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

2. Improve the processes under JAO 1. Set a clear guideline for situation when NCIP En Banc issued a resolution approving the issuance of CADT.

This report is being submitted to the National Steering Committee under JAO 1 to verify with its records the cases involving contentious cases as mentioned during the public hearings.

3. Capacity building for the IPs to avoid misinformation. For example, some IPs would believe that ancestral waters could not be covered under IPRA

4. Need for stronger agency that will protect the IPs from large businesses. FPIC must be enforce through police power

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

5. Regular courts must be capacitated to try and decide legal disputes between IPs and non-IPs

6. NCIP must not only stop in issuing COC for IPMRs. They should assist in seeing through the full performance of IPMR functions. There must be law that recognition of IPMRs is mandatory and not discretionary on the part of the LGU. The NCIP must ensure the validity of the selection process for the IPMR

7. Engage the Mindanao IPMR league, and formalize IPMR league all throughout the country in linkage with IPHRO

8. Full operationalization of IPHRO should be properly and sufficiently finance through GAA allocation within CHR and other relevant government agencies as well as funded from external sources

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

9. Fiscal Monitoring of IP-related public expenditures to track budget, net worth and resources of IPs, including a government-wide tagging of IP-related budget allocation & utilization for the supply side as well as the full accounting of the financial requirements of all ADSDPP for the demand side of fiscal monitoring.

10. Assign IP Desk/Focal points in all government agencies

11. Enact a law on ADSDPP. Capacitate IPs for development planning through IPHRO

12. Include a core group of government agencies in the management of the IPHRO. These agencies are NCIP, DENR, DAR, DSWD, NEDA, NHA, DOH, DepEd, NCCA, PSA

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

13. Initiate tribal barangays where it is already necessary

14. Clarify in law the situation of IPs selling lands

15. There are NCIP guidelines on Right to Ancestral Domain, FPIC, IKSP, but not with how IP Human rights would be observed. The IPHRO will be the venue to develop this

16. IPHRO will fast track investigation and updating of case of killing of IPs.

17. Planning should be per tribe to give due consideration to the cultural context, the indigenous systems and practices of the concerned communities.

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Recommendations

18. Discrimination should be addressed through capacity-building for IPs, beginning with their rights under the law, domestic or international.

19. CHR, through IPHRO, should render legal assistance to nomadic IPs (Refer to Sections 3(a) and 51)

20. Participation of CHR in all regional development council, particularly for culture.

Consolidated 2017 Report on the Human Rights Situation of IPs in the Philippines Towards an IPHRO - Conceptual Framework Towards an IPHRO - Operative Components

1) Extensive Information, Education and Communications to combat culture of discrimination against Indigenous Peoples (IP Rights IEC Program)

2) A Capacity Building on IP Rights Promotion, Protection & Fulfilment incl. M&E (IP Rights Capacity Building Program)

3) Direct IP Communities-CHR IP Rights Knowledge Management System LINK to IP Rights Protection Services Referrals and Follow Through (IP Rights Knowledge Management & Protection Program) Towards an IPHRO - M&E Framework WHAT IS THE O.P.E.R.A. FRAMEWORK? Towards an IPHRO - M&E Framework

IMPACTS

OUTCOMES

Outcomes Policy Efforts Resources Assessment • Elements • Elements • Elements • Elements • HR Norms • HR Norms • HR Norms • HR Norms • Monitoring Techniques • Monitoring Techniques • Monitoring Techniques • Monitoring Techniques OUTPUTS Indicators Indicators Indicators Indicators

•Results of NGA Right to Land and AD Right to Land and AD Right to Land and AD Right to Land and AD IP-related PPAs Right to Self Governance Right to Self Governance Right to Self Governance Right to Self Governance Right to Social Justice & HR Right to Social Justice & HR Right to Social Justice & HR Right to Social Justice & HR Right to Cultural Integrity Right to Cultural Integrity Right to Cultural Integrity Right to Cultural Integrity Indigenous Navigator Indicators

Monitor SDGs Actions by IPs Targeted health programs for IPs Use of Indigenous Languages Special measures for IP Youth Employment Security of IP Rights Defenders Special measures for voctech based o IP traditional occupations

HRBA (Human Rights Based Approach)

MONITORING EVALUATION Towards an IPHRO - Conceptual Framework Summary of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Indicator System

OUTCOME INDICATORS IMPACT INDICATORS Right to ancestral % of ADs % of total number of ADs where: a) Extend of % of all ADs owned and in the domain and land with CADTs applied, b) CADT delineation fulfillment of the possession of IPs secured conducted, c) CADT approved, d) state of its CADT, self approved CADT registered and e) obligation to governing ADSDPP developed & approved promote, protect IPS & and fulfil the Right to self IPOs, % of total LGUs (Brgys, Mun/City, Filipino IPs rights % of all ADs with self governance and functional Provincial) with sitting IPMRs fully to ancestral governance and appropriate empowerment IPMR endorse by the IPS, IPOs of their domain & land, representation in LGUs and representat representation with the status of their rights to self- RDCs ion, level of participation (using HRBA norms governance & implement on level of participation) empowerment, ed rights to social Right to social ADSDPP % of adopted ADSDPP implemented and justice & human % of all AD with ADSDPP fully justice and human and key extent of implementation and immediate rights and rights supported and all identified rights cultural results (outputs and immediate to cultural integrity socio-economic, and cultural developme outcomes) needs provided Right to cultural nt facilities/ % of ADs with school of living traditions, % of all ADs where their integrity mechanis local IP language use in vernacular & culture integrity has been ms in place school instructions, IP schools with IP protected & preserve teachers, functional tribal halls and extent of IKS researches with IPR registered & owned by IPs

Global Indicators SDG actions by IPs Security of IP Rights Defenders Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization

1) Signing a Joint Administrative Order (JAO) among key National Government Agencies establishing a common system of monitoring and evaluation using a human right based approach on the fulfillment of Indigenous Peoples rights led by the CHR and NCIP and involving 9 other key NGAs;

2)Establishing two (2) main Collaborative Mechanisms to implement the provisions of the proposed JAO; namely: a) A Direct IP Community - CHR Monitoring Platform and b) An Inter-Agency/ Multi-Sectoral IP Rights Monitoring Mechanism to include various inter agency TWGs for each of the 4 bundles of IP rights plus a TWG on the autonomy and peace processes; and

3)Institutionalization of the three (3) program components of the IPHRO within the regular operations of the CHR. Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization Program Components, Services & Key Players

Program Services Key Players Components IP Rights IEC • Education Campaign on IP Rights CHR (incl Program among IP Communities RHRC-ARMM) • Orientation on IP Rights to LGUs NCIP and NGAs NCCA • IP Rights and IP Culture Business Conscientization Campaign in Associations Schools DepEd • IP Rights Orientation Among Private Sector (companies operating in Ancestral Domains) • IP Rights Mass and Social Media Campaign Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization Program Components, Services & Key Players Program Services Key Components Players IP Rights • Trainings on IP Rights to IPs, IPOs CHR (incl Capacity and IPMRs RHRC- Building • Trainings on IP Rights to NGA IP ARMM) Program Desks and Programs/Projects NCIP NGOs IPOs Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization Program Components, Services & Key Players

Program Services Key Players Components IP Rights • Online Database Management System on IP Rights CHR Knowledge Monitoring NCIP Management • Annual IP Rights Monitoring & Report NEDA & Protection • IP Rights National Inquiry (2 x every term of govt) IP and NGA Program • Regular convening of the Direct IP Community-CHR representatives Monitoring Platforms at the regional level ( every 6 months). to the various • Regular convening of the various TWGs of the Inter-Agency TWGs, Task Collaborative Mechanism on IP Rights Monitoring (at least Forces and every quarter or when the need arises) Consultative • TWG on AD & Land Forum • TWG on Self-Governance & Empowerment • TWG on Social Justice & Human Rights • TWG on Cultural Integrity • TWG on Autonomy and Peace Talks • Regular convening of the CHR-NCIP-DBM-COA Task Force on IP Rights Fiscal Monitoring (at least once a year) • Regular convening of the BHR Task Force on IP Rights Monitoring (Inter-Agency, Multi-Sectoral National Body) complemented with an IP (IPMR Leagues, IPOs) – CHR – NCIP – Business – CSO Consultative Forum at the Regional and National Levels on IP Rights and BHR ( at least once a year) Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization

IP COMMUNITIES Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization

PROPOSED COLLABORATIVE MECHANISMS FOR IPHRO

• Proposed Inter-Agency / Multi-SectoralTWGs Monitoring Key Thematic Areas of the 4 Bundles of IP Rights (AD & Land, Self- Governance & Empowerment, Social Justice & Human Rights, Cultural Integrity) • Proposed CHR-NCIP-DBM-COA Task Force on IP Rights Fiscal Monitoring • Proposed BHR Task Force on IP Rights Monitoring (Inter- Agency, Multi-Sectoral National Body) complemented with an IP (IPMR Leagues, IPOs) – CHR – NCIP – Business – CSO Consultative Forum at the Regional and National Levels on IP Rights and BHR Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization

Regular HR Situationer For CHR: Reporting to • Per Tribe • Protection (Case Monitoring, Investigation – New or Follow Up) • Per These/Issues International • Per Area • Promotion (IEC) H.R. • Per Sector • Policy • CHR OD Mechanisms • Comms Plan • KM System National Inquiry IP HUMAN IPRO • •BASELINE/ Public Hearing RIGHTS CONCEPT •Consultation WS DATABASE SITUATIONER •IP Rights M&E PAPER REPORT Indicators & Tools • Operative (Analysis Utilizing Elements IPRO State Duty Bearers: O.PE.R.A.) (Supporting O.PE.R.A. Operationalization • Mandates, PPAs Utilization) • Issues • Responses to Other State Duty Bearers: • Mechanisms • Tools Issues Raised • CHR Letters to agencies per • Policies • Monitoring • Resources Mechanisms • Issue/ area • Per program • Systems IPRO Proposals • TWG/ Inter Agency for thematic/recurring issues • Operative Elements • Policy Advisories • Commitments of Support Towards an IPHRO - Operationalization

Next Steps for the IPHRO

1. Organizational Development (O.D.) for the IPHRO in CHR 2. Capacity Building for the IPHRO in CHR 3. Strategic Communications for the IPHRO in CHR 4. Knowledge Management System for the IPHRO in CHR