CLF NEWS Edition 17 19/07/18 “Empowering Learning”
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey
England LEA/School Code School Name Town 330/6092 Abbey College Birmingham 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 865/4000 Abbeyfield School Chippenham 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton-on-Trent 312/5409 Abbotsfield School Uxbridge 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 825/6015 Akeley Wood Senior School Buckingham 935/4059 Alde Valley School Leiston 919/6003 Aldenham School Borehamwood 891/4117 Alderman White School and Language College Nottingham 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 845/4003 ARK William Parker Academy Hastings 371/4021 Armthorpe Academy Doncaster 885/4008 Arrow Vale RSA Academy Redditch 937/5401 Ash Green School Coventry 371/4000 Ash Hill Academy Doncaster 891/4009 Ashfield Comprehensive School Nottingham 801/4030 Ashton -
A Review and Evaluation of Secondary School Accountability in England: Statistical Strengths, Weaknesses, and Challenges for ‘Progress 8’ Raised by COVID-19
Social Research Institute A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for ‘Progress 8’ raised by COVID-19 Lucy Prior John Jerrim Dave Thomson George Leckie Quantitative Social Science Working Paper No. 21-12 April 2021 Disclaimer Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the UCL Social Research Institute. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. QSS Workings Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Quantitative Social Science UCL Social Research Institute University College London 55-59 Gordon Square London WC1H 0NU 2 Social Research Institute A review and evaluation of secondary school accountability in England: Statistical strengths, weaknesses, and challenges for ‘Progress 8’ raised by COVID-19 Lucy Prior1 John Jerrim2 Dave Thomson3 4 George Leckie Abstract School performance measures are published annually in England to hold schools to account and to support parental school choice. This article reviews and evaluates the ‘Progress 8’ secondary school accountability system for state-funded schools. We assess the statistical strengths and weaknesses of Progress 8 relating to: choice of pupil outcome attainment measure; potential adjustments for pupil input attainment and background characteristics; decisions around which schools and pupils are excluded from the measure; presentation of Progress 8 to users, choice of statistical model, and calculation of statistical uncertainty; and issues related to the volatility of school performance over time, including scope for reporting multi-year averages. -
Ashton Park School
Ashton Park School Open Sessions Evening Thursday 22 September 2016, 6pm to 8.30pm (Headteacher’s talk 8pm) Headteacher Mr Nick John Day Monday 26 September 2016, 11.15am to 12.30pm Address Blackmoor’s Lane, Bower Ashton, Tuesday 27 September 2016, Bristol BS3 2JL 11.15am to 12.30pm t 0117 377 2777 f 0117 377 2778 e [email protected] www.ashtonpark.co.uk creates a genuine platform for every student to excel whether in Art, Drama, Music or Sport Status Foundation School to name but a few. Students are given many Age range 11–18 opportunities to travel abroad to further enrich Specialism Sports College their learning and achievements. Our links with a school in Kenya provides a particularly unique Our school is set in the beautiful surroundings and profound experience for which we have of Ashton Court Estate, providing a rich learning been awarded the prestigious International resource and outstanding location for our Schools Award. Our House System is designed students’ education. In February 2015 Ofsted to celebrate every student’s success and reward reported: The headteacher supported by leaders, them in a number of ways. We believe in listening governors, staff and students has acted with to and empowering students whilst seeking out determination to secure improvements in avenues of developing their leadership qualities. teaching and students’ achievement. The school’s We provide opportunities for them to take on capacity to improve further is strong. In April increasing responsibilities as they get older. We 2010 we became a Foundation School to allow us have developed a culture of excellence so as to create even closer links with our community students and staff we are constantly striving to to ensure our ethos and values reflect their needs improve together and contribute positively to our and desires. -
Downloading Information
BRISTOL + BATH x DESIGN BRISTOL + BATH x DESIGN: FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Final Report November 2016 Challenge: To understand the economic and cultural value of design in the Bristol and Bath region. CHALLENGE: TO UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL VALUE OF DESIGN IN THE BRISTOL AND BATH REGION BRISTOL + BATH x DESIGN: FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 8 Why is this Important? 10 Why Bristol and Bath? 12 Research Design and Methods 16 History Matters 20 Measuring the Value of Design 44 Findings 52 Mapping the Territory 52 The Designers 58 The Designers’ Voice 66 The Design Business 88 How do Designers and Design Businesses Work? 98 What is Important to Designers and Design Businesses? 120 What Could be Done to Enhance the Design Industry in the Region? 128 The Bristol and Bath Ecosystem 138 Conclusion 152 Outcomes of the Project 160 Recommendations 164 Case Studies of Partners 170 Bibliography 174 Appendix 176 Credits 180 CHALLENGE: TO UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL VALUE OF DESIGN IN THE BRISTOL AND BATH REGION BRISTOL + BATH x DESIGN: FINAL REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Executive Summary The aim of the project was to collect data on design Why we were selected companies in the Bristol and Bath region, and to gain a better understanding of the economic and cultural value The AHRC and the Design Council have been working of the design-led sector. To do this, our primary research together over the last four years to understand was to develop a range of qualitative and quantitative how design plays a key role in creating economic methods that could gather and then analyse the data. -
'School Place Planning and School Admissions in Bristol'
Scrutiny Councillor workshop – Information Pack Bristol City Council Overview and Scrutiny – Councillor Workshop ‘School Place Planning and School Admissions in Bristol’ Date: Monday 19th December Venue: The Writing Room, City Hall Time: 1 – 4pm Information pack Thank you for accepting the invitation to participate in the Councillor Workshop. The Workshop has been arranged to provide Councillors with an in depth understanding of school admissions in Bristol. A variety of documents have been collated to assist you in preparation for the session. You are recommended to familiarise yourself with this before the workshop as time will be limited on the day. What information has been provided and why? In order to understand the challenges facing Bristol, Councillors need to understand how and why decisions are made in relation to School Place Planning and School Admissions. A substantial amount of background information has been provided (either as an attachment or a web link has been provided) and there will also be an opportunity to ask questions at the Workshop. Title What information does this provide? 1. The Integrated Education and The document outlines a number of strategic aims and Capital Strategy (2015 – 2019) objectives to improve the number of places, the distribution of facilities and the condition and suitability of the estate. 2. A guide for parents and carers The booklet provides information to assist parents and carers applying for primary schools make decisions and to guide them to sources of further for the school year 2017-2018 information. 3. Education outside schools – Web link – click here to view What is alternative learning provision 4. -
Cabot Learning Federation Teaching School Alliance
Cabot Learning Federation Cabot Learning Federation Teaching School Alliance @CLF Institute 2016 Growth Haywood Village Academy City Academy Bristol Hans Price Academy Digitech Studio School Bristol Wallscourt Farm Academy John Cabot Academy Hanham Woods Academy Frome Vale Academy Bath Community Academy Begbrook Primary Academy Summerhill Academy King’s Oak Academy Bristol Brunel Academy Minerva Primary Academy CLF Post 16 Bristol Metropolitan Academy 2016 Cabot Learning Federation Cabot Learning Federation • 1548 staff (690 teachers) • 7958 pupils • 1711 in 3-11 (21%) • 5722 in 11-16 (72%) • 525 in Post 16 (7%) 2016 Cabot Learning Federation Academies September 2016 WFA SA MPA FVA BPA HVA Nest Engage KOA BCA HPA BBA BMA JCA CAB HWA DSSB EYFS X X X X X X KS1 X X X X X X X KS2 X X X X X X KS3 X X X X X X X X X Key Stages Key KS4 X X X X X X X X X X P16 X X X X X X X Key Mainstream Primary Alternative Provision All-through Academy 11-16 Academy 11-18 Academy Studio School Leadership Team Vision & Values CLF Institute CLF Teaching School Alliance Partners CLF Academies: Named partners in Teaching School Alliance: Bath Community Academy The Castle School Bridge Learning Campus Bristol Brunel Academy Andalusia Academy Orchard School Bristol Bristol Metropolitan Academy John of Gaunt School Priory Community School City Academy Bristol St Brendan’s Sixth Form College Wellsway School and MAT Digitech Studio School Ashley Down Primary Bristol Grammar School Hanham Woods Academy Fishponds Primary Academy Bristol Cathedral Choir School Hans Price -
Wave 1 Impact Assessments
Title: Bristol Free School Author: Department for Education (DfE) Annex C: Section 9 Academies Act 2010 impact assessment Executive Summary This paper considers the potential implications of opening a new Free School in North Bristol for the local schools system. Key messages are: The proposed new school addresses a current mismatch between demand and supply There is clear parental demand for a new state secondary school whilst at the same time there is surplus capacity in existing schools. This suggests that some parents do not want what these schools (which have relatively low GCSE performance) are offering. So the system is clearly not working for some parents – it is allocatively inefficient, in economic terms, as the right mix of education is not being provided to meet demand. Impact of the new school on existing schools will depend on where it takes its pupils from Analysis of individual schools suggests three tentative conclusions. First, the greater it’s intake from the independent sector, the lower the impact on existing state schools (but the higher the deadweight costs). Second, over-subscribed schools will see minimal impact as they will continue to fill their places regardless. Third, the biggest impact may be on under- subscribed poorly-performing schools which lose pupils (and potentially non-FSM pupils). Risk to performance and short term viability of some schools if they lose too many pupils If some under-subscribed poorly-performing schools lose too many pupils, through direct or indirect effects, their performance may be affected (depending on which types of pupils they lose). Losing too many pupils may affect their viability, but risks to longer term viability could be mitigated by the projected rise in demand for overall places in the area. -
Steiner Academy Bristol
STEINER ACADEMY BRISTOL Free Schools in 2014 Application form Mainstream and 16-19 Free Schools Application checklist Checklist: Sections A-H of your application Yes No 1. You have established a company limited by guarantee. 2. You have provided information on all of the following areas: Section A: Applicant details – including signed declaration Section B: Outline of the school Section C: Education vision Section D: Education plan Section E: Evidence of demand Section F: Capacity and capability Section G: Initial costs and financial viability Section H: Premises 3. This information is provided in A4 format using Arial font, minimum 12 font size, includes page numbers and is no more than 150 pages in total. 4. You have completed two financial plans using the financial template spreadsheet. 5. Independent schools only: you have provided a link to the most recent inspection report. 6. Independent schools only: you have provided a copy of the last two years’ audited financial statements or equivalent. 7. All relevant information relating to Sections A-H of your application has been emailed to [email protected] between 9am on 17 December 2012 and 6pm on 4 January 2013 and the email is no more than 10 MB in size. 8. Two hard copies of the application have been sent by ‘Recorded Signed For’ post to: Free Schools Applications Team, Department for Education, 3rd Floor, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BT. Checklist: Section I of your application 9. A copy of Section A of the form and as many copies of the Section I Personal Information form as there are members and directors have been sent by ‘Recorded Signed For’ post to: Due Diligence Team, Department for Education, 4th Floor, Sanctuary Buildings, Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BT, between 9am on 17 December 2012 and 6pm on 4 January 2013. -
Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle
Contextual Data Education Indicators: 2022 Cycle Schools are listed in alphabetical order. You can use CTRL + F/ Level 2: GCSE or equivalent level qualifications Command + F to search for Level 3: A Level or equivalent level qualifications your school or college. Notes: 1. The education indicators are based on a combination of three years' of school performance data, where available, and combined using z-score methodology. For further information on this please follow the link below. 2. 'Yes' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, meets the criteria for an education indicator. 3. 'No' in the Level 2 or Level 3 column means that a candidate from this school, studying at this level, does not meet the criteria for an education indicator. 4. 'N/A' indicates that there is no reliable data available for this school for this particular level of study. All independent schools are also flagged as N/A due to the lack of reliable data available. 5. Contextual data is only applicable for schools in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland meaning only schools from these countries will appear in this list. If your school does not appear please contact [email protected]. For full information on contextual data and how it is used please refer to our website www.manchester.ac.uk/contextualdata or contact [email protected]. Level 2 Education Level 3 Education School Name Address 1 Address 2 Post Code Indicator Indicator 16-19 Abingdon Wootton Road Abingdon-on-Thames -
Bristol 1927-1933 by John Lyes
Moo o 8Z.Str-t-c-J AN 2715119 0 THE BRISTOL BRANCH'OF THE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL. HISTORY PAMPHLETS IIIIII IIIIIII I IIII II II I IllI 111111111111111 BRISTOL Hon. General-Editor: PETER HARRIS 1927-1933 Assistant GenflralEditor: NORMA KNIGHT Editorial Advisor: JOSEPH BETTEY Life in Bristol at the end of the 1920s and in the early years of the 1930s was to some extent overshadowed by the problems of the unemployed who resented being subject to the means test and having to perform 'test' work Bristol 1927�1933 is the one hundred and eleventh pamphlet in this series. in order to secure relief. There were ugly scenes in the streets as they gave John Lyes is the author of 'A Strong Smell of Brimstone': The Attorneys voice to their protests. In 1930 the responsibility foradministering relief was and Solicitors of Bristol 1740-1840, Bristol 1901-1913, Bristol 1914-1919 transferred from the Guardians to the City Council. Even many of those in and Bristol 1920-1926 (nos. 98, 104, 107 and 109 in this series). work suffered pay cuts. In the Council chamber Labour councillors The publication of a pamphlet by the Bristol Branch of the Historical increasingly challenged the authority of the Citizen ruling party; they were Association does not necessadly imply the Branch's approval of the particularly concerned that the method of appointing aldermen deprived opinions expressed in it. them of the scale of representation that they felt they deserved. The Historical Association is a national body which seeks to encourage During this period the face of the city was changing as a result of interest in all forms of history. -
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Mckeon, Theresa A Title: Public Services, Private Values The Society of the Merchant Venturers of Bristol and the Changing World of Welfare Service Provision in England, 1975-2017 General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Public Services, Private Values: The Society -
The Integrated Education & Capital Strategy
The Integrated Education & Capital Strategy (2015-2019) Published September 2015 Revised January 2016 Integrated Education and Capital Strategy 2015 Contents FOREWORD: George Ferguson – Mayor of Bristol 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CITY CONTEXT and VISION 4 Unique and Prosperous 4 Building Successful Places 4 Keep Bristol Working and Learning 4 Employment and Skills 5 Responding to Needs 5 Developing a New Estate Strategy 5 ESTABLISHING STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 6 Engaging Stakeholders 6 Governance 6 Core principles 6 Strategic Objectives 7 Strategic Aims 7 INTEGRATED WORKING 8 A Blueprint for Quality 8 Neighbourhood Model 9 High Quality Environments 9 Highly Skilled and Knowledgeable Workforce 10 Inclusion and Equality of Access 10 Housing 10 Partnership Opportunities (Libraries Review; NHS 10 and Public Sector; Private Sector and Business Community) SECTOR-SPECIFIC PLANS 11 Send And Alp 11 Early Years 15 Primary 19 Secondary 22 Post-16 27 Adult Skills And Learning 30 OTHER CROSS-SECTOR PRIORITIES 33 Community Use, Sport and Leisure 33 Sustainability in Schools 34 Keep Bristol Moving 35 SUMMARY AND NEXT STEPS 35 Summary and Next Steps 35 Developing a Business Case 36 2 Integrated Education and Capital Strategy 2015 FOREWORD George Ferguson – Mayor of Bristol I am delighted to see the development of this partnership integrated education and capital strategy. As an architect I am particularly pleased to see that it brings a much needed and renewed focus on the built environment, to ensure that all those engaged in education and learning benefit from high quality buildings and facilities. It is the culmination of significant partnership endeavour and my thanks go to all involved in bringing it to fruition.