Conservation in a Highly Fragmented Landscape: the Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Conservation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservation in a Highly Fragmented Landscape: the Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Conservation Plan Conservation in a Highly Fragmented Landscape: The Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Conservation Plan January 2000 Prepared by: The Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregion Planning Team Table of Contents Conservation in a Highly Fragmented Landscape: .................................................2 1. The Place and Its People.....................................................................................2 1.1 Overview of the Ecoregion..........................................................................................................2 1.1.1 Grand Prairies .....................................................................................................................3 1.1.2 Great Rivers........................................................................................................................3 1.1.3 Amber Waves of Grain.........................................................................................................4 1.2 Human Context..........................................................................................................................6 2. Building a Foundation for Conservation Design .................................................7 2.1 Planning Teams.........................................................................................................................7 2.2 Planning Process.......................................................................................................................7 2.3 Planning Data and Guidelines.....................................................................................................8 2.3.1 Conservation Targets...........................................................................................................8 2.3.2 Viability Guidelines...............................................................................................................9 2.3.3 Conservation Goals............................................................................................................10 2.4 Site Selection ..........................................................................................................................11 3. Designing an Ecoregional Plan at Multiple Geographic Scales.........................12 3.1 A Brief History of Ecoregional Planning and Concepts of Geographic Scale.................................12 3.2 The Concept of Functional Systems..........................................................................................13 3.3.1 Functional Sites .................................................................................................................15 3.3.2 Functional Landscapes.......................................................................................................15 3.3.3 Functional Networks...........................................................................................................15 4. Central Tallgrass Prairie Conservation Design .................................................16 4.1 Evaluating the Design ..............................................................................................................16 4.1.1 Imperiled Communities.......................................................................................................16 4.1.2 Threats Assessment ..........................................................................................................20 4.1.3 Biodiversity Rating.............................................................................................................21 4.1.4 Managed Areas Status.......................................................................................................23 4.2 Identifying Priorities..................................................................................................................24 5. From Planning to Practice.................................................................................29 5.1 Implementation Strategies ........................................................................................................29 5.1.1 Multi-site Threat Abatement Strategies................................................................................29 5.1.2 Overall Implementation Strategies.......................................................................................29 5.2 Restoration as a Key Strategy for Conservation in the CTP Ecoregion.........................................30 5.2.1 Identifying Restoration Sites ...............................................................................................30 5.2.2 The Contribution of Landscape Restoration Sites to the Central Tallgrass Prairie Plan ...........31 5.2.3 Establishing Ecoregional Priorities for Conservation .............................................................31 5.3 Communication Plan................................................................................................................34 5.3.1 General recommendations for all of the communication tools................................................34 5.3.2 Communicating with the Internal Audience ..........................................................................34 5.3.3 Communicating with the External Audience.........................................................................34 5.4 On-going Maintenance.............................................................................................................35 5.4.1 Site Selection Advisory Team.............................................................................................35 5.4.2 Assessment and Design Team meeting timeframe and purpose............................................35 5.5 Second Iteration of the Plan......................................................................................................35 5.6 Data Gaps...............................................................................................................................35 5.7 Lessons Learned.....................................................................................................................36 5.7.1 Process Lessons ...............................................................................................................36 5.7.2 Design Lessons .................................................................................................................37 5.7.3 Assessment Lessons .........................................................................................................36 6. Acknowledgements...........................................................................................38 Appendices...........................................................................................................39 Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Conservation Plan, page 1/39 Conservation in a Highly Fragmented Landscape: The Central Tallgrass Prairie Ecoregional Conservation Plan With the adoption of Conservation by Design in 1995, The Nature Conservancy recognized the importance of working at larger scales to achieve our mission which is: the long-term survival of all viable native species and community types through the design and conservation of portfolios of sites within ecoregions. The Conservancy set forth to design conservation plans on an ecoregional basis by working closely with various conservation partners. These plans are intended to provide a framework within which the Conservancy and our partners, such as the Natural Heritage Programs, can make decisions regarding conservation actions to be taken at the local level, confident in the knowledge that site by site activities in ecoregions are not isolated but part of a larger, coherent design. The highly fragmented nature of the Central Tallgrass Prairie (CTP) Ecoregion presented certain challenges for the Planning Team. How do Definitions you meet a goal of providing for the long-term viability of all native Ecoregion: a relatively large unit species and communities when large-scale natural landscapes account of land and water defined by the for such a small percentage of the region? How does The Nature influences of shared climate Conservancy achieve mission success in an area where the remaining and geology, the main factors natural areas are often isolated from one another by miles of agricultural determining the distribution of fields and are typically degraded by the threats imposed on them through plants and animals in the area. fragmentation and detrimental land use practices? Portfolio: the suite of sites within an ecoregion that would One of the clear messages the planning team would like the reader to collectively conserve the native walk away with is that the conservation situation in the Central Tallgrass species and community types Prairie Ecoregion is desperate. The vast majority of the landscape has found in that ecoregion. been converted to agricultural uses. Less than 5% of the ecoregion is Viability: the ability of a species considered “untilled” or “intact” from an ecological perspective. Few or community to persist over areas remain that retain some vestige of the natural communities that time. once dominated the landscape, and these remnants are typically under Natural Heritage Program/ great stress either from adjacent incompatible land uses, invasive Conservation Data Centers: species, fire suppression, hydrologic alterations, or other threats. We State, regional, and/or national cannot afford to lose any more of our natural heritage, and, in fact, there programs that develop and is a great need to restore some of the most
Recommended publications
  • Natural Areas Management Plan
    ALLERTON PARK & RETREAT CENTER: NATURAL AREAS MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared: December, 1992 Robert E. Szafoni1, Francis M. Harty2 Revised: January, 2012 John D. Griesbaum3 1Illinois Department of Natural Resources Division of Natural Heritage 2The Nature Conservancy 3University of Illinois - Allerton Park & Retreat Center CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 ...................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 PRESETTLEMENT CONDITIONS OF ALLERTON PARK .................... 1 CURRENT STATUS OF SIGNIFICANT RESOURCES ....................... 2 ECOLOGICAL THREATS TO NATURAL AREAS .......................... 5 1. Exotic Species ................................................ 5 2. Altered Successional Patterns ...................................... 5 3. Other Disturbances ............................................. 6 AMOUNT OF CURRENT/POTENTIAL VISITOR USAGE ..................... 6 OVERALL MANAGEMENT GOALS ................................... 7 OVERALL MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ........................ 7 A. Prescribed Burning ............................................. 7 B. Exotic Species Control .......................................... 8 C. Control of Undesirable Woody Vegetation ............................. 9 D. Enhance Diversity of Prairie Reconstruction ............................ 9 E. Survey & Monitoring of Species of Management Concern ................... 9 F. White-Tail Deer Control ........................................ 10 VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • UMR Spill Response Plan and Resource Manual
    Upper Mississippi River Spill Response Plan and Resource Manual Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Iowa Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Missouri Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources U.S. Coast Guard U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coordinated By: Upper Mississippi River Basin Association NOVEMBER 1997 (Updated July 1998) (Updated December 2001) (Updated January 2003) (Updated February 2004) (Updated AUGUST 2006) Restricted Distribution Version DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTED SPECIAL NOTICE This is the Restricted Distribution Version of the Upper Mississippi River Spill Response Plan and Resource Manual. Due to security concerns, distribution is limited to public and private sector personnel responsible for hazardous spills planning and response on the Upper Mississippi River. A public access version of the document, which includes the entire Response Plan but omits certain portions of the Resource Manual, is available for unrestricted distribution at www.umrba.org/hazspills/umrplan.pdf. Questions should be directed to the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association at 651-224-2880 or [email protected]. August 2006 PREAMBLE Preparation and maintenance of the Upper Mississippi River Spill Response Plan and Resource Manual, originally published in 1991, is a collaborative effort among five states and four federal agencies under the auspices of the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association. The plan is not intended to supplant any other local, state, regional, or national response or contingency plans that may be in effect. Rather, it was designed to address some of the unique circumstances that may arise in coordinating spill response on the Mississippi River.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Handbook
    II UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAiQN BOOKSTACKS Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 http://archive.org/details/facultyhandbookOOuniv Handbook RSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN LIBRARY £ This publication has been prepared by the Office of the Chancellor and the University Office of Public Information for faculty members at the Urbana-Champaign campus of the Uni- versity of Illinois. Copies may be obtained from the Chancellor's Office, 112 English Build- ing. Information contained herein is applicable to policies and statistics effective for the 1969-70 academic year, subject to change through action of the Board of Trustees. Faculty Handbook UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 1969-70 c. Contents FROM THE PRESIDENT 4 FROM THE CHANCELLOR 7 THE ROLE AND GOALS OF THE UNIVERSITY 9 THE CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SETTING 11 LEGAL INFORMATION 14 ORGANIZATION AND GOVERNMENT 17 EMPLOYMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 38 INSTRUCTIONAL INFORMATION 49 CULTURAL, SOCIAL, AND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES 56 GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 63 FACILITIES AND SERVICES 76 INDEX 99 From the President The Faculty Handbook is designed to help individual faculty members, particularly new ones, understand the organization of the University and some of the procedures and practices that govern its institutional life. In more than a century the University of Illinois has grown from small but dedicated beginnings to a large and renowned center of learning, respected around the world. Through these years traditions have been formed that remain influential in the conduct of University affairs. The University belongs to the people of Illinois. Its governing board is elected by the citizens and approximately 53 per cent of its operating funds come from appropriation of tax funds by the General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Biodiversity Recovery in a Large-Scale Ecosystem Restoration
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 1(2):101-108 Submitted: 10 May 2006; Accepted: 12 November 2006 AMPHIBIAN BIODIVERSITY RECOVERY IN A LARGE-SCALE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION 1,2 1 1 3 ROBERT BRODMAN , MICHAEL PARRISH , HEIDI KRAUS AND SPENCER CORTWRIGHT 1Biology Department, Saint Joseph’s College, Rensselaer, Indiana, 47978, USA 2Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 3Biology Department, Indiana University Northwest, Gary, Indiana, 46408 USA. Abstract.—Amphibians are important components of ecosystem function and processes; however, many populations have declined due to habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation. We studied the effect of wetlands ecosystem restoration on amphibian population recovery at Kankakee Sands in northwest Indiana, USA. We also tested predictions about colonization in relation to proximity to existing nature preserves and species characteristics. Prior to restoration activities (1998), the amphibian community at Kankakee Sands consisted of fourteen populations of seven species at seven breeding sites. By 2001, this community increased to 60 populations at 26 sites; however, species richness had not increased. By 2002 the community increased to 143 populations of eight species at 38 sites, and by 2003 there were 172 populations of ten species at 44 sites. Abundance index values increased 15-fold from 1998-2003. These increases best fit the exponential growth model. Although survival through metamorphosis was substantial during wetter than average years (2002 and 2003), during other years restored wetlands dried before larvae of most species transformed. Amphibian colonization was greatest near a nature preserve with the greatest amphibian diversity. The earliest colonists included fossorial species and those species whose habitat includes wet and mesic sand prairie.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557
    Volume 34,Issue 19 May 7, 2010 Pages 6270-6557 i TABLE OF CONTENTS May 7, 2010 Volume 34, Issue 19 PROPOSED RULES NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 550....................................................................6270 Muskrat, Mink, Raccoon, Opossum, Striped Skunk, Weasel, Red Fox, Gray Fox, Coyote, Badger, Beaver and Woodchuck (Groundhog) Trapping 17 Ill. Adm. Code 570....................................................................6282 Dove Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 730....................................................................6293 Crow, Woodcock, Snipe, Rail and Teal Hunting 17 Ill. Adm. Code 740....................................................................6310 Crossbow and Standing Vehicle Hunting Authorizations 17 Ill. Adm. Code 760....................................................................6324 Illinois List of Endangered and Threatened Fauna 17 Ill. Adm. Code 1010..................................................................6328 REVENUE, DEPARTMENT OF Income Tax 86 Ill. Adm. Code 100....................................................................6339 ADOPTED RULES CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF Reports of Child Abuse and Neglect 89 Ill. Adm. Code 300....................................................................6373 NATURAL RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF Sport Fishing Regulations for the Waters of Illinois 17 Ill. Adm. Code 810....................................................................6391
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems 35
    Chapter 4—Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems 35 CHAPTER 4 Vegetation Ecology and Change in Terrestrial Ecosystems John B. Taft1, Roger C. Anderson2, and Louis R. Iverson3 with sidebar by William C. Handel1 1. Illinois Natural History Survey 2. Department of Biology, Illinois State University 3. USDA Forest Service OBJECTIVES What are the major vegetation types that have occurred in Illinois and how have they changed since the last ice age and more specifically since European-Americans settled the region? Ecological factors influencing trends, composition, and diversity in prairie, savanna, open woodland, and forest communities are examined. Historical and contemporary changes will be explored with reference to the proportion and characteristics of habitats remaining in a relatively undegraded condition. While Illinois is a focus for this chapter, the processes and factors explaining vegetational variation have relevance to the entire Midwest and in many cases beyond. INTRODUCTION key step in conserving biodiversity. The following chapter explores the dominant types of native terrestrial vegetation Vegetation change is a major focus of ecological monitoring and changes as they have occurred in Illinois primarily since and research and has both temporal and spatial aspects. Of Pleistocene glaciation with a focus on the post-European course, all change is measured through time. Change can settlement period. be evaluated on a time scale of thousands of years, such as following Pleistocene glaciation, or in the time frame of an In thE FOrMEr tIME annual species. An example of a spatial aspect of vegetation The last glacial episode, known as Wisconsinan glaciation, change is the emergence of forest where once prairie covered the northeastern quarter of Illinois from about occurred (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14
    MeadowlarkSUMMER/FALL 2017 Prairie Falcons of Coles County, Illinois 14 2017 IORC Report 7 Summer 2017 Fall 2017 Field Notes 21 Field Notes 46 Meadowlark PRESIDENT’S LETTER PUBLISHED BY Illinois Ornithological Society Anyone who has done a bit of bird watching on the western shore of Lake Michigan during fall migration knows that your success is very often weather EDITORIAL TEAM dependent. In fact, the best weather days (think sunny and calm) aren’t necessarily the best birding days at all. Warm sunny weather entices more people outside CHIEF EDITOR often with their kids and pets in tow. Better get up early or you’ll hear stories Eric Secker from fellow birders how dogs chased off a flock of graceful American Avocets from ASSISTANT EDITORS the beach or runners flushed an unexpected Upland Sandpiper moments before Tamima Itani, Adam Sell you arrived. There’s nothing more frustrating than missing a good bird by a few PRESIDENT & CHIEF SUPERVISOR minutes. Believe me. I’ve been there many times. Matt Igleski Experienced birders don’t mind getting up early or even braving the elements, LAYOUT AND PRODUCTION but it’s not just about trying to beat the crowd. Knowing how the weather may Eric Secker affect migration and bird activity improves your chances at finding certain species or of having a productive outing in general. FIELD NOTES EDITORS There’s probably one condition where you might as well pack it in for the Jill Anderson Matt Hayes day and that’s heavy rain. In a torrential downpour, you won’t be able to see or Dan Williams even keep your optics dry.
    [Show full text]
  • 62Nd Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference October 4–6, 2018 No T R E Dame Conference Center Mc Kenna Hall
    62nd Annual Midwest Archaeological Conference October 4–6, 2018 No t r e Dame Conference Center Mc Kenna Hall Parking ndsp.nd.edu/ parking- and- trafǢc/visitor-guest-parking Visitor parking is available at the following locations: • Morris Inn (valet parking for $10 per day for guests of the hotel, rest aurants, and conference participants. Conference attendees should tell t he valet they are here for t he conference.) • Visitor Lot (paid parking) • Joyce & Compt on Lot s (paid parking) During regular business hours (Monday–Friday, 7a.m.–4p.m.), visitors using paid parking must purchase a permit at a pay st at ion (red arrows on map, credit cards only). The permit must be displayed face up on the driver’s side of the vehicle’s dashboard, so it is visible to parking enforcement staff. Parking is free after working hours and on weekends. Rates range from free (less than 1 hour) to $8 (4 hours or more). Campus Shut t les 2 3 Mc Kenna Hal l Fl oor Pl an Registration Open House Mai n Level Mc Kenna Hall Lobby and Recept ion Thursday, 12 a.m.–5 p.m. Department of Anthropology Friday, 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Saturday, 8 a.m.–1 p.m. 2nd Floor of Corbett Family Hall Informat ion about the campus and its Thursday, 6–8 p.m. amenities is available from any of t he Corbett Family Hall is on the east side of personnel at the desk. Notre Dame Stadium. The second floor houses t he Department of Anthropology, including facilities for archaeology, Book and Vendor Room archaeometry, human osteology, and Mc Kenna Hall 112–114 bioanthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Lasalle Fish & Wildlife Area's Hardwood Forests, Fields And
    LaSalle Fish & Wildlife Area’s hardwood forests, fields and marshes were once part of Grand Kankakee Marsh. 20 July/August 2017 EVERGLADES MINUS THE GATORS Telling the Grand Kankakee Marsh story helps restore it OutdoorIndiana.org 21 Quis eos voloreperion ped quam qui te eumenis am cone officidebis mos estis volut officitata imusdae vernatem quam, (Top, bottom) Eastern prickly pear (Opuntia humifusa), a cactus found at Kankakee Sands, is attractive, useful and edible; it also serves as food and cover for wildlife. Black-eyed Susan and tall grasses flourish at Kankakee Sands, which was once part of Grand Kankakee Marsh; the area packs a vast array of plants and wildlife in its more than 7,000 acres. 22 July/August 2017 By Nick Werner, OI staff To this day, many do not know of the marsh, let alone its Photography by Frank Oliver importance. Even some of the re-enactors who attend Aukiki are unaware, Hodson said. But a century later, the Kankakee’s story is rising from the ground like a ghost in a cemetery, searching for answers about fter the downpour ceased, four its demise. The spirit of the marsh has benefited from cold- women in bonnets and long case conservationists like Hodson. Archaeologists, farmers, dresses sang frontier-era folk hunters and even filmmakers have also played a role. Togeth- er, they are re-examining the region’s history, hoping to cor- songs in French. rect past mistakes. Their methods include creation of public Do they know? John Hodson wondered. A awareness, as well as land preservation, wetland restoration Probably not, he decided.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreational Needs & the Hunter Lake Opportunity Illinois
    Outdoor Recreational Needs & The Hunter Lake Opportunity Illinois Department of Natural Resources December 3, 2018 Introduction In 2015, the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) entered into agreement with the City of Springfield to manage city-owned property surrounding the City’s proposed secondary water supply (Hunter Lake). The City has already acquired 7,138 acres for the project located in southeastern Sangamon County. The lake is expected to cover 2,560 surface-acres with water. Outdoors recreation generates about $32 billion in economic activity each year for the State of Illinois, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. All this activity supports 90,000 jobs statewide. As the population of the United States continues its gradual migration from rural to urban areas (U.S. Census Bureau), demand for recreational land, open space and hunting and fishing opportunities will continue to grow. With 95 percent of Illinois land in private hands, the state ranks 46th in terms of land in public ownership. The IDNR owns and manages about 480,000 acres. The partnership between the City and IDNR is intended to provide additional public access for outdoor recreation, education and habitat conservation on Hunter Lake and its surrounding area. The City concluded the IDNR is the appropriate state agency to help the City achieve this objective. IDNR has statutory authority to manage the state’s fish and wildlife resources. To this end, the City chose to enter a Memorandum of Cooperation with IDNR (Appendix A) and tasked the Agency with managing the property’s outdoors potential for recreational opportunity, including hunting, fishing, bird-watching, biking, hiking and camping.
    [Show full text]
  • DATA by CLASSIFICATION Page Land & Water Acreage Leased
    State of Illinois Illinois Department of Natural Resources Land and Water Report Report Cover Table of Contents Land & Water Leased Water DATA BY CLASSIFICATION Page Acreage Acreage Acreage* Pictured on the cover is Wise Ridge Bedrock Hill State Natural Area. Located in the State Parks 4 127,793.172 9,911.280 10,481.640 Shawnee Hills in Johnson County, this property is listed in the Illinois Natural Area Inventory for its high quality forest and limestone glades. More than a mile of the Conservation Areas 10 73,275.608 0.000 20,402.326 Tunnel Hill State Trail runs through this tract providing good public access. Fish Facilities 12 232.650 32.500 60.100 Natural Areas 13 44,631.941 0.000 3,869.200 Acquisition of this 555.845+/- acre tract allows IDNR to preserve a scenic, forested Fish and Wildlife Areas 26 94,542.623 73,384.180 8,627.290 corridor along the Tunnel Hill Trail consistent with statewide conservation and natural State Wildlife Areas 30 1,356.193 700.000 0.000 resource plans. Wise Ridge is in the Eastern Shawnee Conservation Opportunity Area Greenways and Trails 30 1,560.342 0.000 0.000 of Illinois Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan. The property is a mixture of State Memorials 31 0.100 0.000 0.000 steep, forested slopes, limestone barrens and a bottomland bordering Pond Creek, a Boating Access Areas 31 6.300 304.300 0.000 tributary of the South Fork of the Saline River. Expanded public recreational State Recreation Areas 31 3,955.015 9,300.000 16.800 opportunities will include hunting, wildlife observation and hiking trails.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Minutes of the 206
    Illinois Nature Preserves Commission Minutes of the 206th Meeting (Approved at the 207th Meeting) Burpee Museum of Natural History 737 North Main Street Rockford, IL 61103 Tuesday, September 21, 2010 206-1) Call to Order, Roll Call, and Introduction of Attendees At 10:05 a.m., pursuant to the Call to Order of Chair Riddell, the meeting began. Deborah Stone read the roll call. Members present: George Covington, Donnie Dann, Ronald Flemal, Richard Keating, William McClain, Jill Riddell, and Lauren Rosenthal. Members absent: Mare Payne and David Thomas. Chair Riddell stated that the Governor has appointed the following Commissioners: George M. Covington (replacing Harry Drucker), Donald (Donnie) R. Dann (replacing Bruce Ross- Shannon), William E. McClain (replacing Jill Allread), and Dr. David L. Thomas (replacing John Schwegman). It was moved by Rosenthal, seconded by Flemal, and carried that the following resolution be approved: The Illinois Nature Preserves Commission wishes to recognize the contributions of Jill Allread during her tenure as a Commissioner from 2000 to 2010. Jill served with distinction as Chair of the Commission from 2002 to 2004. She will be remembered for her clear sense of direction, her problem solving abilities, and her leadership in taking the Commission’s message to the broader public. Her years of service with the Commission and her continuing commitment to and advocacy for the Commission will always be greatly appreciated. (Resolution 2089) It was moved by Rosenthal, seconded by Flemal, and carried that the following resolution be approved: The Illinois Nature Preserves Commission wishes to recognize the contributions of Harry Drucker during his tenure as a Commissioner from 2001 to 2010.
    [Show full text]