DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2105.05208V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 18 May 2021 II.2.3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2105.05208V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 18 May 2021 II.2.3 Challenges for ΛCDM : An update L. Perivolaropoulos1, ∗ and F. Skara1, y 1Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece (Dated: May 20, 2021) A number of challenges of the standard ΛCDM model has been emerging during the past few years as the accuracy of cosmological observations improves. In this review we discuss in a unified manner many existing signals in cosmological and astrophysical data that appear to be in some tension (2σ or larger) with the standard ΛCDM model as defined by the Planck18 parameter values. In addition to the major well studied 5σ challenge of ΛCDM (the Hubble H0 crisis) and other well known tensions (the growth tension and the lensing amplitude AL anomaly), we discuss a wide range of other less discussed less-standard signals which appear at a lower statistical significance level than the H0 tension (also known as 'curiosities' in the data) which may also constitute hints towards new physics. For example such signals include cosmic dipoles (the fine structure constant α, velocity and quasar dipoles), CMB asymmetries, BAO Lyα tension, age of the Universe issues, the Lithium problem, small scale curiosities like the core-cusp and missing satellite problems, quasars Hubble diagram, oscillating short range gravity signals etc. The goal of this pedagogical review is to collectively present the current status of these signals and their level of significance, with emphasis to the Hubble crisis and refer to recent resources where more details can be found for each signal. We also briefly discuss possible theoretical approaches that can potentially explain the non-standard nature of some of these signals. CONTENTS II.2.9. Cosmic chronometers 21 II.2.10. HII galaxy measurements 21 I. Introduction2 II.2.11. Combinations of data 22 II.2.12. The current status - Historic II. Hubble Crisis6 evolution 23 II.1. Methods for measuring H0 6 II.3. Theoretical models 24 II.1.1. Standard candles as probes of II.3.1. Late time deformations of the luminosity distance7 Hubble expansion rate H(z) 24 II.1.2. Sound horizon as standard ruler: II.3.2. Late time modifications - early time calibrators9 Recalibration of the SnIa II.1.3. Time delays: gravitational absolute luminosity 29 lensing 12 II.3.3. Early time modifications 31 II.1.4. Standard sirens: gravitational waves 12 III. Other Tensions - Curiosities 35 II.1.5. Megamaser technique 13 III.1. Growth tension 35 II.1.6. Tully-Fisher relation (TFR) as III.1.1. Methods and data 35 distance indicator. 14 III.1.2. Theoretical models 38 II.1.7. Extragalactic background light III.2. CMB anisotropy anomalies 41 γ-ray attenuation 14 III.2.1. Hints for a closed Universe II.1.8. Cosmic chronometers 15 (CMB vs BAO) 41 II.1.9. HII galaxy measurements 15 III.2.2. Anomalously strong ISW effect 41 II.2. Observational data - Constraints 15 III.2.3. CMB cold spot 42 II.2.1. SnIa 15 III.2.4. Cosmic hemispherical power II.2.2. CMB 16 asymmetry 42 arXiv:2105.05208v2 [astro-ph.CO] 18 May 2021 II.2.3. Baryon acoustic oscillations 17 III.2.5. Quadrupole-octopole II.2.4. Strong gravitational lensing 18 alignment 42 II.2.5. Gravitational waves 20 III.2.6. Lack of large-angle CMB II.2.6. Megamaser data 20 temperature correlations 43 II.2.7. Tully Fisher 20 III.2.7. Anomaly on super-horizon II.2.8. Extragalactic background light scales 43 γ-ray attenuation 21 III.2.8. The lensing anomaly 44 III.2.9. High-low l consistency 44 III.2.10. The preference for odd parity correlations 44 ∗ [email protected] III.3. Cosmic dipoles 44 y [email protected] III.3.1. Velocity radio dipole 45 2 III.3.2. Quasar dipole 46 • There are six independent (free) parameters: the 2 III.3.3. Fine structure constant α baryon !b = Ω0bh and cold dark matter !c = 2 −1 dipole 47 Ω0ch energy densities (where h = H0=100 km s III.4. BAO curiosities 47 Mpc−1 is the dimensionless Hubble constant and III.5. Parity violating rotation of CMB linear ΩX ≡ ρX /ρcrit is the density of component X rel- 2 polarization (Cosmic Birefringence) 47 ative to the critical density, ρcrit = 3H =8πG), the III.6. Small-scale curiosities 48 angular diameter distance to the sound horizon at III.7. Age of the Universe 49 last scattering θs, the amplitude As and tilt ns of III.8. The Lithium problem 49 primordial scalar fluctuations and the reionization III.9. Quasars Hubble diagram 50 optical depth τ. III.10. Oscillating signals in short range gravity experiments 50 • The spatial part of the cosmic metric is assumed III.11. Anomalously low baryon temperature 51 to be flat described by the Friedmann-Lema^ıtre- III.12. Colliding clusters with high velocity 51 Roberson-Walker (FLRW) metric ds2 = dt2 − a(t)2(dr2 + r2dθ2 + r2sin2θdφ2) (1.2) IV. Conclusions-Discussion-Outlook 51 which emerges from the CP. Acknowledgements 57 Assuming this form of the metric and Einstein's References 57 field equations with a Λ-term we obtain the Fried- mann equations which may be written as a_ 2 8πGρ + Λc2 I. INTRODUCTION H2 ≡ = (1.3) a2 3 The concordance or standard Λ Cold Dark Matter (ΛCDM) model [1,2] is a well defined, predictive and a¨ 4πG 3p Λc2 = − (ρ + ) + (1.4) simple cosmological model (for a review, see Ref. [3]). It a 3 c2 3 relies on a set of simple assumptions: 1 where a is the scale factor a = 1+z (with z the • The Universe consists of radiation (photons, neutri- redshift). The cosmological constant may also be nos), ordinary matter (baryons and leptons), cold viewed as a cosmic dark energy fluid with equation (non-relativistic) dark matter (CDM) [4{10] being of state parameter responsible for structure formation and cosmologi- p cal constant Λ [2], a homogeneous form of energy w = Λ = −1 (1.5) which is responsible for the late time observed ac- ρΛ celerated expansion. The cosmological constant is where ρΛ and pΛ are the energy density and the currently associated with a dark energy or vac- pressure of the dark energy respectively. uum energy whose density remains constant even in an expanding background (for a review, see Refs. • A primordial phase of cosmic inflation (a period of [1, 11, 12]). rapid accelerated expansion) is also assumed in or- der to address the horizon and flatness problems • General Relativity (GR) [13] is the correct theory [14{17]. During this period, Gaussian scale in- that describes gravity on cosmological scales. Thus, variant primordial fluctuations are produced from the action currently relevant on cosmological scales quantum fluctuations in the inflationary epoch. reads Fundamental generalizations of the standard ΛCDM Z p 1 S = d4x −g (R − 2Λ) model may be produced by modifying the defining ac- 16πG tion (1.1) by generalizing the fundamental constants to 1 dynamical variables in the existing action or adding new + F F µν + L ( ; A) (1.1) 4α µν m terms. Thus the following extensions of ΛCDM emerge: where α is the fine structure constant, G is New- • Promoting Newton's constant to a dynamical de- gree of freedom by allowing it to depend on a scalar ton's constant, Fµν is the electromagnetic field- field Φ as G ! G(Φ(r; t)) where the dynamics of Φ strength tensor and Lm is the Lagrangian density is determined by kinetic and potential terms added for all matter fields m. to the action. This class of theories is known as • The Cosmological Principle (CP) states that the 'scalar-tensor theories' with its most general form Universe is statistically homogeneous and isotropic with second order dynamical equations the Horn- in space and matter at sufficiently large scales (& deski theories [18, 19] (for a comprehensive review, 100 Mpc). see Ref. [20, 21]). 3 • Promoting the cosmological constant to a dynami- s−1Mpc−1 [53] while the local measurements using cal degree of freedom by the introduction of a scalar Cepheid calibrators indicate H0 = 74:03 ± 1:42 km field (quintessence) with Λ ! V (Φ(r; t)) and the s−1Mpc−1 [57] (4:4σ, 9%). A wide range of local introduction of a proper kinetic term. observations appear to be consistently larger than the Planck/ΛCDM measurement of H0 at various • Allowing for a dynamical Fine Structure Constant levels of statistical significance [58, 59]. Theoretical (Maxwell Dilaton theories) with α ! α(Φ(r; t)) models addressing the Hubble tension utilize either [22{26] (for a review, see Ref. [27]). a recalibration of the Planck/ΛCDM standard ruler • Addition of new terms to the action which may be (the sound horizon) assuming new physics before functions of the Ricci scalar, the torsion scalar or the time of recombination [60{62] or a deformation other invariants ((f(R); f(T );::: )) [28{34]. of the Hubble expansion rate H(z) at late times [63, 64] or a recalibration of the SnIa absolute lu- The ΛCDM model has been remarkably successful in ex- minosity due to late time new physics [65, 66] (for plaining most properties of a wide range of cosmologi- a review, see Refs. [67, 68] and for a relevant talk, cal observations including the accelerating expansion of see Ref. [69]). the Universe, [35, 36], the power spectrum and statistical properties of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) • The growth tension (2 − 3σ): Direct mea- anisotropies [37], the spectrum and statistical properties surements of the growth rate of cosmological per- of large scale structures of the Universe [3, 38] and the turbations (Weak Lensing, Redshift Space Distor- observed abundances of different types of light nuclei hy- tions (peculiar velocities), Cluster Counts) indicate drogen, deuterium, helium, and lithium [39{42].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRESS RELEASE Solved: the Mystery of the Expansion of the Universe
    PRESS RELEASE Geneva | March 10th, 2020 The earth, solar system, entire Milky Way and the few thousand ga- Solved: laxies closest to us move in a vast “bubble” that is 250 million light years in diameter, where the average density of matter is half as large the mystery as for the rest of the universe. This is the hypothesis put forward by a theoretical physicist from the University of Geneva (UNIGE) to solve of the expansion a conundrum that has been splitting the scientific community for a decade: at what speed is the universe expanding? Until now, at least of the universe two independent calculation methods have arrived at two values that are different by about 10% with a deviation that is statistically A UNIGE researcher has irreconcilable. This new approach, which is set out in the journal Phy- solved a scientific sics Letters B, erases this divergence without making use of any “new controversy about the speed physics”. of the expansion The universe has been expanding since the Big Bang occurred 13.8 bil- of the universe by lion years ago – a proposition first made by the Belgian canon and suggesting that it is not physicist Georges Lemaître (1894-1966), and first demonstrated by Edwin Hubble (1889-1953). The American astronomer discovered in totally homogeneous on a 1929 that every galaxy is pulling away from us, and that the most dis- large scale. tant galaxies are moving the most quickly. This suggests that there was a time in the past when all the galaxies were located at the same spot, a time that can only correspond to the Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) Theory: a Possible Origin of Dark Matter and Dark Energy
    universe Article The Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) Theory: A Possible Origin of Dark Matter and Dark Energy Andre Maeder 1,* and Vesselin G. Gueorguiev 2,3 1 Geneva Observatory, University of Geneva, chemin des Maillettes 51, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland 2 Institute for Advanced Physical Studies, Montevideo Street, Sofia 1618, Bulgaria; [email protected] 3 Ronin Institute for Independent Scholarship, 127 Haddon Pl., Montclair, NJ 07043, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 February 2020; Accepted: 9 March 2020; Published: 18 March 2020 Abstract: The Scale Invariant Vacuum (SIV) theory rests on the basic hypothesis that the macroscopic empty space is scale invariant. This hypothesis is applied in the context of the Integrable Weyl Geometry, where it leads to considerable simplifications in the scale covariant cosmological equations. After an initial explosion and a phase of braking, the cosmological models show a continuous acceleration of the expansion. Several observational tests of the SIV cosmology are performed: on the relation between H0 and the age of the Universe, on the m − z diagram for SNIa data and its extension to z = 7 with quasars and GRBs, and on the H(z) vs. z relation. All comparisons show a very good agreement between SIV predictions and observations. Predictions for the future observations of the redshift drifts are also given. In the weak field approximation, the equation of motion contains, in addition to the classical Newtonian term, an acceleration term (usually very small) depending on the velocity. The two-body problem is studied, showing a slow expansion of the classical conics. The new equation has been applied to clusters of galaxies, to rotating galaxies (some proximities with Modifies Newtonian Dynamics, MOND, are noticed), to the velocity dispersion vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Instrumental Performance and Results from Testing of the BLAST-TNG Receiver, Submillimeter Optics, and MKID Arrays
    Instrumental performance and results from testing of the BLAST-TNG receiver, submillimeter optics, and MKID arrays Nicholas Galitzkia, Peter Adeb, Francesco E. Angil`ea, Peter Ashtonc, Jason Austermannd, Tashalee Billingsa, George Chee, Hsiao-Mei Chof, Kristina Davise, Mark Devlina, Simon Dickera, Bradley J. Dobera, Laura M. Fisselc, Yasuo Fukuig, Jiansong Gaod, Samuel Gordone, Christopher E. Groppie, Seth Hillbranda, Gene C. Hiltond, Johannes Hubmayrd, Kent D. Irwinh, Jeffrey Kleina, Dale Lif, Zhi-Yun Lii, Nathan P. Louriea, Ian Lowea, Hamdi Manie, Peter G. Martinj, Philip Mauskopfe, Christopher McKenneyd, Federico Natia, Giles Novakc, Enzo Pascaleb, Giampaolo Pisanob, Fabio P. Santosc, Douglas Scottk, Adrian Sinclaire, Juan D. Solerl, Carole Tuckerb, Matthew Underhille, Michael Vissersd, and Paul Williamsc aUniversity of Pennsylvania, 209 S 33rd St, Philadelphia, PA, USA bUniversity of Cardiff, The Parade, Cardiff, United Kingdom cCenter for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA dNational Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, USA eArizona State University, PO Box 871404, Tempe, AZ, USA fSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA, USA gNagoya University, Furocho, Chikusa Ward, Nagoya, Aichi Prefecture, Japan hStanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA, USA iUniversity of Virginia, 530 McCormick Road, Charlottesville, VA, USA jUniversity of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, Canada lUniversity of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, Canada kLaboratoire AIM, Paris-Saclay, CEA/IRFU/SAp - CNRS - Universit´eParis Diderot, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France ABSTRACT Polarized thermal emission from interstellar dust grains can be used to map magnetic fields in star forming molecular clouds and the diffuse interstellar medium (ISM).
    [Show full text]
  • XIII Publications, Presentations
    XIII Publications, Presentations 1. Refereed Publications E., Kawamura, A., Nguyen Luong, Q., Sanhueza, P., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: First Results from Aasi, J., et al. including Fujimoto, M.-K., Hayama, K., Kawamura, High Angular Resolution Observations toward the HL Tau Region, S., Mori, T., Nishida, E., Nishizawa, A.: 2015, Characterization of ApJ, 808, L3. the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run, Classical Quantum ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravity, 32, 115012. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Ao, Y., Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Hatsukade, B., Matsuda, Y., Iono, D., Kurono, Y.: 2015, The 2014 Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Astrophysical Implications ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Observations of the Strongly of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914, ApJ, 818, L22. Lensed Submillimeter Galaxy HATLAS J090311.6+003906 at z = Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific 3.042, ApJ, 808, L4. Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, Observation of ALMA Partnership, et al. including Asaki, Y., Hirota, A., Nakanishi, Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. K., Espada, D., Kameno, S., Sawada, T., Takahashi, S., Kurono, Lett., 116, 061102. Y., Tatematsu, K.: 2015, The 2014 ALMA Long Baseline Campaign: Abbott, B. P., et al. including Flaminio, R., LIGO Scientific Observations of Asteroid 3 Juno at 60 Kilometer Resolution, ApJ, Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: 2016, GW150914: Implications 808, L2. for the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Binary Black Alonso-Herrero, A., et al. including Imanishi, M.: 2016, A mid-infrared Holes, Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • AAO of the FUTURE AAO of Next Generation Fibre Positioning Robots
    IAU SPECIAL EDITION JULY 2003 NEWSLETTER ANGLO-AUSTRALIAN OBSERVATORY AAO OF THE FUTURE Next generation fibre positioning robots. Microrobotic technology based on the AAO’s Echidna system allows accurate positioning of payloads such as single fibres, guide bundles, mini- IFUs or even pick-off mirrors to be accurately positioned on large focal plates for large and ‘extremely large’ telescopes. See article on page 18. contents 3The Anglo-Australian Planet Search finDs a new “Solar System”-like gas giant (Chris Tinney et al.) 4RAVE hits the galaxy (FreD Watson et al.) 8A search for the highest reDshift raDio galaxies (Carlos De Breuck et al.) 9The 6DF Galaxy Survey (Will SaunDers et al.) 14 The end of observations for the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey (Matthew Colless et al.) 18 Directions for future instrumentation Development by the AAO (AnDrew McGrath et al.) 20 AAΩ: the successor to 2dF (Terry Bridges et al.) DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE DIRECTOR’S DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE On behalf of the staff of the Anglo-Australian Observatory, I would like to extend a warm welcome to Sydney to all IAU General Assembly delegates. This special GA edition of the AAO newsletter showcases some of the AAO’s achievements over the past year as well as some exciting new directions in which the AAO is heading in the future. Over the past few years the AAO has increasingly sought to build on its scientific and technical expertise through the design and building of astronomical instrumentation for overseas observatories, whilst maintaining its own telescopes as world-class facilities. The success of science programs such as the Anglo-Australian Planet Search and the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey amply demonstrate that the AAO is still facilitating the production of outstanding science by its user communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1903.02940V2
    Proton decay and the quantum structure of spacetime 1, 1, 2,3, 4,5, Abeer Al-Modlej, ∗ Salwa Alsaleh, † Hassan Alshal, ‡ and Ahmed Farag Ali § 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia 2Department of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA 3Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt 4Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Benha University, Benha, 13518, Egypt 5Quantum Gravity Research, Los Angeles, CA 90290, USA (Dated: October 29, 2019) Abstract Virtual black holes in noncommutative spacetime are investigated using coordinate coherent state formalism such that the event horizon of black hole is manipulated by smearing it with a Gaussian of width √θ, where θ is the noncommutativity parameter. Proton lifetime, the main associated phenomenology of the noncommutative virtual black holes, has been studied: first in 4 dimensional spacetime and then generalized to D dimensions. The lifetime depends on θ and the number of spacetime dimensions such that it emphasizes on the measurement of proton lifetime as a potential probe for the micro-structure of spacetime. Introduction promising to divulge many secrets about how nature works on quantum gravity level [22]. A black hole with 9 mass of Sun would have TBH 60 10− K at the event Since the introduction of Hawking radiation [1], horizon, while a black hole with∼ mass× of Earth’s moon geometrical many semiclassical, non-classical [2–9] and would have the surface temperature 2.7 K. So the ra- [10–12] endeavours—seeking “the” unified theory—have diation of astrophysical massive black∼ hole is too minute been striving to “shoehorn” general relativity into the to be detected in the Cosmic Microwave Background framework of quantum field theories (QFT).
    [Show full text]
  • The Hi Velocity Function: a Test of Cosmology Or Baryon Physics?
    MNRAS 000,1{19 (2019) Preprint 18 July 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The Hi Velocity Function: a test of cosmology or baryon physics? Garima Chauhan,1;2? Claudia del P. Lagos,1;2 Danail Obreschkow,1;2 Chris Power,1;2 Kyle Oman,3 Pascal J. Elahi,1;2 1International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), 7 Fairway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. 2ARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Australia. 3Kapteyn Institute,Landleven 12, 9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands. Accepted XXX. Received YYY; in original form ZZZ ABSTRACT Accurately predicting the shape of the Hi velocity function of galaxies is regarded widely as a fundamental test of any viable dark matter model. Straightforward anal- yses of cosmological N-body simulations imply that the ΛCDM model predicts an overabundance of low circular velocity galaxies when compared to observed Hi ve- locity functions. More nuanced analyses that account for the relationship between galaxies and their host haloes suggest that how we model the influence of baryonic processes has a significant impact on Hi velocity function predictions. We explore this in detail by modelling Hi emission lines of galaxies in the Shark semi-analytic galaxy formation model, built on the surfs suite of ΛCDM N-body simulations. We create a simulated ALFALFA survey, in which we apply the survey selection function and account for effects such as beam confusion, and compare simulated and observed Hi velocity width distributions, finding differences of . 50%, orders of magnitude smaller than the discrepancies reported in the past.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIDER Experiment
    Searching for the echoes of inflation with H. Cynthia Chiang University of KwaZulu-Natal Madrid: CMB, LSS, 21cm June 24, 2016 B mode polarization in the CMB E modes are the CMB's “intrinsic polarization” We expect them to be there because of scattering processes in the CMB Temperature anisotropies predict E-mode spectra with almost no extra information Not only that, but “standard” CMB scattering physics generates ONLY E modes. Why do we care about B modes? Inflation: exponential expansion of universe (x 1025) at 10-35 sec after big bang creates a gravitational wave background that leaves a B-mode imprint on CMB polarization. Gravitational lensing by large scale structure converts some of the E-mode polarization to B-mode. Use this to study structure formation, “weigh” neutrinos. How can we tell the difference between the above two? Degree vs. arcminute angular scales. The moral of the story: B modes tell us things about the universe that temperature and E modes can't. Inflation scorecard Inflation predicts: Our universe (Planck 2015): A flat universe Ωk = 0.000 ± 0.0025 with nearly scale-invariant ns = 0.968 ± 0.006 density fluctuations, well described by a power law, dns / d lnk = -0.0065 ± 0.0076 with scalar perturbations r0.002 < 0.01 (at 2σ) that are Gaussian fNL = 2.5 ± 5.7 and adiabatic, βiso < 0.03 (at 2σ) with a negligible contribution from topological defects f10 < 0.04 (Adapted from Martin White) Constraining inflation Planck 2015 CMB polarization power spectra E-mode E-mode is mainly sourced by density fluctuations and is the intrinsic polarization of the CMB Degree-scale B-mode from gravitational waves, amplitude described by the tensor-to-scalar ratio r.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Wrong
    Einstein’s wrong way: from STR to GTR Adrian Ferent I discovered a new Gravitation theory which breaks the wall of Planck scale! Abstract My Nobel Prize - Discoveries “Starting from STR, it is not possible to find a Quantum Gravity theory” Adrian Ferent “Einstein was on the wrong way: from STR to GTR” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Starting from STR, Einstein was not able to explain Gravitation, he calculated Gravitation” Adrian Ferent “Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong because the gravitational force experienced locally is caused by a negative energy, gravitons energy and the force experienced by an observer in a non-inertial (accelerated) frame of reference is caused by a positive energy.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein's equivalence principle is wrong, Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong.” Adrian Ferent “Because Einstein’s gravitation theory is wrong, LQG, String theory… are wrong theories” Adrian Ferent “Einstein bent the space, Ferent unbent the space” Adrian Ferent 1 “Einstein bent the time, Ferent unbent the time” Adrian Ferent “I am the first who Quantized the Gravitational Field!” Adrian Ferent “I quantized the gravitational field with gravitons” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational field is a discrete function” Adrian Ferent “Gravitational waves are carried by gravitons” Adrian Ferent In STR and GTR there are continuous functions. This is another proof that LIGO is a fraud. The 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded for a project, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) not for a scientific discovery; they did not detect anything because Einstein’s gravitational waves do not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • IRAC Near-Infrared Features in the Outer Parts of S4G Galaxies
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1{26 (2014) Printed 15 June 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Spitzer/IRAC Near-Infrared Features in the Outer Parts of S4G Galaxies Seppo Laine,1? Johan H. Knapen,2;3 Juan{Carlos Mu~noz{Mateos,4:5 Taehyun Kim,4;5;6;7 S´ebastienComer´on,8;9 Marie Martig,10 Benne W. Holwerda,11 E. Athanassoula,12 Albert Bosma,12 Peter H. Johansson,13 Santiago Erroz{Ferrer,2;3 Dimitri A. Gadotti,5 Armando Gil de Paz,14 Joannah Hinz,15 Jarkko Laine,8;9 Eija Laurikainen,8;9 Kar´ınMen´endez{Delmestre,16 Trisha Mizusawa,4;17 Michael W. Regan,18 Heikki Salo,8 Kartik Sheth,4;1;19 Mark Seibert,7 Ronald J. Buta,20 Mauricio Cisternas,2;3 Bruce G. Elmegreen,21 Debra M. Elmegreen,22 Luis C. Ho,23;7 Barry F. Madore7 and Dennis Zaritsky24 1Spitzer Science Center - Caltech, MS 314-6, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 3Departamento de Astrof´ısica, Universidad de La Laguna, 38206 La Laguna, Spain 4National Radio Astronomy Observatory/NAASC, Charlottesville, 520 Edgemont Road, VA 22903, USA 5European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile 6Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea 7The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA 8Division of Astronomy, Department of Physics, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, 90014 Oulu, Finland 9Finnish Centre of Astronomy with ESO (FINCA), University of Turku, V¨ais¨al¨antie20, FIN-21500 Piikki¨o 10Max-Planck Institut f¨urAstronomie, K¨onigstuhl17 D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 11Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connection Between Galaxy Stellar Masses and Dark Matter
    The Connection Between Galaxy Stellar Masses and Dark Matter Halo Masses: Constraints from Semi-Analytic Modeling and Correlation Functions by Catherine E. White A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland August, 2016 c Catherine E. White 2016 ⃝ All rights reserved Abstract One of the basic observations that galaxy formation models try to reproduce is the buildup of stellar mass in dark matter halos, generally characterized by the stellar mass-halo mass relation, M? (Mhalo). Models have difficulty matching the < 11 observed M? (Mhalo): modeled low mass galaxies (Mhalo 10 M ) form their stars ∼ ⊙ significantly earlier than observations suggest. Our goal in this thesis is twofold: first, work with a well-tested semi-analytic model of galaxy formation to explore the physics needed to match existing measurements of the M? (Mhalo) relation for low mass galaxies and second, use correlation functions to place additional constraints on M? (Mhalo). For the first project, we introduce idealized physical prescriptions into the semi-analytic model to test the effects of (1) more efficient supernova feedback with a higher mass-loading factor for low mass galaxies at higher redshifts, (2) less efficient star formation with longer star formation timescales at higher redshift, or (3) less efficient gas accretion with longer infall timescales for lower mass galaxies. In addition to M? (Mhalo), we examine cold gas fractions, star formation rates, and metallicities to characterize the secondary effects of these prescriptions. ii ABSTRACT The technique of abundance matching has been widely used to estimate M? (Mhalo) at high redshift, and in principle, clustering measurements provide a powerful inde- pendent means to derive this relation.
    [Show full text]