Kevin Cole Named Dean of the University of San Diego School of Law

universityofsan diego SCHOOL OF LAW advocate

23:1 SUMMER 2006 BOARD OF VISITORS Chair advocate James C. Krause ’75

Elaine Alexander EDITOR G. Edward Arledge ’73 Angie Jensen Richard A. Bayer ’83 Theodore Boutrous ’87 WRITERS Alan Brubaker ’76 Kristin Essner ’06 Cathryn Campbell George Decker Elizabeth Carson ALUMNI ASSOCIATION Vincent Lapietra ’07 John Carson ’88 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Anna A. Long ’06 (LL.M.) Henry Casden ’70 Professor David McGowan Kevin Cole* President Professor Michael Rappaport Steven Cologne ’84 Dennis J. Doucette ’86 Sarah Severson Dennis Doucette ’86* Brent Wakefield Sergio Feria ’82 President Elect Michael Ferrara Jr. ’72 Jeffrey T. Thomas ’82 CONTRIBUTORS Thompson Fetter ’67 Kabu Adodoadji ’06 John Forry Vice President Abigail Gurney David Geerdes The Honorable Robert J. Trentacosta ’79 Trevin Hartwell The Honorable David Gill JoEllen Kay Susan Gonick ’86 Immediate Past President Ruth Levor J. Ernesto Grijalva ’84 Denise M. Hickey ’94 Kay S. Manansala Daniel Grindle ’73 Mary Moreno John R. Henkel ’77 Angeline Anastasopoulos (SBA) Teresa O’Rourke Denise Hickey ’94* James R. Ballard ’95 Anne Tuite The Honorable Richard D. Huffman Laura M. Berend ’75 Ashley Wood Peter Hughes Craig P. Cherney ’96 Steven Hunsicker ’75 Kevin Cole (ex officio) PHOTOGRAPHERS Michael Kaplan ’72 Richard Doren ’86 Brigid Ann Bennett Jennifer Kearns Julie Dunne ’92 Leslie K. Bruce Martin Kruming Michel Duquella ’94 George Decker Alex Landon ’71 Chad Fuller ’97 Gates Photography The Honorable Melinda Lasater ’73 Stephen Halsey ’78 Angie Jensen Stanley Legro John (Jay) A. Jurata, Jr. ’00 Pablo Mason The Honorable Frederic Link ’68 Michael B. Kelly Brent Wakefield The Honorable Judith McConnell Lynne R. Lasry ’79 John McGrory ’81 Marty Lorenzo ’96 DESIGN Gerald McMahon ’64 Patrick W. Martin ’92 Patera Design LLC Edwin Meese Robert Y. Nagata ’70 James Mulvaney Hallen Rosner ’83 COVER PHOTO The Honorable Gilbert Nares ’67 Tom Sohn ’02 Pablo Mason Virginia C. Nelson ’79 The Honorable Timothy R. Walsh ’91 David A. Niddrie ’79 The Honorable Thomas J. Whelan ’65 The Advocate is published Peter K. Nunez ’70 semi-annually by the University The Honorable Christine V. Pate ’69 of San Diego School of Law Communications Department. Regina Petty Donald Rez Please address all The Honorable Lynn Schenk ’70 correspondence to: Gary W. Schons ’76 The Advocate University of San Diego Alan Schulman School of Law Thomas E. Sharkey ’59 5998 Alcalá Park Abby B. Silverman ’79 San Diego, CA 92110-2492 Robert L. Simmons Phone: (619) 260-4207 E-mail: [email protected] The Honorable Kenneth So Michael T. Thorsnes ’68 © 2006 USD School of Law John Wallner ’93 Michael J. Weaver ’73 Colin W. Wied The Honorable Howard Wiener

*ex-ofﬁcio member contents Features 9 Law Alumni Weekend A look back at 2005 and what’s in store for 2006. 13 USD Legal Clinics Celebrate Their 35th Anniversary Three decades of helping the San Diego 10 community one client at a time. No Stranger to USD— Kevin Cole is named the 11th Dean of the USD School of Law. Faculty Essays Departments 2 MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN 18 Looking Back, Moving Forward Judge Breyer’s Active Liberty 3 CAMPUS BRIEFS By Mike Rappaport, Professor of Law An update on the law school’s achievements and programs

24 F ACULTY FOOTNOTES News about faculty members’ 20 publications and presentations The Continuing 30 CLASS ACTION Convergence Catch up with the personal and of Patent Misuse and professional lives of alumni Antitrust Doctrine 43 ACADEMIC YEAR IN REVIEW By David McGowan, School events, workshops and Professor of Law faculty colloquia SPECIAL SECTION 46 ENDOWMENT CAMPAIGN REPORT Acknowledging gifts and pledge 47 commitments from Alumni and friends Honor Roll 65 ON THE DOCKET Thanking those who gave to the School of Law A calendar of law school events and activities in the 2004–2005 ﬁscal year. message from the dean

Looking Back, Moving Forward

ulty was ranked 22nd nationally in friends, and making the case for that overall scholarly quality in a survey of support will be an important focus dur- leading law academics and 23rd nation- ing the coming years. I need look no ally in a study measuring how often further back than the past year to feel faculty work is cited by others. In the confident about the future in this re- twelve-month period ending in July gard. The report on the capital cam- 2006, the faculty ranked 19th nation- paign for the law school, which ally in the number of times their papers appears later in this issue, shows the have been downloaded from the Social willingness of our alumni and friends to Science Research Network. support the school’s ambitions. While The rising recognition of the faculty we currently lag behind our competi- has occurred in conjunction with the tors in the size of our endowment, we his message reaches you at about rising credentials of our entering stu- can confidently look forward to the the time that I welcome the fall dents. When I joined the faculty, we day when the resources available to the 2006 incoming class to campus; received 2,450 applications for our school make our past a mere prologue the first class I welcome as dean entering class; in the last few years, to the even greater successes ahead. T of the law school. Times like this the number has consistently exceeded both summon memories and inspire 5,000 and once exceeded 6,000. The plans. Let me share some of each. increasing popularity of the school has, When I joined the faculty in the fall as one might expect, brought an in- 1987 semester, Sheldon Krantz was crease in the statistical profile of the dean. He was followed by Grant incoming class. KEVIN COLE Morris (as interim dean), Kristine Looking forward, my goal is to con- DEAN AND PROFESSOR OF LAW Strachan, Grant Morris (as interim tinue the upward trends from which dean again) and Daniel Rodriguez. I have benefited during my career at Under the leadership of these deans, USD. We should continue to remain USD evolved. Before I arrived on the attractive to gifted scholars who enjoy picturesque mesa on which USD sits, (and excel at) the process of educating the law school had a solid reputation new lawyers. And we should make for providing rigorous, high-quality USD even more attractive to prospec- preparation for new lawyers. tive students. We have recently aug- Since my arrival, however, I have mented the resources available to our had the great pleasure of watching Career Services Office to enable our the school grow in national reputation. new Assistant Dean of Career Services, Faculty members hired during my Cara Mitnick, to make the changes time here—as well as those who came needed to improve our services to stu- before—have done much to raise dents in this vital area, and we are like- the scholarly profile of the school. wise increasing other student services. Recently in the Leiter Law School USD’s future success will depend on Rankings, out of the 194 faculties at our ability to increase financial support ABA-accredited law schools, our fac- for the school from alumni and other

2 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE campus briefs

2006 Paul A. McLennon, Sr. Honors Moot Court Competition Wood, Burns and Huffman Serve as Judges for USD’s Most Prestigious Intramural Moot Court Competition

n March 3, Katherine Payerle District Court of Appeal for the State After deliberation, the panel ruled in and Kirsten Widner got the of California, who is also an adjunct favor of the petitioner and went on to O chance to hone their advo- faculty member of the University praise both finalists. “In the real world cacy skills in front of an imposing of San Diego School of Law. this is precisely the experience you panel of three judges in the final round The case, Chaker v. Crogan, addresses will have. The two of you are welcome of the 2006 Paul A. McLennon, Sr., whether or not California Penal anytime in our courts,” said Judge Honors Moot Court Competition. Code section 148.6 violates the First Wood. “I want to compliment you on Held at the Joan B. Kroc Institute for Amendment. Convicted for filing a how nimble you were. Both of you Peace & Justice on the USD campus, knowingly false complaint of peace listened very carefully and worked to this year’s competition drew more par- officer misconduct in violation of answer questions.” ticipants than ever. More than 200 section 148.6, Chaker filed a habeas Established through the generosity of members of the bar were needed to corpus petition in federal court chal- USD law Professor Michael Devitt and assist with the competition. lenging the constitutionality of section his family in honor of longtime family The Honorable Diane P. Wood 148.6. He argued that section 148.6 friend, attorney and naval aviator Paul of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the violates the First Amendment because A. McLennon, Sr., the McLennon Seventh Circuit presided over a panel it only punishes lies that are critical Honors Moot Court Competition pro- that included U.S. District Court of the government. vides an opportunity for students to de- Judge Larry Alan Burns of the In the final round, Widner repre- velop their brief writing and advocacy Southern District of California and sented the state of California and skills and to test these skills in an open, Justice Richard Huffman of the Fourth Payerle represented the petitioner. rigorous competition.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Visits School of Law

ustice Antonin Scalia will be visiting the University of San Diego School of Law as Distinguished J Jurist-in-Residence in fall 2006. Be sure to visit www.law.sandiego.edu for details.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 3 campus briefs

Anders’ Energy Makes Epic Changes Scott Anders named Administrative Director of the Energy and Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC)

ith a history of working on energy policy issues would better respond to users’ and a belief that energy is a non-partisan issue that needs, making energy use more W can improve financial well-being, Scott Anders efficient. quickly settled into the directorship of the Energy and Policy Anders hopes to host a confer- Initiatives Center (EPIC) at the University of San Diego ence on climate change, regula- School of Law. tion and policy in fall 2006. “This The center, funded through a cy pres settlement, has two is the best time to be studying sides. One is academic with a program at the law school and California climate change policy, the other is research and analysis. “Over time, we’d like to particularly with regard to carbon increase offerings at USD in terms of energy and environ- emissions, because there are many mental law,” Anders explains. proposed works in the state legislature,” Anders says. The two sides of EPIC merge when law students perform EPIC was initially funded with a $2.7 million portion research at the center for school credit. Among the student of a settlement against Duke Energy for the San Diego projects with expected completion dates in 2006 are a treat- District Attorney. Anders plans to supplement the center’s ment of California solar energy laws and a study of renew- finances by raising an additional $3 million in the near future. able energy credit ownership. By fall semester 2006, the center’s personnel will include a EPIC has also teamed up with the Utility Consumers’ law professor specializing in the area of energy policy. Action Network (UCAN) and San Diego Gas & Electric to For more information on EPIC and Scott Anders, visit study the possibility of creating a “smart” energy grid that www.sandiego.edu/epic.

See a Movie, Eat Some Pizza, Change the World Professor Orly Lobel Hosts the Law and Social Justice Film Series

he Law and Social Justice Film think and laugh and cry and become graduate degree recipient John Carlos Series, hosted by Professor interested in the world.” Frey. USD law professor Jean Ramirez, T Orly Lobel, began screening Many professors use examples from who teaches criminal law and evidence, films at the law school during the fall movies in class. It made sense to create spoke before “Capturing the Friedmans.” 2005 semester. Chosen for social and a film series open to everybody, Lobel The entire USD community, legal issues raised, films are preceded by says. But, she adds, the wealth of good including alumni, are invited to attend a short lecture during which viewers eat films raising social justice issues makes the series. Once released, dates and free pizza and other snacks. Usually choosing among them difficult. And times for the winter 2006 semester there are enough chairs for everyone, she must not only choose a good will be made available in USD’s law but the series has become so popular movie, but one that will mesh with alumni newsletter “The Docket” online that some films have drawn standing- a lecturer’s expertise. at http://www.sandiego.edu/usdlaw/ room only crowds. Whether sitting, USD professors and alumni have both about/publications/docket. standing or lounging on the floor, fac- been involved in the film series. Robert The School of Law has provided ulty, students and community members Goff, a law graduate and founder of generous funding for the program, intermix in this not-for-credit forum. Restore International, spoke before a Lobel says. But the film series is not Professor Lobel fosters the informal- showing of “Born Into Brothels.” Another a big expense, she adds. It is dinner, ity; she wanted to create a place where film, “The Gatekeeper,” was written, a movie and maybe at the end of “students and staff get together and directed and produced by USD under- the day a wider worldview.

4 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE School of Law Mourns the Loss of Justice Gerald Brown

he University of San Diego University of San Diego, of which he As a jurist, Justice Brown was T School of Law mourns the was very proud. known for his concise and plainly loss of one of its greatest Following in his father’s footsteps, written opinions; as a presiding justice, friends, The Honorable Gerald Justice Brown was selected as a Rhodes he was renowned for overseeing an Brown, who died at the age of 90 Scholar and received his M.A. from extremely efficient intermediate appel- on December 9, 2005. Oxford University in 1949. The Browns late court. Beyond the law, he was a Known for his enduring passion for were the first father-son Rhodes Scholars Renaissance man whose wide range of life and the law, Justice Brown was a from the United States. At Oxford, interests included motorcycling, classi- founding member of the law school’s Justice Brown met and struck up a long- cal music, lawn bowling, photography Board of Visitors (1974) and a stead- standing friendship with Professor and world traveling. fast and vocal champion of the law Ronald H. Maudsley. Years later, that school’s progress and growing national friendship would prove to be of great reputation. benefit to the School of Law, when Justice Brown encouraged Professor Justice Brown was elevated to the Justice Brown presenting his Progress Fourth District Court of Appeal of Maudsley to come to the United States Award to Michael Hernandez at the 2003 California in 1963 and served as its to join its faculty in the 1970s. Graduation Awards Ceremony. presiding justice from March 16, 1965, until his retirement in 1985. While serving as presiding justice, he routinely hired new graduates of the School of Law to serve as his research attorney. At the School of Law’s Graduation Awards Ceremony on May 26, 2000, Justice Brown presented his first annual “Progress Award” to the member of the law school’s graduating class whose grade point average increased the most from the first to the third year. Justice Brown’s award, a reflection of his own character, is unique in that it honors not only academic excellence but also determination and constant self-improvement. Born on June 4, 1915, in Chamberlain, South Dakota, Justice Brown received his bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California in 1937, Phi Beta Kappa. He received his law degree from Yale Law School in 1941 and was admitted to the California bar in 1942. In 1973, Justice Brown was awarded an hon- orary Doctor of Laws degree from the

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 5 campus briefs

School of Law Hosts Armed Forces Court of Appeals

n September 22, 2005, the Christopher Turtzo, a third-year stu- School of Law hosted the dent at the law school, submitted an O United States Court of amicus brief in support of Luke’s petition Appeals for the Armed Forces as part and presented an oral argument during of the Court’s “Project Outreach.” the special session. Before the session Held in the Joan B. Kroc Institute for began, the Court’s judges met with stu- Peace & Justice, the special session dents and faculty of the School of Law was open to the general public. to discuss the military justice system After welcoming remarks by Dean and the role of the Court. judges appointed for 15-year terms by Kevin Cole, a panel consisting of The Court exercises worldwide the U.S. president with the advice and Chief Judge H.F. “Sparky” Gierke and appellate jurisdiction over members consent of the U.S. Senate. Through Judges Andrew S. Effron, James E. of the U.S. armed forces on active its decisions, the Court has a signiﬁ- Baker and Charles E. Erdman heard duty and other persons subject to the cant impact on the state of discipline an oral argument in the case of United Uniform Code of Military Justice. in the armed forces, military readiness States v. Luke. The Court is comprised of ﬁve civilian and the rights of service members.

The Thernstroms Talk about Segregation Bowes-Madison Series Brings Noted Authorities on Race and American Society to USD

n “Let’s Talk about Segregation,” Abigail and effort by the federal government to separate voters on the Stephan Thernstrom work to debunk the myth that basis of race,” concluding that America “should not have a I American society is still segregated by design. The system of proportional racial or ethnic representation based one exception: certain electoral districting practices. on redistricting.” On November 3, Abigail Thernstrom, vice chair of the The day after their presentation, the Thernstroms met with U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, and her husband Stephan and ﬁelded questions from USD law students at Warren Hall. Thernstrom, Winthrop Professor of History at Harvard Joan E. Bowes of La Jolla established the series to inspire University, spoke at the second annual presentation of the law students and other members of the San Diego commu- law school’s Joan E. Bowes-James Madison Distinguished nity and to promote the open exchange of ideas. The series Speaker Series to an audience of almost 300 in the Joan B. brings distinguished speakers from the ﬁelds of law, diplo- Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice. macy, government and politics. “Do we currently live in an apartheid America?” Stephan Thernstrom asked. Responding in the negative, he explained that America’s political and economic government policies do not, in general, create racially concentrated neighborhoods. Many African-Americans live in predominantly black neighborhoods by choice; similarly, “all immigrant groups show some degree of residential concentration,” he pointed out. Abigail Thernstrom then explored the role of the federal government in deliberately separating black and Hispanic

voters into their own electoral districts and its conse- From left to right: School of Law Dean Kevin Cole, keynote quences. She noted that “black integration into mainstream speaker Abigail Thernstrom, Joan Bowes and keynote speaker American politics has been accompanied by a determined Stephan Thernstrom.

6 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE International Tax Conference Focuses on Cross-Border Commerce USD School of Law—Procopio International Tax Institute Draws Top Experts from Mexico and the United States

both countries to the USD campus on leader at Procopio; Lic. Alfredo February 23 and 24, 2006. Gutierrez Ortiz Mena, chief counsel Held at the Joan B. Kroc Institute of the Mexican Tax Administration for Peace & Justice, the conference Service (SAT); and key tax attorneys featured keynote speakers; Lic. Julio from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service Cesar Aguilar Matías, director of tax and Treasury Department. policy for the Treasury Department of Topics covered included Mexico’s Mexico, and Rufus von Thülen new tax law reform, with an update of Rhodes, Esq., author of Rhodes & Langer, reforms affecting cross-border transac- U.S. International Taxation and Tax Treaties. tions; current developments involving In addition, members of the USD Mexico’s maquiladoras; complex issues law faculty, Professor Herbert I. regarding partnerships with foreign Lazerow, Adjunct Professor Richard partners; and current developments in he second annual University Shaw and Visiting Professor John reorganizing and liquidating U.S. and of San Diego School of Forry, spoke at the conference. The Mexican cross-border operations. T Law—Procopio International tax faculty at the School of Law is Hosted by the School of Law and Tax Institute Conference, the only currently the highest rated in the Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch conference dedicated to the latest de- western United States among law fac- LLP, the conference’s presenting sponsor velopments in the dynamic ﬁeld of ulties with graduate tax programs and was Bank of America, The Private Bank. U.S. and Mexican international tax is ranked 9th overall in the nation. The State Bar of California, Taxation law, brought more than 100 tax attor- Other featured speakers included Section, International Tax Committee, neys and other tax professionals from Patrick W. Martin, Esq., tax team was also a conference sponsor. awyerL _Su06sor If 7-CB-CS The Evidence Is In: CSI for Lawyers Was a Big Hit

ocusing on evidentiary issues from real-life cases The keynote address was given by Professor Edward ranging from battery to mayhem to murder, ex- Imwinkelried, the Edward L. Barrett, Jr. Professor of Law at F pert speakers in the School of Law’s Investigate Your the University of California, Davis. One of the nation’s lead- Case: CSI for Lawyers program kept an audience of almost ing authorities on scientific evidence and a former law pro- 200 riveted for the greater part of a Saturday on January fessor at USD, Professor Imwinkelried in his talk titled The 28, 2006. Importance of Daubert in Frye Jurisdictions, discussed the admissi- Michael Burt, Esq., a certified criminal specialist in private bility of handwriting evidence. practice in San Francisco, led off the session with a discus- Afternoon sessions included a discussion of evidence of sion of the legal issues involved in fingerprinting, concluding child injuries by Janice Jean Ophoven, M.D., a pediatric that more and more federal appellate judges are saying that forensic pathologist from Woodbury, Minnesota, and a talk fingerprint evidence is unreliable. Burt was followed by on DNA evidence by Christopher Plourd, Esq., a San Diego Richard Ernest, an award-winning forensic scientist from sole practitioner. Fort Worth, Texas, who talked about ballistics evidence. Dr. The program, moderated by USD law Professor Laura Harry Bonnell, a forensic pathology consultant based in San Berend and San Diego-area attorney Alex Landon, Esq., Diego, then focused on autopsies, accompanying his discus- was funded by a grant from Community Defenders, Inc. sion with numerous autopsy photos. and co-sponsored by the San Diego Psych-Law Society.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 7 campus briefs

egan_Su06 Si 11-CB- Remembering USD School of Law Professor Bernard H. Siegan An Unfaltering Voice for Property Rights and Economic Liberty

rofessor Bernard H. Siegan, lost. In doing so, he inspired a new one of the nation’s preemi- generation to the defense of economic P nent defenders of strong con- liberty, property rights, the due stitutional protection for property process of law and a judiciary dedi- rights and economic liberty, died cated to the rule of law and the dignity March 27, 2006, at age 81. of the individual.” Siegan spent more than 20 years Siegan’s influence was not limited to practicing law in Chicago before com- the United States; he also counseled ing to USD in 1973. While at USD, government officials and private groups he worked to convince the nation drafting new constitutions or constitu- that the right to private property and tional amendments in Eastern Europe economic liberty were basic human and elsewhere. rights. Of his many books and articles, In addition to being intellectually his 1980 book, Economic Liberties and the revered by his peers, Siegan was loved Constitution, was his most influential by students and colleagues alike. and has been credited with laying the “Bernie Siegan was a sweet, funny, op- forget his warm and gentle manner or foundation of the modern property timistic man,” USD law Professors Gail his passion for his work.” rights movement. Heriot and Maimon Schwarzschild Siegan was honored at a memorial Roger Pilon, vice president for Legal stated. “We wish we could have kept mass and Jewish service on April 18, Affairs and director of the Center for this gentle Reagan Revolutionary with 2006, at USD’s Founders Chapel. A Constitutional Studies at the Cato us a little longer.” memorial fund has been set up in his Institute, said “Bernie Siegan was a leg- “Professor Siegan was a fixture on name. Those interested in making end. Almost alone, he stood against campus,” said USD School of Law a donation should contact Trevin the forces of the day to retrieve and Dean Kevin Cole. “No one who had Hartwell, director of Development and restore a constitutional vision nearly the pleasure to know him will soon Alumni Relations, at (619) 260-4692.

Professor Georg Ress Speaks at the 22nd Annual Nathanson Lecture Series 12-CB-NathansonLecture_Su06 Property as a Human Right, According to the European Convention of Human Rights

eorg Ress, a professor of Ress discussed various aspects of ity in the area of human rights on international law at the human rights including problems of the world stage. G International University interpretation, guarantees by the The Nathaniel L. Nathanson Bremen and a former judge of the European Commission of Human Memorial Lecture Series was estab- European Court of Human Rights, Rights and the idea of property as lished in 1984 to honor the esteemed was the speaker for the 22nd annual a human right. To illustrate his mes- law professor who devoted his life to presentation of the Nathaniel L. sage, he used multiple examples of the law and legal education. This lec- Nathanson Memorial Lecture Series real world issues he has encountered ture series brings distinguished speak- on April 6, 2006, in the Joan B. Kroc over the years. He also urged for ers to the University of San Diego to Institute for Peace & Justice Theatre. greater cooperation and accountabil- discuss issues of national signiﬁcance.

8 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Law Alumni Weekend We had a great time last year—join us for an even better time this year.

Highlighted Events All Law Alumni Jazz Lounge Friday, October 6, 2006 Saturday night, a live jazz band and comfortable lounge will create the perfect backdrop for mingling with fellow alumni and law school faculty. Law Alumni Reunion Class Receptions The evening will also include dancing and a live comedy performance All alumni from the classes of 1966, 1971, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 along with heavy hors d’oeuvres, drinks and specialty desserts. are invited to celebrate with us in the Gaslamp District—a new area that has grown up around San Diego’s Petco Park. Relive memories and catch up with For a complete list of events or for more information, visit former classmates while enjoying hors d’oeuvres and cocktails. www.law.sandiego.edu/alumni/weekend or contact us at (619) 260-4692 or [email protected]. Saturday, October 7, 2006 Law Alumni Weekend will be combined with the University-wide Home- USD Legal Clinics coming Weekend to provide more activities for you to enjoy. Don’t miss Celebrating 35 Years of Service this great opportunity to reconnect with friends, classmates and faculty. We will be honoring past directors, highlighting the important work going on at the clinics today and sharing our vision for the future. Photos by George Decker and Gates Photography A Look Back at Law Alumni Weekend 2005

1 2 2 3 4 1. Saturday alumni tee off at the Riverwalk for the Alumni Golf Tournament.

2. On Friday night, alumni and guests from the classes of 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000 met at the Hilton Gaslamp in downtown San Diego. Alumni not celebrating a class reunion year met under the stars in the courtyard of the Degheri Alumni Center for the All Alumni Welcome Reception.

3. The Class of 1975 had the largest reunion party with 74 alumni and guests who gathered at the Shelter Pointe Hotel on Shelter Island. The din- 3 ner celebrated the class of 1975’s success in raising over $275,000 for The Class of 1975 Professorship.

4. Saturday evening, law alumni from every class meet at the beautiful Shiley Center for Science and Technology where they were welcomed by a 15-foot clown, a contortionist and other performers.

For more photos, go to www.law.sandiego.edu/ alumni/weekend and visit the photo gallery. ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 9 No Stranger to USD KEVIN COLE Named 11th Dean of the University of San Diego School of Law

Story by Sarah Severson Photos by George Decker and Pablo Mason

10 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE In his first commencement speech as dean, newly appointed Dean the culture of the law school, how things work and how to make Kevin Cole spoke about skills graduates would need to succeed in good things happen. the legal profession. “Kevin is affable, outgoing and is very solutions-oriented,” Rider says. “Remember the case of Napoleon Dynamite,” Cole recalls. Professor Steven Smith, chairman of the dean’s search committee, “When asked whether he had a girlfriend, Napoleon responded, said the committee was looking for a dean who would appreciate the ‘Girls only want boyfriends who have great skills. You know, like school’s academic strides in recent years. “We wanted someone who nunchuck skills, bow-hunting skills, computer-hacking skills.’ would understand this and have good academic values. Being here Napoleon’s perception that he was lacking in certain respects mo- for quite a while, Dean Cole understands the progress we’ve made.” tivated him to improve his lot. As lawyers, your ability to critically This also helps when meeting with alumni and community Iexamine your own positions, arguments and plans will be even members—they know Cole has been at USD School of Law for more helpful.” a long time and has a sincere interest in seeing the school succeed. Although lacking in bow-hunting skills, Dean Cole brings a rich Cole has already helped the law school’s progress. He has aided combination of skills and experience to his new position. Cole, a in reforming the grading system, modernizing the curriculum and scholar in criminal law and procedure, was named the new dean of providing more class choices for students. He has also hired a new the University of San Diego School of Law in April, after serving assistant dean of career services to assist students in finding em- as interim dean since July 2005. ployment after graduation. Cole’s prior experience in administration gave him insight into what life will now be like in the dean’s chair. Cole is the first dean to come from the USD law faculty in many years, and there are definite advantages coming from the inside.

Cole got a glimpse of a dean’s responsibilities even before his Cole has three main goals he hopes to accomplish as dean: year as interim dean by working for four years as the associate dean First, Cole says USD’s law school is a real asset to the city. But for former Dean Daniel B. Rodriguez. he believes the school can do a better job in making the commu- “Having worked closely with Professor Cole for the past several nity aware of all the school has to offer. “Our events on campus years, I have full confidence in his skills, judgment and ideas about benefit the community only to the extent that we make the com- making the law school great. With support from the University munity aware of them,” Cole said. and law school alumni, he will lead the school toward a higher Along the same lines, Cole wants to spotlight the law school’s level of excellence and reputation,” says Rodriguez. legal clinics, which provide free services to an underserved popu- Cole’s prior experience in administration gave him insight into lation in San Diego, a benefit of which many people in the com- what life will now be like in the dean’s chair. Cole is the first dean munity are not aware. to come from the USD law faculty in many years, and there are Second, Cole plans to continue to support the law school's definite advantages to coming from the inside. effort to attract a high caliber of students and faculty, and to support “I think I’ve come into the job with a better idea of what the them in the ways needed to help them to achieve at a high level. He faculty’s interests and ambitions are,” Cole said. “There is less says the law school is very well regarded as a strong general purpose transition time needed to formulate the plan for moving the law school, and overall, a sound place to get a legal education. school forward.” “The students are very strong, with credentials as high as they’ve As a dean who has spent a large portion of his career at USD’s ever been,” Cole says. “This translates into great accomplishments School of Law, Cole has an even greater motivation to improve when they graduate and become alumni. More and more alums are and expand the program. making big splashes in the legal world.” “Not only have I known my colleagues from the beginning, I can The law school’s tax program was recently ranked ninth in the also imagine what it will be like to return to the faculty one day nation, and the faculty is ranked twenty-third in how often its work when my duties as dean are over,” he says. “It gives an incentive to is cited. These are strong indicators of the promise of the faculty, build for the long haul because of my investment in the institution.” Cole says. “As the school becomes better known, the faculty is a tar- Michael Rider, an alumnus on the dean’s search committee, get of opportunity for other law schools, and we need to be in says as a tenured faculty member and administrator, Cole knows a position where the faculty is willing to resist these offers from

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 11 with alumni and students.” Alexander says Cole has been around long enough that he knows the strengths and weaknesses of the school’s faculty and staff well, and that Cole will be “difficult to fool.” Top Left: Cole accepts a gift from the Court of Appeals for the Armed Trevin Hartwell, director Forces during their visit in September 2005. Right: Dean Cole addresses of development and alumni the class of 2006 during the law school's commencement exercises. Middle Right: Cole draws raffle prizes at the law school's Student relations, said Cole has been Services Fair. His sense of humor makes him a favorite with students. well received by the alumni Bottom: Cole and 2006 School of Law commencement speaker Frances Fragos Townsend, President Bush’s homeland security advisor. community. “He is a very approachable person and is very likeable,” other schools, and keep it the great place it’s become,” Cole says. Hartwell says. “He has a sense Third, Cole hopes to increase the sense of attachment alumni of humor that comes out when have to the institution. he gives a speech or interacts “I mean this not just in a matter of financial support, but I would one on one, which makes him like alumni to have a willingness to participate in alumni events, an endearing character.” and in helping students to become integrated into the practice of Tom Fetter, chairman of law,” he says. the campaign committee and Cole confides that being a law professor is the best job in the member of the board of visi- world, sometimes it is a mistake to call it a job. tors, has interacted with Cole “To work in things you are interested in and to teach classes to in the campaign to double the size of the school’s endowment. students who are for the most part eager to learn what you ex- “Kevin is a very willing campaigner—he is willing to meet with pose them to... it’s a wonderful way to make a living.” prospects, communicate with them, explain the school’s needs and As dean, there are some aspects of the job that are administra- justifications and is a tremendous asset in this capital campaign,” tive and sometimes tedious, but also very rewarding. Fetter says. “He’s well-grounded and is a friendly, witty guy who “A lot of it is exciting and fun—a dean makes the case to the out- speaks and relates very well to people. He’s energetic, and I’m side world about why the faculty and students’ work is deserving of absolutely delighted with him.” their support. You can help people do the things you got into Colleagues agree that Cole’s interpersonal skills really set teaching to do in the first place,” Cole says. him apart. Cole enjoys the chance to represent the school and says it is a “Kevin has a good sense of humor. He communicates well with privilege to be in that kind of position. people and is candid and honest with them,” explains Jim Krause, In the almost twenty years that Cole has spent at USD’s School chairman of the board of visitors. “He’s the type of guy who is will- of Law, he has developed a solid reputation as a hardworking, in- ing to roll up his sleeves and get things done.” telligent and personable professor. He leads with enthusiasm and Cole has an excellent relationship with the students as well. has a knack for working well with others. “Dean Cole is almost always smiling. When you’re already in “I have known [Cole] since he joined the faculty and I was in- an environment that is designed to be stressful, seeing the dean volved in his recruitment,” says Larry Alexander, USD professor of with a smile on his face and an open, calm demeanor truly helps,” law. “He has high academic standards, which he applies both to says the University’s Student Bar Association President Angie classroom teaching and to scholarship. He is also good with num- Anastasopoulos. “He has an excellent grasp and understanding of bers and statistics, skills that are essential in a modern deanship. He what the students are going through and what the students need to has a quick wit, which I believe will make him successful in dealing be successful.”

12 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE USD Legal Clinics Celebrate Their 35th Anniversary Thirty-ﬁve years later Helping Students and Clients One at a Time USD law By Angie Jensen students and the community are still reaping the beneﬁts of the USD Legal Clinics.

Storefront of USD’s Crisis Clinic in 1973 At the University of San Diego School of Law, our students have Thirty-five years later USD law students and the community never been the type to sit and wait for the world to come to them. are still reaping the benefits of the USD Legal Clinics. When they believe in something, they are willing to go to astonish- “Student interest has never been stronger,” said Margaret ing lengths to make it a reality. That’s why it is not surprising to find Dalton, Esq., director of the University of San Diego School of out that in 1971 the USD Legal Clinics were started by a group of Law Legal Clinics. “We train close to 200 upper-division law stu- law students who passionately believed in helping others and fore- dents each year. These students learn the basics of ethical legal saw the benefit of this practical application to their legal education. practice with the close supervision of an attorney experienced in the area of practice. This type of experience is invaluable when our students compete in the job market.” In the Beginning In 1970, the Law Students Civil Rights Research Council (LSCRRC), a small law student organization at USD, worked with the USD Student Bar Association to develop a plan to bring legal services to the residents of Linda Vista and to integrate clinical work with the school’s curriculum. The Honorable Federico Castro ‘71, one of the students involved, says looking back at the time, “I thought it was a very good training instrument for people who wanted to be attorneys, and the services were rendered to those who could not afford them. It gave those people the opportunity to become involved with the legal system and gain an understanding of their rights.” The students knew they would have to make a strong case to get faculty approval for the program. At the time, clinical education wasn’t the accepted norm it is now. The California Legislature had only recently approved new rules allowing law students in good standing, who had completed 50 percent of their legal education, to become “certified” to practice law under the direct supervision of a member of the California bar. The Faculty Curriculum Committee met in October 1970 to consider the students’ plan. After review, the committee recommended that the faculty approve the proposal. At a faculty meeting, it was agreed to give students one credit for clinical work. By February 3, 1971, the law school’s new clinical education program opened the doors of the Linda Vista

Above: Professor Charlie Lynch supervises a students during a court appearance.

Below: June 1972, students meet together to discuss a case.

14 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Left: Jenna Leyton ‘07 worked with the Special Education Clinic helping students with disabilities receive the school services and accommodations they need.

Center and right: Rishi Khullar ‘07 works with the Small Claims Clinic helping clients prepare for their day in court.

Neighborhood Legal Service Center. It was temporarily located in and the law school agreed to start funding the clinical program. the Family Service Center near Kearny High School. Professor The program developed through 1972 and 1973 and had ex- John Sherry was appointed as the faculty advisor, and Alex panded to both civil and criminal law when Professor Rod Jones Landon ‘71 and Napoleon Jones ‘71 were the student coordina- was hired to head up the Criminal Clinic. tors. Operated by certified law students under the supervision of By 1977, the Legal Clinics were operating ten clinic field of- local volunteer attorneys, the clinic did legal work and commu- fices: Grossmont College Clinic, Indian Clinic, Women’s Legal nity relations projects, like the preparation of a consumer’s rights Center, Southeast Welfare Clinic, the original Linda Vista Clinic, guide and a landlord-tenant pamphlet. Mexican-American Advisory Committee Clinic, San Diego State Landon, now a member of the USD School of Law Board of Clinic, County Jail Legal Services Program, Art Law Clinic and Visitors and an adjunct professor, says that the students involved Southeast Immigration Clinic. at the time recognized it was an important part of their education. Since then, Professors Walter Heiser, Theresa Player and Susan “[The clinic] introduced me to procedures, the courts and the real Quinn have served as directors with Professor Margaret Dalton world. Medical education gets students involved in an internship serving as the current director. in their second year, and they have to complete a residency before The list of clinics has changed over the years, often adapting to they are set loose on the medical community. Theoretically, a law meet the needs of the San Diego community. student can graduate, pass the bar and get assigned to a felony For example, the Entrepreneurship Clinic came about when the case having never stepped into a courtroom.” San Diego economy was changing and more small businesses Before long, La Raza Legal Aid Center (or the Mexican- were starting up. Many of the startups didn’t have the corporate American Advisory Committee Clinic) in National City and the expertise or money needed to get some of their basic legal ques- Crisis Center in Southeast San Diego joined the list of clinics. tions answered. USD law Professor Richard “Corky” Wharton ‘71 was made stu- The Tax Clinic was formed with a grant from the Internal dent director of the Mexican-American Advisory Committee Revenue Service, making the clinic one of the first of its kind. In a Clinic. Wharton laughs about it now. According to him, he was “a move to be more customer-friendly, Congress allocated money to Yankee from Philadelphia” who didn’t speak a word of Spanish. help represent low-income individuals against the IRS in contro- Nevertheless, he threw himself wholeheartedly into the project. versies. Recently, the clinic’s outreach was so effective that the At this time, USD’s Clinical Education Program operated from National Taxpayers Advocates Conference has asked the clinic to a $1,000 grant from the Law Student Division of the American do a presentation on outreach at the next annual conference. Bar Association and a matching grant from USD Student Bar A couple of years ago the Immigration Clinic, already handling Association funds. Although supervised by Professor Sherry, the some of the more traditional cases, started seeing more asylum center was largely run by students. With almost 100 students par- cases. The clinic quickly adapted to meet the needs of refugees ticipating in the clinic, the law school realized that a director was from Somalia and other countries who were fleeing from religious needed. Professor Charlie Lynch was hired as the first director, persecution.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 15 Today: A first-class clinical program Clinics supervise about 90 students every semester and about 45 “USD has developed an excellent model that clearly demon- over the summer. Over the course of a year, the Legal Clinics strates how law school clinical programs can meet both the edu- close more than 500 cases. cational and service goals for students and their community,” said Although the list of clinics has changed over the years, the Legal Lorna Choy, senior grants administrator of the California State Clinic’s goals have remained the same: 1) Provide high-quality Bar Legal Services Trust Fund Program, during a recent site visit. practical training to law students, 2) Enable law students to develop “The enthusiasm of students and faculty is infectious, and the pro- expertise in specific practice areas, 3) Emphasize professional re- gram's sophistication is evident in its approach to both supervi- sponsibility and ethical practice, and 4) Serve lower income clients. sion and evaluation.” USD’s Legal Clinics are recognized as one of the most exten- Preparing Students sive and successful in the nation. Today the list of clinics includes Preparing students to practice law has always been one of the cen- Civil, Criminal, Entrepreneurship, Environmental, Immigration, tral focuses of the Legal Clinics. “Students are at the center of all Land Use, Mental Health, Perspectives in Criminal Justice, Small activities in the legal clinics,” says Dalton. “The professor/attor- Claims, Special Education and Tax. neys supervise, but the law students do the vast majority of the The Criminal, Land Use and Mental Health clinics are place- client representation, from initial intake to arguing in court or the ment clinics, which means that students are placed with other appropriate forum. Students make a large commitment of time agencies or entities for the practical portion of the clinical experi- when they are accepted into the Legal Clinics.” ence. However, they also attend a regular class making it different One of the biggest advantages for the students is the one-on- from a typical internship. The other clinics are client-based; one time they get with the professors or paralegals. Once the stu- meaning they work like any other law firm. dents graduate and start to practice law, they are unlikely to ever Dalton often calls the clinics “our small to midsize law firm.” get that kind of input and guidance again. They cover 11 areas of law and staff 12 adjunct and full-time pro- Rishi Khullar ’07 joined the Small Claims Clinic at the recom- fessors who act as supervising attorneys. On average, the Legal mendation of two of his friends who told him that it was a great

The clinic today: Margaret Dalton, Esq., meets with students to discuss current cases.

16 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE One of the biggest advantages for the way to get experience and that there was a lot of client interaction. students is the one-on-one time they get “The biggest way the clinic has prepared me to practice is by teaching me how to correspond with clients and better represent with the professors or paralegals. Once the them,” says Kullar. “With internships you don’t get a lot of the ex- posure or hands-on experience you get here.” students graduate and start to practice To get involved with the clinics, students apply and are interviewed like any other job. The competition is tough—there are law, they are unlikely to ever get that kind two to five applicants for each job opening. Once accepted, law students have to work four hours per week per academic unit. of input and guidance again. However, they often put in more when the case requires it. The class component takes an additional two to three hours a week. Class often involves case rounds. Much like a firm, the students meet around a conference table and go from person to per- ceed was very rewarding. It also helped cement her desire to pur- son talking about current cases. The professor is always there to sue a career in education and special education law. provide professional expertise, but is careful not to dominate the Beyond legal work, the clinics also organize a number of out- conversation, giving students a chance to give each other advice reach programs in an effort to better connect with underserved and feedback. populations like low-income individuals and English language learners. Last year, they hired an outreach coordinator whose Serving Low-Income Clients job is to be out in the community to get the Legal Clinics’ mes- By serving the legal needs of low-income clients in San Diego sage out. Students frequently participate in these outreach ac- County, the Legal Clinics support the university’s mission to tivities, giving them a chance to learn more about the needs of provide community outreach and service in a very direct way. the community and allowing them to apply what they learn in Just like in 1971, the law school is full of students who want to their classes. make a difference, and the clinics are an excellent chance for them to do so. For many law students, working with other peo- Looking Forward ple in the clinics is the first time they really capture the vision of Even with the 500 cases they close each year, the Legal Clinics what law can do. haven’t been able to help everyone who needs it. Dalton has Jenna Leyton ’07, who worked with the Special Education found that if you can’t pay for legal services there aren’t a lot of Clinic last spring semester, says the experience taught her that places to go for help. Although the clinics do very little advertis- “the need for affordable legal representation in low-income coming, they get a large number of calls. Unfortunately, after a couple munities is great, and without such representation, many individ- of months into each semester they are often forced to turn away uals would forego receiving services to which they are legally new cases. entitled and that vastly improve their lives.” Dalton carries the philosophy that “our accomplishments are During the semester, Leyton represented students and parents huge, but they are one client and one student at a time.” at Individualized Education Program meetings, conducted in- Looking ahead, Dalton’s goals center around securing the take interviews with potential clients, met with clients on a reg- resources they need to help more individuals. Her number one pri- ular basis, communicated via phone and letters with school ority is to find adequate office space for existing programs—ideally district representatives and created informational fliers for stu- with a bit of room to add additional clinics. She would also like to dents and parents. employ some first-year attorney associates to assist the supervising Leyton recalls helping one student who was frequently absent attorneys and students. Because of their small attorney-student from school due to a medical condition. This made it especially dif- ratio, they have had to turn away many students and clients. ficult for the student to make up her work. Leyton was able to help In the spirit of those students who started the program in the her gain admission to an alternative high school that could give her 1970s, there is a sign up in the Legal Clinics office that reads more individualized attention and was better suited to her needs. “never reject the cause of the oppressed.” Leyton found that helping students with disabilities receive the Talking to the students and staff, you find that this is a very im- school services and accommodations necessary for them to suc- portant motto. For them, it is all about helping one more person.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 17 faculty essays

BY MIKE RAPPAPORT

Professor of Law

Justice Breyer’s Active Liberty

n his book Active Liberty, Justice Stephen using a “purposivist” approach—i.e., that cal indirection that portrays Breyer’s own IBreyer attempts to develop an alterna- judges should read constitutional provi- judicial activism as one of judicial restraint. tive to the originalist theory of interpreta- sions based on their general purposes and At ﬁrst, Breyer’s jurisprudential approach tion that has received so much attention in should determine whether a law promotes seems plausible. But as one examines it recent years. Rather than interpret the these purposes based on their real world more closely, serious problems emerge. Constitution based on its original mean- consequences. Breyer claims that such an First, what justifies privileging political ing, as originalists like Justice Scalia might, approach demonstrates judicial humility. participation over other values? Breyer Breyer argues that the Constitution should Unfortunately, given Breyer’s previous shows that the Framers valued political be interpreted to further political partici- works, one would have expected a more participation when writing the Constitu- pation—the active liberty of the ancients thoughtful book that honestly came to tion, but the Framers also prized other val- as opposed to the modern liberty to do as grips with both the benefits and costs of ues. They therefore chose to limit popular one pleases. non-originalist interpretation. Instead, participation in the election of Senators Breyer also maintains that the Consti- Active Liberty comes across as an assertion and the President and to prevent the legis- tution (and statutes) should be interpreted without support, and as a work of rhetori- lature from abridging individual rights.

18 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Because the Framers embraced multiple Breyer’s focus on general purposes al- representatives—either through statutes or values, Breyer needs to explain what justi- lows judges to select the values that the through constitutional amendments. Even fies the preeminence of political participa- Constitution furthers and his focus on if a statute or constitutional provision is tion, other than the fact that he deems it modern real world consequences allows currently unpopular and needs revision, more important. But Breyer provides no them to assert how laws will in fact oper- the Court’s decision to update it will de- explanation. ate. With control over the facts and values, prive the people of the opportunity to do Similar problems arise when Breyer Breyer’s “active” judge has virtually bound- the updating and they are likely to update moves to interpreting particular constitu- less authority over the Constitution’s con- it in a different way than the Court does. tional clauses. Breyer believes that judges tent. Thus, it is no surprise that Breyer’s Far from defending the broad discretion should focus on the general purposes of tour through the Constitution—from he would give to judges, Breyer seems to provisions. But the general purposes of a affirmative action, to campaign finance, to be in denial about it. Breyer actually claims clause are often highly disputed matters, federalism, to separation of church and that, as compared to originalism (which as there is no clear way of determining state—only reaches destinations that tellingly he mistakenly refers to as “literal- what these purposes were. For example, Breyer appears to endorse politically. ism”), his approach does not significantly when discussing the constitutionality of Interestingly, Breyer’s tour fails to make increase the subjectivity of judicial deci- affirmative action, Breyer claims that the one important stop—his majority opinion sions. Given the enormous power that purpose of the Equal Protection Clause for the Court in Stenberg v. Carhart, which Breyer confers on judges, this is astound- (and the Civil War Amendments gener- struck down a ban on partial birth abor- ing. Moving almost into the realm of self- ally) was to allow blacks to “participate tions. One might argue that Stenberg is parody, Breyer illustrates the alleged fully with equal rights in the democratic inconsistent with Breyer’s active liberty restraints on judges with his opinions from political community.” purposivist approach, because the opinion recent Establishment Clause cases. In two But the Equal Protection Clause is at protects what seems to be a personal deci- opinions that were so subjective that no least as plausibly viewed as having a differ- sion unrelated to political participation. other justice agreed with both of them, ent purpose—either establishing color- But perhaps Breyer can avoid this inconsis- Breyer concluded that the Ten Command- blind laws or guaranteeing to minorities tency. Breyer might argue that terminating ments could be placed on the grounds of full civil rights (but not special political pregnancies is necessary for women to the Texas State Capital, but not inside a rights)—neither of which would support work and thereby to participate fully in Kentucky state courthouse. his justification for affirmative action. politics. Alternatively, Breyer never says It is one thing to argue that judicial dis- Again, Breyer does not explain why his that active liberty is the only important cretion is necessary, because the political chosen purpose is the correct one. (And value. So he might argue that another pur- process suffers from maladies and there- neither would his opponents using the pose of the Fourteenth Amendment is to fore more powerful judges are needed. very same rationale.) protect individual rights, which in the That position, although mistaken, at least Breyer also argues that one should de- modern world requires giving those rights confronts the issues forthrightly. It is an- termine whether a law promotes or retards a modern interpretation. In other words, other thing for Breyer to deny that his these general purposes based on its mod- Breyer’s approach might be so flexible that activist approach empowers courts and ern real world consequences, not on what there is no decision, including Stenberg, that to make that approach part of his argu- the Framers believed would have fur- it can’t be made consistent with. ment for furthering political participation. thered their purposes. But the conse- Having articulated this extremely flexi- Breyer’s arguments here suggest that he ei- quences of laws are hotly contested. ble interpretive approach, one would ex- ther is oblivious to the fact that he is im- While Breyer assumes that affirmative pect that Breyer would defend it against posing his will on the nation or does not action will allow blacks to more fully par- objections. It is here where Breyer’s book is believe that he seriously needs to justify ticipate in political life, opponents of affir- particularly unsuccessful. One major prob- his actions. In neither case are his actions mative action credibly maintain that it lem with the vast discretion that Breyer worthy of a Supreme Court Justice. renders blacks less influential by diminish- confers on judges is that it is inconsistent ing their accomplishments and creating with the active liberty that is the primary Originally published on December 19, 2005, in greater racial animosity. Once again, concern of his book. Judicial activism is TCS Daily. Breyer gives no reason why his view generally thought to undermine democ- should prevail, except that he, naturally, racy, because it deprives the people of thinks it is the correct view. their ability to set policy through their

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 19 BY DAVID MCGOWAN

Professor of Law

The Continuing Convergence of Patent Misuse and Antitrust Doctrine

he patent misuse doctrine provides an The licensees argued that Philips mis- a per se doctrine is to condemn certain Tequitable defense to claims of patent used its patents by tying them together in practices as soon as they are spotted, with- infringement. Under the doctrine, if a de- the package license. Their theory was that out investigating their economic effects. fendant shows that a patentee has effec- some of the patents in the package were The phrase does not really mean that any- tively expanded the scope or term of a not necessary for making discs, so that the more in antitrust cases, however, and Philips patent, courts refuse to enforce the patent package tied a license for unnecessary shows that the same is true for misuse. (at all—against any defendant), until the patents to a license for the necessary one. Philips pointed out that the cases con- patentee stops the misuse and remedies The ITC agreed that Philips had misused demning tying as per se misuse involved its effects. the patents, and Philips appealed to the ties between products. The classic cases The misuse doctrine combines elements Federal Circuit. involved mimeograph machines and ink, of patent and antitrust law, so it The Federal Circuit reversed. It ac- or salt deposition machines and salt, or provides a window on current cepted the characterization of the movies a theater wanted to show and thinking about innovation movies it did not. In contrast, Philips only and competition policy. required that licensees take a nonexclu- The doctrine has changed sive license to all patents in the significantly over time, and package. Such a license is just a recent Federal Circuit mis- a promise by a patentee not use case, Philips v. International to sue for infringement; it is Trade Commission, provides a good ex- not a use requirement. ample of the direction of these changes. Ergo what? Old-style an- If the trend continues, antitrust principles titrust and misuse cases rea- will largely swallow the misuse doctrine. soned that the evil of such arrangements was that a buyer PHILIPS V. ITC AND MISUSE BY TYING was forced to take a something Philips holds patents for making recordable the buyer did not want. Forcing was and re-writable compact discs. It licenses package license the relevant wrong. On this theory, those patents to disc manufacturers, but as a tie, and it upheld the ITC’s finding Philips’ point was pointless, because the will only license the patents as a package. It that Philips has market power. That find- licensees were forced to take licenses will not license only those patents a partic- ing meant 35 U.S.C. § 271(d)(5), which they did not want. Modern cases, how- ular manufacturer wants, nor will it offer a says tying is not misuse unless the patentee ever, worry less about forcing than that lower rate to licensees who claim to need has market power in the patented (tying) a tie might foreclose competition in the fewer patents than are in the package. product, did not exempt Philips from the market for the tied product. Economically, Certain disc manufacturers signed package misuse defense. the worry is that a tie might raise the costs licenses in the late 1990s, but soon stopped This finding put Philips at risk, because of rivals, who might have to pay more for paying license fees to Philips. Philips filed a Supreme Court precedent in both misuse distribution outlets, or might not have claim before the ITC to stop importation and antitrust cases refers to tying as unlaw- enough demand left in the market to of CDs made by these firms. ful per se. One might think the purpose of achieve economies of scale in production.

20 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE The point of this argument was that licensee would not face infringement suits distrust of patent “monopolies,” a formalist package licenses do not present the same from Philips. construction of the Patent Act and, on the foreclosure risk as ties between products. For these reasons, the Federal Circuit antitrust side, an emphasis on rivalry Philips was right about that, but the argu- declined to treat the package license under among firms rather than efficiency as the ment needs another step. If the package a rule of per se illegality. That left the rule relevant goal of the law. forced licensees to spend more than they of reason, under which courts ask whether Formalist misuse analysis, and rivalry- would if they had to license only the nec- a restriction restrains trade unreasonably, based antitrust analysis, was relatively in- essary patent, then some competitors all things considered. The ITC had found, different to economic effects. It did not might be foreclosed from licensing their as an alternative to its per se analysis, that really matter whether a patentee actually own technologies because licensees the package license was unlawful under had market power in a tying product, for might be reluctant to license an alterna- this standard as well. Citing the legal ob- example, and certainly not whether it had tive technology in addition to one they jections mentioned above and its reversal any realistic hope of monopolizing the had already paid for. There was no con- of some factual findings that supported the tied product market. The point was that

ANTITRUST SHIFTED GEARS IN THE 1970S. THE STORY IS COMPLEX, BUT IN A NUTSHELL THE SUPREME COURT’S JURISPRUDENCE CREATED SUCH ECONOMIC LOSSES (IN TERMS OF GAINS THAT COULD NOT BE REALIZED) THAT FIRMS KEPT TESTING THE PRECEDENTS.

crete evidence of such foreclosure, but ITC’s rule of reason analysis, the Federal independent rivals should not be forced to the licensees did seem to think they could Circuit reversed this finding as well. do things they did not want to do. get better prices if they could license in- During this period, courts either did not dividual patents than if they had to license THE EVOLUTION OF understand or were actually hostile to the the package. THE MISUSE DOCTRINE economic benefits of the condemned The Federal Circuit rejected this lower- Philips reflects a trend in the Federal practices. Ties might meter uses and facil- price argument. It reasoned that so long as Circuit’s misuse jurisprudence. That trend itate price discrimination; resale price any of the patents were truly necessary to is likely to continue, and in a moment I’ll maintenance might ensure a minimum manufacture discs, Philips could extract offer some conjectures about where the level of service and prevent free-riding by from licensees the full amount they would law is headed. To put that subject in per- retailers; a long royalty stream might be be willing to pay for the ability to make spective, however, I’ll first say a word just a method of financing. All of these CDs. Whatever that amount was, it would about where it has been. practices are at least potentially efficient, not go up just because manufacturing read Philips focuses on the probable economic and probably produce net benefits in on four or five patents, and it would not go effects of the package license rather than many if not most cases. That was not rele- down so long as any one patent had to be on the fact that it was a package. The focus vant during this period, unless a court licensed. Combined with the first point, on substance over form is the most signifi- considered that efficiency gains made this argument implied that the package li- cant change in both antitrust and misuse conduct worse (because it was more cense neither raised the licensees’ prices, law over the past 30 years. threatening to small firms). nor foreclosed competitors. During the period following adoption of Antitrust shifted gears in the 1970s. The Having rebutted the supposed harms of the Clayton Act in 1914, and running story is complex, but in a nutshell the the licenses, Philips also pointed out that through roughly 1974, both misuse and Supreme Court’s jurisprudence created the package produced competitive benefits antitrust decisions commonly declared such economic losses (in terms of gains in the form of lower transaction costs. The that certain transaction structures were that could not be realized) that firms kept package eliminated the need to argue simply illegal-unlawful per se. These in- testing the precedents. This process kept about whether a licensee’s manufacturing cluded ties, restrictions on resale prices, judges focused on the costs of the doc- method read on one patent but not others. and, in the misuse context, royalties ex- trines. Practical people like judges do not The package thus created the efficiency of tending beyond the patent term. Such de- like to create costs, so the Court’s doc- one-stop shopping and the certainty that a cisions were consistent with a general trines were unstable. The key cases in

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 21 this shift were the 1974 General Dynamics is no doubt that the Federal Circuit is cor- restriction as pertaining to one product decision regarding mergers, and the 1977 rectly reading the current trends in compe- rather than two, a further encroachment GTE Sylvania decision regarding vertical tition policy. on the per se concept. nonprice restraints. Second, the trend toward paring back GTE Sylvania said explicitly that the APOSSIBLE FUTURE rules adopted in the heyday of rivalry- Court would not be guided by the form of FOR ANTITRUST AND MISUSE based antitrust analysis and formalist mis- a restriction but would look instead to its Against this background, it is easy to see use analysis is desirable and should economic effects, analyzed under the rule that Philips is part of a trend that probably continue. Philips exemplifies the trend by of reason. This general trend continues to will continue. Here are a few specific exam- distinguishing ties between patents from this day in antitrust. It was in evidence ples of how Philips exemplifies the trend, and ties between products. The Federal Circuit most recently in the Supreme Court’s some recommendations for future cases. can continue drawing such economically Illinois Toolworks decision, which did away First, Philips shows that per se illegality is sensible distinctions. The Supreme Court with the presumption that an intellectual not what it used to be. The point of the per should overrule the cases that created the property right confers market power. se rule in antitrust was to identify a set of remaining categories of per se misuse. The change in misuse came somewhat practices that are so obviously anticompet- Tying, resale price maintenance and ex- later and, more significantly, has occurred itive that courts do not need to waste their tended royalty periods all have legitimate, at the Federal Circuit rather than the time on full-blown rule of reason analysis in pro-competitive explanations. They should Supreme Court. The key case was the order to condemn the practice. In a per se not be subject to a per se rule. Cases in 1986 Windsurfing opinion, where the court world, a tie is illegal, no matter how small. which such explanations do not hold up

THE REAL QUESTION IS WHETHER COMPETITION IN THE TIED PRODUCT MARKET IS THREATENED, SO AN ANTITRUST PLAINTIFF OR INFRINGEMENT DEFENDANT ALLEGING MISUSE SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO SHOW A DANGEROUS PROBABILITY OF MONOPOLIZING THE TIED PRODUCT MARKET.

defined misuse as conduct extending the Outside the paradigm case of price- can be dealt with under the rule of reason. scope or term of a patent with anticompeti- fixing among competitors, however, courts Third, in both antirust cases and misuse tive effect. The italicized language was new and Congress are loading up “per se” cases cases based on tying, the Court (and the and was not found in the Supreme Court with elements that begin to blur into rule Federal Circuit, to the extent it can) should opinion the Federal Circuit cited for that of reason analysis. Both Section 271(d), in provide more explicit guidance regarding proposition. the misuse context, and the Supreme what effect a restriction must have on a Nevertheless, since the 1992 Mallinckrodt Court’s Jefferson Parish opinion, in the an- tied product market in order for the re- decision, which cites GTE Sylvania and fol- titrust context, require some showing that striction to be unlawful. In particular, the lows that case’s analytical approach, the the party implementing the tie has market Court should harmonize tying and at- Federal Circuit has interpreted misuse doc- power in the tying product market. That tempted monopolization law by applying trine to bring it into line with modern an- requirement undercuts the notion that cer- the attempted monopolization standard to titrust cases. The result is that other than tain restrictions are always illegal. tying claims. three restrictions that remain misuse per se In addition, one cannot have a tie unless Currently, a plaintiff alleging a tying by reason of Supreme Court precedent there are two products. Analysis of this claim must only show that the tie affects (and one of those, tying, is qualified by question provides further opportunity for some significant amount of commerce in Section 271(d)(5)), and a few examples of efficiency-based reasoning. The key here, the tied product market, which is not a conduct that fall within a safe harbor, as the D.C. Circuit pointed out in its particularly meaningful standard. In con- patent misuse analysis is now antitrust rule Microsoft merits opinion, is that the two- trast, to state a claim for attempted mo- of reason analysis. There is some risk to product analysis embeds some degree of nopolization a plaintiff must show that this strategy, because the Supreme Court analysis of the efficiency of the alleged tie. there is a dangerous probability that the has not overruled the misuse opinions the Where efficiency gains are very high, the defendant will monopolize the market for Federal Circuit is whittling away, but there law recognizes that fact by treating the the relevant product.

22 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE This difference in standards makes no is to place form over substance, in contra- should be allowed to defend against their sense because the economic risk in each diction of the approach set out in GTE own alleged infringement by claiming that case is essentially the same—competition Sylvania. If there is any merit to a tying the patentee is harming someone else. is threatened in the market for the tied claim, then the “contract” will be forced on These procedural reforms would be consis- product, which may well be the market in buyers or licensees. In substance the con- tent with the notion of tying misuse to which monopolization is attempted—and duct is the unilateral act of forcing not, as economic effects (and with the antitrust the same course of conduct may support in price-fixing, a truly bilateral act. The injury doctrine). If that is what we care both claims. In the Microsoft litigation, for real question is whether competition in the about, the law should focus on whether an example, the government alleged that tied product market is threatened, so an act causes harm, not whether a patentee is Microsoft attacked the browser market by antitrust plaintiff or infringement defen- a bad actor. adopting certain technological measures dant alleging misuse should be required to I would like to think these recommenda- that made it hard to separate Internet show a dangerous probability of monopo- tions are reliable predictions as well. As ei- Explorer (IE) from Windows, as well as by lizing the tied product market. ther or both Neils Bohr and Yogi Berra employing license restrictions that pre- Fourth, misuse remedies should be tai- said, however, predictions are hard, espe- vented OEMs from removing IE. The for- lored and standing requirements should be cially about the future. So I’ll let my rec- mer conduct was charged under Section 2 introduced. A ﬁnding of misuse should sus- ommendations stand at that, and hope of the Sherman Act because it was “unilat- pend enforcement of a patent only against they are right. They are at least a logical eral,” while the latter was charged as a tie the party that has demonstrated misuse, extension of the functionalist trend in an- because it involved a license. and no party who is not subject to a re- titrust and misuse, and the ever-greater To treat a tie as a Section One contract striction allegedly constituting misuse convergence between the two.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 23 faculty footnotes LAURA M. S. BEREND completed her two-year term as president of the San Diego Psych-Law Society in December 2005. She coordinated and co-moderated “Investi- gate Your Case: CSI for Lawyers” presented on January 28, 2006, to approximately 200 attendees at the Joan B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice. This was one of a series of annual or semi- annual seminars funded since 1991 by a grant from Community Defenders, Inc. The San Diego Psych-Law Society co-sponsored this year’s event.

❖ ❖ ❖ LAURA M. S. BEREND

ROY L. BROOKS completed the third edition of his casebook, Civil Rights Litigation: Cases and Perspectives (Carolina Academic Press). The paperback edition of his monograph, Atonement and Forgiveness (University of California Press), was released last winter. His book, Structures of Judicial Decision Making from Legal Formalism to Critical Theory (Carolina Academic Press, 2002), gained attention during last fall’s Supreme Court conﬁrmation hearings of John Roberts. Brooks presented an academic paper at Yale Law School in the Levinson Auditorium and gave a campus-wide speech at Brown Univer- sity. He has appeared in debates at the University of Kentucky and the Uni- versity of Houston, as well as on a panel discussing the issue of reparations sponsored by the New York Historical Society. Brooks has also given interviews on radio, appeared at book signings in San Francisco and New York City and was seen on C-SPAN. Locally, Brooks gave a speech at the Martin Luther King Library and participated in a panel discussion at Thomas Jefferson Law School.

24 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Criminal Procedure Stories (Carol Steiker, ed. ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ 2006). His contribution was “Mapp v. STEVEN HARTWELL presented “Humor, YALE KAMISAR and his co-authors Ohio: The First Shot Fired in the Warren Anger, Rules & Ritual,” in November at published in summer 2005 the 11th edi- Court’s Criminal Procedure Revolution.” the Sixth International Clinical Con- tion of Modern Criminal Procedure (and its Kamisar participated in a criminal ference held in Lake Arrowhead, Calif. spin-offs) (West, 2005), the most widely procedure conference at Harvard Law and sponsored jointly by UCLA and the used casebook in its ﬁeld. This marks the School on April 21-22, 2006. He also was University of London. It will appear in 13 most editions of a casebook ever pub- the keynote speaker at the annual Los

ROY L. BROOKS STEVEN HARTWELL YALE KAMISAR ADAM J. KOLBER

Clinical Law Review (2007). The article ex- lished by a founding author or co-author Angeles Criminal Law Section dinner on plores the role of humor and anger as so- in the history of West Publishing Co. May 4, 2006. cial cues in regulating values informally, This May, Kamisar and another set of ❖ ❖ ❖ the role of anger in moving values to for- co-authors published the 10th edition mal status when such values are incorpo- of Constitutional Law (West). This will ADAM J. KOLBER was invited to pres- rated into formal rules and then the role make him the founding author or co- ent a paper in February 2006, at an inter- of ritual as a vehicle for conveying formal author of the second most published edi- national conference on “Law, Mind and rules with affective power. tions of a casebook ever published in the Brain” at University College London. West Publishing history. His research concerns the legal and ethi- ❖ ❖ ❖ In the fall of 2005, Kamisar published cal implications of emerging technolo- WALTER HEISER published the second “How Earl Warren’s Twenty-Two Years in gies to dampen traumatic memories. In edition of his casebook titled California Law Enforcement Affected His Work as September 2005, he spoke on a related Civil Procedure (LexisNexis, 2005). It ex- Chief Justice,” 3 Ohio State Journal of topic at Hofstra Law School and at St. amines the important doctrines, rules and Criminal Law 11 (2005), an article which Louis University School of Law. In addi- policies that deﬁne civil litigation in the discusses how the seeds of Miranda and tion, in December 2005, he was inter- California courts. He also published an other famous cases may have been from viewed by the Maryland Daily Record for article titled “Relation Back of Amended Warren’s own experiences as a crime- the article “Brave Neuro World” on how Complaints: The California Courts Should busting district attorney for Alameda advances in the neurosciences may affect Adopt a More Pragmatic Approach,” 44 County. In 2006, Kamisar published our understanding of criminal law. Santa Clara Law Review 643 (2005) and “Dickerson v. United States: The Case ❖ ❖ ❖ completed another article titled “Forum that Disappointed Miranda’s Critics— Non Conveniens and Choice of Law: and Then Its Supporters.” It appeared in a DAVID S. LAW presented papers at Boalt The Impact of Applying Foreign Law in collection of essays on the work of the Hall, NYU, the University of Southern Transnational Tort Actions,” 51 Wayne late chief justice, The Rehnquist Legacy California, the University of Texas at Law Review (forthcoming April, 2006). He (Craig Bradley, ed. 2006). He also con- Austin and Stanford. Together with also received the Professor of the Year tributed a chapter to a new book about Professor Larry Solum of the University (Thorsnes Award) for 2005. famous criminal procedure cases called of Illinois, he also presented a paper on

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 25 the subject of judicial appointment grid- ❖ ❖ ❖ FACULTY FOOTNOTES lock and the nuclear option at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political BERT LAZEROW was elected chair of the Science Association in Washington, D.C. University Senate for 2005-06. He also He recently published an article in directed the USD programs in Florence Judicature titled “Judicial Ideology and the and Paris this summer. Decision to Publish: Voting and Publi- ❖ ❖ ❖ cation Patterns in Ninth Circuit Asylum Cases.” His forthcoming article in the ORLY LOBEL’S article on occupational Georgia Law Review, titled “The Paradox of safety and reform policies at OSHA, Omnipotence: Courts, Constitutions, and “Interlocking Regulatory and Industrial Commitments,” takes an interdisciplinary Relations: The Governance of Workplace look at the problem of sovereign commit- Safety,” was published in the Administra- ment-making, which lies at the intersec- tive Law Review and is the recipient of the tion of political science, economics and 2005 HLS Irving Oberman Memorial constitutional theory. Law also continues Award for best paper on a current legal to write on the subjects of federal judicial issue in law and governance. Lobel’s

DAVID S. LAW BERT LAZEROW ORLY LOBEL

appointment and behavior, and he was review essay, “The Four Pillars of Work interviewed by the National Law Journal on Law,” is forthcoming in the Michigan Law the failed nomination of Harriet Miers to Review. An earlier Michigan Law Review the Supreme Court and by the ABA essay, “Orchestrated Experimentalism in Journal on recent popular and political the Regulation of Work” was reprinted in challenges to judicial independence. a new casebook Employment Discrimination Law will act as editor of the Journal of Law: Cases, Problems and Critical Perspectives Contemporary Legal Issues in 2006. The (Prentice Hall, 2005). Other recent publi- forthcoming volume collects a series cations include: “Sustainable Capitalism of papers organized around the theme or Ethical Transnationalism: Off-Shore of positive political theory and the law. Production and Economic Development,” He also continues to review manu- forthcoming, Journal of Asian Economics scripts for the Law & Society Review. Most (2006); “Beyond Experimentation: The recently, he was selected to present a Case of Occupational Health and Safety paper on the subject of globalization Administrative Governance in the United and constitutional law at the Hawaii States,” forthcoming in New Governance International Conference on the Social and Constitutionalism in Europe and the United Sciences this summer. States (Hart Publishing: Oxford, UK,

26 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE 2006); “Making Consumption Decisions mental enforcement. McAllister also water-quality agencies” (San Diego Union- By Following Personal Rules,” in Inside presented her research on environ- Tribune, February 17, 2006). Consumption: Frontiers of Research on Con- mental enforcement in Brazil to the In January 2006, Minan delivered a sumer Motives, Goals and Desires (Routledge University of California at San Diego’s paper titled “General Industrial Storm Press, 2005) (co-authored with On Amir Environment Resource Group. McAllister Water Permitting and the Construction & Dan Ariely). is currently working on an article about Industry: What Does the Clean Water In October 2005, Lobel gave talks at compliance and enforcement in emis- Act Require” at a national storm water Georgetown Law Center and at Thomas sions trading programs in the United symposium held at Chapman University. Jefferson School of Law. The presenta- States, and she was invited to present He will be contributing a law review arti- tions were titled “Sleeping with the on this topic at the 2006 International cle on the same subject later this year. In Enemy or Effective Public Management?: Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of March, Minan presented a paper titled Government/Industry Cooperation for Environmental Law. “Storm Water Permitting and Enforce- Promoting Workers’ Rights.” Other ment: Alice Visits Wonderland?” to the ❖ ❖ ❖ presentations included the California ABA Section of State and Local Govern- Higher Education Consortium at USD in JOHN (JACK) H. MINAN received the ment. In May, he delivered a paper titled February 2006, and the Conference on San Diego Citizen Watershed Monitor- “Federal Clean Water Act Considerations Entrepreneurship and Human Rights ing Consortium Award in October 2005, and the Problem of Once Upon a Farm” for his “outstand- to the ABA Section of Real Property, ing and continuous Probate and Trust Law. support educating He recently published two law review the public on articles. “Municipal Separate Storm the importance of Sewer System (MS4) Regulation Under clean water.” In the Federal Clean Water Act: The Role December, 2005, of Water Quality Standards” was pub- he was selected lished by our law review in 42 San Diego for a 2006-07 Law Review 1215 (2005). His article, University Prof- “The Clash Between Farmers and the essor award that Endangered Species Act: Whose Water Is recognizes “out- It?” was published this past fall by the LESLEY MCALLISTER JOHN H. MINAN standing, balanced, University of Missouri-Kansas City in 37 cumulative contri- Urban Lawyer 371 (2005). His opinion at Fordham University in August 2005. butions supporting the mission and goals piece on “Congress’ Power Over the She also participated at a workshop on of USD.” Environment,” which previewed two the International Criminal Court at the Minan is active in the area of commu- Clean Water Act cases heard by the Institute for Peace & Justice at USD in nity service. He was recently re-elected Supreme Court of the United States in December 2005. vice chair of the San Diego River February, recently appeared in the San Conservancy, a state agency created by Diego Union-Tribune (January 18, 2006). ❖ ❖ ❖ the California legislature for the purpose ❖ ❖ ❖ LESLEY MCALLISTER contributed a of acquiring and managing lands in the chapter to Environmental Issues in Latin San Diego River area. In February 2006, GRANT H. MORRIS co-authored a America and the Caribbean (Springer, he was re-elected to a sixth consecutive book chapter titled “Informed Consent 2005), an interdisciplinary treatment of one-year term as the chairman of the Cali- and Competency: Legal and Ethical the most salient environmental prob- fornia Water Board, San Diego Region. Issues” (with David Naimark, M.D., lems in the region. Her chapter details The Water Board administers and enforces Ansar M. Haroun, M.D., & Laura Dunn, the work of Brazilian prosecutors in the Federal Clean Water Act as well as the M.D.), which was published in Current enforcing environmental laws and ana- California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Clinical Neurology: Psychiatry for Neurologists lyzes the effectiveness of having prose- Act. It was recently identiﬁed in a news (Dilip Jeste, M.D. & Joseph Friedman, cutors rather than regulatory agencies article on water boards “as a model en- M.D. eds, Humana Press, 2005). Morris’s take primary responsibility for environ- forcer within California’s network of nine contribution to the chapter traces the

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 27 common law development of the doc- atrists and psychologists, he found FACULTY FOOTNOTES trine of informed consent from its ori- that in cases in which the defendant gins in the tort of battery to its thinks rationally but acts irrationally transformation into the tort of negli- or thinks irrationally but acts rationally, gence. He then discusses competency as forensic evaluators do not assess compe- a requirement for giving or withholding tency competently. He concluded by of- informed consent, focusing primarily on fering three recommendations to assure the competency issue as it relates to in- that the issue of competency to stand trial dividuals with mental disorders who is properly assessed. have been civilly committed and who On January 10, 2006, Morris spoke at wish to assert a right to refuse treatment a program on forensic psychiatry issues with psychotropic medication. presented by the San Diego County Con- Morris also co-authored an article titled tinuing Medical Education Committee to “Informed Consent in Psychopharmacol- San Diego County mental health profes- ogy” (with Ansar M. Haroun, M.D. & David sionals. His speech was titled “The Right Naimark, M.D.), which was published in 25 to Refuse Treatment: A Legal Perspective.” Journal of Clinical Psycho- pharmacology 403 (2005). In the article, Professor Morris discusses the development of the law’s recognition of the patient’s right to medical self-determination and exceptions to patient autonomous judgment. Morris also authored a book chapter titled “Civil Law: Structures and Procedures,” which will be published this year in International Handbook GRANT MORRIS MICHAEL RAMSEY on Psychopathic Disorders and the Law (Alan Felthous, M.D. & Henning ❖ ❖ ❖ Sass, M.D., eds., John Wiley & Sons, forthcoming, 2006). In this chapter, MICHAEL RAMSEY was named Herzog Morris introduces psychiatrists and other Endowed Scholar for 2005-06. He pub- non law-trained readers to law and law- lished “Torturing Executive Power,” making in the United States using exam- 93 Georgetown Law Journal 1213 (2005), ples that demonstrate how various legal critiquing the constitutional analysis of principles are applied to issues involving the Bush administration’s so-called persons with psychopathic disorders. “torture memos,” and reviewed Robert On November 10, 2005, Morris pre- Badinter and Stephen Breyer’s book Judges sented the Mark A. Nordenberg Lecture in Contemporary Democracy for the Journal of in Law and Psychiatry at the University of Legal Education (55 Journal of Legal Education Pittsburgh. The program was presented 305 (2005)). He gave scholarly presenta- by the School of Law and the Center for tions at a number of leading law schools Bioethics and Health Law at the Uni- including Harvard, Georgetown and versity of Pittsburgh. His speech was Columbia, and spoke at the workshop titled “Is Competency to Stand Trial on teaching constitutional law at the Assessed Competently?” Based on a study American Association of Law Schools Morris conducted of 273 forensic psychi- Annual Meeting in Washington, D.C. He

28 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE is currently working on a book on the sponded to these comments. Scalia also The Commercial Code of Mexico (Thompson- constitutional law of foreign affairs with published a review of Law’s Quandary in West, Toronto, Canada, Winter 2006). publication expected in 2007. the journal, First Things. In addition, Vargas presented “Assess- Also in October, Smith commented ing the Mexican Vote Abroad” at the ❖ ❖ ❖ on a paper by Oxford University Prof- Transborder Institute at USD in the Joan MICHAEL RAPPAPORT published two essor Timothy Endicott at a conference B. Kroc Institute for Peace & Justice articles in law reviews: “The Original at Princeton University honoring the Auditorium on February 2, 2006. He also Meaning of the Recess Appointments work of Oxford natural law philosopher gave a lecture titled “A Wall Across the Clause,” 52 UCLA Law Review 1487 (2005) John Finnis. The paper and comment Border? A Mexican Perspective,” for the and “The Judicial Filibuster, the Median will be published in the American Journal of 2006 Culture Clash Lecture Series at USD Senator and the Countermajoritarian Jurisprudence. on February 21, 2006. The next day he Difficulty,” The Supreme Court Review (forth- In November, Smith presented a paper gave a power point presentation at the coming, 2006, with John McGinnis). He discussing Thomas More’s views on con- School of Law on “The California Gray also published a book review of Justice science before the first annual conference Whale: Legal and Environmental Aspects,” Breyer’s Active Liberty in the web magazine of the Thomas More Historical Society and saw publication in the San Diego Union- TCS Daily (12/19/2005). In addition, at the University of Dallas. Tribune of his opinion editorial, “Americans, Mexico and Real Estate.” He was one of only five honored at The Presence of Cuidad Juarez in International Law, a special event organized by the Department of Legal Sciences at the Autonomous University of Cuiduad Juarez to recognize leading Chihuahua natives in Mexico. That event took place on March 10, 2006, at the university’s School of Law audito- MICHAEL RAPPAPORT STEVEN SMITH JORGE VARGAS rium in Mexico. Vargas also took part in the Rappaport presented a paper at the As chair of the AALS’s Jurisprudence USD School of Law Film Series Festival Federalist Society Faculty Colloquium in section, Smith organized and moderated by making comments on immigration law Washington, D.C., January 2006, titled the jurisprudence panel at the national problems between the United States and “The Case for the Judicial Filibuster, Debate conference in Washingon, D.C. He Mexico as an introduction to the film, on the Judicial Filibuster,” and spoke to also presented a paper, titled “The “The Gatekeeper.” USD alumni as part of a CLE Program on Jurisdictional Establishment Clause: A Judicial Appointments (October 2005). Reappraisal,” on the panel of the Law and Religion section. ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ STEVEN SMITH’S recent book, Law’s Quandary (Harvard University Press, JORGE VARGAS recently published the 2004), was the subject of a one-day con- following articles and book: “The Federal ference in October at Catholic Univer- Civil Code of Mexico,” 26 Inter-American sity. After an opening lecture by Smith, Law Review 229 (Winter/Spring 2005); comments on the book were given by “Concubines under Mexican Law: A Professor Joseph Vining (Michigan), Comparative Overview with Canada, Professor Patrick Brennan (Villanova), France, Germany, England and Spain,” Professor Lloyd Weinreb (Harvard) and The Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Justice Antonin Scalia. Smith then re- Americas (Winter 2005, forthcoming); and

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 29 class action

Class Action is an update on the personal and professional news of your classmates and other alumni.

Please submit information and photographs to the Advocate, USD School of Law, Communications Department,

5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92110-2492. You may also e-mail your news to [email protected].

addition to serving as dean DONALD WORLEY retired from of two law schools. Lane in- law practice in November ’59 ’68 vites all classmates to contact 2004. He now devotes his him at (949) 863-9390 or time to acting in film and THOMAS SHARKEY is a member WILLIAM D. PALMER was re- [email protected]. television. One of his recent of the USD School of Law cently appointed to the Kern roles was General Patton for Board of Visitors. During his County Superior Court bench T. WORTHINGTON VOGEL retired the History Channel’s epic career, he was named a fellow by Governor Schwarzenegger. recently after spending 31 “The Battle of the Bulge.” in the American College of He has been a commissioner years as an assistant district Trial Lawyers and an advocate with the court since July attorney. He now works part- in the American Board of Trial 2005, and was previously a time instructing students on Attorneys. He was a partner partner at various Bakersfield, criminology. ’71 and trial lawyer at McInnis, Calif., law firms. Fitzgerald, Rees & Sharkey WILLIAM PATE, a retired before the firm’s 1999 merger Superior Court judge, won with Higgins Fletcher & Mack the San Diego County Bar LLP. After the merger, he ’69 ’70 Association’s 2006 Service WILLIAM H. HITT graduated in Award for Outstanding Jurist. remained of counsel to the STEVE R. CLOUD is CEO of 2003 from the Claremont firm until he left to pursue a Fresno Distributing in Fresno, School of Theology with a solo practice specializing in Calif., and R.V. Cloud Co. master of divinity. He is cur- mediations and arbitrations in Campbell, Calif. Both com- in 2001. rently the senior pastor at the ’72 panies are involved in the United Methodist Church in wholesale plumbing business. ROBERT LEAMAN tries complex Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. Cloud wishes his fellow criminal cases as chief trial Day Class of ‘69 friends the counsel for the New Jersey ’64 MICHAEL R. LENNIE has a prac- Division of Criminal Justice. very best. tice devoted exclusively to BETTY BOONE recently shared He was promoted to that the representation of authors, with the Lawyers Club of GARY LANE lives and works in position in July 2002. He negotiating author/publisher San Diego stories of being Irvine, Calif., serving as gen- also manages the division’s contracts and litigating dis- one of the first practicing eral counsel to ASR Properties north regional office in putes with publishers. He female attorneys in the and its affiliated companies, Whippany, N.J. is also the primary literary San Diego community. Her including The Khoshbin agent in the Lennie Literary stories are in the association’s Company, Khoshbin Proper- JOSEPH O. LITTLEJOHN retired Agency. March 2006 newsletter. ties and a Ferrari-Maserati from the bench in April 2006 dealership called Exotic after 25 years of service as a GEORGE STANDEFER is no Motorsports Unlimited. He Municipal Court and then longer practicing law. He has enjoys playing video games, Superior Court judge in the taught English as a second basketball and riding an elec- San Diego area. He plans to language overseas and would tric scooter with his 12-year- continue working on legal love to hear from classmates. old son. He spent much of his issues, particularly in the career representing hospitals area of juvenile law reform. and teaching contract law in

30 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE IGNAZIO J. RUVOLO was ap- 10th circuits of the U.S. KATHLEEN D. WELLMAN founded MICHAEL D. PADILLA practices pointed in December and Court of Appeals. Caring Residents of Carlsbad personal injury, construction confirmed in January 2006 Inc., a nonprofit fundraising and product defect and med- as the presiding justice of JAMES T. WARING currently group for charitable causes, ical malpractice at his firm, the First District Court of serves as San Diego’s director in 1990. San Diego-based O’Mara & Padilla. He lives in Appeals, Division Four. of land use and economic 10News.com recently hon- Rancho Santa Fe, Calif. development. ored her efforts with a leader- THOMAS J. WARWICK JR. ship award. practices criminal law in San Diego where he works ’76 with law partner BOB GRIMES ’74 BENTON BECKLEY sells Boss at Grimes & Warwick. ’75 RICHARD GARIEPY practices law Hoss motorcycles and enjoys in Sun Valley, Idaho. He wel- C. DAN CONAWAY retired after time spent at his Lake comes contact with alumni. 30 years of practicing law. He Arrowhead, Calif., house. ’73 will continue his nonprofit af- J. RICHARD HADEN handled filiations and look for other, JOHN BURNS has been an in- WILLIAM F. HERTZ has served many types of cases before nontaxing, things to do. He vestor and board member with as an advisor for professional retiring from the San Diego says. “I intend to stay busy San Diego companies SYS athletes like Steve Garvey, Superior Court bench after and enthused about a number Technologies, Inc., Alturdyne, Barry Zito, Trevor Bell, and 21 years of service. He coor- of things that interest me.” Inc. and Airsis, Inc. Jason and Matt Hirsh. He dinated statewide natural gas lives in Glendale, Calif. antitrust cases and regularly PATRICK R. DIXON was one of MAX HANSEN serves as the ABA managed an inventory of 500 the government attorneys representative to the House JEROME SCHIEFELBIEN has to 600 civil cases. He resolved working on Stanley Tookie of Delegates, is a member of practiced bad-faith insurance between 10,000 and 12,000 Williams’ capital appeal. that body’s nominating com- law and plaintiff legal mal- civil cases from the time that Dixon has been in charge of mittee and participates in the practice and ethics in Austin, he was designated a civil in- the major crimes division for ABA Tax section. He also lec- Texas, since 1991. He litigates dependent calendar judge in the district attorney’s office tures throughout the country in Texas state courts as well as 1992 until he retired. in Los Angeles County since on Internal Revenue Code in the Federal, 5th, 9th and April 2003. § 1031 deferred-tax property exchanges.

Susanne Stanford ’75 Receives Author E. Hughes Career Achievement Award

ay 6, 2006, Susanne Stanford ‘75 received the Author E. Hughes Career Achievement Award. The award is part of the University of San Diego Alumni Honors—a tribute to M outstanding graduates in the areas of career achievement, contributions to humanitarian causes and volunteer service to USD. Long considered a trailblazer in the San Diego community, Susanne Stanford has been a mentor and advocate for women in the legal field for decades. In 1980, she became the first female partner at Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP and soon thereafter was named to head the firm’s family law department. An active member of the community, Stanford has volunteered time with the American Inns of Court, the Museum of Photographic Arts, the San Diego Bar Association and California Women Lawyers. She is a past president of the Lawyers Club of San Diego and served on the USD School of Law Board of Directors. Stanford is now a retired partner and of counsel at the firm Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP. For more information about USD Alumni Honors, visit www.sandiego.edu/alumni/honors.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 31 class action

HARRI KETO lives in Tustin, VICTOR SALERNO and wife Calif. He has four children, Laurie celebrate their 31st of whom two have graduated anniversary in July 2006. ’79 from college. He is general They were married in LARRY ALAN BURNS, a federal counsel and chief operating the Immaculata while in judge for the District of officer for Centerstone law school. Southern California, was Communities. the sentencing judge for JIM STROFFE continues to be former congressman Randy DENISE MCGUIRE recently re- a shareholder of Friedman, Cunningham. tired from her position as Stroffe & Gerard, P.C., where chief deputy of the San Diego he chairs the Real Property EUGENE KUSION has been in District Attorney’s Office. and Construction Practice Leonard Armato ’78 private practice for the past Group. His daughters Jennifer 20 years. Before that, he spent GARY L. PADEN was appointed and Sheri recently formed six years working for the U.S. by the governor in July 2005 Stroffe Properties, a full- government. He still surfs career, this time in the role of and sworn into service in service real estate agency. around the world and para- senior counsel at Boornazian, August 2005 to the bench of sails and dives when he can. Jensen & Garthe in Oakland, the Tulare County Superior His youngest child is 15, and Calif. He still finds time to Court. His current assign- the oldest entered college sail and ski. ment is Drug Court and ’78 last fall. felony trials. LEONARD ARMATO is commis- JOSEPH GHOUGASSIAN, an sioner and president of the ALICE YARDUM-HUNTER was advisor to the Coalition Association of Volleyball honored for the second time Provisional Authority, was in ’77 Professionals. He and his in the “Super Lawyer 2005” Iraq to reconstruct their edu- company, Management Plus, issue of Los Angeles Magazine in cational system. Formerly, RONALD FRANT has been purchased the league in its immigration law category. he was ambassador to Qatar, married to wife Bobbie for May 2001. She represents foreign citi- director of Peace Corps 21 years. They enjoy their zens, their American employ- operations in Yemen and a Maltese dog as well as travel- ANDREW HOLCOMBE was ers and their close relatives, senior advisor in President ing and helping others with- elected to a four-year term on and is an expert witness in Reagan’s Department of out having to worry about the Chico, Calif., city coun- cases where immigration law Domestic Policy. the work grind. cil. He was a legal services at- issues impact litigation. torney and has been running DAN GROSZKRUGER accepted THOMAS LOCHTEFELD opened an eviction defense practice the position of first director Wave House, a $7 million, in Chico. of legal services for Tri-City water-themed entertainment ’80 Medical Center, a 400-bed center, in Mission Beach, FREDERICK SCHENCK became GEORGE DEANE III practiced law acute care hospital in Calif., in June 2005. His other president of the Washington, for 18 years in California be- Oceanside, Calif., on company, WaveLoch, sells D.C., nonprofit Civil Justice fore deciding to live on his September 1, 2004. He func- souped-up wave machines. Foundation, which funds boat and sail in Mexico for a tions as in-house counsel, di- He was recently featured in grants to consumer grassroots year. He then went to Kauai, rector of risk management Forbes for his inventions and organizations. He also antici- Hawaii, where he spent two and director of patient safety. entrepreneurial efforts con- pates publication of the sixth years scuba diving and per- cerning surfing and other edition of a book he co-au- fecting his golf game. Upon PAUL JACOBS and wife DEBRA water sports. thored, California Automobile returning to California, Deane DODDS ‘82 share a law practice Collision Handbook, and contin- became a yacht broker for a in Newport Beach, Calif. ues as consulting editor for year and a half. He finally They have five children. Matthew Bender’s Pleading and returned to his litigation Practice.

32 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE BARRY NUSSBAUM recently Association’s 2006 Service joined the board of directors Award for Service to the at Surge Global Energy, Inc. ’81 Legal Profession. ’82 He is president and founder LILIA GARCIA was chosen to re- H. MARK DAVIS is married and of BNC Real Estate, which ALEXANDER SCHACK (LL.M. 1986) ceive the San Diego County has one daughter (6). An FBI owns properties in Texas. continues to specialize in Bar Association’s 2006 Service agent since 1986, he conducts In addition, he co-founded anti-trust and consumer class Award for Diversity. overseas operations for terror- the wireless technology com- actions. His wife Kathy is ism investigations from a base pany Digital Orchid, raising part-owner of Savoir Faire ROBERT HARRISON, past presi- in San Diego. more than $10 million for Stables in San Marcos, Calif. dent of the Association of the venture. They have two children, John Southern California Defense DEBRA DODDS and husband and Amanda, along with three Counsel, was honored by the PAUL JACOBS ‘80 share a law VENUS SOLTAN is a complex dogs, two cats, two tortoises San Diego Defense Lawyers practice in Newport Beach, business litigation attorney and an iguana. as the 2004 Defense Lawyer Calif. They have five chil- in Orange, Calif. Both the of the Year. dren. Los Angeles and San Francisco JEFFREY E. THOMA and wife Daily Journal listed her in the Kim celebrated the birth of JANICE F. MULLIGAN received MARK UHLFELDER (LL.M. 1984) top 75 women trial attorneys their first baby, Charles Ryan, the San Diego County Bar is a partner at Ski.com, the in California in both 2004 on December 5, 2004. largest independent ski travel and 2005. company in the nation. He worked in Washington, D.C., as a tax lawyer for 10 years before joining Ski.com. Deborah A. Wolfe ’80 ELOY VILLA has been executive Elected CASD Trial Lawyer of the Year director of the Office of Internal Affairs for San Diego arlier this year, Deborah A. Wolfe ‘80 received County since 1998. In addi- E the Trial Lawyer of the Year award from the tion, he is the county ethics Consumer Attorneys of San Diego for her “un- officer, a position which car- selfish efforts ... to compensate past victims and prevent ries the responsibility of train- future injuries,” as described on the award plaque. ing county employees on ethical and legal standards. Throughout 2005, Wolfe tried a series of dental mal- Villa has also served on the practice cases. Although the verdicts were not astronomi- boards of several charitable cal, she won damages and negotiated settlements for organizations. plaintiffs who might otherwise not have had legal representation. She also brought the dentist’s actions to the attention of the California Dental Board. The board ultimately revoked his license, ensuring that the commu- ’83 nity is protected from his negligent work. DARITY WESLEY is the new Wolfe is one of only two CASD members to receive editor in chief of Principal this award twice; she previously accepted it in 1996 and has received other honors from the Broker Online, an online magazine for real estate pro- group, and also from San Diego Trial Lawyers and Who’s Who. fessionals in North America. Formerly a partner at Nugent, Weinman, Abbene, & Alcock, APC, Wolfe recently opened her own office, The Wolfe Legal Group. She will continue litigating and consulting, and will teach in addition to pro tem work on the municipal court bench. She is married to Lester McDonald and has two children.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 33 class action

JERRY GONICK (LL.M.) and wife personal injury. She lives in EARL M. FORTE III currently rep- SUSAN GONICK ‘86 pledged San Diego and has a daughter, resents USGen New England, ’84 $1.75 million to the School of Olivia (4). Inc., a deregulated PG&E Law in order to endow a chair Corp. subsidiary, in its bank- ROBERT GAGLIONE is the presi- in elder law. He retired from ruptcy. His wife Deborah dent of the Todd American law practice but continues to is a family physician and Inn of Court in San Diego. consult on securities matters. ’85 marathon runner who ran in In January, he was the chair her third consecutive Boston of the annual dinner of the JAMES BELLINSON lives in DONALD JONES joined Marathon last year. They San Diego chapters of the Birmingham, Michigan, with Qualcomm in 2002 and is have two sons: Thomas (7) American Inns of Court. The his wife of nine years and vice president of business and Jonathon (4). guest speaker this year was their three children: Cooper development, overseeing Ken Feinberg, special master (7) and twins Nick and Dara research and development ROBERT K. GOFF is a founding of the September 11th Victim (5). He owns and operates around the convergence of partner of Goff & DeWalt, Compensation Fund. 32 RV resorts and manufac- cell phone technologies and tured home communities LLP in Seattle, where he lives medical devices, bio sensors with his family. He also estab- DAVIDE GOLIA established the in Florida. and healthcare applications. lished and serves as CEO of construction law firm Marks, Restore International, an or- Golia & Finch, LLP in April LESA CHRISTENSON says that in ELIZABETH WALKER is a partner ganization which investigates 1987. Davide and Tess have April her law firm, Ashworth, at the Los Angeles office of and rescues children from three boys and recently cele- Blanchet, Christenson, & Sidley Austin LLP. She con- sexual slavery in India. brated 24 years of marriage. Kalemkiarian, moved into a tinues to work in the area of Travis (15) and Taylor (13) are building it purchased at Third civil litigation. DAVID MORWAY continues to students at La Jolla County Avenue and Juniper Street in be senior vice president of Day School. Tommas (18) the Banker’s Hill neighbor- SUSAN YECK opened a law basketball administration played guard for the Williams hood of San Diego. The firm clinic in March 2004 and still for the Indiana Pacers, an College basketball team dur- specializes in family law maintains the Law Offices of NBA franchise. ing his first year there. matters. Susan A. Yeck, a firm specializing in business litigation and

George Chanos ’84 Named Nevada Attorney General

evada Attorney General George Chanos ’84 has been busy since taking the oath of office in November last year. He obtained taxpayer relief through settlements with N major corporations, responded to proposed federal legislation to create a nuclear waste site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada and participated in a multi-state resolution asking Congress for help in fighting methamphetamine crimes. He will also argue retroactive application of a hearsay decision before the Supreme Court. No stranger to politics, Chanos interned at a federal senator’s office before going to law school. After graduating from USD, he litigated in San Diego and then Nevada. Chanos decided to rejoin the public sector when a friend and Republican National Committeeman who was looking for a new attorney general asked him to quit making money and start helping Nevada. He assumed the attorney general post when the previous attorney general resigned to become a member of the federal bench. Chanos plans to run for re-election in November. Aside from his legal career, he is known as the inventor of the board game Notable Quotables and the artist behind the paintings at www.chanosgalleries.com. He and wife Adriana Escobar have one daughter, Alexandra.

34 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE CAROLYN L. REILLY has been He is currently corporate Small Business Administration DAVID L. RICE (LL.M.), a the director of Elder Law & counsel and director of gov- to advise small businesses en- California Certified Specialist Advocacy, a California non- ernment relations for Jack in tering the export field. in Taxation Law and principal profit providing free legal the Box Inc. at Rice & Renshaw, APLC, services to those aged 60 and THEODORE BOUTROUS currently chairs the California State older in San Diego and San CRAIG FRIEDBERG founded the represents Wal-Mart in an Bar Association’s Income Bernardino counties, for the Law Office of Craig B. equal-pay discrimination Tax Committee as well as past five years. She oversees Friedberg, Esq., in 1999. The class-action lawsuit. the Los Angeles County Bar a total staff of 23, including firm emphasizes consumer Association’s Tax Committee eight attorneys, and manages protection and intellectual WILLIAM LAVELLE and Beth on Procedure and Litigation. a $1 million budget. property law. In 1992, he have been married 16 years. married Lauriann Bradford. LaVelle spends his time AMY ROMAKER (LL.M.) joined NICHOLAS J. YOCCA was ap- He has two stepchildren, coaching track teams for their Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & pointed to the board of direc- Joshua (23) and Nicole (18), daughters, Chloe (10) and Hampton LLP as the director tors of Oxford Media, Inc. He and a son, Ian (13). Shelby (7), and running a of client service teams. She is a partner in The Yocca Law three-attorney firm in will be based in Del Mar Firm, LLP, where he practices SUSAN GONICK and husband Patchogue, New York. Beth Heights, Calif. business and securities law. JERRY GONICK (LL.M. 1984) has been teaching elementary pledged $1.75 million to the school for the past 12 years. LAURI STOCK and law partner School of Law in order to She plans to open an art stu- M.E. Stephens expanded endow a chair in elder law. dio to showcase her work and relocated their firm to ’86 She has retired from her secu- this summer. the San Diego Chamber rities litigation practice. Building in November 2005. MEREDITH G. ALCOCK was Stock Stephens, LLP is in its named a top attorney in the KATHERINE NAKAMURA is run- seventh year of practice and 2006 edition of The Best R. CLAYTON WELCH continues ning again for office on the focuses on family law and Lawyers in America. She prac- to handle subrogation claims San Diego Board of criminal defense. Stock serves tices estate planning and set- as in-house counsel for State Education. Nakamura has as a settlement judge in family tlement, and litigates probate Farm Insurance. He enjoys been a member of the school court, on the court appointed and trust matters as a partner surfing and visiting his chil- board since 2002. minor’s counsel panel and is a at Nugent Weinman Abbene dren and grandchildren in charter member of San Diego & Alcock APC. California and Hawaii. MIGUEL SMITH completed a two-year term as managing Uptown Sunrise Rotary Club. partner of Solomon Ward STEVEN ALTMAN was elected to JAMES VALLIENT authored the Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP. ’87 He practices real property The Passion of Ayn Rand’s Critics Inc. board of directors in and transactional law. He is (May 2005). His political March 2006, where he serves ALAN R. ALVORD accepted and legal views are regularly on the Compensation and appointment to the position married with a stepdaughter heard as he commentates Human Resources Commit- of Administrative Law Judge (15) and daughter (3). for Fox 6 and KUSI, among tee. He will donate compen- for California’s Office of other San Diego area local sation received for those Administrative Hearings. news programs. services to diabetes charities. ’88 Altman remains president of DAVID L. BOURGOIN traveled to QUALCOMM. Antarctica to make a multime- MARK PACHOWICZ reports that dia presentation for TCR after years as a deputy district ’89 STEPHEN BRIGANDI was named Productions. He is also a re- attorney, child support attor- chairman of the National gional coordinator in Hawaii ney and executive director of PETER V. ALLEN is an adminis- Council of Chain Restaurants. for the Export Legal Assist- a union, he is pleased to an- trative law judge at the He has been a member of the ance Network, a cooperative nounce the opening of his California Public Utilities council for more than four effort between the Federal Bar own law firm in Camarillo, Commission in San Francisco. years and will remain chair- Association, the Department Calif. He and his wife, Lynne- man through October 2006. of Commerce and the U.S. Rachel Altman, have two daughters (7 and 2).

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 35 class action

ing officer of the Nevada op- Reynolds, P.C., where she RON NORTHUP was appointed erations of MTR Gaming practices intellectual property to the San Joaquin County Group, Inc. Previously, he has law in Concord, Mass. Superior Court bench in held similar roles including March 2006 by Governor vice president of Casino MICHAEL SLATER and Laurel Schwarzenegger. Operations for Tropicana celebrated 16 years of mar- Hotel and Resort, senior vice riage in December 2005. CHARLOTTE J. ORCUTT was ap- president at Sands Hotel and They have three daughters: pointed to the San Joaquin Casino and president of the Sarah (11), Mollie (9) and County Superior Court judici- land-based gaming board in Katie (6). Slater was ap- ary. Before the appointment Louisiana. pointed assistant city attor- she was a commissioner with Patricia Garcia ’89 ney in Fresno, Calif., in the county. JANNIKE SYSE (LL.M) was re- November 2003. cently accepted at NORDEM, PATRICIA GARCIA, a San Diego the Norwegian resource bank MICHAEL SPATA (LL.M.) is now Superior Court Judge, is now for democracy and human the city attorney of Lathrop, ’92 rights administered by the Calif. He previously worked at the El Cajon Courthouse MICHAEL CORDIER has been a presiding over a family law Norwegian Centre for Human for Tulare County, Calif. shareholder in the Phoenix department. She also serves Rights and run in cooperation Office at DeConcini as vice-president of the with the Norwegian Refugee GINA M. WEIHERT has spent McDonald Yetwin & Lacy, San Diego County Judges Council. Syse will be given the past 10 of her 15 years P.C., for the past year. Association. international assignments of insurance defense litiga- He practices intellectual promoting democratization tion experience with Barry property, employment de- SANGEETA JAIN (LL.M.) was and respect for human rights Bartholomew & Associates. fense and construction law. honored with the Indus after completing an introduc- She was awarded the title “Trial Attorney of the Year” Women Leaders annual award tory course in human rights SIMON SILVA works for the city for her public service and field work. last year, in part because attorney in San Diego where commitment to improving the of her four defense wins in he gives legal advice to the lives of South Asian-American DAVID H. WISE opened a new five trials. police department. He and his law firm, Waters & Wise, women. Jain is a member of wife CLAUDIA SILVA ’93 have several women, children and PLLC. The firm has offices two daughters: Gabrielle and family-oriented organizations. in Virginia, Maryland and Isabelle. She is currently a magistrate Washington, D.C., and will ’91 provide expertise in construc- for the Fourth Judicial District STEPHEN D. HOFFMAN was in Minnesota and adjunct tion defect and toxic tort law. promoted to partner at law professor at Hamline Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & ’93 University. Smith LLP. He litigates RICHARD BRITSCHGI was made primarily in the areas of insur- partner at Kutak Rock LLP. JOE MARSHALL is a shareholder ’90 ance defense, construction He continues to specialize in practicing in the reorganiza- JOSEPH FLETCHER III was defect, commercial products public finance, financial guar- tion/corporate finance group made a partner at Holland & liability, personal injury and anty insurance and interest of the Texas firm Munsch Knight. He works in the wrongful death. rate swaps and derivatives at Hardt Kopf & Harr, P.C. He business section of the firm’s the firm’s Irvine, Calif., office. and wife Julie live in Coppel, San Francisco office. MICHAEL KIM is a partner at a Dallas suburb, along with Peters & Freedman, L.L.P, MARY B. GALARDI is honored to their three children: Hutton DOREEN HOGLE was elected where he represents home- be listed in the “Super Lawyer (14), Kelly (13) and Ben (10). president of the Boston Patent owner associations as general 2006” issue of Atlanta Magazine Law Association. A past issue counsel and specializes in in its Estate Planning/Trusts WILLIAM H. ROBINSON was re- of Boston Magazine named her litigation. category. Galardi represents cently appointed chief operat- one of Massachusetts’ “super clients in the areas of estate lawyers.” She is a partner at planning and business law. Hamilton, Brook, Smith &

36 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE She is beginning the eighth ney. She and husband SIMON BRYAN J. HOLLAND was re- year of her law firm, Mary B. SILVA ’92 have two daughters: cently hired as the chief Galardi, P.C. Gabrielle and Isabelle. financial officer of Electric ’95 Aquagenics Unlimited, Inc. REBECCA CADY advanced to RICHARD HEALY (LL.M.) is a staff The business develops and partner at Grace Hollis Lowe attorney at the McGeorge produces new cleaning Hanson & Schaeffer LLP. She School of Law’s Institute for ’94 processes and machines. manages the firm’s regional Administrative Justice. In that JOHN ALESSIO started a law office in Visalia, Calif. In ad- capacity, he manages contract ROBERT LITTLE is admitted to firm, Thompson & Alessio, dition, she is the editor of the attorneys for the California the practice of law in six LLP, approximately four years Journal of Nursing Administration’s Parole Advocacy Program. states, is certified as a criminal ago. The firm concentrates Healthcare Law, Ethics, and trial attorney in Manhattan on litigation and transactional Regulation and is the author JOHN IANNARELLI recently and New Jersey, and has ar- aspects of business, employ- of two books. was promoted from a position ment and real estate law. gued before an en banc U.S. in FBI headquarters in Court of Appeals. He also Washington, D.C., to the provides some legal commen- FRANK BOTTINI is a partner position of supervisory special at Wolf Haldenstein Adler tary for Court TV. ’96 agent in the FBI’s Phoenix Freeman & Herz LLP and CLAUDINE SHERMAN ABRAHAM division. practices in the firm’s San JONATHAN MONTAG practices and husband Bryan celebrated Diego office. In April 2005, immigration law at Montag the birth of daughter Claire SHEILA R. MOHAN worked in he traveled to Seoul, South & Nadalin LLP in San Diego. Louise on November 17, the administration of former Korea, where he gave a He is a member of the 2005. Abraham practices em- California Governor Davis for keynote speech on class ac- National Benefit Center ployment law at Friedman five years before returning to tion securities litigation at the Liaison Committee, the Stroffe & Gerard, P.C., in the state Office of Legislative second annual CFO Forum. AILA Annual Conference Counsel in late 2003. In 2004, Planning Committee, the Irvine, Calif. she and husband Jay opened AILA National Membership JOHN CALLAHAN recently LISA KENNY CAREY is a sole an “original concept pizzeria.” was promoted to full equity Committee and the Immi- practitioner specializing in The family has two additional partner at the law firm gration Today Editorial family law from her office in members: daughter Mira (5) McDermott Will & Emery Advisory Board. downtown San Diego. Her and son Kieran (2). LLP. Callahan continues to husband practices construc- focus his practice on health SCOTT S. OLIVER joined the tion defense law. They have RICHARD OSTROW is now a sen- sector mergers and acquisi- Palo Alto, Calif., office of been married for five years ior litigator in the business tions and life sciences transac- Morrison & Foerster LLP as a and have a son (2). and real estate group of the tions. He lives in Chicago partner in February 2006. He law firm Kimball, Tirey & with wife Christine and practices in the Intellectual CRAIG CHERNEY is manager of St. John. He practices in daughters Claire (5) and Property Group. land Acquisitions for Pulte the firm’s San Diego office. Charlotte (3). Ostrow formerly served as MARY PARNOW lives in Homes in Las Vegas. He pre- a deputy city attorney for Oakland, Calif., with her viously served as corporate NAOMI COHEN had a baby girl counsel for Rhodes Homes San Diego. named Shoshana and is now husband, baby son and two and staff attorney and law back at work at the Children’s Belgian shepherds. She is sen- clerk for U.S. District Court JOEL SELIK (LL.M.) received the Court in Los Angeles. ior assistant regional counsel President’s Star Award from for the Social Security Judge Thomas J. Whelan. the Consumer Attorneys of Administration and frequently Cherney is married to AUBREE KRISTEN J. FOSSLER works as a CHERNEY ’05. The couple is San Diego. deputy city attorney at the argues in front of the 9th extensively remodeling their San Diego Office of the City Circuit Court of Appeals. historic Vegas home. They CLAUDIA GACITUA SILVA liti- Attorney. She is married and maintain a summer residence gates land use cases for San has two children: Jared (6) in the San Diego Gaslamp Diego as a deputy city attor- and Madeleine (4). District, which they frequent during Nevada’s hot summers.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 37 class action

STACEY E. JAMES was named JONATHAN B. and wife CHRISTA partner at Sheppard, Mullin, A. TALLMAN welcomed daugh- Richter & Hampton LLP ear- ’97 ter Catherine on January 5, lier this year. She practices in 2005. She joined big sister ANNIKA GREEN FROSTICK works the Labor and Employment Megan (5) and brother Ryan for the Vermont Attorney Practice Group in the firm’s (3). The family lives in San General as an assistant prose- San Diego office. Jose, Calif. cutor. In that capacity, she also serves as a special assis- RICHARD MACDONOUGH JR. DEREK VOSSKUHLER passed the tant U.S. attorney. Her son, (LL.M.) no longer practices California State Bar family Colby Thomas, was born law. He is now director of law specialization exam. October 6, 2004. Sophia Ray ’96 the District of Columbia Operations for the Fraser THOMAS D. WAYLETT is now a ALEXANDRA GASS and husband Forbes Company, LLC, where partner at Adamski Moroski Sean had their first child, he works as a land sales spe- Madden & Green LLP. He Tucker, on February 3, 2005. cialist. He and wife Julia, specializes in real property, son Joseph (3) and daughter regulatory and business dis- SEAN P. HEALY was named part- Catherine (1) live in putes and transactions. He ner at the Phoenix office of Rockville, Md. lives in Paso Robles, Calif., Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & with his family. Smith LLP. DARREN MCELFRESH had his second child, Kian McElfresh, KRISTIN JOHNSON ZLOTNIK JOHN NICHOLSON has been a on July 17, 2004. married ANDREW ZLOTNIK ’02 partner at Adamski Moroski in September 2005. Madden & Green LLP since SOPHIA RAY and husband Naoki Kawada ’97 early 2005. He focuses on Henri had their first child, general business litigation. Tigo, on December 4, 2005. He lives in San Luis Obispo, The delivery was difficult, ’98 Calif., with his family. but both mom and baby are ROBERT GLEASON and his healthy. The family lives MATTHEW ORZECH moved back partner, Marc Matys, are in Europe. to Southern California, where proud to announce the he is vice president of the birth of their son, Maxwell TIZA SERRANO THOMPSON real estate division of City Adam Matys-Gleason, on was promoted to partner in National Bank in La Jolla. September 23, 2005. December 2004 at Matheny He and his wife Jayme have Sears Linkert & Long LLP in three children: Matthew (9), VICTOR HANNA, formerly man- Sacramento. She primarily Mikessa (6) and Michael (4). aging director of Comdisco Jack Balderson Jr. ’99 practices personal injury de- Ventures, is now a partner at fense, insurance coverage and LISA W. ROSAYA gave birth to Hybrid Capital, where he business counseling. She and a boy, Jackson Pierre, on manages the company’s invest- Tom have been married for February 9, 2005. She also has ment portfolio and acquires seven years. a daughter named Sabine (4). new investments. He is also a new member of iseemedia STEVEN ZADRAVECZ was re- DENA ROUDYBUSH and husband Inc.’s advisory board. He will cently promoted to partner at Rich welcomed baby Dylan help with that company’s Morrison & Foerster LLP. He Mark on May 27, 2005. He business development. works in the firm’s Orange weighed 9 lbs. 1 oz. Brothers County, Calif., office. Mitchell (6) and Ian (4) are NAOKI KAWADA was recently also pleased with the arrival. promoted to shareholder at The family lives in Virginia. Greenberg Traurig LLP where he heads the Japanese

38 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Practice Group of the firm’s a tax specialist. She practices ship and Russian bride issues, Los Angeles office. He lives tax law as a partner at the from her law offices in San in Bel Air, Calif., with wife Phoenix office of Snell & ’99 Juan Capistrano and Rancho Pamela. Wilmer, L.L.P. Mirage, Calif. JACK BALDERSON JR., a member of Thompson & Knight JUDITH LITZENBERGER chairs CHRISTIAN S. SCOTT joined LLP’s Litigation and Dispute the Military Law Committee the products liability group Resolution Practice Group of the San Diego County Bar of Wilson Petty Kosmo & ’00 in Dallas, focuses his practice Association. She also serves Turner LLP, where he prac- on litigation and antitrust KELLY CHANG participated in on the board of directors for tices theme park liability matters. He was recently “The Law Firm,” a television Walden Family Services, is a defense, commercial negli- made partner. reality show. She recently member of the Enright Inn of gence, product liability and moved from a law firm to her Court and has been a trainer personal injury. A. JOSEPH CHANDLER practices own real estate brokerage for some National Institute real estate and mining law company, Kelly Chang & Co. for Trial Advocacy courses. JACOB M. SLANIA joined the at the Phoenix firm Ryley San Diego firm of Kirby Carlock & Applewhite. HARRY W. HARRISON, formerly KATHLEEN TUTHILL MARINO and Noonan Lance & Hoge LLP of Gordon & Rees LLP, and husband of six years, Jeff, had as a partner in January 2006. DINA DAVALLE recently ac- JAMES R. PATTERSON, formerly their first child, Vincent, on His practice includes general cepted a position as assistant of Cooley Godward LLP, re- August 27, 2004. civil litigation, corporate general counsel for Capital cently formed Harrison, dissolutions and legal mal- One Finance in McLean, Va. Patterson & O’Connor LLP BRIAN PECK recently joined practice defense, among other with Matthew J. O’Connor. the international trade group specialties. SCOTT A. HARSHMAN (LL.M.) The firm maintains a civil liti- at Crowell & Moring LLP. moved to the Orange County gation and criminal defense He will work in the firm’s LAURI S. THOMPSON-BRACKEN office of Greenberg Traurig, practice servicing San Diego, Irvine, Calif., office. Peck was was a partner at the Las Vegas LLP where he is of counsel in Orange, Los Angeles and previously senior director firm Quirk & Tratos before the trusts and estates practice Riverside counties. for Intellectual Property at it merged with Greenberg group. He was previously a the Office of the U.S. Trade Traurig, LLP in May last partner at The Busch Firm. DAVID LASPALUTO now prac- Representative, Executive year. As a shareholder in tices commercial and intel- Office of the President, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, she CYNTHIA HARF KAIDEN (LL.M.) lectual property litigation in where, among other accom- continues to specialize in in- and her husband, David Phoenix at Perkins Coie LLP. plishments, he negotiated the tellectual property, entertain- Kaiden, welcomed Tanner’s He previously worked for intellectual property sections ment law and Internet law. little brother, Cooper Dane, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray of the U.S.-Andean and She also devotes time to on December 6, 2005. They Cary LLP. On December 28, U.S.-Panama Free Trade community issues and non- moved to Carlsbad, Calif., 2004, he married Nicole Agreements. profit charities. She has two last May. She will continue Wilkerson. children: Nikolas (6) and to work on court-appointed BAHAR SCHIPPEL (LL.M.) was Alexander (3). minors’ counsel cases. THOMAS LOHER (LL.M.) became appointed co-chairwoman a partner at the Zurich- on membership and vice- DAVID WOLFE is a raw food PHILIP S. PESIN was recently based law firm Thouvenin chairwoman of the LLC and expert living in Southern named chairman of Auriga Rechtsanwaelte, a leader in LLP subcommittees of the California, Manhattan and Laboratories’ board of commercial law. The firm’s American Bar Association’s Toronto. He recently pub- directors. clientele consists of national tax section committee on lished a book, Naked Chocolate, and multinational companies, partnerships and LLCs. The and runs www.rawfood.com. DENISE TESSIER-GLUZERMAN small and medium-sized ABA also recently selected (L.L.M.) practices real estate enterprises and private her to be one of six John S. and niche family law, such as individuals. Nolan Fellows. The Arizona palimony, domestic partner- Board of Legal Specialization previously certified her to be

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 39 class action

DARRELL MOORE (LL.M.) has STEVEN K. BRUMER (LL.M.) liability litigation involving worked with Inland Counties serves as chief financial officer pharmaceuticals and medical Legal Services, a legal aid and general counsel to Real devices as well as general firm serving Riverside and Estate Consulting Group Inc., litigation. San Bernardino counties, a San Diego real estate trans- since 2003. He loves his job, action management firm that YUNLI XU (LL.M.) works with which consists mainly of he co-founded. her husband at his immigra- helping clients with housing tion law firm. problems such as evictions ROGER F. LIU and his wife an- and foreclosures. Moore, his nounce the birth of their first ROHANEE ZAPANTA serves low- wife Barbara and their five child, daughter Aliana, on income clients through her Soo Lin ’02 children enjoy baseball, soc- February 13, 2006. law practice in Chula Vista, cer games and swim meets. Calif. Her fiancé, Bernard JAMES NGUYEN privately prac- Cassillan, makes house calls as D. TODD PHILIPS and his wife tices personal injury, toxic a physician’s assistant to ter- moved to Houston, Texas, mold and real estate law. minally ill and housebound in 2000, where she received patients. an MBA and he earned an ROBERT SCOFIELD (LL.M.) was MPA from the University hired by a CPA firm in ANDREW ZLOTNIK married of Houston. In June 2004, NewYork. KRISTIN JOHNSON ZLOTNIK ’97 Philips became chief of Policy in September 2005. and Governmental Affairs at the San Diego Housing Commission. The couple’s ’02 Sean Burdick ’03 first child, Greyson H. Philips, KEITH BRUNO was a contestant ’03 was born on September 23, on the reality television show KELLEY BOLAND is doing com- 2005, in San Diego. “The Law Firm.” He married pliance work in-house for a in August 2005. Denver, investment banking HERBERT STROH (LL.M.) special- firm, Keating Investments, izes in estate planning, trust, LISA A. and NOEL JAMES DORAN LLC. and probate law at the San were married in Founders Luis Obispo, Calif., law firm Chapel on June 5, 2005. SEAN BURDICK joined the of Sinsheimer, Schiebelhut & Orange County office of Snell Baggett. He was formerly a DANIELA REALI FERRARI began & Wilmer L.L.P. where he will partner at the Glendale, working as a deputy public focus on intellectual property Calif., firm of Whitesell & defender in San Diego in and technology with an em- Stroh. July 2005. phasis on patent litigation. Nathan Hicks ’04 He is a licensed Professional DAVID HUCH formed a law firm Engineer in California and in the La Jolla area of San lives in Lake Forest, Calif. ’01 Diego called Hawkes & Huch. LISA BRIDGMAN and husband He specializes in employment ANGELA PIERCE GEISLER and Dan proudly announce the and consumer class-action RICH GEISLER were married on birth of their son, Dylan cases. February 5, 2005. Ryder, on February 11, 2005. SOO Y. LIN joined the Los MICHAEL R. KIESLING clerks for Angeles office of Tucker Ellis the litigation department of & West LLP as an associate. Sempra Energy’s San Diego She practices products office.

40 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE MICHAEL B. LEES joined the law ﬁrm Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek as an associ- In Memoriam ate. His practice emphasizes general business and corpo- The University of San Diego School of Law community would like to extend rate transactions, taxation its deepest sympathy to family and friends. and real estate law. He was formerly an associate at JAMES T. CARROLL JR. ’77 died at home ANTHONY PASCALE ’82 passed away November Blanchard Krasner & French. February 13, 2006. He was a major in the 4, 2005, in Rahway, N.J. In 1982, he gradu- Marine Corps and served with the military ated from the School of Law summa cum laude WILLIAM REISING JR. and ALISA for 20 years, including in Vietnam where he and was class valedictorian. After graduation, L. LEDBETTER were married on was decorated many times, before retiring he moved to Rahway and opened a law July 30, 2005, in Dana Point, and earning a law degree. He tried cases for ofﬁce. He also worked for almost 20 years Calif. They returned to their more than 13 years as an assistant district as attorney to the city’s Planning Board. respective practices in Orange attorney in Pennsylvania. He then taught He served as a trustee at the local First County, Calif., after honey- humanities and law at several colleges. Presbyterian Church. mooning in Hawaii.

WILLIAM FLETCHER ’75 passed away on BARBARA L. SOREM ’76, a former senior re- ZANE TOMINNA (LL.M.) took March 10, 2006, in La Jolla, Calif., from search attorney for the Court of Appeals in part in ABA talks with the IRS complications after undergoing a bone-mar- both San Diego and Los Angeles, passed and Congress about tax re- row transplant operation to treat leukemia. away on December 22, 2004, in San Diego. form for the second year in He had a full career defending high-profile a row. criminal cases. He also participated in DAVID E. SPANDLE ’83 died December 13, 2005. professional organizations as president of He is survived by his wife Ida and son Jason. the Criminal Defense Lawyers Club in San ’04 Diego and chairman of the Private Conflicts MARGUERITE STEIN ’66 passed away on Counsel Program of the San Diego County August 24, 2005, due to complications from JACK DAILEY operates the Bar Association, among other assignments. heart surgery. She consistently sought op- Disabled Homeless Outreach portunities to give service, whether legally Project, which he started with CHRISTOPHER MCCALLISTER ’07 died June 25, or socially. Some of her achievements include the help of an Equal Justice 2006, in San Diego after being struck by a court-reporting for the Nuremberg war crimes Works Fellowship and the car. A native of Albuquerque, New Mexico, tribunal, prosecuting for the Oceanside, San Diego Legal Aid Society. McCallister was a respected and well-loved Calif., District Attorney’s Office, working student at the School of Law. as counsel for Napa County, Calif., and par- KRISTIN DENNIS (M.B.A. ‘01) Contributions to the Christopher ticipating in community theatre along the lives in Washington, D.C., McCallister Memorial Scholarship Fund way. She earned two masters degrees, one and works for the Secretary can be made by mailing donations to: in theology and the other in canon law, and of Defense, Under Secretary applied them, along with prior experience, of Defense for Intelligence. University of San Diego School of Law while she sat as a judge for the Roman Office of Development and Catholic Diocese in San Diego. NATHAN HICKS now practices Alumni Relations in the labor and employment 5998 Alcalá Park DAVID M. WILSON ’91 died March 1, 2006, in group at the Orange County, San Diego, CA 92110 San Diego. He was a member of the First Calif., office of Snell & Baptist Church in Danville, served in the Wilmer, L.L.P. Make checks payable to: “USD School Navy, and worked at General Dynamics. of Law” and note on the check that the He is survived by wife Teresa Bersch Wilson JIM SIDORICK is a project man- funds should be directed to the Christopher and two sons. ager in planning and land McCallister Memorial Scholarship Fund. acquisitions at McMillin Land CHERYL YARBROUGH ’99 died March 2004 from Development. a blood clot. She was very well-known for playing the harp.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 41 JEFF SPENCER and wife JAMES BOND passed the J. Meskill of the 2nd Circuit Autumn had a baby girl, Arizona bar exam and was United States Court of Patience Rebecca, on hired by the Phoenix office Appeals. They live in October 6, 2005. The family of Fennemore Craig. Connecticut. resides in Reno, Nev., where Spencer practices insurance DANIEL CHASE married Jessica CASEY LUSKIN authored amicus defense and general litigation. Cluphf in La Jolla, Calif., on briefs in the Dover, Pa., intel- June 10, 2005. ligent design case. He cur- JASON WALLER accepted an rently works for Discovery associate position at the AUBREE CHERNEY is an associ- Institute, an organization that Orange County, Calif., ate at the Las Vegas firm researches and promotes in- Mathieu Blackston ’05 office of Trovillion Inveiss Schreck Brignone, concen- telligent design theory. Ponticello & Demakis. trating on litigation and real estate matters. She is married KIMBERLY J. MILLER is an MICHAEL ZECH became an to CRAIG CHERNEY ’96. The associate at Knobbe Martens associate attorney at the San couple is extensively remodel- Olson & Bear LLP in Diego office of Trovillion ing their historic Vegas home. San Diego. Inveiss Ponticello & Demakis They maintain a summer in 2004. residence in the San Diego JUSTINE PHILLIPS practices Gaslamp District, which they general civil litigation at frequent during Nevada’s hot Seltzer Caplan McMahon ’05 summers. Vitek in San Diego. SAMANTHA LEBEDA is in SCOTT S. POELMAN (LL.M.) BENSON BARRERA joined the Benson Barrera ’05 litigation department of Portland, Ore., working as works as a tax attorney at Holland & Hart, LLP. He an associate for Schwabe, Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves works in the firm’s Boise, Williamson & Wyatt. & Savitch LLP in San Diego. Idaho, office. His first child, Zachary KEVIN HUGH LOGAN married Stoddard Poelman, was born MAURA MCCORMICK HARTMERE on September 15, 2005. MATHIEU BLACKSTON will focus on commercial litigation as a in Bronxville, N.Y., on new associate in the Orange October 22, 2005. He clerks HILLERY M. STONES joined County, Calif., office of Snell for The Honorable Alan H. the San Diego office of and Wilmer L.L.P. Nevas of the Federal District Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Court in Bridgeport, Conn. Scripps, LLP. She clerks for Judge Thomas

42 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE academic year in review school events

USD faculty and student groups host a variety of extracurricular events which enrich the intellectual life of the School of Law community. The following list includes many of the highlights of the 2004-2005 academic year.

“Music and the Law,” a program featuring American Bar Association Commission on McKeown, U.S. Court of Appeals, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, former Homelessness and Poverty and Pro Bono November 2004. associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Legal Advocates, October 2004. Guest speaker Dennis Doucette, partner at Court, presented by the La Jolla Minority Perspectives in the Law, with guest Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP, dis- Music Society in association with the speakers Judge Dana Sabraw, United cussing opportunities in business law and University of San Diego School of Law, States District Court judge for the recommended preparation for entering August 2004. Southern District of California; Jon S. that field, sponsored by the Business Law Guest Speaker Ray Krone, exonerated death Tangonan, Horton & Ryan; and Nancy Society, November 2004. row inmate, speaking on the inequities of Kawano, DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, The 2004 USD School of Law Distinguished the death penalty, life in prison and the sponsored by the Asian American Law Alumni Award, presented by the Law important role volunteer attorneys played Students Association, October 2004. Alumni Association Board of Directors to in securing his release, presented by Pro Careers in Environmental Law, with Alan K. Brubaker ‘76, sponsored by the Bono Legal Advocates, September 2004. guest speaker Marco Gonzalez, Coast Office of Development and Alumni Alumni Torts Appellate Moot Court Law Group, LLP, sponsored by the Relations, November 2004. Competition, sponsored by the Appellate USD Environmental Law Society, Jessup International Law Moot Court Moot Court Board, September 2004. October 2004. Competition: Final Round, sponsored by Law Firm Challenge Kickoff, alumni from Fundraiser for Doctors Without Borders in the Appellate Moot Court Board, various law firms in San Diego compete Darfur, Sudan, which raised over $1,700 November 2004. for the highest giving participation rate through the auctioning of various prizes California State Supreme Court Special and most dollars raised, this year the including mini-vacations and gift certifi- Session, held in the Kroc Institute for event was kicked off at the OMNI Hotel cates, sponsored by the Law and Peace & Justice in conjunction with Terrace followed by a Padres/Dodgers Diplomacy Club, November 2004. School of Law’s 50th Anniversary cele- baseball game, sponsored by the Office of Bowes-Madison Distinguished Speaker Series: bration. The justices, over two days, Development and Alumni Relations, heard cases ranging from criminal cases August 2004. “Media vs. Civilization: How the Messages of the Entertainment Industry Undermine the involving the death penalty to civil cases The Red Mass, a mass traditionally cele- Foundations of a Free and Ordered Society,” involving anti-SLAPP statutes and admin- brated on the first Monday in October with guest speaker Michael Medved, au- istrative remedies involving “whistle- where it coincides with the opening of a thor, film critic and nationally syndicated blower” claims. The event, which turned new session of the United States Supreme radio talk show host, sponsored by the out to be one the largest collaborative Court, celebrated by the Most Reverend USD School of Law, November 2004. public education events in the state Robert H. Broom, bishop of San Diego, court’s history, was sponsored by the co-sponsored by the USD School of 2004 Wohlmuth Highway Opening Colloquium, USD School of Law, December 2004. presented by Charles Goodwin, professor Law and St. Thomas More Society of of applied linguistics, University of 5th Annual Maudsley Fellows Appreciation San Diego, October 2004. California, Los Angeles, discussing Dinner, an annual event honoring special The National Conference on Homeless Courts, “Professional Vision,” November 2004. friends and supporters of the law school, “Taking the Court to the Streets,” a confer- sponsored by the Office of Development ence in which participants learned about Cutting Edge Intellectual Property Public and Alumni Relations, January 2005. the history of the homeless court, their Lecture: “File Swapping and File Sharing: The USD School of Law—Procopio potential roles in operating a program, Why Congress Can’t Fix Hollywood’s Problem,” with guest speaker Pamela Samuelson, International Tax Institute’s U.S.-Mexico the process of creating a homeless court Chancellor’s Professor of Information International Tax Update, featuring preemi- and the benefits of the program for com- and of Law, UC Berkeley and director, nent tax advisors discussing the newly- munities as well as their homeless resi- Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, enacted American Jobs Creation Act of dents, sponsored by the National with introduction by Judge M. Margaret 2004 as well as the latest Mexican inter-

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 43 national tax reforms, sponsored by the 2005 Law School Visit Day, for accepted Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Special Sitting USD School of Law and Procopio, Cory, applicants, including a tour, financial aid at the University of San Diego, hearing peti- Hargreaves & Savitch LLP, January 2005. and career services overviews, a class tions from the Federal Energy Regulatory presentation and lunch with members Commission stemming from the Cali- Nation on Edge: “Disaster Declaration, Relief, of the campus community, sponsored by fornia energy crisis in 2000 to 2001. and Mitigation—The Changing Role of the the USD School of Law, March 2005. The appellate panel consisted of Circuit Federal Government 1950-2000,” featuring Judges Sidney R. Thomas of Billings, Rutherford H. Platt, professor of geogra- Guest Speaker Jeff Carrol, general counsel Montana; M. Margaret McKeown of phy and planning law at the University for Santarus, Inc., discussing career oppor- San Diego, California; and Richard of Massachusetts, Amherst and James L. tunities in business law and recommended Clifton of Honolulu, Hawaii, April 2005. Huffman, dean and professor of law at preparation for entering the field, spon- Lewis & Clark Law School, sponsored by sored by the Business Law Society, 2005 Law School Visit Day, for accepted the USD School of Law, February 2005. March 2005. applicants, including a tour, financial aid and career services overviews, a class Nathaniel L. Nathanson Memorial Lecture Q&A Session with Guest Speaker Taha presentation and lunch with members Series, 21st Lecture: “The Origins of American Hassane, the Iman of the Islamic Center of of the campus community, sponsored by Constitutionalism,” with guest speaker San Diego, who spoke on topics ranging the USD School of Law, April 2005. Gordon S. Wood, Alva O. Way University from a brief introduction to Islam to the Professor and professor of history, Brown role of women in Islam, the ongoing con- Careers in International Law, with guest University, sponsored by the USD School flicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, sources of speaker David Brennan, one of the of Law, February 2005. Islamic law, the conditions in which jihad founding members of the International is legitimate, who has binding legal au- Association of Court Administrators 23rd Annual Careers in the Law, a brief panel thority in Islam and the compatibility be- (IACA) and graduate of USD’s Interna- presentation followed by a reception with tween Islam and democracy, sponsored tional LL.M. program, sponsored by the alumni, sponsored by the USD School of by the Islamic Legal Society, April 2005. Law & Diplomacy Club, April 2005. Law, the Law Alumni Board of Directors, the Office of Development and Alumni Nation on Edge: “Manifest Destiny and the Author E. Hughes Career Achievement Award, Relations and the Career Services Office, Natural Order: Markets, Property Rights, and awarded to The Honorable Napoleon February 2005. Ecological Planning,” featuring Arthur F. Jones Jr. ’71, sponsored by the Office McEvoy, professor of law, history and of Development and Alumni Relations, Paul A. McLennon, Sr. Honors Moot Court environmental studies at the University April 2005. Competition, with guest presiding of Wisconsin; and John H. Minan, judge The Honorable Alex Kozinski, professor of law, USD School of Law, United States Court of Appeals for the sponsored by the USD School of Law Ninth Circuit, sponsored by Professor and Pace University, April 2005. Michael R. Devitt and his family as well as the Appellate Moot Court Board, March 2005.

44 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE academic year in review faculty colloquia

A listing of the faculty colloquia presented during the 2004-2005 academic year.

David McGowan, associate professor of law, Viva R. Moffat, assistant professor of law, G. Marcus Cole, professor of law, Helen University of Minnesota Law School: University of Denver Sturm College of L. Crocker Faculty Scholar, and associate “The Trespass Trouble and the Metaphor Law: “Mutant Copyrights and Backdoor dean for Curriculum, Stanford Law Muddle” (additional context is provided Patents: The Problem of Overlapping School: “The Preference for Preferences: by an earlier paper, “Website Access: The Intellectual Property Protection,” Liquidation and Dividend Preferences Case for Consent”), September 17, 2004. October 25, 2004. in Venture Capital Structure,” March 17, 2005. Heidi Kitrosser, assistant professor of law, Sam Kamin, associate professor of law, Brooklyn Law School: “Introduction” and University of Denver Sturm College of Manuel A. Utset, professor of law, “Containing Unprotected Speech,” Law: “Bifurcation and Death-Qualiﬁcation University of Utah S.J. Quinney College October 1, 2004. of the Capital Jury: The Lessons of the of Law: “Self-Control Problems & Massachusetts Commission on Capital Contract Law,” April 1, 2005.” Edward J. Larson, Herman E. Talmadge Punishment,” November 1, 2004. Chair of Law, Richard B. Russell Professor Eric J. Mitnick, associate professor of of American History, University of Kathryn R. Abrams, Herma Hill Kay law, Thomas Jefferson School of Law: Georgia School of Law: “Excerpts from Distinguished Professor of Law, “Rights, Groups, and Self-Invention,” Narrative History of the Constitutional University of California, Berkeley, School April 8, 2005. Convention,” October 7, 2004. of Law (Boalt Hall): “Legal Feminism and Gabriel J. (Jack) Chin, Chester H. Smith the Emotions: Three Moments in an Shaun P. Martin, professor of law, Professor of Law, professor of Public Evolving Relation,” February 18, 2005. University of San Diego School of Law; Administration and Policy, and co- Frank Partnoy, professor of law, University Orin S. Kerr, associate professor of law, director of the Law, Criminal Justice of San Diego School of Law: George Washington University and Security Program, University of “Encumbered Shares,” October 13, 2004. Law School: “Rethinking Searches Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law: and Seizures in a Digital World,” “Reconstruction, Felon Disenfranchise- Brett H. McDonnell, associate professor February 25, 2005. ment and the Right to Vote: Did the of law, University of Minnesota Law Fifteenth Amendment Repeal Section 2 School: “Shareholder Bylaws, Shareholder Horacio Spector, dean and vice chancellor of the Fourteenth Amendment?” Nominations and Poison Pills,” of the Universidad Torcuato Di Tella— April 15, 2005. October 15, 2004. School of Law: “Philosophical Founda- tions of Labor Law,” March 1, 2005. Saikrishna B. Prakash, Herzog Research Miranda O. McGowan, associate professor Professor of Law, University of San Diego of law, University of Minnesota Law Lynn A. Stout, professor of law, UCLA School of Law: “Removal and Tenure in School: “In or Out? Groups and the 14th School of Law: sample chapter, “Culti- Ofﬁce,” April 22, 2005. Amendment after Lawrence v. Texas,” vating Conscience: Law and the Science October 20, 2004. of Morality,” March 4, 2005. Richard E. Levy, professor of law, University of Kansas School of Law: “Necessary and Proper Legislation,” April 29, 2005.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 45 endowment campaign report

A Few Ways Campaign Dear Alumni and Friends, Contributors are In a relatively short period of time, the University of San Diego School of Law has undergone a Helping the Law School dramatic transformation from its humble beginnings as a small law school with only a part-time, evening program. Today, it is a nationally ranked center of legal education with a faculty rated 22nd in the country in overall quality, an outstanding student body and highly accomplished alumni. The School of Law is now aiming for even greater prominence. To assist the law school in this endeavor, the Campaign for the University of San Diego School of Law was launched with the goal of doubling the size of the law school’s endowment. The law school needs a stronger endowment to build for the future. Over the years, endow- ments grow in value through sound investment and provide a major source of supplemental income. Instead of depending almost entirely upon revenues from tuition to fund its annual budget, as it now does, the law school could count on endowment income to make signiﬁcant, long-term The School of Law received investments in its faculty, students and academic programs. A substantial increase in funding $2.7 million from the San Diego County District Attorney to create will greatly bolster the core missions of the law school—education and research—while also the Energy Policy initiative providing funds for student aid, such as scholarships and loan repayment assistance, along with Center (EPIC). Out of the total additional resources to expand and improve the school’s career and academic counseling services. award, $1.5 million will be We gratefully acknowledge the following gifts and pledge commitments received for our used to establish a permanent endowment campaign thus far: endowment for EPIC. Cash Gifts San Diego County District Attorney $1.5 million Anonymous $500,000 Anonymous $250,000 Estate of Herbert Peterfreund $156,855 Virginia C. Nelson ’79 $104,000 Jane Trevor Fetter and Thompson Fetter ’67 $100,000 Mary J. and Clayton M. Anderson ’76 $50,000 Liz and Richard M. Bartell ’75 $50,000

Gale and Jim Krause ’75 will pro- Dennis J. Doucette ’86 $50,000 vide funds for the Class of 1975 Linden Root Dickinson Foundation/John R. Henkel ’77 $50,000 Professorship and for the general Terri and Michael B. Kaplan ’72 $50,000 use of the law school. Donna M. and Gerald L. McMahon ’64 $50,000 Trish M. and Vern D. Schooley ’66 $50,000

Planned Gifts and Bequests Susan S. ’86 and Jerry G. Gonick LL.M.T. ’84 $1.75 million Gale M. and James C. Krause ’75 $1 million Susanne Stanford ’75 $150,000 Leah S. Nathanson $50,000 Judy and Gary W. Schons ’76 $50,000 We are thankful for the leadership of these individuals and organizations who, with their gifts, are among the ﬁrst to make major ﬁnancial commitments to our campaign. Their generosity has Susan ’86 and Jerry Gonick LL.M.T. provided momentum to our effort and is inspiring others to give. ’84 will establish the Susan S. and Jerry G. Gonick Chair in Elder Law. Sincerely, Kevin Cole, Dean and Professor of Law

46 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE honor roll

School of Law Annual Giving

s the 2004–2005 USD School of Law Annual Fund chair, I am pleased to present the University of San Diego School of Law’s Annual Report on Giving for fiscal year 2004–2005 (July 1, 2004–June 30, 2005). We greatly appreciate the generous support and dedication of our alumni, students and friends. Your support is critical to the success of the school—it helps the School of A Law remain healthy and allows us to meet the challenges of the future. The USD School of Law received more than $3,885,000 in cash contributions and grants during the 2004–2005 fiscal year. Contribu- tions were used to help fund a variety of areas, including financial aid, the legal clinics, the Pardee Legal Research Center, the Center for Public Interest Law and the Children’s Advocacy Institute, the new Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC), and various academic programs and support services. The generosity of our donors and how their contributions are being put to use are illustrated in the following chart. To everyone listed in these pages, thank you for your support. If you were unable to contribute in 2004–2005, I invite you to join the thousands of alumni and friends whose donations have helped USD become one of the most prominent law schools in the country. Your generous contributions are essential to the future of our school and our students.

Todd F. Stevens ’88, Annual Fund Chair 2004–2005 USD School of Law Alumni Association Board of Directors

Allocation of Gift Revenue Fiscal Year 2004–2005:

$96,665 Academic Programs and Services $121,868 Financial Aid/Loan Repayment Assistance Program (LRAP) $266,860 Center for Public Interest Law/Children’s Advocacy Institute (CPIL/CAI) $324,342 Law Annual Fund $375,931 Legal Clinics $2,700,000 Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC)

$3,885,666 Grand Total

*The School of Law received more than $2.7 million from the San Diego County District Attorney to establish the Energy Policy Initiatives Center (EPIC). The funds came from a settlement in a law suit against Duke Energy. A little more than half of the funds, $1.5 million, will be used to establish a permanent endowment to support the operating needs of EPIC into the future while the balance of the funds will be used as start-up capital to help initiate and develop EPIC’s research and programmatic activities.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 47 honor roll

Dean’s Circle The following giving levels recognize alumni, faculty, students and friends who contributed $100 or more to the USD School of Law Founded in November 1995, the Dean’s Circle recognizes those during the 2004–2005 fiscal year (July 1, 2004–June 30, 2005). individuals and organizations whose cumulative philanthropy, including gifts and pledges through June 30, 2005, to the USD School of Law total or exceed $100,000. USD is most grateful to Maudsley Fellows Gift Level these members of the Dean’s Circle. Dean’s Senior Counsel $50,000+ Anonymous Dean’s Counsel $20,000–$49,999 Anonymous Senior Partners $10,000–$19,999 Anonymous Partners $5,000–$9,999 Arthur A. Herzog Family Trust Senior Associates $2,500–$4,999 Joan E. Bowes Associates $1,000–$2,499 The California Wellness Foundation Affiliates* $500–$999 Carthage Foundation Community Defenders, Inc. Counselors $500–$999 The ConAgra Foundation, Inc. Barristers $250–$499 Fiorenza Courtright Lucas Inger and Professor Kenneth Davis Advocates $100–$249 Professor Michael R. Devitt *Alumni who graduated within the past seven years Susan S. ’86 and Jerry G. Gonick LL.M.T ’84 Peggy and Charles M. Grace The Maximilian E. & Marion O. Hoffman Foundation Maudsley Fellows Victor & Ethel McQuistion The James Irvine Foundation Scholarship Trust Gwen T. and Robert Y. Rose M. and Arthur H. Kaplan DEAN’S SENIOR COUNSEL Nagata ’70 Gale M. and James C. Krause ’75 Anonymous The Honorable Lynn Schenk ’70 Kresge Foundation ConAgra Foods Foundation, Inc. and Professor C. Linden Root Dickinson La Jolla Bank Hugh Friedman Foundation/John R. Henkel ’77 Leonore Magee Betty and The Honorable Leah S. Nathanson Leah S. Nathanson Ross Tharp San Diego County Office of the District Attorney District Attorney Katherine H. and George M. Pardee, Jr. PARTNERS Anonymous Pacific Mutual Foundation DEAN’S COUNSEL Elaine Alexander and Professor Parker Foundation Anonymous Lawrence Alexander Helen and Sol Price Anonymous Joyce S. and Paul J. Dostart Anonymous Roman Catholic Diocese of San Diego Jodi Leazott Doucette ’87 and Professor Michael R. Devitt San Diego County Bar Association Dennis J. Doucette ’86 Barbara J. and Paul A. Peterson SD County District Attorney Pamela K. and Kenneth D. Scaife Family Charitable Trust Heller ’94 SENIOR PARTNERS The Honorable Lynn Schenk JD ’70 and Professor C. Jack Wm. Hodges ’75 Anonymous Gale M. and James C. Krause ’75 Hugh Friedman Anonymous Sunita and Patrick W. Martin ’92 Marilyn and James E. Spain Jr. Louise Horvitz Mary E. Mix ’77 and Carol Thorsnes Anne and Steven R. Dennis L. Livingston ’77 Michael T. Thorsnes ’68 Hunsicker ’75 Deborah J. ’84 and Mary M. ’74 and Arthur R. Joanne and Frank R. Warren Michael J. Rider ’83 Knowlson Jr. ’74 Weingart Foundation Karen and Brian T. Seltzer ’77 Richard Maudsley Darlene and Donald Shiley

48 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Sony Electronics Inc. Olive M. and The Honorable Helen W. and Webster B. Gerard Smolin Jr. ’77 Lysa M. and Jeffrey T. Gerald Brown Kinnaird ’75 Professor Lester B. Snyder Thomas ’82 Beryl J. and Norbert R. Bunt ’68 Kevin M. Kirby ’02 Kathleen and William R. Barbara and Philip Burkhardt ’75 Mary and Robert J. Konz Squires Jr. ’88 SENIOR ASSOCIATES Heather L. Callahan ’02 Kimberly M. Koro ’86 Susanne Stanford ’75 Sophie Minc and William G. Lynne M. ’88 and Peggy A. ’79 and Thomas L. Leen David M. Rubin and Todd F. Baumgaertner ’75 Glenn R. Carlson Stanley W. Legro Stevens ’88 Susan and Alan K. Brubaker ’76 Professor Nancy Carol Carter Ravi K. Lumpkin ’00 George G. Strong Jr. ’74 James S. Copley Foundation Sandra Ciallella ’87 and Elizabeth ’82 and Richard Christine and Stephen A. Cynthia Chihak and The Kenneth Shurko Macgurn ’77 Tanner ’75 Honorable Steven R. Professor Laurence Claus William P. Matz LL.M. ’82 Athena Shudde ’77 and Chester Denton ’75 Eve M. Coddon ’86 Kathy M. and Michael R. A. Teklinski ’77 Jane Trevor Fetter and Alec L. Cory McDonnell ’67 Marie and Francis J. Tepedino ’74 Thompson Fetter ’67 Julianne D’Angelo Fellmeth ’83 Gayle and James B. McKenna Lynn and Mark K. Thomas ’80 Ann Miller and Benjamin A. and Professor Robert Fellmeth Donna M. and Gerald L. Marcy ’79 and Steven R. Haddad ’80 Beth and Thomas M. McMahon ’64 Toscher ’79 Denise M. Hickey ’94 and Diachenko ’89 Carolyn Wormser Medina Sandra M. ’77 and Steven M. Christopher J. Soares Christina and Richard J. Nikki and Joel S. Miliband ’77 Wagner ’77 Alice and Harri J. Keto ’76 Doren ’86 Jeanne W. and Ralph G. Miller ’58 Kathy P. ’81 and James T. The Kroha Family Stephen S. English ’98 Lisa S. Miller-Roche ’85 and Waring ’73 Kathryn Maas Hattox ’74 Nancy and Brian Fellmeth Tom Roche Valerie and Michael J. Weaver ’73 Professor Janet and Jim Madden Marian N. and Professor M. Karen M. and Steven R. Catherine A. and The Honorable Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Carr Ferguson Mitchell ’95 Thomas J. Whelan ’65 Savitch LLP Marla Sue and Gordon L. M. Ruth and James F. Mulvaney Women’s Law Caucus Renae Fish and Gerson ’76 Joanne T. and A. John Gary Redenbacher Susan Westover-Giali ’90 and Murphy Jr. ’75 AFFILIATES Judy and Gary W. Schons ’76 Dale J. Giali ’90 The Honorable Gilbert Nares ’67 Jacqueline R. Bevins-Pack ’00 and Silldorf, Shinnick & Ryan LLP Francine S. and Phillip L. Virginia C. Nelson ’79 and Joshua Pack Jonathan Steer ’01 Ginsburg ’76 Mark Andrews Megan E. Callan ’03 Peter O. Glaessner ’80 Nancy A. and William H. Clark L. Davidson ’01 ASSOCIATES Patricia E. Gould ’78 and Nieman ’80 Cindy M. and Guy McRoskey Anonymous Rodger D. Lippa Loretta and J. Darryl Nyznyk ’77 ’00 LL.M.T ’02 Anonymous Michaela K. and Daniel W. Carol S. and Robert L. Anonymous Grindle ’73 O’Connell ’73 Counselors Anonymous Deborah McMurray and Patrick O’Day ’77 Anonymous Vickie Lynn Bibro ’90 and David N. Guedry ’86 Teresa O’Rourke and Derek K. Aberle ’96 John H. Abbott ’90 Beverly and Stephen F. Halsey ’78 David Cantrell Wendy T. and Mark B. Aldrich ’97 Anzalone & Associates, Inc. Nancy A. and Stephen D. Kim and Steven J. Parsons ’75 American Board of Trial Donna Lee and G. Hartman ’73 Nan and Professor Richard Advocates Edward Arledge ’73 Trevin Hartwell C. Pugh Susan and Thomas H. Ault ’72 Lynn D. and Geoffrey H. Susan and Professor Paul E. Robinson ’73 Susan J. Barricella ’97 Ashworth ’76 Walter Heiser Lisa K. and Larry D. The Honorable Patricia D. ’74 Lenore Lang and Professor Linda A. and Kent W. Hildreth Rosenstein ’76 and Donald Benke Carl A. Auerbach ’76 LL.M.T ’84 Anne and Hallen D. Rosner ’83 Joseph E. Berg III ’72 R. Kent Bailey ’01 Raymond B. Hom ’01 Susan and Marc L. Sands ’87 Janice F. Mulligan ’81 and Harvey William Curtis Barnes Jr. ’89 William H. Hoover ’82 Marjorie and The Honorable H. C. Berger ’82 Deborah W. and Robert S. Nancy and Timothy R. Howe ’96 Lee Sarokin Patricia and Mark A. Barry Jr. ’75 Beth and Robert Huston ’93 Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek Bonenfant ’78 Liz and Richard M. Bartell ’75 Linda W. and John A. Jurata Jr. ’00 Candace M. and Thomas E. Kristin M. and Ardwin E. Joan E. Bowes Suzanne and Samuel J. Kahn Sharkey ’59 Boyer Jr. ’80 The Honorable Louisa S. Porter Joan and Professor Yale Kamisar Dee and Professor Robert L. The Honorable Irma E. Gonzalez ’77 and David W. Brennan The Honorable Leon S. Kaplan Simmons and Robert S. Brewer ’75 LL.M. ’03 Patricia A. and Edward T. Keating Reatha and Owen Smith Nancy W. ’85 and Henry Brown

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 49 honor roll

Kimberly A. ’90 and Lynne Lasry ’80 and Barristers Michel J. Duquella ’94 Eric M. Byrens Professor Allen Snyder William A. Eddy ’92 Debbie and C. Patrick Tamara and D. Marc Lyde ’88 Anonymous Anna J. and Merlin L. Eelkema ’79 Callahan III ’76 Nancy L. and Thomas D. Susan L. and The Honorable Donna L. Freeman ’80 and Cathryn Campbell Mauriello ’88 Anthony L. Abbatangelo ’90 Gene F. Erbin ’80 Marianne R. and John M. John J. McCabe Jr. ’67 Susan C. and Michael R. The Honorable Frank F. Fasel ’68 Carson ’88 Timothy J. McGarry ’85 Adkins ’73 Karen and G. Ronald Feenberg ’70 Sharron A. Coleman Kathleen G. McGuinness ’77 Maureen J. Arrigo ’83 and Maria Cristina and Sergio Feria ’82 Kim and Michael A. Connor ’96 James J. McMullen Jr. ’80 Paul Ward Karen J. and Victor J. Ferrette ’79 Barry M. Crane ’77 Patricia A. McQuater ’78 Patricia K. Atwill ’85 Jeannette Filippone ’03 and Susan L. and K. David Cindy M. and Guy McRoskey Peter R. Ayer Jr. ’75 Thor Stibor Crockett ’91 ’00 LL.M.T ’02 Danilo Ballecer ’94 Julie and David H. Forstadt ’83 Patrick W. Daniels ’97 George M. Means II ’88 The Honorable Andrew P. Matthew M. Frank ’93 Laurel E. Davis ’87 Maureen M. and John K. Banks ’80 Anna and Stanley S. Frankfurt ’85 Lauren A. and Albert V. Mirau ’76 Linda L. ’93 and Professor The Honorable Patricia Garcia ’89 DeLeon ’76 Phyllis and Professor Craig B. Barkacs ’81 Gary B. Gelfand ’74 Nikki J. and Louie V. Grant H. Morris Dorine Ann and Douglas H. Bruce M. Ginsburg ’75 Delorie Jr. ’80 Jacqueline and David A. Barker ’80 Marina and Robin W. Marilyn L. and Dennis K. Niddrie ’79 Cynthia and Timothy S. Barker ’76 Goodenough ’66 Diemoz ’69 Mark W. Norman ’90 Shelley A. and Richard A. Dom W. Greco ’72 Craig D. Dingwall ’82 Belinda K. Orem ’81 Bayer ’83 Patti and Paul C. Guzik ’79 Ellen E. Hunter and Richard Michael D. Padilla ’75 Nancy L. Beattie ’91 John Peter Gyben ’80 P. Edwards Richard A. Paul Nancy Lee and Robert W. Kathy and The Honorable Karen A. and Daniel F. Fears ’83 Barry M. Plotkin ’71 Beck ’75 Louis R. Hanoian ’80 Shirley E. and The Honorable M. Susan Quinn ’77 Breta and Ronald I. Beck ’78 Susan M. and William J. Harris ’85 James D. Floyd ’66 Wendy Santino and Craig A. Lance K. Beizer ’75 Birt Harvey Elizabeth and David Froman ’77 Ramseyer ’81 Erin J. Bydalek and W. Professor Jane L. Henning Sharon and Gary B. Gelfand ’74 Stephanie and Reggie Reighley Patrick Bengtsson ’85 Margaret D. ’81 and Sidney Lisa and Bruce M. Ginsburg ’75 Linda S. and Robert T. Rosen ’79 Ann and Frederick M. Boss ’77 N. Herman Linda Medley and Michael Steven J. Rothans Denise E. Botticelli ’77 and Barbara Herrin Goldstein ’80 Allison R. and Thomas W. Peter Pickslay The Honorable James H. James R. Goodwin ’69 Rutledge ’75 Frank A. Bottini ’94 Herrin ’70 Leslie and Robert J. Hanna ’75 Gloria P. Samson Renee M. and James J. Patric Hooper ’73 Amy P. ’96 and Terry J. Stella M. and Paul F. Schimley ’81 Brown Jr. ’91 Sharon L. and Ronald R. Hellenkamp ’86 Lynn and John L. Shane ’68 William E. Brown ’64 House ’64 Professor Gail Heriot Robert A. Sheinbein ’78 Dianna K. and Paul P. Cara D. Hutson ’92 Jane Holman Alan Sieroty Cannariato ’70 Kris H. Ikejiri ’80 Timothy R. Howe ’96 Becki and Miguel A. Smith ’87 Linda L. and Ronald M. Joel L. Incorvaia ’79 Jean and J. Michael Hughes ’67 Natalie Venezia ’84 and Carlson ’77 Robert G. Johnson Jr. ’73 Alice K. and George E. Paul Sager Elizabeth H. and John C. Carson Kelly Julie Ann Carleton and Hurley Jr. ’88 Elizabeth W. Walker ’84 A. Joseph Chandler ’99 Robert J. Kaplan ’81 John Bucher Real Estate Co., Inc. Maureen and Christopher P. Sheryl R. and Robert P. Ruth K. and Thomas T. Dorothy N. and Allan K. Jonas Wesierski ’78 Cheney Jr. ’80 Kawakami ’86 Rosalyn Baxter and Karen M. and Edward F. Aubree L. ’05 and Craig P. Denise and John P. Kochis ’75 The Honorable Napoleon A. Whittler ’74 Cherney ’96 Melinda M. and Scott M. Jones Jr. ’71 Professor Mary Jo and Steven J. Cologne ’84 Koppel ’83 Andrew B. Kaplan ’84 Donald Wiggins Christopher A. Cooley ’97 Claudia and Neil L. Krupnick ’72 Nancy N. ’79 Kennerly and Alex P. Wilczynski ’81 Janet Courtney-Smith Janice N. and Geoffrey B. Mark A. Miller Carrie R. ’77 and Wayne H. Jack R. Dailey ’04 Lanning ’76 Debra D. and Robert V. Wilson, Jr. Genevieve and Matthew R. Randi and Douglas D. Law ’83 LaBerge ’76 Shari K. and Robert H. Desmond ’86 Jane G. and Professor August Larsen Ziprick ’76 Julie and Richard DiNapoli ’81 Herbert I. Lazerow Marie E. and Christopher J. Julie A. Leeds ’87 Duenow ’93

50 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Nichole S. ’99 and Peter J. Michael J. Roberts ’69 Jan Elizabeth and Edward W. Leeson ’99 Professors Leslie Oster and Wachtel ’73 Daniel J. Lickel ’02 Daniel B. Rodriguez Nancy A. and Robert L. The Honorable Tina ’74 and The Michael R. Rogers ’68 Wallan ’86 Honorable Joe Littlejohn ’74 Patricia L. and William J. Katherine E. and The Honorable Michael J. Long ’84 Rogers ’73 Timothy R. Walsh ’91 Marcia A. and The Honorable Amy J. LL.M.T ’88 and John Daniel W. Watkins ’86 M. James Lorenz L. Romaker Mary Lundberg and M. Howard Teddie and Jon H. Lyons ’72 Barbara Zucker and Steven M. Wayne ’72 Gerald Maliszewski ’94 Romanoff ’87 Elizabeth P. ’00 and Mark R. Linda T. Maramba ’85 and Susan C. ’82 and Steven K. Roney Weinstein ’97 Steve M. McDaneld Faye H. ’90 and Richard L. Russell Mary V. and Peter Weinstein ’74 Debra K. ’82 and David Maurer Georgia and Blair L. Sadler Diane K. and Anthony M. Daral B. Mazzarella ’86 Sally A. and James G. Sandler ’75 Wetherbee ’72 Kathleen P. and J. Michael Debra and Scott R. Santerre ’76 Professor Charles Wiggins McDade ’68 Christine R. and Daniel C. Silva Barnard and Timothy N. Leslie A. McDonell ’88 Santo ’66 Will ’85 Roberta J. and Roger C. Louise Marie and D. Rickard Susan B. Hall Williams ’82 and McKee ’68 Santwier ’69 Michael T. Williams ’82 Hugh M. McNeely ’75 Shari and Frederick Schenk ’78 Andrew P. Wilson ’72 Edwin F. McPherson ’82 Professor Maimon Schwarzschild Sherry L. and David J. Winkler ’78 Suzanne and John J. Alan Sieroty Christine and Robert A. Wohl ’60 McQuaide ’72 Lorri A. ’89 and Timothy J. Amy M. Wood ’03 Debra R. and Raymond J. Silverman ’89 Gay Zide ’91 Mercado ’75 Deborah and Franco Simone ’92 Moira Catherine and Brian E. Catherine T. Smith ’98 Advocates Michaels ’68 Nancy L. Smoke ’77 Anonymous Mark E. Milett ’82 The Honorable Stephanie Anonymous Barbara S. and Edwin L. Miller Jr. Sontag ’83 Anonymous Jilana L. Miller ’96 Elizabeth V. ’75 and Justus C. Lori Abbott Moreland ’80 Professor Mary-Rose and William Spillner III ’75 Karin and Addison K. Adams ’96 K. Mueller ’78 Sue F. Steding ’75 Margaret H. Adams ’01 and Mary Mullenbach Hooper ’73 Rand E. Sterling ’75 Brad Hays Sharon and Richard A. Catherine A. ’69 and Terry J. ’83 and Grant Adamson Munson ’77 The Honorable Ted Stevens Sarah Mersereau and Ernest Professor Heather and Ryan A. David G. Steward ’91 E. Adler ’76 Murr ’98 Marguerite S. Strand ’89 Jacki and John Adler Nicole Nakaji James W. Street ’68 Deirdre and Michael Alfred ’83 William E. O’Nell ’96 Corrine H. and James J. Patti J. and John R. Allender ’75 Laurel A. Olson ’76 Thomson Jr. ’76 Terry McEntee and Keith D. Anthony J. Pace ’69 Christie and Steven G. Toole ’75 Allred ’82 The Honorable Gary L. Paden ’76 Marie and The Honorable Robert Mildred and Victor Allstead Jeanne M. and John T. Palazzo ’79 J. Trentacosta ’79 Cirrus A. Alpert ’04 Eugene A. Patrizio ’95 Susan Obeji and Henry W. Phillip Altfest ’66 Christine and Philip S. Pesin ’99 Tubbs III ’81 Nancy Lee and Robert O. Tina M. Pivonka ’79 Sharon C. and John L. Amador ’82 Professor Theresa Player Vanderslice ’86 Amy Baird and Richard R. Laurie S. ’90 and Bruce D. Nuria Montserrat and The Ames ’96 Poole ’90 Honorable Luis R. Vargas ’81 Natalie and Alfredo Andere Kathleen Mary and Kevin M. Patricia S. and James J. Veach ’72 MCL ’87 Rapp ’91 Sandra J. and Joseph A. Catherine R. and Stevan C. Rich ’85 Vinatieri ’77 John J. Arens ’95 Gary A. Richwald

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 51 honor roll

David H. Arnold ’95 Kelli D. ’95 LL.M.T ’96 and Sierra J. Damm ’04 Gail Atkinson ’85 Jeffrey R. Brown Patricia Damy Wood and James Peter J. Attarian Jr. ’85 Thomas J. Bryan Jr. ’72 M. Wood ’94 Mary Frances and Kenneth English R. and Joel R. Bryant ’90 Dianna M. Davis ’83 R. Augst Glenn E. Buberl ’02 Mark A. Davis ’82 Robert M. Augst ’04 John P. Bucher ’71 Robin L. ’97 and Gary W. Deems Peter Aylward Laurelann LL.M.T ’93 and Mallary K. DeMerlier ’99 Kelli J. and Bruce W. Baker ’82 Warner P. Bundens Terri A. ’84 and Todd A. Melinda J. and Marvin D. Baker Professor Karen C. Burke DeMitchell Beverly Ann and Steve R. Beverly W. and Douglas D. Leslie C. ’87 and David Balash Jr. ’68 Busch ’72 B. Detwiler Tracy and Kris T. Ballard ’91 Irene P. and Robert K. Tien V. Doan LL.M. ’88 Vicki Lynne and Mark H. Butterﬁeld Jr. ’77 Cindy Dobler Davis ’93 and Barber ’78 Donna S. and Charles A. Byler ’75 Donald P. Davis Nancy H. and David Z. Bark ’86 Martha ’84 and Jim Bywater Vivian N. ’89 and Joseph Elena M. ’82 and Peter J. Barrett Mary Michlin and Clarence H. J. Doering ’81 LL.M.T ’87 Campbell III ’64 Lauri and Thomas W. Steve Barrow Lisa and Eric Campbell ’93 Dominick ’85 Carol Kuhl and Timothy M. Donna K. and Joseph A. The Honorable Donal B. Barry ’79 Canedo ’63 Donnelly ’81 Jane K. Meyers and Bradley A. Vanessa C. and Steven J. Carroll Austin Dove ’94 Bartlett ’80 ’74 LL.M.G ’86 Linda B. Dubroof ’80 and Steven B. Bassoff ’76 Rosa E. and The Honorable Tom McGinni Trudy A. and David A. Federico Castro ’71 Marc Dudey Bateman ’69 Wilbert F. Chan ’68 Barbara A. and Patrick J. David W. Baumgarten ’95 Iona and Alan H. Charmatz ’79 Duffy III ’86 Ann G. ’85 and Roger Behar Ann B. Chase ’84 Edmund A. Duggan ’69 Lauren G. ’02 and Paul Belger Anita M. and Michael S. Child ’78 Gordon E. Dunfee ’79 Janice Bellucci Dunn ’82 Pamela Wen and Robert W. Sonia Peterson and Thomas G. Dess A. Benedetto ’00 Chong ’93 Dunnwald ’82 Susan S. Benson Candace A. Wilkins and Donald Mary K. and Robert J. Eatinger Professor Laura M. Berend ’75 L. Christensen ’76 Jr. ’82 Susan M. Bernhardi ’85 Judith C. ’89 and Donald J. Clark Bobbe and Gary L. Edwards ’72 Dianne and William J. Bianco ’90 Jerry D. Cluff ’73 Janine M. and Carl J. Eging Kathleen and Timothy R. Binder Robert A. Cocchia ’94 Jacqueline Gigi Emanuel ’77 LL.M. ’82 Catherine Y. Travers and Jamie L. and Gary M. Stacey K. and Robert M. Steven M. Cohn ’79 Erickson LL.M.T ’92 Birndorf ’78 Kristin L. Connor ’98 Shawn J. Ervin ’95 Joyce A. and Charles A. Bleiler ’73 Phyllis and Fred C. Conrad Jr. ’60 Ana M. Escobar ’88 and James Russell T. Boggs ’03 James Conran B. Miles Bruce N. Bole ’79 Patricia A. and Thomas E. Ana L. Espana ’82 and Jeffrey Yoko and James R. Bostwick Jr. Courtney ’88 Michael Reilly ’73 LL.M.G ’02 Sandra Cramblet Cox and Shirley H. and Oliver E. Estes ’61 Ruth and K. George Bournazian David L. Cox Susan I. Etezadi ’83 Terri and John Boyce Jr. ’85 Guylyn R. ’85 and Scott Suzanne F. ’94 and Susan M. Brake ’03 C. Cummins Ronald J. Evans Stacie L. Brandt ’93 Patricia Ann and Howard G. Beverley L. and Michael R. Georgine F. Brave ’83 Curtis II ’77 Fehrenbacher ’75 Patricia and Edward R. Brien ’68 Carol Hackett and Dennis W. Linda Campbell and Arthur Elizabeth Evelyn Hunter and Daley ’76 Feingold ’73 Brett A. Broge ’02 Professor Lynne Dallas Barbara and Robin Felix ’96 Penny and Professor Roy Clinton Dalton Louis F. Filosa II ’85 L. Brooks Margaret A. ’94 and Rex Dalton

52 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Jennifer and Campbell H. Kendra J. ’93 and Kevin J. Hall Sharon S. and John C. Jarboe ’71 Bonnie J. and Kenneth E. Finlay ’92 Scott M. Hall ’88 April M. ’93 and Robert Lange ’77 Patricia R. Fisher-Smith Welsh Maureen F. Hallahan ’81 M. Johnson Nicole Wilkenson and David M. Ann E. and The Honorable Elizabeth Hufker Hallett ’84 and Susan A. Markham and LaSpaluto ’00 Jules E. Fleuret ’73 Bruce M. Hallett Benjamin E. Johnson ’91 Marita M. ’98 and Joseph Robert G. Foote ’70 Howard L. Halm ’68 Lori L. and Robert M. Juskie ’89 J. Lauinger Christie D. Foster-Horn ’78 and Frances M. and Robert E. Mitchell M. Kam ’91 Joanne Higgins Leslie ’76 and Richard J. Horn Halpern ’69 Robert Kamangar ’92 John W. Leslie Lynn A. and Richard R. Max A. Hansen ’76 Robin P. Kandell ’95 Paul F. Levin ’74 Freeland ’75 Paul G. Hanson III ’82 Esther and Lawrence J. Kaplan ’75 Harmon B. Levine ’80 Sandra L. Fuhrman ’78 Edna and Alexander A. Harper ’63 Michael B. Kaye ’77 Kam W. Li ’81 Christine ’00 LL.M.T ’03 and Paula ’93 and Anthony Harrelson Brian P. Keighron ’76 William F. Lightner ’91 Benjamin Galdston ’00 Frances L. Harrison ’81 William G. Kelley ’79 S. Deborah Lim ’82 Betty Ann and Glenn J. Joseph L. Harrison ’74 Keith Kelly ’00 Ann K. Linnehan ’97 Gamboa ’70 Steven P. Haskett ’75 Pam and Professor Michael Roger K. Litman ’73 Lilia E. Garcia ’81 and Victor M. Linda E. Castro and Jeffrey A. B. Kelly Dianna W. and John B. Little ’75 Nunez ’82 Hatﬁeld LL.M.T ’85 Stacy M. Kelly ’99 Michael D. Liuzzi ’80 LL.M. ’83 Laurie and Gary F. Garland ’88 Ruth Mary and William H. Robert L. Kenny ’84 Andrea K. ’98 and Thomas M. Roy B. Garrett ’69 Haubert II ’75 Rosemary O. and John O. Lockhart ’74 Susan M. and Don W. Gilbert ’82 Charles R. Hawkey III ’91 Kent ’71 Allison and Randall C. Lococo ’91 Ruth A. Gilbert ’80 Judy and Edgar H. Hayden Jr. ’70 Philip D. Kerig Mary Joann and Anthony Marcia and The Honorable Suzanne M. Henry ’99 Daniel J. Kessler ’91 Lovett ’71 David M. Gill Cindy Aarons and Craig D. Joyce and Craig P. Keup ’87 Gerarda and R. Dennis Steven E. Gillis ’78 Higgs ’69 Richard Kim ’95 Luderer ’74 Gregory J. Giotta ’84 Jeffrey C. Rodman and Michele A. Kiraly ’93 Tina and The Honorable Pamela N. and Daniel J. Adrienne Hirt Mike and Barb Kissane Thomas L. Ludington ’79 Gleason ’91 William H. Hitt ’70 Linda R. and Keith J. Klein ’84 Karen and Michael D. Lurie ’93 Marc Matys and Robert H. Kevin J. Hoffman ’80 Steven L. Klug ’81 LL.M. ’83 Veronica Y. Ma LL.M.T ’99 Gleason ’98 Arlene E. and Steven J. Monica Z. and Christopher Anne L. MacArthur ’76 Betty J. and William E. Gnass ’71 Hoffman ’72 Knight ’77 Diane A. and Thomas E. Patricia and Douglas E. Nick Hogan ’00 Frederick A. Knorr III ’81 Maddox ’78 Godbe ’76 Sheila P. and Edward L. Holly ’92 Debra B. ’79 and Jay Koehler John C. Malugen Georgia and Michael S. Carol A. and William D. Lisa A. Kokenge-Sharpe ’91 and James A. Mangione ’81 Goergen ’81 Holman ’69 David R. Sharpe Shirley and Henry R. Mann ’67 Diane and Russell A. Gold ’95 James R. Homola ’73 Nicholas N. Kraushaar ’73 Sharon and Jack I. Mann ’74 Denise Clare and Joel C. Sylvia and Steven C. Honse ’95 Kathryn and Alan N. Kreida ’80 Joy S. and Steven J. Marietti ’96 Golden ’70 Margaret B. and Michael E. Sheryl and Joel Krissman ’73 Diane and James S. Marinos ’58 David Goldin Hooton ’75 Barbara E. Kristal ’84 Ditty and M. Daniel Markoff ’73 Sherry Deskins and Brett Julie and Darrell C. Hoyle Catharine Kroger-Diamond Sharon A. Marshall ’83 Goodson ’76 Caroline and The Honorable LL.M.G ’94 Debra L. and Paul B. Martins ’79 James S. Gordon ’76 Richard Huffman Diane and Robert J. Krup ’73 Gregory S. Mason ’90 Beverly and Donn H. Goss ’64 The Honorable Colette M. ’84 Edward H. Kubo Jr. ’79 Patrick A. Matthews ’91 Trisha Takido and Geoffrey A. and Kyle J. Humphrey Hubert H. Kuo ’99 The Honorable Robert E. Graves ’94 Nellie and Charles M. Jennifer C. Kurlan ’98 and Jeffrey May ’70 Gloria Marie and The Honorable Hungerford ’75 P. Sutton ’98 Susan K. Mazza ’89 Alvin E. Green Jr. ’73 Mary E. and George W. Hunt ’68 Eugene L. Kusion ’79 Nancy Joan and Russell J. Debra Greenﬁeld ’74 Kimberly and Robert P. Alexandra M. Kwoka LL.M.T ’02 Mazzola ’73 Toni Diane Donnet and Huntoon ’90 John S. Kyle Jr. ’98 Sandra K. ’88 and James McBeth Professor Allen M. Gruber Maria D. and Lawrence E. Ivey ’82 Edward H. Laber ’85 James M. McCabe ’71 Leonila and Jose R. Guerrero ’80 S. Alva ’86 and Vance R. Joyce A. Lamb ’90 and John Janice and Robert H. McCall ’85 Alexis S. Gutierrez ’97 Jahnes-Smith ’86 D. Morris Elizabeth L. McClutchey ’92 Beverly and Roger Haines, Jr. Karen A. ’87 and Edward Alex L. Landon ’71 Joyce A. McCoy ’77 James M. Hall ’79 R. Jantzen Donald P. Lang ’70

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 53 honor roll

Carol R. and The Honorable James E. O’Neal ’64 Wanda W. and Robert E. Rose ’91 Candace M. Carroll and Harry R. McCue ’66 Marilyn P. and Clement J. David M. Rosenthal ’92 Leonard B. Simon Susan and John F. McGowan ’93 O’Neill III ’63 Steven J. Rosenthal ’80 Natalie J. and Andrew D. Kathleen J. McKee ’91 Linda B. ’80 and David R. Lynell J. and John L. Ross ’86 Simons ’88 Sandra L. McMahan Irwin ’79 Oliver,Jr. Teresa and Carlos C. Ruan ’92 Jean Luc Sinniger MCL ’88 Elizabeth E. McManus ’85 Sarah L. Overton ’92 Donald H. Rubin ’72 Elizabeth A. Skane ’96 and Jacqueline P. McManus ’86 and Denise Eurey and Terry R. Jilien J. Rubin ’92 Ryan Clive-Smith Robert G. Reid Owens ’79 Toby E. ’78 and Robert Rubin ’78 Debra P. and Randall L. Skeen ’80 Paul D. McNulty Jeannine Pacioni ’90 and Elvia and The Honorable Dana B. and Gary M. Slavett ’96 Kevin M. McPhee ’99 Jeffery Nale Harold V. Rucker ’74 Mary A. Smigielski ’93 and Alicia I. ’04 and Jeremey Mead Carlene Taubert and Mark D. Beverly Ann and Robert G. Gregory A. Barnes Gabriel ’84 Mendham and Parker ’80 Russell Jr. ’75 Merina L. and Steven D. Smith Stephen Chuck Cynthia A. and Russell O. Ron Russo Thomas A. Smith Marco B. Mercaldo ’98 Parkman ’82 Kevin T. Ryan ’80 Jeanese E. and Jeffrey A. Mary Towne and John W. Professors Laura S. Adams and Elizabeth A. Ryner ’92 Snyder ’90 Merritt ’76 Frank Partnoy Cheril Edwards and Larry A. Pamela J. ’83 and James E. Carol A. Micken ’77 Lori ’79 and Jeffrey Partrick Sackey ’72 Spain IV ’79 Kim and Cary W. Miller ’74 Cary C. Payne LL.M.T ’89 Jay B. Sacks ’79 Nila J. and Jerry D. Spencer ’79 Jon C. Milliken LL.M.G ’91 Camille A. Perna LL.M.T ’04 Terry West and Thomas N. Dean A. Spizzirri ’93 Margo and Professor John Mai M. Petersen ’00 Saldin ’74 Nancy Stansell-Swanson and H. Minan Robert G. Petrovich ’78 Laurie and Victor M. Salerno ’77 Craig D. Swanson ’85 M. Diane Litten and J. Peter Susan J. and Dana W. Phillips ’76 Maria and William R. Salisbury ’84 Francie M. and Donald J. Mohn ’67 Christine A. and Donald M. Phillip C. Samouris ’92 Starchman ’74 Martina Gruyters and Marcel Pilger ’90 Heather M. and Charles P. Gean A. Steinhoff ’85 J. Molins Jane and The Honorable Sandel ’85 Catherine A. ’83 and Professor Jean and George Michael Pirosh ’68 Margaret T. Sandke ’94 Clarence E. Stephenson E. Montoya Penny and Gary W. Powell ’75 Dawnmarie I. ’96 and Jan and Richard G. Lynn and The Honorable Paula and Peter A. Quint ’74 Michael Saunders Stephenson ’75 David B. Moon Jr. ’67 Philip L. Raffee ’71 Bettie and Richard L. Sax ’77 Debra M. and Eddie Still ’81 Susan B. and William A. Annette M. and Robert T. Cynthia M. and David G. Candace M. Stone ’87 Moore Jr. ’72 Ramos ’94 Schlaudecker ’75 Linda and The Honorable Lisa J. and Damon C. Mosler ’90 Professor Lisa P. Ramsey Danielle M. ’89 and John Schulte Richard Strauss ’68 Stephen A. Munkelt ’77 Professor Michael D. Ramsey Harriet and Alan Schumacher Michelle Lynn and Robert D. Dena J. ’95 and Shaun K. Murphy Pamela J. ’93 and Scott M. Rand Rosemary P. and Richard R. Strauss ’92 Susan B. ’85 and Michael Susan L. Rapp ’75 Schwabe ’83 David Stringer ’74 David Murphy Laura K. and Jose H. Razo ’76 Mary Patrice and John J. Yolanda and Robb M. Strom ’85 Celeste Brightwell and Fredrick Katherine Strub and John W. Scully ’74 Garrett H. Suemori ’77 J. Nameth ’68 Reed ’72 Julette A. and Reginald M. Patrick Q. Sullivan ’95 Joseph J. Nardulli ’73 Martha Kelley and James J. Sealey ’82 Adam J. Susz ’03 Elizabeth M. and Craig S. Nelson Rees ’76 Jane Spencer and John J. Jennifer C. Kurlan ’98 and LL.M.G ’94 Laureen J. Gray Reid ’69 and Sears ’73 Jeffrey P. Sutton ’98 Maria K. Nelson ’91 R.M. Reid Kathleen W. Selvidge ’84 Susan I. Swander ’79 Van N. Nguy ’04 Debra L. LL.M.G ’90 and Deborah L. Davis and Michael E. Nancy Stansell-Swanson and Nancy V. Nieto ’95 Michael C. Reilly Shames ’83 Craig D. Swanson ’85 Doris A. and The Honorable Donald G. Rez Sandor W. Shapery ’71 William Szczepaniak ’77 Randal J. Nigg ’74 Catherine A. Richardson ’88 Barry K. Shelton ’98 Debbie C. and Sam K. Holly J. ’88 and Robert E. Nolan John G. Rickenbrode ’03 Gretchen ’00 and Patrick J. Tahmassebi ’00 Professor Virginia Nolan Linda S. and Kneave Riggall Shipley ’00 Maj-le Tate Bridges ’95 W. Patrick Noonan ’73 LL.M.T ’87 Eleanor A. and Jack P. Shoemaker Timothy J. Tatro ’94 Debra Ann and Nathan C. Kenneth G. Roberts ’81 Larry A. Shoffner ’75 Joyce C. and Gregory S. Northup ’79 Rossana and James D. Robinson Professor Virginia V. Shue ’72 Tavill ’87 Elizabeth and Peter K. Nunez ’70 ’84 LL.M.T ’87 Louise D. Shutler ’78 Shannon N. Taylor ’94 Lilia E. Garcia ’81 and Victor M. John L. Rogitz ’89 Donna L. Silverberg ’90 Susan A. and T. Leigh Taylor Nunez ’82

54 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE John D. Thelan ’74 Robin L. and Lester F. CLASS OF 1962 Nathan D. Thomas ’04 Wilkinson Jr. ’81 John L. Nichols Dina T. and Barry J. Thompson ’90 Blair W. Will ’00 Lauri S. Thompson-Bracken ’98 Candace C. and G. James CLASS OF 1963 Sheila A. and John T. Thornton ’80 Williams Jr. ’77 Joseph A. Canedo Pamela and Henry W. Tom Benetta Buell and Barry S. Alexander A. Harper LL.M.T ’85 Wilson ’99 Clement J. O’Neill III Victor M. Torres ’88 Kerry R. and Randall L. Winet ’84 Brooke J. and Richard E. Toscano Margaret and Bruce H. CLASS 0F 1964 Kathryn Turner-Arsenault ’93 and Winkelman ’86 William E. Brown Arthur A. Arsenault Charles B. Witham ’98 Clarence H. Campbell III Mark N. Uhlfelder ’82 LL.M.T ’84 Caroline Rentto and Emil J. Donn H. Goss Ceres M. and Paul F. Uhlir ’83 Wohl ’94 Ronald R. House Katherine ’97 and Donald J. Professor Christopher Wonnell Albert A. Koch Umpleby III Patricia Damy Wood and James Gerald L. McMahon Hilary M. and Jeffrey A. Unger M. Wood ’94 James E. O’Neal LL.M.T ’97 Ray H. Wood ’75 S. Charles Wickersham Professor Edmund Ursin Mitchell R. Woodbury ’71 Michael A. Van Horne LL.M.T ’86 Carolyn J. and Edgar R. CLASS OF 1965 Susan C. and Charles F. Worth ’72 William D. Blank Vandegrift ’73 Karen L. Wullich ’81 and Walter L. McArthur Lynda and Professor Jorge A. Kenneth Herbst Thomas J. Whelan Vargas Terri M. Wyatt ’86 Nancy L. Vaughan Amy T. and Christopher Yuhl ’87 CLASS OF 1966 Julia A. Gaudio Vitting ’82 and Steven M. Zadravecz ’96 Phillip Altfest Kevin E. Vitting Uzi Zimmerman ’93 James D. Floyd Jeanne C. and Richard R. Waite ’80 Ann M. Zimmermann ’90 and Robin W. Goodenough Robin and Allen B. Walburn David Huerta Harry R. McCue LL.M.T ’95 Paul T. McDonough Glenda and Gregory S. Daniel C. Santo Joe N. Turner Walden ’80 he following recognizes Janette Mary Allen and James T A. Ward ’91 by constituent group those CLASS OF 1967 Thompson Fetter Cily R. and Jeffrey A. who contributed to the USD Warﬁeld ’96 J. Michael Hughes Ani and Kenneth B. Wassner ’71 School of Law during the Charles E. Jones Diane K. ’76 and Walter 2004–2005 ﬁscal year. Henry R. Mann Watanabe John J. McCabe Jr. Thomas D. Waylett ’97 Alumni Michael R. McDonnell Barbara J. and Daniel S. J. Peter Mohn Weber ’78 David B. Moon Jr. CLASS OF 1958 Glenn H. Wechsler ’84 Gilbert Nares James S. Marinos Sharon Sackin and Marc M. Ralph G. Miller Weisel ’70 CLASS OF 1968 Adam A. Welland ’03 Steve R. Balash Jr. CLASS OF 1959 Jan S. Wendler LL.M.C ’02 Edward R. Brien Thomas E. Sharkey Jean C. and The Honorable Norbert R. Bunt Duncan S. Werth II ’71 Wilbert F. Chan CLASS OF 1960 Joan and Professor Richard J. Michael S. Evans Fred C. Conrad Jr. Wharton ’73 Frank F. Fasel Robert A. Wohl Anna L. and Paul S. Howard L. Halm Whipple Jr. ’73 George W. Hunt CLASS OF 1961 Lan C. Wiborg Robert Janovici Oliver E. Estes Charles R. Khoury Jr.

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 55 honor roll

Robert R. Leamer John C. Jarboe Daniel W. Grindle J. Michael McDade Napoleon A. Jones Jr. Stephen D. Hartman Roger C. McKee John O. Kent James R. Homola Brian E. Michaels Alex L. Landon Patric Hooper Fredrick J. Nameth Anthony Lovett Robert G. Johnson Jr. Michael Pirosh James M. McCabe Nicholas N. Kraushaar Frederick V. Riccardi Barry M. Plotkin Joel Krissman Michael R. Rogers Philip L. Raffee Robert J. Krup John L. Shane Sandor W. Shapery Roger K. Litman Richard Strauss Kenneth B. Wassner M. Daniel Markoff James W. Street Duncan S. Werth II Russell J. Mazzola Michael T. Thorsnes Mitchell R. Woodbury Mary Mullenbach Hooper Joseph J. Nardulli CLASS OF 1969 CLASS OF 1972 W. Patrick Noonan David A. Bateman Thomas H. Ault Robert L. O’Connell Dennis K. Diemoz Joseph E. Berg III Paul E. Robinson Edmund A. Duggan Thomas J. Bryan Jr. William J. Rogers Roy B. Garrett Douglas D. Busch Christopher Savage James R. Goodwin Jac A. Crawford John J. Sears Laureen J. Gray Reid Gary L. Edwards Charles F. Vandegrift Robert E. Halpern Sally M. Furay Charles P. Vitunac Craig D. Higgs John M. Gantus Edward W. Wachtel William D. Holman Dom W. Greco James T. Waring Anthony J. Pace Steven J. Hoffman Michael J. Weaver Michael J. Roberts Neil L. Krupnick Richard J. Wharton D. Rickard Santwier Joe O. Littlejohn Paul S. Whipple Jr. Catherine A. Stevens Jon H. Lyons John J. McQuaide CLASS OF 1974 CLASS OF 1970 William A. Moore Jr. John S. Adler William M. Bandt Douglas Neistat Patricia D. Benke Paul P. Cannariato John W. Reed Steven J. Carroll Hideo Chino Donald H. Rubin Donald L. Clark G. Ronald Feenberg Larry A. Sackey Samuel K. Eaton Jr. Robert G. Foote Virginia V. Shue Gary B. Gelfand Glenn J. Gamboa Raymond T. Theep Thomas R. Gill Joel C. Golden James J. Veach Debra Greenﬁeld R. Kent Harvey Jr. Thomas J. Warwick Jr. John L. Haller Edgar H. Hayden Jr. M. Howard Wayne Joseph L. Harrison James H. Herrin Anthony M. Wetherbee Arthur R. Knowlson Jr. William H. Hitt Andrew P. Wilson Mary M. Knowlson Donald P. Lang Edgar R. Worth Paul F. Levin Robert E. May Ernestine D. Littlejohn Robert Y. Nagata CLASS OF 1973 Thomas M. Lockhart Peter K. Nunez Michael R. Adkins R. Dennis Luderer Sheridan E. Reed G. Edward Arledge Kathryn Maas Hattox Lynn Schenk Charles A. Bleiler Jack I. Mann Marc M. Weisel James R. Bostwick Jr. Cary W. Miller Kenneth C. Bovard Mickey W. Mosier CLASS OF 1971 Robert H. Burgoyne Randal J. Nigg Marvin D. Baker Jerry D. Cluff Peter A. Quint John P. Bucher Arthur Feingold Harold V. Rucker Federico Castro Jules E. Fleuret Thomas N. Saldin William E. Gnass Alvin E. Green Jr. John J. Scully

56 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Law Firm Challenge Donors—Fiscal Year 2005

The Law Firm Challenge is BRANTON & WILSON APC HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES Edgar Hayden ’70 Steven Cologne ’84 & SAVITCH LLP a fundraising and networking Kent Hildreth ’76, ’84 Jo Ann Gambale ’98 Kendra Hall ’93 program for law ﬁrms with three Alexandra Kwoka ’02 Michael Gibson ’98 Maureen Hallahan ’81 John Kyle ’98 or more alumni that reconnects Camille Perna ’04, ’04 Michelle Grant ’00 David Ruth ’91, ’97 Alexis Gutierrez ’97 Kam Li ’81 graduates with the University Shannon Taylor ’94 Craig Higgs ’69 Patrick Martin ’92 Craig Ramseyer ’81 of San Diego School of Law Margaret Mangin ’84 DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY William Miller ’89 Robert Russell ’75 and their fellow alumni. We are Carrie Dolton ’04 Emily Murphy ’03 Audrey Stubenberg ’88 pleased to recognize the follow- Erin Gibson ’03 Bruce O’Brien ’986 David LaSpaluto ’00 Phillip Samouris ’92 RYAN MERCALDO & ing law ﬁrms for their leadership Eric Swenson ’96 Mark Stender ’82, ’87 WORTHINGTON Jeffrey Carvalho ’01 in this program. Ellen Van Hoften ’83 Michael Faircloth ’00 Marco Mercaldo ’98

100% Participation FOLEY & LARDNER KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR SOLOMON WARD Krause & Kalfayan Barry Wilson ’99 John Carson ’88 SEIDENWURM & SMITH, LLP Solomon Ward Seidenwurm Mallary DeMerlier ’99 (100% PARTICIPATION) & Smith, LLP GIBSON DUNN & CRUTCHER Andrew Kimmel ’02 Michael Abramson ’00, ’03 Wingert Grebing Brubaker Susan Brake ’03 Douglas Muehlhauser ’95 Michael Breslauer ’83 & Goodwin LLP Richard Doren ’86 William Nieman ’80 Lawrence Kaplan ’75 Dana Larkin ’04 John Rickenbrode ’03 Paul Metsch ’85 Most Dollars Raised Jeffrey Thomas ’82 Deborah Shepherd ’93 Elizabeth Mitchell ’99 Luce, Forward, Hamilton Sam Tahmassebi ’00 Miguel Smith ’87 & Scripps, LLP GORDON & REES, LLP John Roberts ’95 (Group A, 10+ Alumni) Jessica Cook ’03 KRAUSE & KALFAYAN (100% PARTICIPATION) Wingert Grebing Brubaker Amy Darby ’02 WINGERT GREBING & Goodwin LLP John Haller ’74 Eric Benink ’96 BRUBAKER & GOODWIN (Group B, 6–9 Alumni) James McMullen ’80 Ralph Kalfayan ’85 (100% PARTICIPATION) Krause & Kalfayan Karen Stuckey ’89 James Krause ’75 James Brown ’91 (Group C, 3–5 Alumni) Alan Brubaker ’76 HELLER EHRMAN LLP LITTLER & MENDELSON James R. Goodwin ’69 Heidi Gutierrez ’97 John Adler ’74 Robert Johnson ’86 We thank all of the firms Jilana Miller ’96 Michel Duquella ’94 Robert Juskie ’89 Ryan Murr ’98 Erik Liggins ’03 that competed in fiscal year LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON James Mangione ’81 2005 with special thanks to & SCRIPPS G. Edward Arledge ’73 the in-house alumni volunteers Dennis Doucette ’86 at each firm for championing Russell Gold ’95 Nichole Leeson ’99 the Law Annual Fund among Peter Leeson ’99 their colleagues. Susanne Stanford ’75

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 57 honor roll

Donald J. Starchman James G. Sandler Larry D. Rosenstein Sandra M. Wagner David Stringer David G. Schlaudecker Scott R. Santerre Steven M. Wagner George G. Strong Jr. Larry A. Shoffner Gary W. Schons G. James Williams Jr. Francis J. Tepedino Elizabeth V. Spillner James J. Thomson Jr. Carrie R. Wilson John D. Thelan Justus C. Spillner III Diane K. Watanabe Michael G. Zybala Peter Weinstein Susanne Stanford Judith A. Wenker Paul E. Westerman Sue F. Steding Donald T. Whitson CLASS OF 1978 Edward F. Whittler Richard G. Stephenson Robert H. Ziprick Mark H. Barber James S. Wolf Jr. Rand E. Sterling Lawrence J. Bartlett Stephen A. Tanner CLASS OF 1977 Ronald I. Beck CLASS OF 1975 Bill J. Thompson Timothy R. Binder Robert M. Birndorf John R. Allender Steven G. Toole Frederick M. Boss Mark A. Bonenfant Peter R. Ayer Jr. Jane A. (Starke) Wells Denise E. Botticelli Michael S. Child Robert S. Barry Jr. Ray H. Wood Thomas M. Buchenau Frank S. Clowney III Richard M. Bartell Robert K. Butterﬁeld Jr. Christie D. Foster-Horn William G. Baumgaertner CLASS OF 1976 Ronald M. Carlson Sandra L. Fuhrman Robert W. Beck Ernest E. Adler Barry M. Crane Paul E. Gavin Lance K. Beizer Geoffrey H. Ashworth Howard G. Curtis II Michael F. Gerace Laura M. Berend Timothy S. Barker David Froman Steven E. Gillis Robert S. Brewer Steven B. Bassoff David J. Harshman Patricia E. Gould Charles N. Brown Alan K. Brubaker Michael B. Kaye Stephen F. Halsey Philip Burkhardt C. Patrick Callahan III Christopher Knight Leslie D. High Charles A. Byler Donald L. Christensen Kenneth E. Lange Nelson H. Howe II Steven R. Denton Dennis W. Daley Skip A. LeBlang Thomas E. Maddox Michael R. Fehrenbacher Lezetta M. Davis Dennis L. Livingston Patricia A. McQuater Richard R. Freeland Albert V. De Leon Richard B. Macgurn Joseph R. Montgomery Bruce M. Ginsburg Marco A. Famiglietti Marla A. Martinez William K. Mueller Robert J. Hanna R. William Ferrante Joyce A. McCoy Robert G. Petrovich Steven P. Haskett Gordon L. Gerson Kathleen G. McGuinness James D. Poovey William H. Haubert II Phillip L. Ginsburg Carol A. Micken Robert Rubin Jack W. Hodges Douglas E. Godbe Joel S. Miliband Toby E. Rubin William M. Holzman Brett Goodson Robert J. Milis Frederick Schenk Michael E. Hooton James S. Gordon Mary E. Mix Robert A. Sheinbein Jacklyn Horton Max A. Hansen Stephen A. Munkelt James L. Shores Charles M. Hungerford James S. Heller Richard A. Munson Louise D. Shutler Steven R. Hunsicker J. Jeffrey Herman J. Darryl Nyznyk Patricia G. Tilley Lawrence J. Kaplan Kent W. Hildreth Patrick O’Day Daniel S. Weber Webster B. Kinnaird Brian P. Keighron Charles H. Paul Christopher P. Wesierski Henry Klein Harri J. Keto Louisa S. Porter J. Michael Wilson John P. Kochis Kevin M. Killacky Francis X. Pray David J. Winkler James C. Krause Robert V. LaBerge M. Susan Quinn John B. Little Geoffrey B. Lanning Roberta J. Robinson CLASS OF 1979 Hugh M. McNeely Anne L. MacArthur Victor M. Salerno Timothy M. Barry Raymond J. Mercado Stephanie Martineau Richard L. Sax Bruce N. Bole A. John Murphy Jr. N. Munro Merrick Brian T. Seltzer Alan H. Charmatz Michael D. Padilla John W. Merritt Athena Shudde Steven M. Cohn Steven J. Parsons Ellen R. Michaels Daniel C. Smith Gordon E. Dunfee Gary W. Powell John K. Mirau Nancy L. Smoke Merlin L. Eelkema Susan L. Rapp Laurel A. Olson Gerard Smolin Jr. Victor J. Ferrette James M. Riehl Gary L. Paden Garrett H. Suemori Paul C. Guzik David S. Rowley Dana W. Phillips William Szczepaniak James M. Hall Robert G. Russell Jr. Jose H. Razo Chester A. Teklinski Mark A. Hiller Thomas W. Rutledge James J. Rees Joseph A. Vinatieri Steven M. Israel William E. Reising

58 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE William G. Kelley Marla McMeans CLASS OF 1982 Nancy N. Kennerly James J. McMullen Jr. Keith D. Allred Debra B. Koehler William H. Nieman Robert O. Amador Edward H. Kubo Jr. Linda B. Oliver Bruce W. Baker Eugene L. Kusion Mark D. Parker Alan H. Barbanel Peggy A. Leen Steven J. Rosenthal Debra S. Barbanel Thomas L. Ludington Kevin T. Ryan Elena M. Barrett Paul B. Martins Sandra D. Sickler Janice Bellucci Dunn Sandra L. McMahan Irwin Randall L. Skeen Harvey C. Berger Virginia C. Nelson David L. Skelton Timothy R. Binder David A. Niddrie Mark K. Thomas Mark A. Davis Nathan C. Northup John T. Thornton Peter C. Deddeh Adrienne A. Orﬁeld Richard R. Waite Craig D. Dingwall Terry R. Owens Gregory S. Walden Thomas G. Dunnwald John T. Palazzo Jeffrey S. Wruble Robert J. Eatinger Jr. Lori Partrick Ana L. Espana Tina M. Pivonka CLASS OF 1981 Ivan C. Evilsizer Robert T. Rosen Craig B. Barkacs Sergio Feria Jay B. Sacks Peter J. Barrett Julia A. Gaudio Vitting James E. Spain IV Stuart Berkley Don W. Gilbert Jerry D. Spencer Richard DiNapoli Susan B. Hall Williams Susan I. Swander Donal B. Donnelly Paul G. Hanson III Cynthia M. Tausch Carucci Anthony W. Forray Karen J. Hartley Marcy Toscher Lilia E. Garcia William H. Hoover Steven R. Toscher Michael S. Goergen Lawrence E. Ivey Penelope W. Tose Raquel M. Gonzalez Michael J. Kissane Robert J. Trentacosta Ricardo M. Gonzalez William D. Lehman Maureen F. Hallahan S. Deborah Lim CLASS OF 1980 Frances L. Harrison John B. Martin Lori Abbott Moreland Roger L. Heaton William P. Matz Andrew P. Banks Margaret D. Herman Debra K. Maurer Douglas H. Barker Robert J. Kaplan Edwin F. McPherson Bradley A. Bartlett Steven L. Klug Mark E. Milett Ardwin E. Boyer Jr. Frederick A. Knorr III Victor M. Nunez Robert P. Cheney Jr. Peter Legakis Russell O. Parkman Norman M. Cooley Kam W. Li Susan C. Roney Louie V. Delorie Jr. James A. Mangione Reginald M. Sealey Linda B. Dubroof Janice F. Mulligan Theresa Smith Rude Gene F. Erbin Belinda K. Orem Mark K. Stender Donna L. Freeman Judy M. Patno Gretchen W. Thomas Ruth A. Gilbert Charles E. Purdy Jeffrey T. Thomas Peter O. Glaessner Craig A. Ramseyer Mark N. Uhlfelder Michael Goldstein Kenneth G. Roberts Alexandra S. Ward Jose R. Guerrero Paul F. Schimley Michael T. Williams John Peter Gyben George A. Silva Benjamin A. Haddad Eddie Still CLASS OF 1983 Louis R. Hanoian Henry W. Tubbs III Terry J. Adamson Kevin J. Hoffman Luis R. Vargas Michael A. Alfred Kris H. Ikejiri Laurie A. Vetere Thomas M. Apke Alan N. Kreida Kathy P. Waring Margaret T. Armstrong Lynne R. Lasry Alex P. Wilczynski Maureen J. Arrigo Harmon B. Levine Lester F. Wilkinson Jr. Richard A. Bayer Michael D. Liuzzi Karen L. Wullich Georgine F. Brave Michael D. Breslauer

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 59 honor roll

Norman M. Cooley Elizabeth W. Walker CLASS OF 1986 Julianne B. D’Angelo Fellmeth Glenn H. Wechsler Meredith G. Alcock Dianna M. Davis Kemi L. Williams Lisa C. Alexander Susan I. Etezadi Randall L. Winet Elizabeth A. Banham Daniel F. Fears Peter A. Woolley David Z. Bark David H. Forstadt Thomas J. Yocis Steven J. Carroll Russell M. Jauregui Kathryn E. Yost Anderson Eve M. Coddon Steven L. Klug Mark B. Connely Scott M. Koppel CLASS OF 1985 Matthew R. Desmond Kathryn E. Krug Gail Atkinson Richard J. Doren Douglas D. Law Peter J. Attarian Jr. Dennis J. Doucette Michael D. Liuzzi Patricia K. Atwill Patrick J. Duffy III Sharon A. Marshall Kyle M. Becchetti Diane H. Gibson John B. Myer Ann G. Behar Melodie K. Grace William J. Phippard W. Patrick Bengtsson David N. Guedry Michael J. Rider Susan M. Bernhardi Terry J. Hellenkamp Hallen D. Rosner John Boyce Jr. S. Alva Jahnes-Smith Steven L. Sanders Nancy W. Brown Vance R. Jahnes-Smith Richard R. Schwabe Guylyn R. Cummins Deborah J. Jameson Michael E. Shames Marilyn Devin Robert L. Johnson Stephanie Sontag Thomas W. Dominick Thomas T. Kawakami Pamela J. Spain Jacqueline G. Emanuel Kimberly M. Koro Catherine A. Stephenson Louis F. Filosa II Daral B. Mazzarella Paul F. Uhlir Stanley S. Frankfurt Steven W. McDonald Ellen L. Van Hoften David P. Greenberg Jacqueline P. McManus William J. Harris Bruce M. O’Brien CLASS OF 1984 Jeffrey A. Hatﬁeld Raymond Pepper Martha Bywater Thomas C. Howard Phillip L. Poirier Jr. Richard A. Carpenter Ralph B. Kalfayan John L. Ross Ann B. Chase Garrison Klueck Elizabeth L. Schrader Steven J. Cologne Erin L. Kruse Michael A. Van Horne Terri A. DeMitchell Edward H. Laber John L. Vanderslice Dwight D. Edwards Carol J. Lyshak Robert L. Wallan Joanne E. Evoy Linda T. Maramba Daniel W. Watkins Gregory J. Giotta Bruce E. May Bruce H. Winkelman Elizabeth Hufker Hallett Robert H. McCall Terri M. Wyatt Colette M. Humphrey Timothy J. McGarry Patrick Irvine Elizabeth E. McManus CLASS OF 1987 Andrew B. Kaplan Paul Metsch Alfredo Andere Robert L. Kenny Lisa S. Miller-Roche Peter J. Barrett Keith J. Klein Larry Murnane Michael P. Bishop Barbara E. Kristal Susan B. Murphy David L. Bourgoin Michael J. Long Stevan C. Rich Charles L. Childers Janet M. Madden Charles P. Sandel Sandra Ciallella Margaret E. Mangin David L. Skelton Daniel M. Crowley Diane R. May Gean A. Steinhoff Laurel E. Davis Gabriel Mendham Robb M. Strom Leslie C. Detwiler David P. Pasulka Craig D. Swanson Cleve J. Hatch Deborah J. Rider Henry W. Tom Marc S. Herlands James D. Robinson Andrew D. Weiss Julia M. Hoham Susan A. Ruff Timothy N. Will Karen A. Jantzen William R. Salisbury Sandra G. Young Craig P. Keup Kathleen W. Selvidge Jodi Leazott Doucette Mark N. Uhlfelder Julie A. Leeds

60 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Katherine H. Nakamura Carol I. Burchard Debra L. Reilly Cara D. Hutson Edward G. Operini Judith C. Clark Faye H. Russell Robert Kamangar Kneave Riggall Thomas M. Diachenko Donna L. Silverberg Deborah Katznelson James D. Robinson Vivian N. Doering Jeffrey A. Snyder Patrick W. Martin Steven M. Romanoff Patricia Garcia Barry J. Thompson Elizabeth L. McClutchey Marc L. Sands Richard A. Guido Beatrice D. Tillman Victoria M. McFarland Hill Miguel A. Smith Susan L. Horner Susan Westover-Giali Sarah L. Overton Mark K. Stender Jean A. Hubert Karen D. Wood David M. Rosenthal Candace M. Stone Laura L. Jackson Ann M. Zimmermann Carlos C. Ruan Gregory S. Tavill Robert M. Juskie Jilien J. Rubin Christopher Yuhl Gerald J. Karczewski CLASS OF 1991 Elizabeth A. Ryner Susan K. Mazza Kris T. Ballard Phillip C. Samouris CLASS OF 1988 Kathryn M. Megli Tamara C. Barnett William J. Sexton Jennifer J. Barnes William A. Miller Nancy L. Beattie Franco Simone Lynne M. Carlson Arto J. Nuutinen James J. Brown Jr. Robert D. Strauss John M. Carson Michael J. Partos Patrick E. Connolly John M. Upton Thomas E. Courtney Cary C. Payne K. David Crockett Peter K. Diamond John L. Rogitz Richard L. Ehrman CLASS OF 1993 James K. Dierking Danielle M. Schulte Michael E. Finnie Linda L. Barkacs Tien V. Doan Steven A. Seick Daniel J. Gleason Stacie L. Brandt Richard A. Duvernay Sandra D. Sickler John B. Hammond Samuel D. Brickley II Tamara L. Equals Lorri A. Silverman Charles R. Hawkey III Richard F. Britschgi Ana M. Escobar Philip C. Silverman Benjamin E. Johnson Laurelann Bundens Ann T. Fathy Timothy J. Silverman Mitchell M. Kam Eric Campbell James L. Frederick Marguerite S. Strand Daniel J. Kessler Robert W. Chong Gary F. Garland Karen M. Stuckey Lisa A. Kokenge-Sharpe John E. Dawson Scott M. Hall Susan Tumay Mary A. Lehman Cindy Dobler Davis John B. Hammond Atoosa Vakili William F. Lightner Christopher J. Duenow George E. Hurley Jr. Randall C. Lococo Paula Forbis D. Marc Lyde CLASS OF 1990 Patrick A. Matthews Matthew M. Frank Thomas D. Mauriello Anthony L. Abbatangelo Kathleen J. McKee Kendra J. Hall Sandra K. McBeth John H. Abbott Jon C. Milliken Paula Harrelson Leslie A. McDonell William J. Bianco Byron G. Mousmoules Jacqueline A. Hlavin Catherine L. McKee Vickie L. Bibro Kathryn G. Murray Paul F. Hora George M. Means II Kristen Bruesehoff Dalessio Kristen M. Naidoo Robert W. Huston Jennifer S. Meisner Joel R. Bryant Maria K. Nelson April M. Johnson Holly J. Nolan Kimberly A. Byrens Kevin M. Rapp Michele A. Kiraly David P. Ramirez James J. Dalessio Robert E. Rose William J. LaFond Catherine A. Richardson Dale J. Giali David Paul Ruth Michael D. Lurie Phillip I. Roitman Peter C. Gifﬁn Patrick E. Sparks William E. Malecki Amy J. Romaker Susan M. Gust Carol Anne Spils John F. McGowan Andrew D. Simons Doreen M. Hogle David G. Steward Eric Mills Jean Luc Sinniger Robert P. Huntoon Timothy R. Walsh Sheila R. Mohan William R. Squires Jr. Jude M. Koenig James A. Ward Todd T. Omura Dani L. Stephens Joyce A. Lamb Gay Zide Richard A. Ostrow Todd F. Stevens Jennifer L. Lynch Pamela J. Rand Audrey N. Stubenberg Gregory S. Mason CLASS OF 1992 Daniel Rodriguez Victor M. Torres Damon C. Mosler Leah D. Davis Deborah Shepherd Jeannine Pacioni Nale William A. Eddy Mary A. Smigielski CLASS OF 1989 Mark W. Norman Gary M. Erickson Dean A. Spizzirri William Curtis Barnes Jr. Donald M. Pilger Campbell H. Finlay Donald L. Steerman Ted D. Billbe II Bruce D. Poole Jana Harder Aagaard Kathryn Turner-Arsenault Jeannine B. Botta Guth Laurie S. Poole Edward L. Holly Uzi Zimmerman

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 61 honor roll

CLASS OF 1994 Douglas G. Muehlhauser Robin L. Deems David P. Cramer Mark A. Amador Dena J. Murphy Collette C. Galvez Mallary K. DeMerlier Holly S. Anderson Nancy V. Nieto Alexis S. Gutierrez Matthew G. Guerrero Danilo Ballecer Eugene A. Patrizio Heidi M. Gutierrez Weldon E. Havins Frank A. Bottini John C. Roberts Joseph J. Huprich Suzanne M. Henry Robert A. Cocchia Patrick Q. Sullivan Jennifer Levings Janet F. Kelleran Naomi R. Cohen Maj-le Tate Bridges Ann K. Linnehan Stacy M. Kelly Courtney A. Coyle William H. Trausch Karyn K. Reed Hubert H. Kuo Margaret A. Dalton Allen B. Walburn Dena M. Roudybush Nichole S. Leeson Diane E. de Kervor David Paul Ruth Peter J. Leeson Anna M. Deckert CLASS OF 1996 Katherine Umpleby Veronica Y. Ma Austin Dove Derek K. Aberle Jeffrey A. Unger John Mansour Michel J. Duquella Addison K. Adams Thomas D. Waylett Debra B. Marley Suzanne F. Evans Richard R. Ames Mark R. Weinstein Kevin M. McPhee Geoffrey A. Graves Michael W. Battin Elizabeth A. Mitchell Kenneth D. Heller Ernest L. Bell CLASS OF 1998 Philip S. Pesin Denise M. Hickey Eric J. Benink Sarah E. Akinfosile Scott C. Smerud Catharine Kroger-Diamond T. Hall Brehme IV Elizabeth J. Arleo Tanya K. Streit Steve O. Kuster Kelli D. Brown Daniel V. Biedler II Cynthia L. Valenzuela Gerald Maliszewski Craig P. Cherney Kelley A. Blaine Barry S. Wilson Haida Massoud Mojdehi Michael A. Connor Kristin L. Connor Ted L. Mawla Sean G. Edwards Stephen S. English CLASS OF 2000 Jonathan D. Montag Mary A. Enges Jo Ann Gambale Michael B. Abramson Craig S. Nelson Robin Felix Michael R. Gibson Karla C. Baer D. Lynn Patchell Amy P. Hellenkamp Robert H. Gleason Dess A. Benedetto Robert T. Ramos Timothy R. Howe Weldon E. Havins Jacqueline R. Bevins-Pack Margaret T. Sandke Melissa A. Kirschner-Scarseth Daniel C. Hunter IV Holly M. Brett John D. Shepherd Marilyn T.Lynch Jennifer C. Kurlan Tyree K. Dorward Timothy J. Tatro Steven J. Marietti John S. Kyle Jr. Michael S. Faircloth Shannon N. Taylor Jilana L. Miller Marita M. Lauinger Benjamin Galdston Matt M. Wakeﬁeld William E. O’Nell Andrea K. Lockhart Christine Galdston Emil J. Wohl William J. Pawlak Jeffrey F. Manzi Michelle Grant James M. Wood Molly L. Roth Edson K. McClellan Wendy R. Greenberg-Hahn Annette I. Zillgens Goldman Dawnmarie I. Saunders Alastair N. McLeod Nick Hogan Elizabeth A. Skane Marco B. Mercaldo John A. Jurata Jr. CLASS OF 1995 Gary M. Slavett Ryan A. Murr Keith Kelly John J. Arens Richard Stout Carmela D. Nicholas David M. LaSpaluto David H. Arnold Eric D. Swenson Barry K. Shelton Ravi K. Lumpkin David W. Baumgarten Kelli L. Taylor Catherine T. Smith Matthew M. Mahoney Kelli D. Brown Robert J. Tuider William B. Sparks III Guy McRoskey A.Holland Denton McCloskey Jeffrey A. Warﬁeld Jeffrey P. Sutton Mai M. Petersen Shawn J. Ervin Ian G. Williamson Lauri S. Thompson-Bracken Joseph D. Raskin Lynn D. Field-Karsh Steven M. Zadravecz Karen L. VanderMeer Michael F. Ruiz Russell A. Gold Arturo Zepeda Kristina L. Velarde Gretchen Shipley Melissa M. Hensley Charles B. Witham Patrick J. Shipley Steven C. Honse CLASS OF 1997 William W. Witt Keith L. Shoji Robin P. Kandell Mark B. Aldrich Adrian R. Wolff Kelly Smith Shannon A. Kelley Susan J. Barricella Perry H. Sobel Richard Kim Tiffany E. Bohman CLASS OF 1999 Michelle N. Surfas Christine M. Laumakis Christopher H. Clamon Stephen R. Barber Sam K. Tahmassebi Heidi A. Leider Christopher A. Cooley Amanda F. Doerrer William L. VanderMeer Andrew R. McCloskey Patrick W. Daniels Justin C. Buller Elizabeth P. Weinstein Steven R. Mitchell A. Joseph Chandler Blair W. Will

62 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE CLASS OF 2001 David W. Brennan Faculty and Staff Professor Richard C. Pugh Anonymous Emily F. Burns M. Susan Quinn ’77 Margaret H. Adams Megan E. Callan Professor Cynthia Aaron Professor Lisa P. Ramsey R. Kent Bailey Jocelyn R. Castillo Professor Laura S. Adams Professor Michael D. Ramsey Jeffrey P. Carvalho Jessica K. Cook Professor Larry Alexander Stephanie Reighley Gwendolyn K. Christeson Jeannette Filippone Professor Carl A. Auerbach Dean Daniel B. Rodriguez Clark L. Davidson Christine Galdston Peter Aylward The Honorable H. Lee Sarokin Erin Ferguson Erin P. Gibson Professors Linda L. ’93 and Professor Maimon Schwarzschild Collette C. Galvez Joseph W. Goodnight Craig B. Barkacs ’81 Professor Virginia V. Shue ’72 Leigh A. Hatﬁeld Rose M. Huelskamp Susan S. Benson Professor Thomas Smith Carl J. Henkel Rajiv J. Jain Professor Laura M. Berend ’75 Professor Allen Snyder Sharon Hodges Nathan G. Leedy Professor Roy L. Brooks Professor Lester B. Snyder Raymond B. Hom Erik M. Liggins Professor Karen C. Burke Professor Edmund Ursin Amy L. Hunsberger Emily R. Murphy Professor Richard A. Professor Jorge A. Vargas Lynnae Lee James C. Pennington Carpenter ’84 Elisa Weichel Ryan B. Luther Richard J. Radcliffe Professor Nancy Carol Carter Professor Richard J. Wharton ’73 David H. Melilli Stephanie L. Rahlfs Professor Laurence Claus Professor Charles Wiggins Matthew Morache John G. Rickenbrode Janet Courtney-Smith Professor Mary Jo Wiggins Joshua Pearson Jennifer A. Savage Julianne D’Angelo Fellmeth ’83 Kemi Williams Kimberly A. Rible Adam J. Susz Professor Lynne Dallas Carrie R. Wilson ’77 Christina M. Riehl Adam A. Welland Professor Margaret A. Dalton ’94 Professor Christopher Wonnell Jonathan Steer Amy M. Wood Professor Michael R. Devitt Professor Fred C Zacharias Carl J. Eging Professor Robert Fellmeth CLASS OF 2002 CLASS OF 2004 Corporations, Lauren G. Belger Cirrus A. Alpert Professor C. Hugh Friedman James R. Bostwick Jr. Robert M. Augst Elizabeth M. Givens Foundations and Watson G. Branch Lori S. Batra Professor Allen M. Gruber Law Firms Abbey Gurney Brett A. Broge Jack R. Dailey American Board of Professor Robert J. Hanna ’75 Glenn E. Buberl Sierra J. Damm Trial Advocates Professor J. Steven Hartwell Heather L. Callahan Carrie S. Dolton Anonymous Trevin Hartwell Amy M. Darby Doug P. Flaherty Antedricks Inc. Professor Walter Heiser Matthew Johnson Paige Hazard Anzalone & Associates, Inc. Professor Jane L. Henning Matthew Johnson Scott Lafranchi Aventis Pasteur Foundation Professor Gail Heriot Linda E. Keck-Quiroz Dana P. Larkin Bailey Family Foundation, Inc. Professor Paul Horton Andrew I. Kimmel Erin D. McCartney Bank of America Julie Hoyle Kevin M. Kirby Alicia I. Mead Barry Family Foundation The Honorable Richard Huffman Alexandra M. Kwoka Van N. Nguy Bartlett & Lievers Professor Michael B. Kelly Daniel J. Lickel Camille A. Perna The C.E. and S. Foundation Professor Adam Kolber Jason Lindsay Camille A. Perna The Casner Family Foundation Professor Herbert I. Lazerow Guy McRoskey Nathan D. Thomas The Clorox Company Professor Janet Madden Marjorie M. Musgrave Suzanne Warren Skov Foundation Debra B. Marley ’99 Katherine L. Parker ConAgra Foods Foundation, Inc. Toni Martinson Erinn R. Putzi Loveland CLASS OF 2005 The Condor Group The Honorable Robert E. Kathy Roth Douquet Ben Ammerman Consumer First Inc. May ’70 Soﬁa L. Sarabia Mathieu G. Blackston James S. Copley Foundation Professor John H. Minan Jacqueline M. Skay Shelley Blair Dostart Clapp Gordon & Professor Jean Montoya Jan S. Wendler Sylvia Cediel Coveney, LLP Professor Grant H. Morris Amy E. Zelaya Aubree L. Cherney DS Consulting Professor Virginia Nolan Matthew DeCarolis Duane Morris Teresa O’Rourke CLASS OF 2003 Mercede A. Goates Fullerton, Lemann, Schaefer & Professor Leslie Oster Michael B. Abramson Charlotte L. Hasse Dominick Professor Richard A. Paul Russell T. Boggs Aukse S. Rimas Gelfand and Gelfand Professor Theresa Player Susan M. Brake Ginsburg & Associates

ADVOCATE USD LAW / 23:1 ❖ 63 honor roll

Great Western Mortgage Center for Public Adrienne Hirt and Jeffrey Thomas A. Smith Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP C. Rodman The Leon Strauss Foundation Incorvaia & Associates Interest Law Theodore P. Hurwitz Brooke J. and Richard E. Toscano Jewish Community Foundation and Children’s Robert Isman Professor Edmund Ursin John Bucher Real Estate Co., Inc. Dorothy N. and Allan K. Jonas Nancy L. Vaughan Keeney, Waite & Stevens, APC Advocacy Institute Professor Yale Kamisar Carrie R. ’77 and Wayne H. The Keto Law Ofﬁces Anonymous The Honorable Leon S. Kaplan Wilson Jr. Linden Root Dickinson Anonymous Katz-Lapides Family Fund Professor Fred C Zacharias Foundation Anonymous Kathryn E. Krug ’83 Livingston Mix, LLP Anonymous Lynne Lasry ’80 and Professor Anonymous Lockhart & Britton Allen Snyder he following companies Lorman Education Services Anonymous Randi and Douglas D. Law ’83 T Louise & Herbert Horvitz Vickie Lynn Bibro ’90 and John Jane G. and Professor and organizations provided H. Abbott ’90 Charitable Directed Fund Herbert I. Lazerow contributions matching Miller, Monson, Peshel, Polacek Elaine and Professor Larry Joanne Higgins Leslie ’76 and & Hoshaw Alexander John W. Leslie those of individual donors Mildred and Victor Allstead MTT Partners Jenna H. Leyton over the 2004–2005 Parker, Heits & Crosgrove, PLLC Anzalone & Associates, Inc. Michael D. Liuzzi ’80 ’83 Paul Plevin Sullivan Maureen J. Arrigo ’83 and Marcia A. and M. James Lorenz ﬁscal year. Connaughton Paul Ward Louise & Herbert Horvitz Peterson Charitable Foundation Steve Barrow Charitable Fund Matching Pillsbury Winthrop LLP Lucinda H. and Robert Professor Janet and Jim Madden Contributions Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & M. Brashares John C. Malugen Aventis Pasteur Foundation Savitch LLP Paula A. Braveman Gayle and James B. McKenna Biogen Idec, Inc. San Diego County Penny and Professor Roy Barbara S. and Edwin L. Miller Jr. Caterpillar Foundation District Attorney L. Brooks Margo and Professor John ChevronTexaco San Diego Foundation Dana Bunnett H. Minan Dominion Foundation Science Applications Candace M. Carroll and Professor Virginia Nolan General RE Corporation International Corporation Leonard B. Simon Peterson Charitable Foundation H.J. Heinz Company Foundation Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek Professor Nancy Carol Carter Barbara J. and Paul A. Peterson Ingram Micro Inc. Silldorf, Shinnick & Ryan LLP Professor Laurence Claus Cynthia L. Simpson and Intel Foundation Solomon Ward Seidenwurm Consumers First, Inc./Jim Conran David Pugh The Morrison & Foerster & Smith ConAgra Foods Foundation, Inc. Nan and Professor Richard Foundation Sony Electronics Inc. Sandra Cox and David L. Cox C. Pugh PricewaterhouseCoopers The Leon Strauss Foundation Ursula G. and Professor Renae Fish and Gary QUALCOMM Incorporated Strom & Associates Joseph J. Darby Redenbacher Sprint Foundation Tatro & Zamoyski LLP Steven B. Davis Stephanie and Reggie Reighley State Farm Companies The National Task Force Norene Debruycker Donald G. Rez Foundation for Children’s Peter C. Deddeh ’82 Gary A. Richwald SuperValu Constitutional Rights Ellen E. Hunter and Richard Kenneth G. Roberts ’81 The Boeing Company United Way of Orange County P. Edwards Ron Russo Wachovia Vanguard Charitable Nancy and Brian Fellmeth Georgia and Blair L. Sadler Washington Mutual Endowment Program Julie and David H. Forstadt ’83 Gloria P. Samson Wells Fargo Foundation Victor & Ethel McQuistion Anne Elizabeth Fragasso Marjorie and The Honorable Scholarship Trust The Honorable Charles D. Gill H. Lee Sarokin Wingert Grebing Brubaker Elizabeth M. Givens Deborah ’93 and John D. ’94 & Goodwin Constance and David Goldin Shepherd Women’s Law Caucus, USD Beverly and Roger Haines Jr. Darlene and Donald Shiley School of Law Birt Harvey Harriet and Alan Schumacher Judy and Edgar H. Hayden Jr. ’70 Sieroty Family Fund The Honorable William Silldorf, Shinnick & Ryan LLP O. Hayes Reatha and Owen Smith

64 ❖ 23:1 / USD LAW ADVOCATE Visit www.law.sandiego.edu/about/news/calen- NOVEMBER 16, 2006 dars/event/ for more information and updates. Distinguished Alumni Award Luncheon Contact the Office of Development AUGUST 28-31, 2006 and Alumni Relations U.S. Justice Antonin Scalia Visits as (619) 260-4692 Distinguished Jurist-in-Residence Contact the Dean’s Office DECEMBER 2006 (619) 260-4527 Bar Swearing-In Ceremony and Breakfast Contact the Office of Development AUGUST 30, 2006 and Alumni Relations Lecture on Originalism and Constitutional (619) 260-4692 Interpretation by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia DECEMBER 5, 2006 Contact the Dean’s Office Law Alumni Board Meeting (619) 260-4527 Contact the Office of Development and Alumni Relations SEPTEMBER AND OCTOBER 2006 (619) 260-4692 Fall Recruiting Contact School of Law Career Services LATE 2006 / EARLY 2007 to participate Linda Chavez, Chairman of the (619) 260-4529 Center for Equal Opportunity Joan E. Bowes-James Madison on the docket SEPTEMBER 7, 2006 Distinguished Speaker Series Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi Contact the Dean’s Office Joan B. Kroc Distinguished Lecture Series (619) 260-4527 and USD School of Law Jane Ellen Bergman Memorial Lecture Series JANUARY 4, 2007 Contact the Dean’s Office Washington, D.C., Alumni Reception (619) 260-4527 Contact the Office of Development and Alumni Relations SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 (619) 260-4692 Law Alumni Board Meeting Contact the Office of Development FEBRUARY 2007 and Alumni Relations Careers in the Law: Student/Alumni (619) 260-4692 Networking Fair Contact the Office of Development SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 and Alumni Relations Board of Visitors Fall Meeting (619) 260-4692 or the Contact the Office of Development School of Law Career Services Office and Alumni Relations (619) 260-4529 (619) 260-4692 FEBRUARY 2007 OCTOBER 3, 2006 Mock Interview Program Red Mass Contact the School of Law Career Services Contact the Dean’s Office Office to participate (619) 260-4527 (619) 260-4529

OCTOBER 6-8, 2006 FEBRUARY AND MARCH 2007 Law Alumni Weekend Spring Recruiting Contact the Ofﬁce of Development Contact the School of Law Career Services and Alumni Relations Ofﬁce to participate (619) 260-4692 (619) 260-4529 parting shot

Thirty-ﬁve years ago USD law students appear in court to represent their client with Professor Lynch as their supervising attorney. This year, the University of San Diego Legal Clinics celebrate 35 years of training students and serving the community. Recognized as one of the most extensive and successful in the nation, the Legal Clinics currently support 200 students and close 500 cases a year. The list of clinics includes Civil, Criminal, Entrepreneurship, Environmental, Immigration, Land Use, Mental Health, Perspectives in Criminal Justice, Small Claims, Special Education and Tax.

N ON-PROFIT

U.S. POSTAGE

S CHOOL OF L AW PAID 5998 ALCALÁ PARK S AN D IEGO, CA S AN D IEGO, CA 92110-2492 P ERMIT N O . 365

A DDRESS S ERVICE R EQUESTED