Starting-Today.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Starting-Today.Pdf Starting today The future of mental health services Final Inquiry report September 2013 Acknowledgements We wish to thank all those who took part in our Inquiry for their support and contributions, and especially the members of our Advisory Panel. We record their names in the Annex to this report. We thank Sam Blausten, Hannah Bullmore, Joanna Carson, Caroline Davis, Alice Inch and Simon Lawton-Smith at the Mental Health Foundation for their help in delivering this report. We acknowledge with thanks the financial contribution to this Inquiry received from the Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College, London and Lilly UK. Contents Forward 1 Summary 2 Background and Terms of Reference 7 Methodology 10 Visions of the future 11 The world in 1983 14 Assumptions about the future, and past and present trends 15 The Call for Evidence: what we were told 19 The six key themes 23 Theme 1 – Personalising services 23 Co-production 24 Self-management 26 Theme 2 – Integrated care 27 Models of integrated care 29 Specialist mental health care in primary care settings 29 Crisis support in the community 31 ‘One stop shops’ and community support 32 Taking integrated care forward 33 Changing the mindset, and the importance of relationships 33 Structural factors that facilitate good integrated care 35 Information-sharing systems 35 Shared protocols 35 Joint funding and commissioning 35 Co-located services 36 Multidiscinplinary teams 36 Liaison services 36 Theme 3 – Lifespan issues 37 Early life 37 Later life 38 Theme 4 – Workforce development 40 The balance between generalist and specialist 40 A potential role for peer support workers and navigators 42 Peer support workers 42 Navigators 43 Theme 5 – Research and new technologies 45 Research 45 Clinical research 46 Research into social interventions 46 Sharing information and patient data 47 Technical compatibility 47 Confidentiality 48 Using new technology 49 Theme 6 – Public mental health 50 The public health workforce and mental health 52 Addressing stigma and discrimination 52 Stigma from the public 52 Stigma from professionals 53 Annex: Participants in the Inquiry 55 References 57 Quotations used in this report Throughout this report we quote from witnesses who attended oral evidence sessions, members of our Policy Panel (some 500 people who include mental health service users, carers and mental health professionals) and respondents to our Call for Evidence. In the latter case, responses are referenced by the number of the question asked (1-6), followed by the number of the respondent (1-1533). Hence, for example, 3.602 is the 602nd response we received to question 3. Foreword Mental health is an integral part of an However there are certain trends which are individual’s well-being. It means different not very clear. For example, rates of migration things to different people, as does mental and speed of globalisation and urbanisation illness. There is considerable evidence to will affect psychiatric vulnerability but we indicate that the health and economic burden cannot predict by how much and how these related to poor mental health in the UK is needs can be met. The impact of the current significant - greater than cardiovascular economic downturn will be felt for a long time diseases and cancer - and yet the emphasis and it is highly unlikely that health and social on mental wellbeing is often very limited. services will ever get the same amounts of generous funding that we have had in the UK Reasons for this relative neglect are many, in the past two decades. Hence we need to but include a perception that mental ill-health look at fresh ways of developing and delivering is somehow self-inflicted, with an external services. locus of control such as an inability to deal with pressures, and discrimination as well What is clear from our Inquiry is that we need in poor recognition of the scientific basis of to start taking action today to address all the psychiatry. Fortunately in the past few years factors we are aware of that challenge good this has started to change with policymakers mental health, and lead to mental illness. We becoming more aware of the implications cannot expect mental health services simply of untreated mental illness. The current to muddle along with no clear sense of what economic downturn around the globe has is required, and sleepwalk into the future. If also led to mental illness, emotional distress we do so, we will be failing both today’s and and resulting physical distress being better tomorrow’s generation of people who will recognised and addressed than before. need mental health services, and their carers and families, as well as the staff who work in There is widespread agreement, though, that mental health services. This is not just about more needs to be done, and that the future is more effective care provided by specialist very uncertain. Accordingly, in 2012 the Mental mental health services. It is also about the Health Foundation, as a leading charitable role of primary care mental health and the crucial organisation dealing with both public mental public mental health agenda. We hope that this health and mental health care, decided to set Inquiry will be a major step in this direction. up an Inquiry to look at the future of mental health services in the UK over the next 20 to To support our Inquiry, we have been 30 years. extremely fortunate in getting a large number of very busy people together who have given We were delighted to chair the Inquiry Advisory up a considerable amount of their time and Panel. The future is always difficult to predict energy to this task and we are grateful for and we recognised the danger in trying to do that. Staff within the Foundation have worked so. However one thing that we can be certain of incredibly hard to deliver the report. We would is that the future will happen, and the present like to thank in particular Andrew McCulloch will affect the future. We know that people are for his support and Simon Lawton-Smith going to be living longer and therefore likely and Hannah Bullmore for their hard work and to experience a greater number of illnesses, energy. While acknowledging the seriousness whether physical or mental – or, as is likely, both. of the issue, Foundation staff have also made We have good predictions of the numbers of it enjoyable for us to work on this project - older individuals in 20-30 years’ time, and we are many thanks. also able to make reasonable assumptions about prevalence rates of mental disorder across all age Dinesh Bhugra groups and the incidence of disorders in vulnerable groups. Alex Carlile 1 Summary We spend more across the UK iii. To consider how to make mental health on mental health services than services fit for purpose to deal with on any other area of health, challenges 20-30 years in the future. including cancer and heart It is estimated there will be nearly 8 million disease. The economic impact of more adults in the UK by 2030. If prevalence rates for mental disorders stay the same (at poor mental health is estimated around one in four), that is some 2 million to be over £100 billion to the more adults with mental health problems than economy each year in England today. It is also estimated that there will be one million more children and young people in alone. Yet despite this, we know the UK by 2030. Again, if prevalence rates for that the care and treatment that mental disorders stay the same (at around one we offer people with mental in ten), that is some 100,000 more children and young people with mental health problems health problems is variable - than today. many people with mental health problems have trouble accessing It goes without saying that future mental health services need adequate funding to services; interventions are not ensure appropriate levels of services and always effective; services can skilled staff. We have not, however, specified any amount or proportion of funding that be poor at providing a holistic should be spent on mental health services, nor response to people’s needs, for from where the funding might come. These instance neglecting people’s are decisions that will need to be taken by politicians of the future, and they do not affect physical health; and many simply our key messages about what mental health get no help at all (some do not services need to do today to start moving seek it, or give up trying due to towards effective mental health care in 20-30 years’ time. difficulties accessing help). Nor do we attempt to resolve all of society’s At the same time, there are many challenges ills, such as inequality, debt, unemployment facing mental health services as we look to and homelessness, which underpin much the future, including persistently high levels poor mental health and mental illness across of psychiatric morbidity, increasing levels of the UK, though these issues were regularly comorbidity and multiple morbidity, an ageing raised in evidence put to the Inquiry. Our population with high health and social care focus is mental health services of the future. needs, barriers to providing good integrated In considering public mental health issues we care and severe constraints on public do touch on the pressing need for a greater spending. emphasis on the prevention of mental illness, to ease future pressures on services, but a It is against this background that in 2012 fuller discussion of this falls outside the remit the Mental Health Foundation established of this Inquiry. its Inquiry into the Future of Mental Health Services (FOMHS), with the following aims: We need fresh ways of working in mental health.
Recommended publications
  • The Mental Health Act 1983 (The Act)
    Acknowledgement ‘The artwork on the front cover is ‘Missed’ by Chris Ridge, the overall winner of our competition for artwork for the Code of Practice. ‘Missed’ illustrates the benefits of art therapy for people with mental health problems.’ 1 Introduction i. The Code of Practice and this Reference Guide should be used together to provide statutory guidance (the Code of Practice) and an explanation of the provisions of the Mental Health Act 1983 (the Act). ii. There are a small number of clarifications to the Code of Practice and these are listed in Figure 1 at the end of this Introduction. Presentation and content iii. The Reference Guide is divided into 38 chapters with five annexes. Chapters have been grouped into eight clusters relating to common themes and topics. Colour coding has been used so these groups can be recognised. Comprehensive cross-referencing and annexes have been included to ensure that users can readily find related material. The eight clusters reflect the sections of the Code of Practice. The groupings are summarised below. Using the Act: chapter 1 The chapter in this section describes the structure of the Act and provides basic definitions for the terms used in the Act. Protecting patients’ rights and autonomy: chapters 2-6 This group of chapters addresses the issues of particular importance for empowering patients, carers, nearest relatives and others with a legitimate interest in matters relating to care and treatment under the Act. It provides guidance on the nearest relatives including the identification and appointment of an acting nearest relative by the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Britain Fairer? Contents
    — The state of equality and human rights 2018 — The state of equality and human rights 2018 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 12 of the Equality Act 2006 as amended by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 June 2019 Equality and Human Rights Commission 2019 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Equality and Human Rights Commission copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents ISBN 978-1-5286-1280-7 CCS0419112082 06/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office Is Britain Fairer? Contents Contents Foreword 4 4 Living standards 59 4.1 Introduction 61 Executive summary 6 4.2 Key policy and legal developments 61 1 Introduction 12 4.3 Housing 69 1.1 How we reviewed the evidence 13 4.4 Poverty 74 1.2 Context 14 4.5 Social care 80 1.3 Next steps 15 4.6 Conclusion 87 2 Education 16 5 Health 88 2.1 Introduction 18 5.1 Introduction 91 2.2 Key policy and legal developments 18 5.2 Key policy and legal developments
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Adult Social Care
    Research, Policy and Planning (2016/17) 32(3), 169-182 Role theory and family values – a conceptual framework for family and social work reciprocation Joan Rapaport1 and Geraldine Poirier Baiani2 1 Visiting Research Fellow, Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London 2 Former Assistant Deputy Minister in New Brunswick, Canada __________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Normalization and Social Role Valorization have been extensively associated with the closures of long-stay hospitals for people with mental health problems and with learning disabilities. The related theory of Reciprocal Role Valorization emerged from within a study of the nearest relative, a patient safeguard under the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales. It illustrated the potential for reciprocation provided by the nearest relative powers and related Approved Social Worker duties, to achieve mutually agreed objectives for patient welfare. The theory is conceivably transferable to other case scenarios. The Family Group Conference helps families to find solutions to their respective problems and promotes family and social work collaboration. This framework of interaction suggests Reciprocal Role Valorization may be implicitly at work at the heart of the conference process. The theory’s relevance to the Family Group Conference, in particular the model developed by the Canadian Province of New Brunswick, is here examined. The importance of specialist post- qualifying professional development and professional maturity to enable social workers to unlock family potential is also argued in the context of increasing interest in strengths based social work. Keywords: Reciprocal Role Valorization, nearest relative, Family Group Conference, social worker, strengths based approaches Terms used In this article the term ‘service user’ is preferred to that of patient and used to describe an individual who receives mental health services.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Differences in Cancer Survival
    J7ournal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1991; 45: 216-219 J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.45.3.216 on 1 September 1991. Downloaded from Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival M Kogevinas, M G Marmot, A J Fox, P 0 Goldblatt Abstract Two decades later, interest in survival patterns Study objective-The aim was to was renewed when large differences among ethnic investigate the relationship between groups in the USA became evident, possibly due socioeconomic status and cancer survival. to differences in the timing of cancer detection.2 Design-This was a prospective study, To obtain nationally representative figures, we linking census and vital registration records examined cancer survival for the period 1971- for an approximate 1% representative 1983 in England and Wales, in the OPCS sample ofthose enumerated in England and Longitudinal Study, a 1%/' sample of people Wales in the 1971 census. identified in the 1971 census. Setting-The study population is nationwide. Participants-The study sample consists Methods of 250 588 men and 262 484 women. During The OPCS Longitudinal Study is a cohort study 1971-81, 17 844 cases of cancer were of an approximately 1 % representative sample of registered, and of those registered, 13 532 those enumerated in England and Wales in the died during 1971-1983. 1971 census and it links census and vital Measurements and main results- registration records.>5 The present analysis is Socioeconomic status was assessed in terms based on death records incorporated from the of housing tenure. Council tenants, the low National Health Service central register, socioeconomic group, had poorer survival population characteristics from the 1971 census, than owner occupiers, the high socio- and cancer incidence from the National Cancer economic group, for the combined group of Registration Scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Bulletin
    Statistical Bulletin Childbearing for Women Born in Different Years, England and Wales, 2013 Coverage: England and Wales Date: 04 December 2014 Geographical Area: Country Theme: Population Key points • The average completed family size for women born in 1968, and reaching age 45 in 2013, was 1.92 children per woman. This compares with their mothers’ generation, represented by women born in 1941, who had on average 2.34 children. • Two children was the most common family size for women born in both 1941 and 1968. • The level of childlessness among women born in 1968 (18%) is higher than for women born in 1941 (11%). One in ten women born in 1968 had four or more children, compared with nearly one in five women born in 1941. • Women born in 1983 – the most recent cohort to reach age 30 - have had slightly fewer children on average (1.02) by their 30th birthday than women born in 1968 who had 1.15 children by the same age. Introduction This release previously called ‘Cohort Fertility’ has been renamed as “Childbearing for women born in different years” and presents statistics on childbearing among women in England and Wales. These figures are presented by the year of birth of mother – for groups of women born in the same year - rather than by the year of birth of child. The estimates have been updated with 2013 births, the latest data available, which means that completed family size for women born in 1968 (women reaching age 45 in 2013) is presented for the first time. Although the release is now called “Childbearing for women born in different years” we shall be using the word “cohort” at places within the text for simplicity.
    [Show full text]