DOCSLIB.ORG

Case 2:18-Cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 1 of 39 Page ID #:6038

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case 2:18-Cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 1 of 39 Page ID #:6038 Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 1 of 39 Page ID #:6038 1 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 2 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 3 Seattle, WA 98101 (206) 623-7292 4 [email protected] 5 Annika K. Martin (pro hac vice) LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 6 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 7 (212) 355-9500 [email protected] 8 Daniel C. Girard (SBN 114826) 9 GIRARD SHARP LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400 10 San Francisco, CA 94108 (415) 981-4800 11 [email protected] 12 Class Counsel and Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee 13 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 WESTERN DIVISION 17 IN RE: USC STUDENT HEALTH No. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW 18 CENTER LITIGATION [Consolidated with: 19 No. 2:18-cv-04940- SVW-GJS, No. 2:18-cv-05010-SVW-GJS, 20 No. 2:18-cv-05125-SVW-GJS, and No. 2:18-cv-06115-SVW-GJS] 21 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF 22 MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND 23 EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS; MEMORANDUM OF 24 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT 25 26 Date: June 7, 2021 Time: 1:30 p.m. 27 Hon. Stephen V. Wilson 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:6039 1 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION 2 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 7, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., or as soon 4 thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Honorable Stephen V. Wilson in 5 Courtroom 10A of the above-entitled court, located at 350 West First Street, Los 6 Angeles, California 90012, Plaintiffs in these consolidated actions will and hereby do 7 move the Court, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an 8 Order: (1) awarding Class Counsel attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses in 9 the amount of $25 million: $24,243,762 in attorneys’ fees and $756,238 in 10 unreimbursed expenses; and (2) awarding service awards of $15,000 to 46 Plaintiffs 11 and of $20,000 to four Plaintiffs. 12 This motion is based on the incorporated memorandum of law; the declarations 13 submitted herewith; the pleadings and papers on file in this action; any further papers 14 filed in support of this motion; and any additional arguments of counsel. Pursuant to 15 Civil Local Rule 7-3, counsel for Plaintiffs conferred with counsel for Defendant USC 16 prior to filing this Motion, and USC does not oppose the relief sought. 17 18 DATED: April 9, 2021 Respectfully submitted, 19 By /s/ Daniel C. Girard 20 Daniel C. Girard 21 Jordan Elias 22 GIRARD SHARP LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400 23 San Francisco, CA 94108 24 Tel.: (415) 981-4800 Fax: (415) 981-4846 25 Email: [email protected] 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 3 of 39 Page ID #:6040 1 Steve W. Berman Shelby R. Smith 2 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 3 1301 Second Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101 4 Tel.: 206-623-7292 5 Fax: 206-623-0594 Email: [email protected] 6 Email: [email protected] 7 Whitney K. Siehl 8 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL 9 SHAPIRO LLP 10 455 N. Cityfront Plaza Dr., Suite 2410 Chicago, IL 60611 11 Tel.: 708-628-4949 12 Fax: 708-628-4950 Email: [email protected] 13 14 Christopher R. Pitoun HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL 15 SHAPIRO LLP 16 301 N. Lake Ave, Suite 920 Pasadena, CA 91101 17 Tel.: (213) 330-7150 18 Fax: (213) 330-7152 Email: [email protected] 19 20 Jonathan D. Selbin Annika K. Martin 21 Evan J. Ballan 22 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP 23 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor 24 San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Tel.: (415) 956-1000 25 Fax: (415) 956-1008 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 4 of 39 Page ID #:6041 1 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Class Counsel and Plaintiffs’ Executive 4 Committee 5 Joseph G. Sauder 6 SAUDER SCHELKOPF LLC 7 1109 Lancaster Avenue Berwyn, PA 19312 8 Tel: (610) 200-0580 9 Fax: (610)727-4360 10 Email: [email protected] 11 Jonathan Shub SHUB LAW FIRM LLC 12 134 Kings Highway East 13 2nd Floor Haddonfield, NJ 08033 14 Tel: 856.772.7200 15 Email: [email protected] 16 Additional Class Counsel 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 5 of 39 Page ID #:6042 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 4 5 II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND .......................................................................... 3 6 A. The Settlement Provides a Substantial Monetary Recovery for the Class and Ensures Meaningful Institutional Reforms. ............................. 3 7 8 B. The Innovative Three-Tier Settlement Structure Designed Around Claimant Choice. ...................................................................................... 6 9 C. The Time and Resources Expended to Achieve the Settlement. ............. 8 10 11 III. ARGUMENT ................................................................................................... 10 12 A. Class Counsel’s Fee Request Is Reasonable as a Percentage of the Recovery ................................................................................................ 11 13 14 B. Application of the Lodestar Cross-Check Also Demonstrates That the Fee Requested by Class Counsel Is Reasonable. ............................. 13 15 16 1. Class Counsel’s Hourly Rates Are Reasonable. .......................... 14 17 2. The Amount of Time Class Counsel Devoted Is Reasonable. .... 15 18 3. Class Counsel’s Efficient Resolution of the Case Supports 19 the Requested Fee. ..................................................................... 177 20 a. The Substantial Monetary Relief, Thoughtful Claim Process, and Far-Reaching Reforms Obtained Support 21 the Requested Attorneys’ Fees. ......................................... 18 22 b. The Contingent Nature of the Representation, Delay in 23 Payment, and Risks Class Counsel Assumed Support 24 the Requested Fee. ............................................................. 20 25 c. The Quality of Class Counsel’s Work and Their Experience Support the Fee Request. ................................ 22 26 27 - i - 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 6 of 39 Page ID #:6043 1 C. Class Counsel Should Be Reimbursed for Their Litigation Expenses. ................................................................................................ 23 2 3 D. The Requested Service Awards for Plaintiffs Are Reasonable ............. 24 4 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................................................................ 25 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 - ii - 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 7 of 39 Page ID #:6044 1 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES 2 Page(s) 3 CASES 4 Aichele v. City of Los Angeles, 5 No. CV-12-10863-DMG-FFMx, 2015 WL 5286028 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 9, 2015) ......................................................................................................... 13, 14 6 7 Alikhan v. Goodrich Corp., No. CV17-6756J-GB-RAOx, 2020 WL 4919382 (C.D. Cal. June 25, 8 2020) ................................................................................................................... 15 9 In re Am. Apparel, Inc. S’holder Litig., 10 No. CV10-06352-MMM-JCGx, 2014 WL 10212865 (C.D. Cal. July 28, 2014) ............................................................................................................. 23 11 12 Amador v. Baca, No. 2:10-cv-01649-SVW-JEM, 2020 WL 5628938 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 13 11, 2020) (Wilson, J.) ............................................................................. 12, 20, 24 14 In re Amgen Inc. Sec. Litig., 15 No. CV 7-2536 PSG, 2016 WL 10571773 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2016) ............... 23 16 In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litig., 17 No. 15-MD-02617-LHK, 2018 WL 3960068 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2018) ................................................................................................................... 12 18 19 Bendon v. DTG Operations, Inc., No. EDCV16-0861-FMO-AGRx, 2018 WL 4976511 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 20 22, 2018) ............................................................................................................. 13 21 Blum v. Stenson, 22 465 U.S. 886 (1984) ........................................................................................... 14 23 Brown v. CVS Pharm., Inc., 24 No. CV15-7631 PSG, 2017 WL 3494297 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2017) ............... 25 25 Buccellato v. AT & T Operations, Inc., No. C10-00463-LHK, 2011 WL 3348055 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2011) ......... 18, 19 26 27 - iii - 28 PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR SERVICE AWARDS CASE NO. 2:18-cv-04258-SVW Case 2:18-cv-04258-SVW-GJS Document 180 Filed 04/09/21 Page 8 of 39 Page ID #:6045 1 Campbell v. Facebook, Inc., 951 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2020) ............................................................................ 13 2 3 In re Cardinal Health Inc. Sec. Litig., 528 F. Supp. 2d 752 (S.D. Ohio 2007) ............................................................... 18 4 Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, 5 796 F.2d 1205 (9th Cir. 1986) ............................................................................ 14 6 Craft v. Cty. of San Bernardino, 7 624 F. Supp. 2d 1113 (C.D. Cal. 2008) .................................................. 13, 14, 20 8 Doe v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14A-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED in PROXY STATEMENT Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION (Rule 14a-101) INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant Filed by a party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: Preliminary Proxy Statement Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) Definitive Proxy Statement Definitive Additional Materials Soliciting Material under §240. 14a-12 WEX INC. (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): No fee required. Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: Table of Contents WEX INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism
    i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism May, 2018 United Nations University – Centre for Policy Research The UNU Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR) is a UN-focused think tank based at UNU Centre in Tokyo. UNU-CPR’s mission is to generate policy research that informs major UN policy processes in the fields of peace and security, humanitarian affairs, and global development. i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s Institute for Integrated Transitions IFIT’s aim is to help fragile and conflict-affected states achieve more sustainable transitions out of war or authoritarianism by serving as an independent expert resource for locally-led efforts to improve political, economic, social and security conditions. IFIT seeks to transform current practice away from fragmented interventions and toward more integrated solutions that strengthen peace, democracy and human rights in countries attempting to break cycles of conflict or repression. Cover image nigeria. 2017. Maiduguri. After being screened for association with Boko Haram and held in military custody, this child was released into a transit center and the care of the government and Unicef. © Paolo Pellegrin/Magnum Photos. This material has been supported by UK aid from the UK government; the views expressed are those of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • 418GBJ Web.Pdf
    April 2018 Volume 23, Number 6 From the Executive GEORGIA BAR Director: Website and Directory Enhancements to Benefit Bar Members and the Public Financial Institutions: JOURNAL Protecting Elderly Clients From Financial Exploitation Bending the Arc: Georgia Lawyers in the Pursuit of Social Justice Writing Matters: What e-Filing May Mean to Your Writing 2018 ANNUAL MEETING Amelia Island, Fla. | June 7-10 GEORGIA LAWYERS HELPING LAWYERS Georgia Lawyers Helping Lawyers (LHL) is a new confidential peer-to-peer program that will provide u colleagues who are suffering from stress, depression, addiction or other personal issues in their lives, with a fellow Bar member to be there, listen and help. The program is seeking not only peer volunteers who have experienced particular mental health or substance use u issues, but also those who have experience helping others or just have an interest in extending a helping hand. For more information, visit: www.GeorgiaLHL.org ADMINISTERED BY: DO YOUR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADD UP? Finding the right benets provider doesn’t have to be a calculated risk. Our oerings range from Health Coverage to Disability and everything in between. Through us, your rm will have access to unique cost savings opportunities, enrollment technology, HR Tools, and more! The Private Insurance Exchange + Your Firm = Success START SHOPPING THE PRIVATE INSURANCE EXCHANGE TODAY! www.memberbenets.com/gabar OR CALL (800) 282-8626 APRIL 2018 HEADQUARTERS COASTAL GEORGIA OFFICE SOUTH GEORGIA OFFICE 104 Marietta St. NW, Suite 100 18 E. Bay St. 244 E. Second St. (31794) Atlanta, GA 30303 Savannah, GA 31401-1225 P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 11 Issue 2 Issue 2 - A Symposium on Trade Article 1 Regulation and Practices 3-1958 "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute Heinrich Kronstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Heinrich Kronstein, "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute, 11 Vanderbilt Law Review 271 (1958) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol11/iss2/1 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 11 MARcH, 1958 Nuavim 2 A SYMPOSIUM ON TRADE REGULATION AND PRACTICES "CARTELS" UNDER THE NEW GERMAN CARTEL STATUTE HEINRICH KRONSTEIN* Introduction On January 1, 1958, the "Cartel Statute" of the Federal Republic of Germany' became effective. American interests in this event are threefold: (1) During the past decade Americans have tried to convince the Western world that in an industrial, democratic society legislation of the American antitrust type is imperative. Is the German cartel statute a piece of legislation of this type? (2) The enactment of the statute brings to an end the application of Law No. 56 enacted by the American Military Government on January 28, 1947. The Paris Treaty between the Allied Powers and Germany provided that the Allied "cartel laws," though administered by the German Minister of Economics, should remain in effect until the German legislature could agree on a new statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Levy Konigsberg, L.L.P. JOSEPH ANTHONY JACONIA, Individually
    Levy Konigsberg, L.L.P. Moshe Maimon, Esq. (ID: 04269.1 9 8 6) Daniel LaTerra, Esq. (ID: 033702007) 800 3`d Avenue, 11' floor New York, NY 10022 (212) 605 -6200 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOSEPH ANTHONY JACONIA, individually SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY and as Executor and Executor ad LAW DIVISION-MIDDLESEX Prosequendum of the Estate of LAMONA COUNTY JACONIA, DOCKET NO. MID -L- 2995- 17(AS) Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION ASBESTOS LITIGATION 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., et al. AMENDED Defendants. CROSS -NOTICE OF DEPOSITION To: Jacqueline Bushwack RIVKIN RADLER, LLO 926 RXR Plaza Uniondale, NY 11566 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that in accordance with Rule 4:14-2 and 4:14-9 of the New Jersey Court Rules, Plaintiff by his attorneys, Levy Konigsberg LLP, will take the testimony upon oral and videotaped examination of Defendant AVON PRODUCTS, INC. ( "AVON "). The deposition will take place before a person authorized to administer oaths on Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 9:30AM EST, continuing day -to -day thereafter as needed, at the Doubletree I-Tilton Nanuet, 425 NY -59, Nanuet, NY 10954. The deponent shall produce all documents responsive to the requests set forth in in the attached Schedule A no later than ten (10) business days before the beginning of the deposition. {00399195.DOCX) For purposes of this deposition notice and the requests made herein, the following definition; shall apply: A. "Avon" shall mean Avon Products, Inc., including all past and current employees, officer and directors, and all predecessor and/or successor companies, as well as all companies fro whom Avon acquired the assets and/or liabilities of a talcum powder product.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 for 1H 2015
    ` Top 100 for 1H 2015 Securities Class Action Services, LLC Published: September 28, 2015 Executive Summary ISS Securities Class Action Services tracked 61 settlements for the first half of 2015, up from from 53 settlements seen duringthe first half of 2014. Out of the 61 settlement agreements, five settlements ranked in the ISS Securities Class Action Services Top 100 for 1H 2015, which amounted for a 450 percent increase in settlement funds when compared to the same period in the previous year. The cases identified include: › American International Group, Inc. (2008) (S.D.N.Y.), which brought the highest settlement fund($900 million for approximately 200 eligible securities). › Bear Stearns Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates › IndyMac Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates (Individual & Underwriter Defendants) › Activision Blizzard, Inc. › Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) (2008) Out of the five settlements, four were filed in the federal courts during the midst of the financial credit crisis, while one was filed in the state court relating to the company’s private sale transaction. Two of the five were alleged violating Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Employment of Manipulative and Deceptive Practices) while three were alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (Civil Liabilities on Account of False Registration Statement). Two of the five settlements relate to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and have restated their financial during the relevant periods. Of the five settlements, two were identified in the S&P Index. One SEC initiated settlement placed in the Top 30 SEC Disgorgement amounting to $200 Million. The Securities Class Action Services Tentative Settlement Pipeline stands $17.3 Billion as of 31 July 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • May Your Drug Price Be Evergreen
    Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 590–647 doi:10.1093/jlb/lsy022 Advance Access Publication 7 December 2018 Original Article May your drug price be evergreen ∗,1 Robin Feldman Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/5/3/590/5232981 by Elsevier user on 30 October 2020 Hastings College of the Law, University of California, 200 McAllister St. San Francisco, CA 94102, USA Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Presenting the first comprehensive study of evergreening, this article ex- amines the extent to which evergreening behavior—which can be defined as artificially extending the protection cliff—may contribute to theprob- lem. The author analyses all drugs on the market between 2005 and 2015, combing through 60,000 data points to examine every instance in which a company added a new patent or exclusivity. The results show a startling departure from the classic conceptualization of intellectual property pro- tection for pharmaceuticals. Rather than creating new medicines, pharma- ceutical companies are largely recycling and repurposing old ones. Specifi- cally, 78% of the drugs associated with new patents were not new drugs, but ∗ Robin Feldman is the Arthur J. Goldberg Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Institute for Innovation Law at the University of California Hastings. Her most recent books in the life sciences are Drug Wars (Cambridge) and Rethinking Patent Law (Harvard). Professor Feldman also has published more than 50 articles in law journals including at Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, as well as in the American Economic Review and the New England Journal of Medicine. Professor Feldman’s empirical work has been cited by the White House and numerous federal agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, Dktentry: 78-1, Page 1 of 64
    Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, DktEntry: 78-1, Page 1 of 64 Case No. 13-16819 (Consolidated with Nos. 13-16918, 13-16919, 13-16929, 13-16936, 13-17028, 13-17097) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANGEL FRALEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs and Appellees, C.M.D., ET AL., Intervenors, Plaintiffs, and Appellees, JO BATMAN, ET AL., Objectors and Appellants v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant and Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California No. 11-cv-0126, Hon. Richard Seeborg, presiding ANSWERING BRIEF OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES SUSAN MAINZER, ET AL. THE ARNS LAW FIRM JONATHAN JAFFE LAW Robert S. Arns (SBN 65071) Jonathan M. Jaffe, Esq. (SBN 267012) 3055 Hillegass Avenue Jonathan E. Davis (SBN 191346) Berkeley, CA 94705 Steven R. Weinmann (SBN 190956) Telephone: (510) 725-4293 515 Folsom Street, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 495-7800 Facsimile: (415) 495-7888 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Case: 13-16918, 05/30/2014, ID: 9114889, DktEntry: 78-1, Page 2 of 64 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT ............................................................. 1 II. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 III. SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ........................................................... 7 IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY ................. 10 A. Background ................................................................................................. 10 B. Settlement Negotiations
    [Show full text]
  • Lanzo -Filed-Complaint-1.Pdf
    8 .4 'I SZAFERIVIAN, LAKIND, ?. Qu. \".i\\§ 'U BLUMSTEIN & BLADER I P.C. M C\ \ By Robert E. Lytle, Esq. (NJ ID# 046331990) *1 \%`- '§i"'@4 9, AJ 'T'.L.» J 101 Grovers mill Road, Suite 200 x.9 g" i \\.vu\ 1 ~. "\'\ A Lawrenceville, N.J. 08648 \ 1 ,.,\,L °» i \\ 'U (609) 275-0400 9 LEVY KONIGS8ERG, LLP By: Moshe Maimon, Esq. (NJ ID N0.042691986) 101 Grovers mill Road, Suite 200 Lawrenceville, N.J, 08648 (609) 720-0400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STEPHEN LANZQ, III and KENDRA SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LANZO, LAW DIVISION, MIDDLESEX COUNTY Plaintiffs, DOCKET NO C 1vIID-L- -l6As V I CYPRUS AMAX MINERALS COMPANY, Civil Action - Asbestos individually and as LiSiqation successor-in-interest to American Tale Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, "r Inc. , Charles Mathieu, Inc., MlD-L- 7385.=~16 Resource Processors, Inc. and Windsor Minerals, Inc. i CYPRUS MINERAL CO. r individually and as successor- in-interest to American Talc Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc. , Charles Mathieu, Inc. , ResOurce processors, Inc. and Windsor Minerals, Inc., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. I f/k/a Luzenac America, Inc. , individually and as CQMPLAINT, JURY DEMAND, DEMAND successor-in-interest to FOR ANSWERS TO STANDARD Windsor Minerals, lnc., INTERROGATORIES AND JOHNSON & JOHNSON; DESIGNATION OF TRIAL COUNSEL JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. ; WHITTAKER CLARK s DANIELS, INC. , individually and as successor- in-interest to American Talc 2315995.1 I Company, Metropolitan Talc Company, Inc. , Charles Mathieu, Inc. , and Resource Processors, Inc. , John Doe Corporations 1-50; John Doe Corporations 51-100, Defendants. Plaintiffs, Stephen Lanzo, III and Kendra Lanzo, by way of complaint against Defendants allege and say: PARTIES PLAINTIFFS 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Android OS Security: Risks and Limitations a Practical Evaluation
    FRAUNHOFER RESEARCH INSTITUTION FOR APPLIED AND INTEGRATED SECURITY ANDROID OS SECURITY: RISKS AND LIMITATIONS A PRACTICAL EVALUATION RAFAEL FEDLER, CHRISTIAN BANSE, CHRISTOPH KRAUSS, AND VOLKER FUSENIG 5/2012 Android OS Security: Risks and Limitations A Practical Evaluation Version 1.0 Rafael Fedler, Christian Banse, Christoph Krauß, and Volker Fusenig Contact: [email protected] AISEC Technical Reports AISEC-TR-2012-001 May 2012 Fraunhofer Research Institution AISEC Parkring 4 85748 Garching Abstract The number of Android-based smartphones is growing rapidly. They are increas- ingly used for security-critical private and business applications, such as online banking or to access corporate networks. This makes them a very valuable tar- get for an adversary. Up to date, significant or large-scale attacks have failed, but attacks are becoming more sophisticated and successful. Thus, security is of paramount importance for both private and corporate users. In this paper, we give an overview of the current state of the art of Android security and present our extensible automated exploit execution framework. First, we provide a sum- mary of the Android platform, current attack techniques, and publicly known exploits. Then, we introduce our extensible exploit execution framework which is capable of performing automated vulnerability tests of Android smartphones. It incorporates currently known exploits, but can be easily extended to integrate future exploits. Finally, we discuss how malware can propagate to Android smart- phones today and in the future, and which possible threats arise. For example, device-to-device infections are possible if physical access is given. NES Research Department at Fraunhofer AISEC The Fraunhofer Research Institution for Applied and Integrated Security AISEC1 is one leading expert for applied IT security and develops solutions for immediate use, tailored to the customer’s needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Guide
    Access to Justice Conference Guide National Association of Women Judges 39th Annual Conference October 11-15, 2017 I Atlanta, GA I Sheraton Atlanta Hotel Welcome Message From the Conference Chairs Dear Friends: Welcome to Atlanta! Once again, we are proud to host We are delighted to host a number of judges who will a conference of the National Association of Women be attending NAWJ’s conference for the first time and Judges. Some of you may remember the NAWJ from other countries. We look forward to hearing from Midyear Conference in 2009 when we showcased them about their personal experiences on and off the the latest challenges facing child well-being while bench. Networking has always been an important part visiting Atlanta’s famous Buckhead neighborhood. of these meetings and we expect the receptions and Since 2009, there have been many changes in Atlanta, the hospitality room to provide a wonderful ambience including the revitalization of downtown where we for these opportunities. We look forward to sharing will be located. Conference attendees will have the these experiences with you and hope that you will opportunity to visit the beautiful and historical Elbert P. return home, enriched in mind and spirit, with many Tuttle U.S. Court of Appeals Building, the South Fulton new friends. Municipal Regional Jail, and the Carter Center, and participate in a Civil Rights Tour of approximately 20 Many thanks to our own President Tanya R. Kennedy significant historic locations. and to our Immediate Past President, the Honorable Diana Becton, our Friends Committee Co-Chairs Allegra This year’s Annual Conference theme is ‘Access to J.
    [Show full text]
  • Powershift Transmissions, Type Ecomat (1), for Buses, Trucks, and Special Vehicles List of Lubricants TE-ML 14
    Commercial Vehicle Technology Powershift transmissions, type Ecomat (1), for buses, trucks, and special vehicles List of lubricants TE-ML 14 Table of contents Page 1. Approved lubricant classes ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Table 1: Oil and filter change intervals for Ecomat transmissions in buses: ..........................................................................................2 Table 2: Oil and filter change intervals for Ecomat transmissions in trucks, off-road equipment and special vehicles:.........................2 2. Explanation of footnotes and comments ............................................................................................................................................3 3. Lubricant classes and approved trade products ................................................................................................................................4 1. Approved lubricant classes Product groups Lubricant classes for service fills Ecomat (Oil sump temperatures below 100°C) (3) 14A / 14B / 14C / 14E HP500, HP590, HP600 Automatic Transmission Fluids (ATF) HP502C, HP552C, HP592C, HP602C, Refer to the following pages for approved commercial products HP504C, HP554C, and oil change intervals HP594C, HP604C Particularly recommended: Ecomat HL (Oil sump temperatures below 100°C) (3) ZF-Ecofluid A Life (14E) (2) HP900, HP902 Ecomat (Oil sump temperatures below 105°C) (4) HP502C,
    [Show full text]