Appendix 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 2019 APPENDIX to the Kansas Department of Transportation’s 2019 Annual Report This appendix contains additional transportation information including: • Financial Compliance Section A • Project Selection Criteria • Project list detailing projects currently scheduled for improvement, projects completed in FY 2018 and projects under construction. Also list of aviation, rail and public transit projects. • Transportation Revolving Fund • Modal Information • Federal Fund Exchange Program Financial Compliance Each year, the Department provides financial information to CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP, is included in the CAFR after audit the Governor and Legislature. This information includes both a completion. Also included in the CAFR is a certificate of summary of financial information and a statement of assurance that achievement awarded to the Department for excellence in financial a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) of all funds for reporting for the FY 2017 CAFR. This award marks the 30th the preceding year has been prepared. The financial report must consecutive year that the Department has received the award. include a report by independent public accountants attesting that The complete CAFR is available by contacting the Department’s the financial statements present fairly the financial position of the Office of Public Affairs at 785-296-3585 (Voice)/(TTY). The FY Department in conformity with generally accepted accounting 2018 CAFR is available under the KDOT Financial Disclosures principles (GAAP). section of the Department’s website at http://www.ksdot.org/ The Department has prepared a CAFR for Fiscal Year bureaus/burFiscal/default.asp. (FY) 2018. A report of the independent public accountants, A-1 FY 2018 Financial Information Percent 2018 o f To t a l The following schedule is a summary of revenues and expenditures for all funds for Expansion and enhancement 140,191 9 % FY 2018. All amounts are in thousands. Communications system 4,647 0 Local Support 283,129 17 Rail, Air and Public Trans. 56,188 3 Percent Administration and 2018 o f To t a l transportation planning 46,014 3 REVENUES Debt Service Motor Fuel Taxes $ 458,792 28 % Principal 108,285 7 Vehicle Registrations Interest and fees 89,223 5 and Permits 218,765 13 Transfers to Other Intergovernmental 404,818 25 State Funds 530,715 32 Sales and Use Taxes 530,765 33 Investment Earnings 5,980 0 Total expenditures 1,646,435 100 % Other 12,368 1 Transfers from OTHER SOURCES (uses) Other State Funds 1,101 0 Revenue Bond Proceeds 200,000 83 Total revenues 1,632,589 100 % Premium on Issuance of Debt 42,212 17 Loss on defeasance (158) 0 EXPENDITURES Total other 242,054 100 % Current Operating Maintenance 131,099 8 % Preservation 210,364 13 Excess (Deficiency) of Modernization 46,580 3 Revenues and Other Sources Over Expenditures 228,208 100 % A-2 Project Selection Criteria with selections now made on a 2-year rolling basis to create greater Fiscal Year 2019 begins the 9th year of the 10-year transportation programming flexibility while in the past program, the CTP, all major program enacted by the Kansas Legislature in May 2010. As projects were selected once at the start of each program. Extending T-WORKS nears completion members from the legislature, project selections over the life of T-WORKS has increased KDOT’s Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) leadership and responsiveness to changing roadway conditions and economic local stakeholders have jointly begun to explore the future of changes as they arise. By implementing these project selection transportation in Kansas in the “Joint Legislative Transportation changes, KDOT has developed greater stakeholder input, gained Vision Task Force” meetings conducted across the state this past more flexibility in projects selected and increased maneuverability to summer and fall. These informational discussions were held to respond to the prevailing economic conditions. assess transportation needs and concerns across the state and to lay Under T-WORKS construction projects are categorized into four the ground work for the next transportation program. It is vital that core programs: Preservation, Modernization, Expansion and Local this process begins now to ensure that KDOT is able to continue to Construction. The four core programs group construction projects deliver high-quality transportation infrastructure to Kansans and is with similar work types and scopes together. Projects within each able to respond to emerging transportation needs. While exploring of these major programs are further grouped together based upon and planning for the years beyond T-WORKS, KDOT is committed similar funding sources or project-types into more specific groups or to the execution of the remaining years of the current program. subcategories. In the new project selection process, there are evalua- KDOT leadership employs many tools in the development tion criterion applied for project selections in the core programs. and execution of a transportation program and project selection For the Preservation program, engineering factors are an process beginning with the guidance from two plans. The 2008 effective evaluation method for project selection and remain the sole Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), which outlines high-level factor used for selecting projects in this program. However, in the goals and the newly developed Transportation Asset Management Modernization and Expansion programs, engineering factors are Plan (TAMP) which provides a detailed assessment of current augmented with other factors. In the Modernization program, project infrastructure and the effort and funding levels needed to maintain selection combines historically strong engineering-based formulas said infrastructure. Together the LRTP and TAMP, provide direction with regional priorities and in the Expansion program, project and focus for KDOT management establishing a framework for selections combine engineering factors with regional priorities and day-to-day decision-making processes. Under T-WORKS, KDOT economic impacts. In each of the programs, proposed projects developed a more strategic approach to highway project selection are scored and ranked based upon how well the proposed projects than previously used in the Comprehensive Transportation Program address the relevant evaluation criteria. Then, selections are made (CTP) which based project selection solely on engineering factors. based upon the combined information. The addition of these new In T-WORKS, while engineering factors still play an important role factors helps ensure that a project is not only a sound engineering in project selections, they have been augmented with economic project but is also a project that aligns with the goals and priorities impact evaluation and/or local input in two of the primary of a region and in the case of expansion projects provides economic programs. Additionally, the timing of projects selected to proceed to benefits. Project selection for the fourth core program, Local construction for the larger scale Preservation projects has changed Construction, remains unchanged and is determined at the local A-3 like minor bridge repairs, resurfacing, patching and seals. T-WORKS Project Selection Criteria The engineering factors used when selecting Program Engineering Regional Economic Other preservation projects relate to the pavement and bridge Factors Priorities Impact conditions, like remaining pavement life, rutting, and cracking for roads and joint or bridge deck condition and/ Preservation 100% or load ratings for bridges. Roads and bridges are evaluated Modernization 80% 20% on an annual basis and projects are selected each year based upon this review. Additionally, within the preservation Expansion 50% 25% 25% program, are a group of “other” set-aside projects that are unrelated to road condition but, rather, address such Local Construction 100% issues as signing, pavement markings and railroad crossing surfaces. Set-aside projects are so named because the funds level by local entities throughout the state with the coordination of to perform the work is “set aside” or reserved specifically for the KDOT’s Bureau of Local Projects. type of work designated by the set-aside subcategory. The “other” The chart above illustrates the selection criteria applied to set-aside group of projects are generally federally funded while the T-WORKS projects in each of the four core programs and the weight road and bridge set-aside projects were traditionally state funded. given to each criterion. Recently, however, federal funds have been applied to the road Engineering factors for the preservation, modernization and and bridge set-aside projects as well. The road, bridge and other expansion programs are evaluated using the engineering-based set-aside group of projects are selected on an annual basis while the formulas KDOT already has established. Regional priorities are larger scale preservation projects use the rolling two-year selection determined through local-consult meetings held throughout the process. Since most projects in the Preservation program are state with the most recent held this fall. Through these meetings selected annually and the work involved rarely requires more than and through the continued interaction between the area and district one season to complete, the majority of the preservation projects engineers with local entities, KDOT maintains a dialogue with listed in this report are for work to be performed in fiscal year stakeholders throughout the state
Recommended publications
  • City-Wide Master Plan
    City-Wide Master Plan JULY 2008 UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY / KANSAS CITY, KANSAS Acknowledgements Mayor/CEO Steering Committee Subcommittees Mayor Joe Reardon Cassandra Pennington Harper Crime Scott Grable Micky Davis Board of Commissioners Bryan Messmer Phillip Roland Gilbert a. Pintar Commissioner Bill Miller Harold Simons Jack Yunghans Ed Rust Commissioner Nathan Barnes Phillip W. Roland Commissioner Don DeSeure Murray Rhodes Education Commissioner Mark Mitchell Dave Holtwick Commissioner Ann Murguia Gary D. Grable Gillian Franklin Nolen Ellison Commissioner Butch Ellison Warrick Graves Commissioner Mark Holland Pamela Penn-Hicks Mark Nidiffer Phillip Roland Commissioner Tom Cooley Daniel Serda Commissioner Pat Huggins Pettey Ray Daniels Michael Davis Ed Rust Commissioner Mike Kane Donald E. Budd, Jr. Thomas Barnes Infrastructure City Planning Commission Willie Smith Jack Yunghans Alvey, David Rick Yarnell Thomas Barnes Angelotti, David Mike Bixler Willie Smith Bohon, Elizabeth (Beth) Marty Thoennes Murray Rhodes Dercher, Ann Anne McDonald Don Budd Huey, Joanne Cindy Cash Hurrelbrink, David Nolen Ellison Mohler, Mark Victor Hernandez Prepared by: Schwartzman, Jim Wendell Maddox HNTB Corporation Walden, Wayne Cordell Meeks III Pamela Penn-Hicks Nimisha Agrawal Walker, Cardelia Brian Comer Harold Simmons Watson, Robert Joy Osborne Susan Carroll Wayne Feuerborn Unified Government Staff Ray Daniels Rodney Riffle Gary Grable Rob Richardson, Director Beatrice Lee Collins Noteis and Associates Larry Hancks Maureen Mahoney Brad
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Estate Report for Metropolitan Kansas City 2020
    The Real Estate Report For Metropolitan Kansas City 2020 Block Real Estate Services, LLC 700 W. 47th Street, Suite 200 | Kansas City, MO 64112 816.756-1400 | www.BLOCKLLC.com BLOCK REAL ESTATE SERVICES, LLC (BRES) Table of Contents HIGHLIGHTS OF 2019 SUCCESS ABOUNDS IN KANSAS CITY _______________1 Transactions BRES completed the year with total GLOBAL, U.S., KANSAS CITY OVERVIEW ____________6 sales and leasing transactions in excess of $1.1 billion. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT ___________________29 Property Management BRES commercial management OFFICE MARKET ______________________________35 portfolio reached over 43.12 million square feet of commercial space. INDUSTRIAL MARKET __________________________43 Construction RETAIL MARKET ______________________________53 Block Construction Services (BCS) managed over $130 million INVESTMENT MARKET _________________________58 of development projects and coordinated over $11 million in tenant improvement work in 2019. INVESTORS CHART AND SALES RECORDS __________68 Development projects and tenant improvements under construction in MULTIFAMILY MARKET _________________________69 2019 included work in all sectors, including office, industrial/warehouse/ BLOCK INCOME FUNDS ________________________73 distribution, multifamily, and retail. Investment Syndication BLOCK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES ________________74 BRES completed over $376 million BLOCK HEALTHCARE DEVELOPMENT _____________76 in investment sales and raised over $107 million in equity funds for syndication of new acquisitions BLOCK MULTIFAMILY GROUP ___________________78 and development projects. ECONOMIC INDICATORS _______________________79 Affiliates Block Hawley Commercial Real Estate, LLC ranks as one of the most active industrial brokerage firms in St. Louis, with approximately 2 million square feet of listed property and nearly 4 million square feet under management. Block Multifamily Group, (BMG) now manages approximately 5,500 units with approximately an additional 2,000 in either development or construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Transportation Policy Committee
    OPEN MEETING NOTICE Goods Movement COMMITTEE Janet McRae Kansas Co-Chair Richard Grenville, Missouri Co-Chair There will be a meeting of MARC’s Goods Movement Committee on Tuesday, October 3, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in MARC’s Heartland Room, 600 Broadway, Ste. 200 Kansas City, MO A G E N D A I. Introduction and approval of minutes II. KDOT’s Truck Parking Information and Management System (TPMS) - Brian Comer, HNTB A real-time Truck Parking information system that allows truckers to make smarter, more efficient truck parking decisions. III. Membership in the Kansas and Missouri STP Committees -- Darryl Fields MARC Membership form the Goods Movement Committee on the KS/MO STP Committees IV. Review interactive freight map (Beta) - Darryl Fields http://marc- gis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=03db7764e8a14972a20d7d9fd51fdbef Beta version on the MARC Freight Map review -- Committee review for additional items V. KS Critical Urban Freight Corridors (CUFC)- Darryl Fields KDOT concurrence and next steps VI. Other Business Getting to MARC: Information on transportation options to the MARC offices, including directions, parking, transit, carpooling, and bicycling, can be found online. If driving, visitors and guests should enter the Rivergate Center parking lot from Broadway and park on the upper level of the garage. An entrance directly into the conference area is available from this level. Parking: Free parking is available when visiting MARC. Visitors and guests should park on the upper level of the garage. To enter this level from Broadway, turn west into the Rivergate Center parking lot. Please use any of the available spaces on the upper level at the top of the ramp.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Audit Report
    PERFORMANCE AUDIT REPORT REVIEWING THE OPERATIONS OF THE KANSAS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY A Report to the Legislative Post Audit Committee By the Legislative Division of Post Audit State of Kansas January 1994 94-30 Legislative Post Audit Committee Legislative Division of Post Audit The legislative Post Audit Committee and its audit members of the Legislative Post Audit Committee (in­ agency, the Legislative Division of Post Audit, are the cluding the Chairman and Vice-Chairman), the Secre­ audit arm of Kansas government. The programs and tary of Administration, and the Legislative Post Auditor. activities of State government now cost about $6 billion This audit work also meets the State's audit responsi­ a year. As legislators and administrators try increas­ bilities under the federal Single Audit Act of 1984. ingly to allocate tax dollars effectively and make gov­ Second, the Act provides for a regular audit pres­ ernment work more efficiently, they need information to ence in every State agency by requiring that audit work evaluate the work of govemment agencies. The audit be conducted at each agency at least once every three work performed by Legislative Post Audit helps provide years. Audit work done in addition to the annual finan­ that information. Cial statement audit focuses on compliance with legal We conduct our audit work in accordance with and procedural requirements and on the adequacy of applicable government auditing standards set forth by the audited agency's internal control procedures in ar­ the U. S. General Accounting Office. These standards eas not covered by the annual audit. These compli­ pertain to the auditor's professional qualifications, the ance and control audits are conducted by the Division's quality of the audit work, and the characteristics of pro­ staff under the direction of the Legislative Post Audit fessional and meaningful reports.
    [Show full text]
  • "SILVER CITY," a HISTORY of the ARGENTINE COMMUNITY of KANSAS CITY, KANSAS a Thesis Presented to the Division of S
    "SILVER CITY," A HISTORY OF THE ARGENTINE COMMUNITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS A Thesis Presented to the Division of Social Sciences Emporia Kansas State College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Edwin Dale Shutt II August 1974 T r~ ~ 91~./JI~~ ~roved for the Major Department ~. ~-e.J' (I 4- ... -_-.------:r ,-It' <....G- -' u.~ Approved for the Graduate Council i 35~304 u OUTLINE Preface and Acknowledgements Chapter I Early Beginnings Chapter II The Founding of the Town Chapter III The Argentine Smelter Chapter IV Castle on a Hill Chapter V The Kansas City Structural Steel Company Chapter VI Tales of Floods and Disasters Chapter VII History of the Schools Chapter VIII Mr. Argentine Chapter IX The Argentine Community Today Appendix I List of Businesses in the Town of Argentine in 1908 Appendix II Partial List of BUildings Constructed in the Greater Kansas City Area by the Kansas City Structural Steel Company Appendix III Community Organizations Appendix IV Partial Listing of Prominent Citizens in the Town's Past Bibliography if PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the flat bottomlanda of the Kaw River, about three miles from its mouth, lies the Argentine community of Kanaaa City, Kansas. The Argentine community has a colorful past. Founded in 1880, this town was the headquarters of the Kansas City Consolidated Smelting and Refining Company. A large smelter plant was maintained at Argentine. This smelter had the reputation of being the largest in the world, both in terms of capacity and in the value of the ore refined.
    [Show full text]
  • I-70 Corridor
    I-70 Corridor Corridor Profile I-70 Figure 14-3: Traffic Volumes along I-70 N N Length: 51 miles Key Developments: Berry Plastics Cerner Community America Ballpark Cricket Wireless Amphitheater Downtown Kansas City, Kansas Downtown Lawrence Hollywood Casino I--70 Business Center Indian Springs Sporting Park Kansas City Kansas Community College Kansas Speedway Schlitterbahn Waterpark Village West 69 I-70 Corridor EXPANSION & MODERNIZATION T-WORKS PROJECTS CURRENTLY FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION In May 2010, the Kansas Legislature passed Transportation Works for Kansas (T-WORKS), an $8 billion 10- year transportation program. T-WORKS is designed to create jobs, preserve highway infrastructure, and provide multimodal economic development opportunities across the state. Table 14-4 lists the expansion and modernization projects that are funded through T-WORKS along the I-70 corridor. Table 14-4: T-WORKS Expansion and Modernization Projects Currently Funded for Construction Project Construction Planned Location Description Number Cost Year DESCRIPTION OF THE CORRIDOR terminus (K-7 and I-70 interchange) of the KTA managed 4 I-70 from I-435 to State Line I-70 Real Time Traveler Information $621,000 2012 I-70 is one of two major east-west routes through the roads to Topeka are $2.75 each way, with an average 20 5-County region and one of two major interstates in percent discount for K-TAG automated toll participants. 6 I-70 & K-7 Interchange Improvements $68 M 2013 Kansas linking to other states. I-70 is a toll facility from While outside the study region, it is significant to note that west of the study region to the East Toll Plaza 13 miles I-70 winds through the central business district of Kansas City, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Highway Legislation and Transportation, January 2017
    CHRONOLOGY OF SELECTED FEDERAL-STATE HIGHWAY LEGISLATION AND TRANSPORTATION-RELATED ACTIVITY 1880-2016 Kansas Legislative Research Department 300 SW 10th Avenue Room 68-West, Statehouse Topeka, KS 66612-1504 785-296-3181 http://www.kslegislature.org/klrd January 2017 CHRONOLOGY OF SELECTED FEDERAL-STATE HIGHWAY LEGISLATION AND HIGHWAY-RELATED LEGISLATION The purpose of this chronology is to assist readers in their search for knowledge regarding the history and development of the highway and road program in Kansas. Many sources were relied upon to provide the reader with important transportation-related information, including federal and state laws, federal publications, Kansas Legislative Research Department publications, and other works of highway-related interest. An appendix at the back of this document cites specific sources used to produce this chronology; it is followed by an index. Entries for 1880 through 2007 were compiled by Hank Avila, Research Analyst, Kansas Legislative Research Department (KLRD), and released in October 2008. Contributors to subsequent entries include KLRD staff members Conrad Imel, Whitney Howard, and Jill Shelley. Kansas Legislative Research Department 2 Chronology of Highway Legislation January 17, 2017 1880 The League of American Wheelman formed the Good Roads Movement to lead efforts to use state funds for local road construction. The League claimed that good highways would raise land values, open new markets, end rural poverty, increase political participation by farmers, and improve education.1 1892 The National League for Good Roads was founded “to awaken general interest in the improvement of public roads, determine the best methods of building and maintaining them, secure the legislation, state or national, that may be necessary for their establishment and support, and conduct or foster such publications as may serve these purposes.” 1893 Federal funding to pave roads began with the establishment of the Office of Road Inquiry, within the Department of Agriculture.
    [Show full text]