DOCSLIB.ORG

Durham E-Theses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses A Theology of Failure: Ontology and Desire in Slavoj iºek and Christian Apophaticism ROSE, CHRISTA,MARIKA How to cite: ROSE, CHRISTA,MARIKA (2014) A Theology of Failure: Ontology and Desire in Slavoj iºek and Christian Apophaticism, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10666/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Marika Rose A Theology of Failure: Ontology and Desire in Slavoj Žižek and Christian Apophaticism This thesis offers a re-reading of the Christian apophatic tradition via the work of Slavoj Žižek in order to articulate an account of Christian theology and identity as failure, as constituted by a commitment to Christ as both its cornerstone and the stone on which it stumbles. In Dionysius the Areopagite’s marriage of Christian theology with Neoplatonism, the ontology of Neoplatonism is brought into uncomfortable but productive tension with key themes in Christian theology. These tensions are a crucial aspect of Dionysius' legacy, visible not only in subsequent theological thought but also in much twentieth century continental philosophy as it seeks to disentangle itself from its Christian ancestry. Twentieth century discussions of the relationship between apophatic theology and continental philosophy attempt to grapple with this inheritance. The work of Slavoj Žižek, I argue, is an attempt to move beyond the impasses of twentieth century philosophy not by escaping but by returning to metaphysics, drawing on the work of Hegel and Lacan in order to articulate an account of the material world as an intrinsically ruptured economy. This form repeats itself in those structures which subsequently emerge from the material world – in particular, the structures of the individual subject and of the social order and the ways in which both are constituted by desire. This thesis traces the implications of this peculiar ontology through, first, the Derridean problematic of the gift and, second, the Žižekian problematic of violence (both of which, I argue, are structurally homologous with the Christian theological problematics of creation and fall). The thesis offers a critical and theological engagement with Žižek's ontological and erotic account of transformation before returning to Dionysius in order to demonstrate how Žižek's work makes possible a materialist reading of apophatic theology and Christian commitment to the church. A Theology of Failure: Ontology and Desire in Slavoj Žižek and Christian Apophaticism Marika Rose Thesis submitted to Durham University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Research conducted in the Department of Theology and Religion 2014 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 4 Statement of copyright ...................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 The linguistic turn............................................................................................ 11 1.2 On the economic problem ............................................................................... 13 1.3 Structure of the thesis ...................................................................................... 17 1.4 Failure and fidelity .......................................................................................... 21 2. Ontology and Desire in Dionysius the Areopagite ...................................................... 24 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 24 2.2 Dionysius ......................................................................................................... 25 2.3 Eros and ontology ............................................................................................ 27 2.4 Freedom ........................................................................................................... 29 2.5 Materiality ....................................................................................................... 31 2.6 Hierarchy ......................................................................................................... 35 2.7 Universalism .................................................................................................... 40 2.8 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 42 3. Apophatic theology and its vicissitudes ...................................................................... 43 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 43 3.2 Derrida and Dionysius ..................................................................................... 45 3.2.1 Freedom ............................................................................................... 50 3.2.2 Materiality............................................................................................ 51 3.2.3 Hierarchy ............................................................................................. 51 3.2.4 Universalism ........................................................................................ 53 3.2.5 Ontology and desire ............................................................................. 54 3.3 Dionysius, Derrida and Radical Orthodoxy .................................................... 55 3.3.1 Freedom ............................................................................................... 57 3.3.2 Materiality............................................................................................ 58 3.3.3 Hierarchy ............................................................................................. 60 3.3.4 Universalism ........................................................................................ 62 3.3.5 Ontology and desire ............................................................................. 63 3.4 Dionysius, Derrida and John Caputo ............................................................... 64 3.4.1 Freedom ............................................................................................... 66 3.4.2 Materiality............................................................................................ 67 3.4.3 Hierarchy ............................................................................................. 68 3.4.4 Universalism ........................................................................................ 70 3.4.5 Ontology and desire ............................................................................. 71 3.5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 72 4. The death drive ............................................................................................................ 73 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 73 4.2 Freud on the death drive .................................................................................. 74 4.3 Lacan on the death drive ................................................................................. 77 4.4 Žižek on the death drive .................................................................................. 84 4.5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 89 5. Ontology and the death drive in Slavoj Žižek ............................................................. 91 5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 91 5.2 Ontology and the death drive .......................................................................... 93 2 5.3 Freedom and the death drive ........................................................................... 95 5.4 Materiality and the death drive ...................................................................... 101 5.5 Hierarchy and the death drive ....................................................................... 110 5.6 Universalism and the death drive .................................................................. 112 5.7 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 114 6. The Gift ..................................................................................................................... 115 6.1 Introduction
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dialectics, Difference, Weak Thought
    1 Dialectics, Difference, Weak Thought GIANNI VATTIMO In this essay I will try to sketch the main tenets of weak thought, il pensiero debole, and how it is related to dialectics and difference. This connection is not to be understood mainly or solely as an “overcoming” but, rather, it is to be defined primarily in terms of the Heideggerian notion ofVerwindung , a term whose sense also must be understood within the horizon of a “weak” notion of what it means to think. We cannot in any case read the relationship between these three terms as if we were talking of a passage from one to the other. Weak thought has not entirely left dialectics and difference behind; rather, they constitute for it a past in the Heideggerian sense of Gewesenes, which has to do with the idea of sending [invio] and destiny. With these premises, however, I am not saying that to take dialectics and difference as a point of departure requires I take a theoretical stance which would need to be radically justified, assuming that it could. In the present context, these two terms are “givens” of destiny understood as trans- mission: they are points of reference we encounter each and every time we engage in thinking, here and now. It is probably only “strong” thought, that of deductive cogency, which fears letting the initial move escape, the move after which everything falls into place. And yet the question of beginnings cannot be avoided even from the standpoint of a weak notion of thinking. Weak thought presupposes that, contrary to the heavily metaphysical frame- work beneath the problem of beginnings (starting from the first principles of Being), and contrary moreover to a historicist metaphysics (in Hegel’s sense, in which Being has no first principles but is rather a providential process: to think means to be up on the times), a third way may be possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Post-Secular Debate
    The Post-Secular Debate: Introductory Remarks Camil Ungureanu and Lasse Thomassen* Some scholars have recently expressed their doubts about the popular use of the term “post-secularism” and suggested that it is merely a short-lived fashion in social theory and philosophy, all too often used to gain access to research grants.1 Veit Bader may be perfectly right about the term itself, for in time it may indeed fall into disregard and disappear from use. Skepticism about its inflationary use is, we think, warranted. However, we also submit that, if severed from the temptation of proposing a new grand narrative, “post-secularism” can be useful for designating a socio-cultural phenomenon that will not wither away any time soon. Let us first consider the inflationary reading according to which the “return” of religion is interpreted as the shift to a new age or to a new type of society coming after the secular one. According to this influential reading, advanced by philosophers as different as Jürgen Habermas, John D. Caputo, and Gianni Vattimo, in this new age a transformed religion may play a fundamental role in the socio-political sphere and enable individuals to overcome unhelpful divisions between faith and reason. Habermas, for one, speaks of a new “post-secular society” in which religious and non- * Department of Social and Political Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain. Email: camil.ungureanu@ upf.edu. School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary, University of London. Email: [email protected] 1 religious citizens engage, predominantly in the social-public sphere, in a process of mutual learning and reconciliation through dialogue and the exchange of reasons.2 For Habermas, religious and non-religious citizens can attain agreements and enrich public discourse by means of a rational dialogue, understood, in large part, as leading to the translation of sacred language into secular language.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-2021 Bulletin
    2020-2021 BULLETIN His Eminence Cardinal Blase Cupich, S.T.D. Archbishop of Chicago Chancellor Rev. Brendan Lupton, S.T.D. President Table of Contents Introduction……………….…………………………….………… 3 Mission and Objectives…………….……………………………... 3 Degree Programs…………………………….…………………… 5 Baccalaureate in Sacred Theology (S.T.B.)………….……….. 6 Admission Requirements………………………………… 6 Program Requirements………………………………….. 7 S.T.B. Core Curriculum …………………………………. 7 Topics of S.T.B. Exam ..………………………………… 8 Licentiate in Sacred Theology (S.T.L.)……..…..…………… 13 Admission Requirements….…………………………… 13 Length of Program and Residency Requirement……….. 14 Program Requirements………………………………… 15 Licentiate Thesis……………..………………………… 17 Course Descriptions…………………….……………….. 19 Reading List for S.T.L. Exam………….………………… 23 Doctorate in Sacred Theology (S.T.D.)………….....……….… 35 Admission Requirements…………………………………. 35 Program Requirements…………………………………...... 36 Dissertation ………………………………………...…..… 37 General Information Admission Policies and Procedures……...…….………..……… 40 Transfer of Credits ……..………….…………..……………… 40 Academic Integrity…………………………….……....………. 40 Grading System………………………………...……………… 41 Financial Policies …..………………………….….…………… 42 Expenses Not Covered ...………….……………………… 42 Housing on Campus……………..……………….………… 42 Administration and Faculty ……………………………..……… 43 Introduction On September 30, 1929, the Sacred Congregation of Seminaries and Universities (now known as the Congregation for Catholic Education) established a Pontifical Faculty of Theology at the University of Saint Mary of
    [Show full text]
  • Nihilism & Emancipation: Ethics, Politics, & Law Gianni Vattimo
    Nihilism & Emancipation: Ethics, Politics, & Law Gianni Vattimo Foreword by Richard Rorty [ix] Gianni Vattimo is a prominent social democratic politician, a widely read newspaper columnist, and a distinguished philosopher. He was elected in 1999 to the European Parliament, where he has been very active in promoting progressive social legislation and in furthering European unification. For decades, his comments on the political scene in Italy and Europe have appeared in La stampa and other leading Italian newspapers and magazines; he is currently using those media to unleash fierce criticisms of the Berlusconi regime. His philosophical writings, of which this volume provides a rich sample, are among the most imaginative contributions to the tradition of philosophical thought that flows from Nietzsche and Heidegger. These writings are perfectly suited to the needs of those hitherto unfamiliar with this tradition who would like to gain an understanding of the intellectual outlook he calls "nihilism." This way of seeing things might also be called "commonsense Heideggerianism," for it is widespread, and often taken for granted, among European intellectuals. Many philosophers who, like Vattimo and Derrida, were students in the 1950s, were deeply impressed by Heidegger essays such as "Letter on Humanism," "The Question Concerning Technology," "The Origin of the [x] Work of Art" and "Nietzsche's Word: God is Dead." Many of them presuppose, in their own writings, their readers' familiarity with Heidegger's story about the history of Western thought—his account of how the Platonic dream of escaping from Becoming to Being has been dreamt out, and how Nietzsche brought metaphysics to its destined end by inverting Plato, giving Becoming primacy over Being.
    [Show full text]
  • Filip Ivanovic
    C u r r i c u l u m v i t a e FILIP IVANOVIC Address: Ivana Vujosevica 19, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro Phone: +382 69 498 468 E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION PhD (2010-2014) Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology MA (2007-2009, score 110/110 cum laude) Department of Philosophy, University of Bologna BA (2004-2007, score 110/110) Department of Philosophy, University of Bologna APPOINTMENTS 2017-2018 Onassis International Fellow, Norwegian Institute at Athens 2016–2017 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Greek Studies, University of Leuven 2015-2016 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, The Polonsky Academy for Advanced Studies, The Van Leer Institute – Jerusalem 2015-2016 Visiting Researcher, Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2010-2014 Research Fellow, Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Norwegian University of Science and Technology – Trondheim 2010 Fellow, Centre for the Study of Antiquity and Christianity, University of Aarhus LANGUAGES Serbian (native), English (fluent), Italian (fluent), French (fluent), Spanish (reading and good communication skills), Norwegian (basic reading skills), Ancient/Byzantine Greek (reading and research skills), Modern Greek (reading and basic conversation skills) SCHOLARSHIPS AND FELLOWSHIPS 2017-2018 International Postdoctoral Fellowship, Onassis Foundation, Athens 2016–2017 Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, University of Leuven 2015-2016 Polonsky Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, The Van Leer Institute, Jerusalem 2012-2013
    [Show full text]
  • Habermas for Historians Four Approaches to His Works
    FORSCHUNGSBERICHTE FORSCHUNGSBERICHTE Hanco Jürgens Habermas for Historians 5 Four Approaches to his Works Undoubtedly Jürgen Habermas is Germany’s most important living philos- opher. His writings on the public sphere, technology and science, communi- cative action, law and democracy, and the post-secular and the post-national society have influenced generations of scholars in various disciplines. For historians, Habermas’ life, his works, and his polemics are a challenge.1 His broad scope, the topicality of his work, and slight, but noteworthy transi- tions of his ideas – over a period of more than half a century – make it diffi- cult to position the sociologist philosopher in the cultural and intellectual debates of our times. As a philosopher, Habermas changed from a Neo- Marxist critic modern society into a defender of modernity. As a polemist, Habermas has been involved in many public debates, amongst others about nuclear proliferation, the Rote Armee Fraktion, the place of the Holocaust in German history, the German unification, constitutional patriotism, and gene technology. Allthough Habermas has never felt himself a historian, his influence on historiography is considerable. On the one hand, histori- ans very often refer to his early work on the structural transformation of the public sphere, on the other to his leading role in the Historikerstreit. Could this all be brought together into one picture? This article is meant to outline Habermas’ contribution to historiogra- phy by contextualizing his ideas first. To do so, I think we should distinguish four different approaches to his work: within the context of the History of Philosophy, of Critical Theory, of the German intellectual debate after World War II, and finally of a certain discipline, be it sociology, law, eco- nomics, political science, linguistics, or history.
    [Show full text]
  • After Deconstruction
    Differentia: Review of Italian Thought Number 1 Autumn Article 34 1986 After Deconstruction Rodger Friedman Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/differentia Recommended Citation Friedman, Rodger (1986) "After Deconstruction," Differentia: Review of Italian Thought: Vol. 1 , Article 34. Available at: https://commons.library.stonybrook.edu/differentia/vol1/iss1/34 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Academic Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Differentia: Review of Italian Thought by an authorized editor of Academic Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. After Deconstruction by Rodger Friedman Review-essay on Gianni Vattimo and Aldo Rovatti, eds. JI pensierodebole. Milano: Giangiacomo Feltrinelli Editore, 1983. 262pp. Post-structuralist philosophical writing in Italy, as elsewhere, is faced with taking seriously the thesis of "the end of philosophy" sketched earlier this century by Heidegger and continued in the work of Adorno, Benjamin, and on into the French 1970s. The thesis of the end of the parabola of Western philosophy (actually, the end of expository philosophical discourse) was conceived par­ tially in a polemical stance toward Western rational m~taphysics and toward the totalizing, systemic philosophies epitomized in Descartes, in Kant, and (more or less judiciously) in Plato, depend­ ing on the polemic involved. Philosophical writers in Italy find themselves in a position where the polemic has largely served its purpose. The restrictions inherent in the metaphysical undertak­ ing have been disclosed to the extent that further disclosure of the problem would not seem to obtain.
    [Show full text]
  • Hermeneutic Responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the Impetus of Interpretive Engagement
    Duquesne Studies in Phenomenology Volume 1 Issue 1 Hermeneutics Today Article 4 April 2020 Hermeneutic Responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the Impetus of Interpretive Engagement Theodore George Texas A&M University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dsp Recommended Citation George, T. (2020). Hermeneutic Responsibility: Vattimo, Gadamer, and the Impetus of Interpretive Engagement. Duquesne Studies in Phenomenology, 1 (1). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/dsp/vol1/ iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Duquesne Studies in Phenomenology by an authorized editor of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. H ERMENEUTIC R ESPONSIBILITY VATTIMO, GADAMER, AND THE IMPETUS OF INTERPRETIVE ENGAGEMENT THEODORE GEORGE Texas A&M University Few fields of study have drawn more attention to questions of responsibility—moral, social, and political—than contemporary Continental philosophy. In recent writings, Gianni Vattimo has returned to focus on his radical, even revolutionary hermeneutical considerations of responsibility.1 Within this context, his Gifford Lectures and related essays (published as Of Reality: The Purposes of Philosophy) address questions of hermeneutic responsibility elicited by the renewed philosophical interest in realism in our times. For Vattimo, as we shall see, it is our hermeneutical responsibility to resist, even to engage in interpretive conflict against, what he will describe as the “temptation of realism.” Both within the discipline of philosophy and in larger spheres of society and politics, realism is often lauded not only as, say, a metaphysical position but, moreover, as an ideal or even as an attitude.2 ‘Realism’ often stands for belief in the progress of knowledge through research in the sciences, suspicion of intellectual sophistication that obscures the facts, and, accordingly, trust in sound common sense.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF} Theophany : the Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius The
    THEOPHANY : THE NEOPLATONIC PHILOSOPHY OF DIONYSIUS THE AREOPAGITE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Eric D. Perl | 175 pages | 19 Jul 2007 | State University of New York Press | 9780791471111 | English | Albany, NY, United States Theophany : The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite PDF Book He is therefore in some respects a dangerous thinker, yet at the same time a forger of new possibilities:. This is an eye-opening book, and it makes me want to read a great deal more of Dionysius and other Neoplatonic thinkers. And he is immanent in that he is immediately present in all things as their constitutive determinations. Did Dionysius, then, simply transpose the principles of Iamblichean theurgy into his ekklesia? Perl offers clear expositions of the reasoning that underlies Neoplatonic philosophy and explains the argumentation that leads to and supports Neoplatonic doctrines. The consequences of this difference will be discussed later. Wear, S. Celestial worship-corresponding to the purely immaterial theurgy of Iamblichus--was practiced by angels, Dionysius says, not by mortals. Need an account? Did he create a theurgic society, as Rist suggests, in a manner that was more politically successful than anything Iamblichus or other Neoplatonists were able to achieve? Skip to content. I didn't want to read past Plotinus because I didn't like the theurg I've been studying Neoplatonism for about 5 years now. This is equally true in both Plotinus and Proclus. Mirror Sites View this site from another server:. Iamblichus' psychology of the divided soul may well have influenced Dionysius' understanding of material symbols. The first translation, made around by Hilduin, abbot of a monastery near Paris who identified Dionysius not only as St.
    [Show full text]
  • John D. Caputo CURRICULUM VITAE
    John D. Caputo CURRICULUM VITAE EMPLOYMENT: Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Humanities, Syracuse University, 2004– David R. Cook Professor Emeritus of Philosophy, Villanova University, 2004– David R. Cook Professor of Philosophy, Villanova University, 1993-2004 Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, Professor, Villanova University, 1968-2004 Visiting Professor, New School for Social Research, Spring, 1994 Distinguished Adjunct Professor, Fordham University Graduate Program, 1985-88 Visiting Professor, Fordham University, Fall, 1980 Visiting Professor, Duquesne University, Fall, 1978 Instructor, St. Joseph's University (Philadelphia, 1965-68) EDUCATION: Ph.D., 1968, Bryn Mawr College M.A., 1964, Villanova University B.A., 1962, La Salle University AWARDS Winner of the ForeWord Magazine Best Philosophy Book of 2007 award for What Would Jesus Deconstruct? 2008 Loyola Medal (Seattle University), 2007 American Academy of Religion Book Award for Excellence in Studies in Religion, “Constructive-Reflective Studies,” for The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event (Indiana UP, 2007). 2004, Appointed Thomas J. Watson Professor of Religion and Humanities, Syracuse University; David R. Cook Professor Emeritus, Villanova University 1998, Choice Magazine, “Outstanding Academic Book Award” for Deconstruction in a Nutshell (Fordham UP, 1997) 1992, Appointed David R. Cook Professor of Philosophy 1991-92, National Endowment for the Humanities, Fellowship for College Teachers 1989, Phi Beta Kappa, Honorary Member, Villanova Chapter 1985, National Endowment for the Humanities, Summer Stipend 1983-84, American Council of Learned Societies, Fellowship 1982, Outstanding Faculty Scholar Award (V.U.) 1982, Summer Research Grant (V.U.) 1981, Distinguished Alumnus, V.U. Graduate School 1979-80, Phi Kappa Phi Honorary Society, Villanova University Chapter, President 1972, American Council of Learned Societies, Grant-in-aid (Summer grant) OFFICES Member, Book Awards Committee, American Academy of Religion, 2008-2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Rev. John D. Jones, Ph. D. Professor Department of Philosophy Marquette University Special Fields: Compas
    CURRICULUM VITAE Rev. John D. Jones, Ph. D. Professor Department of Philosophy Marquette University Special Fields: Compassion, Eastern Christian Spirituality, Dionysius the Areopagite, Neoplatonism, Philosophy of Poverty Degrees: • A.B., California State University, Long Beach, 1969, Philosophy • Secondary Teaching Credential (Mathematics), California State University, Long Beach, 1970 • M.A., California State University, Long Beach, 1972, Philosophy • Ph.D., Boston College, 1976, Philosophy Academic Experience: • St. Anselm’s College, Assistant Professor, Philosophy, 1976-1977 • Marian College, Assistant Professor, Philosophy, 1977-1978 • Marquette University, Assistant Professor, Philosophy, 1978-1984 • Marquette University, Associate Professor, Philosophy, 1985-1995 • Marquette University, Assistant Chair, Philosophy, 1992-1998 • Marquette University, Professor, Philosophy, 1995- present • Marquette University, Chair, Philosophy, 1998-2004 • Marquette University, Acting Chair, Philosophy, December 2004-August 2005 • Marquette University, Interim Chair, Physics Department, AY 2013-14 • Marquette University, Interim Chair, Philosophy Department, AY 2016-17 • Marquette University, Chair, Philosophy Department, July 2017- December 31, 2018 Clerical Ordination: Ordained to Holy Priesthood of the Orthodox Church in America (May, 2009) PUBLICATIONS: Books in Print Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite: The Divine Names and Mystical Theology. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980. Contains a translation from the Greek, notes, and critical introductory study (pages 1-101). (Selections republished in Walter Kaufmann and Forrest E. Baird (ed.), Medieval Philosophy, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994: 131-136.) Avoiding Nuclear War: The Moral Considerations. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1985 (Marc Griesbach, co-editor). Poverty and the Human Condition. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 1990. Hervaeus Natalis. The Poverty of Christ and the Apostles. Translated from the Latin, with introduction and notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Gianni Vattimo Philosophy As Ontology of Actuality a Biographical-Theoretical Interview with Luca Savarino and Federico Vercellone1
    Gianni Vattimo Philosophy as Ontology of Actuality A biographical-theoretical interview with Luca savarino and Federico Vercellone1 Abstract: The following interview retraces the intellectual development of a leading contemporary thinker, from his early student years to his most recent interventions as a political philosopher, and includes a discussion of some of his most well-known and influential theoretical contributions, such as the notion of “weak thought” and his reflections on postmodernism. Gianni Vattimo presents his philosophy to the reader as an “ontology of actuality” which can only properly be understood in the light of the author’s Christian background and his unwavering interest in social and political questions. Question: In his lecture courses, Heidegger supposedly liked to summarise the life of Aristotle by declaring simply that “Aristotle was born, worked, and died.” It would seem that your philosophy, in contrast, can hardly be under- stood independently of your Christian religious educational background on the one hand, and of your social and political engagement on the other. In your case it appears as if thought and biography effectively reflect one another? Vattimo: When I look back over the past, I realise that my own biography has been very bound up with ideological matters. At the same time, my thought is a reflection of events: in some cases I have simply echoed issues and prob- lems that were part of the general environment around me, part of the air I was breathing every day. Question: Why don’t we begin at the beginning? Vattimo: Well, I graduated from the Liceo Gioberti in 1954.
    [Show full text]