<<

243

S L Asa et al. : not one disease 24:3 C1–C4 Commentary

Pituitary acromegaly: not one disease

Sylvia L Asa1, Walter Kucharczyk2 and Shereen Ezzat3

1Department of Pathology, The Endocrine Oncology Site Group, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 Department of , The Endocrine Oncology Site Group, Princess Margaret Cancer Correspondence Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada should be addressed 3 Department of Medicine, The Endocrine Oncology Site Group, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, to S L Asa University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Email [email protected]

Abstract

Acromegaly has traditionally been regarded as a monomorphous disorder resulting Key Words from a benign . Increasing evidence, however, is highlighting that this ff acromegaly disorder is associated with a spectrum of morphologically distinct pituitary tumors with ff pathology variable clinical, biochemical and radiologic features and differing therapeutic outcomes ff radiology that are attributed to different genetic and epigenetic changes. These data underscore ff biomarkers the need for developing a more refined clinicopathological risk stratification system and ff pituitary tumors implementing personalized targeted therapeutic approaches.

Endocrine-Related Cancer (2017) 24, C1–C4 Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related

We read with interest the recent article ‘T2-weighted MRI this principle to our patient management for several signal predicts and tumor responses to years (Asa & Mete 2016, Bakir et al. 2016) and discuss it analogs in acromegaly’, published in the November 2016 frequently in our multidisciplinary pituitary tumor case issue of Endocrine-Related Cancer (Potorac et al. 2016). The conferences. We have also found that densely granulated authors concluded that ‘The T2-weighted signal intensity corticotroph and lactotroph tumors tend to exhibit low of GH-secreting adenomas at diagnosis correlates with signal on T2-weighted MR imaging (Bakir et al. 2016). hormone reduction and tumor shrinkage in response to This work emphasizes that pituitary tumors associated primary SSA treatment in acromegaly’. with various clinical entities do not represent a single This report confirms the previous work of Hagiwara disorder but rather a group of morphologically and and coworkers (Hagiwara et al. 2003) who reported that functionally distinct entities (Asa 2011). Although most with respect to pituitary somatotroph tumors, low signal clinicians are now aware that rare cases of acromegaly are on T2-weighted MR imaging is almost exclusive to the due to pituitary hyperplasia that represents a response to densely granulated variant, and our data indicating that excess secretion of -releasing hormone hormone and tumor response to somatostatin analogs (GHRH), usually by an extracranial correlate with densely granulated tumor morphology (Sano et al. 1988), many seem to be unaware that primary in acromegaly (Ezzat et al. 1995, Bhayana et al. 2005). pituitary endocrine that cause acromegaly Others have confirmed the predictive value of tumor represent a spectrum of lesions. Some may be hereditary histologic subtyping with respect to somatostatin and when they present in childhood, the manifestations responsiveness (Fougner et al. 2012, Heck et al. 2012, of are distinct (Hannah-Shmouni et al. 2016). Kato et al. 2012, Brzana et al. 2013, Larkin et al. 2013, The vast majority, however, are sporadic and develop Kiseljak-Vassiliades et al. 2015a). We have been applying in adults.

http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0496 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/29/2021 06:45:21AM via free access

10.1530/ERC-16-0496 Commentary S L Asa et al. Acromegaly: not one disease 24:3 C2

Pituitary GH-secreting lesions are divided by harbor the activating GNAS mutations that constitutively histopathological classifications into multiple variants. upregulate cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) Somatotroph neoplasms may be composed of densely or signaling (Spada et al. 1990, Asa et al. 2007, Mayr et al. sparsely granulated somatotrophs based on keratin patterns 2013). In contrast these mutations are usually not found (Asa 2011); the importance of accurate interpretation of in sparsely granulated somatotroph tumors with rare keratin staining patterns was emphasized by Obari and exceptions (Larkin et al. 2013). The molecular alterations coworkers who showed clearly that mixed or intermediate in these more aggressive tumors remain unclear, but seem staining patterns reflect a densely granulated tumor and to involve GH receptor and STAT signaling (Asa et al. only neoplasms with a pure pattern of ‘fibrous body’ 2007, Tateno et al. 2011) that result in the manifestation keratin staining should be classified as sparsely granulated of cytoskeletal dysfunction seen as keratin aggregation somatotroph tumors (Obari et al. 2008). Although into fibrous bodies (Asa & Ezzat 1998, 2002, 2009). sparsely granulated tumors are usually monohormonal, Patients with AIP germline mutations tend to harbor densely granulated somatotroph tumors often produce sparsely granulated tumors (Daly et al. 2010) and sparsely alpha-subunit (Asa 2011). Less frequent plurihormonal granulated somatotroph tumors are overrepresented neoplasms may be composed of mammosomatotrophs among sporadic somatotroph neoplasms with low AIP that synthesize and secrete as well as GH and expression (Denes et al. 2015), suggesting that loss of alpha-subunit and may occasionally co-secrete TSH also AIP may play a role in their development. Although (Asa 2011); these are usually densely granulated and the pathogenesis of poorly differentiated tumors of resemble densely granulated somatotroph tumors. Rarely, Pit-1 lineage is not known, some of these patients were acromegaly may be caused by poorly differentiated tumors members of MEN1 kindreds (Mete et al. 2016). of Pit-1 lineage (Mete et al. 2016). Given the differences in pathogenesis that give There are differences in the clinical presentations rise to distinct clinical, biochemical, radiological of these various neoplasms, and they exhibit different and morphological features of the various tumors behaviors (Asa 2011). In general, densely granulated associated with acromegaly, it is no surprise that their somatotroph and mammosomatotroph tumors tend to be responses to targeted therapies are different. Tumors associated with high levels of GH and IGF-1 and florid that are dependent on cAMP signaling would logically symptomatology (Trouillas et al. 1996, Fougner et al. be responsive to the inhibition of this pathway that is 2012, Heck et al. 2012, Kato et al. 2012, Brzana et al. mediated by somatostatin analogs, especially those that Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related 2013, Larkin et al. 2013, Kiseljak-Vassiliades et al. 2015a); target the somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2). Those perhaps because of this hypersecretory status, they are receptors are highly expressed in most somatotroph occasionally diagnosed as intrasellar tumors that can tumors, but recent studies have suggested that SSTR2 be surgically resected and cured (Asa 2011). In contrast, may be downregulated in the sparsely granulated tumors sparsely granulated somatotroph tumors tend to be (Kato et al. 2012, Brzana et al. 2013, Casar-Borota et al. associated with less obvious clinical symptomatology and 2013, Mayr et al. 2013, Kiseljak-Vassiliades et al. 2015b, more subtle biochemical alterations; they are usually large Iacovazzo et al. 2016). and invasive at diagnosis (Obari et al. 2008, Brzana et al. It should be noted that the same distinctions are 2013, Larkin et al. 2013, Kiseljak-Vassiliades et al. 2015b). even more pronounced in Cushing disease where densely Clinically, mammosomatotroph tumors are associated granulated tumors tend to be small and associated with with hypersecretion of prolactin and/or TSH; interestingly, florid clinical and biochemical features, whereas sparsely patients with pure somatotroph tumors are significantly granulated tumors are often more subtle, and although more likely to present with mellitus or impaired not silent, have been described as ‘whispering’ (Asa tolerance than those with plurihormonal tumors 2011). Mutations in the ubiquitin-specific peptidase (Cheng et al. 2013). Poorly differentiated tumors of Pit-1 USP8 (Ma et al. 2015, Reincke et al. 2015, Hayashi et al. lineage represent an extreme variant that is more likely 2016) have been identified in small tumors that were to be diagnosed when large and more highly invasive almost certainly densely granulated; these mutations (Mete et al. 2016). Although molecular alterations are rare may predict response to the somatostatin analog in pituitary tumors (Asa & Ezzat 1998, 2002, 2009), the (Hayashi et al. 2016). Therefore, our ability densely granulated somatotroph and mammosomatotroph to detect densely granulated tumors in Cushing disease, tumors represent a subset in which there may be a which we have experienced, may also prove to have characteristic genetic alteration; a subset of these tumors therapeutic significance.

http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0496 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/29/2021 06:45:21AM via free access Commentary S L Asa et al. Acromegaly: not one disease 24:3 C3

In the era of precision medicine, it is critical that Asa SL & Mete O 2016 The . In Endocrine Pathology, endocrine oncology maintain its position as a leader in pp 315–397. Eds O Mete & SL Asa. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. understanding the importance of tumor classifications Asa SL, DiGiovanni R, Jiang J, Ward ML, Loesch K, Yamada S, Sano 1, based on pathology and the value of biomarkers that Yoshimoto K, Frank SJ & Ezzat S 2007 A predict appropriate therapeutic responsiveness. In other mutation impairs growth hormone autofeedback signaling in pituitary tumors. Cancer Research 67 7505–7511. (doi:10.1158/0008- tumors, it has become a standard of care to ensure 5472.CAN-07-0219) accurate subclassification before determining therapeutic Bakir B, Chan M, Cruz JP, Kartal MGD, Gulenchyn KY, Kucharczyk W, approaches. One would never consider treating a breast Salmaslioglu A & Yu E 2016 Radiological imaging. In Endocrine Pathology, pp 109–214. Eds O Mete & SL Asa. Cambridge, UK: cancer patient for ‘infiltrating ductal carcinoma’ or a Cambridge University Press. cancer patient for ‘adenocarcinoma’ as we used Bhayana S, Booth GL, Asa SL, Kovacs K & Ezzat S 2005 The implication to 20 years ago; instead, we classify every tumor based of somatotroph adenoma phenotype to somatostatin analog responsiveness in acromegaly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and on the biomarkers that define pathogenesis and predict Metabolism 90 6290–6295. (doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0998) therapeutic efficacy. Similarly in the pituitary, we Brzana J, Yedinak CG, Gultekin SH, Delashaw JB & Fleseriu M 2013 often see a diagnosis of ‘pituitary adenoma’ or perhaps Growth hormone granulation pattern and somatostatin receptor subtype 2A correlate with postoperative somatostatin receptor ligand ‘pituitary adenoma producing GH’. However, in patients response in acromegaly: a large single center experience. Pituitary 16 with acromegaly, the most important immunostain that 490–498. (doi:10.1007/s11102-012-0445-1) pathologists should evaluate is the keratin stain that at Casar-Borota O, Heck A, Schulz S, Nesland JM, Ramm-Pettersen J, Lekva T, Alafuzoff I & Bollerslev J 2013 Expression of SSTR2a, but least allows the distinction of the two most important not of SSTRs 1, 3, or 5 in somatotroph adenomas assessed by subclasses of GH-producing tumors. If this approach monoclonal antibodies was reduced by and correlated identifies abundant and distinct fibrous bodies, instead of with the acute and long-term effects of octreotide. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 98 E1730–E1739. the usual pattern of perinuclear filaments, the diagnosis (doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2145) is more likely to be that of a sparsely granulated tumor Cheng S, Al-Agha R, Araujo PB, Serri O, Asa L & Ezzat S 2013 Metabolic that is typically aggressive and resistant to somatostatin glucose status and pituitary pathology portend therapeutic outcomes in acromegaly. PLoS ONE 8 e73543. (doi:10.1371/journal. analog therapy. pone.0073543) The ability to predict cellular morphology on pre- Daly AF, Tichomirowa MA, Petrossians P, Heliovaara E, Jaffrain-Rea ML, operative imaging adds another dimension to the Barlier A, Naves LA, Ebeling T, Karhu A, Raappana A, et al. 2010 Clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses in patients with complexity of personalized pituitary medicine. Potorac germ-line AIP mutations and pituitary adenomas: an international and coworkers have underscored the value of this little collaborative study. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related known but important structure–function correlation in 95 E373–E383. (doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2556) Denes J, Kasuki L, Trivellin G, Colli LM, Takiya CM, Stiles CE, Barry S, pituitary oncology. de Castro M, Gadelha MR & Korbonits M 2015 Regulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) protein expression by MiR-34a in sporadic somatotropinomas. PLoS ONE 10 e0117107. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117107) Declaration of interest Ezzat S, Kontogeorgos G, Redelmeier DA, Horvath E, Harris AG & The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be Kovacs K 1995 In vivo responsiveness of morphological variants of perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this commentary. growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas to octreotide. European Journal of Endocrinology 133 686–690. (doi:10.1530/ eje.0.1330686) Fougner SL, Casar-Borota O, Heck A, Berg JP & Bollerslev J 2012 Funding Adenoma granulation pattern correlates with clinical variables and This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in effect of somatostatin analogue treatment in a large series of patients the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector. with acromegaly. Clinical Endocrinology 76 96–102. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04163.x) Hagiwara A, Inoue Y, Wakasa K, Haba T, Tashiro T & Miyamoto T 2003 References Comparison of growth hormone-producing and non-growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: imaging characteristics and Asa SL 2011 Tumors of the Pituitary Gland. AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology, pathologic correlation. Radiology 228 533–538. (doi:10.1148/ Series 4, Fascicle 15. Ed SG Silverberg. Silver Spring, MD, USA: ARP radiol.2282020695) Press. Hannah-Shmouni F, Trivellin G & Stratakis CA 2016 Genetics of Asa SL & Ezzat S 1998 The cytogenesis and pathogenesis of pituitary gigantism and acromegaly. Growth Hormone & IGF Research 30–31 adenomas. Endocrine Reviews 19 798–827. (doi:10.1210/er.19.6.798) 37–41. (doi:10.1016/j.ghir.2016.08.002) Asa SL & Ezzat S 2002 The pathogenesis of pituitary tumours. Nature Hayashi K, Inoshita N, Kawaguchi K, Ardisasmita AI, Suzuki H, Reviews Cancer 2 836–849. (doi:10.1038/nrc926) Fukuhara N, Okada M, Nishioka H, Takeuchi Y, Komada M, et al. Asa SL & Ezzat S 2009 The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Annual 2016 The USP8 mutational status may predict drug susceptibility in Review of Pathology 4 97–126. (doi:10.1146/annurev. corticotroph adenomas of Cushing’s disease. European Journal of pathol.4.110807.092259) Endocrinology 174 213–226. (doi:10.1530/eje-15-0689)

http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0496 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/29/2021 06:45:21AM via free access Commentary S L Asa et al. Acromegaly: not one disease 24:3 C4

Heck A, Ringstad G, Fougner SL, Casar-Borota O, Nome T, Ramm- Mete O, Gomez-Hernandez K, Kucharczyk W, Ridout R, Zadeh G, Pettersen J & Bollerslev J 2012 Intensity of pituitary adenoma on Gentili F, Ezzat S & Asa SL 2016 Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenomas T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predicts the response to are not always silent and represent poorly differentiated octreotide treatment in newly diagnosed acromegaly. Clinical monomorphous plurihormonal Pit-1 lineage adenomas. Modern Endocrinology 77 72–78. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04286.x) Pathology 29 131–142. (doi:10.1038/modpathol.2015.151) Iacovazzo D, Carlsen E, Lugli F, Chiloiro S, Piacentini S, Bianchi A, Obari A, Sano T, Ohyama K, Kudo E, Qian ZR, Yoneda A, Rayhan N, Giampietro A, Mormando M, Clear AJ, Doglietto F, et al. 2016 Mustafizur RM & Yamada S 2008 Clinicopathological features of Factors predicting pasireotide responsiveness in somatotroph growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: difference among pituitary adenomas resistant to first-generation somatostatin various types defined by cytokeratin distribution pattern including a analogues: an immunohistochemical study. European Journal of transitional form. Endocrine Pathology 19 82–91. (doi:10.1007/ Endocrinology 174 241–250. (doi:10.1530/EJE-15-0832) s12022-008-9029-z) Kato M, Inoshita N, Sugiyama T, Tani Y, Shichiri M, Sano T, Yamada S & Potorac I, Petrossians P, Daly AF, Alexopoulou O, Borot S, Sahnoun- Hirata Y 2012 Differential expression of genes related to drug Fathallah M, Castinetti F, Devuyst F, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Briet C, et al. responsiveness between sparsely and densely granulated 2016 T2-weighted MRI signal predicts hormone and tumor responses somatotroph adenomas. Endocrine Journal 59 221–228. (doi:10.1507/ to somatostatin analogs in acromegaly. Endocrine-Related Cancer 23 endocrj.EJ11-0177) 871–881. (doi:10.1530/ERC-16-0356) Kiseljak-Vassiliades K, Carlson NE, Borges MT, Kleinschmidt- Reincke M, Sbiera S, Hayakawa A, Theodoropoulou M, Osswald A, DeMasters BK, Lillehei KO, Kerr JM & Wierman ME 2015a Growth Beuschlein F, Meitinger T, Mizuno-Yamasaki E, Kawaguchi K, hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical Saeki Y, et al. 2015 Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 and medical therapy. Endocrine 49 231–241. (doi:10.1007/s12020- cause Cushing"s disease. Nature Genetics 47 31–38. (doi:10.1038/ 014-0383-y) ng.3166) Kiseljak-Vassiliades K, Xu M, Mills TS, Smith EE, Silveira LJ, Lillehei KO, Sano T, Asa SL & Kovacs K 1988 Growth hormone-releasing hormone- Kerr JM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK & Wierman ME 2015b producing tumors: clinical, biochemical, and morphological Differential somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1-5 expression and manifestations. Endocrine Reviews 9 357–373. (doi:10.1210/edrv-9-3- downstream effectors in histologic subtypes of growth hormone 357) pituitary tumors. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 417 73–83. Spada A, Arosio M, Bochicchio D, Bazzoni N, Vallar L, Bassetti M & (doi:10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.016) Faglia G 1990 Clinical, biochemical and morphological correlates Larkin S, Reddy R, Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Wass J & Ansorge O 2013 in patients bearing growth hormone-secreting pituitary tumors Granulation pattern, but not GSP or GHR mutation, is associated with or without constitutively active adenylyl cyclase. Journal of with clinical characteristics in somatostatin-naive patients with Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 71 1421–1426. (doi:10.1210/ somatotroph adenomas. European Journal of Endocrinology 168 jcem-71-6-1421) 491–499. (doi:10.1530/EJE-12-0864) Tateno T, Asa SL, Zheng L, Mayr T, Ullrich A & Ezzat S 2011 The FGFR4- Ma ZY, Song ZJ, Chen JH, Wang YF, Li SQ, Zhou LF, Mao Y, Li YM, G388R polymorphism promotes mitochondrial STAT3 serine Hu RG, Zhang ZY, et al. 2015 Recurrent gain-of-function USP8 phosphorylation to facilitate pituitary growth hormone cell mutations in Cushing’s disease. Cell Research 25 306–317. tumorigenesis. PLoS Genetics 7 e1002400. (doi:10.1371/journal. (doi:10.1038/cr.2015.20) pgen.1002400) Mayr B, Buslei R, Theodoropoulou M, Stalla GK, Buchfelder M & Trouillas J, Sassolas G, Guigard MP, Fonlupt P, Ansaneli-Naves L & Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related Schofl C 2013 Molecular and functional properties of densely and Perrin G 1996 Relationships between pathological diagnosis and sparsely granulated GH-producing pituitary adenomas. European clinical parameters in acromegaly. Metabolism 45 53–56. Journal of Endocrinology 169 391–400. (doi:10.1530/EJE-13-0134) (doi:10.1016/S0026-0495(96)90082-7)

Received in final form 23 January 2017 Accepted 25 January 2017 Accepted Preprint published online 25 January 2017

http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2017 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0496 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/29/2021 06:45:21AM via free access