Annual Report 2017 Learning and Practicing Law
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation
THE FELLOWS OF THE AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION 2015-2016 2015-2016 Fellows Officers: Chair Hon. Cara Lee T. Neville (Ret.) Chair – Elect Michael H. Byowitz Secretary Rew R. Goodenow Immediate Past Chair Kathleen J. Hopkins The Fellows is an honorary organization of attorneys, judges and law professors whose pro- fessional, public and private careers have demonstrated outstanding dedication to the welfare of their communities and to the highest principles of the legal profession. Established in 1955, The Fellows encourage and support the research program of the American Bar Foundation. The American Bar Foundation works to advance justice through ground-breaking, independ- ent research on law, legal institutions, and legal processes. Current research covers meaning- ful topics including legal needs of ordinary Americans and how justice gaps can be filled; the changing nature of legal careers and opportunities for more diversity within the profession; social and political costs of mass incarceration; how juries actually decide cases; the ability of China’s criminal defense lawyers to protect basic legal freedoms; and, how to better prepare for end of life decision-making. With the generous support of those listed on the pages that follow, the American Bar Founda- tion is able to truly impact the very foundation of democracy and the future of our global soci- ety. The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation 750 N. Lake Shore Drive, 4th Floor Chicago, IL 60611-4403 (800) 292-5065 Fax: (312) 564-8910 [email protected] www.americanbarfoundation.org/fellows OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE Rew R. Goodenow, Secretary AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION Parsons Behle & Latimer David A. -
In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center
Fordham Law Review Volume 82 Issue 4 Article 1 2014 In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center Constantine N. Katsoris Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Constantine N. Katsoris, In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 1533 (2014). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol82/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEDICATION IN THE SERVICE OF OTHERS: FROM ROSE HILL TO LINCOLN CENTER Constantine N. Katsoris* At the start of the 2014 to 2015 academic year, Fordham University School of Law will begin classes at a brand new, state-of-the-art building located adjacent to the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts. This new building will be the eighth location for Fordham Law School in New York City. From its start at Rose Hill in the Bronx, New York, to its various locations in downtown Manhattan, and finally, to its two locations at Lincoln Center, the law school’s education and values have remained constant: legal excellence through public service. This Article examines the law school’s rich history in public service through the lives and work of its storied deans, demonstrating how each has lived up to the law school’s motto In the service of others and concludes with a look into Fordham Law School’s future. -
Curriculum Vitae
SIDA LIU 刘思达 劉思達 Department of Sociology, University of Toronto 725 Spadina Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2J4, Canada E-mail: [email protected] http://www.sidaliu.net/ EDUCATION University of Chicago Ph.D., Department of Sociology, 2009 M.A., Department of Sociology, 2004 Peking University LL.B., Law School, 2002 PRESENT POSITIONS 2016-Present. Assistant Professor of Sociology, University of Toronto (Undergraduate campus: Mississauga; Graduate program: St. George) 2016-2017. Member, Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, NJ) 2015-Present. Affiliated Scholar, U.S.-Asia Law Institute, New York University 2012-Present. Faculty Fellow, American Bar Foundation PRIOR POSITIONS 2014-2016. Interim Director, East Asian Legal Studies Center, University of Wisconsin Law School 2010-2013. Research Fellow, Shanghai Jiao Tong University KoGuan Law School 2012. Dean’s Visiting Scholar, Georgetown University Law Center 2009-2016. Assistant Professor of Sociology and Law, University of Wisconsin-Madison 2008-2009. Research Associate, American Bar Foundation 2007-2008. Doctoral Fellow, American Bar Foundation 2006-2007. Visiting Scholar, China University of Political Science and Law 2004-2006. Research Assistant, American Bar Foundation GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS 2016-2018. Public Intellectual Program (PIP) Fellow, National Committee on U.S.-China Relations. 2016-2017. Membership, Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, NJ). 2016. Honorable Mention, Law & Society Association Article Prize. (“Law’s Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law.”) 2014-2018. Research Grant, American Bar Foundation. ($128,910, Co-Principal Investigator with Terence C. Halliday) 2013. Departmental Award for Excellence in Teaching by a Member of the Faculty, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. -
The Authority of International Courts in a Complex World a Book Prospectus
The Authority of International Courts in a Complex World A book prospectus Karen J. Alter, Laurence R. Helfer and Mikael R. Madsen eds. In 2013, iCourts, a Center of Excellence for International Courts, at the University of Copenhagen launched an interdisciplinary study of how political and social contexts shape the authority of international courts (ICs). The result of our efforts is a unique analysis of how different ICs operate in a wide range of contexts. We propose to expand this project into a book, inviting experts on the authority and legitimacy of international institutions to consider the complex reality that our symposium reveals. The initial project, based on two workshops under the editorial leadership of Karen Alter, Larry Helfer and Mikael Madsen, will result in a special edition of the peer-reviewed journal Law and Contemporary Problems, to be published in the summer of 2015. At the first workshop, symposium participants debated how various contextual factors affected the operation of different ICs and identified a common object to study: the “varied authority” of international adjudicators. The editors then developed a framework to conceptualize and measure IC authority and a list of contextual factors that plausibly explain why similarly designed ICs have attained different levels of political and legal influence. A second workshop discussed the framework and nine papers by contributors who applied to the framework to one or more judicial institutions about which they have extensive empirical knowledge. The papers were revised in light of extensive feedback, resulting in a special issue that poses serious questions about the problems, prospects and achievements of ICs around the world. -
Fellows Research Chair in Diversity and Law Is the Crucial Rst Step Toward Building a Vibrant Research Center in Diversity and Law
American Bar Foundation Vision for a Research Center in Diversity and Law SUMMARY: e American Bar Foundation seeks to establish a new Research Center on Diversity and Law to investigate urgent questions surrounding diversity in the legal pro- fession, as well as equal justice and opportunity. e Center will build on the ABF’s position as the preeminent research institute for the empirical study of law. As an essential rst step toward this vision, the Fellows of the American Bar Foundation now seek to establish an en- dowed Research Chair in Diversity and Law through a $1.5 million fundraising campaign. A diverse society needs a diverse legal system. As a matter of DIVERSITY AND LAW justice, we must seek to develop a bar and a judiciary that re ect our society and its varying legal needs. At the same time, the legal ¢ What should law rms do to profession itself needs to attract, develop and retain the most recruit diverse associates ? talented individuals from all backgrounds. ¢ How can companies retain While we have undertaken serious and sustained steps toward building a more diverse legal profession, we recognize a women and attorneys of color continuing gap between the ideal of equal opportunity and in corporate counsel careers? the reality of inequalities along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, disability, and sexual orientation. We have a long way yet to go. ¢ How does diversity in courts, juries, and practice teams a ect e American Bar Foundation (ABF) believes that research has the power to illuminate the way forward. Only through empirical decision-making? research can we assess our progress, explain our successes and failures, and identify promising avenues for advancing our goals ¢ How can we increase the number for a diverse society and a diverse legal profession. -
SIDA LIU 刘 思 达 Department of Sociology University of Wisconsin-Madison 8142 William H
SIDA LIU 刘 思 达 Department of Sociology University of Wisconsin-Madison 8142 William H. Sewell Social Sciences Building 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. Tel: (608) 262-2082 (office); E-mail: [email protected] http://www.sidaliu.net/ EDUCATION University of Chicago Ph.D., Department of Sociology, 2009 A.M., Department of Sociology, 2004 Peking University LL.B., Law School, 2002 PRESENT POSITIONS 2009-Present. Assistant Professor of Sociology and Law, University of Wisconsin-Madison 2012-Present. Faculty Fellow, American Bar Foundation 2015-Present. Affiliated Scholar, US-Asia Law Institute, New York University School of Law PRIOR POSITIONS 2014-2016. Interim Director, East Asian Legal Studies Center, University of Wisconsin Law School 2010-2013. Research Fellow, KoGuan Law School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University 2012. Dean’s Visiting Scholar, Georgetown University Law Center 2008-2009. Research Associate, American Bar Foundation 2007-2008. Doctoral Fellow, American Bar Foundation 2006-2007. Visiting Scholar, China University of Political Science and Law 2004-2006. Research Assistant, American Bar Foundation GRANTS, FELLOWSHIPS AND AWARDS 2016-2017. Membership. Institute for Advanced Study (Princeton, NJ). 2016. Honorable Mention, Law & Society Association Article Prize. (“Law’s Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law.”) 2014-2018. Research Grant, American Bar Foundation. ($128,910, Co-Principal Investigator with Terence C. Halliday) 2013. Departmental Award for Excellence in Teaching by a Member of the Faculty, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2012-2013. Woodrow Wilson Center Fellowship. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. (declined) 2010-2011. Research Grant. The Graduate School, University of Wisconsin-Madison. -
The American Bar Foundation Welcomes the 2021 Summer Undergraduate Research Fellows
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Debby Hernandez E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 312.988.6546 Fax: 312.988.6579 Online: americanbarfoundation.org Facebook: American Bar Foundation Twitter: @ABFResearch The American Bar Foundation Welcomes the 2021 Summer Undergraduate Research Fellows CHICAGO, June 02, 2021- The American Bar Foundation (ABF) has chosen five exceptional undergraduate students to take part in the 2021 Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program (SURF). The students were selected among a highly competitive group of applicants for their excellent work throughout their current undergraduate careers. The 2021 Fellows are Natasha Chaiyarat, Laura Fagbemi, Connor Herbert, Nicole Maria Mateo, and Sasha Matsuki. Also known as the Montgomery Summer Research Diversity Fellowship Program, the SURF program offers undergraduate students from underrepresented groups a hands- on learning experience in the field of law and social science research. Over the course of eight weeks, each fellow works closely with an ABF Research Professor as a research assistant, affording them the opportunity to be mentored by and take part in sociolegal research with experienced scholars. Fellows also learn about other empirical and interdisciplinary sociolegal research by joining ABF faculty, program alumni, and legal professionals in a series of seminars and forums. Due to the ongoing pandemic, the 2021 program will once again be virtual this year. The SURF program is generously supported by the Kenneth & Harle Montgomery Foundation, the Law School Admissions Council (LSAC), Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, Banner Witcoff, Solon E. Summerfield Foundation, and AT&T. “We are pleased to introduce our next group of outstanding undergraduate fellows to the ABF community,” said Ajay K. -
Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989
Sarah Lawrence College DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence Women's History Theses Women’s History Graduate Program 5-2019 Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989 Katherine Swartwood Sarah Lawrence College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd Part of the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Swartwood, Katherine, "Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989" (2019). Women's History Theses. 44. https://digitalcommons.slc.edu/womenshistory_etd/44 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Women’s History Graduate Program at DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. It has been accepted for inclusion in Women's History Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SarahLawrence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Please Pull My Nightgown Down When You Are Through: Marital Rape Activism, Opposition, and Law, 1974-1989 Katherine Swartwood Submitted in partial completion of the Master of Arts Degree at Sarah Lawrence College May 2019 Swartwood 1 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my graduating Sarah Lawrence College Women’s History cohort for helping me develop my project over the last two years: Cristina Tanzola, Caitlin O’Keefe, Katya Duncan, Fareeha Rashid, T.C. Mann, and Cara Schooley, as well as other Women’s History students, Kat Sturgill and Marian Phillips. I also want to thank the faculty that made this thesis possible. To my thesis advisor, Nadeen Thomas and the director of the Women’s History Program, Mary Dillard, along with Visions/Revisions professor, Lyde Sizer for helping shape my thesis from its origins. -
Remarks of Dean Richard L. Revesz at the Memorial Service for Dean Emeritus Norman Redlich June 13, 2011
Remarks of Dean Richard L. Revesz at the Memorial Service for Dean Emeritus Norman Redlich June 13, 2011 Introduction Norman Redlich (LL.M. ’55) was my family’s dean. He was the dean who hired me in 1985 to join the NYU Law School faculty and during whose tenure I served for three years as a very junior faculty member. And for the last 9 years, I’ve been occupying an office that for years I had referred to as “Norman’s office.” Norman was also the dean when my wife Vicki Been ’83 was a law student. He was the dean who called her to his office to let her know in a stern but caring way that during her clerkship with Judge Edward Weinfeld ’21, perhaps the Law School’s most illustrious alumnus at the time, she would need to uphold the Law School’s reputation and honor. Law School Career Norman was an extraordinary dean. Much of the Law School’s current success can be traced to Norman’s visionary leadership. Norman served in the military during World War II. Then, after graduating from Williams College in 1947 and receiving his LL.B. from Yale Law School in 1950, Norman earned his LL.M. in taxation from NYU School of Law in 1955. He joined our faculty in 1960, received tenure in 1962, and became the Judge Edward Weinfeld Professor of Law in 1983. Norman was a prolific scholar in the areas of constitutional law and professional responsibility, and authored an influential casebook in each of these areas. -
Lee Harvey Oswald, Life-History, and the Truth of Crime
Ghosts of the Disciplinary Machine: Lee Harvey Oswald, Life-History, and the Truth of Crime Jonathan Simon* It seems to me important, very important, to the record that we face the fact that this man was not only human but a rather ordinary one in many respects, and who appeared ordinary. If we think that this was a man such as we might never meet, a great aberration from the normal, someone who would stand out in a crowd as unusual, then we don't know this man, we have no means of recognizing such a person again in advance of a crime such as he committed. The important thing, I feel, and the only protection we have is to realize how human he was though he added to it this sudden and great violence beyond- Ruth Paine' I. INTRODUCTION: EARL WARREN'S HAUNTED HOUSE Thirty-four years ago, the President's Commission on the Assas- sination of President Kennedy, popularly known as the Warren Commission, published its famous report. The Commission's most * Professor of Law, University of Miami; Visiting Professor of Law, Yale Law School. I would like to thank the following for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper Anthony Alfieri, Kristin Bumiller, Marianne Constable, Rosemary J. Coombe, Thomas Dumm, John Hart Ely, Patrick Gudridge, Christine Harrington, Austin Sarat, Adam Simon, and especially Mark Weiner for exceptional editorial assistance. All errors of fact or judgment belong to the author. I would also like to thank the University of Miami School of Law for providing summer research support. -
The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo
Oregon Law Review Winter 2000 - Volume 79, Number 4 (Cite as: 79 Or. L. Rev. 1033) DAN SIMON* The Double-Consciousness of Judging: The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo Copyright © 2000, University of Oregon; Dan Simon INTRODUCTION There is a growing awareness in legal scholarship that a crisis of sorts pervades the legal field. In the now famous The Lost Lawyer, Dean Anthony Kronman has identified an adverse transformation of the character of the legal profession. n1 Professor Mary Anne Glendon has put forth a critique of the rights-based rhetoric that predominates legal discourse. n2 Professor Steven Smith has both broadened and deepened these discouraging observations by suggesting that the legal community is suffering from a crisis of faith. As Smith astutely points out, there is a fundamental problem with the integrity of legal discourse in that legal actors operate in a state of discordance between their beliefs and practices. Participants in this discourse have come to take for granted that the reasons they present in support of their positions are quite distinct from the "real reasons" that underlie [*1034] them. n3 Smith coined this duplicity a "schizophrenic condition," suggesting that it is a "sign of something deeply wrong in modern legal thought." n4 This paper explores the possibility that judicial reasoning might be one of the causes of this state of duplicity. This proposition is explored through an analysis of the work of Benjamin Nathan Cardozo, an exemplary and distinguished inhabitant of the American judicial pantheon. I will briefly review recent scholarship that champions his legacy as the product of renaissance-like qualities: encompassing brilliant judicial performance and insightful writing about judging. -
FOSTERING the Rule of Law President’S Message
2018 ANNUAL REPORT FOSTERING THE Rule OF Law President’s Message The year 2018 was one of transition for the New York Bar Foundation as the three-year tenure of John Gross, immediate past president, came to successful conclusion with a dramatic increase in the resources and visibility of the foundation; a new president of the board of directors, Lesley Rosenthal, was welcomed; and an exciting new strategic plan was adopted, with a theme of fostering the rule of law. The New York Bar Foundation improves access to justice and enhances public understand- ing of the law all around the state. In 2018 we provided more than $700,000 in seed grants to innovative legal projects helping those in need. Recently, our grants have: • Helped a disabled veteran in Syracuse launch a new small business, • Resettled a Syrian refugee family in the Buffalo area, • Assisted a teenager from Geneva, NY, with school attendance problems related to mental illness, get the EAP she needed to continue her education, • Aided a Brooklyn grandmother in restructuring her mortgage to avoid foreclosure and homelessness for herself and the grandchildren she’s raising. In partnership with the sections of the New York State Bar Association and the Chief Judge of the State of New York, we also fund scholar- ships for worthy up-and-coming law students, including those from underprivileged or diverse backgrounds, and those who are committed to public interest work. Beyond our regular activities, we also respond with urgency to crises in the moment, raising and distributing money to assist with legal needs such as restoring housing and benefits to those hit by a hurricane or providing representation to migrant children separated from their parents.