DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1802.07403V3 [Math.AG] 15 Jun 2020 Udeo Rank of Bundle and Theorem Theorem Have: We Then Theorem Iesosadabtaycaatrsi L,Tm .] Ntecs O Case the in 0.1]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1802.07403V3 [Math.AG] 15 Jun 2020 Udeo Rank of Bundle and Theorem Theorem Have: We Then Theorem Iesosadabtaycaatrsi L,Tm .] Ntecs O Case the in 0.1] STABILITY CONDITIONS FOR RESTRICTIONS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SURFACES JOHN KOPPER Abstract. Using Bridgeland stability conditions, we give sufficient criteria for a stable vector bundle on a smooth complex projective surface to remain stable when restricted to a curve. We give a stronger criterion when the vector bundle is a general vector bundle on the plane. As an application, we compute the cohomology of such bundles for curves that lie in the plane or on Hirzebruch surfaces. 1. Introduction In this paper we give sufficient criteria for a stable bundle on a smooth complex projective surface to remain stable when restricted to a curve. The main results in this subject are due to Flenner [Fl] and Mehta- Ramanathan [MR] who give criteria for restrictions of bundles to remain stable on divisors and complete intersections. In the case of a surface, Flenner’s theorem becomes: Theorem (Flenner). Let (X,H) be a smooth polarized surface. If E is a µH -semistable bundle of rank r on X and C X is a general curve of class dH, then E C is semistable if ⊂ | d +1 r2 1 >H2 max − , 1 . 2 4 Bogomolov gave a more precise restriction theorem for surfaces [Bo] (see also [HL]). Notably, Bogomolov’s result applies to any smooth curve moving in an ample class. For a vector bundle E, let 1 c (E)2 ch (E) ∆(E)= 1 2 . 2 · r2 − r Then we have: Theorem (Bogomolov). Let (X,H) be a smooth polarized surface. If E is µH -stable bundle of rank r on X and C X is a smooth curve of class dH, then E C is stable if ⊂ | r r 2 2d> − r∆(E)+1, r r 1 2 2 − Langer recently gave a very strong restriction theorem which holds for very ample divisors in higher dimensions and arbitrary characteristic [L2, Thm. 0.1]. In the case of a surface in characteristic zero, arXiv:1802.07403v3 [math.AG] 15 Jun 2020 Langer’s theorem becomes: Theorem (Langer). Let X be a smooth surface and H a very ample divisor on X. If E is a µH -semistable bundle of rank r 2 and C X a general curve of class dH, then E C is semistable if ≥ ⊂ | (d + 1)(d + 2) r2 1 > max − , 1 H2 +1 r2∆(E)+1. 2 4 More recent developments in stability conditions for derived categories have led to new results in the study of restrictions of bundles on surfaces. For example, Feyzbakhsh [F1] used the machinery of stability conditions developed by Bridgeland [Br1] [Br2] to give an effective criterion to guarantee the stability of restrictions of bundles on K3 surfaces. We follow the method of Feyzbakhsh to give a restriction theorem for all surfaces. When the surface is the projective plane, we give a much stronger stability criterion. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 14J60, 14H60. Secondary: 14H50, 14D20. Key words and phrases. Moduli spaces of sheaves, stable vector bundles, restrictions of vector bundles. During the preparation of this article the author was partially supported by NSF RTG grant DMS-1246844. 1 2 J. KOPPER A notable difference between our first result and Langer’s theorem is that we are able to replace the requirement that C be ample with a weaker condition on the positivity of C. An application of this improve- ment is suggested by Proposition 3.10 in which we construct a (rational) map between moduli spaces: given a smooth polarized surface (X,H) and curve C X, under the conditions of Theorem 3.3, the restriction ⊂ map defines a morphism from the space of µH -stable sheaves on X to the space of stable sheaves on C. The precise statements of the main theorems are as follows: Theorem (3.3). Suppose (X,H) is a smooth polarized surface, C an integral curve on X, and E a µH -stable vector bundle of rank r 2 on X. Then E C is stable if ≥ | C2 1 > r(r 1)∆(E)+ . 2H C − 2r(r 1)H2 · − Remark 1.1. During the preparation of this paper, S. Feyzbaksh pointed out that the proof of Theorem 3.3 relies only on the notion of tilt stability and a direct generalization therefore holds when restricting stable bundles to divisors on higher dimensional varieties. A proof of this fact in the case the divisor moves in the same ample class as the polarization can be found in Feyzbakhsh’s thesis [F2]. The author wants to thank S. Feyzbakhsh for her thoughtful conversations. In the special case that X is the plane and E is general in moduli, we obtain a much stronger bound for the degree of C that does not grow with the rank of E. Theorem (3.9). Suppose C P2 is a degree d integral curve and E is a general slope stable vector bundle 2 ⊂ on P with Chern character v such that ∆(v) 4. Then E C is stable if ≥ | d> 5 + 8∆(E)+5. Following Feyzbakhsh [F1], we prove both theoremsp using stability conditions for surfaces as constructed by Bridgeland [Br2], Arcara-Bertram [AB], and Toda [T]. If E is a slope stable sheaf on a surface X and i : C ֒ X a curve, then E and i E C fit into a distinguished triangle → ∗ | E i E C E( C)[1] E[1] → ∗ | → − → in the derived category b(X), where E( C)[1] denotes the complex associated to E( C) with the grading D − − shifted by one. If E and E( C)[1] are stable of the same phase, then i E C is semistable. We will show − ∗ | that in these circumstances E C is a slope semistable sheaf on C (Lemma 2.6). By slightly perturbing the | stability condition, we will show that E C is in fact stable (Lemma 2.7). The main content of the argument is producing| sufficient criteria to ensure that the conditions of Lemmas 2.6 and 2.7 hold. Specifically, we need E and E( C)[1] to be stable of the same phase. For a fixed Chern character v, there is a wall-and-chamber decomposition− of the stability manifold parametrizing stability conditions such that stable objects with Chern character v can only be destabilized when a wall is crossed [Br1]. To prove Theorem 3.3, we estimate the Gieseker wall, a wall in the stability manifold bounding the chamber consisting of stability conditions σ for which the only σ-semistable objects of Chern character v are the Gieseker semistable sheaves. Similarly, to prove Theorem 3.9 we estimate the effective wall for sheaves on P2. The effective wall bounds the chamber in which the general Gieseker semistable sheaf E is σ-semistable. The Giesker wall was computed explicitly in [CH1] and the effective wall for sheaves on P2 was computed in [CHW]. We expect the techniques used in proving Theorem 3.9 to generalize to any surface for which the effective wall is known. Structure of this paper. In Section 2 we recall necessary facts about stable sheaves and stability conditions for surfaces. In Section 3 we prove our restriction theorems. We conclude in Section 4 by giving some applications of restriction theorems to Brill-Noether problems for curves in the plane and on Hirzebruch surfaces. Acknowledgments. The author is grateful to Izzet Coskun, Takumi Murayama, Tim Ryan, and Matthew Woolf for their helpful feedback and input. The author is also grateful to the anonymous referees for their thoughtful responses. 2. Preliminaries In this section we will review facts about stable sheaves and stability conditions that will be used through- out the paper. All schemes are defined over the field of complex numbers. STABILITY CONDITIONS FOR RESTRICTIONS OF VECTOR BUNDLES ON PROJECTIVE SURFACES 3 2.1. Moduli of stable sheaves. For more details on moduli spaces of sheaves, we refer the reader to [HL]. Let (X,H) be a polarized variety and E a coherent sheaf on X of pure dimension d = dim(X). Then we may write d mi P (E,m)= χ(E X (m)) = αi(E) ⊗ O i! i=0 X for unique integers αi(E). The degree deg(E) is defined as the number αd−1(E) r αd−1( X ). If X is d−1 − · O smooth or an integral curve, then deg(E)= c1(E) H by Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch [H, Ex. IV.1.9]. The reduced Hilbert polynomial of E is defined as· p(E,m) p(E,m)= . αd(E) We say that E is Gieseker semistable if for all proper subsheaves F E we have p(F,m) p(E,m) for m 0. We say E is Gieseker stable if strict inequality holds. ⊂ ≤ ≫ If E has rank r> 0, then we define the µH -slope of E to be the number deg(E) µ (E)= . H rHd We say that a torsion-free sheaf E is µH -semistable (or slope semistable) if µH (F ) µH (E) for all proper ≤ subsheaves F of rank strictly less than r. The sheaf E is said to be µH -stable (or slope stable) if strict inequality holds. Note that the notions of slope stability and Gieseker stability both depend on the choice of ample divisor H. d 1 Write c(E)=1+ c1(E)+ c2(E)+ cd(E)= i=1(1 + γi(E)), with γi(E) A (X) for all i. Then the Chern character of E is the polynomial··· ∈ Q d 1 2 ch(E)= exp(γi) = rk(E)+ c (E)+ (c (E) 2c (E)) + . 1 2 1 − 2 ··· i=1 X The degree n term of ch(E) is denoted chn(E).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Global Geometry of the Moduli Space of Curves
    Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics The global geometry of the moduli space of curves Gavril Farkas 1. Introduction ABSTRACT. We survey the progress made in the last decade in understanding the birational geometry of the moduli space of stable curves. Topics that are being discusses include the cones of ample and effective divisors, Kodaira dimension and minimal models of Mg. For a complex projective variety X, one way of understanding its birational geometry is by describing its cones of ample and effective divisors 1 1 Ample(X) ⊂ Eff(X) ⊂ N (X)R. 1 The closure in N (X)R of Ample(X) is the cone Nef(X) of numerically effective 1 divisors, i.e. the set of all classes e ∈ N (X)R such that C · e ≥ 0 for all curves C ⊂ X. The interior of the closure Eff(X) is the cone of big divisors on X. Loosely speaking, one can think of the nef cone as parametrizing regular contractions 2 from X to other projective varieties, whereas the effective cone accounts for rational contractions of X. For arbitrary varieties of dimension ≥ 3 there is little connection between Nef(X) and Eff(X) (for surfaces there is Zariski decomposition which provides a unique way of writing an effective divisor as a combination of a nef and a ”negative” part and this relates the two cones, see e.g. [L1]). Most questions in higher dimensional geometry can be phrased in terms of the ample and effective cones. For instance, a smooth projective variety X is of general type precisely when KX ∈ int(Eff(X)).
    [Show full text]
  • Exact Sequences of Stable Vector Bundles on Nodal Curves
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 27 (1998), 159-165 EXACT SEQUENCES OF STABLE VECTOR BUNDLES ON NODAL CURVES E . B a l l i c o (Received April 1997) Abstract. Let X be an integral projective curve with g pa(X) > 3 and with only nodes as singularities. Fix integers r, s, a, with b r > 0, s > 0 and a/r < b/s. Here (using the corresponding result proven recently by Brambila- Paz and Lange) we prove the existence of stable vector bundlesA, E, onB X with rank(A) = r, deg(A) = a, rank(B) = s, deg(B) = b, A subbundle of E and E/A — B. Then we study several properties of maximal degree subbundles of stable bundles on X. 1. Introduction Let X be an integral projective curve of arithmetic genusg := pa{X) > 3 with only nodes as singularities. We work over an algebraically closed base fieldK with ch&r(K) = 0. In this paper we want to construct “suitable” stable bundles onX. To prove (as in [10] and [4] for smooth curves) the existence of suitable families of stable bundles on X it is important to solve the following question. Fix integers r, s, a, b with r > 0, s > 0 and a/r < b/s. Is there an exact sequence 0^ A-* E ^ B ^ 0 (1) of stable vector bundles on X with rank(A) = r, rank(B) = s, deg(A) = a and deg(£?) = s? An affirmative answer to this question was found in [4] when X is smooth. The main aim of this paper is to show that this question has an affirmative answer for nodal X and prove the following result.
    [Show full text]
  • VECTOR BUNDLES OVER a REAL ELLIPTIC CURVE 3 Admit a Canonical Real Structure If K Is Even and a Canonical Quaternionic Structure If K Is Odd
    VECTOR BUNDLES OVER A REAL ELLIPTIC CURVE INDRANIL BISWAS AND FLORENT SCHAFFHAUSER Abstract. Given a geometrically irreducible smooth projective curve of genus 1 defined over the field of real numbers, and a pair of integers r and d, we deter- mine the isomorphism class of the moduli space of semi-stable vector bundles of rank r and degree d on the curve. When r and d are coprime, we describe the topology of the real locus and give a modular interpretation of its points. We also study, for arbitrary rank and degree, the moduli space of indecom- posable vector bundles of rank r and degree d, and determine its isomorphism class as a real algebraic variety. Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Notation 1 1.2. The case of genus zero 2 1.3. Description of the results 3 2. Moduli spaces of semi-stable vector bundles over an elliptic curve 5 2.1. Real elliptic curves and their Picard varieties 5 2.2. Semi-stable vector bundles 6 2.3. The real structure of the moduli space 8 2.4. Topologyofthesetofrealpointsinthecoprimecase 10 2.5. Real vector bundles of fixed determinant 12 3. Indecomposable vector bundles 13 3.1. Indecomposable vector bundles over a complex elliptic curve 13 3.2. Relation to semi-stable and stable bundles 14 3.3. Indecomposable vector bundles over a real elliptic curve 15 References 17 arXiv:1410.6845v2 [math.AG] 8 Jan 2016 1. Introduction 1.1. Notation. In this paper, a real elliptic curve will be a triple (X, x0, σ) where (X, x0) is a complex elliptic curve (i.e., a compact connected Riemann surface of genus 1 with a marked point x0) and σ : X −→ X is an anti-holomorphic involution (also called a real structure).
    [Show full text]
  • Mochizuki's Crys-Stable Bundles
    i i i i Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 43 (2007), 95–119 Mochizuki’s Crys-Stable Bundles: A Lexicon and Applications By Brian Osserman∗ Abstract Mochizuki’s work on torally crys-stable bundles [18] has extensive implications for the theory of logarithmic connections on vector bundles of rank 2 on curves, once the language is translated appropriately. We describe how to carry out this transla- tion, and give two classes of applications: first, one can conclude almost immediately certain results classifying Frobenius-unstable vector bundles on curves; and second, it follows from the results of [22] that one also obtains results on rational functions with prescribed ramification in positive characteristic. §1. Introduction Mochizuki’s theory of torally crys-stable bundles and torally indigenous bundles developed in [18] has, after appropriate translation, immediate impli- cations for logarithmic connections on vector bundles of rank 2 on curves. This in turn has immediate implications to a subject which has recently been studied by a number of different people (see, for instance, [15], [14], [8], [20]): Frobenius- unstable vector bundles, and by extension the generalized Verschiebung rational map induced on moduli spaces of vector bundles by pulling back under Frobe- nius. Furthermore, together with the results of [22], one can use Mochizuki’s work to describe rational functions with prescribed ramification in positive char- acteristic. This relationship provided the original motivation for the ultimately Communicated by S. Mochizuki. Received October 14, 2004. Revised April 5, 2005, September 8, 2005. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification(s): 14H60. This paper was supported by a fellowship from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/9902145V1 [Math.AG] 25 Feb 1999 by Oprto Ntaie(Otatn.C1-T303) Ohau Both CI1*-CT93-0031)
    To appear in Journal f¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik RESTRICTION OF THE POINCARE´ BUNDLE TO A CALABI-YAU HYPERSURFACE INDRANIL BISWAS AND L. BRAMBILA-PAZ 1. Introduction Let X be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus g, where g ≥ 3. Denote by Mξ := M(n, ξ) the moduli space of stable vector bundles over X of rank n and fixed determinant ξ. If the degree deg(ξ) and the rank n are coprime, then there is a universal family of vector bundles, U, over X parametrized by Mξ. This family is unique up to tensoring by a line bundle that comes from Mξ. We fix one universal family over X ×Mξ and call it the Poincar´ebundle. For any x ∈ X, let Ux denote the vector bundle over Mξ obtained by restricting U to x ×Mξ. It is known that U (see [BBN]) and Ux (see [NR] and [Ty]) are stable vector bundles with respect to any polarization on X ×Mξ and Mξ respectively. A smooth anti-canonical divisor D on Mξ is an example of a Calabi-Yau variety, i.e., it is connected and simply connected with trivial canonical line bundle. The Calabi-Yau varieties are of interest both in string theory and in algebraic geometry. In this paper we consider the restrictions of U and Ux to X×D and x×D respectively, where x ∈ X and D is a smooth anti-canonical divisor. Denote such restrictions by UD and (UD)x respectively. In Theorem 2.5 and Corollary 2.6 we prove the following : If n ≥ 3, then the vector bundle (UD)x is stable with respect to any polarization on D.
    [Show full text]
  • Report No. 26/2008
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Report No. 26/2008 Classical Algebraic Geometry Organised by David Eisenbud, Berkeley Joe Harris, Harvard Frank-Olaf Schreyer, Saarbr¨ucken Ravi Vakil, Stanford June 8th – June 14th, 2008 Abstract. Algebraic geometry studies properties of specific algebraic vari- eties, on the one hand, and moduli spaces of all varieties of fixed topological type on the other hand. Of special importance is the moduli space of curves, whose properties are subject of ongoing research. The rationality versus general type question of these spaces is of classical and also very modern interest with recent progress presented in the conference. Certain different birational models of the moduli space of curves have an interpretation as moduli spaces of singular curves. The moduli spaces in a more general set- ting are algebraic stacks. In the conference we learned about a surprisingly simple characterization under which circumstances a stack can be regarded as a scheme. For specific varieties a wide range of questions was addressed, such as normal generation and regularity of ideal sheaves, generalized inequalities of Castelnuovo-de Franchis type, tropical mirror symmetry constructions for Calabi-Yau manifolds, Riemann-Roch theorems for Gromov-Witten theory in the virtual setting, cone of effective cycles and the Hodge conjecture, Frobe- nius splitting, ampleness criteria on holomorphic symplectic manifolds, and more. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 14xx. Introduction by the Organisers The Workshop on Classical Algebraic Geometry, organized by David Eisenbud (Berkeley), Joe Harris (Harvard), Frank-Olaf Schreyer (Saarbr¨ucken) and Ravi Vakil (Stanford), was held June 8th to June 14th. It was attended by about 45 participants from USA, Canada, Japan, Norway, Sweden, UK, Italy, France and Germany, among of them a large number of strong young mathematicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Results on Vector Bundles, Principal Bundles and Related Topics1
    Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 50(3): 635-664, September 2019 °c Indian National Science Academy DOI: 10.1007/s13226-019-0347-2 RECENT RESULTS ON VECTOR BUNDLES, PRINCIPAL BUNDLES AND RELATED TOPICS1 Usha N. Bhosle Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India e-mail: [email protected] This is a short survey of the interesting work in the theory of vector bundles (with various aug- menting structures), principal bundles and related topics by Indian mathematicians in the last decade. The focus is on topics in which Indian mathematicians have made major contributions. Key words : Vector bundles; moduli spaces; principal bundles. 1. INTRODUCTION The theory of vector bundles and more generally principal bundles has strong ties with Physics (Con- formal field theory, String theory) and has connection with many other branches of mathematics including Number theory, Topology, Representation theory. It is one of the most studied branches of Algebraic geometry. This is an attempt to give a short survey of the interesting work in the theory of vector bundles (with various augmenting structures), principal bundles and related topics by Indian mathematicians in the last decade. It is impossible to describe in detail their vast contributions in a few pages, so this has been a steep task. I have mainly chosen topics in which Indian mathematicians have made major contributions. 2. HIGGS BUNDLES In the last three decades, the theory of Hitchin pairs (or Higgs bundles) on a smooth curve has grown in leaps and bounds, there have been generalisations to Higgs G-bundles and Higgs bundles on higher dimensional varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Moduli of Π-Vector Bundles Over an Algebraic Curve
    Moduli of p-Vector Bundles over an Algebraic Curve C. S. Seshadri 1 Introduction Let X be a smooth algebraic curve, proper over the field C of complex numbers (or equivalently a compact Riemann surface) and of genus g: Let J be the Jacobian of X; it is a group variety of dimension g and its underlying set of points is the set of divisor classes (or equivalently isomorphic classes of line bundles) of degree zero. It is a classical result that the underlying topological space of J can be identified with the set of (unitary) characters of the fundamental group p1(X) into C (i.e. homomorphisms of p1(X) into complex numbers of modulus one) and therefore J = S1 × ··· × S1; g times, as a topological manifold, S1 being the unit circle in the complex plane. The purpose of these lectures is to show how this result can be ex- tended to the case of unitary representations of arbitrary rank for Fuch- sian groups with compact quotients. Given a representation r:p1(X) ! GL(n; C), one can associate to r in a natural manner (as will be done formally later) a vector bundle (algebraic or holomorphic) on X; let us call such a vector bundle unitary if r is a unitary representation. 1 This is essentially a reproduction of the paper with the same title that appeared as a part of the proceedings of a conference held in Italy in September 1969 (Questions on Algebraic Varieties C.I.M.E., III Ciclo, Varenna, 1969). Many typographical mistakes as well as a math- ematical error (pointed out by V.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Vector Bundles on Curves: Numerical Invariants of Their Extremal Subbundles
    MATH. SCAND. 89 (2001), 46–56 STABLE VECTOR BUNDLES ON CURVES: NUMERICAL INVARIANTS OF THEIR EXTREMAL SUBBUNDLES E. BALLICO Abstract Let X be a smooth projective curve of genus g ≥ 2 and E a rank r vector bundle on X.If1≤ t<r set st (E) := sup{t(deg(E)) − r(deg(F )), where F is a rank t subsheaf of E}. Here we construct rank r stable vector bundles E on X such that the sequence {st (E)}1≤t<r has a prescribed value and the set of all subsheaves of E with maximal degree may be explicitely described. Introduction Let X be a smooth projective curve of genus g ≥ 2 and E a rank r vector bundle on X. For every integer t with 1 ≤ t<r, set st (E) := sup{t(deg(E)) − r(deg(F )), where F is a rank t subsheaf of E}. These integers are usually called the Lange invariants of E, since their use in [6]. They are important invariants of a stable vector bundle and give a stratification of the moduli scheme M(X; r, d) of all rank r stable vector bundles on X with degree d (see [6] and [4]). The affermative solution of the so-called Lange conjecture proved in [10] or [3] or, under certain assumptions on r and g, in [4], shows that all these strata, for fixed t, are non-empty (at least in characteristic 0). However, there should be further constraints on the orderered set of r − 1 integers (s1(E),...,sr−1(E)) for E ∈ M(X; r, d).
    [Show full text]
  • Holonomy Groups of Stable Vector Bundles
    Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 44 (2008), 183–211 Holonomy Groups of Stable Vector Bundles By V. Balaji∗ and J´anos Kollar´ ∗∗ Abstract We define the notion of holonomy group for a stable vector bundle F on a variety in terms of the Narasimhan–Seshadri unitary representation of its restriction to curves. Next we relate the holonomy group to the minimal structure group and to the decomposition of tensor powers of F . Finally we illustrate the principle that either the holonomy is large or there is a clear geometric reason why it should be small. Let M be a Riemannian manifold and E a vector bundle with a connection ∇. Parallel transport along loops gives a representation of the loop group of M with base point x into the orthogonal group O(Ex) of the fiber at x (see, for instance, [KN96], [Bry00]). If X is a complex manifold and E a holomorphic vector bundle, then usually there are no holomorphic connections on E. One can, nonetheless, define a close analog of the holonomy representation in the complex setting if E is a stable vector bundle and X is projective algebraic. By Mehta–Ramanathan [MR82], if x ∈ C ⊂ X is a sufficiently general complex curve, then E|C is also stable and so, by a result of Narasimhan- Seshadri [NS65], it corresponds to a unique unitary representation ρ : π1(C) → U(Ex)ifc1(E|C)=0.Ifc1(E|C ) = 0, one gets a special type of unitary representation ρ : π1(C \ x) → U(Ex), see (12). We call these the Narasimhan– Seshadri representation of E|C .
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Vector Bundles on Algebraic Surfaces Ii
    F. Takemoto Nagoya Math. J. Vol. 52 (1973), 173-195 STABLE VECTOR BUNDLES ON ALGEBRAIC SURFACES II FUMIO TAKEMOTO This paper is a continuation of "Stable vector bundles on algebraic surfaces" [10]. For simplicity we deal with non-singular protective varieties over the field of complex numbers. Let W be a variety whose fundamental group is solvable, let H be an ample line bundle on W, and let f:V-*W be an unramified covering. Then we show in section 1 that if E is an /*£f-stable vector bundle on V then f#E is a direct sum of ίf-stable vector bundles. In particular fJL, is a direct sum of simple vector bundles if L is a line bundle on V. This result is a corollary of the following: Let A be a finite solvable group of automorphisms of a variety V. Suppose A acts freely on V. Let W be the quotient of V by A and let / be the natural morphism V —> W. Then the direct image of an /*ίί-stable vector bundle on V by / is a direct sum of iϊ-stable vector bundles, and the inverse image of an ίf-stable vector bundle on W by / is a direct sum of f*H-stable vector bundles. In section 2 we prove the independence of H in the definition of the iϊ-stability. Namely, let S be a relatively minimal surface, and let E be a vector bundle of rank two on S with c\{E) ^Ac2(E). Then E is iϊ-stable if and only if E is ίΓ-stable, where H and Hf are ample line bundles on S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Invariants and Moduli Shigeru Mukai Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40636-0 - An Introduction to Invariants and Moduli Shigeru Mukai Index More information Index 1-parameter subgroup (1-PS), 110, 212 algebraic number field, 270, 397 normalised, 224 algebraic representation, 117 algebraic torus, 122 A5,17 is linearly reductive, 131 affine quotient map, 159 algebraic variety, xvi, 77, 91, 398 Abel, xix alternating group, 10 Abel’s Theorem, 288, 334, 345, 347 ample, 447 Abel-Jacobi map, 287, 334 analytic Jacobian, 341, 452 abelian differential, 337 anharmonic, 32 abelian varieties, xv, 399 Apollonius, 7 action of an affine algebraic group, 103 approximation of the quotient functor, 402 action of ray type, 322 Approximation Theorem, 112 adjoint of a bundle map, 456 arithmetic genus, 287, 293, 337 adjoint functors, 286 arithmetic Jacobian, 426 adjoint representation, 127 Artin ring, 312 adjugate matrix, 58 ascending chain condition, 54 affine algebraic group, 100 automorphic form, 43 affine algebraic variety, 85 averaging map, 14 affine charts, 95 axis of a double point, 224 affine curves, 288 affine hyperelliptic curve, 234, 271 Base Change Theorem, 400, 405 affine hypersurface, 81 base point free, 308 affine Jacobian basic open set, 79 of a plane curve, 424 best approximation (by an algebraic variety), of a spectral curve, 424 399, 402 affine line, 172 Betti numbers, 336 is not complete, 104 Big Bang, 485 affine quotient map, 164, 176, 182, 184, 190, bigraded ring, 73 315, 402 support of, 70 affine space, 77, 78, 158, 163, 181 bilinear relations for differentials of divisor affine variety,
    [Show full text]