Solubility Behaviour of Random and Gradient Copolymers of Di
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Soft Matter View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue Solubility behaviour of random and gradient copolymers of di- and oligo(ethylene oxide) Cite this: Soft Matter, 2020, 16,1066 methacrylate in water: effect of various additives† Maryam Bozorg,a Birgit Hankiewicza and Volker Abetz *ab Poly[oligo(ethylene oxide)] based gradient and random copolymers with different compositions are synthesized via Cu-based atom transfer radical polymerization. The solubility behavior of these copolymers in pure water and in the presence of different salts, surfactants and ethanol is investigated. According to dynamic light scattering results, the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) depends on the structure of the copolymer and changes slightly in the presence of additives. Good cosolvents like ethanol can increase the LCST through dissolving the collapsed copolymer chains to some extent. The same effect is observed for surfactants that make the copolymer solution more stable by preventing aggregation. Above a certain concentration of surfactant, depending on the copolymer structure, the solution is Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. stable at all temperatures (no LCST). The effect of salts on the solubility of the copolymers follows the Hofmeister series and it is related linearly to the salt concentration. Based on their affinity to the copolymer, the salts can increase or decrease the LCST. There is a considerable difference in phase transition changes for gradient or random copolymers after salt addition. While both copolymers show a Received 11th October 2019, two-step phase transition in the presence of different salts, the changes in the hydrodynamic radius and Accepted 1st December 2019 normalized scattering intensity are rather broad for random compared to gradient copolymers. Contrary DOI: 10.1039/c9sm02032b to what was expected, varying the cations has no distinguishable effect on the LCST for both copolymers. All chlorides decrease the LCST. This decrease is almost the same for gradient copolymers This article is licensed under a rsc.li/soft-matter-journal and fluctuates for random copolymers. hyperthermia-induced drug delivery. For POEOMAs, the phase Open Access Article. Published on 03 December 2019. Downloaded 10/2/2021 12:13:10 PM. Introduction transition temperature depends slightly on the molecular POEOMAs are nonlinear poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) or poly(ethylene weight, main-chain end-groups, tacticity and ionic strength. glycol) (PEG) analogues. They can be up to 85 wt% composed of However, the changes in LCST are generally rather small.1–5 ethylene oxide units (EO), and therefore are water soluble and For a long time, PNIPAM has held the title of ‘‘gold standard’’ biocompatible in most cases. POEOMAs combine both the for thermoresponsive polymers in bio-application due to its properties of PEG and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) LCST of 32 1C, which is close to the physiological temperature. in a single macromolecule and therefore are considered as ideal However, POEOMAs can exhibit an adjustable LCST between 26 structures for use in biomedicine. The LCST of these polymers and 90 1C by simple copolymerization of OEOMAs with different does not depend much on the solution concentration in water amounts of EO in the side chain. The LCST can be precisely (above approx. 1 g LÀ1), which is an important factor for adjusted by the copolymer composition considering that the application in biotechnology. Moreover, being produced from a comonomers have a similar structure containing a methacrylate commercially available monomer, POEOMA containing polymers moiety and ethylene oxide units.1,6 Moreover, the phase transi- are favorable to be used as smart biomaterials in biosensors, tion of these copolymers is reversible, in comparison to PNIPAM artificial tissues, smart gels for chromatography and which shows an irreversible phase transition.4,7 The solubility behavior of PNIPAM also shows a significant dependency to its end group.8 Furthermore, the presence of the amide group at a Institute of Physical Chemistry, Universita¨t Hamburg, Grindelallee 117, the side chain of PNIPAM might cause hydrogen bonding with 20146 Hamburg, Germany other polyamides like proteins and result in bio-adhesion.9 b Institute of Polymer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] PNIPAM also produces low molecular weight amines during † Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Kinetics graphs, SEC hydrolysis which complicates its use in biotechnological 10 traces, 1H NMR and DLS graphs. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sm02032b applications. 1066 | Soft Matter, 2020, 16, 1066--1081 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 View Article Online Paper Soft Matter The outstanding solubility behavior of POEOMA is due to its transition between hydrated CQO, semi-dehydrated CQOand hydrogen bonding with water and lack of strong polymer– dehydrated CQO.15 polymer interactions in the collapsed state. Like PNIPAM, the A two-step phase transition is also observed by Yao and 16 phase transition of POEOMA is attributed to the competition Tam for the behavior of PMEO2MA-block-(PMEO2MA-stat- between hydrophilic polymer–water interactions and hydro- POEGMA300) block copolymers. They observed that by changing phobic polymer–polymer interactions. At temperatures below the ratio of MEO2MA/OEGMA300 from 80/20 to 70/30 the the LCST, polymer–water interactions are thermodynamically copolymer’s solution behavior changes from showing one favorable which makes the polymer soluble in water. Above thermal transition to two. A similar phenomenon has also been LCST, the polymer–polymer interactions become more favored observed by Gibson et al.17 for the mixture of two POEGMA which results in the self-aggregation of the polymers and phase chains with different molecular weights. The independent transition in the form of globules or micelles depending on the phase transitions are described by the weak molecular weight structure of the POEOMA copolymer.1,3,11 Maeda et al. discovered dependence of the polymers’ cloud point. that both CQO and C–H groups are hydrated in poly di(ethylene By increasing the number of blocks, Kudo et al.18 observed a oxide) methyl ether methacrylate (PMEO2MA) aqueous solution, multi-step phase separation for the hexa-block copolymer but due to the crowded position of the carbonyl groups near the P[MEO2MA-block-(MEO2MA-stat-OEOMA)]. They synthesized backbone, only about half of these moieties are hydrated. By this hexa-block by semi-batch RAFT polymerization with the increasing the temperature above LCST, the fraction of hydrogen- addition of more OEOMA every two hours and therefore, the bonded carbonyl groups decreases. Moreover, the complete break- concentration of OEOMA in the reaction flask increased in age of the H-bond between the ether oxygens with water is reported. batches, not gradually. Upon sequential dehydration, each The fraction of hydrogen-bonding methoxy oxygens changes from block of the hexa-block copolymer showed its own temperature one below LCST to zero after LCST. These results indicate that the responsive behavior. The thermoresponsivity in each step was hydrogen bond breakage is the main reason for phase separation of reversible with 2 1C hysteresis. Overall, the behavior of the block 12,13 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence. POEOMAs. copolymer showed slight similarity to gradient copolymers. To the A similar behavior is observed for the solubility of P(MEO2MA- best of our knowledge, this is the only study mentioning the stat-OEGMA475) copolymers in D2O which shows a sharp change in solubility behavior of gradient POEOMA copolymers with a similar the hydrodynamic radius at the LCST and a gradual change above comonomer structure. LCST. The phase transition of P(MEO2MA-stat-OEGMA475)occurs Studies on the solubility behavior of gradient copolymers due to multiple chain aggregation without pre-connection of consisting of a hydrophilic and a hydrophobic monomer show individual polymer chains. Self-aggregation of P(MEO2MA-stat- that the solubility behavior changes drastically, depending OEGMA475) is mainly based on the conformation change of more on the interaction of the comonomers with water and ethylene oxide side chains. They first collapse to be near the their hydrophobicity rather than their sequential order in the This article is licensed under a hydrophobic backbone and then distort to bring hydrophilic copolymer structure.19,20 On the other hand, the thermal phase ether oxygen groups to the ‘‘outer shell’’ of polymer chains as far transition of other temperature responsive gradient copolymers as possible. As a result of disturbance in the balance between consisting of monomers with similar chemical structure and hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions, the single dehydrated therefore, similar hydrophobicity has shown considerable differ- Open Access Article. Published on 03 December 2019. Downloaded 10/2/2021 12:13:10 PM. polymer chains aggregate into more stable micelles and cause a ences from the respective random and block copolymers and sharp change below LCST.3 dependent on their sequential order in the gradient structure. This The P(MEO2MA-stat-PEGMA2080) copolymer in aqueous dilute characteristic makes such gradient copolymers a great potential in solution undergoes a similar phase separation mechanism. biomimetic applications.21–29 However, compared to other random copolymers of MEO2MA Various studies