Veterinary Ectoparasitology - Douglas D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Biological Diversity in the Patent System
Biological Diversity in the Patent System Paul Oldham1,2*, Stephen Hall1,3, Oscar Forero1,4 1 ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (Cesagen), Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 2 Institute of Advanced Studies, United Nations University, Yokohama, Japan, 3 One World Analytics, Lancaster, United Kingdom, 4 Centre for Development, Environment and Policy, SOAS, University of London, London, United Kingdom Abstract Biological diversity in the patent system is an enduring focus of controversy but empirical analysis of the presence of biodiversity in the patent system has been limited. To address this problem we text mined 11 million patent documents for 6 million Latin species names from the Global Names Index (GNI) established by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and Encyclopedia of Life (EOL). We identified 76,274 full Latin species names from 23,882 genera in 767,955 patent documents. 25,595 species appeared in the claims section of 136,880 patent documents. This reveals that human innovative activity involving biodiversity in the patent system focuses on approximately 4% of taxonomically described species and between 0.8–1% of predicted global species. In this article we identify the major features of the patent landscape for biological diversity by focusing on key areas including pharmaceuticals, neglected diseases, traditional medicines, genetic engineering, foods, biocides, marine genetic resources and Antarctica. We conclude that the narrow focus of human innovative activity and ownership of genetic resources is unlikely to be in the long term interest of humanity. We argue that a broader spectrum of biodiversity needs to be opened up to research and development based on the principles of equitable benefit-sharing, respect for the objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity, human rights and ethics. -
Effect of Different Constant Temperature on the Life Cycle of A
& Herpeto gy lo lo gy o : h C it u n r r r e O n , t y R g Entomology, Ornithology & e o l s Bansode et al., Entomol Ornithol Herpetol 2016, 5:3 o e a m r o c t h n E DOI: 10.4172/2161-0983.1000183 ISSN: 2161-0983 Herpetology: Current Research Research Article Open Access Effect of Different Constant Temperature on the Life Cycle of a Fly of Forensic Importance Lucilia cuprina Bansode SA1*, More VR1, and Zambare SP2 1Department of Zoology, Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India 2Department of Zoology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India *Corresponding author: Bansode SA, Department of Zoology, Government College of Arts and Science, Aurangabad-431004, Maharashtra, India, Tel: 09665285290; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: July 08, 2016; Accepted date: July 29, 2016; Published date: August 02, 2016 Copyright: © 2016 Bansode SA, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Abstract Lucilia cuprina is one of the forensically important Calliphoridae fly. L. cuprina is a helpful resource at the crime scenes as well as a nuisance to sheep. It is known to be one of the first flies to occupy a corpse upon its death. Due to this, it has great importance in forensic field to find out post-mortem interval. In this study, the development of L. cuprina is studied in an incubator at different constant temperatures. -
Toleration of Lucilia Cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Eggs to Agitation Within Insect Saline
Toleration of Lucilia cuprina (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Eggs to Agitation Within Insect Saline Christina Kaye Alvarez and Dr. Adrienne Brundage Editor: Colton Cooper Abstract: Microorganisms have an ability to attach themselves to surfaces, where they then multiply and form a protective biofilm, which protects the microorganisms from outside influences, including chemicals for sanitation. This makes the cleaning of fly eggs for maggot therapy difficult. The purpose of this study was to test the toleration of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) eggs for agitation, which is used to degrade biofilms. Lucilia cuprina eggs were washed with insect saline and treated by undergoing five minutes of agitation. It was found that there was a significant difference between the control group, which did not undergo any agitation, and the treatment group, which did. This knowledge is useful for further testing of the extent to which agitation impacts survivability of the eggs and the debridement of the biofilm. Keywords: Lucilia cuprina, maggot, debridement, biofilm Introduction side effects (Chai et al., 2014). This is no different for insect eggs, whose surfaces can Microorganisms have a propensity to be contaminated by various microorganisms attach themselves to surfaces, where they and for whom research is still ongoing to then multiply and often form a protective determine effective methods of surface biofilm (BF) (Chai et al., 2014). These sanitation, especially for use in maggot biofilms are made up of many different therapy. substances such as proteins, nucleic acids, mineral ions, and other debris from the cell Maggot therapy is the deliberate (Orgaz et al., 2006). Biofilms serve as treatment of wounds using fly larvae, and protective environments for bacteria under the species L. -
REVISTA Brasilelra DE ZOOLOGIA
REVISTA BRASILElRA DE ZOOLOGIA Revta bras. Zool., S Paulo 3(3): 109-169 28.vi.l985 A REVISION OF THE NEW WORLD CHRYSOMYINI (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) JAMES P. DEAR ABSTRACT The 24 New World species of Chrysomyini are revised. Keys are given to genera and species with illustrations of characters of diagnostic and syste matic importance. All taxa are fully described (except for the species of Chrysomya and Cochliomyia), and reference is made to their biology where is known. There are 20 endemic species (1 Chloroprocta, 3 Paralucilia, 6 He milucilia, 4 Cochliomyia, 6 Compsomyops), and 4 Chrysomya have been in troduced from the Old World. Four new species are described: Paralucilia adesposta, P. xantogeneiates, Hermilucilia melusina, Compsomyops melloi. The re are 2 new generic and 2 new specific synonymies. The types of previously described species have been examined wherever possible, and lectotypes de signated where appropriate. INTRODUCTION The Calliphorid tribe Chrysomyini is represented in the New World by 20 endemic species and four introduced species: the endemic species are in cluded in five genera (Chloroprocta, Paralucilia, Hemilucilia, Cochliomyia, Compsomyops) whilst the introduced species all belong to the Old World genus Chrysomya. Like their Old World relatives, the New World Chrysomyini are large, robust, metallic blowflies, but in their morphology they differ consi derably from these and, furthermore, each genus has one or more unusual (autapomorphic) characters. The following key will separate the New World subfamilies of Callipho ridae: I. Posterior spiracle with a long fringe of dense hairs which extend from the posterior margin along the lower margin to the anterior margin in a continuous fan. -
Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOLUME 104, NUMBER 7 THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS BY R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine Agricultural Research Administration U. S. Department of Agriculture P£R\ (Publication 3773) CITY OF WASHINGTON PUBLISHED BY THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION OCTOBER 24, 1944 BALTIMORE, MO., U. S. A. THE FEEDING APPARATUS OF BITING AND SUCKING INSECTS AFFECTING MAN AND ANIMALS By R. E. SNODGRASS Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine, Agricultural Research Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture CONTENTS Page Introduction 2 I. The cockroach. Order Orthoptera 3 The head and the organs of ingestion 4 General structure of the head and mouth parts 4 The labrum 7 The mandibles 8 The maxillae 10 The labium 13 The hypopharynx 14 The preoral food cavity 17 The mechanism of ingestion 18 The alimentary canal 19 II. The biting lice and booklice. Orders Mallophaga and Corrodentia. 21 III. The elephant louse 30 IV. The sucking lice. Order Anoplura 31 V. The flies. Order Diptera 36 Mosquitoes. Family Culicidae 37 Sand flies. Family Psychodidae 50 Biting midges. Family Heleidae 54 Black flies. Family Simuliidae 56 Net-winged midges. Family Blepharoceratidae 61 Horse flies. Family Tabanidae 61 Snipe flies. Family Rhagionidae 64 Robber flies. Family Asilidae 66 Special features of the Cyclorrhapha 68 Eye gnats. -
Hairy Maggot Blow Fly, Chrysomya Rufifacies (Macquart)1 J
EENY-023 Hairy Maggot Blow Fly, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart)1 J. H. Byrd2 Introduction hardened shell which looks similar to a rat dropping or a cockroach egg case. Insects in the family Calliphoridae are generally referred to as blow flies or bottle flies. Blow flies can be found in almost every terrestrial habitat and are found in association Life Cycle with humans throughout the world. In 1980 the immigrant species Chrysomya rufifacies was first recovered in the continental United States. This species is expected to increase its range in the United States. Distribution This species is now established in southern California, Arizona, Texas, Louisiana, and Florida. It is also found throughout Central America, Japan, India, and the remain- der of the Old World. Description Adults (Figure 1) are robust flies metallic green in color Figure 1. Adult hairy maggot blow fly, Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) with a distinct blue hue when viewed under bright sunlit Credits: James Castner, University of Florida conditions. The posterior margins of the abdominal tergites are a brilliant blue. The fly life cycle includes four life stages: egg, larva, pupa, and adult. The eggs are approximately 1 mm long and are The larvae are known as hairy maggots. They received laid in a loose mass of 50 to 200 eggs. Group oviposition this name because each body segment possesses a median by several females results in masses of thousands of eggs row of fleshy tubercles that give the fly a slightly hairy that may completely cover a decomposing carcass. The appearance although it does not possess any true hairs. -
Arthropods Associated with Wildlife Carcasses in Lowland Rainforest, Rivers State, Nigeria
Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibra ry.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2013, 3(5):111-114 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU Arthropods associated with wildlife carcasses in Lowland Rainforest, Rivers State, Nigeria Osborne U. Ndueze, Mekeu A. E. Noutcha, Odidika C. Umeozor and Samuel N. Okiwelu* Entomology and Pest Management Unit, Department of Animal and Environmental Biology, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Investigations were conducted in the rainy season August-October, 2011, to identify the arthropods associated with carcasses of the Greater Cane Rat, Thryonomys swinderianus; two-spotted Palm Civet, Nandina binotata, Mona monkey, Cercopithecus mona and Maxwell’s duiker, Philantomba maxwelli in lowland rainforest, Nigeria. Collections were made from carcasses in sheltered environment and open vegetation. Carcasses were purchased in pairs at the Omagwa bushmeat market as soon as they were brought in by hunters. They were transported to the Animal House, University of Port Harcourt. Carcasses of each species were placed in cages in sheltered location and open vegetation. Flying insects were collected with hand nets, while crawling insects were trapped in water. Necrophages, predators and transients were collected. The dominant insect orders were: Diptera, Coleoptera and Hymenoptera. The most common species were the dipteran necrophages: Musca domestica (Muscidae), Lucilia serricata -
And Chrysomya Rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Author(S): Sonja Lise Swiger, Jerome A
Laboratory Colonization of the Blow Flies, Chrysomya Megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) Author(s): Sonja Lise Swiger, Jerome A. Hogsette, and Jerry F. Butler Source: Journal of Economic Entomology, 107(5):1780-1784. 2014. Published By: Entomological Society of America URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/EC14146 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR Laboratory Colonization of the Blow Flies, Chrysomya megacephala (Diptera: Calliphoridae) and Chrysomya rufifacies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) 1,2,3 4 1 SONJA LISE SWIGER, JEROME A. HOGSETTE, AND JERRY F. BUTLER J. Econ. Entomol. 107(5): 1780Ð1784 (2014); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC14146 ABSTRACT Chrysomya megacephala (F.) and Chrysomya rufifacies (Macquart) were colonized so that larval growth rates could be compared. Colonies were also established to provide insight into the protein needs of adult C. -
Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii
Chapter Phylogeny and Functional Morphology of Diptera (Flies) Benjamin Kongyeli Badii Abstract The order Diptera includes all true flies. Members of this order are the most ecologically diverse and probably have a greater economic impact on humans than any other group of insects. The application of explicit methods of phylogenetic and morphological analysis has revealed weaknesses in the traditional classification of dipteran insects, but little progress has been made to achieve a robust, stable clas- sification that reflects evolutionary relationships and morphological adaptations for a more precise understanding of their developmental biology and behavioral ecol- ogy. The current status of Diptera phylogenetics is reviewed in this chapter. Also, key aspects of the morphology of the different life stages of the flies, particularly characters useful for taxonomic purposes and for an understanding of the group’s biology have been described with an emphasis on newer contributions and progress in understanding this important group of insects. Keywords: Tephritoidea, Diptera flies, Nematocera, Brachycera metamorphosis, larva 1. Introduction Phylogeny refers to the evolutionary history of a taxonomic group of organisms. Phylogeny is essential in understanding the biodiversity, genetics, evolution, and ecology among groups of organisms [1, 2]. Functional morphology involves the study of the relationships between the structure of an organism and the function of the various parts of an organism. The old adage “form follows function” is a guiding principle of functional morphology. It helps in understanding the ways in which body structures can be used to produce a wide variety of different behaviors, including moving, feeding, fighting, and reproducing. It thus, integrates concepts from physiology, evolution, anatomy and development, and synthesizes the diverse ways that biological and physical factors interact in the lives of organisms [3]. -
Terry Whitworth 3707 96Th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446
Terry Whitworth 3707 96th ST E, Tacoma, WA 98446 Washington State University E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Published in Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington Vol. 108 (3), 2006, pp 689–725 Websites blowflies.net and birdblowfly.com KEYS TO THE GENERA AND SPECIES OF BLOW FLIES (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) OF AMERICA, NORTH OF MEXICO UPDATES AND EDITS AS OF SPRING 2017 Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 Materials and Methods ................................................................................................... 5 Separating families ....................................................................................................... 10 Key to subfamilies and genera of Calliphoridae ........................................................... 13 See Table 1 for page number for each species Table 1. Species in order they are discussed and comparison of names used in the current paper with names used by Hall (1948). Whitworth (2006) Hall (1948) Page Number Calliphorinae (18 species) .......................................................................................... 16 Bellardia bayeri Onesia townsendi ................................................... 18 Bellardia vulgaris Onesia bisetosa ..................................................... -
Oriental Blow Fly
Livestock Management Insect Pests Sept. 2003, LM-10.6 Oriental Blow Fly Michael W. DuPonte1 and Linda Burnham Larish2 1CTAHR Department of Human Nutrition, Food and Animal Sciences, 2Hawaii Department of Health Chrysomya megacephala Fabricius Origin The oriental blow fly was first collected in Kona, Ha waii, by Grimshaw in 1892 and is now found through out the Hawaiian islands up to about 4000 feet eleva tion. Public health concern The oriental blow fly carries intestinal pathogens and will invade diseased tissue. It causes public complaints when large numbers emerge from animal carcasses or garbage. Larval age is used in forensic entomology to determine the postmortem interval. Hosts Feed on human and livestock excreta, fish, meats, or Control ganic garbage, anything sweet. and dead carcasses Poultry operations need to incinerate or compost dead birds and dispose of broken eggs before flies breed. Livestock concern Hog farms need to cook garbage and dispose of raw slop. Can become a nuisance at poultry facilities due to dead Homeowners and restaurants should remove garbage at birds and broken eggs. least twice a week and keep the area clean Hog operations generate blow flies from wet garbage. Insecticidal sprays can be used to control adults on sur Description faces where they land 3 Large fly, over ⁄8 inches long. Adults are bright metallic green with black margins on References Hardy, D. Elmo. 1981. Insects of Hawaii, vol. 14 Diptera: Cyclop the second and third abdominal segments. phapha IV. Univ. Hawaii Press, Honolulu. pp. 356–359. Adult flies have large red eyes, almost touching in the Pereira, Marcelo de Campos. -
Parasiticides: Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Moxidectin Livestock
Parasiticides: Fenbendazole, Ivermectin, Moxidectin Livestock 1 Identification of Petitioned Substance* 2 3 Chemical Names: 48 Ivermectin: Heart Guard, Sklice, Stomectol, 4 Moxidectin:(1'R,2R,4Z,4'S,5S,6S,8'R,10'E,13'R,14'E 49 Ivomec, Mectizan, Ivexterm, Scabo 6 5 ,16'E,20'R,21'R,24'S)-21',24'-Dihydroxy-4 50 Thiabendazole: Mintezol, Tresaderm, Arbotect 6 (methoxyimino)-5,11',13',22'-tetramethyl-6-[(2E)- 51 Albendazole: Albenza 7 4-methyl-2-penten-2-yl]-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2'H- 52 Levamisole: Ergamisol 8 spiro[pyran-2,6'-[3,7,1 9]trioxatetracyclo 53 Morantel tartrate: Rumatel 9 [15.6.1.14,8.020,24] pentacosa[10,14,16,22] tetraen]- 54 Pyrantel: Banminth, Antiminth, Cobantril 10 2'-one; (2aE, 4E,5’R,6R,6’S,8E,11R,13S,- 55 Doramectin: Dectomax 11 15S,17aR,20R,20aR,20bS)-6’-[(E)-1,2-Dimethyl-1- 56 Eprinomectin: Ivomec, Longrange 12 butenyl]-5’,6,6’,7,10,11,14,15,17a,20,20a,20b- 57 Piperazine: Wazine, Pig Wormer 13 dodecahydro-20,20b-dihydroxy-5’6,8,19-tetra- 58 14 methylspiro[11,15-methano-2H,13H,17H- CAS Numbers: 113507-06-5; 15 furo[4,3,2-pq][2,6]benzodioxacylooctadecin-13,2’- Moxidectin: 16 [2H]pyrano]-4’,17(3’H)-dione,4’-(E)-(O- Fenbendazole: 43210-67-9; 70288-86-7 17 methyloxime) Ivermectin: 59 Thiabendazole: 148-79-8 18 Fenbendazole: methyl N-(6-phenylsulfanyl-1H- 60 Albendazole: 54965-21-8 19 benzimidazol-2-yl) carbamate 61 Levamisole: 14769-72-4 20 Ivermectin: 22,23-dihydroavermectin B1a +22,23- 21 dihydroavermectin B1b 62 Morantel tartrate: 26155-31-7 63 Pyrantel: 22204-24-6 22 Thiabendazole: 4-(1H-1,3-benzodiazol-2-yl)-1,3- 23 thiazole