DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved and Adopted East Silver Spring Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved and Adopted East Silver Spring Master Plan APPROVED AND ADOPTED EAST SILVER SPRING MASTER PLAN December 2000 Prepared by THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION Montgomery County Department of Park and Planning 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910 ABSTRACT TITLE: East Silver Spring Approved and Adopted Master Plan AUTHOR: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission SUBJECT: Comprehensive Master Plan Amendment to the 1977 Silver Spring - East Master Plan DATE: December 2000 PLANNING The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission AGENCY: 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3760 SOURCE OF The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission COPIES: 8787 Georgia Avenue Silver Spring, Maryland 20910-3760 ABSTRACT: This document contains the text and supporting maps for the Planning Board Draft of the East Silver Spring Master Plan. This Master Plan is a comprehensive amendment to the 1977 Silver Spring - East Master Plan, as well as an amendment to The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District Within Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties, as amended, the 1967 Kemp Mill-Four Corners Master Plan, as amended, the Master Plan of Bikeways, as amended, the Master Plan of Highways Within Montgomery County, Maryland, as amended, and the Master Plan for Historic Preservation, as amended. East Silver Spring Master Planii Approved and Adopted, December 2000 THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission is a bi-county agency created by the General Assembly of Maryland in 1927. The Commission's geographic authority covers most of Montgomery and Prince George's counties. The Commission’s planning jurisdiction, the Maryland-Washington Regional District, comprises 1,001 square miles; its parks jurisdiction, the Metropolitan District, comprises 919 square miles. The Commission has three major functions: (1) The preparation, adoption, and, from time to time, amendment or extension of The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for the Physical Development of the Maryland-Washington Regional District Within Montgomery and Prince George's Counties. (2) The acquisition, development, operation, and maintenance of a public park system. (3) In Prince George's County only, the operation of the entire County public recreation program. The Commission operates in each County through a Planning Board appointed by and responsible to the County government. The Planning Boards are responsible for preparation of all local master plans, recommendations on zoning amendments, administration of subdivision regulations, and general administration of parks. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission encourages the involvement and participation of individuals with disabilities, and its facilities are accessible. For assistance with special needs (e.g., large print materials, listening devices, sign language interpretation, etc.), please contact the Community Relations Office, (301) 495-4600 or T.D. (301) 495-1331. East Silver Spring Master Planiii Approved and Adopted, December 2000 COUNTY COUNCIL Blair Ewing, President Steven Silverman Phil Andrews Derick P. Berlage Nancy Dacek Howard A. Denis Isiah Leggett Marilyn J. Praisner Michael L. Subin COUNTY EXECUTIVE Douglas M. Duncan THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman William H. Hussmann, Vice Chairman COMMISSIONERS Montgomery County Prince George's County Planning Board Planning Board William H. Hussmann, Chairman Elizabeth M. Hewlett, Chairman Arthur Holmes, Jr.,Vice Chairman James M. Brown Allison Bryant William M. Eley, Jr. Wendy Collins Perdue George H. Lowe, Jr. Meredith Wellington East Silver Spring Master Planiv Approved and Adopted, December 2000 E A S T S I L V E R S P R I N G M A S T E R P L A N A D V I S O R Y G R O U P Bill Kaplan, Chair Lori Aniti Dale Barnhard Bob Colvin Ricardo Ernesto Compos Rosita Dee Pat Haley Bill Hanna Melanie Isis Jim Johnson Martha J. Waddy East Silver Spring Master Planv Approved and Adopted, December 2000 N O T I C E T O R E A D E R S An area master plan, after approval by the County Council and adoption by The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, constitutes an amendment to The General Plan (On Wedges and Corridors) for Montgomery County. As such, it provides a set of comprehensive recommendations and guidelines for the use of publicly and privately owned land within its planning area. Each area master plan reflects a vision of future development that responds to the unique character of the local community within the context of a County-wide perspective. Area master plans are intended to provide a point of reference with regard to public policy. Together with relevant County-wide functional master plans (such as the Master Plan of Highways in Montgomery County; the Master Plan for Historic Preservation; and the Master Plan for the Preservation of Agricultural and Rural Open Space), they should be referred to by public officials and private individuals when decisions are made that affect the use of land within the plan boundaries. Master plans generally look ahead about 20 years from the date of adoption, although they are intended to be updated and revised every 10 years. It is recognized that circumstances will change following adoption of a plan and that the specifics of a master plan may become less relevant over time. Generally, sketches or drawings in an adopted master plan are for illustrative purposes only and are intended to convey a general sense of desirable future character rather than a specific commitment to a particular detailed design. It is also important to recognize that the land use and zoning recommendations in master plans do not specify all development possibilities. In order to understand the full range of development options, the reader should be aware of additional land uses and development potential available through permitted special exception uses; variances; transferrable development rights (TDRs); Moderately Priced Dwelling Units (MPDUs); land rezoning by local map amendment; public projects and the mandatory referral process; and municipal annexations. These terms are described in Appendix A and in the Glossary of Planning Terms published separately by the Montgomery County Department of Park and Planning. East Silver Spring Master Planvi Approved and Adopted, December 2000 East Silver Spring Master Planvii Approved and Adopted, December 2000 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Page No. Plan Highlights .................................................................. 1 Overview .................................................................. 3 Community Preservation, Stability, and Character .............................. 6 Commercial Centers...................................................... 7 Community Facilities, Parks, and Environmental Resources ...................... 8 Neighborhood-Friendly Circulation .......................................... 9 Plan Introduction ................................................................ 11 Planning Context ............................................................ 13 The Role of a Master Plan ..................................................... 14 The Master Planning Process ................................................... 15 Relationship to Other Plans................................................ 15 Outreach Program ....................................................... 15 Overarching Issues....................................................... 17 Next Steps ............................................................. 17 Plan Recommendations ........................................................... 19 Introduction to Plan Recommendations ........................................... 21 Community Preservation, Stability, and Character .................................. 25 Introduction to the Theme ................................................. 25 Land Use and Neighborhood Preservation .................................... 26 Land Use and Zoning................................................. 26 Revitalization and Diversity............................................ 27 Neighborhood Protection .............................................. 29 Flower Avenue Neighborhood in East Silver Spring ............................. 30 Fenton Street Village Neighborhood ......................................... 30 Piney Branch Road Site................................................... 32 Historic Resources....................................................... 32 Commercial Centers—Character and Vitality ...................................... 35 Introduction to the Theme ................................................. 35 Commercial Revitalization................................................. 36 Flower Village Center .................................................... 39 Clifton Park Crossroads Center............................................. 41 New Hampshire Estates ............................................... 42 Northeast Clifton Park ................................................ 42 Community Facilities, Parks, and Environmental Resources .......................... 45 Introduction to the Theme ................................................. 45 Community Facilities ..................................................... 45 Parks and Open Space .................................................... 47 Stream Valley Parks.................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • South Branch Patapsco River Watershed Characterization Plan
    South Branch Patapsco River Watershed Characterization Plan Spring 2016 Prepared by Carroll County Bureau of Resource Management South Branch Patapsco Watershed Characterization Plan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Appendices .......................................................................................................................... v List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... vi I. Characterization Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose of the Characterization ....................................................................................... 1 B. Location and Scale of Analysis ........................................................................................ 1 C. Report Organization ......................................................................................................... 3 II. Natural Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 5 A. Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Line Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Crossing
    Executive Director’s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 1, 2018 PROJECT NCPC FILE NUMBER Purple Line Light Rail Transit Facility 7949 Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park Montgomery County, Maryland NCPC MAP FILE NUMBER 76.45.02(41.23)44678 SUBMITTED BY Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning APPLICANT’S REQUEST Commission Approval of preliminary and final site development plans REVIEW AUTHORITY PROPOSED ACTION Capper Cramton Act Review Approve preliminary and final site per 46 Stat. 482 development plans ACTION ITEM TYPE Consent Calendar PROJECT SUMMARY On behalf of the Maryland Transit Authority, the Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission has requested preliminary and final review of site development plans on Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park property to accommodate the new Purple Line light rail transit facility. The new transit line will cross through the park along Wayne Avenue (within its vehicular traffic lanes), across Sligo Creek via a new (widened) bridge and across the Sligo Creek Parkway. The Purple Line is planned as a 16-mile, regionally-significant, transit facility between Bethesda, Maryland (Montgomery County) and New Carrollton, Maryland (Prince George’s County), providing east- west connectivity between the Metrorail’s Red, Orange, and Green Lines. Construction will occur between 2018-2021 within the Sligo Creek Stream Valley Park. KEY INFORMATION • NCPC has approval authority of the project since the site is located on property acquired with federal funding appropriated under the 1930 Capper Cramton Act. The Act was intended to provide for the acquisition of lands in Maryland and Virginia to develop a comprehensive park, parkway, and playground system in the National Capital.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 State Parks Could Close for Financial Reasons
    News from NARRP This content is generated by members for members. Please send us your news, reports, job announcements, manuals and personal updates that may be of interest to other members. The National Association of Recreation Resource Planners NARRP membership dues increasing in 2010 It’s been 3 years since NARRP increased dues. At the last board meeting the beard voted to increase dues to keep up the increasing cost of doing business. Effective January 1, 2010, the annual membership rates will be: Individual - $75 Institutional - $75 first member and $70 each additional member Retiree – $33 (no increase) Student - $33 (no increase) Renew before December 31 and get the 2009 rate! Send NARRP your internship opportunities Did you know that NARRP has several student and recent graduate members that are looking to break into the profession? Most of these folks do not qualify for many of the job announcements that we send out, which call for experienced planners. Please send us your entry level and internship opportunities to help new planners develop their experience. Training Announcement Exit Strategies: Managing Human Waste in the Wild Presented by The American Alpine Club at the American Mountaineering Center Golden, Colorado July 30-31 and August 1, 2010 We invite top land managers, scientists, entrepreneurs, and wilderness participants from around the globe to discuss and formulate strategies for managing human waste in remote areas. The Exit Strategies conference will include general/plenary sessions, poster presentations, field- proven techniques and opportunities for focused problem solving. To create a productive setting in which participants can spark important conversations, explore innovative ideas, and develop effective solutions, the conference will be limited to 100 attendees Registration: $150.00 for attendees, $25 for students (reduced fee provided by "Leave No Trace"), $300 for Vendors.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Concept Report
    Rhode Island Avenue Trolley Trail Extension TTrraaiill CCoonncceepptt RReeppoorrtt December 1, 2008 Prepared for The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George’s County Maryland by Prepared under contract with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince Georges County, Maryland Rhode Island Avenue Trolley Trail Planning and Design Sabra Wang, Associates: Job No. 26-124 Toole Design Group: Project No. 5201 Task 1: Overall Planning and Design Table of Contents Background .......................................................................................... 1 Trail Name........................................................................................... 1 A Transportation and Recreation Facility ...................................................... 3 Design Guidelines .................................................................................. 4 A.—Armentrout Drive to Farragut Street .................................................. 5 B.—Farragut Street to Ingraham Street ...................................................14 C.—Ingraham Street to Riverdale Road....................................................16 D.-- From Riverdale Rd through the Riverdale Park Town Center Parking Lot...21 E.--From the East-West Highway overpass to Albion Road ...........................24 General Access Issues.............................................................................27 Trail Waysides .....................................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Open the Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan Announces Support for the Trestle and the Trail by Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair
    HERESCENT Fall 1999 Vol X No. 4 Coalition Hosts "Open The Trestle" Rally County Executive Doug Duncan announces support for the trestle and the Trail By Wayne Phyillaier/CCCT Chair One of the best ways to build support and stewardship of the Capital Crescent Trail is to provide opportunities for trail users and local residents to experience trail advocacy in a personal way. On Saturday, October 23d, the Coalition for the Capital Crescent Trail did just that. Trail lovers from all around the metropolitan area participated in Coalition-sponsored hikes, both walking and biking, to the Rock Creek Park trestle for an "Open The Trestle" rally. Several Coalition Board members addressed the rally, and outlined why I repairing and opening the trestle for Trail use was essential for completing a first class interim trail to Silver Spring. Results of a Coalition sponsored I engineering design study were presented that show how the trestle can be rebuilt for Trail use at a t Dozrg Dz~ncanut rally fraction of the cost of building a new bridge. Joining rally participants was Montgomery County Executive, Mr. Doug Duncan, who spoke in support of completing the Trail. In a surprise announcement, Mr. Duncan pledged to put funding to rebuild the trestle in the upcoming FY 2001-2002 budget. He challenged trail supporters to do their part and get the support of the five County Council members needed to pass the budget. Mr. Duncan's pledge of support is a very welcome event, and allows the Coalition to focus its advocacy for the trestle on the Montgomery County council.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Park Trails Plan Amendment
    MCPB Item #______ Date: 9/29/16 MEMORANDUM DATE: September 22, 2016 TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Michael F. Riley, Director of Parks Mitra Pedoeem, Deputy Director, Administration Dr. John E. Hench, Ph.D., Chief, Park Planning and Stewardship Division (PPSD) FROM: Charles S. Kines, AICP, Planner Coordinator (PPSD) Brooke Farquhar, Supervisor (PPSD) SUBJECT: Worksession #3, Countywide Park Trails Plan Amendment Recommended Planning Board Action Review, approve and adopt the plan amendment to be titled 2016 Countywide Park Trails Plan. (Attachment 1) Changes Made Since Public Hearing Draft Attached is the final draft of the plan amendment, including all Planning Board-requested changes from worksessions #1 and #2, as well as all appendices. Please focus your attention on the following pages and issues: 1. Page 34, added language to clarify the addition of the Northwest Branch Trail to the plan, in order to facilitate mountain biking access between US 29 (Colesville Rd) and Wheaton Regional Park. In addition, an errata sheet will be inserted in the Rachel Carson Trail Corridor Plan to reflect this change in policy. 2. Page 48, incorporating Planning Board-approved text from worksession #2, regarding policy for trail user types 3. Appendices 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 15. In addition, all maps now accurately reflect Planning Board direction. Trail Planning Work Program – Remainder of FY 17 Following the approval and adoption of this plan amendment, trail planning staff will perform the following tasks to implement the Plan and address other trail planning topics requested by the Planning Board: 1. Develop program of requirements for the top implementation priority for both natural and hard surface trails.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Existing Conditions Takoma/Langley Crossroads
    BACKGROUND AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Takoma/Langley Crossroads Preliminary Sector Plan BACKGROUND Project Description The Takoma/Langley Crossroads (TLC) plan area is a physically aging yet thriving multicultural community located along the border of Montgomery County and Prince George’s County in Maryland. The area was named the Takoma/Langley Crossroads during the 1980s by a group of community business leaders who recognized an opportunity to unite the strengths of the businesses in unincorporated Langley Park in Prince George’s County to those within the City of Takoma Park in Montgomery County. The plan area core is a mixture of low- to medium-density strip commercial centers around which are a variety of housing types with single-family detached dwellings predominant south of University Boulevard and typical post-World War II-style garden apartments predominant to the north. The Takoma/Langley Crossroads is considered Maryland’s International Corridor due to this community’s highly diverse racial and ethnic population and its concentration of businesses that cater to both the multicultural neighborhood and a regional clientele. Maintaining the International Corridor aspects of the TLC is a priority of this sector plan. In addition to sustaining the local residential diversity of the area, the sector plan purpose is to maintain the TLC’s current role as a commercial center for numerous ethnic groups in the region, a market that gives Takoma/Langley Crossroads a unique economic base for the future. The unincorporated community of Langley Park was designated a community center by the 2002 Prince George’s County Approved General Plan because of the potential for a Purple Line station at the intersection of New Hampshire Avenue and University Boulevard.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Previous Stream Biological and Habitat Assessments in Loudoun County
    Loudoun County Stream Assessment: Review of Previous Stream Biological and Habitat Assessments in Loudoun County Prepared for Loudoun County Department of Building and Development 1 Harrison St. Leesburg, VA 20175 Prepared by Nancy Roth, Beth Franks, Alexi Boado, Brenda Morgan, and Ginny Rogers Versar, Inc. 9200 Rumsey Road, Suite 100 Columbia, MD 21045 Submitted June 5, 2009 Revised September 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1-1 2 DATA AND LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................... 2-1 3 SPECIAL TOPICS .................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 STREAM IMPAIRMENTS ............................................................................. 3-1 3.2 TEMPORAL TRENDS .................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 SPECIFIC STREAM HABITAT PARAMETERS ........................................... 3-7 3.4 STREAM MITIGATION AND MITIGATION BANKING SCORES ........... 3-21 3.5 FISH SURVEYS AND IBI DEVELOPMENT ............................................... 3-22 3.6 LEESBURG USA AND USSR DATA SUMMARY...................................... 3-23 4 REVIEW OF BENTHIC PROTOCOLS, METRICS, AND INDICATORS .......... 4-1 5 INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT ................................................................................ 5-1 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Trail Management
    Appendix D Additional Reference Material Appendix D contains the following reference documents that relate to the Park Authority’s Guide to Trail Management • FCPA Policy 101.3­ Greenways, Including Stream Valleys • FCPA Policy 103.2­ Trails Fairfax County Park Authority Policy Manual – December 1998 Policy 101.3 Greenways, Including Stream Valleys The Fairfax County Park Authority shall provide leadership for establishment and management of an integrated network of Greenways within the County to conserve open space, to protect sensitive environmental and cult ural resources including wildlife habitat, riparian corridors, water quality, archaeological and historic sites and aesthetic values, to control flooding and erosion, and to provide continuity of non-motorized access between places where citizens and visitors live, work and play. As defined in the Countywide Policy Plan, Greenways are "linear open space corridors which include and connect, parks and recreation sites, areas of significant and sensitive ecological and heritage (cultural) resource value, wildlife habitats, riparian corridors and Countywide trails with each other and with residential communities, employment and commercial areas and transit destinations. Designated Greenways may be comprised of one or several components which will provide the desired resource protection and/or continuity of non-motorized access to destinations throughout the County. They may be established along natural corridors such as Environmental Quality Corridors, along scenic roadways, urban sidewalks and plazas, or other natural or landscaped courses for pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian passage. In addition to publicly accessible parklands and trails, Greenways may also incorporate private open space managed for the protection of significant natural and heritage (cult ural) resources under voluntary agreements with property owners." The Park Authority shall coordinate the establishment of the Countywide network of Greenways in accordance with the following guidelines: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Road Ready E-Brochure Summer Update
    2017 Road Ready e‐Brochure Summer Update A Comprehensive Electronic Guide to Major Road Construction (SHA photo: Aerial view of the MD 195 (Carroll Avenue) Bridge over Sligo Creek and Sligo Creek Parkway rehabilitation project in Takoma Park, Montgomery County.) Know your Road The Maryland Department of Transportation (MDOT) crews maintain 17,824 lane miles of the state’s highways and toll roads. If you observe an issue on a State-maintained road, we remind Marylanders that there are three types of state-maintained roads in Maryland: Click here for a rundown of which agency maintains what road. Interstate sign Roads with US numbered routes Roads with MD numbered routes. If you don’t see one of these signs on your road, you probably do NOT live on a state-maintained road. Work Zone Safety is in Your Hands Work Zone Safety In addition to the major projects listed, you may also encounter mobile or short-term work zones. Always expect the unexpected, pay extra close attention and drive slowly through any work zone. Whether it’s a tree trimming operation or a bridge project, be aware when orange is there: Think Orange (the color of construction equipment and signs), stay alert and slow down. Everyone is at risk. Real-time travel information is available for free by using Maryland 511. Motorists should call 511, 1-855- GOMD511 or visit www.md511.org for current travel information. Sign up to personalize travel route information through MY511 on the website. Remember to use 511 safely – Maryland law prohibits hand- held mobile phone use and texting while driving.
    [Show full text]
  • DC Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring Report 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents Dear Friends of the River
    WAter DC Citizen Science Water Quality Monitoring Report 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents Dear Friends of the River, On behalf of Anacostia Riverkeeper, I am pleased to share with you our first Annual DC Citizen Science Volunteer Water Quality Report on Bacteria in District Waters. This report focuses on 2020 water quality results from all three District watersheds: the Anacostia River, Potomac River, and Rock Creek. The water quality data we collected is critical for understanding the health of the Anacostia River and District waters; as it serves as a gauge for safe recreation potential as well as a continuing assessment of efforts in the Methodology District of Columbia to improve the overall health of 7 our streams and waterways. As a volunteer program, we are dependent on those who offer time out of their daily schedule to work 8 Anacostia River with us and care for the water quality. With extreme gratitude, we would like to thank all our volunteers and staff for the dedication, professionalism, and enthusiasm to execute this program and to provide high quality data to the public. Additionally, support 10 Potomac River from our partner organizations was crucial to running this program, so we would like to extend an additional thanks to staff at Audubon Naturalist Society, Potomac Riverkeeper, and Rock Creek 12 Rock Creek Conservancy. We hope you find this annual report a good guide to learning more about our local DC waterways. We believe that clean water is a benefit everyone should experience, one that starts with consistent and 14 Discussion publicly available water quality data.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory: Piney River, Shenandoah National Park
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1999 Revised 2006 Piney River Shenandoah National Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Piney River Shenandoah National Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Cultural Landscapes Inventory – General Information The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI) is a database containing information on the historically significant landscapes within the National Park System. This evaluated inventory identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved inventory records when all required data fields are entered, the park superintendent concurs with the information, and the landscape is determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places through a consultation process or is otherwise managed as a cultural resource through a public planning process. The CLI, like the List of Classified Structures (LCS), assists the National Park Service (NPS) in its efforts to fulfill the identification and management requirements associated with Section 110(a) of the National Historic Preservation Act, National Park Service Management Policies (2001), and Director’s Order #28: Cultural Resource Management. Since launching the CLI nationwide, the NPS, in response to the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA), is required to report information that respond to NPS strategic plan accomplishments. Two goals are associated with the CLI: 1) increasing the number of certified cultural landscapes (1b2B); and 2) bringing certified cultural landscapes into good condition (1a7).
    [Show full text]