Second Errata

SecondEnvironmental Errata Statement PlanningAddendum Application to & SupportingChapter 8: Documents Nant Llesg Ecology and Nature PlanningConservation Ref: 13/0732/MIN Surface Mine Incorporating Land Remediation NantLlesgSurfaceMine

IncorporatingLandRemediation

PlanningReference:13/0732/MIN SecondErrata The following corrections are made to the planning application and supporting documents submitted for the Nant Llesg Surface Mine, Incorporating Land Remediation (Planning Reference: 13/0732/MIN):

1. PlanningStatement

1.1. Chapter10ͲCoalWashingPlantandAncillaryWaterRecyclingFacility

1.1.1. Thewording“AsidentifiedintheNeedCasesetoutatChapterError!Reference sourcenotfound.ofthisstatement,…”atparagraph10.1onpage62ofChapter10, shouldread“AsidentifiedintheNeedCasesetoutatChapter15ofthis statement,…”.

2. EnvironmentalStatement

2.1. Chapter5ͲSocialImpactAssessment

2.1.1. Table5.1under"Magnitudeofchangesinlocaltraining/retrainingopportunities"in the2ndcolumn:replacereferencesto"employment"with"education". 2.1.2. Paragraph5.64,2ndsentence:replace"BasedonCensus2001results,therewere some6,270workingagedresidentsand3,570economicallyactiveresidentsinthis area,"with"BasedonCensus2011results,thereweresome6,500workingaged residentsand3,600economicallyactiveresidentsinthisarea,". 2.1.3. Paragraph5.87Ͳdeletetruncatedsentence. 2.1.4. Paragraph5.103,lastsentence:replace"6,000residents"with"6,500residents". 2.1.5. Table5.11,2ndcolumn:replace"14,000"with"6,500". 2.1.6. Paragraph5.134,lastsentence:addtheword"impact"after"beneficial". 2.1.7. Paragraph5.139,2ndsentence:replace"14,000"with"6,500". 2.1.8. AppendixMA/NL/ES/A05/002:

x Table 1, Row 2: replace “2012” with “2011”. x Table 2, Row 1: replace “aged 16 – 64” with “aged 16 – 74”.

2.2. Chapter12–AirQuality&Dust

2.2.1. Paragraph12.96statesthatthedatacapturefor2012was72%forPM10and70%for

PM2.5.Theseshouldread89%and84%forPM10andPM2.5respectively.Theverified data is attached as Appendix MA/NL/PA/A12/001 of the Second Addendum to the EnvironmentalStatement.

2.2.2. Minorerrorstothemodelledbaselineaveragedailydustdepositionateachreceptor, averagedoveraweek,werepresentedinTable12.10oftheES.Thecorrectdatais presented below. As this average data is not used in the impact assessment, these errorshavenomaterialeffectontheconclusionsoftheES.

Table 12.10: Baseline - Predicted Dust Deposition at Residential and Commercial Receptors

Receptor Average daily dust deposition, averaged over one week (number on mg/m2/day Drawing MA/NL/ES/12/003) St Athan* CDP Cwm Nant (1) 0.6 1.4 Lower Row, Bute Town (2) 0.5 1.2 The Rhymney House, Llechryd (3) 0.5 1.2 Sand Crest Lodge, Rhymney (4) 0.8 2.0 26 Glan Yr Afon, Rhymney (5) 0.9 2.3 3 Old Brewery Lane, Rhymney (6) 1.2 2.9 Valletta Lodge, Hill Road, Pontlottyn (7) 6.6 5.6 Bali Hai, Bryhyfryd (8) 7.2 5.8 72 Pontlottyn Road, Fochriw (9) 10.0 8.5 Cae Glas Fochriw (10) 10.2 11.0 Ty Nazareth, Guest Street Fochriw (11) 8.7 9.8 Blaen Carno Farmhouse (12) 0.3 0.4 Gypsy Castle (13) 0.2 0.4 Commercial Receptors Heads of Valley Industrial Estate (14) 1.2 3.2 Heads of Valley Industrial Estate (15) 1.8 4.4 Capital Valley Eco Park (16) 3.9 5.5 EAL for protection of public amenity: 80 mg/m2/day averaged over a week.