1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1708 Filed 06/26/17 Page 1 of 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 IN RE: CAPACITORS ANTITRUST MASTER FILE NO. 3:14-cv-03264-JD LITIGATION 15 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO 16 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: DEFENDANT NITSUKO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 17 ALL INDIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Law Offices Final Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice as to Approval of Settlement with Defendant Nitsuko Electronics Corporation; COTCHETT, PITRE & Case No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD MCCARTHY, LLP Case 3:14-cv-03264-JD Document 1708 Filed 06/26/17 Page 2 of 17 1 This matter has come before the Court to determine whether there is any cause why this 2 Court should not enter Final Judgment as to Defendant Nitsuko Electronics Corporation 3 (“Nitsuko”). The Court, having reviewed the settlement agreement between Plaintiffs Michael 4 Brooks, CAE Sound, Steve Wong, Toy-Knowlogy Inc., AGS Devices, Ltd., J&O Electronics, 5 Nebraska Dynamics, Inc., Angstrom, Inc., MakersLED, In Home Tech Solutions, Inc., 6 individually and on behalf of the Indirect Purchaser Class they seek to represent, on the one hand, 7 and Nitusko, on the other, dated March 29, 2016 (the “Settlement Agreement”); Indirect 8 Purchasers’ Motion for Final Approval of Settlements with Defendants NEC TOKIN, Nitsuko 9 and Okaya; the pleadings and other papers on file in this action; and the statements of counsel 10 and the parties, including at the July 6, 2017 Fairness Hearing, hereby finds no just reason to 11 delay the entry of Final Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
[Show full text]