The Young Israel of Bal Harbour

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Young Israel of Bal Harbour A History OF THE YOUNG ISRAEL OF BAL HARBOUR Written by Mali Schwartz A History of The Young Israel of Bal Harbour: Building Our Future TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword by Rabbi Moshe Gruenstein .......................................2 Introduction by Mali Schwartz....................................................3 The History of the Young Israel National Organization ...........4 The Township of Surfside ............................................................5 The Founding of the Young Israel of Bal Harbour, Bay Harbor Islands, Surfside and Indian Creek .....................6 The History of the Jews of Florida ..............................................9 The Young Israel of Bal Harbour “Pioneers”............................10 The Young Israel of Bal Harbour Spiritual Leaders: Rabbi Moshe & Rebbetzin Rena Gruenstein ........................18 The Jews of South Florida ..........................................................20 The Latin American Connection ..............................................20 Anti-Semitism in Florida ...........................................................22 The Village of Bal Harbour ........................................................23 Paving the Way: The Efforts of Rabbi Sholom & Rebbetzin Chani Lipskar ...........................26 And the Story Continues… .......................................................26 The Next Generation of Young Israel of Bal Harbour Leaders .....................................33 The Bay Harbor Islands ..............................................................38 Building for the Future ...............................................................39 Conclusion ...................................................................................41 Acknowledgements .....................................................................44 Photo Collages.............................................................................45 1 Foreword ____________________________ As we stroll down memory lane, we remember so many individuals who were instrumental in bringing our Young Israel to where we are today. Their hard work and selfless dedication is a testimony to their commitment to the enhancement of Judaism and the Jewish community. It is through their efforts that we begin a new chapter in the Young Israel legacy, which will bring a new beautiful edifice of Torah & Tefillah to our community. Those who have shown so much sacrifice in the past will now reap the benefits of the present and future for they are truly the builders of our Shul. We thank them for all they have done. May they merit to fulfill the verse in Isaiah (54:13) “That all your children will be students of G-d and your children (banaich) will have peace.” Says the Talmud, rather read it bonaich (your builders) will have peace. May you who are building this community only see peace and prosperity all the days of your life. Rabbi Moshe Gruenstein 2 Introduction ____________________________ We want to pay tribute to the Young Israel Congregation members who have helped to lay the groundwork that has led to the creation of a thriving, dynamic synagogue community – one which serves the communities of Bal Harbour, Bay Harbor Islands, Surfside and Indian Creek. Young Israel members – some who were here from the beginning, when the idea of having a Shomer Shabbos Modern Orthodox community was just a dream – have helped to create a strong kehilla. As the Young Israel prepares to build a new structure to accommodate the ongoing growth of the synagogue community, now is the time to share the stories of what these members have encountered along the way. We hope that their stories will help the reader to gain a deeper understanding of the events that have helped to shape the Young Israel community. Our Young Israel officially began in March 1999. Many hurdles have been overcome during the 14 years that the Young Israel has been in existence. But let’s start at the beginning… Mali Schwartz Although we have made every effort to include everyone who has played a pivotal role in the growth of the Young Israel, we apologize if we unintentionally left anyone out of this journal. Please note that the order in which Young Israel members are listed in each of the chapters is not in alphabetical order but in the order of when these members joined the Young Israel. 3 The History of the Young Israel National Organization _________________ What led a small group of men who lived in Surfside in the late 1990s to want a Young Israel in their community? What measures did they take to achieve their goal? To help answer this question we should first take a look at the role of the Young Israel movement in North America – the circumstances which led to its creation in 1912, and the forces and events which have influenced its subsequent development. The conditions under which North American Jewry lived during the early decades of the twentieth century were not conducive to the practice of a religious lifestyle. Because practically all jobs required work on Saturday, Shabbos observance was rare and typically required extraordinary sacrifice. The goal of the Young Israel movement was to broaden the appeal of synagogue services to American-raised Jewish youth. Jewish youth of that era generally avoided the synagogue, attending only when required by family custom. To counteract the loss of young Jewish hearts and minds to Jewish belief and practice as we understand it today, Young Israel was founded. Taking the First Step… Understanding why there was a desire to become affiliated with the Young Israel leads us to ask other questions. What were some of the circumstances that had to be faced before founding a Young Israel in the town of Surfside? What does Surfside offer its residents? How has this small town that is part of Miami- Dade County changed over time? Reading about the description of Surfside found on the township’s website can provide some insight into these questions. 4 The Township of Surfside _______________ The Town of Surfside is a beautiful oceanfront community located in the tropical paradise of South Florida. It was incorporated in 1935 through the signatures of only 35 people, members of the Surf Club, a private club in town. They gave the town its name and a loan of about $30,000 to get the town started. Originally the area was nothing more than about a square mile of land with about fifty residents. It was after World War II that the town saw a significant boost in residency, with individuals migrating to Surfside from every place imaginable, attracted to the beautiful beach and the strong sense of civic duty displayed by those who controlled the town. Today, Surfside is home to approximately 5,800 residents and includes a tranquil and attractive residential neighborhood, multi-family condominium and apartment buildings, a traditional “home town” business district as well as tourist facilities that welcome visitors year round. All of the homes, apartments, condominiums, hotels and resorts in Surfside are within walking distance of world class shopping, fantastic public beaches, a number of public parks, playgrounds, tennis courts, and recreational facilities including a new Community Center and Aquatics Facility. The Town of Surfside encompasses the area from 87th Terrace to 96th Street, and it is situated between the City of Miami Beach to the south and the Village of Bal Harbour to the north. Surfside has earned a truly superb reputation as a family community and destination, offering a wide range of accommodations, resort facilities, shopping opportunities and leisure activities. Surfside is also within easy range of all of South Florida’s world- renowned attractions. 5 Surfside has about a mile of public beach that can rival any beach in the world. The beaches are peaceful, clean, pleasant, safe, and free of commercial intrusion. There are many kosher restaurants in Surfside’s business and commercial district, as well as a kosher grocery store and a great variety of other stores and services. Hotels and resorts provide accommodations for all tastes and budgets. The Founding of the Young Israel of Bal Harbour _________________ Allen & Chana Henya Schloss and Stephen & Sharon Opert remain close friends until today. Allen and Stephen, who moved into the resort community of Surfside in 1985 and 1996 respectively, remember the days before there was a Young Israel in the area. Stephen recalls that there were only two synagogues in the entire area – The Shul of Bal Harbour, founded in 1981, and Mogen David Congregation of Surfside, a shteibel where services were held in the living room on 9348 Harding Avenue in Surfside. Rabbi Isaac David Vine received a blessing from the Lubavitcher Rebbe to become the spiritual leader of Mogen David, which was founded in the late 1960s. The Mogen David had the potential to expand and attract more people to its services, but when Rabbi Vine passed away in the mid 1970s, his Rebbetzin, Molly Vine, took over. Eli Cohen, a Sephardic member of Mogen David and Rebbetzin Vine’s right hand man, wanted to change the Mogen David to a Sepharadi congregation. Gradually, the Mogen David began to lose its numbers as its members began davening in The Shul of Bal Harbor. 6 The spark of an idea to have a Modern Orthodox synagogue with nusach Ashkenaz as an alternative place of worship was entertained by Bernie Lack, a retired war veteran, Stephen Opert, a pharmacist, and Allen Schloss, a real estate businessman, in the latter part of 1997. These men knew that the Mogen David was
Recommended publications
  • United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey 970 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102
    NEWS United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey 970 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Ralph J. Marra, Jr., Acting U.S. Attorney More Information? Call the Assistant U.S. Attorney or other contact listed below to see if more information is available. News on the Internet: News Releases, related documents and advisories are posted short-term at our website, along with links to our archived releases at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. Go to: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/ Assistant U.S. Attorneys stad0211.rel THOMAS J. EICHER FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 609-989-0569 Feb 11, 2009 RACHAEL A. HONIG 973-645-2777 Former Second in Command at Kushner Companies Sentenced to 38 Months in Prison for Conspiring to Defraud the United States (More) Public Affairs Office 856-757-5233 http://www.njusao.org J. Gregory Reinert, PAO Breaking News (NJ) http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/index.html NEWARK – The former second-in-command at the Kushner Companies was sentenced to 38 months in federal prison and ordered to pay a $100,000 fine today for his conviction on charges of conspiring to defraud the United States and aiding and assisting in the filing of false tax returns, Acting U.S. Attorney Ralph J. Marra, Jr. announced. U.S. District Judge Jose L. Linares, who presided over the trial, also ordered Richard Stadtmauer, 49, of Livingston, to pay the total costs of the prosecution totaling approximately $20,000 and to serve three years of supervised release upon the completion of his prison term.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Days in July That Rocked Indiana Pence’S Pursuit of Veep Nod, Holcomb’S Win at GOP Central Committee Were Bold Moves Toward November History by BRIAN A
    V22, N15 Thursday, Nov. 17, 2016 Four days in July that rocked Indiana Pence’s pursuit of veep nod, Holcomb’s win at GOP Central Committee were bold moves toward November history By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – When filing back through time to make sense of the Gov. Mike Pence and Lt. Gov. Eric Holcomb sensational Nov. 8 election that catapulted celebrate their Election Day victories that Gov. Mike Pence were forged by four momentus days in into global power July, including Trump’s visit to Indianapolis and capped Eric and Westfield. Holcomb’s unprec- edented rise in Indi- Republican presidential ticket with ana, it comes down Donald Trump. Except it was not fait to four days in July accompli. That wouldn’t happen until when the historic Friday, July 15. and fateful dramas unfolded. And on Monday July 25, after 22 Indiana Republi- On July 14, we witnessed cable breaking news can Central Committee members migrated back to Indiana reports of Gov. and Mrs. Pence disembarking on a charter from the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, the flight from Indianapolis to Teterboro, N.J., in what most thought was an obvious sign he was about to join the Continued on page 3 2016 winners and losers By MARK SOUDER FORT WAYNE – Every election results in individual and categorical winners and losers that impact the longer- term future of politics. Here are a few of my selections. Indiana winner: The Pence/Coats establishment. “The very worst choice you can It directed the quasi-slating of the victorious state ticket: Todd make is to opt out as a citizen, to Young for Senate, in part by give in to the cynicsm, the moving Eric Holcomb out and into position to become gover- despair and the anger.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Timeline 1970S and Before
    NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission- A Historical Timeline By Joseph Donohue, Deputy Director (Updated 10/2/17) 1970s and Before October 16, 1964- Governor Richard Hughes enacts New Jersey’s first lobbying law (Chapter 207). It requires any lobbyist who makes $500 or more in three months or spends that much to influence legislation to register with the Secretary of State. Trenton attorney John Heher, representing American Mutual Insurance Alliance of Chicago, becomes the state’s first registered lobbyist.1 New Jersey Education Association, historically one of the most powerful lobbyists in the capitol, registers for the first time on December 15, 1964.2 September 1, 1970- The interim report of the bipartisan New Jersey Election Law Revision Commission concludes “stringent disclosure requirements on every aspect of political financing must be imposed and enforce at every election level….If there were full public disclosure and publication of all campaign contributions and expenditures during a campaign, the voters themselves could better judge whether a candidate has spent too much.” It recommends creation of a 5-member Election Law Enforcement Commission and a tough enforcement strategy: “withhold the issuance of a certificate of election to a candidate who has not complied with the provisions of this act.”3 November 13, 1971- A new lobbying law (Chapter 183) takes effect, repealing the 1964 act and transferring all jurisdiction to the Attorney General. It requires lobbyists to wear badges in the Statehouse for the first time and file quarterly reports that list the bills they are supporting or opposing. April 7, 1972- Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures for federal candidates.4 June 17, 1972- Break-in occurs at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Politics: : عوﺿوﻣﻟا مﺳا Motives Behind Trump's Decision on ﻋﻧوان اﻟﻣوﺿوع : Jerusalem 1
    Domestic Politics: : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϡγ΍ Motives behind Trump¶s Decision on : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ϥ΍ϭϧϋ Jerusalem 12/12/2017 : έηϧϟ΍ΦϳέΎΗ ΔϣΩϘΗϣϟ΍ΕΎγ΍έΩϟ΍ϭΙΎΣΑϸϟϝΑϘΗγϣϟ΍ίϛέϣ : ΏΗΎϛϟ΍ϡγ΍ : ωϭοϭϣϟ΍ 9/25/2021 7:31:01 PM 1 / 2 US President Donald Trump, in a December 6, 2017 speech, announced the United States¶officially recognizes Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and stated that this is a long overdue step to advance the peace process and work towards a lasting agreement. He also said that the announcement marks the beginning of a new approach to conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, and that the United States will support a two-state solution if agreed to by both sides. But although he noted that recognition serves efforts to establish peace and stability in the Middle East, Trump failed to specify the area that Israel can control in Jerusalem, something which could, theoretically, represent a chance for making east Jerusalem a capital for a future independent Palestinian state.Trump made the decision despite opposition from the United States¶closest allies who warned against its consequences. Before the announcement was made, Jordan¶s King Abdullah II reportedly warned Trump ³personally´against the dangerous repercussions on the stability and security of the region. Saudi King Salman also warned against the decision. Additionally, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar, Turkey as well as United States¶European allies, including France and Germany, immediately condemned Trump¶s decision. Because it runs against international consensus about Jerusalem and broke with a long-standing tradition held by former US Administrations, questions were raised about the motives of Trump¶s decision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Planning the World's Most Visible Urban Redevelopment Project
    The Politics of Planning the World's Most Visible Urban Redevelopment Project Lynne B. Sagalyn THREE YEARS after the terrorist attack of September 11,2001, plans for four key elements in rebuilding the World Trade Center (WC) site had been adopted: restoring the historic streetscape, creating a new public transportation gate- way, building an iconic skyscraper, and fashioning the 9/11 memorial. Despite this progress, however, what ultimately emerges from this heavily argued deci- sionmakmg process will depend on numerous design decisions, financial calls, and technical executions of conceptual plans-or indeed, the rebuilding plan may be redefined without regard to plans adopted through 2004. These imple- mentation decisions will determine whether new cultural attractions revitalize lower Manhattan and whether costly new transportation investments link it more directly with Long Island's commuters. These decisions will determine whether planned open spaces come about, and market forces will determine how many office towers rise on the site. In other words, a vision has been stated, but it will take at least a decade to weave its fabric. It has been a formidable challenge for a city known for its intense and frac- tious development politics to get this far. This chapter reviews the emotionally charged planning for the redevelopment of the WTC site between September 2001 and the end of 2004. Though we do not yet know how these plans will be reahzed, we can nonetheless examine how the initial plans emerged-or were extracted-from competing ambitions, contentious turf battles, intense architectural fights, and seemingly unresolvable design conflicts. World's Most Visible Urban Redevelopment Project 25 24 Contentious City ( rebuilding the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Source:. Auditreferral
    I' .. .. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ' ,999 E Street,'N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463'. .. FIRST GENEW,COUNSEL'S REPORT AUDIT'REFERRAL: 01-11 . AUDIT REFERRAL DATE: June 8,2001 I. DATE ACTIVATED: October 24,2001 EXP~RATIONOF STATUTE OF'LIMITATIONS: . December 5,2002 -.August 17,2005' STAFF MEMBERS: Albert Veldhuyzen ' . Michelle E. Abellera r. I I .. .. SOURCE:. AUDITREFERRAL ' RESPONDENTS: Bill Bradley for President, Inc. and TheodoreV. Wells, as Treasurer 135 .MontgomeryAssociates .. .. Avenue Associates 836 .. .. AbbyJo Ages . .. ,. ,.-I-..* ,.-I-..* 6-j BP Developers, L.P. .. ...-_, ' .. 5' .A . ' Brick Building Associates; L.P. -... .. ...::- ... .--l' .. Bruckner Plaza Associates ' . .... :.. e: :: .:.j ._:_, :. ... -.. Colfax Manor, L.P. ..' C" .. .. ....a , ... 'a .._. _.I. .-. (?! :*-! , ... - College Park Associates, L.P. .-. r--.._.I .._ - ' [=I "' .Fz L. Constantine Village Associates . -z.. --- t. -.: -. , . rP.-; * .- Dara Building Associates, L.P. , . .. East Brunswick Corporate Center Edgewater Apartments Associates, L.P. Bernard Eichler .. Elmwood V. Associates, L.P. .. .. .. Jefiey Freireich ' . The statute of limitations period for the.corporate contributions and contributions in the name of another is ' . December 5,2002 - August 17, 2005 reflecting the earliest and latest contributions made to Lautenberg 2000 on . December 5, 1997 and to DNC Services CorporatiodDNC on August 17,.2000. Within the context of Bradley for . President, Inc.., the earliest statute of limitations date.is June 16,2004, as a result of contribution checks dated June 16and 17, 1999. .. I Audit Referral 0 1 - 1 1 First General Counsel's Report Page '2 Melvin Gebroe . Barbara Gellert George Gellert General Green Village Associates .. .. Bert Ghavami .. .I' I Stuart Gladstone Glen Ellen Associates, L.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Vincent's Plan Faces Obstacles
    TOP STORIES REPORT Chinatown’s uphill REAL ESTATE climb continues, Top office leases, five years after building sales terrorist attack in 2006; more PAGE 2 ® PAGES 19-35 Designer struggles for spotlight in his make-or-break VOL. XXIII, NO. 8 WWW.NEWYORKBUSINESS.COM FEBRUARY 19-25, 2007 PRICE: $3.00 fall season PAGE 3 Bankers Oscar-winning actor Jamie Foxx may be aim to working on a book PAGE 6 buy NY Alair Townsend on how to fix city’s sick assets retiree health plan PAGE 13 They make pitch Planning chief for privatization; Burden sets rules only MTA says no for garment district, UP AGAINST THE WALL: Former floor trader Linda BY ANNE MICHAUD Coney Island McBurney hopes to find a INSIDER, PAGE 15 job with a money investment bankers are blitzing management firm. the Spitzer administration with proposals to sell state assets to pri- BUSINESS LIVES buck ennis vate firms, as investors seek to buy NIGHT CRAWLERS EXCHANGING PLACES toll roads, bridges and even Off- Track Betting. The strange world and Bankers are making the rounds vampire hours of club at the Thruway Authority,the Em- PAGE 39 promoters Stranded by Street, pire State Development Corp., the state Department of Transporta- tion and the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey. They ex-traders seek rebirth seek to capitalize on statements by the new governor that he is open to public-private partnerships. “buy” and “sell” orders. New York’s stock and commodity Meanwhile, Gov. Eliot Spitzer Electronic markets Not anymore. Over the past exchanges operate, is also elimi- has ratcheted up the pressure on his erode a way of life; couple of years, as firms increas- nating hundreds of jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Kushner Companies Questionable Business Practices Are Another Dent for the Trump Administration
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Capstones Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism Fall 12-15-2017 Kushner Companies Questionable Business Practices are Another Dent for the Trump Administration Teddy Grant How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gj_etds/259 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Kushner Companies Questionable Business Practices are Another Dent for the Trump Administration By: Teddy Grant The 24-hour news cycle has been dominated by President Trump’s policy decisions, tweets and the investigation into his campaign ties with Russia, but businesses connected to the president and his family continue to raise concerns about the wall between the White House and the president’s private businesses. While investigators from special prosecutor Robert Mueller zero in on Jared Kushner's role in the alleged collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign, the real estate company of President Trump's son-in-law is mired in increasingly serious financial and legal problems which could upend the business. Examining Kushner is to look at his family’s real estate empire in New York, New Jersey and the surrounding areas. Kushner Companies, the real estate development firm, handles billions of dollars’ worth of residential and commercial properties throughout the northeast. The company founded by real estate developer Charles Kushner—Jared’s father—presided over some of the biggest deals in real estate.
    [Show full text]
  • C. Corporate Contributions...F
    NOV 5 '2003 RECEIVED ..- F E DE R AL EL E C T ION' BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION SECRETARIATCOPQMlSSlOW . ZN?.NOU -5 P 12: 30 In the Matter of Bill Bradley for President, Inc. and. Theodore V. Wells, as Treasurer; Kushner Companies and MUR 5279 40 Associated Partnerships; 4 1 Individual Respondents GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT ## 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Actions Recommended. ........................................................ 2 II. Background Factual Analysis. ................................................ 3 A. Contributions to the Bradley Committee. .............................. 6 III. Legal Framework. .............................................................. ' 11 22 A. ,Contributions in the Name of Another.. ................................ 11 23 B. Partnership Contributions................................................... 12 '. .' 24 C. Corporate Contributions.. .................................................. 12 ... 25 D. Corporate Facilitation. ....................................................... 13 26 E. Conduit Liability. ............................................................ 13 .. 27 F. Excessive Contnbutions. .................................................... 13 28 Iv. Legal Analysis. ....................................................................... 14 29 A. Partner Liability.. ............................................................. 14 30 1. Partnership Contributions.. ........................................... i . 14 31 a. Non-Partner Contributions........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Order As the Foundational Paradox of the Trump Presidency
    Stanford Law Review Online Volume 73 June 2021 SYMPOSIUM ESSAY Law and Order as the Foundational Paradox of the Trump Presidency Trevor George Gardner* Abstract. This Essay scrutinizes the feuding between the Trump White House and various federal law enforcement agencies, concurrent with criminal lawbreaking in the Trump Administration, in an effort to extend scholarly understanding of the relationship between law-and-order politics and popular regard for rule-of-law principles. Sociolegal scholars have long argued that the politics advanced under the banner of “law and order” reduces the whole of the criminal–legal order to minority violent crime. In doing so, these politics stoke white racial anxieties regarding one or more racial minority groups. But under the Trump regime, law-and-order politics exhibited an additional benefit to its purveyors: obfuscation of the threat to the criminal– legal order posed by the very purveyors of these politics. This is to say that the criminal offending of the Trump campaign and Administration would likely have been more politically damaging to the Administration had much of the public not been fixated on Trump’s allegation of a rising tide of minority violent crime. Moreover, this same reductive logic has badly damaged the political standing of Black Lives Matter. It has often reduced the Black Lives Matter organization—effectively, a rule-of-law campaign targeting extra-legal police violence—to the limited instances of violent crime found at the margins of Black Lives Matter protest activity. * Professor of Law, Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. This Essay was written for the 2021 Policing, Race, and Power Symposium hosted by the Stanford Law Review and the Stanford Black Law Students Association, and for the cross-journal Reckoning and Reformation Symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey 970 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102
    NEWS United States Department of Justice U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey 970 Broad Street, Seventh Floor Newark, New Jersey 07102 Christopher J. Christie, U.S. Attorney More Information? Call the Assistant U.S. Attorney or other contact listed below to see if more information is available. News on the Internet: News Releases, related documents and advisories are posted short-term at our website, along with links to our archived releases at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. Go to: http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/ Contact: bekr0214.rel Michael Drewniak FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 973-645-2888 Feb 14, 2008 Partner of Accounting Firm Used by Kushner Admits Conspiring to Defraud the United States and Aiding in Filing of False Tax Returns (More) Public Affairs Office 973-645-2888 http://www.njusao.org Michael Drewniak, PAO Breaking News (NJ) http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nj/press/index.html NEWARK – The head tax partner of an accounting firm involved in a series of real-estate partnerships controlled by Charles Kushner pleaded guilty today to conspiring to defraud the United States by aiding and assisting the filing of false tax returns, U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie announced. Stanley Bekritsky, 58, of Teaneck, a certified public accountant, who at the time of the offense was a partner at a Roseland accounting firm that specialized in servicing the real-estate industry, entered his guilty plea before Judge Jose L. Linares to a one-count Superseding Indictment. Bekritsky’s trial was scheduled to begin yesterday, but was delayed due to plea negotiations.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Kushner
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION WASHINGTON, D.C. __________________________________________ ) FRB Dkt. No. 05-010-B-HC In the Matter of: ) 05-010-CMP-HC ) 05-010-B-I THE NORCROWN TRUST ) 05-010-CMP-I ) 05-010-E-I ) FDIC-04-224e & FDIC-04-223k CHARLES KUSHNER, an institution-affiliated ) party of The NorCrown Trust, and a former ) Joint Orders to Cease and Desist, institution- affiliated party of NorCrown Bank, ) of Assessment of Civil Money Livingston, New Jersey ) Penalties, and of Prohibition, and (an insured state nonmember bank) ) Order Under the Bank Holding ) Company Act, Issued Upon __________________________________________) Consent WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 8(b) and 8(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as amended (the “FDI Act”)(12 U.S.C. §§ 1818(b) & (e)), and section 8(b) of the Bank Holding Company Act, as amended (the “BHC Act”)(12 U.S.C. §1847(b)), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board of Governors”), and, pursuant to the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. § 1817(j)(16)), and sections 8(e), and 8(i) of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. §§ 1818(e) & (i)), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) issues by consent this Joint Order to Cease and Desist, Order Assessing Civil Money Penalties, and Order of Prohibition (the “Joint Enforcement Orders”) against The NorCrown Trust, an unregistered bank holding company, which owns more than 99 percent of the voting shares of NorCrown Bank, Livingston, New Jersey, an insured state nonmember bank, and Charles Kushner, an institution-affiliated party of The NorCrown Trust who is the sole trustee of The NorCrown Trust, and a former institution-affiliated party of NorCrown Bank who was the chairman and a director of NorCrown Bank from June 1996 until July 2004, and who filed with the FDIC a notice under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]