Containers and World Trade
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
America's Authentic Mississippi River Experience
America’s Authentic Mississippi River Experience All aboard the Twilight Riverboat The Most Elegant River- boat in the last 100 years! PLUS The Spirit of Peoria Riverboat 4 Days / 3 Nights - August 16-19, 2021 TOUR INCLUDES: COST PER PERSON: Modern Motorcoach Transportation $999.00 double 3 Nights Lodging 3 Breakfasts Triple - $919.00 Single - $1299.00 2 Lunches Deposit: $100. at time of registration 2 Dinners Balance: Is due by June 15, 2021 2 Days Mississippi River Cruise Cancellation Protection: $75 per person due with your Riverboat Entertainment deposit and protects all monies (except the $75)in the event of cancellation for any reason, anytime prior to National Mississippi River Museum & Aquarium departure. Spirit of Peoria Paddlewheel Cruise Cancellation Without Protection: Cancel 45 Days Prior - Full Refund Luggage Handling Cancel 45- 14 days prior - $300.00 Charge All Tax & Tips on Included Meals Cancel Within 14 Days - 50% Refund Cancellation Protection is Recommended Call the Tour Coordinator 419-423-8496 Shoreline Charter & Tours Inc. 339 East Melrose Ave. P.O. Box 43075, Detroit, MI 48243 1-800-265-0818 Findlay, OH 45840 www.shorelinetours.com SAMPLE ITINERARY: Day 1 - A NEW tour begins with a travel day to LeClaire, Iowa home of the Twilight Riverboat, America’s Authentic Mississippi River Experience. Overnight in LeClaire, Iowa and dinner on your own. Day 2 - At 7:00 a.m. we’ll board the Riverboat Twilight, the Most Elegant Riverboat to be launched in the last 100 years! www.riverboattwilight.com The Twilight was designed as a replica of the lavish Victorian Steamboats of over a century ago. -
The River Steam Boat: a Ticking Time Bomb out of the Experience of The
The River Steam Boat: A Ticking Time Bomb Out of the experience of the early years of the river steam boat, there emerged two architectures of steam-engine design and building. The first and for some years the predominant one was that provided by Boulton and Watt, with their low-pressure condensing steam engine. This was the architecture followed by Robert Fulton with his early success on the Hudson estuary. However, it was less than a decade after Fulton’s successful trip up the Hudson that steam engines based on designs using high pressure steam began to evolve. The result was largely to reshape the pattern of steamboat design and virtually eliminate the earlier low-pressure practices of Fulton, Boulton and Watt. The development of the high-pressure steam engine with its attendant steam boiler was governed almost entirely by practical considerations. The advantages of the simple, compact, low-cost high pressure engine over the low-pressure engine with its complicated condensing apparatus, greater size and weight, and heavy requirements of condensing water were clearly apparent and appropriate to American conditions. These conditions were (1) scarcity of capital and skilled labor, (2) scarcity of repair facilities and (3) limited scale of operation. All of these conditions, at one time or another, contributed to the fateful disasters that followed. Although explosions were by no means confined to boilers generating steam at high pressure, it was with this class of boiler that this type of operating hazard appeared in its most destructive and spectacular form. Every high-pressure boiler was in operation a storehouse of concentrated energy in the form of water and steam at high temperature confined under pressures ranging from 30 to 150 psi [i.e., pounds per square inch] and upward. -
Riverboat Site Selection Lesley Johnson Ph.D
Riverboat Site Selection Lesley Johnson Ph.D. Student William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration University of Nevada, Las Vegas and John Bowen, Ph.D. Associate Professor William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration University of Nevada, Las Vegas Abstract The riverboat casino is the most rapidly expanding segment of the gaming industry. Six states have already legalized riverboat/dockside gaming, and it is currently under review in at least 13 other states. The explosion of this gaming market is fueled by a combination of demand and supply side forces. Gaming, as a form of entertainment, is growing in popularity and acceptance. States experiencing hard economic times view riverboat gaming as a means to generate both non-tax receipts and tourism. Gaming companies seek to profit from this emerging market that has an apparently high demand and, initially, little competition. Competition, however, must continue at a level that allows a new entrant to gain a profitable share of the market. As competition in riverboat gaming continues to escalate, site selection will become an increasingly important factor in predicting the future success or failure of an operation. This paper looks at locational issues in Iowa and Illinois based on market and com petitive forces. A regression model, using financial data from the respective state's gam ing boards and demographic data from SCAN/US, was developed to relate the gross win and win per square foot (dependent variables) to the independent variable ofa population radius. The results were compared to a survey of gaming executives operating in the same states. Introduction Read My Lips -- No New Taxes. -
R.M. Lintner Riverboat Collection, Ca
Collection # M 0945, OM 0464 R.M. LINTNER RIVERBOAT COLLECTION, CA. 1860S–1990S (BULK CA. 1940S– 1960S) Collection Information Biographical/Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Series Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Kelly Gascoine February 13, 2008 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF Manuscript Materials: COLLECTION: 14 document cases, 1 card file box, 1 oversize folder Visual Materials: 32 boxes of photographs, 1 box of OVA size photographs, 1 folder of color photographs, 1 box of OVB size graphics, 2 folders of oversize graphics in flat file storage, 1 photograph album, 3 boxes of slides, 4 boxes of 4x5 acetate negatives COLLECTION Ca. 1860s–1990s (Bulk 1940s–1960s) DATES: PROVENANCE: Russell M. Lintner, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1992 RESTRICTIONS: Negatives and slides may be viewed only with the assistance of library staff. Films are not available, see Series 21 for explanation. COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1992.0232 NUMBER: NOTES: Indiana Historical Society R.M. Lintner Riverboat Collection Page 1 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL SKETCH Russell M. Linter was born 16 December 1904. A Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania resident, Lintner worked for Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation as a General Office Purchasing Department Expeditor. His interest in steamboats began in 1933 when he visited riverboats docked at the Monongahela River Wharf. Soon Lintner was traveling downriver on packet and supply ships and photographing riverboats. -
Container-‐On-‐Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel an Operating
Container-on-Barge for Illinois Fueled by Biodiesel An Operating Plan and Business Plan August 27, 2011 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Overview ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 2.0 Research/Investigation/Reports -------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 3.0 Lessons to Consider -------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 4.0 Inland Rivers Operations -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.1 Ownership -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.2 Towboats/Barges -------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 4.3 River Operations Modes -------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 4.4 The “Power Split” -------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 4.5 River Freight Pricing -------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 5.0 Designing Illinois COB -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1 Design Alternatives -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.1 Purchased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1.2 Leased -------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 5.1.3 Unit Tow -------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 6.0 Gulf COB – Cargo Flexibility -------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 7.0 COB Program -
Boats and Harbors Publication 9-06
® -and-har $4.00 ats bor bo s. c w. o w m BOATS & HARBORS w FIRST NOVEMBER ISSUE 2018 VOLUME 61 NO. 18 Covering The East Coast, Gulf Coast, West Coast And All Inland Waterways PH: (931) 484-6100 • FAX: (931) 456-2337 • Email: dmyers@boats-and-harbors Boats and Harbors Can Make Your Business Fat and Sassy Like A Turkey! Serving the Marine Industry Over 40 Years Chris Gonsoulin, Owner • (850) 255-5266 Otherwise........Your Business [email protected] • www.mbbrokerage.net Could End Upside Down Year: 1970 Without A Clucker! Dimensions: 100’ x 30’ x 9.7’ Caterpillar 3516 BOATS & HARBORS® P. O. Drawer 647 Main Engines Crossville, Tennessee 38557-0647 • USA 3,000HP 60KW Generator Sets Twin Disc MG 5600 6:1 ALL ALUMINUM Price: 1.50M REDUCED TO $985K! Year: 1981 Dimensions: 65’ x 24’ Engines: Detroit Diesel 12V-149 Horsepower: 1350HP 40KW Generator Sets Twin Disc Reverse/ Reduction Gears 5.0:1 PRICE: $549K! See Us on the WEB at www.boats-and-harbors.com BOATS & HARBORS PAGE 2 - FIRST NOVEMBER ISSUE 2018 WANT VALUE FOR YOUR ADVERTISING DOLLAR? www.FRANTZMARINE.com 320' x 60' x 28 Built 1995, 222' x 50' clear deck; U.S. flag. Class: Over 38 Years in the Marine Industry ABS +A1 +DP2. 280' L x 60' B x 24' D x 19' loaded draft. Built in 2004, US Flag, 2018 Workboat Edition - OSV’s - Tugs - Crewboats - Pushboats - Derrick Barges Class 1, +AMS, +DPS-2. Sub Ch. L & I. 203' x 50' clear deck. 272' L x 56' B x 18' D x 6' light draft x 15' loaded draft. -
Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments Between Ocean Port, Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning
Final Technical Report TNW2008-08 Research Project Agreement No. 61-5907 Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments between Ocean Port, Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning Kaori Fugisawa Anne Goodchild Research Associate Assistant Professor University of Washington University of Washington Eric Jessup Assistant Professor Washington State University A report prepared for Transportation Northwest (TransNow) University of Washington 135 More Hall, Box 352700 Seattle, Washington 98195-2700 July 2008 TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 2. GOVERNMENT ACCESSION NO. 3. RECIPIENT’S CATALOG NO. TNW2008-08 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5.REPORT DATE Improved Freight Modeling of Containerized Cargo Shipments between Ocean Port, July 2008 Handling Facility, and Final Market for Regional Policy and Planning 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 7. AUTHOR(S) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Anne Goodchild, Eric Jessup, Kaori Fugisawa TNW2008-08 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Transportation Northwest Regional Center X (TransNow) Box 352700, 129 More Hall University of Washington 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Seattle, WA 98195-2700 DTRS99-G-0010 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED United States Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation Final Research Report 400 Seventh St. S.W. 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Washington, D.C. 20590 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This study was conducted in cooperation with the University of Washington and the US Department of Transportation. ABSTRACT The proposed research will address an emerging need by local, state and regional transportation planners and policymakers to better understand the transportation characteristics, functions and dynamics of ocean port-to-handling facility and handling facility-to-final market freight movements. -
From Sternwheels to Stern Drives on the Columbia River
Shaver Many Shaver tugs, including the Port- SHAVER TRANSPORTATION: land and Sommer S, seen here assisting a bulk carrier on the FROM STERNWHEELS TO STERN DRIVES lower Willamette River, are equipped with line-handling cranes. Photo cour- ON THE COLUMBIA RIVER tesy of Shaver. SHAVER TRANSPORTATION OF PORTLAND, By Peter Marsh The wooden sternwheelers of that era Oregon has been a fixture on the Columbia were all driven hard and not built to last long. River since 1880 when George Washington Manzanillo, he After 15 years, Shaver’s top two boats were Shaver progressed from supplying wood to fuel steamboats scrapped and the steam engines were removed and re-used to operating his first sternwheeler. On the Hendersonin new boats carrying the same name. However, 1901 saw the began hauling freight to the downriver communities as far as launch of a sternwheel tug that proved to be the exception: the Clatskanie, Oregon. By 1893, Shaver and his two sons James lived a charmed life, despite numerous mishaps. It W. and George M. Shaver were ready to incorporate and open was sunk and rebuilt in 1912, rebuilt and re-engined in 1929, theirGeorge own boatyard. W. Shaver Sarah Dixon and sunk and raised again in 1950. They launched two luxurious passenger carriers named It survived into the 1950’s and became famous for its the and the after himself and appearance in the movie “BendHenderson of the River” starring James his wife. There was fierceT. J. Potter, competition among the numerous- Stewart. This film included an old-time steamboat racePortland down, passenger carriers on the run to Astoria, especially from the the Columbia River,Henderson with the going up against famous sidewheeler owned by the Oregon Rail the heavily disguised steel-hulled sternwheeler way and Navigation Company (ORNC). -
Section 10 Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data
General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 LOCOMOTIVE AND ROLLING STOCK DATA General Instruction Pages Locomotive and Rolling Stock Data SECTION 10 Contents 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Locomotives................................................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................................................................3 3801 Limited Eveleigh - Freight Rolling Stock ...................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Locomotives ................................................................................................3 Australian Traction Corporation - Freight Rolling Stock....................................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Locomotives................................................................3 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Rail Motors ..................................................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Passenger Rolling Stock...............................................4 Australian Railway Historical Society A.C.T. Division – Freight Rolling Stock....................................................4 Australian Rail Track Corporation Ltd - Special Purpose Rolling Stock..............................................................4 -
The Last Car Is Changing
"In the gaudy lexicon of railroad jargon, it has more names than any other property in the economy of the high iron, even more than there are for engines and engine drivers. It is a caboose, the last crummy, way car, van, cage, doghouse, drone house, bouncer, • bedhouse, buggy, chariot, shelter house, glory wagon, go-car, hack, hut, monkey wagon, pavilion, palace, parlor, brainbox, zoo, oar1s diner, kitchen, perambulator, cabin car and shanty. There are probably others in a variety only bounded by the limitations of human imagining and the vocabulary of profane and ohanging uninhibited men." -A Treasury of Railroad Folklore Early version of the caboose. 14 UNION PACIFIC INFO a natural part of every railroad. lookout nest on top lives on in the memories of old-timers who can THEN ... Still, there was a time when the still hear it hustling along far behind No one knows for sure when the conductor parked himself wherever the huffing and puffing steam loco "caboose" came into existence. he could ride in the early days. motives of yesteryear. The word dates to the time when it Maybe it was in a boxcar, or lying described either a ship's galley or prone on a flatcar or in the engine ... NOW... the galley's iron cookstoves. One or wherever he could hang on for Today the caboose is still a familiar dictionary says it was derived from awhile. sight on most railroads, although the Dutch work "kabuis" that de But the conductor, being are some no longer use it on every freight veloped from the Middle Low sourceful soul who played an essen train. -
Appendix I – Container/Equipment Description Codes
Customs Automated Manifest Interface Requirements – Ocean ACE M1 Appendix I Container/Equipment Description Codes This appendix provides a complete listing of valid container/equipment description codes. Code Description 00 Openings at one end or both ends. 01 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus "full" opening(s) on one or both sides. 02 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus "partial" opening(s) on one or both sides. 03 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus opening roof. 04 Opening(s) at one or both ends plus opening roof, plus opening(s) at one or both sides. 05 (Spare) 06 (Spare) 07 (Spare) 08 (Spare) 09 (Spare) 10 Passive vents at upper part of cargo space - Total vent cross-section area < 25 cm2/m of nominal container length. 11 Passive vents at upper part of cargo space - Total vent cross-section area > 25cm2/m of nominal container length. 12 (Spare) 13 Non-mechanical system, vents at lower and upper parts of cargo space. 14 (Spare) 15 Mechanical ventilation system, located internally. 16 (Spare) 17 Mechanical ventilation system, located externally. 18 (Spare) 19 (Spare) 21 Insulated - containers shall have insulation "K" values of Kmax < 0.7 W/(m2.oC). 22 Heated - containers shall have insulation "K" values of Kmax < 0.4 W/(m2.oC). Containers shall be required to maintain the internal temperatures given in ISO 1496/2. Series 1 freight containers – specification and testing - part 2: Thermal containers. 23 (Spare). 24 (Spare). 25 (Spare) Livestock carrier. CAMIR V1.4 November 2010 Appendix I I-1 Customs Automated Manifest Interface Requirements – Ocean ACE M1 Code Description 26 (Spare) Automobile carrier. -
Cruise Boat Industry Economic Impact Assessment
October 2020 Lewis Clark Valley Cruise Boat Industry Economic Impact Assessment PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY October 2020 Lewis Clark Valley Cruise Boat Industry Economic Impact Assessment PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction and Methodology ......................................................................................................... 3 Lewis Clark Valley Cruise Industry ..................................................................................................... 4 History of Riverboats in Lewis Clark Valley ........................................................................................................ 4 Cruise Ship and Passenger Volume ...................................................................................................................... 5 Vessel Travel Patterns ................................................................................................................................................ 6 Passenger Travel Patterns ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Passenger Tours ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Additional Spending Opportunities ....................................................................................................................