New Observational Insight on Shock Interactions Toward Supernovae and Supernova Remnants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

New Observational Insight on Shock Interactions Toward Supernovae and Supernova Remnants Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Kilpatrick, Charles Donald Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 23:53:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/621574 NEW OBSERVATIONAL INSIGHT ON SHOCK INTERACTIONS TOWARD SUPERNOVAE AND SUPERNOVA REMNANTS by Charles Donald Kilpatrick Copyright c Charles Donald Kilpatrick 2016 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2016 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Charles Donald Kilpatrick entitled New Observational Insight on Shock Inter- actions Toward Supernovae and Supernova Remnants and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: 14 June 2016 George Rieke Date: 14 June 2016 David Arnett Date: 14 June 2016 John Bieging Date: 14 June 2016 Peter Milne Date: 14 June 2016 Nathan Smith Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s sub- mission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recom- mend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. Date: 14 June 2016 Dissertation Director: George Rieke 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permission, provided that an accurate acknowledgment of the source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: Charles Donald Kilpatrick 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the many mentors and collaborators who have facilitated my devel- opment as a scientist. Foremost, my advisor George Rieke has constantly supported me in all my research interests. Every one of the opportunities I have had to explore infrared, optical, millimeter, and radio astronomy, to conduct research on supernova remnants, su- pernovae, and transients, and to start and complete all of the projects in this dissertation are owed to George. John Bieging taught me millimeter observing and had the patience to help me become a better writer. Nathan Smith guided me toward a much deeper under- standing of supernovae and gave me several opportunities to conduct my own research as an observer. Thanks to the staff scientists and colleagues who have shown a willingness and ex- citement to support my research. I would like to acknowledge the staff at the Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope, the Bok Telescope, and the Kuiper Telescope, especially Joe Hoscheidt whose hard work and dedication to maintaining Arizona telescopes extends to winding mountain drives in the dead of night. Don McCarthy and Craig Kulesa de- voted considerable time to setting up PISCES infrared camera on the Bok 90” Telescope, guiding my data reduction efforts, and reading my manuscripts for publication. Members of the Arizona Transient Exploration and Characterization collaboration, especially Pe- ter Milne, Wen-fai Fong, and Jen Andrews, have contributed countless hours to this work through informal chats, brainstorming new ideas, and help in data reduction. Dave Arnett has had an enormous influence on my research and I am grateful for his encouragement and willingness to challenge my ideas about Cassiopeia A. I would like to express my gratitude to the many scientists whose data I solicited in writing this dissertation, including Crystal Brogan for providing her 90 cm data of Galactic supernova remnants, David Moffett for providing 20 cm radio continuum data of 3C 391, Jeonghee Rho and Kristoffer Eriksen for providing Ks band imaging of Cassiopeia A, and Alex Filippenko and the Berkeley transient group for providing optical spectroscopy of PS15si. I would also like to thank Felix Aharonian and Joachim Hahn for their helpful comments on gamma-ray emission from supernova remnants. Some of the observations reported in this dissertation were obtained using the Bart J. Bok 90” Telescope operated by Steward Observatory, the MMT Observatory operated jointly by the University of Arizona and the Smithsonian Institution, and the W. M. Keck Observatory operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technol- ogy, the University of California, and NASA. The Heinrich Hertz Submillimeter Telescope is operated by the Arizona Radio Observatory with partial support from National Science Foundation grant AST 1140030. The research in this dissertation was supported by NASA through Contract Number 1255094 issued by JPL/Caltech. 5 DEDICATION To Dad and Zack: for providing the examples to which I aspire as a scientist. To Mom: for being the first person to take me to the library, the museum, and school. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES . .9 LIST OF TABLES . 11 ABSTRACT . 12 CHAPTER 1 Introduction . 14 1.1 The Physics of Supernova Shocks . 15 1.2 Dynamical Evolution of Supernova Shocks . 17 1.2.1 Free-Expansion Phase . 17 1.2.2 Snowplow Phase . 19 1.3 Electromagnetic Signatures of Shocks From Supernovae and Supernova Remnants . 21 1.3.1 Supernovae with Circumstellar Interactions . 21 1.3.2 Nonthermal Emission from Young Supernova Remnants . 22 1.3.3 Interactions Between Supernova Remnants and Molecular Clouds 24 1.4 This Volume . 26 CHAPTER 2 PS15si: A Type Ia/IIn Supernova with Late-time Rebrightening . 27 2.1 Introduction . 27 2.2 Observations . 30 2.3 Results . 34 2.3.1 Photometry . 34 2.3.2 Spectroscopy . 36 2.4 Discussion . 44 2.4.1 PS15si Explosion Date and Maximum R band Magnitude . 44 2.4.2 Luminosity of the CSM and Underlying SN . 47 2.4.3 Late-Time Rebrightening and Spectral Fitting of SNe Ia/IIn . 49 2.5 Conclusion . 50 CHAPTER 3 Variability in the Near-Infrared Synchrotron Emission From Cas- siopeia A . 52 3.1 Introduction . 52 3.2 Observations . 54 3.3 Results and Analysis . 55 3.3.1 Fast-Moving Features . 55 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Continued 3.3.2 Are the Ks Band Knots Dominated by Synchrotron Emission? . 57 3.3.3 IRAC Measurements . 59 3.3.4 Physical Parameters of Synchrotron-Emitting Knots . 62 3.4 Discussion . 64 3.5 Conclusions . 65 CHAPTER 4 Interaction Between Cassiopeia A and Nearby Molecular Clouds . 66 4.1 Introduction . 66 4.2 Observations . 68 4.3 CO Line Emission Around Cas A . 71 4.3.1 Kinematics of CO Line Emission as Observed in J = 2 − 1 Spectra 71 4.3.2 Possible Cloud/SNR Interactions . 74 4.3.3 CO Line Broadening . 74 4.4 Analysis of Cas A Infrared Spectroscopy . 79 4.4.1 Spectral Features . 79 4.4.2 [O IV] 25.94 µm line . 82 4.4.3 Analysis of Low-Resolution [O IV] Emission . 87 4.5 Discussion . 91 4.5.1 Possible Mechanisms for CO Line Broadening in Regions Beyond the Cas A Shock Front . 92 4.5.2 Broadening by Stellar Winds . 92 4.5.3 Broadening by Interaction with Outflows of Fast-Moving Knots . 93 4.5.4 Turbulence in Mid-Infrared Line Emission . 94 4.5.5 Comparison to Other Studies of SNR/MC Interactions . 97 4.6 Conclusion . 99 CHAPTER 5 A Systematic Survey for Broadened CO Lines Toward Galactic Super- nova Remnants . 101 5.1 Introduction . 101 5.2 Source Selection and Distances . 103 5.2.1 Distances . 106 5.3 Observations . 107 5.4 Algorithm for Selecting BML Regions from Observations . 109 5.4.1 Data . 109 5.4.2 Summary of BML Region Algorithm . 109 5.4.3 Criteria for Possible Interactions . 111 5.4.4 BML Region Identification . 113 5.4.5 BML Region Examples: 3C 391 and Cas A . 115 5.4.6 Comparison to Other BML Region Indicators . 118 5.5 Results . 120 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS – Continued 5.5.1 SNRs with Previous Detections Supporting SNR-MC Interactions 121 5.5.2 Non-Detection Toward G54.1+0.3 . 126 5.5.3 Newly Identified SNR-MC Systems . 127 5.6 Discussion . 141 5.6.1 The SNR-MC Interaction Rate . 141 5.6.2 To What Extent Are SNR-MC Interactions Detectable in 12CO J = 2 − 1?............................. 142 5.6.3 Suppressing the SNR-MC Interaction Rate . 145 5.6.4 Astrophysical Implications of a Low SNR-MC Interaction Rate . 146 5.6.5 Gamma-Ray Emission from SNR-MC Interactions . 147 5.7 Conclusion . 151 CHAPTER 6 Conclusion . 154 6.1 Results . 154 6.2 Future Direction . 156 6.2.1 Late-time Radio Emission from Supernovae . 156 6.2.2 Measuring the Physical Properties of Molecular Clouds Shocked by Supernova Remnants . 159 APPENDIX A Mid-Infrared Fine Structure Lines . 162 A.1 [S III] 18.71 µm line . 162 A.2 [S IV] 10.51 µm line . 162 A.3 [Ne II] 12.81 µm line .
Recommended publications
  • Pos(BASH 2013)009 † ∗ Dmilisav@Cfa.Harvard.Edu Speaker

    Pos(BASH 2013)009 † ∗ [email protected] Speaker

    The Progenitor Systems and Explosion Mechanisms of Supernovae PoS(BASH 2013)009 Dan Milisavljevic∗ † Harvard University E-mail: [email protected] Supernovae are among the most powerful explosions in the universe. They affect the energy balance, global structure, and chemical make-up of galaxies, they produce neutron stars, black holes, and some gamma-ray bursts, and they have been used as cosmological yardsticks to detect the accelerating expansion of the universe. Fundamental properties of these cosmic engines, however, remain uncertain. In this review we discuss the progress made over the last two decades in understanding supernova progenitor systems and explosion mechanisms. We also comment on anticipated future directions of research and highlight alternative methods of investigation using young supernova remnants. Frank N. Bash Symposium 2013: New Horizons in Astronomy October 6-8, 2013 Austin, Texas ∗Speaker. †Many thanks to R. Fesen, A. Soderberg, R. Margutti, J. Parrent, and L. Mason for helpful discussions and support during the preparation of this manuscript. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Supernova Progenitor Systems and Explosion Mechanisms Dan Milisavljevic PoS(BASH 2013)009 Figure 1: Left: Hubble Space Telescope image of the Crab Nebula as observed in the optical. This is the remnant of the original explosion of SN 1054. Credit: NASA/ESA/J.Hester/A.Loll. Right: Multi- wavelength composite image of Tycho’s supernova remnant. This is associated with the explosion of SN 1572. Credit NASA/CXC/SAO (X-ray); NASA/JPL-Caltech (Infrared); MPIA/Calar Alto/Krause et al.
  • Curriculum Vitae Avishay Gal-Yam

    Curriculum Vitae Avishay Gal-Yam

    January 27, 2017 Curriculum Vitae Avishay Gal-Yam Personal Name: Avishay Gal-Yam Current address: Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100 Rehovot, Israel. Telephones: home: 972-8-9464749, work: 972-8-9342063, Fax: 972-8-9344477 e-mail: [email protected] Born: March 15, 1970, Israel Family status: Married + 3 Citizenship: Israeli Education 1997-2003: Ph.D., School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. Advisor: Prof. Dan Maoz 1994-1996: B.Sc., Magna Cum Laude, in Physics and Mathematics, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. (1989-1993: Military service.) Positions 2013- : Head, Physics Core Facilities Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. 2012- : Associate Professor, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. 2008- : Head, Kraar Observatory Program, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. 2007- : Visiting Associate, California Institute of Technology. 2007-2012: Senior Scientist, Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel. 2006-2007: Postdoctoral Scholar, California Institute of Technology. 2003-2006: Hubble Postdoctoral Fellow, California Institute of Technology. 1996-2003: Physics and Mathematics Research and Teaching Assistant, Tel Aviv University. Honors and Awards 2012: Kimmel Award for Innovative Investigation. 2010: Krill Prize for Excellence in Scientific Research. 2010: Isreali Physical Society (IPS) Prize for a Young Physicist (shared with E. Nakar). 2010: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) ARCHES Prize. 2010: Levinson Physics Prize. 2008: The Peter and Patricia Gruber Award. 2007: European Union IRG Fellow. 2006: “Citt`adi Cefal`u"Prize. 2003: Hubble Fellow. 2002: Tel Aviv U. School of Physics and Astronomy award for outstanding achievements. 2000: Colton Fellow. 2000: Tel Aviv U. School of Physics and Astronomy research and teaching excellence award.
  • Arxiv:1402.6337V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 25 Feb 2014 Novae (SN Ia) Prevent Studies from Conclusively Singling Et Al

    Arxiv:1402.6337V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 25 Feb 2014 Novae (SN Ia) Prevent Studies from Conclusively Singling Et Al

    A review of type Ia supernova spectra J. Parrent1,2, B. Friesen3, and M. Parthasarathy4 Abstract SN 2011fe was the nearest and best-observed fairly certain that the progenitor system of SN Ia com- type Ia supernova in a generation, and brought previ- prises at least one compact C+O white dwarf (Chan- ous incomplete datasets into sharp contrast with the drasekhar 1957; Nugent et al. 2011; Bloom et al. 2012). detailed new data. In retrospect, documenting spectro- However, how the state of this primary star reaches scopic behaviors of type Ia supernovae has been more a critical point of disruption continues to elude as- often limited by sparse and incomplete temporal sam- tronomers. This is particularly so given that less than pling than by consequences of signal-to-noise ratios, ∼ 15% of locally observed white dwarfs have a mass a telluric features, or small sample sizes. As a result, few 0.1M greater than a solar mass; very few systems 5 type Ia supernovae have been primarily studied insofar near the formal Chandrasekhar-mass limit ,MCh ≈ as parameters discretized by relative epochs and incom- 1.38 M (Vennes 1999; Liebert et al. 2005; Napiwotzki plete temporal snapshots near maximum light. Here we et al. 2005; Parthasarathy et al. 2007; Napiwotzki et al. discuss a necessary next step toward consistently mod- 2007). eling and directly measuring spectroscopic observables Thus far observational constraints of SN Ia have of type Ia supernova spectra. In addition, we analyze been inconclusive in distinguishing between the follow- current spectroscopic data in the parameter space de- ing three separate theoretical considerations about pos- fined by empirical metrics, which will be relevant even sible progenitor scenarios.
  • Formation of Dust and Molecules in Supernovae

    Formation of Dust and Molecules in Supernovae

    2019/02/06 Formation of dust and molecules in supernovae Takaya Nozawa (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) SN 1987A Cassiopeia A SNR 0509-67.5 1-1. Introduction Question : Can supernovae (SNe) produce molecules and dust grains? Nozawa 2014, Astronomical Herald 2-1. Thermal emission from dust in SN 1987A light curve 60day 200day (optical luminosity) 415day 615day Whitelock+89 - dust starts to form in the 755day ejecta at ~400 days - dust mass ay 775 day: > ~10-4 Msun (optically thin assumed) Wooden+93 2-2. CO and SiO detection in SN 1987A CO first overtone: 2.29-2.5 μm 97 day CO fundamental: 4.65-6.0 μm SiO fundamental: 7.6-9.5 μm 200day SN Ic 2000ew, Gerardy+2002 415day 615day 58 day 755day SN II-pec 1987A, Wooden+1993 SN II-P 2016adj, Banerjee+2018 2-3. CO and SiO masses in SN 1987A CO Gerardy+2002, see also Banerjee+2018 Liu+95 ‐CO emission is seen in various SiO types of CCSNe from ~50 day ‐CO/SiO masses in SN 1987A Mco > ~4x10-3 Msun MSiO > ~7x10-4 Msun Liu & Dalgarno 1996 2-4. Dust mass in Cassiopeia A (Cas A) SNR ○ Estimated mass of dust in Cas A ・ warm/hot dust (80-300K) (3-7)x10-3 Msun (IRAS, Dwek et al. 1987) ~7.7x10-5 Msun (ISO, Arendt et al. 1999) 0.02-0.054 Msun (Spitzer, Rho+2008) ➜ Mdust = 10-4-10-2 Msun consistent with >10-4 Msun in SN 1987A Dwek+1987, IRAS Rho+2008 Spitzer Arendt+1999, ISO 3-1.
  • Deaths of Stars

    Deaths of Stars

    Deaths of stars • Evolution of high mass stars • Where were the elements in your body made? • Stellar remnants • Degenerate gases • White dwarfs • Neutron stars In high mass stars, nuclear burning continues past Helium 1. Hydrogen burning: 10 Myr 2. Helium burning: 1 Myr 3. Carbon burning: 1000 years 4. Neon burning: ~10 years 5. Oxygen burning: ~1 year 6. Silicon burning: ~1 day Finally builds up an inert Iron core Structure of an Old High-Mass Star Why does nuclear fusion stop at Iron? Fusion versus Fission Fusion in massive stars makes elements like Ne, Si, S, Ca, Fe Core collapse • Iron core is degenerate • Core grows until it is too heavy to support itself • Core collapses, density increases, normal iron nuclei are converted into neutrons with the emission of neutrinos • Core collapse stops, neutron star is formed • Rest of the star collapses in on the core, but bounces off the new neutron star If I drop a ball, will it bounce higher than it began? Supernova explosion Core-Collapse Supernova SN 2011fe in M101 (Pinwheel) In 1987 a nearby supernova gave us a close-up look at the death of a massive star An Unusual Supernova • SN 1987A appears to have a set of three glowing rings • Relics of a hydrogen-rich outer atmosphere, ejected by gentle stellar winds from the star when it was a red supergiant. • The gas expanded in a hourglass shape because it was blocked from expanding around the star’s equator either by a preexisting ring of gas or by the orbit of an as-yet- unseen companion star.
  • Elliptical Galaxies Where Star Formation Is Thought to Have Ceased Long Ago → the Star That Explodes Is Old, Billions of Years

    Elliptical Galaxies Where Star Formation Is Thought to Have Ceased Long Ago → the Star That Explodes Is Old, Billions of Years

    Monday, February 3, 2014 First Exam, Skywatch, Friday February 7. Review sheet posted today. Review session Thursday, 5 – 6 PM, RLM 7.104 Reading: Section 5.1 (white dwarfs), 1.2.4 (quantum theory), Section 2.3 (quantum deregulation), Section 6.1 (supernovae; not Type Ib, Type Ic, next exam). Astronomy in the news? Update on new “nearby” supernova SN 2014J in M82 Our second attempt to measure the shape of the explosion with a telescope at Calar Alto, Spain, was messed up by weather. We are attempting to schedule time on MONET, a newly-robotocized telescope at McDonald Observatory, operated by collaborators in Germany. First spectrum Sulfur from Hubble Space Telescope Intensity Silicon Calcium Magnesium Wavelength Goal: To understand the observed nature of supernovae and determine whether they came from white dwarfs or massive stars that undergo core collapse. Categories of Supernovae 1st category discovered Type Ia – near peak light, no detectable Hydrogen or Helium in the spectrum, rather “intermediate mass elements” such as oxygen, magnesium, silicon, sulfur, calcium. Iron appears later as the light fades. Type Ia occur in all galaxy types: In spiral galaxies they tend to avoid the spiral arms, they have had time to drift away from the birth site → the star that explodes is old In elliptical galaxies where star formation is thought to have ceased long ago → the star that explodes is old, billions of years" the progenitor that explodes must be long-lived, not very massive, suggesting a white dwarf. Sun is long-lived, but won’t explode weeks Type Ia - no hydrogen or helium, Luminosity intermediate mass elements early, iron later SN 2014J about here Light Curve - brightness vs.
  • Science from the Mev Gamma Ray Sky

    Science from the Mev Gamma Ray Sky

    Science from the MeV Gamma Ray Sky Reshmi Mukherjee Barnard College, Columbia University, NY Reshmi Mukherjee The need …. - A sensitive survey of the γ-ray sky between 100 keV and 100 MeV 10-9 10-10 10-12 10-14 10-16 10-18 10-20 m 100 keV 0.5 MeV 100 TeV Reshmi Mukherjee Energy range & challenges . Energy range 300 keV to ~100 MeV . “Compton regime” -- notoriously difficult & challenging . Requires an efficient instrument with an excellent background subtraction . Last instrument to operate in this range: COMPTEL . Neither Fermi-LAT nor AGILE are optimized for observations below ~200 MeV or for polarization sensitivity. Freytag, Handbook of Accel. Phys. & Eng. (1971) Reshmi Mukherjee Compton Imaging McConnell, AAS 225th Reshmi Mukherjee Sensitivities - The MeV “Gap” / VERITAS From Takahashi 2012 Reshmi Mukherjee Talk Outline . Science motivation . Review highlights from “MeV” missions . Synergy with VHE and keV regime . Wish list for a future medium-energy instrument Reshmi Mukherjee Science goals for the “medium energy” . Explosive nucleosynthesis : a close look at core-collapse and thermonuclear supernovae . γ-ray lines (e.g. 511 keV, 70 MeV, + + + ) . Large number of soft γ-ray sources in the Galactic plane, yet to be discovered . Contribution of soft γ-ray sources to the medium-energy Galactic diffuse emission . The laws of physics around neutron stars and black holes . Measurements of transient phenomena . Spatially resolve variation between electron dominated and hadron dominated processes in the 70-200 MeV range.. Origin of cosmic rays? Reshmi Mukherjee from AstroMeV Origin of the highest energy cosmic rays? . >100 year old mystery ! . Enormous E range .
  • Luminous Blue Variables: an Imaging Perspective on Their Binarity and Near Environment?,??

    Luminous Blue Variables: an Imaging Perspective on Their Binarity and Near Environment?,??

    A&A 587, A115 (2016) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526578 & c ESO 2016 Astrophysics Luminous blue variables: An imaging perspective on their binarity and near environment?;?? Christophe Martayan1, Alex Lobel2, Dietrich Baade3, Andrea Mehner1, Thomas Rivinius1, Henri M. J. Boffin1, Julien Girard1, Dimitri Mawet4, Guillaume Montagnier5, Ronny Blomme2, Pierre Kervella7;6, Hugues Sana8, Stanislav Štefl???;9, Juan Zorec10, Sylvestre Lacour6, Jean-Baptiste Le Bouquin11, Fabrice Martins12, Antoine Mérand1, Fabien Patru11, Fernando Selman1, and Yves Frémat2 1 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, 19001 Casilla, Santiago de Chile, Chile e-mail: [email protected] 2 Royal Observatory of Belgium, 3 avenue Circulaire, 1180 Brussels, Belgium 3 European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching b. München, Germany 4 Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd, MC 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 Observatoire de Haute-Provence, CNRS/OAMP, 04870 Saint-Michel-l’Observatoire, France 6 LESIA (UMR 8109), Observatoire de Paris, PSL, CNRS, UPMC, Univ. Paris-Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France 7 Unidad Mixta Internacional Franco-Chilena de Astronomía (CNRS UMI 3386), Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Camino El Observatorio 1515, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile 8 ESA/Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218,
  • Tev Emission from NGC1275 Viewed by SHALON 15 Year Observations V.G

    Tev Emission from NGC1275 Viewed by SHALON 15 Year Observations V.G

    XVI International Symposium on Very High Energy Cosmic Ray Interactions ISVHECRI 2010, Batavia, IL, USA (28 June 2 July 2010) 1 TeV emission from NGC1275 viewed by SHALON 15 year observations V.G. Sinitsyna, S.I. Nikolsky, V.Y. Sinitsyna P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute, Leninsky pr. 53, Moscow, Russia The Perseus cluster of galaxies is one of the best studied clusters due to its proximity and its brightness. It have also been considered as sources of TeV gamma-rays. The new extragalactic source was detected at TeV energies in 1996 using the SHALON telescopic system. This object was identified with NGC 1275, a giant elliptical galaxy lying at the center of the Perseus cluster of galaxies; its image is presented. The maxima of the TeV gamma-ray, X-ray and radio emission coincide with the active nucleus of NGC 1275. But, the X-ray and TeV emission disappears almost completely in the vicinity of the radio lobes. The correlation TeV with X-ray emitting regions was found. The integral gamma-ray flux of NGC1275 is found to be (0.78 ± 0.13) × 10−12cm−2s−1 at energies > 0.8 TeV. Its energy spectrum from 0.8 to 40 TeV can be approximated by the power law with index k = −2.25 ± 0.10. NGC1275 has been also observed by other experiments: Tibet Array (5TeV) and then with Veritas telescope at energies about 300 GeV in 2009. The recent detection by the Fermi LAT of gamma- rays from the NGC1275 makes the observation of the energy E > 100 GeV part of its broadband spectrum particularly interesting.
  • Evidence of Environmental Dependencies of Type Ia Supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory Indicated by Local Hα?

    Evidence of Environmental Dependencies of Type Ia Supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory Indicated by Local Hα?

    A&A 560, A66 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322104 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Evidence of environmental dependencies of Type Ia supernovae from the Nearby Supernova Factory indicated by local Hα? M. Rigault1, Y. Copin1, G. Aldering2, P. Antilogus3, C. Aragon2, S. Bailey2, C. Baltay4, S. Bongard3, C. Buton5, A. Canto3, F. Cellier-Holzem3, M. Childress6, N. Chotard1, H. K. Fakhouri2;7, U. Feindt,5, M. Fleury3, E. Gangler1, P. Greskovic5, J. Guy3, A. G. Kim2, M. Kowalski5, S. Lombardo5, J. Nordin2;8, P. Nugent9;10, R. Pain3, E. Pécontal11, R. Pereira1, S. Perlmutter2;7, D. Rabinowitz4, K. Runge2, C. Saunders2, R. Scalzo6, G. Smadja1, C. Tao12;13, R. C. Thomas9, and B. A. Weaver14 (The Nearby Supernova Factory) 1 Université de Lyon, Université de Lyon 1; CNRS/IN2P3, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 3 Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et des Hautes Énergies, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Université Paris Diderot Paris 7, CNRS-IN2P3, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France 4 Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8121, USA 5 Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Nußallee 12, 53115 Bonn, Germany 6 Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory, Cotter Road, Weston Creek ACT 2611, Australia 7 Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, 366 LeConte
  • Publications for Richard Scalzo 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

    Publications for Richard Scalzo 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016

    Publications for Richard Scalzo 2021 2019 Olierook, H., Scalzo, R., Kohn, D., Chandra, R., Farahbakhsh, Scalzo, R., Kohn, D., Olierook, H., Houseman, G., Chandra, R., E., Clark, C., Reddy, S., Muller, R. (2021). Bayesian geological Girolami, M., Cripps, S. (2019). Efficiency and robustness in and geophysical data fusion for the construction and uncertainty Monte Carlo sampling for 3-Dgeophysical inversions with quantification of 3D geological models. Geoscience Frontiers, Obsidian v0.1.2: setting up for success. Geoscientific Model 12(1), 479-493. <a Development, 12, 2941-2960. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.04.015">[More href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2941-2019">[More Information]</a> Information]</a> Sweeney, D., Norris, B., Tuthill, P., Scalzo, R., Wei, J., Betters, Scalzo, R., Parent, E., Burns, C., Childress, M., Tucker, B., C., Leon-Saval, S. (2021). Learning the lantern: neural network Brown, P., Contreras, C., Hsiao, E., Krisciunas, K., Morrell, N., applications to broadband photonic lantern modeling. Journal et al (2019). Probing type Ia supernova properties using of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 7(2), bolometric light curves from the Carnegie Supernova Project 028007-1-028007-20. <a and the CfA Supernova Group. Monthly Notices of the Royal href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JATIS.7.2.028007">[More Astronomical Society, 483(1), 628-647. <a Information]</a> href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3178">[More Wong, A., Norris, B., Tuthill, P., Scalzo, R., Lozi, J., Vievard, Information]</a> S., Guyon, O. (2021). Predictive control for adaptive optics Varidel, M., Croom, S., Lewis, G., Brewer, B., Di Teodoro, E., using neural networks.
  • Type Ia Supernova Rate at a Redshift of ∼0.1

    Type Ia Supernova Rate at a Redshift of ∼0.1

    A&A 423, 881–894 (2004) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035948 & c ESO 2004 Astrophysics Type Ia supernova rate at a redshift of ∼0.1 G. Blanc1,12,22,C.Afonso1,4,8,23,C.Alard24,J.N.Albert2, G. Aldering15,,A.Amadon1, J. Andersen6,R.Ansari2, É. Aubourg1,C.Balland13,21,P.Bareyre1,4,J.P.Beaulieu5, X. Charlot1, A. Conley15,, C. Coutures1,T.Dahlén19, F. Derue13,X.Fan16, R. Ferlet5, G. Folatelli11, P. Fouqué9,10,G.Garavini11, J. F. Glicenstein1, B. Goldman1,4,8,23, A. Goobar11, A. Gould1,7,D.Graff7,M.Gros1, J. Haissinski2, C. Hamadache1,D.Hardin13,I.M.Hook25, J. de Kat1,S.Kent18,A.Kim15, T. Lasserre1, L. Le Guillou1,É.Lesquoy1,5, C. Loup5, C. Magneville1, J. B. Marquette5,É.Maurice3,A.Maury9, A. Milsztajn1, M. Moniez2, M. Mouchet20,22,H.Newberg17,S.Nobili11, N. Palanque-Delabrouille1 , O. Perdereau2,L.Prévot3,Y.R.Rahal2, N. Regnault2,14,15,J.Rich1, P. Ruiz-Lapuente27, M. Spiro1, P. Tisserand1, A. Vidal-Madjar5, L. Vigroux1,N.A.Walton26, and S. Zylberajch1 1 DSM/DAPNIA, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France 2 Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire, IN2P3 CNRS, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 3 Observatoire de Marseille, 2 pl. Le Verrier, 13248 Marseille Cedex 04, France 4 Collège de France, Physique Corpusculaire et Cosmologie, IN2P3 CNRS, 11 pl. M. Berthelot, 75231 Paris Cedex, France 5 Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, INSU CNRS, 98 bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France 6 Astronomical Observatory, Copenhagen University, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 7 Departments of Astronomy and Physics, Ohio