Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan 2020-2029

Chapter 9

Document Control Synergy Record Number R2021/2

Rev No Date Revision Details Author Reviewer(s) Approver 1 25 Sep 2020 Draft CAS Elected Members Elected Members 2 20 October Revision incorporating CAS Elected Members Audit and Risk 2020 comments from Elected Committee Members 3 29 October Revision incorporating CAS Elected Members Council 2020 comments from Audit Committee 4 10 November Consultation Version CAS Elected Members Council 2020 5 7 January Version for adoption CAS Elected Members Council 2021 6 19 January Adopted version CAS Elected Members Council 2021

Contents

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 1.1 The Purpose of the Plan ...... 1 1.2 Asset Description ...... 1 1.3 What Does it Cost?...... 1 1.4 Plans for the Future ...... 2 1.5 Measuring our Performance ...... 2 1.5 The Next Steps ...... 3 2. INTRODUCTION ...... 4 2.1 Background ...... 4 2.1.1 Strategic Linkages ...... 4 2.1.2 Infrastructure and Assets included in the plan ...... 4 2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Management ...... 4 2.3 Plan Framework ...... 4 3. LEVELS OF SERVICE ...... 6 3.1 Customer Research and Expectations ...... 6 3.2 Strategic and Corporate Goals ...... 7 3.3 Legislative Requirements ...... 7 3.4 Levels of Service ...... 7 3.3.1 Customer Values ...... 8 3.3.1 Community Levels of Service ...... 9 3.3.3 Technical Levels of Service ...... 11 4. FUTURE DEMAND ...... 14 4.1 Demand Drivers and Forecast ...... 14 4.2 Climate Change ...... 14 4.3 Legislation change...... 15 4.4 Changes in Technology ...... 15 4.5 Demand Management Plan ...... 15 4.6 New Assets from Growth ...... 16 5. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN ...... 17 5.1 Background Data ...... 17 5.1.1 Physical Parameters ...... 17 5.1.2 Asset Capacity and Performance ...... 20 5.1.3 Asset Condition ...... 21 5.1.4 Asset Valuation ...... 22

5.2 Risk Management Plan ...... 24 5.3 Maintenance Plan ...... 27 5.3.1 Maintenance Types ...... 27 5.3.2 Maintenance Arrangements ...... 28 5.3.3 Standards and Specifications ...... 28 5.3.4 Maintenance Expenditure Patterns ...... 28 5.4 Renewal Plan ...... 29 5.4.1 Renewal Priority ...... 29 5.4.2 Renewal Standards ...... 30 5.4.3 Summary of future renewal expenditure ...... 31 5.4.4 Renewal Back log ...... 31 5.4.5 Renewal Projection ...... 31 5.5 New and Upgrade Plan ...... 32 5.5.1 Selection Criteria ...... 32 5.5.2 Standards and Specifications ...... 32 5.5.3 Future upgrades/new assets expenditure ...... 32 5.6 Disposal Plan ...... 33 6 FINANCIAL SUMMARY ...... 34 6.1 Financial Statements and Projections ...... 34 6.1.1 Sustainability of Service Delivery ...... 34 6.2 Funding Strategy ...... 36 6.3 Valuation Forecasts ...... 36 6.4 Key Assumptions made in Financial Forecasts ...... 37 7 ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ...... 39 7.1 Accounting/Financial Systems ...... 39 7.2 Asset Information System ...... 39 7.3 Information Flow Requirements and Processes ...... 39 7.4 Standards and Guidelines ...... 39 8 PLAN IMPROVEMENT AND MONITORING ...... 40 8.1 Performance Measures ...... 40 8.2 Improvement Plan ...... 40 8.3 Monitoring and Review Procedures ...... 41 9 REFERENCES ...... 42 APPENDIX A – Transport Planned operating, capital renewal and capital upgrade expenditure ...... 43 APPENDIX B – Transport Rules for Finance and Asset Finda ...... 44 APPENDIX C – Strategic Document Recommendations ...... 46 APPENDIX D – Classification Maps ...... 50

APPENDIX E – Road Cross Section Standard Drawings ...... 51 APPENDIX F – Renewal Priorities – ...... 54 APPENDIX G – Renewal Priorities – Other Transport Assets ...... 57 APPENDIX H – Upgrade Priorities ...... 58 APPENDIX I – Road Action Plan ...... 60

Tables Table 1: Lifecycle Costs ...... 2 Table 2: Planned Maintenance and Renewal Expenditure ...... 2 Table 3: Assets Covered by the IAMP - Transport ...... 4 Table 4: Strategic Goals and how they are addressed in this IAMP ...... 7 Table 5: Customer Values ...... 8 Table 6: Community Levels of Service ...... 9 Table 7: Technical Levels of Service – Sealed Roads ...... 11 Table 8: Climate Change Adaptation Plan Actions ...... 14 Table 9: Demand Management Plan ...... 15 Table 10: Physical Parameters, including age profile ...... 17 Table 11: Transport Asset Service Hierarchy ...... 19 Table 12: Service Deficiencies ...... 20 Table 13: Valuation Summary as at 30 June 2020 ...... 23 Table 14: Risk Assessment Summary ...... 25 Table 15: Historic Maintenance Expenditure ...... 28 Table 16: Renewal Priority Ranking Criteria ...... 30 Table 17: Summary of life cycle costs ...... 34 Table 18: Accumulative Renewal Funding Gap ...... 35 Table 19: Improvement Plan ...... 40

Figures Figure 1: Visitor satisfaction with quality of road signage ...... 6 Figure 2: Visitor satisfaction with quality of roads ...... 6 Figure 3: Asset Condition - Sealed Roads ...... 21 Figure 4: Asset Condition - Sheeted Roads ...... 21 Figure 5: Asset Condition - Carparks ...... 22 Figure 6: Asset Condition - ...... 22 Figure 7: Maintenance Expenditure Projections ...... 29 Figure 8: Projected Renewal Expenditure ...... 31 Figure 9: New and Upgrade Forecast ...... 32 Figure 10: Financial Projections - Operating, Capital Upgrade and Capital Renewal ...... 34 Figure 11: Projected Asset Renewals – Including $2m DPTI funding ...... 35 Figure 12: Current Replacement Cost Forecast ...... 36 Figure 13: Depreciation Forecast ...... 37 Figure 14: Depreciated Replacement Cost Forecast ...... 37

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This IAMP, Chapter 9, is to be read with IAMP Chapter 1 – General Statements.

1.1 The Purpose of the Plan Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. This chapter covers the infrastructure assets that comprise a Transport network to enable safe and efficient travel on Kangaroo Island.

1.2 Asset Description Assets included in this IAMP - Chapter 9, Transport are:1  Roads (Township, Rural and Access Roads2) . Road Surfaces:  Sealed, Pavement, Sub-Pavement, Formation  Sheeted, Sub-Sheeted, Formation  Carparks2  Footpaths  fencing  Pram ramps  Signs  Walking Trails/Shared Use Paths The Transport network has a total replacement value of $384,509,137.

1.3 What Does it Cost? The key indicators of cost in providing levels of service used in this IAMP are lifecycle costs and maintenance and renewal expenditure.

Lifecycle Costs (Long Terms costs) Lifecycle costs are the average costs that are required to sustain the service levels for the longest asset life. Lifecycle costs include maintenance and asset consumption (depreciation expense). Lifecycle expenditure is maintenance plus capital renewal expenditure.

1 In the previous iteration, cross drains, floodways, and embankments were included under the Transport IAMP, they are now included within Chapter 8 – Stormwater. 2 In the previous iteration, carparks and access roads were included under the Reserve Furniture IAMP, they are now included within Chapter 9 - Transport

Table 1: Lifecycle Costs

Average Average Life Cycle Sustainability Asset Category Annual Lifecycle Gap Index Lifecycle Cost Expenditure Transport $4,656,254 $3,603,153 $1,053,101 77%

Planned Maintenance and Renewal Expenditure (Medium term costs) The projected maintenance and capital renewal expenditure to deliver existing service levels for the period 2020 to 2029 versus Council’s planned maintenance and capital renewal expenditure is shown in the table below. Council currently receives $2,000,000 annually from DPTI for the renewal of high volume unsealed roads. It is anticipated that this will continue until it is no longer required and as such this plan has been written assuming the funding will continue for the length of the plan. If this does not continue, the condition of the roads will deteriorate as funding from Council rates is not sufficient to maintain the entire network. Table 2: Planned Maintenance and Renewal Expenditure

Planned Average 10 Total 10 Year Average 10 Maintenance Year Planned Maintenance Year & Capital Maintenance Sustainability Asset Category & Capital Maintenance Renewal & Capital Index Renewal & Capital Expenditure Renewal Expenditure Renewal (2018-19) Expenditure Transport $36,031,526 $3,603,153 $3,512,362 $3,181,685 97%

For further information on financial indicators, refer to Section 6 of this Chapter of the Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan.

1.4 Plans for the Future Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. In addition, Council plans to operate and maintain the Transport network to achieve the following strategic outcome and objective from the Kangaroo Island Council Strategic Plan 2020-2024 (Kangaroo Island Council, 2020):  Infrastructure: A built environment focused on essential and community service o 1.1 Road and Assets: Develop and maintain our roads and physical assets to acceptable standards For further information on strategic actions, refer to section 3.2 of this Chapter of the Infrastructure Asset Management Plan.

1.5 Measuring our Performance Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

1.5 The Next Steps Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Background This IAMP, Chapter 9, is to be read with IAMP Chapter 1 – General Statements. This Chapter covers the assets involved with the Transport on Kangaroo Island and represents the asset base as at 30 June 2020. 2.1.1 Strategic Linkages In addition to the documents listed in Chapter 1 – General Statements, this infrastructure and asset management plan has considered and is aligned with the following strategic and planning documents:-  2020 Transport Plan (Southern & Hills Local Government Association, 2015)  Inquiry Into the National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020 (NRSS Inquiry Panel, 2018)  Kangaroo Island Council Roadside Vegetation Management Plan 2007 (Kangaroo Island Council, 2007)  Kangaroo Island Regional Transport Strategy (KI Regional Transport Strategy Steering Group, 2007)  Road Classification Guidelines In South Australia (Local Roads Advisory Committee for the Determination of Road Classification in South Australia, 2018)  Road Network Extension Policy (Kangaroo Island Council, 2014) 2.1.2 Infrastructure and Assets included in the plan This infrastructure and asset management plan covers the following infrastructure assets: Table 3: Assets Covered by the IAMP - Transport

Unit Replacement Asset Category Dimension Value ($) Roads 1341 km $375,536,326 Carparks 47 number $2,582,550 Footpaths 10439 metres $1,820,717 Guardrails 6445 metres $1,912,450 Walking Trails 18038 m2 $1,144,584 Pram Ramps 146 number $145,600 Signs 4538 number $1,366,910 TOTAL $384,509,137

2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Management Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

2.3 Plan Framework The key elements of this IAMP are:-

 Levels of service specifies the services and levels of service to be provided by Council.  Future demand how this will impact on future service delivery and how this is to be met.  Life cycle management how Council will manage its existing and future assets to provide the required services.  Financial Summary what funds are required to provide the services.  Asset Management Practices what systems, standards and guidelines are utilised to maintain and further develop asset management practices.  Plan Improvement and Monitoring how the plan will be assessed to ensure it is meeting Council’s objectives.

3. LEVELS OF SERVICE

3.1 Customer Research and Expectations Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. Of all Council’s assets, roads are considered the resident’s highest priority. This is reflected by the Residents Infrastructure priorities indicated through the resident surveys run by TOMM Kangaroo Island Committee and shown in Chapter 1 – General Statements. The following figures show responses to the surveys run by TOMM Kangaroo Island Committee (TOMM Kangaroo Island Committee, 2019) that are specifically relevant to Transport.

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 % very satisfied %very satisfied/satisfied % very dissatisfied/dissatisfied

Figure 1: Visitor satisfaction with quality of road signage

Figure 1 indicates a gradual improvement in visitor satisfaction with road signage, indicating that Council is doing well with road signage.

80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 % very satisfied %very satisfied/satisfied % very dissatisfied/dissatisfied

Figure 2: Visitor satisfaction with quality of roads

Figure 2 shows that overall there has been an improvement with visitor satisfaction with the quality of roads, although there was a slight decrease in satisfaction in the latest survey. It demonstrates that Council is heading in the right direction with the work done over the past 10 years however this work needs to continue to ensure the ongoing improvement of our roads.

3.2 Strategic and Corporate Goals Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. Council’s Strategic objectives and how these are addressed in this IAMP are summarised in Table 4. Table 4: Strategic Goals and how they are addressed in this IAMP

Goal Objective How Goal and Objectives are addressed in this IAMP 1.1.2 Secure at least $2M per annum Local Road Sustainability funding– included in the Improvement Plan.

A built environment 1.1.3 Develop joint asset management plans with focussed on essential Develop and maintain our roads and government agencies for roads and marine and Community physical assets to acceptable standards infrastructure.– included in the Improvement Plan. services 1.1.4 Obtain funding to undertake a road safety audit and plan – to achieve national safety standards (including signage for all island roads).– included in the Improvement Plan.

Our environment is Statutory requirements are met for 4.3.2 review and revise Council’s Roadside maintained, enhanced animal, land and vegetation Vegetation Management Plan– included in the and protected management. Improvement Plan.

In addition, Council’s Vision and Mission are addressed in this infrastructure and asset management plan by:  Road classifications and priority given to tourism and freight routes for capital renewal and programed maintenance.  Road upgrades to be done in line with Levels of Service and road classification criteria.  Undertake regular asset valuations, updates and annual review of depreciation rates. Annually review service levels of assets and condition ratings for each asset category.

3.3 Legislative Requirements Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

3.4 Levels of Service Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

3.4.1 Customer Values Council’s Customer Values for Transport are set out in Table 5Table 6. Table 5: Customer Values

Customer Expected Trend Based Customer Values Current Feedback Satisfaction Measure on Planned Budget Roads – Safe and Customer Complaints Significant number of complaints Not anticipated to smooth driving and TOMM survey about road surfaces significantly change experience Roads – Appropriate Minimal number of complaints on Not anticipated to Customer Complaints of sight roadside vegetation significantly change Roads – Clear and Minimal number of complaints on Not anticipated to Customer Complaints accurate signage signs and line markings significantly change Moderate number of complaints Not anticipated to Footpaths clear Customer Complaints about hazards on footpaths and significantly change walking trails Sufficient pram/kerb Minimal complaints relating to Not anticipated to Customer Complaints ramps pram/kerb ramps significantly change Minimal complaints relating to Not anticipated to Sufficient carparking Customer Complaints quantity of carparks significantly change

3.4.2 Community Levels of Service Council’s Community Levels of Service for Transport are set out in Table 6. Table 6: Community Levels of Service

Performance Measure Expected Type of Trend Based Level of Service Current Performance Measure on Planned Budget Condition Sealed Roads – Provide Percentage of sealed 91% of sealed roads The planned smooth ride and roads in good or fair have a condition rating of budget is likely appropriate line of sight condition (per km) 3 fair or better to result in the overall 100% deterioration of

assets. 50%

0% Condition

Confidence levels High Medium Sheeted Roads - Provide Percentage of sheeted 82% of sheeted roads The planned smooth ride and roads in good or fair have a condition rating of budget is likely appropriate line of sight condition (per km) a fair or better to result in a 100% gradual increase in the condition of 50% assets

0% Condition

Confidence levels High Medium Footpaths and walking Percentage of footpaths 92% of footpaths have a The planned trails – Provide even and walking trails in good condition rating of fair or budget is likely surface with no tripping or fair condition (per m) better to result in an hazards 100% increase in the number of assets but the 50% overall deterioration of 0% existing Condition assets.

Confidence levels High Medium

3 Roads in good or fair condition are those that have a condition of 1, 2 or 3 based on the ‘Condition assessment and asset guidelines’, 2015.

Performance Measure Expected Type of Trend Based Level of Service Current Performance Measure on Planned Budget Road Signage – Signs Percentage of signs that Signs are replaced as No change 4 are clear and able to be are replaced as required required expected read Confidence levels Low Low Function Sealed Roads – Roads % of rural high use and 90% (by length) of rural Expected to are built to the standard township roads that are high use and township gradually suitable for that road sealed roads that are sealed increase class Confidence levels High Medium Sheeted Roads – Roads % of sheeted roads that 84% (by length) of Expected to are built to the standard have appropriate sheeted roads have gradually suitable for that road material5 appropriate material increase class Confidence levels Medium Medium Footpaths and walking % of township footpaths Majority of footpaths and No change trails – Separated from separated from vehicle walking trails are expected vehicle traffic traffic separate from vehicle traffic Confidence levels Low Low Capacity Roads – Roads are Road usage categories Majority of roads are Ongoing traffic classified correctly are accurate correctly classified counts will allow for ongoing improvement of the road classifications Confidence levels Low Medium Footpaths and walking % of Kingscote township 13% (by length) of Expected to trails – Footpaths are that has cement, paved Kingscote township that gradually provided in areas of high or spray seal footpaths has cement, paved or increase pedestrian usage spray seal footpaths Confidence levels Medium Low

4 Approximately 10% of signs have been replaced as a result of the fires however there are more within the fire scar that need replacing. 5 Minimum 150mm sheet/pavement remaining for Rural – Medium Use roads and minimum 100mm sheet/pavement remaining for Rural – Low or Very Low Use roads

3.4.3 Technical Levels of Service Table 7: Technical Levels of Service

Current Recommended Lifecycle Activity Purpose of Activity Activity Measure Performance6 Performance7 Acquisition Seal Township8 Budget allocation Budget allocation of Ideally these roads Roads and forecast time $100,0009 per year should be sealed means sealing of within 15 years – 100m of road per resulting in year will take 97 $482,00010 per year years however plan has been set for $150,000 per year Seal Rural High Use Budget allocation $1,200,000 for two No intention to seal Roads and forecast time years, no allocation remaining roads at after that this point Sheet existing roads Budget allocation No budget currently No budget unless that are unsheeted and forecast time allocated Council position changes. Kingscote Town Budget allocation Budget allocation of $50,000 per year Centre to have and forecast time $200,000 for one following means /Paved year Kingscote Town footpaths and Centre completed in remainder of 11 years. Kingscote to have This to continue for bitumen sealed the period to start on footpaths the remainder of Kingscote Budget $2,580,375 Total for $4,704,875 Total for the 10 years the 10 years Operation and are clean sweeping Ad hoc as required 4 times/year for maintenance frequency Kingscote Town Centre 2 times a year for other township roads. Cost unknown thus will retain current budget

6 Current activities related to Planned Budget. 7 Forecast required performance related to forecast lifecycle costs. 8 Township roads covers existing made roads within Kingscote, Parndana, Penneshaw and American River. 9 $25,000 of this is allocated per year for kerbing. This needs to be moved to the Stormwater AMP in a future revision. 10 This cost does not include stormwater kerbing and pipes.

Current Recommended Lifecycle Activity Purpose of Activity Activity Measure Performance6 Performance7 Vegetation Vegetation clearance Budget is sufficient Develop vegetation clearance maintained as per to cover current condition Roadside Vegetation vegetation clearing assessment process Management Plan requirements but no to allow for better data to ensure this scheduling of vegetation clearance. Once off cost.

Sheeted roads Frequency of Medium use roads – Better schedule the maintained in grading roads 4 times per year grading schedule to suitable condition suit the road material Low use roads –3 and condition. No times per year change to budget at Very Low use roads this stage. – once per year Roads - Existing Reactive service As no timeframes Develop standard for infrastructure requests are adopted, unable to responding to maintained to assessed and accurately monitor reactive service suitable condition completed within current performance requests. No change adopted timeframes to budget at this stage.

Footpaths and Frequency of routine Maintenance Quarterly inspections walking trails have maintenance currently conducted with scheduled clear access. (vegetation in response to maintenance. clearance – 2.5m customer requests or height clearance for staff observations width of path, ant treatment, erosion, grass clearance) Budget $21,711,552 Total $24,217,032 Total for the 10 years for the 10 years

Renewal Sealed roads Sealed roads are Resealing 7km per Resealing should renewed as due year, results in 37 occur when due years between (average 20 years reseals between reseals)

Sealed Roads Pavement renewed No budget currently Renewal of as due allocated to this pavement should occur when due to avoid need for complete road reconstruction if left too long.

Sheeted Roads Sealed roads are Resheeting 25km of Renewal should renewed as due road annually, occur when due means over 40 years (average 25 years between resheets. between resheeting)

Current Recommended Lifecycle Activity Purpose of Activity Activity Measure Performance6 Performance7 Low use roads not being renewed.

Footpaths Footpaths renewed No budget currently Renewal should as required allocated for renewal occur when due of footpaths

Guardrails Guardrails renewed No budget currently Renewal should as required allocated for renewal occur when due of footpaths

Budget $31,442,000 Total $35,656,672 Total for the 10 years for the 10 years f

Disposal Disposal of assets Disposal of assets No disposals No disposals no longer in use as per the IAMP planned planned Budget $0 total for the 10 $0 total for the 10 years years

4. FUTURE DEMAND

4.1 Demand Drivers and Forecast Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

4.2 Climate Change Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. The Climate Change Adaptation Plan (Resilient Hills and Coasts, 2016) also had a number of adaptation options that related specifically to transport. Table 8: Climate Change Adaptation Plan Actions

Adaptation Options Timeframe Council comment/action Management of the condition of sealed and unsealed roads in the face of altered climate change conditions such as increasing rainfall intensity and seal level rise, as well as increasing use Identify points of vulnerability in Now – 2026 The mapping tool from the Coastal Hazards Mapping the road network Project could be used to assist with this identification. Flood mapping has not been scheduled at this stage. Investigate internal capacity Now – ongoing Council currently investigating this through a Climate building regarding the impacts of Change Adaptation Governance Assessment. climate change on assets and procurement Incorporate design allowances 2021 - ongoing When transport upgrades or renewals occur, designs will for increases in extreme events need to give consideration to factors such as increased rainfall and storm surges to determine if raised road levels, increased or stormwater management are required. Any increase in costs to complete these works will result in less upgrades occurring for the allocated budget. Seal currently unsealed roads to 2021 - ongoing The extent to which this is done is limited by budget protect against stormwater restraints. Refer to the Technical Levels of Service for more damage information. More frequent bitumen resealing 2026 – ongoing The extent to which this is done is limited by budget and use of alternate road restraints. Refer to the Technical Levels of Service for more sealing surfaces information. Develop strategic water and 2026 – ongoing The prioritisation of rural road upgrades relates to the road freight points across the Island classifications, traffic counts and knowledge of freight routes with the aim to create traffic corridors around the Island. Develop alternate entry and exit 2026 – ongoing This would be led by farm owners however should be done points on farms in consultation with Council to ensure consideration is given to the road classifications.

4.3 Legislation change There are no anticipated legislation changes that will impact on Transport at the present time.

4.4 Changes in Technology Technology changes are forecast to have little impact on the delivery of services covered by this Transport Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan. Some of the potential technology changes include:  Greater use of in-situ recycling of pavement materials  Greater use of recycled materials  Introduction of synthetic binders for road surfacing treatment, as a result of crude oil shortages and bitumen products Council previously contracted Tonkins to complete a study on pavement material and stabilisations. At this stage, resheeting is the most cost effective method for maintaining roads.

4.5 Demand Management Plan Demand for new services will be managed through a combination of managing existing assets, upgrading assets where required and providing new assets to meet demand. Demand management practices include non-asset solutions, insuring against risk and managing failures. Demand impacts and opportunities identified to date for demand management are shown in Table 9. Table 9: Demand Management Plan

Demand factor Projection Impact on services Aging Increase in median age Increase in need for good quality Continue with staged upgrades population (currently 46) roads and footpaths in townships of township roads and upgrade to allow for elderly mobility of footpaths within Kingscote that are controlled and not reactive in accordance with Council’s Levels of Service and Council’s road classification criteria and Council’s Pedestrian Generator Plan for Townships. Develop Pedestrian Generator Plan for townships to assist with prioritisation of footpaths. Population Increase in people Increase in requests for unsealed Monitor road usage and review density wanting to live in roads to be upgraded and unmade use classifications and road remote areas road reserves to be opened up prioritisation due to sale of land zoned for rural Application of the Road Network living/housing. Extension Policy

Demand factor Projection Impact on services Agricultural Growth in bulk Potential for shift in the major Monitor agricultural practises practices production and routes used and increase in use of and road usage through ongoing potential for new B-double configuration freight traffic counts sectors (ie timber, vehicles / request for upgrade of Continue to review road use potatoes) existing rural roads to meet classifications and roads increased traffic volumes and/or prioritised for upgrade change in usage (ie Freight Application of the Road Network Route). Extension Policy Changes to Increase in tourists Increase in requests to upgrade Continue to review road use tourism as a visiting the Eastern roads on Eastern End of the Island classifications and roads result of the End of island prioritised for upgrade 2019/20 bushfires

4.6 New Assets from Growth The new assets required to meet growth and community expectations will be acquired from land developments and constructed by Council. As per Council’s Road Network Extension Policy “Council will not develop and construct new road nor upgrade an existing road unless the associated construction or upgrade costs are fully borne by the Applicant/s – or – the construction or upgrade is undertaken with the assistance of a significant financial co- contribution provided by the Applicant/s, they having proven the construction or upgrade is warranted within the Kangaroo Island Strategic Management Plan and, subsequently, having any related costs included in the current budget.” Based on the recommended technical levels of service the following new assets are considered in the forecast costs:  Seal of Township11 roads within 15 years  Seal Rural High Use roads within 10 years  Kingscote Town Centre to have Concrete/Paved footpaths within 10 years and remainder of Kingscote to have bitumen sealed footpaths The costs associated with these projects and the comparison to the proposed budget are discussed in section 5.5.

11 Township roads covers existing made roads within Kingscote, Parndana, Penneshaw and American River.

5. LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The lifecycle management plan details how Council plans to manage and operate the assets at the agreed service levels while optimising lifecycle costs.

5.1 Background Data 5.1.1 Physical Parameters The assets covered by this infrastructure asset management plan are shown in Table 10 below: Table 10: Physical Parameters, including age profile

Useful Life Average Asset Category Quantity12 Unit (years) Condition Roads 1341 km Formation Earthworks 1341 250 N/A Sub-Pavement / Sub-Sheet 1259 250 N/A Sheeted Surface 1080 km 15-30 Good Sealed Surface 261 km Pavement 261 km 18-40 Average Seal 268 km 80-100 Good Carparks Formation Earthworks 47 No. 400 N/A Sheeted Surface 35 No. 20 Average Sealed Surface Pavement 12 No. 30 Average Seal 12 No. 100 Good Footpaths 10439 metres Concrete 4312 metres 50 Good Paved 83 metres 50 Good Spray Seal 2064 metres 25 Good Mixed surface 11 metres 50 Average Guard Rails 6444.5 metres 50 Box Beam 25 metres 50 N/A

12 Intersections are not counted separately. For T junctions, it is assumed that the main length of the secondary road starts at the edge of the main road, thus there is no double counting of length. For cross roads, there will be some double counting of length. There are approximately 45 rural cross roads and 25 township cross roads resulting in a double counting of 700m which is considered minor given the overall network length of over 1,300km.

Useful Life Average Asset Category Quantity12 Unit (years) Condition Steel Tube 384 metres 50 N/A W-Beam 6035.5 metres 50 N/A Walking Trails 18038 m2 Base Course 18038 m2 100 Excellent Spray Seal 12134 m2 30 Excellent Pram Ramps 146 No. Standard Design 72 No. 50 Excellent Narrow design 74 No. 50 Good Signs (regulatory) 4538 No. 20 N/A

5.1.1.1 Service level hierarchy An initial was established in 2010 based on Managing Unsealed Roads in South Australia (TRB, 1993). Road reclassification projects were undertaken in 2015 and 2019. According to the Road Classification Guidelines in South Australia, all roads on Kangaroo Island would be considered Rural Roads, with the potential for them being either Rural Arterial Roads or Rural Local Roads. Rural Arterial Roads are those roads  That have a main function of forming the principal of connection for movements: o Between Capital Cities, key towns and Important Centres or o The National Land transport network, Major traffic routes or Freight Routes or Major Local Freight Routes o Currently classed as Class 1 and Class 2 Roads o To major tourist locations  That facilitate A-Double, B-Double, Performance Based Standards (PBS) or General Access heavy vehicle movements, with volumes in the order of 50 or more vehicles per day, not local in nature (ie through traffic)  That carry in the order of 300 vehicles or more per day (Annual Average Daily Traffic) of which a significant proportion are not local in nature (ie through traffic) This means that the majority of roads on Kangaroo Island would be classed as Rural Local Roads. This does not sufficiently distinguish between the different types of roads on Kangaroo Island. The table below outlines the road classifications, the criteria for determining the classification and the service level objective. Service hierarchy for transport assets other that roads have not yet been developed.

Table 11: Transport Asset Service Hierarchy

Service Hierarchy Description Service Level Objective Township Roads13 High use >800 vpd14 Sealed15 with kerbing16 Medium use 100-800 vpd Sealed with kerbing Low use <100 vpd Sealed with kerbing Rural Roads High use >100vpd or >10 Sealed17 heavy vpd Medium use 50-100 vpd or 5- Sheeted18 - 100mm base course, 150mm sub- 10 heavy vpd base, graded 4 times per year19 Low use 25-50 vpd Sheeted - 100mm base course, 100mm sub- base, graded 3 times per year Very low use <25 vpd Sheeted - 150mm compacted quarry rubble, graded once per year Footpaths, walking trails, To be developed in future iterations of this IAMP guardrails, carparks and pram/kerb ramps

13 This only includes Kingscote, Penneshaw, Parndana and American River Roads – all others are counted as rural roads. Some roads that are outside the Kingscote Township boundary have been counted as Township roads. 14 The vehicle counts provide an indication of the appropriate usage category however seasonal change in traffic counts can make this difficult. Council will take other factors into consideration when determining final road usage categories. For example creating travel corridors. 15 Roads that have earthworks to form the sub grade, topped with pavement (preferably 2 layers of crushed /processed road making base material) and sealed with spray seal, ac hot mix seal or paving. Some older roads may only have 1 layer of pavement. 16 Aim is for all township roads to eventually be sealed with kerbing, however priority is given to higher use roads. 17 “As a rough guide, it may be difficult to economically justify sealing a road carrying less than 100 vpd, whereas if it is carrying over 250 vpd it will probably be justified. In between these values is the ‘grey area’ where an economic assessment ………….. should be carried out to help make the decision when to seal (McLean 1997). When social benefits are taken into account, such as reducing dust emissions, these threshold traffic levels could be much lower.” (ARRB (Australian Road Research Board), 2009). 18 Roads that have earthworks to form the sub grade, a pavement layer and are topped with a sheeted surface (same material as that used for a pavement in Sealed roads). Some older roads may not have a layer of pavement. Also referred to as Unsealed Roads. 19 The quality and thickness of the material used for the sheeting, pavement and sealing is determined based on a number of factors including predicted usage and the geotechnical qualities of the sub grade and proposed sheet/pavement.

In some circumstances, a road may have been built to a standard higher than the minimum standard. In these cases, maintenance of these roads will generally be reflective of is actual service level objective. There may also be roads within a classification that currently do not meet the service level objective. These roads will be monitored for vehicle counts to confirm classification and if warranted, included on the plan for future upgrades. The asset database reflects the actual construction of the road rather than the service level objective and includes roads that are formed only20, access roads or unmade/natural formation21 – accessible or inaccessible. For more information refer to the Appendices: • Appendix B for Transport Rules for Finance and AssetFinda • Appendix D for Maps showing the Road Classifications and the Road Surfaces • Appendix E for road classifications cross section standard drawings

5.1.1.2 Traffic Counters Traffic counters are used to capture actual traffic count numbers, speed and vehicle class types (i.e. Class 1 standard short vehicles or cars through to Class 10 B-Double or heavy truck and trailer). They can be used to trigger a reclassification if the actual traffic count is higher or lower than previously thought.

5.1.2 Asset Capacity and Performance Council’s services are generally provided to meet design standards where these are available. Asset components where deficiencies in service performance are known are detailed in Table 12. Table 12: Service Deficiencies

Asset component Service Deficiency Council Comment Footpaths in Poor surface conditions with old spray This IAMP outlines an ongoing program for Kingscote seals and crusher dust footpaths providing the upgrade of footpaths focussing on high uneven surfaces with little traction. use areas within townships. The plan also includes a forecast of renewals due. Road pavement Older township roads were built with minimum With the current traffic volumes the roads pavement, not consistent with current are still operational. If the road were to fail standards or the road upgraded for another reason, it would be built to standard. Road Intersections between Sheeted and Sealed Council has been sealing the 30m intersections roads, sheeted road spilling gravel onto sealed approach of sheeted roads when they carriageway which may result in vehicles intersect with sealed roads. This will losing control. continue as funding is available.

20 Roads that have earthworks to form the sub grade with no additional material on top but the road corridor may have been widened, vegetation cleared and the road formed to shape. 21 Existing natural land and vegetation

Asset component Service Deficiency Council Comment Approaches to bridges and on gullies, the Council will consider sealing over bridges surfacing is potholing as would also protect the deck. The cost for this has not been included within this IAMP. Road corridor Roadside vegetation encroaching on road This is addressed through the ongoing carriageways limiting line of site and providing vegetation management program. no visibility of wildlife and/or driveways

The above service deficiencies have been identified through the data collection process, review of notifications and discussions with Council Staff.

5.1.3 Asset Condition Refer to Chapter 1 – General Statements for Asset Condition Rating System. Transport Assets are replaced based on condition rather than age. The condition of transport assets are currently monitored every five years based on the following criteria: • Sealed Roads and carparks: overall visual seal condition score with consideration given to oxidation, stripping and flushing and overall visual pavement condition score with consideration given to rutting, crocodile cracking and shape. • Sheeted roads and carparks: depth score and visual score with consideration given to corrugations, and loss of material • Footpaths and walking trails: overall visual condition score with consideration given to trip hazards, service development trenches and gaps • Guardrails: overall visual condition score • Pram/kerb ramps and Signs: no condition assessment. The following graphs show condition of transport assets inspected during the last revaluation.

0%

8% 16% 12% Very Good Very Good 6% Good Good 7% Average Average 41% Poor 12% Poor 35% 63% Very Poor Very Poor

Figure 3: Asset Condition - Sealed Roads Figure 4: Asset Condition - Sheeted Roads

The average useful life for pavements is between The condition of sheeted roads is generally very 80 to 100 years with seals lasting between 18 to 40 good due to the DPTI $2 million. Provided this years in depending on traffic volumes. As such

roads would be re-sealed two to three times before continues, sheeted roads will continue to maintain the pavement needs to be renewed with a new their standard. seal. As can be seen from the charts above, seals are generally in good condition however this is an area that will require work during this IAMP as many will be due for renewal at a similar time. In addition, the renewal of pavements will be an upcoming significant cost however it falls outside the forecast for this infrastructure and asset management plan.

0% 0%

9% 5% 8% Very Good Very Good 33% Good Good 27% Average Average 40% Poor Poor 59% Very Poor Very Poor 19%

Figure 5: Asset Condition - Carparks Figure 6: Asset Condition - Footpaths

Carparks are generally in good condition with Footpaths are generally in good condition with reasonable maintenance required to ensure they reasonable maintenance required to ensure they meet their intended useful life. meet their intended useful life. Walking trails were not inspected as these are all relatively new and known to be in good to very good condition. Age of the guardrails is currently used for determining replacement as unless there is an accident, it is a good indication of condition.

5.1.4 Asset Valuation The value of Transport assets as at 30 June 2020 covered by this infrastructure and asset management plan is summarised below in Table 13. Assets are valued at brownfield rates.

Table 13: Valuation Summary as at 30 June 2020

Asset Class Current Depreciable Accumulated Carrying Annual Replacement Amount Depreciation Amount Depreciation Cost (CRC) (WDV) Roads Formation Earthworks $280,893,073 $0 $0 $280,893,073 $0 Sub-Pavement / Sub- $42,576,193 $0 $0 $42,576,193 $0 Sheet Pavement (under seal) $10,893,868 $10,893,868 $2,905,888 $7,987,979 $133,433 Sheeted Road $29,849,402 $29,849,402 $7,941,559 $21,907,842 $1,237,947 Brick Paved Road $9,671 $9,671 $0 $9,671 $484 $11,292,360 $11,292,360 $5,539,479 $5,752,881 $535,828 Linemarking $21,760 $21,760 $0 $21,760 $1,088 Roads Total $375,536,326 $52,067,060 $16,386,926 $359,149,400 $1,908,780 Carparks Formation Earthworks $1,199,415 $0 $0 $1,199,415 $0 Pavement (under seal) $321,510 $321,510 $124,353 $197,157 $3,215 Sheeted Surface $877,905 $877,905 $442,567 $435,338 $43,895 Sealed Surface $183,720 $183,720 $92,009 $91,711 $6,124 Carparks Total $2,582,550 $1,383,135 $658,929 $1,923,621 $53,234 Footpaths Concrete $694,680 $694,680 $281,167 $413,513 $13,894 Paved $36,643 $36,643 $14,291 $22,352 $733 Spray Seal $556,780 $556,780 $199,108 $357,672 $11,136 Mixed surface $532,615 $532,615 $325,004 $207,611 $21,305 Footpaths Total $1,820,717 $1,820,717 $819,569 $1,001,148 $47,067 Guardrails Box Beam $25,000 $25,000 $42 $24,958 $500 Steel Tube $76,800 $76,800 $72,912 $3,888 $168 W-Beam $1,810,650 $1,810,650 $561,614 $1,249,037 $35,484 Guardrails Total $1,912,450 $1,912,450 $634,567 $1,277,883 $36,152 Walking Trails Base Course $901,900 $901,900 $171,361 $730,539 $9,019 Spray Seal $242,684 $242,684 $46,514 $196,170 $8,089 Walking Trails Total $1,144,584 $1,144,584 $217,875 $926,709 $17,108 Pram Ramps Trails

Asset Class Current Depreciable Accumulated Carrying Annual Replacement Amount Depreciation Amount Depreciation Cost (CRC) (WDV) Standard Design $86,400 $0 $0 $86,400 $0 Narrow Design $59,200 $0 $0 $59,200 $0 Pram Ramps Total $145,600 $0 $0 $145,600 $0 Signs $1,366,910 $0 $0 $1,366,910 $0 Transport Asset Total $384,509,137 $58,327,946 $18,717,867 $365,791,270 $2,062,342

5.1.5 Measures of asset consumption, renewal and upgrade Asset Sustainability Ratio Including $2m DPTI funding Capital Renewal Expenditure 2020/215 = $ 3,475,000 Depreciation Expense 2020/21 = $ 2,070,211 Therefore Asset Sustainability Ratio = 168% Council’s target is that this ratio should be greater than 90% and less than 110% over a rolling 3 year period. The high ratio relates to the lower layers of roads not being depreciated and indicates that under the current budget, assets are being renewed appropriately. Asset Consumption Ratio Depreciated Replacement Cost 2020/21 = $ 365,193,934 Current Replacement Cost 2020/21 = $ 385,982,012 Therefore Asset Consumption Ratio = 95% Council’s target is that this ratio should be greater than 40% and less than 80%. This ratio is indicative of the significant amount of lower layers not being depreciated. Asset Renewal Funding Ratio Including $2m DPTI funding IAMP projected 10 year expenditure = $ 35,656,672 LTFP projected 10 year expenditure = $ 31,442,000 Therefore Asset Renewal Funding Ratio = 88% This indicates that there is general alignment with the total budgets of this IAMP and the LTFP however further work needs to be done to more accurately align the costs with the correct asset categories and take into account any restrictions on the use of grant funding.

5.2 Risk Management Plan Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

Risk management assessments in previous plans identified a number of critical risks. Work has been undertaken to address some/all of these risks as summarised in Table 14.

Table 14: Risk Assessment Summary

Service or What can happen Risk Risk treatment Plan Residual Treatment Asset at Rating risk Costs Risk Road Funding Insufficient funding to High Continue to lobby to get $2.5 million Medium Existing salaries maintain / renew / annual funding. upgrade the existing Existing salaries 22 road network (due to Develop more robust asset High total kms of road vs management plan for roads that number of ratepayers). clearly shows how road would need to be managed both with and without the $2.5 million annual funding. Existing salaries

Review road classifications and High22 service levels (can they be lowered/reduced). 23 Road Increase in frequency High Identify areas at risk of flooding/storm High $15,000 infrastructure and intensity of climate surge and determine if levee banks or change events - ie road design change required. rainfall resulting in flooding of Construct levee banks and upgrade Medium Unknown roads/washing roads roads as identified through research. away; storm surges damaging coastal Maintain stormwater cross Medium Included in roads, fire damaging drains/ensure suitable capacity. Stormwater roads. IAMP Road Surface Surface degredation High Ensure regular patrol grading Medium if all Within existing – Unsealed and decreased level of undertaken and review grading implemented salaries Roads service (ie loose actually occurring and road surfaces material and to better plan/schedule future grading corrugations that can requirements. cause loss of traction and/or tyre blow outs) Ensure new unsealed roads or Unknown but due to insufficient renewal of roads constructed to our incorporated grading or poor quality standards (including material used into road costs material. meets quality assurance standards and road cross section meets design criteria). Within existing Prioritise and schedule renewals salaries based on condition and road classification

22 While these do not reduce the risk rating due to the amount of money involved, they are still important to action to assist with both Council understanding of the impacts and demonstrating the need for the funding to the Government. 23 Doesn't reduce risk but needs to be done prior to implementing the action which would reduce the risk.

Service or What can happen Risk Risk treatment Plan Residual Treatment Asset at Rating risk Costs Risk Road surface Accidents due to High Continue working with the Road High24 Within existing and signage visitors not being Safety Committee on signage around salaries familiar with local the island. conditions, driving on wrong side of road, Continue working with Sealink on Within existing multiple signs with driver education for tourists not used salaries varying designs and to unsealed roads. drivers not being able to read English Ensure signage meeds Australian Within existing Standards - ongoing signage review. maintenance budget Road signage Warning signage not High Rolling capital replacement program. Medium Within existing meeting with Australian maintenance Standards due to age budget of infrastructure and not having been replaced/upgraded Roads Complaints from High Ongoing communication with Medium Within existing residents and visitors residents as to which roads upgraded, salaries and as to the quality of the why not grading in summer, road use communication roads classifications, cost of upgrades. As budget above re: Road safety Committee and Sealink Road Surface Accident due to newly High Ensure new unsealed roads or High24 Unknown but - Unsealed constructed road has renewal of roads constructed to our incorporated Roads slippery surface due to standards (including material used into road costs weather, poor drainage meets quality assurance standards and suitability of and road cross section meets design materials used in criteria). construction Road Surface Accident due to newly High Ensure new unsealed roads or High24 Unknown but - Unsealed constructed road has renewal of roads constructed to our incorporated Roads slippery surface due to standards (including material used into road costs weather, poor drainage meets quality assurance standards and suitability of and road cross section meets design materials used in criteria). construction Roadside Accident resulting from High Manage roadside vegetation as per High24 $290,000 vegetation overgrowth of approved Roadside Vegetation annually (within vegetation reduces Management Plan existing width of transport maintenance corridor and decreases budget) line of sight Footpaths and Tripping due to uneven High Implement maintenance plan Medium if all Within existing Walking Trails surface, presence of including spraying. implemented maintenance weeds budget.

24 Risk will always be high due to potential for fatality in consequence however these actions will lower the likelihood.

Service or What can happen Risk Risk treatment Plan Residual Treatment Asset at Rating risk Costs Risk Respond to and action customer Within existing complaints re: hazards. maintenance budget.

Undertake condition inspections on Within 5 yearly footpaths (every 5 years) transport revaluation. Guardrails Vehicles falling from High Undertake condition assessment on High24 Included in road guardrails (every 5 years). transport revaluation every 5 years.

Prioritise and schedule guardrail To build into renewal based on the condition renewal and assessment. capital works based on outcome of assessment.

Roads - Vehicle accidents due High Undertake condition assessments on High24 Within 5 yearly Sealed roads to road surface roads (every 5 years). transport conditions revaluation. Prepare and implement 5-10 year Existing salaries road renewal program.

Prioritise and schedule renewals Existing salaries based on condition and road classification

Renewals Delay in renewals High Reassess condition of assets. Medium Within existing results in additional budget deterioration of sub layers (ie pavement Investigate options for funding Existing salaries under seal) renewal of assets that this may impact on.

5.3 Maintenance Plan

5.3.1 Maintenance Types Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. Typical reactive road maintenance activities include repair, repair of edge breaks, reinstatement and repair of large sealed pavement failure, crack sealing, repair of seal failure in pavement, removal of loose gravel, fixing faded or missing lines, vegetation maintenance, roadside furniture, repair of broken kerb and maintenance. Typical programmed road maintenance include road grading and linemarking which are moth undertaken on a cycle basis.

5.3.2 Maintenance Arrangements The following is a summary of maintenance arrangements:  Council uses its own workforce in conjunction with contractors to undertake the necessary works on the road and footpath network  Street cleaning will be completed by contractors.

5.3.3 Standards and Specifications Maintenance work is undertaken in accordance with the following Standards and Specifications:  Training Certificate 3 in Civil Construction  Pipe Laying in accordance with Cement & Concrete Association Standards  Signage in accordance with AS1742  ARRB Sealed and Unsealed Local Roads Manuals

5.3.4 Maintenance Expenditure Patterns Previous Maintenance expenditure is shown in Table 15. Table 15: Historic Maintenance Expenditure

2020/21 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 Budget Car Parks $44,229 $19,234 $16,618 $24,486 $20,032 $37,362 Footpaths & Walking Trails $102,038 $49,237 $45,147 $51,561 $98,350 $120,967 Roads - sealed $433,876 $444,812 $503,237 $328,104 $346,492 $336,373 Roads - unsealed $675,095 $735,253 $613,935 $673,526 $769,834 $717,104 Roads - vegetation $420,514 $228,878 $289,797 $248,757 $230,488 $287,831 Roads - patrol grading $473,827 $545,789 $563,259 $639,342 $636,779 $577,126 Street Cleaning $13,040 $22,015 $15,690 $12,909 $11,525 $17,261 Traffic Control (signage) $121,053 $68,993 $78,801 $86,190 $97,132 $77,132 TOTAL $2,283,672 $2,114,211 $2,126,485 $2,064,875 $2,210,631 $2,171,155

The figures above exclude depreciation and finance costs (ie interest on loans).25

5.3.5 Future Maintenance Expenditure Maintenance expenditure projections for the next ten years are detailed in Figure 7.

25 Note: In the previous iteration of this document, full cost allocation was also excluded. This has now been included.

$2,500,000

$2,000,000

Traffic Control (signage) Street Cleaning $1,500,000 Roads - patrol grading Roads - vegetation Roads - unsealed $1,000,000 Roads - sealed Footpaths and Walking Trails Car Parks

$500,000 Budget

$-

Figure 7: Maintenance Expenditure Projections

5.4 Renewal Plan Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. 5.4.1 Renewal Priority Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. The priority ranking criteria for Transport is detailed in Table 16.

Table 16: Renewal Priority Ranking Criteria

Criteria Weighting Condition No weighting. Assets initially on renewal date which is based on condition 26 Hierarchy Classification 50% High use 5 Medium use 4 Low use 3 Very low use 2 Function Classification27 20% Freight Regional Freight Route 5 Local Freight Route 3 Seasonal Freight Route 1 Tourism Regional Tourism Route 5 Local Tourism Route 3 Seasonal Tourism Route 1 Local Access Very high access (links townships) 5 High access (greater than 10 dwellings) 4 Medium access (between 5 – 10 dwellings) 3 Low access (less than 5 dwellings) 2 School Bus Route 3 Risk Management & Safety 20% Very High Risk 5 High Risk 4 Medium risk 2 Low risk 0 Economic Development Priority 10% Future development planned 5 Medium development potential 3 Low development potential 2 No development potential 0 TOTAL 100%

5.4.2 Renewal Standards Renewal work is carried out in accordance with the following Standards and Specifications:  Training Certificate III in Civil Construction  Pipe Laying in accordance with Cement & Concrete Association Standards

26 This approach is used due to the significant number of transport assets due for renewal that fall into this category. 27 Use the highest applicable number

 Signage in accordance with AS1742  ARRB Sealed and Unsealed Local Roads Manuals  Footpath Development Policy

5.4.3 Summary of future renewal expenditure Projected future renewal expenditure is summarised below in Figure 8. Figure 8: Projected Renewal Expenditure

$5,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $- 2020/2 2021/2 2022/2 2023/2 2024/2 2025/2 2026/2 2027/2 2028/2 2029/3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 Guardrails $- $104,850 $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Footpaths $- $- $- $- $85,267 $- $- $- $- $- Carparks $- $- $- $150,500 $- $- $- $- $- $251,055 Roads - DPTI Resheeting $2,800,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 $2,000,0 Roads - Resheeting $430,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 Roads - Resealing $335,000 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 $1,000,0 Budget $3,475,0 $2,392,0 $4,496,0 $2,308,0 $3,920,0 $2,431,0 $3,105,0 $3,105,0 $3,105,0 $3,105,0

5.4.4 Renewal Back log The revaluation process and associated condition inspections has recalculated renewal of transport assets going forward based on condition. As such there is no backlog as all assets have been programmed into future works.

5.4.5 Renewal Projection A detailed listing of transport renewals is provided in Appendix F. Due to the significant peaks in expenses, an average cost of renewal of roads has been allocated per year - $1,000,000 for sealed roads and $2,500,000 for sheeted roads. Any other renewals due during the timeframe of this IAMP have then been included in the relevant year. In setting the plan, the following things have been taken into consideration:  Road segments (approximately 2km in length) will be identified as requiring renewal in the asset data however it is not always practical and cost effective to only do segments across the island. Instead a whole of road of approach is preferred when looking at the road network strategically over the next 10 years.

 The DPTI $2million per annum program has prioritised roads based on their classification with higher use roads upgraded first.

5.5 New and Upgrade Plan 5.5.1 Selection Criteria Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. The priority ranking criteria for New and upgrade of Transport assets is the same as for renewal and detailed in Table 16.

5.5.2 Standards and Specifications Standards and specifications for new assets and for upgrade/expansion of existing assets are the same as those for renewal shown in Section 5.4.2.

5.5.3 Future upgrades/new assets expenditure Projected new and upgrade expenditure is summaries in Figure 9. The aim to upgrade township roads to seal has been factored into the upgrades however based on current budget, this will take more than 50 years. Upgrade of township footpaths has also been included however this will again take more than 50 years at the current amount proposed.

$1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $- 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 Signs $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Pram Ramps $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Walking Trails $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Guardrails $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Roads - Sheeted $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Roads - Sealed $1,272,8 $1,590,0 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $160,000 $160,000 $180,000 $125,000 $125,000 Footpaths $200,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $42,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 CarParks $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- Budget $1,472,8 $97,500 $247,500 $102,500 $102,500 $102,500 $102,500 $117,500 $117,500 $117,500

Figure 9: New and Upgrade Forecast

Upgraded assets and services will be funded from Council’s capital works program and grants where available. A detailed li A detailed listing of transport upgrades is provided in Appendix H. In addition Council has developed a Road Action Plan which details potential additional upgrades if additional grant funding becomes available. the action plan is based on major Freight, Tourism and Community usage as well as Strategic Fire Barriers and is available in Appendix I.

5.6 Disposal Plan Disposal includes any activity associated with disposal of a decommissioned asset including sale, demolition or relocation. At the time of writing this Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan, Council are considering the possible hand back of the rural sealed road network to be under State Government care and control. As this is only a consideration and there are no active discussions, this Infrastructure and Asset Management Plan has not identified any Transport assets to be disposed of.

6 FINANCIAL SUMMARY

This section contains the financial requirements resulting from all the information presented in the previous sections of this infrastructure and asset management plan.

6.1 Financial Statements and Projections The financial projections shown in Figure 10 are for operating (reactive and planned maintenance), capital renewal expenditure and capital upgrade expenditure28. Appendix B shows the actual figures used to obtain this graph.

$6,000,000

$5,000,000

$4,000,000 Capital Renewal $3,000,000 Capital Upgrade $2,000,000 Operating Costs

$1,000,000

$- 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30

Figure 10: Financial Projections - Operating, Capital Upgrade and Capital Renewal

6.1.1 Sustainability of Service Delivery Refer to Chapter 1 – General Statements for discussion on key indicators for financial sustainability. There are two key indicators for financial sustainability that have been considered in the analysis of the services provided by this asset category, these being long term life cycle costs and medium term costs over the 10 year financial planning period.

Long Term – Life Cycle Cost Table 17: Summary of life cycle costs

Average Average Life cycle Annual Annual Lifecycle Asset Class Sustainability Lifecycle Lifecycle Gap Index Cost Expenditure $4,656,254 $3,603,153 $1,053,101 77% $4,656,254

28 Note: due to the large scale of potential upgrades, the proposed capital upgrade expenditure has been rationalised.

Medium term – 10 year financial planning period The projected asset renewals versus the planned renewal expenditure in the capital works program in the 10 year planning period is shown in Figure 11 (including $2m DPTI funding)

$5,000,000

$4,500,000

$4,000,000

$3,500,000

$3,000,000

$2,500,000

$2,000,000

$1,500,000

$1,000,000

$500,000

$- 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30

Capital Renewal Planned Renewal Expenditure

Figure 11: Projected Asset Renewals – Including $2m DPTI funding

Table 18 shows the annual and cumulative funding gap between projected and planned renewals for Transport assets. Table 18: Accumulative Renewal Funding Gap Planned Renewals Projected Renewal Year (including Cumulative Gap Renewals Funding Gap $2m DPTI funding) 2020/21 $3,475,000 $3,565,000 -$90,000 -$90,000 2021/22 $2,392,000 $3,604,850 -$1,212,850 -$1,302,850 2022/23 $4,496,000 $3,500,000 $996,000 -$306,850 2023/24 $2,308,000 $3,650,500 -$1,342,500 -$1,649,350 2024/25 $3,920,000 $3,585,267 $334,733 -$1,314,617 2025/26 $2,431,000 $3,500,000 -$1,069,000 -$2,383,617 2026/27 $3,105,000 $3,500,000 -$395,000 -$2,778,617 2027/28 $3,105,000 $3,500,000 -$395,000 -$3,173,617 2028/29 $3,105,000 $3,500,000 -$395,000 -$3,568,617 2029/30 $3,105,000 $3,751,055 -$646,055 -$4,214,672

Providing services in a sustainable manner will require matching of projected asset renewals to meet agreed service levels with planned capital works programs and available revenue. The gap between projected asset renewals, planned asset renewals including $2m from DPTI and funding indicates that further work is required to manage required service levels and funding to mitigate the funding gap.

6.2 Funding Strategy Projected expenditure identified in Section 6.1 is to be funded from Council’s operating and capital budgets. The funding strategy is detailed in the Council’s 10 year long term financial plan. To achieve the financial strategy Council will require:-  $2m from DPTI.  Continued revision of road classifications.  Continued revision of valuation and forecasting parameters, including condition end values.  Continued revision of levels of service, including grading patterns, roadside vegetation management and sealed road renewals.

6.3 Valuation Forecasts Asset values are forecast to increase due to new assets created when township streets are sealed with kerbs, roads upgraded from construction and from assets constructed by land developers and others and donated to Council. The Current Replacement Forecast is shown below in Figure 12.

$450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 $-

Figure 12: Current Replacement Cost Forecast

Depreciation expense values are forecast in line with asset values as shown in Figure 13.

$2,500,000

$2,000,000

$1,500,000

$1,000,000

$500,000

$-

Figure 13: Depreciation Forecast

The depreciated replacement cost (current replacement cost less accumulated depreciation) will vary over the forecast period depending on the rates of addition of new assets, disposal of old assets and consumption and renewal of existing assets as shown below in Figure 14.

$400,000,000

$350,000,000

$300,000,000

$250,000,000

$200,000,000

$150,000,000

$100,000,000

$50,000,000

$-

Figure 14: Depreciated Replacement Cost Forecast

6.4 Key Assumptions made in Financial Forecasts Refer section 1. Key assumptions made specific to this infrastructure and asset management plan are:

 Asset data for Transport assets was collected by Kangaroo Island Council staff in 2019/20 and the information in this IAMP incorporates the latest data.  The useful life and replacement costs of the assets were determined by PPP (Public Private Property) in June 2020. Purchase cost rather than replacement cost is used for assets acquired after this date

7 ASSET MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

7.1 Accounting/Financial Systems Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

7.2 Asset Information System Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

7.3 Information Flow Requirements and Processes Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

7.4 Standards and Guidelines Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

8 PLAN IMPROVEMENT AND MONITORING

8.1 Performance Measures Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

8.2 Improvement Plan Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements. The asset management improvement plan generated from this infrastructure and asset management plan is shown in Table 19. Table 19: Improvement Plan

Task Update Proposed Estimated Task Area No Timeline Cost 1 Development of a disposal plan No longer a priority N/A - - and no current intent to dispose of any transport assets 2 Monitoring and ongoing review of Levels of service Complete - - Levels of Service developed, review incorporated into the IAMP process 3 Review of Asset Accounting Policy Complete - - 4 Implement Asset Management Policy Delayed Dec 2023 Within - current budget Within current budget 5 Borrow Pit Management Plan to be Delayed Dec 2024 - developed, including pit remediation to secure suitable road building materials for the long term. 6 Finalisation of the Pedestrian Delayed Dec 2025 Within Maintenance Generator Plan for townships existing salaries 7 Consider reclassification of Car parks These are now both Complete - - / Access Roads as a sub class of included in the assets in the Transport Infrastructure IAMP Asset Management Plan 8 Transport Revaluation – 2019/2020 New Complete - - 9 Review and revise Council’s New Dec 2021 Within Roadside Vegetation Management current Plan budget

12 Develop more detailed 3, 10 and 20 New Jun 2021 Within year forward plans for renewal, in current particular for roads, specifying road budget renewal priorities 13 Determine costings for street New Dec 2021 Within sweeping recommended current performance budget 14 Develop standard for responding to New Jun 2023 Within reactive service requests current budget 15 Develop joint asset management New Dec 2023 Within plans with government agencies for current road and marine infrastructure budget 16 Obtain funding to undertake a road New Jun 2024 Within safety audit and plan – to achieve current national safety standards (including budget signage) for all Island roads 17 Develop a more sophisticated Asset New Jun 2024 Within Management Plan that more clearly current shows the division of costs between budget asset types and how the transport network would be impacted without the external funding. Include consideration of sealing over bridges 18 Review existing data on grading New Jun 2024 $5,000 Maintenance schedules and road conditions to develop more sophisticated grading schedule. 19 Transport Revaluation – 2024/2025 New Jun 2025 $20,000 Maintenance 20 Develop condition assessment New Jun 2025 $5,000 Maintenance process for vegetation to be completed during valuations to allow for better scheduling of vegetation clearance 21 Transport Revaluation – 2029/2030 New Jun 2030 $20,000 Maintenance

8.3 Monitoring and Review Procedures Refer Chapter 1 – General Statements.

9 REFERENCES

ARRB (Australian Road Research Board). (2009). Unsealed Roads Manual, Guidelines to good practice. Kangaroo Island Council. (2007). Roadside Vegeation Management Plan. Retrieved from https://www.kangarooisland.sa.gov.au/council/plans/vegetation Kangaroo Island Council. (2014). Road Network Extension Policy. Kangaroo Island Council. (2020). Kangaroo Island Council Strategic Plan 2020-2024. Retrieved from https://www.kangarooisland.sa.gov.au/council/plans/strategic-management-plan-2020-24 KI Regional Transport Strategy Steering Group. (2007). Kangaroo Island Regional Transport Strategy. Local Roads Advisory Committee for the Determination of Road Classification in South Australia. (2018). Road Classification Guidelines in South Australia. NRSS Inquiry Panel. (2018). Inquiry into the National Road Safety Strategy 2011-2020. Resilient Hills and Coasts. (2016). The Climate Change Adaptation Plan for the Adelaide Hills, Fleurieu Peninsula and Kangaroo Island. Retrieved from https://www.kangarooisland.sa.gov.au/community/rhc Southern & Hills Local Government Association. (2015). 2020 Transport Plan, 2015 Update. TOMM Kangaroo Island Committee. (2019). Visitor Exit Survey 2018/2019. Retrieved from https://www.tourkangarooisland.com.au/ TRB. (1993). Managing Unsealed Roads in South Australia.

APPENDIX A – Transport Planned operating, capital renewal and capital upgrade expenditure

2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 Operating $37,362 $37,362 $37,362 $37,362 $37,979 $37,362 $37,362 $37,362 $37,362 $37,979 Capital Renewal $3,565,000 $3,604,850 $3,500,000 $3,650,500 $3,585,267 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,751,055 Capital Upgrade $1,472,875 $1,640,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $202,000 $210,000 $230,000 $175,000 $175,000 TOTAL COSTS $5,075,237 $5,282,212 $3,737,362 $3,887,862 $3,823,246 $3,739,362 $3,747,362 $3,767,362 $3,712,362 $3,964,034

APPENDIX B – Transport Rules for Finance and Asset Finda

The following sub-department have been included in all finance calculations:  004 Car Parks  021 Kerbs and Paths (halve costs)  041 Roads – sealed  042 Roads – unsealed  043 Roads – vegn  045 Roads – patrol grading  049 Street Cleaning  052 Traffic control (linemarking)  053 Traffic Control (signage) The following expenses have been excluded from all finance calculations:  Depreciation  Bank charges  General Interest Expenses  Capital Cost Allocation

Asset Finda: The following rules have been applied when entering data into Asset Finda:  Communities Assets are allocated to the community based on their location and the Communities used are consistent with the Departments used in finance o Township: o Rural: . American River . Dudley . Baudin Beach . MacGillivray . Emu Bay . Redbanks . Island Beach . Stokes . Kingscote/Brownlow . Vivonne . Nepean Bay . Wisanger . Penneshaw . Western Districts . Parndana . Vivonne Bay

 Asset Classes: Assets are divided into 7 asset classes (Roads, Carparks, Footpaths, Guardrails, Pram Ramps, Signs, Walking Trails) with the following asset Types and numbers (refer to table on next page)  Categories: Assets are allocated to the category based on which asset class they are in: o Roads – Township Roads or Rural Roads (based on their location) o Carparks – Carparks o Footpaths – American River Footpaths, Emu Bay Footpaths, Kingscote Footpaths, Parndana Footpaths, Penneshaw Footpaths

o Guardrails – Guardrails o Pram Ramps - American River Pram Ramps, Kingscote Pram Ramps, Parndana Pram Ramps, Penneshaw Pram Ramps o Signs – Guide Sign, Hazard Sign, Regulatory Sign, Warning Sign, Other Sign o Walking Trails - American River Walking Trails, Kingscote Walking Trails, Penneshaw Walking Trails  Notes: o Contract IDs are the finance GL code o Condition rating criteria as per 2020 Revaluation

Asset Class Asset Finda Examples of Asset Types Asset Numbers Template Roads Transport Formation, Sub Pavement, Pavement, Sheeted RRRRRSSS_X Surface, Sealed Surface

Asset number – based on road ID, segment number and layer

Transport_Carparks Transport Formation, pavement, sheeted surface or sealed AX_X.XX surface

Asset number – based on the ID of the land the carpark is located on.

Transport_Footpaths Transport Footpaths FPXXX

Transport_Guardrails Transport Guardrails GRXXXX

Transport_PramRamps Transport Narrow or Standard design BRXX

Transport_Signs Transport Road signs SNXXXXXX

Transport_WalkingTrails Transport Base Course and sealed surface AX_X.XX Asset number – based on the ID of the land the walking trail is located on.

APPENDIX C – Strategic Document Recommendations

Strategic Note/Recommendations Council Comments Document Business Continuity Road access and serviceability (Arterial & Collector) - Max Acceptable Outage = 4 hours Council’s procedure is to inspect the Plan road and either repair or install a detour until road is again accessible. Consider developing map which highlights roads most critical in terms of impact if not There are too many potential available and alternate routes to be used in BC scenarios (Nov 2018) scenarios to develop a map. Procedure above of adding detour signs specific to the location of the issue is considered sufficient.. Kangaroo Island Develop fit-for-purpose road and port facilities to support the export of woodchips and grain. Council would be involved in Plan discussions with proponents on this. Upgrade tourism roads on Kangaroo Island. This is ongoing. The priorisation criteria for the upgrade and renewal of roads includes a factor for tourism. Paradise Girt By Either designate the sealed road loop a ‘state road’ or provide State funding assistance of Council are in discussions on the Sea equivalent value to Council. future maintenance of the state roads. KIFA and KI Council to review local road network; define 3 categories for local road; KIFA Road classifications process complete and KI Council in conjunction with DTEI investigate options to reduce the maintenance and the upgrade of Sheeted Roads to costs of the unsealed road network on KI and improve road quality. a better standard should result in lower maintenance costs in regards to grading frequency required. Local government 3) Council engage with State Government to express its concern over the particular impact Council are currently in discussions on Kangaroo Island on kangaroo Island of the vegetation management requirements of the native Vegetation with Native Vegetation Council about Act 1991 as they apply to road reserves.

Strategic Note/Recommendations Council Comments Document today and updating the Roadside Vegetation Tomorrow Management Plan. 6) Council seek the support of its regional LGA (Southern and Hills LGA) to apply for Council currently has funding to funding assistance through the Special Local Roads Program to upgrade tourist roads on upgrade Wedgewood Road and Kangaroo Island Hickmans Road. Once this project is finished, Council will consider other roads that could potentially be upgraded via this funding. 7) Council closely monitor usage and the destination of users of the South Coast Road and This is not currently a priority for the West End over time and its own expenses association with the ongoing Council. necessary maintenance and upgrade of these key local roads. This will assist Council’s case in any future dialogue with the State about the classification of these roads. LGA – Risk 2c) Council must develop and adopt an infrastructure and asset management plan for a This IAMP starts this process, the Evaluation period of at least 10 years that covers the management and maintenance of roads and improvement plan allows for the Guidance footpaths. development of a more sophisticated The plan should include identification of the assets, assessment and prioritisation o the plan over time. assets for inspection, repair and maintenance (this should consider asset and infrastructure use, traffic or visitation levels, condition, safety, and other legislative requirements, etc) An issue log or register should be in place that tracks identified issues that arise over time with the specific piece of infrastructure or asset and this should link back to the asset plan in terms of whether an adjustment is required to the current assessment and prioritisation level. 2d) The inspection and maintenance priorities and timeframes [for inspection of roads and This IAMP starts this process, the footpaths] should be identified in the asset management plan and/or within the issue log as improvement plan allows for the a corrective action. development of a more sophisticated This should be supported by a process at workgroup level to guide them in relation to what plan over time. is to be inspected, what timeframes are for this and who is responsible for doing this.

Strategic Note/Recommendations Council Comments Document The workers responsible should have documentation and training to enable them to make a consistent assessment of the road or footpath, covering all the required criteria, including documenting any changes to the road (e.g. alteration or reinstatement of the road). 2e) The inspection and maintenance priorities and timeframes [for roads] should be This IAMP starts this process, the identified in the asset management plan and/or within the issue log as a corrective action. improvement plan allows for the A maintenance and repair schedule should be developed, which takes into consideration development of a more sophisticated the inspection findings (as per previous question), reported issues or faults, the use of the plan over time. road (including traffic volumes, proximity to public areas, use by vulnerable groups or those In addition, Council are in the process with special needs) and also any other identified issues with the road (e.g. original design of rolling out the mobile version of issues, reported issues or incidents in the same location, etc.) AssetFinda which, once set up, will This should be supported by a process at workgroup level to guide them in relation to what have the capability of documenting is to be maintained or repaired, what the timeframes are for this and who is responsible for issues as found and potentially then doing this. scheduling future works. The workers responsible should have documentation and training to enable them to conduct the appropriate maintenance and/or repair activities. There should be a process to update the asset management plan with any changes once the repair/maintenance has been completed. 2f) The inspection and maintenance priorities and timeframes [for footpaths] should be This IAMP starts this process, the identified in the asset management plan and/or within the issue log as a corrective action. improvement plan allows for the A maintenance and repair schedule should be developed, which takes into consideration development of a more sophisticated the inspection findings (as per previous question), reported issues or faults, the use of the plan over time. footpath (including traffic volumes, proximity to public areas, use by vulnerable groups or In addition, Council are in the process those with special needs) and also any other identified issues with the footpath (e.g. of rolling out the mobile version of original design issues, numerous reported issues or incidents, etc.) AssetFinda which, once set up, will This should be supported by a process at workgroup level to guide them in relation to what have the capability of documenting is to be maintained or repaired, what the timeframes are for this and who is responsible for issues as found and potentially then doing this. scheduling future works. The workers responsible should have documentation and training to enable them to conduct

Strategic Note/Recommendations Council Comments Document the appropriate maintenance and/or repair activities. There should be a process to update the asset management plan with any changes once the repair/maintenance has been completed.

APPENDIX D – Road Classification Maps

APPENDIX E – Road Cross Section Standard Drawings

RURAL SHEETED ROAD – TYPICAL CROSS SECTION – MEDIUM USE ROAD

RURAL SHEETED ROAD – TYPICAL CROSS SECTION –LOW USE ROAD

RURAL SHEETED ROAD – TYPICAL CROSS SECTION – VERY LOW USE ROAD

APPENDIX F – Renewal Priorities – Roads

Year Sealed Roads DPTI Program Sheeted Roads 2020/21 Township: North Coast Road $800,000 Township: Murray St, Kingscote $20,000 Redbanks Road (part) $1,000,000 North West Tce, The Parade, High St, Second St, $70,000 Addison St, Kingscote (carparks) $10,000 Turkey $1,000,000 First St, Brownlow Faile Ct, WaraweeRd & Nelcebe Ct, American River $35,000 Buick St & Hawthorn Ave, Emu Bay $15,000 Kingscote Tce & Commercial St, Kingscote $10,000 Rural: Rural: Birchmore Rd (seg 30, 35,55) $85,000 Willson River Rd (seg 30) $100,000 Seal Bay Rd (seg 5,10) $60,000 Moores Rd (seg 10,15) $80,000 South Coast Rd (seg 80-100) $110,000 East West One (seg TBC) $80,000 Fire Damaged reseal $200,000 Fire Damaged patch repairs $200,000 $545,000 $2,800,000 $530,000 2021/22 Township: Jetty Road (4km) Township: Cygnet Rd, Kingscote $10,000 Cape Borda Rd (part to Shackle Rd) Ocean View Drive, Nepean Bay $30,000 (12.5km) Chapman Tce, Kingscote $10,000 Rural:

Dauncey St, Kingscote $15,000 Acacia Dr, Lovers Lane and Tinsmith Rd $120,000 Third St, Brownlow $10,000 Rose Cottage Rd (seg 5) $60,000 , Kingscote $15,000 Porter Rd and Keith Rd $30,000 Rural: Jews Hwy (seg 5) $60,000 Playford Highway (seg 270-310) $350,000 Thomas Rd (seg 5) $50,000 South Coast Road (seg 105-195) $450,000 Margaries Rd (seg 5) $65,000 North Coast Road (seg 5-15) $125,000 Muston Rd (seg 5) $40,000 Hillview Rd (seg 10) $10,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $475,000 2022/23 Township: South Coast Rd (20km) Township: Drew St, Kingscote $10,000 None scheduled Franklin St, Kingscote $15,000 Tangara Drive, American River $30,000 Nepean Avenue, Kingscote $10,000 Jones St, Parndana $15,000 Rural: Rural: Elsegood Rd (seg 5-15) $85,000 North Coast Road (seg 120-135) $260,000 Birchmore Rd (seg 5-25) $215,000 Mount Stockdale Rd (seg 5,15) $160,000 Stokes Bay Rd (seg 5-15) $170,000 Gosse Ritchie Rd (seg 10) $80,000 Playford Highway (seg 315-340) $175,000 South Coast Road (seg 200-240) $275,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000

Year Sealed Roads DPTI Program Sheeted Roads 2023/24 Township: Gum Creek Rd (14km) Township: To Be Confirmed Miller Rd (10km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2024/25 Township: Barretts Rd (8.2km) Township: To Be Confirmed Seagers Rd (part - 12km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2025/26 Township: Seagers Rd (part - 7km) Township: To Be Confirmed Gap Rd, Ropers Rd (15km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2026/27 Township: Moores Rd (11.7km) Township: To Be Confirmed Mount Taylor Rd (part – 10km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2027/28 Township: Mount Taylor Rd (part – 12km) Township: To Be Confirmed Timber Creek Rd (13km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2028/29 Township: Hanson Bay Rd (5km) Township: To Be Confirmed East West One (15km) To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000 2029/30 Township: East West One (20km) Township: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed Rural: Rural: To Be Confirmed To Be Confirmed $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $500,000

The order of these may vary based on ongoing assessment of condition of the assets.

APPENDIX G – Renewal Priorities – Other Transport Assets

Year Amount Asset Category Details 2021/22 $ 104,850 Guardrails Replacement of 30 guardrails totalling 464m, Stokes bay, Wisanger, Newland, Macgilivray, Dudley, Penheshaw and Kingscote 2025/26 $ 150,500 Carparks Carparks at Kingscote Tidal Pool, Hanson bay, Kingscote Information Bay, Airport Corner and Parndana Town Hall 2026/27 $ 85,267 Footpaths Reseal of footpaths in Kingscote – Daucney St, Commercial St, Wheelton St, Franklin St and Murray St 2029/30 $ 251,055 Carparks Carparks at Kingscote Cemetery, Windmill Monument, Western River, Reeves Point, Point Ellen: Note: Condition of these will be assessed closer to this date. TOTAL $ 591,672

APPENDIX H – Upgrade Priorities

Asset Class New/Upgrades Cost Scheduled Estimate Year Roads - Sealed Wedgewood/Hickmans $1,212,875 2020/2021 American River - Bimberta / Moreanda $60,000 2020/2021 Wedgewood/Hickmans $1,440,000 2021/2022 Penneshaw - The Lane $150,000 2021/2022 Penneshaw - The Lane $150,000 2022/2023 Penneshaw - The Lane $150,000 2023/2024 Penneshaw - The Lane $150,000 2024/2025 Kingscote - Torrens Street, Stokes Court, KI Yacht Club $160,000 2025/2026 Access Kingscote - Karatta Tce (Kohinoor to Campbell) $160,000 2026/2027 Parndana - Wheaton Street $180,000 2027/2028

Sealing of unsealed High Use Rural Roads - Elsegood $125,000 2028/2029 Road, Dune Road and Jetty Road $125,000 2029/2030 Roads - Sheeted Not yet Sealing of unsealed High Use Rural Roads - Elsegood $2,000,000 Road, Dune Road and Jetty Road scheduled CarParks No specific upgrades planned at this time - - Footpaths Kingscote Footpaths - Murray Street $50,000 2020/2021 Parndana Footpaths $50,000 2020/2021 Penneshaw Footpaths $50,000 2020/2021 American River Footpaths $50,000 2020/2021 Kingscote Footpaths - Murray Street, Telegraph Road $50,000 2021/2022 Kingscote Footpaths - Telegraph Road $50,000 2022/2023 Kingscote Footpaths - Telegraph Road $50,000 2023/2024 Kingscote Footpaths - Telegraph Road $50,000 2024/2025 Kingscote Footpaths - Chapman Terrace, Cygnet Road $42,000 2025/2026 Kingscote Footpaths - Osmond Street $50,000 2026/2027 Kingscote Footpaths - Osmond Street $50,000 2027/2028 Kingscote Footpaths - Franklin Street $50,000 2028/2029 Kingscote Footpaths - Franklin Street $50,000 2029/2030

Asset Class New/Upgrades Cost Scheduled Estimate Year Guardrails Included in Ongoing as part of road upgrades road Ongoing upgrade cost Walking Trails To be Not yet Parndana walking trail determined scheduled

To be Not yet Penneshaw Foreshore Walking Trail determined scheduled Pram Ramps No specific upgrades planned at this time - - Signs No specific upgrades planned at this time - -

APPENDIX I – Road Action Plan