DOCSLIB.ORG

Procopius on Theodora

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DOI 10.1515/bz-2020-0034 BZ 2020; 113(3): 769–788 Sergi Grau and Oriol Febrer Procopius on Theodora: ancient and new biographical patterns Abstract: The Anékdota or Secret History of Procopius of Caesarea tends to raise perplexity among scholars for different reasons,particularlythe fact thatacour- tier wrote this work as well as the Buildings,aclear praise of Justinianthrough his constructions and foundations, and the Wars,inthe most canonical historio- graphical tradition. It is apparent that the Secret History,asitisusually acknowl- edged, is related to the tradition of the invective and the pamphlet,eventothe earlier classic iambography, but we should try to answer the question with the same analyticaltools that have been applied in recent years to the study of an- cient biography, whencethe author takes inspiration, especiallyfor the portrait of empress Theodora.Herewehaveidentified, alongside the ancientbiograph- ical patterns of the classicaltradition, new ones, mostlyinversions of contempo- rary hagiographical narratives. Adressen: Dr.Sergi Grau and Oriol Febrer,DepartmentofClassical, Romanic and Semitic Philology,Section of Greek Philology,Faculty of Philology and Communication, University of Barcelona,GranVia de les CortsCatalanes, 585 08007 Barcelona, Spain;[email protected] and [email protected] Around 550,¹ acouple of yearsafter Theodora’sdeath, Procopius of Caesarea composed acontroversial yetrather minor work. Itsinterpretation has signifi- Apreliminaryversion of thispaper waspresented at the XVIII Congress on Byzantine Studies, promoted by the Spanish Society of Byzantine Studies (SEB)and held at the UniversityofBar- celona in January .Wewish to thank the organisers,and speciallyProf.Ernest Marcos, for their kind reception. We also thank the anonymous refereeswho had informed thispaper for their useful suggestions. The research is partofthe project entitled La construccióndel pasado en la Grecia arcaica yclásica: mecanismos compositivos, genealogíasycatálogos,directed by Jesús Carruescoand Xavier Riu, and financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PID–GB-I). It is also registered in the SGR research group Logo- tekhnia. Estudis de culturagrega antiga,directed by Xavier Riu ( SGR ). The possible datesfor the SecretHistory are / (J.Haury,Procopiana. Augsburg ; B. Rubin,Prokopios vonKaisareia. Stuttgart [= RE ]; A. Cameron,Procopius and the sixth century.London ;G.Greatrex,The dates of Procopius’ works. BMGS , , 770 Byzantinische Zeitschrift Bd. 113/3, 2020: I. Abteilung cantlyshaped the modern reception of emperor Justinian, his empire and his en- tire period: the Anékdota or Secret History (Historia arcana,inLatin),asitisusu- allyknown among scholars. Itsauthor criticises merciless Justinianand Belisar- ius, the famous general, alongside their wives, Theodoraand Antonina. However,the biographical patterns adopted by Procopius to shape his critique are by no means perspicuousand need to be addressed again.² As we wish to elucidatethrough these lines, Procopius, awell-trained and excellentlynurtured author,makesuse, alongside traditional patterns alreadyfound in classicalbi- ography – and, as far as we are aware, not yetidentifiedbyotherscholars –, of new ways to conveyhis enmity towardsthe reigning couple. Procopius’ education Procopius, born in Caesarea Palaestinensis ca. 500 AD to awealthyfamilyfrom this active and multicultural city,whereChristians of different denominations, pagans, Jews and Samaritans livedtogether,although not always in good har- mony, receivedagood education, basedonthe readingofclassical authors, rhet- oric, jurisprudence and asuperficial knowledge of philosophicalideas.³ This up- bringingallowed him to pursue acareer in public service and to apply for administrative posts that granted rich provincials certain privileges. His works show an accurate acquaintance with legal proceedings, although he conceals their arid formulation and technical languagewith amore florid literary style, –;J.A.S.Evans,The dates of Procopius’ works: arecapitulation of the evidence. GRBS , , –;J.Signes Codoñer,Prokops Anecdota und Justinians Nachfolge. JÖB , , –;A.Kaldellis,The date and structureofProkopios’ SecretHistory and his pro- jected work on Church History. GRBS , , –)and / (R.Scott,Justinian’s coinageand Easterreforms and the date of the Secret History. BMGS , , –; idem, Justinian’snew ageand the second coming,inR.Scott,Byzantine chronicles and the sixth cen- tury.Farnham/Burlington ;B.Croke,Procopius’ SecretHistory:rethinkingthe date. GRBS , , –). We consider the first one to be moreplausible, mostlyafter Kaldellis’ re- sponse (Kaldellis, GRBS , , –)toCroke’sobjections (Croke, GRBS , ), that has not convinced Scott,Justinian’snew age ,however.The sole importance of the char- acterisation of Theodora, whopassed away in ,asanelement of invective makes difficulta latedatingofthe work. For Kaiserkritik in the other works of Procopius,see, especially, J. Signes Codoñer,Kaiserk- ritik in Prokops Kriegsgeschichte. Electrum (), –. G. Greatrex,Perceptions of Procopius in recentscholarship. Histos (), – and, especially, G. Greatrex,L’historien Procope et la vie àCésarée au vie siècle, in G. Greatrex / S. Janniard(eds.), Le monde de Procope/The World of Procopius.Paris , –. S. Grau /O.Febrer, Procopius on Theodora 771 with an antiquarian taste.⁴ The rhetorical usagesthat characterise his style sit- uate him at the end of the so-called Third Sophistic, mostlybecause of his Attic- ism and the use of canonical authors typical of rhetorical handbooks. Those who exerted most influenceonProcopius were Homer,Herodotus and, by far,Thucy- dides, but he shows arather in-depth understanding,beyond the simple quote of aparticularpassage, of the biographies of the great men of Greece⁵ – such as Themistoclesand Alexander the Great.Healso eminently references Roman his- tory – the republican Numa,Camillus,Apius, Hannibal, Pompey;and the impe- rial Augustus, Nero, Vespasian,Titus,Domitian, Trajan, Zenobia, Diocletian and Constantine are all mentioned, onlytoname afew.Moreover,all of them are an- ecdotallyused as areference point,positive or negative,for the contemporary material he is dealingwith.⁶ The strength of tradition: classicalbiographical patterns With such an education, one should not be surprised that Procopius created, in the Secret History,aportrait of Theodorawhich is so different from her previous imagefound in the Wars. Although discussions about the historicityofboth im- ages have been redebated throughout the decades, it seems that nowadaysa consensus has been reached regardingthe historicalparticipation of Theodora in political and ecclesiastical affairs, thanks mainlytothe use of other sources, even epigraphical evidence. Theodora, as wasexpected from women in the im- perial court,appeared sidebysidewith her husband in court rituals and fi- nanced hospitals for indigents,convents and churches – she had financial means at her disposal to act rather independently.⁷ Likewise, attestations of Rubin, Prokopios (as footnote above), –.Particularlyfor the styleofthe Anékdota,see A. Kaldellis,Introduction, in idem, Prokopios.The Secret Historywith related texts.Indianap- olis/Cambridge ,xxxv-xl. Rubin, Prokopios (as footnote above), . About the uses of ancient historiographybysixth-century historians,see G. Greatrex,Pro- copius and the past in sixth-century Constantinople. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire (), –. C. Pazdernik, “Our most pious consort givenusbyGod”:dissidentreactions to the partner- ship of Justinian and Theodora,A.D. –.Classical Antiquity (), –;C. Foss,The empress Theodora. Byzantion (), –;J.A.Evans,The empress Theo- dora: partner of Justinian. Austin ,passim; and J. A. Evans,The power game in Byzantium: Antonina and the empress Theodora. London ,passim. 772 Byzantinische Zeitschrift Bd. 113/3, 2020: I. Abteilung her favour towards the Monophysites, and the ransom for poor youngwomen sold by their parents to brothels and procurers seem trustworthy.⁸ Her likelycon- nection to prostitution prior to her putting on the imperial purple, none the less, has more rhetoricaland literary relevance than historical, as we shall see further on.⁹ Her portrait in the so-called Secret History,onthe other hand,has been rightlyinterpreted as aquitetraditionalmovetobesmirch her husband’srepu- tation through the critique of the character and the habits of his wife.¹⁰ Itsan- cient parallels are countless,but the most striking ones, duetotheir obvious connection to Theodora, are Messalina(Plin. HN 10.172; Juv. 6; Tac. Ann. 11.25– 38), Agrippina (Tac. Ann. 12.3–7),¹¹ and, particularly, Aspasia. The latter was vis- ited even by Socrates,and wascalled awhorebythe comic play-wrights for her sincereand explicit romancewith Pericles – it is transmitted that they tenderly kissed each other every time he came homeorwentout (Plut. Per. 24.8 – 9). More- over her cultured disposition, extraordinary in awoman of her time, probably led the general public to think that she could not be one of the conventional wivesthat abide at their gynaeceum.¹² Similarly,Procopius underlines that Jus- tinian married her out of sheer passion, and it is preciselythis irrational passion that causes the ruin of the Empire (SH 9.30 –32). Further to this, the speech by Theodoraduring the Nikarevolt (Wars 3.24.37) is most likelyaplayofintertex- tuality with Plato’smocking parodyinthe Menexenus – and with other Socratics, such as Aeschines, author of an Aspasia that we have onlyfragmentarilypre-
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D

    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D

    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
  • Reevaluating the Nika Riot & Placing It in Conversation with the Antioch

    Reevaluating the Nika Riot & Placing It in Conversation with the Antioch

    Xavier University Exhibit Honors Bachelor of Arts Undergraduate 2019-4 Reevaluating the Nika Riot & Placing it in Conversation with the Antioch Riot of 387 Ty Richer Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH Follow this and additional works at: https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Classical Archaeology and Art History Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, and the Other Classics Commons Recommended Citation Richer, Ty, "Reevaluating the Nika Riot & Placing it in Conversation with the Antioch Riot of 387" (2019). Honors Bachelor of Arts. 39. https://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/hab/39 This Capstone/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Bachelor of Arts by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reevaluating the Nika Riot & Placing it in Conversation with the Antioch Riot of 387 By: Ty Richer CPHAB Senior Thesis Xavier University 2019 1 Introduction: A Fine Mess on a Sunny Day You enter into the stadium and find a place to sit down, doing chores around the house made you late, but multiple races run each day, so much of the fun is still ahead. Behind you sits a man, having brought his son to see the games. In front of you is a young man and woman talking about their interests, on their first date no doubt. You strike up a conversation with the man sitting to your left and begin to talk about the new taxes you both have to pay.
  • The Geographers of the Early Byzantine Period

    The Geographers of the Early Byzantine Period

    European Journal of Science and Theology, December 2012, Vol.8, No.4, 23-40 _______________________________________________________________________ THE GEOGRAPHERS OF THE EARLY BYZANTINE PERIOD Vassilios Manimanis 1, Efstratios Theodosiou1 and Milan S. Dimitrijevic2* 1 National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Physics, Department of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, Panepistimiopolis, Zografos 15784, Athens, Greece 2 Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11160 Belgrade, Serbia (Received 8 January 2012) Abstract In Byzantine empire the knowledge of Geography was considered necessary for locating the Holy Land and for setting the boundaries of the dioceses. Essentially, Geography was studied by monks in the monasteries; the perception of the Earth by Byzantine geographers – especially by the monk Cosmas Indicopleustes – was to a large extent imaginary and influenced by the Scriptures and religious ideas. Here are considered geographers of the early Byzantine period: Éthicus Istriote, Marcian of Heracleia, Caesarius, Palladius of Helenopolis, Agathodaemon, Christodorus, Hierocles the Grammarian, Procopius of Caesarea, Corippus the African, Stephen of Byzantium, Nonnosus, Priscianus the Grammaticus, Marcellinus the Illyrian and John of Gaza. Keywords: Byzantium, Geography, Byzantines geographers, Natural Sciences 1. Introduction During the early Byzantine period the knowledge of Geography was considered necessary for locating the Holy Land and for setting the boundaries of the dioceses. Thus, starting with the work of
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation

    Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation

    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
  • This Is a History of the Ostrogoths, Theodoric and the Arian Heresy

    This Is a History of the Ostrogoths, Theodoric and the Arian Heresy

    This is a history of the Ostrogoths, Theodoric and the Arian heresy Ostrogoths The Ostrogoths were one of the two chief tribes of the Goths, a Germanic people. Their traditions relate that the Goths originally lived on both sides of the Baltic Sea, in Scandinavia and on the Continent. Their oldest habitations recorded in history were situated on the right bank of the Vistula. They left these, all or in part, about the middle of the second century, and settled near the Black Sea, between the Don and Danube. Thence they emerged frequently to attack and pillage the cities of Greece and Asia Minor, and fought continuously with the Romans and the neighbouring Germanic tribes. The emperor Decius fell in battle with them in 251. Crossing the Danube into Thracia in 269 they were defeated by Claudius. Aurelian drove them back across the Danube and gave them Dacia. After that, the Ostrogoths were east of the River Dniester, and the Visigoths to the west. During the reign of Constantine they again attempted to cross the Danube but were repulsed. During the years 350-75 the Goths were united under the leadership of Ermanaric, the Ostrogoth. In 375 they were conquered by the Huns. Some escaped into the Crimea, where they retained their language up to the sixteenth century; the mass of the people, however, remained in their own lands and paid tribute to the Huns; but were otherwise fairly independent and elected their own kings. When the empire of the Huns collapsed after the death of Attila (453), the Ostrogoths regained independence.
  • Theodora by Ophelia Stride 9Y

    Theodora by Ophelia Stride 9Y

    Theodora (497-548) was a Byzantine empress, wife of the emperor Justinian I and the most powerful woman in Byzantine history. BY OPHELIA STRIDE 9Y OPHELIA BY THEODORA WHO WERE THEY AND WHY WERE THEY FAMOUS AND HER EARLY LIFE? Theodora, (born c. 497 CE—died June 28, 548, Constantinople was the Byzantine impress, wife of the emperor Justinian I (reigned 527–565) and was probably the most powerful woman in Byzantine history. Her intelligence and political presence made her Justinian’s most trusted adviser and enabled her to use the power and influence of her office to promote religious and social policies that favoured her interests. Little is known of Theodora’s early life, but her father, Acacius, was a bear keeper at the Hippodrome (circus) in Constantinople and my sources says that she became an actress and prostitute while still young, therefore leading an unconventional life that included giving birth to at least one child out of wedlock. For a time, she made her living as a wool spinner. When Justinian met her, she had been converted to miaphysitism, a nonorthodox doctrine. Attracted by her beauty and intelligence, he made her his mistress and married her in 525. Her unfortunate background meant that prior to the marriage, special legislation had to be passed legalizing unions between actresses and men of senatorial rank or higher. When Justinian succeeded to the throne in 527, she was proclaimed augusta. her superior intelligence and deft handling of political affairs caused many to think that it was she, rather than Justinian, who ruled Byzantium.
  • 25011016 Justinian

    25011016 Justinian

    "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 Author(s): Charles Pazdernik Source: Classical Antiquity, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Oct., 1994), pp. 256-281 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016 Accessed: 12-01-2017 22:58 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25011016?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Classical Antiquity This content downloaded from 128.228.173.41 on Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:58:39 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms CHARLES PAZDERNIK "Our Most Pious Consort Given Us by God": Dissident Reactions to the Partnership of Justinian and Theodora, A.D. 525-548 T E VIVIDNESS with which the reign of Justinian I and his empress Theodora holds our imagination emerges no less from the coloring given the period in the writings of contemporary figures than from the events themselves, however momentous they were.
  • The Ruin of the Roman Empire

    The Ruin of the Roman Empire

    7888888888889 u o u o u o u THE o u Ruin o u OF THE o u Roman o u o u EMPIRE o u o u o u o u jamesj . o’donnell o u o u o u o u o u o u o hjjjjjjjjjjjk This is Ann’s book contents Preface iv Overture 1 part i s theoderic’s world 1. Rome in 500: Looking Backward 47 2. The World That Might Have Been 107 part ii s justinian’s world 3. Being Justinian 177 4. Opportunities Lost 229 5. Wars Worse Than Civil 247 part iii s gregory’s world 6. Learning to Live Again 303 7. Constantinople Deflated: The Debris of Empire 342 8. The Last Consul 364 Epilogue 385 List of Roman Emperors 395 Notes 397 Further Reading 409 Credits and Permissions 411 Index 413 About the Author Other Books by James J. O’ Donnell Credits Cover Copyright About the Publisher preface An American soldier posted in Anbar province during the twilight war over the remains of Saddam’s Mesopotamian kingdom might have been surprised to learn he was defending the westernmost frontiers of the an- cient Persian empire against raiders, smugglers, and worse coming from the eastern reaches of the ancient Roman empire. This painful recycling of history should make him—and us—want to know what unhealable wound, what recurrent pathology, what cause too deep for journalists and politicians to discern draws men and women to their deaths again and again in such a place. The history of Rome, as has often been true in the past, has much to teach us.
  • SOBORNOST St

    SOBORNOST St

    SOBORNOST St. Thomas the Apostle Orthodox Church (301) 638-5035 Church 4419 Leonardtown Road Waldorf, MD 20601 Rev. Father Joseph Edgington, Pastor (703) 532-8017 [email protected] www.apostlethomas.org American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese ECUMENICAL PATRIARCHATE OF CONSTANTINOPLE Wednesday: Moleben to the Theotokos 6:00 AM Friday: Moleben to the Cross 6:00 AM Saturday: Confession 4:30 PM Great Vespers 5:00 PM Sunday: Matins (Orthros) 8:45 AM | Divine Liturgy 10:00 AM July 11, 2021 – 3rd Sunday After Pentecost Great-Martyr Euphemia the All-praised The Miracle of Saint Euphemia the All-Praised: The holy Great Martyr Euphemia (September 16) suffered martyrdom in the city of Chalcedon in the year 304, during the time of the persecution against Christians by the emperor Diocletian (284-305). One and a half centuries later, at a time when the Christian Church had become victorious within the Roman Empire, God deigned that Euphemia the All- Praised should again be a witness and confessor of the purity of the Orthodox teaching. In the year 451 in the city of Chalcedon, in the very church where the glorified relics of the holy Great Martyr Euphemia rested, the sessions of the Fourth Ecumenical Council (July 16) took place. The Council was convened for determining the precise dogmatic formulae of the Orthodox Church concerning the nature of the God-Man Jesus Christ. This was necessary because of the widespread heresy of the Monophysites [“mono-physis” meaning “one nature”], who opposed the Orthodox teaching of the two natures in Jesus Christ, the Divine and the Human natures (in one Divine Person).
  • Roman Coins Elementary Manual

    Roman Coins Elementary Manual

    ^1 If5*« ^IP _\i * K -- ' t| Wk '^ ^. 1 Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google Digitized by Google PROTAT BROTHERS, PRINTBRS, MACON (PRANCi) Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL COMPILED BY CAV. FRANCESCO gNECCHI VICE-PRBSIDENT OF THE ITALIAN NUMISMATIC SOaETT, HONORARY MEMBER OF THE LONDON, BELGIAN AND SWISS NUMISMATIC SOCIBTIES. 2"^ EDITION RKVISRD, CORRECTED AND AMPLIFIED Translated by the Rev<> Alfred Watson HANDS MEMBF,R OP THE LONDON NUMISMATIC SOCIETT LONDON SPINK & SON 17 & l8 PICCADILLY W. — I & 2 GRACECHURCH ST. B.C. 1903 (ALL RIGHTS RF^ERVED) Digitized by Google Arc //-/7^. K.^ Digitized by Google ROMAN COINS ELEMENTARY MANUAL AUTHOR S PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION In the month of July 1898 the Rev. A. W. Hands, with whom I had become acquainted through our common interests and stud- ieSy wrote to me asking whether it would be agreeable to me and reasonable to translate and publish in English my little manual of the Roman Coinage, and most kindly offering to assist me, if my knowledge of the English language was not sufficient. Feeling honoured by the request, and happy indeed to give any assistance I could in rendering this science popular in other coun- tries as well as my own, I suggested that it would he probably less trouble ii he would undertake the translation himselt; and it was with much pleasure and thankfulness that I found this proposal was accepted. It happened that the first edition of my Manual was then nearly exhausted, and by waiting a short time I should be able to offer to the English reader the translation of the second edition, which was being rapidly prepared with additions and improvements.
  • Heather Juliussen-Stevenson, M.A., 2008

    Heather Juliussen-Stevenson, M.A., 2008

    ABSTRACT Title of Document: PERFORMING CHRISTIAN FEMALE IDENTITY IN ROMAN ALEXANDRIA. Heather Juliussen-Stevenson, M.A., 2008 Directed By: Professor Kenneth Holum, Ph.D., History Department The Christian women of Roman Alexandria are something of a mystery, but they were integral to the transformation of religion. They Christianized the space they occupied, their bodies becoming houses for sanctity. While it is difficult to verify the accuracy of male representations of female subjects, discourse exposes the underlying assumptions upon which gender was understood. Reformed prostitutes, women who traveled to the shrine at Menouthis, collectors of pilgrim flasks from Abu Menas who sat in front of the Virgin Mary fresco at Kom el-Dikka, and virgins who shut themselves away—none of these women may have thought of themselves as men suggested. Yet when men referenced the feminine, they introduced alterity, indicating resistance to a master discourse or even competition among rival discourses. This negotiation, combined with a daily expression of agency through the use of space, reveals how women must have asserted their rights to salvation. PERFORMING CHRISTIAN FEMALE IDENTITY IN ROMAN ALEXANDRIA. By Heather Juliussen-Stevenson. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts 2008 Advisory Committee: Professor Kenneth Holum, Ph.D., Chair Professor Arthur Eckstein, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Janna Wasilewski, Ph.D. © Copyright by Heather Juliussen-Stevenson 2008 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful for the advice and support of Drs. Holum, Eckstein and Wasilewski. In addition, I would like to thank my brother, my favorite sibling.
  • Textual Representation and Visual Display Of

    Textual Representation and Visual Display Of

    Female power and its propaganda: textual representation and visual display of imperial women in Late Antiquity and Byzantium (II) 16:00 - 18:30 Friday, 23rd August, 2019 Room 8 Presentation type Workshop 163 The image of empress Lupicina/Euphemia in the patristic sources Margarita Vallejo Girvés University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Spain Abstract Among the important governments of emperors Anastasius and Justinian, and those of their respective wives, that of Justin I has gone unnoticed. Until the study of B. Croke in 2007 the period between 518 and 527 has been treated as a previous step of the mandate of Justinian I, being therefore Justin I a mere puppet in the hands of his nephew. Nonetheless, there is currently a broad debate about the figure of Justin I and his real political activity. On top of this, it should not be surprising that the interest for Euphemia, wife of Justin I, has been practically reduced to a simple opposition to the marriage of Justinian and Theodora. However, the ecclesiastical sources present her with a great capacity to influence her husband in such matters as the end of the Acacian schism, which was the great religious initiative of Justin I´s reign. This is the case of Pope Hormisdas, on behalf of the supporters of the ecclesiastical union between Rome and Constantinople, who requests the intervention of Euphemia to persuade the emperor to restore three Chalcedonian bishops deposed by Anastasius I. This is also the case of John of Ephesus who, as attested in fragments preserved through Pseudo-Dionysius of Tel-Mahre and Michael the Syrian, is presented not only as an active militant of the Chalcedonian, but also as the only member of the court of Justin I whose pressure on John of Constantinople achieved that he accepted, in the end, the union with Rome.