Current Epidemiology and Management of Radiocontrast-Associated Acute- and Delayed-Onset Hypersensitivity: a Review of the Liter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Current Epidemiology and Management of Radiocontrast-Associated Acute- and Delayed-Onset Hypersensitivity: a Review of the Liter REVIEW ARTICLE Current Epidemiology and Management of Radiocontrast-Associated Acute- and Delayed-Onset Hypersensitivity: A Review of the Literature Eric M Macy, MD, MS Perm J 2018;22:17-072 E-pub: 12/29/2017 https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/17-072 ABSTRACT China. They prospectively collected data Radiocontrast-associated acute-onset hypersensitivity reactions now occur less frequently on all cases. They identified 506 (0.4%) than before 1990, when high-osmolar, ionic, radiocontrast agents were widely used. Premedi- hypersensitivity reactions, of which 90.0% cation with corticosteroids and antihistamines does not reliably prevent recurrent low-osmolar were mild, 7.7% were moderate, and 1.4% radiocontrast-associated acute hypersensitivity reactions. Corticosteroid prophylaxis for acute were considered severe. Hypersensitivity hypersensitivity currently causes more morbidity than benefit. The specific radiocontrast agent reactions were more common with iso- that is associated with a patient’s adverse reaction must be displayed in the drug intolerance osmolar agents than with hypo-osmolar or drug “allergy” field of their electronic health record to enable effective management and radiocontrast media. Risk factors for acute prevention of future reactions. The term iodine allergy should never be used in the context of reactions included previous acute reac- radiocontrast-associated adverse reactions because it leads to poorer clinical outcomes. The tions, asthma, doses higher than 100 mL, time to onset of the reaction and the nature of the reaction must be noted in enough detail in and injection rates higher than 5 mL/s. the drug intolerance comment fields in the electronic health record to determine the potential The authors were unable to reliably col- mechanism for the reaction and to enable selection of the appropriate radiocontrast material lect delayed-onset reaction data because for future exposures. Most individuals with a history of radiocontrast agent hypersensitivity many patients were in the facility only for can be effectively managed by selecting an alternative radiocontrast agent, without any the procedure. premedication. Radiology Departments, catheterization laboratories, and all physicians who We reported in 2012 that of 2,375,424 use parenteral radiocontrast media must have management plans in place to treat severe Kaiser Permanente Southern California acute reactions when they occur. Patients should be informed that delayed-onset reactions, (KPSC) Health Plan members who had a mostly benign rashes within one week of exposure, are as common or more common than health care visit and at least 11 months of acute reactions. Future radiocontrast-associated acute and delayed-onset reactions can be health care coverage during 2009, a total minimized, but never completely avoided, by using an appropriate alternative agent. of 0.5% of females and 0.3% of males had a radiocontrast agent “allergy.”7 During INTRODUCTION benign delayed-onset, and severe delayed- 2009 a new radiocontrast “allergy” was The epidemiology and optimal manage- onset. Acute onset, which occurs less than reported in 0.1% of females who had at ment of radiocontrast-associated adverse one hour after exposure, is typically caused least 1 other drug “allergy,” in 0.1% of reactions have changed dramatically since by mast cell activation, either directly or, males who had at least 1 other drug “al- 1985, with the almost exclusive current use rarely, is immunoglobulin E (IgE) medi- lergy,” 0.04% of females who had no other of low-osmolality nonionic radiocontrast ated.3 Delayed onset is defined as starting drug “allergy,” and in 0.02% of males who agents and very low rates of use of high- more than one hour but typically starting had no other drug “allergy.” Individuals osmolality ionic radiocontrast agents.1 more than three hours and up to two to with any drug “allergies” were more likely This review will concentrate on reports five days after exposure; these reactions to use more health care services and thus published since 2010. The goal of this re- are thought to be T-cell-mediated, de- might be more likely to be exposed to view is to add clarity and specificity to the layed-type hypersensitivity.4 These reac- radiocontrast media. Between January general suggestions given in the American tions rarely rise to the level of a serious 1, 2014, and April 30, 2017, there were College of Radiology’s ACR Manual on cutaneous adverse reaction, such as toxic 372 serious, acute-onset, radiocontrast- Contrast Media, Version 10.3, last updated epidermal necrolysis or Stevens-Johnson associated reactions reported by KPSC on May 31, 2017.2 syndrome.5 Radiology Departments, 335 (90.1%) as- sociated with iohexol, 19 (5.1%) associated REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE Epidemiology with iodixanol, 1 (0.3%) associated with Radiocontrast Agent Hypersensitivity Li and coworkers6 in 2016 reported on diatrizoate, and 17 (4.6%) with the associ- Mechanisms 120,822 individuals receiving iopromide, ated radiocontrast agent not reported. It is There are four general categories of iodixanol, iopamidol, ioversol, iobitridol, or currently not possible to accurately iden- radiocontrast-associated hypersensitivity iohexol between January 2014 and March tify all exposures to radiocontrast agents reactions: benign acute-onset, anaphylaxis, 2016 at a single institution in Chongqing, throughout the entire KPSC health care Eric Macy, MD, MS, is an Allergy Specialist and Researcher in the Department of Allergy at the San Diego Medical Center in CA. He is a Partner Physician with the Southern California Permanente Medical Group, and an Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine at the University of California, San Diego. E-mail: [email protected]. The Permanente Journal/Perm J 2018;22:17-072 1 REVIEW ARTICLE Current Epidemiology and Management of Radiocontrast-Associated Acute- and Delayed-Onset Hypersensitivity: A Review of the Literature system or to capture all new acute and Table 1. Radiocontrast agent use in Kaiser Permanente Southern California, delayed-onset reactions because of the 2014 through 2016 poor quality of the adverse drug reaction Agent 2014 2015 2016 Total reporting in the electronic health record Iohexola (mL) 19,088,565 20,385,128 22,064,825 61,538,518 (EHR). Even when reported, the specific Iodixanolb (mL) 1,650,500 1,361,000 1,352,500 4,364,000 radiocontrast agent implicated is virtu- Total (mL) 20,739,065 21,746,128 23,417,325 65,902,518 ally never noted in the EHR, nor are the Approximate exposures 414,782 434,922 468,346 1,318,050 symptoms described in enough detail to at 50 mL per exposure confidently determine a mechanism. It a Typically used at 10 mL to 100 mL per exposure. was, however, possible to identify how b Typically used at 10 mL to 250 mL per exposure. much radiocontrast medium was pur- chased each year for KPSC and then estimate annual exposures. The amount cases had any previous exposure to radio- subsequent radiocontrast exposures, with of iohexol and iodixanol used annually in contrast agents. The authors concluded a median of 2 exposures and a range of 1 KPSC in 2014 through 2016 is displayed that “risk” factors for fatal anaphylaxis to 11. There were 19 individuals (38.0%) in Table 1. In KPSC we annually used included any history of asthma, allergic who had at least 1 additional episode of about 11.5 to 16 times as much iohexol rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, multiple al- radiocontrast-associated hives, for a total as iodixanol. We had approximately 1 lergies, drug allergy, food allergy, previ- of 26 events (19.5%) in the 133 imaging reported severe acute reaction for ev- ous radiocontrast exposure, β-blocker or studies. Paradoxically, individuals who ery 183,697 mL (about 3674 exposures nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, were premedicated were more likely to [range, 1837-18,370]) of iohexol and 1 and any preexisting condition including have hives with subsequent exposures. reported severe acute reaction for ev- any cardiovascular, renal, hematologic, The was no premedication given before 89 ery 229,684 mL (about 4594 exposures autoimmune, or metabolic disease. This (66.9%) of the scans. Those premedicated [range 1199-22,968]) of iodixanol. list is of questionable utility, with almost with diphenhydramine had an adjusted Scheinfeld and colleagues8 at Albert as many “risk” factors as reported cases. odds ratio of 1.2 (95% confidence interval Einstein College of Medicine in New There have been only rare reported = 0.2-7.3, p = 0.85). Those premedicated York, NY, reported in 2014 that of cases of radiocontrast-associated serious with corticosteroids had an adjusted odds 927,000 total “allergies” documented dur- cutaneous adverse reactions, specifically ratio of 14.3 (95% confidence interval = ing a 10-year period in their EHR, virtu- Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epi- 4.1-50.4, p < 0.0001). Those premedi- ally none of the more than 7000 patients dermal necrolysis.5 There has been one cated with corticosteroids and diphen- with “allergies” reported to “contrasts” case of recurrent iopromide-associated hydramine had an adjusted odds ratio of or “iodine” had a specific radiocontrast Stevens-Johnson syndrome reported, 8.3 (95% confidence interval = 1.8-37.9, agent listed. with three distinct episodes.11 p = 0.006). The authors concluded that Dean et al9 reported in 2015 that premedication may not be necessary, but adverse reactions after radiocontrast- Prevention of Recurrent radiology personnel need to be aware of enhanced computed tomography (CT) Radiocontrast-Associated Reactions prior reaction history and be knowledge- scans were reported at a lower overall rate Kolbe and coworkers12 at the Mayo able in recognition and treatment of these in inpatients compared with outpatients, Clinic in Rochester, MN, reported in reactions. but the reactions reported were more se- 2014 data from 245 individuals with Mervak and coworkers13 in 2015 re- vere. Less than 10% of the reported reac- reactions (0.08%, or 1 in 1222), of ported on 626 inpatients with a history tions were delayed onset.
Recommended publications
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) Ewsletter Bradu and Rossini
    Pharmacologyonline 2: 727-753 (2010) ewsletter Bradu and Rossini COTRAST AGETS - IODIATED PRODUCTS. SECOD WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS 2010 COTRIBUTIO O AGGREGATE WHO SYSTEM-ORGA CLASS DISORDERS AD/OR CLUSTERIG BASED O REPORTED ADVERSE REACTIOS/EVETS Dan Bradu and Luigi Rossini* Servizio Nazionale Collaborativo WHO-ITA / ITA-OMS, Università Politecnica delle Marche e Progetto di Farmacotossicovigilanza, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Regione Marche, Italia Summary From the 2010 total basic adverse reactions and events collected as ADRs preferred names in the WHO-Uppsala Drug Monitoring Programme, subdivided in its first two twenty years periods as for the first seven iodinated products diagnostic contrast agents amidotrizoate, iodamide, iotalamate, iodoxamate, ioxaglate, iohexsol and iopamidol, their 30 WHO-system organ class disorders (SOCDs) aggregates had been compared. Their common maximum 97% levels identified six SOCDs only, apt to evaluate the most frequent single ADRs for each class, and their percentual normalization profiles for each product. The WILKS's chi square statistics for the related contingency tables, and Gabriel’s STP procedure applied to the extracted double data sets then produced profile binary clustering, as well as Euclidean confirmatory plots. They finally showed similar objectively evaluated autoclassificative trends of these products, which do not completely correspond to their actual ATC V08A A, B and C subdivision: while amidotrizoate and iotalamate, and respectively iohesol and iopamidol are confirmed to belong to the A and B subgroups, ioxaglate behaves fluctuating within A, B and C, but iodamide looks surprizingly, constantly positioned together with iodoxamate as binary/ternary C associated. In view of the recent work of Campillos et al (Science, 2008) which throws light on the subject, the above discrepancies do not appear anymore unexpected or alarming.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS May Be Disposed of Via Sanitary Sewer Or Solid Waste
    NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS May Be Disposed Of Via Sanitary Sewer or Solid Waste (+)-A-TOCOPHEROL ACID SUCCINATE (+,-)-VERAPAMIL, HYDROCHLORIDE 1-AMINOANTHRAQUINONE 1-AMINO-1-CYCLOHEXANECARBOXYLIC ACID 1-BROMOOCTADECANE 1-CARBOXYNAPHTHALENE 1-DECENE 1-HYDROXYANTHRAQUINONE 1-METHYL-4-PHENYL-1,2,5,6-TETRAHYDROPYRIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE 1-NONENE 1-TETRADECENE 1-THIO-B-D-GLUCOSE 1-TRIDECENE 1-UNDECENE 2-ACETAMIDO-1-AZIDO-1,2-DIDEOXY-B-D-GLYCOPYRANOSE 2-ACETAMIDOACRYLIC ACID 2-AMINO-4-CHLOROBENZOTHIAZOLE 2-AMINO-2-(HYDROXY METHYL)-1,3-PROPONEDIOL 2-AMINOBENZOTHIAZOLE 2-AMINOIMIDAZOLE 2-AMINO-5-METHYLBENZENESULFONIC ACID 2-AMINOPURINE 2-ANILINOETHANOL 2-BUTENE-1,4-DIOL 2-CHLOROBENZYLALCOHOL 2-DEOXYCYTIDINE 5-MONOPHOSPHATE 2-DEOXY-D-GLUCOSE 2-DEOXY-D-RIBOSE 2'-DEOXYURIDINE 2'-DEOXYURIDINE 5'-MONOPHOSPHATE 2-HYDROETHYL ACETATE 2-HYDROXY-4-(METHYLTHIO)BUTYRIC ACID 2-METHYLFLUORENE 2-METHYL-2-THIOPSEUDOUREA SULFATE 2-MORPHOLINOETHANESULFONIC ACID 2-NAPHTHOIC ACID 2-OXYGLUTARIC ACID 2-PHENYLPROPIONIC ACID 2-PYRIDINEALDOXIME METHIODIDE 2-STEP CHEMISTRY STEP 1 PART D 2-STEP CHEMISTRY STEP 2 PART A 2-THIOLHISTIDINE 2-THIOPHENECARBOXYLIC ACID 2-THIOPHENECARBOXYLIC HYDRAZIDE 3-ACETYLINDOLE 3-AMINO-1,2,4-TRIAZINE 3-AMINO-L-TYROSINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE MONOHYDRATE 3-CARBETHOXY-2-PIPERIDONE 3-CHLOROCYCLOBUTANONE SOLUTION 3-CHLORO-2-NITROBENZOIC ACID 3-(DIETHYLAMINO)-7-[[P-(DIMETHYLAMINO)PHENYL]AZO]-5-PHENAZINIUM CHLORIDE 3-HYDROXYTROSINE 1 9/26/2005 NON-HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS May Be Disposed Of Via Sanitary Sewer or Solid Waste 3-HYDROXYTYRAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE 3-METHYL-1-PHENYL-2-PYRAZOLIN-5-ONE
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 Note: Within Nine Months from the Publication of the Mention
    Europäisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office & Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 411 992 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 49/04 (2006.01) A61K 49/18 (2006.01) 13.12.2006 Bulletin 2006/50 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 02758379.8 PCT/EP2002/008183 (22) Date of filing: 23.07.2002 (87) International publication number: WO 2003/013616 (20.02.2003 Gazette 2003/08) (54) IONIC AND NON-IONIC RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST AGENTS FOR USE IN COMBINED X-RAY AND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE DIAGNOSTICS IONISCHES UND NICHT-IONISCHES RADIOGRAPHISCHES KONTRASTMITTEL ZUR VERWENDUNG IN DER KOMBINIERTEN ROENTGEN- UND KERNSPINTOMOGRAPHIEDIAGNOSTIK SUBSTANCES IONIQUES ET NON-IONIQUES DE CONTRASTE RADIOGRAPHIQUE UTILISEES POUR ETABLIR DES DIAGNOSTICS FAISANT APPEL AUX RAYONS X ET A L’IMAGERIE PAR RESONANCE MAGNETIQUE (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Minoja, Fabrizio AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR Bianchetti Bracco Minoja S.r.l. IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Via Plinio, 63 20129 Milano (IT) (30) Priority: 03.08.2001 IT MI20011706 (56) References cited: (43) Date of publication of application: EP-A- 0 759 785 WO-A-00/75141 28.04.2004 Bulletin 2004/18 US-A- 5 648 536 (73) Proprietor: BRACCO IMAGING S.p.A. • K HERGAN, W. DORINGER, M. LÄNGLE W.OSER: 20134 Milano (IT) "Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging" EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF (72) Inventors: RADIOLOGY, vol. 21, 1995, pages 11-17, • AIME, Silvio XP002227102 20134 Milano (IT) • K.M.
    [Show full text]
  • ACR Manual on Contrast Media
    ACR Manual On Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media Preface 2 ACR Manual on Contrast Media 2021 ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media © Copyright 2021 American College of Radiology ISBN: 978-1-55903-012-0 TABLE OF CONTENTS Topic Page 1. Preface 1 2. Version History 2 3. Introduction 4 4. Patient Selection and Preparation Strategies Before Contrast 5 Medium Administration 5. Fasting Prior to Intravascular Contrast Media Administration 14 6. Safe Injection of Contrast Media 15 7. Extravasation of Contrast Media 18 8. Allergic-Like And Physiologic Reactions to Intravascular 22 Iodinated Contrast Media 9. Contrast Media Warming 29 10. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury and Contrast 33 Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Adults 11. Metformin 45 12. Contrast Media in Children 48 13. Gastrointestinal (GI) Contrast Media in Adults: Indications and 57 Guidelines 14. ACR–ASNR Position Statement On the Use of Gadolinium 78 Contrast Agents 15. Adverse Reactions To Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media 79 16. Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) 83 17. Ultrasound Contrast Media 92 18. Treatment of Contrast Reactions 95 19. Administration of Contrast Media to Pregnant or Potentially 97 Pregnant Patients 20. Administration of Contrast Media to Women Who are Breast- 101 Feeding Table 1 – Categories Of Acute Reactions 103 Table 2 – Treatment Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 105 Children Table 3 – Management Of Acute Reactions To Contrast Media In 114 Adults Table 4 – Equipment For Contrast Reaction Kits In Radiology 122 Appendix A – Contrast Media Specifications 124 PREFACE This edition of the ACR Manual on Contrast Media replaces all earlier editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Ionis Pharmaceuticals June 7, 2016
    Update on Ionis Pharmaceuticals June 7, 2016 Due to recent announcements and ongoing price weakness in the stock of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, we wanted to provide you an update on our thinking relating to your investment in the company. Background: Buena Vista Investment Management began investing in Ionis Pharmaceuticals (previously known as Isis Pharmaceuticals) in 2004 based on our belief that their genetic research and unique approach to discovering new drugs through the use of Antisense Technology would eventually lead to a much higher stock price. Since that first investment 12 years ago we have seen many ups and downs in the stock price but through it all the company’s technology continues to improve and its balance sheet has never been better. As investors, we entered 2016 with the potential for a lot of good news. First, the company had three phase 3 trials coming to endpoints within 18 months. Second, the company’s new subsidiary, Akcea Therapeutics, which was created to focus on their lipid franchise, was now up and running. The company had an exceptionally strong balance sheet for a biotechnology company, with approximately $700 million in cash and marketable securities. And most importantly, the company now had 38 compounds in clinical trials, an unheard of number for a company of this size. Yet with all of these potential positive catalysts for the stock, we are now sitting at the same price level as we were in the beginning of 2014. The price of Ionis stock has dropped from a high of $77 per share in April of 2015 to the mid 20’s today.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Pharmacopoeia
    The International Pharmacopoeia THIRD EDITION Pharmacopoea internationalis Editio tertia Volume 4 Tests, methods, and general requirements Quality specifications for pharmaceutical substances, excipients, and dosage forms World Health Organization Geneva 1994 WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data The International Pharmacopoeia.- 3rd ed. Contents: v. 4. Tests, methods, and general requirements 1. Drugs -analysis 2. Drugs -standards ISBN 92 4 154462 7 (NLM Classification: QV 25) The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publica- tions, in part or in full. Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Of£ice of Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations already available. O World Health Organization, 1994 Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright protection in accordance with the provi- sions of Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distin- guished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Diatrizoate Sodium)
    PRESCRIBING INFORMATION HYPAQUE ORAL POWDER (Diatrizoate Sodium) Contrast Medium GE Healthcare Canada Inc. Date of Preparation: 2300 Meadowvale Blvd. March 20, 2006 Mississauga, ON L5N 5P9 Control # 104484 HYPAQUE ORAL (Diatrizoate Sodium) CONTRAST MEDIUM INDICATIONS: Radiography of gastrointestinal tract following oral or rectal administration. PRECAUTIONS: Not for parenteral injection. Do not use for myelography. It is advisable to correct any electrolyte disturbances before using solutions that are extremely hypertonic. Caution is advised in patients with severe renal or hepatic disease, known hypersensitivity to diatrizoic acid compounds or hyperthyroidism. Pregnancy: The safety of orally administered diatrizoate sodium solutions during pregnancy has not been established. Therefore, before administration of the drug to women of childbearing potential, the benefit to the patient should be carefully weighed against the possible risk to the fetus. In addition, most authorities consider elective contrast radiography of the abdomen contraindicated during pregnancy. Lactation: Diatrizoate sodium administered intravascularly has been found to be excreted in breast milk. Because small amounts may be absorbed from oral administration, caution should be exercised when diatrizoate sodium solutions are administered to a nursing woman. Children: Solutions of diatrizoate sodium employed clinically are hypertonic, which may lead to intraluminal movement of fluid and may lead to hypovolemia. In infants and young children (under 10 kg), the loss of plasma fluid may be sufficient to cause a shock-like state; therefore, low concentrations (achieved by further dilution) must be used. Diatrizoate sodium may be preferred over the diatrizoate meglumine/diatrizoate sodium combination, since the wetting agent (Tween 80) in the latter preparation may be injurious to the colonic mucosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Fifty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc., Held in Atlantic City, N.J., May 2, 1966: Abstracts
    Proceedings of the Fifty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Society for Clinical Investigation, Inc., Held in Atlantic City, N.J., May 2, 1966: Abstracts J Clin Invest. 1966;45(6):980-1037. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI105414. Research Article Find the latest version: https://jci.me/105414/pdf ABSTRACTS Comparison of Effects of Alpha Adrenergic Blockade luminescence. Inhibition of ATPase activities by ouabain, on Resistance and Capacitance Vessels. FRANCOIS parachloromercuribenzoate (PCMB), and parachloro- M. ABBOUD * AND JOHN W. ECKSTEIN,* Iowa City, mercuribenzenesulfonate (PCMBS) was studied. ¶1 Mem- Iowa. brane ATPase of osmotically prepared platelet "ghosts" A foreleg of each of 20 dogs was perfused with blood is composed of Na+-K+-Mg++-dependent ATPase (15 to at a constant rate through the brachial artery. The 30%) and Mg++-activated ATPase (60 to 85%o). Ouabain nerves of the brachial plexus were transected, and an (10' M), which inhibits the Na+-K--dependent ATPase electrode was applied to their distal ends. Pressures were activity and produces a resultant loss of cellular K+, gain recorded simultaneously from the brachial artery and of Na+, and cell swelling, does not inhibit either ADP cephalic vein and from a small artery and small vein in aggregation or clot retraction. ¶f PCMB, an organic the paw. Pressor responses to injections of nor- mercurial compound that diffuses into cells, totally inacti- epinephrine (1, 2, and 4 /.tg) into the brachial artery and vates both ATPase activities in the ghost preparations to nerve stimulation (3, 6, and 12 cps) were measured and in the intact platelet.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals As Environmental Contaminants
    PharmaceuticalsPharmaceuticals asas EnvironmentalEnvironmental Contaminants:Contaminants: anan OverviewOverview ofof thethe ScienceScience Christian G. Daughton, Ph.D. Chief, Environmental Chemistry Branch Environmental Sciences Division National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Environmental Protection Agency Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 [email protected] Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Why and how do drugs contaminate the environment? What might it all mean? How do we prevent it? Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada This talk presents only a cursory overview of some of the many science issues surrounding the topic of pharmaceuticals as environmental contaminants Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada A Clarification We sometimes loosely (but incorrectly) refer to drugs, medicines, medications, or pharmaceuticals as being the substances that contaminant the environment. The actual environmental contaminants, however, are the active pharmaceutical ingredients – APIs. These terms are all often used interchangeably Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Las Vegas, Nevada Office of Research and Development Available: http://www.epa.gov/nerlesd1/chemistry/pharma/image/drawing.pdfNational
    [Show full text]
  • Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium
    PATIENT & CAREGIVER EDUCATION Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium This information from Lexicomp® explains what you need to know about this medication, including what it’s used for, how to take it, its side effects, and when to call your healthcare provider. Brand Names: US Gastrografin; MD-76 R [DSC]; MD-Gastroview [DSC] Brand Names: Canada Gastrografin Warning Injection: This drug must not be given into the spine. What is this drug used for? It is used before an x-ray or other test like it. What do I need to tell the doctor BEFORE my child takes this drug? All products: If your child is allergic to this drug; any part of this drug; or any other drugs, foods, or substances. Tell the doctor about the allergy and what signs your child had. If your child is dehydrated, has been eating poorly, or has used a laxative or Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium 1/8 water pill before this drug. If your child has had a skin reaction to this drug or another drug like it in the past. If your child is taking metformin. Oral liquid: If your child has a health problem that connects the windpipe (trachea) to the swallowing tube (esophagus) called esophagotracheal fistula. This is not a list of all drugs or health problems that interact with this drug. Tell the doctor and pharmacist about all of your child’s drugs (prescription or OTC, natural products, vitamins) and health problems. You must check to make sure that it is safe to give this drug with all of your child’s other drugs and health problems.
    [Show full text]
  • GASTROGRAFIN- Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium Liquid Bracco Diagnostics Inc ------GASTROGRAFIN® Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium Solution USP
    GASTROGRAFIN- diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium liquid Bracco Diagnostics Inc ---------- GASTROGRAFIN® Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium Solution USP DESCRIPTION Gastrografin (Diatrizoate Meglumine and Diatrizoate Sodium Solution) is a palatable lemon-flavored water-soluble iodinated radiopaque contrast medium for oral or rectal administration only. Each mL contains 660 mg diatrizoate meglumine and 100 mg diatrizoate sodium; pH has been adjusted to 6.0 to 7.6 with sodium hydroxide. Each mL contains approximately 4.8 mg (0.21 mEq) sodium and 367 mg organically bound iodine. Inactive ingredients: edetate disodium, flavor, polysorbate 80, purified water, saccharin sodium, simethicone, and sodium citrate. Diatrizoate meglumine is designated chemically as 1-deoxy-1-(methylamino)-D-glucitol 3,5- diacetamido-2,4,6-triiodo-benzoate (salt); diatrizoate sodium is monosodium 3, 5-diacetamido-2,4,6- triiodobenzoate. Structural formulas: CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY The most important characteristic of contrast media is the iodine content. The relatively high atomic weight of iodine contributes sufficient radiodensity for radiographic contrast with surrounding tissues. Diagnostic enteral radiopaque agents have few known pharmacological effects. Diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium exert a mild laxative effect attributable to their high osmolarity. Diatrizoate meglumine and diatrizoate sodium are sparingly absorbed from the intact gastrointestinal tract, and therefore permit gastrointestinal opacification and delineation after oral or rectal administration. Oral administration is used for radiographic evaluation of the esophagus, stomach and proximal small intestine. Rectal administration is used for examination of the colon; however, visualization of the distal small bowel is generally unsatisfactory, since the hypertonicity of the medium causes intraluminal diffusion of water with subsequent dilution of the medium.
    [Show full text]