Domestication of Fynbos Proteaceae As a Floricultural Crop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domestication of Fynbos Proteaceae As a Floricultural Crop Bothalia 14. 3 & 4: 641-646 (1983) Domestication of fynbos Proteaceae as a floricultural crop G. J. BRITS*, G. JACOBS and M. M. VOGTS ABSTRACT Domestication of a South African group of Proteaceae, the proteas, began with their cultivation as exotics in Europe. A growing local interest in their cultivation climaxed in the publication of a popular handbook in 1958. Commercial interest in cultivation and seed sources was stimulated and led to a botanical and horticultural survey of useful species throughout their distribution range in the fynbos. Information pamphlets on cultivation requirements and seed were eventually supplied to the public as an official service. Up to 1970 cut-flowers were harvested in limited quantities, mainly from the western Cape folded mountains, and sold on the European markets. During the last decade, the export trade in fresh Proteaceae flowers has become a significant factor in the national economy. However, the original system of harvesting from the natural habitat has caused serious marketing problems, for instance, poor cut-flower quality and an erratic supply of many species. Increased exploitation has also led to unprecedented disruptive pressure on the fynbos biome system, particularly on the Proteaceae-component. It is clear that the scientific cultivation of the protea family as a floricultural crop is necessary' for its sustained growth as an economic factor, as well as for its natural conservation. The present paper gives an overview of the developments that led to the rise of the fynbos Proteaceae as a commercially cultivated crop in South Africa. RESUME INTÉRÊT HORTICOLE DE L'ACCLIMATATION DES PROTEACÉES DU FYNBOS L ’acclimatation d'un groupe sud-africain de Protéacées les protéas débuta avec leur culture en tant que plantes exotiques en Europe. Un intérêt local croissant pour leur culture aboutit á la publication d'un manuel de vulgarisation en 1958. Un intérêt commercial dans la culture et les sources de semences fut stimulé et conduisit á un inventaire botanique et horticole des espëces utiles dans toute leur aire de repartition dans le fynbos. Des prospectus sur les exigences de leur culture et sur leur propagation furent finalement offerts an public á titre de sen ice officiel. Jusqu’en 1970, les fleurs coupées furent récoltées en quantités limitées, surtout dans les montagnes plissées du Cap occidental, et vendues sur les marches européens. Pendant la derniêre décade, le marché d'exportation de fleurs fraiches de Protéacées est devenu un fracteur important dans iéconomie nationale. Cependant le premier systême de récolte, limité á /’habitat nature!, a causé de sérieux problêmes de commercialisation, par exemple la qualité mediocre des fleurs coupées et un approvisionnement irrégulier pour de nombreuses espêces. Une exploitation accrue a aussi amené une action perturbatrice sans précédent sur l'écosystême du fynbos, particuliêrement sur sa composition cn Protéacées. 11 est clair qu'une exploration scientifique des Protéacées en horticulture est nécessaire tant pour maintenir le développement de ce fracteur économique, que pour protéger la famille á iétat nature/. Le present document donne un aperqu des développements qui ont conduit les Protéacées du fynbos á devenir une culture pratiquée á une échelle commercial en Afrique du Sud. INTRODUCTION interest were the attempts, since 1913, by the The domestication of plants begins with cultiva­ National Botanic Gardens at Kirstenbosch (Vogts, tion. This is, in due course, followed by improve­ 1962) and since about 1940, by two or three ment of techniques and plant material (Jacobs, pioneering growers (Rourke, 1980). Their success 1970). In modern society these functions are usually was based partly on hit-or-miss methods and partly assigned to scientific research. The domestication of on study and observation of the natural habitat. fynbos Proteaceae for horticultural use has been However, all fynbos proteas cultivated with signifi­ profoundly influenced by research contributions in cant success were grown in the winter rainfall area, their country of origin. South Africa. that is, in the region where they grow wild (Vogts, 1982). CULTIVATION The fynbos Proteaceae were first cultivated in RESEARCH Europe, An interest in the exotic plants from the Cape led to the cultivation of a number of species, First phase under highly artificial conditions, during the late 18th and early 19th centuries (Rourke, 1980). From approximately 1960, this limited scientific However, the ‘art’ was soon lost, due to the lack of approach changed. The cultivation requirements of systematic knowledge of the requirements of these proteas were identified, classified and described in a ‘strange’ plants. For the next 150 years, the only popular handbook (Vogts, 1958). The information significant cultivation of the family, popularly was drawn from the results of scientific experimen­ known as proteas, was at the Cape; of special tation, research and observation over a decade, of the behaviour of proteas cultivated outside their distribution range. This publication heralded the rapid establishment of protea cultivation and the * Protea Research Unit, Tygerhoek Experimental Farm. intensification and expansion of research (Vogts, Riviersonderend 7250. South Africa. 1960; Letty, 1962; Rourke, 1980). 642 DOMESTICATION OF FYNBOS PROTEACEAE AS A FLOR(CULTURAL CROP The analysis of the basic cultural requirements of many characteristics including flowering time of 52 species and 8 genera showed remarkable different populations of a species remain stable similarities within the family. Notwithstanding (Vogts, 1971; Vogts, 1980; Vogts, 1977c). It can be deviations in common needs, such as an alkaline soil accepted that the discontinuous topography of the required by some species instead of acid, it was distribution area has contributed to bringing these generally accepted that all fynbos proteas could be variants to the threshold of speciation (Vogts, 1971). considered for further investigation (Vogts, 1958). However, variants of some species may lose their The cultivation potential of proteas focused distinguishing features in cultivation and revert back attention on their economic potential (Vogts, 1982). to the average, their characters obviously dependent World-wide interest in the new and exotic in the on changeable environmental conditions. An exam­ cut-flower trade was indeed an impetus to bring ple is the brilliant red of Leucadendron salignum these wild plants under human control. from the Cold Bokkeveld (Vogts, 1980). At the same time, a breakthrough was achieved Evaluation and selection for further research when South African proteas came on the European Over 150 species in their wild state proved to have flower markets (Middelmann, 1981b). Most of these some economic potential, 86 to a very high degree flowers were harvested directly from plants in the (Vogts, 1972). For practical reasons, only a few habitat. Hopes for the future of cultivation were, could be considered for intensive research. Those however, high and a ‘South African Indigenous with the highest score of combined favourable Flower Growers’ Association’ was formed in 1965 characteristics were chosen. (Anonymous, 1965). Economic and horticultural potential was asses­ sed on a number of points, of which the following Conservation were the most important (Vogts, 1980): The first serious problem which confronted the Attractive and arresting appearance, colour, new phase of horticultural exploitation of proteas, shape and size of flowerhead; foliage attrac­ was the protection of the natural sources of material. tive but not dominating, The exciting new interest in growing proteas for gain Flowerhead not hidden or pendulous, resulted in great numbers of prospective commercial Erect growth providing good flowerstems, growers harvesting plant material in the wild without Good cultivation potential and availability of the necessary know-how. Irreparable harm to rare propagation material, plants, waste of seed collected at the wrong stage, Stability cf characters, and waste due to incorrect cultural methods soon led Desired flowering times, to a disastrous state of affairs. This was eventually Postharvest quality, brought under control, not so much by law No obnoxious odour. enforcement, as by expert guidance (Vogts et al., 1972) and by providing reproductive material Finally, about 14 species and a number of variants of (McCann, 1977; Anonymous, 1980). These official the genera Protea, Leucospermum, Leucadendron conservation actions were based on an awareness of and Serruria were selected for commercial cultiva­ the need to keep the natural resources intact (Vogts, tion. Examples are the red, summer-flowering 1982). variant of Protea repens (Vogts, 1980) and ten variants of Protea cynaroides, chosen to allow year-round production of flowers of this species (Vogts, 1977c). Reconnaissance survey of available resources: species, variants and ecotypes Second phase It was realized by the authorities that, in order to The above-mentioned pioneering research and cope with the growing interest in protea cultivation, publicity were prerequisites to the cultivation of an overall survey of the distribution area of the proteas on a commercial level in South Africa. They 300-odd species of Cape Proteaceae had to be also led to limited attempts at cultivation and undertaken (Nel, 1965). Localities in the south­ research in other countries, for example in New western and southern Cape ranging from Clanwil- Zealand (Brits,
Recommended publications
  • Plant Rescue Management Plan
    Plant Rescue Management Plan 86 MW Oya Wind Energy Facility (WEF) and associated David Hoare Consulting infrastructure between Sutherland and Matjiesfontein, Western and Northern Cape Provinces Plant Rescue Management Plan for the proposed 86 David Hoare MW Oya Wind Energy Consulting (Pty) Ltd Facility between Sutherland and Matjiesfontein in the Address: Western and Northern Cape Postnet Suite #116 Private Bag X025 Lynnwood Ridge Provinces. 0040 41 Soetdoring Avenue Lynnwood Manor Pretoria Telephone: 087 701 7629 Location: Cell: 083 284 5111 Witzenberg Local Municipality within the Cape Winelands District Fax: 086 550 2053 Municipality Email: [email protected] Prepared for Oya Energy (Pty) Ltd 5th Floor, 125 Buitengracht Street Cape Town 8001 Report author: Dr D.B. Hoare (Pr.Sci.Nat.) 13 November 2020 Report version: 1st draft i Details of specialist consultant Company name David Hoare Consulting (Pty) Ltd Registration no.: CK2017/308639/07 Address Postnet Suite #116 Private Bag X025 Lynnwood Ridge 0040 Contact person Dr David Hoare Contact details Cell: 083 284 5111 Email: [email protected] Qualifications PhD Botany (Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University) MSc Botany (University of Pretoria) BSc (Hons) Botany (Rhodes University) BSc Botany, Zoology (Rhodes University) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DETAILS OF SPECIALIST CONSULTANT ........................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • International Cooperation Among Botanic Gardens
    INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AMONG BOTANIC GARDENS: THE CONCEPT OF ESTABLISHING AGREEMENTS By Erich S. Rudyj A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of elaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Public Horticulture Administration May 1988 © 1988 Erich S. Rudyj INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION~ AMONG BOTANIC GARDENS: THE CONCEPT OF EsrtBllSHING AGREEMENTS 8y Erich S. Rudyj Approved: _ James E. Swasey, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: _ James E. Swasey, Ph.D. Coordinator of the Longwood Graduate Program Approved: _ Richard 8. MLfrray, Ph.D. Associate Provost for Graduate Studies No man is an /land, intire of it selfe; every man is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine; if a Clod bee washed away by the Sea, Europe is the lesse, as well as if a Promontorie '-"Jere, as well as if a Mannor of thy friends or of thine owne were; any mans death diminishes me, because I am involved in Mankinde; And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee. - JOHN DONNE - In the Seventeenth Meditation of the Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions (1624) iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to Donald Crossan, James Oliver and James Swasey, who, as members of my thesis committee, provided me with the kind of encouragement and guidance needed to merge both the fields of Public Horticulture and International Affairs. Special thanks are extended to the organizers and participants of the Tenth General Meeting and Conference of the International Association of Botanical Gardens (IABG) for their warmth, advice and indefatigable spirit of international cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • PROTEA ATLAS Protea4.Pdf
    Protea acuminata Sims Blackrim Sugarbush Sederbergroos Other Common Names: Cedarberg Sugarbush, Age to first flowering: First flowers recorded Cedarberg-rose Protea, Angelprotea, at 1 years, 50% estimated at 3-4 years, and Bergrosie, Bierbos. 100% recorded consistently at 9 years. Other Scientific Names: cedromontana Schltr. 1 g in 505 Records er w Population (497 records): 0.4% Abundant, 0.5 18% Common, 60% Frequent, 21% Rare, s flo 1% Extinct. % Site Dispersion (445 records): 64% variable, 0 0123456789101112 31% clumped, 3% widespread, 2% evenly Age (Years after fire) distributed. Height (489 records): 7% 0-0.2 m tall, Flowering (488 records with: Jan 21, Feb 54, 70% 0.2-1 m tall, 22% 1-2 m tall. Mar 87, Apr 23, May 24, Jun 40, Jul 3, Aug Pollinators (6 records): 67% bees or wasps, 34, Sep 33, Oct 81, Nov 66, Dec 22): Buds 17% birds, 17% beetles. from Feb to May and Sep; Flowering from Detailed Pollinators (3 records): Honey Bee. Jun to Aug; Peak Flowering not significant; Over from Jul and Dec; Fruit from Sep to Habitat: Feb; Nothing from Mar to Apr. Peak levels Distance to Ocean (495 records): 100% inland at 83% in Jun. Historically recorded as 2320 - further than 2 km from Altitude (m) flowering from Jun to Sep, peaking Jul to coast. 2120 Aug. Altitude (495 records): 60 - 1920 1660 m; 760 lq - 960 med - 1720 1140 uqm. 1520 1320 Landform (488 records): 1120 72% deep soil, 920 22% shallow soil, 6% rocky 620 outcrops. 420 Slope (492 records): 220 56% gentle incline, 20 25% steep incline, 0 0.05 0.1 11% platform, 5% hill top, 2% valley JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN bottom.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Fact Sheets: Threatened Species
    Biodiversity Fact Sheets: Threatened Species * Supplementary document to a series of 8 biodiversity fact sheets* RED LIST PLANTS Critically Endangered (CR) Afrolimon purpuratum CR Aristea ericifolia erecta CR Arctotheca forbesiana CR Aspalathus aculeata CR Aspalathus horizontalis CR Aspalathus rycroftii CR Babiana leipoldtii CR Babiana regia CR Babiana secunda CR Cadiscus aquaticus CR Cephalophyllum parviflorum CR Chrysocoma esterhuyseniae CR Cliffortia acockii CR Cotula myriophylloides CR Cyclopia latifolia CR Diastella proteoides CR Disa barbata CR Disa nubigena CR Disa physodes CR Disa sabulosa CR Erica abietina diabolis CR Erica bolusiae bolusiae CR Erica heleogena CR Erica malmesburiensis CR Erica margaritacea CR Erica ribisaria CR Erica sociorum CR Erica ustulescens CR Erica vallis‐aranearum CR Geissorhiza eurystigma CR Geissorhiza malmesburiensis CR Geissorhiza purpurascens CR Gladiolus aureus CR Gladiolus griseus CR Hermannia procumbens procumbens CR Holothrix longicornu CR Ixia versicolor CR Lachenalia arbuthnotiae CR Lachenalia purpureo ‐caerulea CR Lampranthus tenuifolius CR Leucadendron floridum CR Leucadendron lanigerum laevigatum CR Leucadendron levisanus CR Leucadendron macowanii CR Leucadendron stellare CR Leucadendron thymifolium CR Leucadendron verticillatum CR Marasmodes oligocephala CR Marasmodes polycephala CR Metalasia distans CR Mimetes hottentoticus CR Moraea angulata CR Moraea aristata CR Muraltia satureioides salteri CR Oxalis natans CR Podalyria microphylla CR Polycarena silenoides CR Protea odorata CR Psoralea
    [Show full text]
  • IUCN / TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES
    English summary cover:analyses landscape 02/02/2010 17:25 Page 1 Summary of IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 15th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha, Qatar 13–25 March 2010 Prepared by IUCN Species Programme and Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC ANALYSES English summary cover:analyses landscape 02/02/2010 17:25 Page 2 Summary of IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 15th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha, Qatar 13–25 March 2010 Prepared by IUCN Species Programme and Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC France, Ministère de Germany, Federal Ministry for the l'Écologie, de l'Énergie, Finland, Ministry of the Environment European Commission Environment, Nature Conservation Monaco, Government du Développement and Nuclear Safety (BMU) of Monaco durable et de la Mer Sweden, Naturvårdsverket - Netherlands, Ministry Swiss Confederation, Federal United States, US Fish Swedish Environmental Belgium, DG Animaux, Denmark, Danish Forest of Agriculture, Nature Department of Economic Affairs & Wildlife Service Protection Agency Végétaux et Alimentation and Nature Agency and Food Quality (FDEA), Veterinary Office Production of the 2010 IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices was made possible through the generous support of: • European Commission – Directorate General for the Environment • USA – US Fish & Wildlife Service • France – Ministère de l'Écologie, de l'Energie, du Développement durable et de la Mer • Sweden
    [Show full text]
  • CREW Newsletter – 2021
    Volume 17 • July 2021 Editorial 2020 By Suvarna Parbhoo-Mohan (CREW Programme manager) and Domitilla Raimondo (SANBI Threatened Species Programme manager) May there be peace in the heavenly virtual platforms that have marched, uninvited, into region and the atmosphere; may peace our homes and kept us connected with each other reign on the earth; let there be coolness and our network of volunteers. in the water; may the medicinal herbs be healing; the plants be peace-giving; may The Custodians of Rare and Endangered there be harmony in the celestial objects Wildflowers (CREW), is a programme that and perfection in eternal knowledge; may involves volunteers from the public in the everything in the universe be peaceful; let monitoring and conservation of South peace pervade everywhere. May peace abide Africa’s threatened plants. CREW aims to in me. May there be peace, peace, peace! capacitate a network of volunteers from a range of socio-economic backgrounds – Hymn of peace adopted to monitor and conserve South Africa’s from Yajur Veda 36:17 threatened plant species. The programme links volunteers with their local conservation e are all aware that our lives changed from the Wend of March 2020 with a range of emotions, agencies and particularly with local land from being anxious of not knowing what to expect, stewardship initiatives to ensure the to being distressed upon hearing about friends and conservation of key sites for threatened plant family being ill, and sometimes their passing. De- species. Funded jointly by the Botanical spite the incredible hardships, we have somehow Society of South Africa (BotSoc), the Mapula adapted to the so-called new normal of living during Trust and the South African National a pandemic and are grateful for the commitment of the CREW network to continue conserving and pro- Biodiversity Institute (SANBI), CREW is an tecting our plant taxa of conservation concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Patterns and Dynamics of Renosterveld at Agter-Groeneberg Conservancy, Western Cape, South Africa
    Vegetation Patterns and Dynamics of Renosterveld at Agter-Groeneberg Conservancy, Western Cape, South Africa By Benjamin Alan Walton Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science at the Stellenbosch University Supervisor Professor Sue J Milton (Department of Conservation Ecology) Co-supervisors A le Roux (CapeNature) Professor L Mucina (Department of Botany and Zoology) April 2006 i Φ Poem “Colour awash over forelands of fertile clay” “When the winters’ cold and grim the Oxalis’s start to brim - they open up. The first feast for bees, in the shrubland short of trees not breeze. Sun’s rays soon last longer in the days: Babianas, Chlorophytums, Geissorhizas, Gladiolius’s, Hesperanthas, Lachenalias, Moraeas and Trachyandras spread their cheerful gaze. Accompanied by annual daisies and bright gladioli filling the air with strong scents of honey - monkey beetles waste no time as they perch upon delicate flowers, lest they are caught in the season’s showers. As if to suggest this is the best nature sends small midge flies to pollinate in jest, and surround mammals to tease their bloody channels. Another month has come and gone - not long now for the raaptol and Micranthus which provide nectar for brown butterflies and painted ladies. Then is the last sequence of bulbs - the fine white-filled fields of chinkerinchees. Grasses’ hour is now soaking up the sun displaying beautifully crafted silhouettes till summers end. As if heaven sent delicate geophytes are still producing their charm, when botanists avoid the midday sun. A brief lapse in displays until the autumn reds begin the seasonal cycles.” Figure a: From left to right: Moraea villosa (Ker Gawl.) Ker Gawl.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Floristic Region Biodiversity Hotspot
    PORTFOLIO REVIEW CAPE FLORISTIC REGION BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT September 2004 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 Background 2 CEPF Monitoring Approach 3 CAPE FLORISTIC REGION CONSERVATION CONTEXT 4 Cape Action Plan for People and the Environment 6 National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 10 Framework for Conservation in the Cape Floristic Region 10 CAPE FLORISTIC REGION – THE CEPF ECOSYSTEM PROFILE 11 Logical Framework 13 C.A.P.E. and CEPF Implementation 14 CEPF GRANTMAKING IN THE CAPE FLORISTIC REGION 15 Portfolio Overview 15 Coordination and Communication of CEPF Strategy 19 PROGRAM IMPACT 21 Strategic Direction 1: Civil Society Involved in Protected Areas and Management Plans 21 Strategic Direction 2: Private Sector Involved in Corridor Landscapes 24 Strategic Direction 3: Institutional Environment for Conservation Action 26 Strategic Direction 4: Small Grants Program 27 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT 28 Project Submissions 28 Project Design Phase 29 Use of Project Design and Reporting Tools 29 Project Monitoring and Reporting 30 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 APPENDICES 37 1 INTRODUCTION Background The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. It is designed to help safeguard the world’s biologically richest and most threatened areas. Known as biodiversity hotspots, these areas are classified by their concentration of unique species and the degree of threat. A fundamental purpose of CEPF is to engage civil society, such as community groups, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and private enterprises, in biodiversity conservation. CEPF focuses on building this civil society constituency alongside national and local governments in ways that complement existing strategies and ultimately benefit nature and people alike.
    [Show full text]
  • PC18 Inf. 12 (English Only / Únicamente En Inglés / Seulement En Anglais)
    PC18 Inf. 12 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________ Eighteenth meeting of the Plants Committee Buenos Aires (Argentina), 17-21 March 2009 DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II: PROTEA ODORATA The attached document has been submitted by South Africa*. * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. PC18 Inf. 12 – p. 1 PC18 Inf. 12 Annex DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II: PROTEA ODORATA A. PROPOSAL It is proposed that Protea odorata be delisted from Appendix II following downlisting from Appendix I to Appendix II in 1997 in accordance with precautionary measure B.2.a) as specified in Annex 4 of Resolution Conf. 9.24. B. PROPONENT The Republic of South Africa C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Dicotyledonae 1.2 Order: Proteales 1.3 Family: Proteaceae 1.4 Genus and species: Protea odorata Thunb. 1800 (Rourke 1980) 1.5 Synonyms: Leucadendron odoratum (Thunb.) R.Br., Protea mucroni/olia Salisb. var. gueinzii Meisn. (Rourke 1980) 1.6 Common names: Swartland sugarbush (Rebelo 1995) 1.7 Code number 2. Biological Parameters 2.1 Distribution Data from the Protea Atlas Project shows that the population of P.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLISHER S Thunberg Herbarium
    Guide ERBARIUM H Thunberg Herbarium Guido J. Braem HUNBERG T Uppsala University AIDC PUBLISHERP U R L 1 5H E R S S BRILLB RI LL Thunberg Herbarium Uppsala University GuidoJ. Braem Guide to the microform collection IDC number 1036 !!1DC1995 THE THUNBERG HERBARIUM ALPHABETICAL INDEX Taxon Fiche Taxon Fiche Number Number -A- Acer montanum 1010/15 Acer neapolitanum 1010/19-20 Abroma augusta 749/2-3 Acer negundo 1010/16-18 Abroma wheleri 749/4-5 Acer opalus 1010/21-22 Abrus precatorius 683/24-684/1 Acer palmatum 1010/23-24 Acacia ? 1015/11 Acer pensylvanicum 1011/1-2 Acacia horrida 1013/18 Acer pictum 1011/3 Acacia ovata 1014/17 Acer platanoides 1011/4-6 Acacia tortuosa 1015/18-19 Acer pseudoplatanus 1011/7-8 Acalypha acuta 947/12-14 Acer rubrum 1011/9-11 Acalypha alopecuroidea 947/15 Acer saccharinum 1011/12-13 Acalypha angustifblia 947/16 Acer septemlobum. 1011/14 Acalypha betulaef'olia 947/17 Acer sp. 1011/19 Acalypha ciliata 947/18 Acer tataricum 1011/15-16 Acalypha cot-data 947/19 Acer trifidum 1011/17 Acalypha cordifolia 947/20 Achania malvaviscus 677/2 Acalypha corensis 947/21 Achania pilosa 677/3-4 Acalypha decumbens 947/22 Acharia tragodes 922/22 Acalypha elliptica 947/23 Achillea abrotanifolia 852/3 Acalypha glabrata 947/24 Achillea aegyptiaca 852/4 Acalypha hernandifolia 948/1 Achillea ageratum 852/5-6 Acalypha indica 948/2 Achillea alpina 8.52/7-9 Acalypha javanica 948/3-4 Achillea asplenif'olia 852/10-11 Acalypha laevigata 948/5 Achillea atrata 852/12 Acalypha obtusa 948/6 Achillea biserrata 8.52/13 Acalypha ovata 948/7-8 Achillea cartilaginea 852/14 Acalypha pastoris 948/9 Achillea clavennae 852/15 Acalypha pectinata 948/10 Achillea compacta 852/16-17 Acalypha peduncularis 948/20 Achillea coronopifolia 852/18 Acalypha reptans 948/11 Achillea cretica 852/19 Acalypha scabrosa 948/12-13 Achillea cristata 852/20 Acalypha sinuata 948/14 Achillea distans 8.52/21 Acalypha sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin for Gardeners: Over 3,000 Plant Names Explained and Explored
    L ATIN for GARDENERS ACANTHUS bear’s breeches Lorraine Harrison is the author of several books, including Inspiring Sussex Gardeners, The Shaker Book of the Garden, How to Read Gardens, and A Potted History of Vegetables: A Kitchen Cornucopia. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 © 2012 Quid Publishing Conceived, designed and produced by Quid Publishing Level 4, Sheridan House 114 Western Road Hove BN3 1DD England Designed by Lindsey Johns All rights reserved. Published 2012. Printed in China 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 1 2 3 4 5 ISBN-13: 978-0-226-00919-3 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-00922-3 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Harrison, Lorraine. Latin for gardeners : over 3,000 plant names explained and explored / Lorraine Harrison. pages ; cm ISBN 978-0-226-00919-3 (cloth : alkaline paper) — ISBN (invalid) 978-0-226-00922-3 (e-book) 1. Latin language—Etymology—Names—Dictionaries. 2. Latin language—Technical Latin—Dictionaries. 3. Plants—Nomenclature—Dictionaries—Latin. 4. Plants—History. I. Title. PA2387.H37 2012 580.1’4—dc23 2012020837 ∞ This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). L ATIN for GARDENERS Over 3,000 Plant Names Explained and Explored LORRAINE HARRISON The University of Chicago Press Contents Preface 6 How to Use This Book 8 A Short History of Botanical Latin 9 Jasminum, Botanical Latin for Beginners 10 jasmine (p. 116) An Introduction to the A–Z Listings 13 THE A-Z LISTINGS OF LatIN PlaNT NAMES A from a- to azureus 14 B from babylonicus to byzantinus 37 C from cacaliifolius to cytisoides 45 D from dactyliferus to dyerianum 69 E from e- to eyriesii 79 F from fabaceus to futilis 85 G from gaditanus to gymnocarpus 94 H from haastii to hystrix 102 I from ibericus to ixocarpus 109 J from jacobaeus to juvenilis 115 K from kamtschaticus to kurdicus 117 L from labiatus to lysimachioides 118 Tropaeolum majus, M from macedonicus to myrtifolius 129 nasturtium (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment for the Establishment of the Proposed SAGIT Langhoogte Wind Farm, Western Cape Province
    Environmental Impact Assessment for the Establishment of the proposed SAGIT Langhoogte Wind Farm, Western Cape Province Environmental Scoping Report FLORA & FAUNA SPECIALIST STUDY Dr David Hoare (Ph.D., Pr.Sci.Nat.) David Hoare Consulting cc 41 Soetdoring Ave Lynnwood Manor, Pretoria Date: 7 January 2012 DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE I, David Hoare as duly authorised representative of David Hoare Consulting cc, hereby confirm my independence (as well as that of David Hoare Consulting cc) as the flora & fauna specialist for the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Establishment of the Langhoogte Wind Farm and declare that neither I nor David Hoare Consulting cc have any interest, be it business, financial, personal or other, in any proposed activity, application or appeal in respect of which Arcus GIBB was appointed as environmental assessment practitioner in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), other than fair remuneration for work performed in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act) for the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Establishment of the Langhoogte Wind Farm. I further declare that I am confident in the results of the studies undertaken and conclusions drawn as a result of it. I have disclosed, to the environmental assessment practitioner, in writing, any material information that have or may have the potential to influence the decision of the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or document required in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2010 and any specific environmental management Act. I have further provided the environmental assessment practitioner with written access to all information at my disposal regarding the application, whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not.
    [Show full text]