DOGAMI Open-File Report O-11-06, Stream Channels of the Tualatin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DOGAMI Open-File Report O-11-06, Stream Channels of the Tualatin G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N Open-File Report O-11-06 M E T R R A A L P STATE OF OREGON I Stream Channels of the Tualatin Valley and Lower Willamette River, E N D D U N S O Stream Channels of the Tualatin Valley and Lower Willamette River, T G R DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES E I R E S O Clackamas, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill Counties, Oregon VICKI S. MCCONNELL, STATE GEOLOGIST Clackamas, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill Counties, Oregon 1937 by Daniel Coe 2011 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries A' 123°13'52"W 123°10'0"W 123°5'0"W 123°0'0"W 122°55'0"W 122°50'0"W 122°45'0"W 122°41'37"W Clatsop Columbia C 45°39'27"N County o 45°40'0"N County l Map Symbols Inset B u m Map Area b View i a Highway e W R e s S a u v i e I s l a n d i g Tillamook t t v OREGON F e Street County Hood River o r Washington r n Multnomah County County k k M County D u Major Bridge lt a n a ir y y om ah State Boundary e C C Clackamas re h R ek an County ne Yamhill g l County Boundary N County W n S t a u M A' a v u s e ie d Wasco S Is l l o R County a u Cross Section a Marion g Burlington n h Polk d d A County County R r o d d e Washington R e E iv Inset C a s ihan R C t t ill e View Inset View Direction t d F NW G et Oregon o m Benton Linn Jefferson G a r l a k u l Lincoln County County County k i D m e a iry Cre W County e e m r k c C C r s s e e s m t k S r d a ar F b a k k Lom SCALE 1:36,000 ar N N P Lane C 0 1 2 Miles County Bl edso Willamette River e Creek 0 1 2 Kilometers Basin Deschutes County Banks N Marine Dr d 122°40'0"W R Ba k usch o C Cree edar k ro Cany b on Cr y eek d a k h e N Lombard St Lombard N Klamath e Douglas OR-6 S e r M Bybee Lak County C c County W W y C Coos N a a r K t County c h y y M C re ek Clark County Smith Lake Multnomah County NW Sk OR-120 ylin e B lv Colum d bia River 122°35'0"W North 45°36'24"N W e Plains st F o r k k NE D Mar a ine Dr i y C Il r er r Cr e ek U eek e re S k T - C 3 y 0 N C re olumbia o Bl t vd 45°35'0"N S u R o c k C a re H ek o lc o l m b C r N Lombard St e I e - n Rd 5 k antow a NW Germ US-30BY reek Ab bey C t 45°35'0"N i Colu d US-30BY mbia Slough R e e n o c n e l G NE Columbia Blvd D W a N v i M d H Multnomah County i N InterstateAve l US-26 o l Washington County D a i r u y y Cr e e k n W il lam et O G t e R k e e NW 185thAve t R on Cr - Daws iv a e 9 O r 9 W A R l l Rockcreek a - m 8 a e e d US-26 a R s i d g e Inset C eek i P Cr View onson M r B NE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd e cK a y y a n C r k e e Oak k I-5 Hills s NW Co C u n o cil Cr rn Cedar eek D ell a Rd vd i C l ry d B NE 82ndAve r y e NE Cornell R Mill nd e k Sa e h k E c e N l r C u G Ro ck S a G l e s s I-84 US-30 u C n r eek low Creek a Wil l l i v Forest N Hillsboro W Corn Grove Cornelius ell Rd 5 0 Bea 4 ve - rto I OR-8 n Cr ee k W Burnside St Portland e S E Burnsid t C a rp en te r Creek M ill Creek o J r M u a eda nt ck C s o T n n 45°30'0"N a S b l o S o u W r g h W a lk R e r R Cedar o d tin Riv c a e k u al r Hills T C OR-8 r e OR-47 e k 7 1 2 - R West O Bea verto Slope 45°30'0"N D n Cr il eek SE Powell Blvd l O US-26 ey Aloha R Cr e - ek 1 0 SW 185thAve H OR-213 ag Beaverton g SE Foster Rd L OR-10 a J k o e h n Raleigh Hills st W o n n i l C l a r e m e F k e O t t R e - e SW Murray Blvd 9 R 9 r E i n ve r H d F R r a r r n e i n e v o l v i i C R l R reek n n i W t k S a Davi ee l s Cr a u k T e S c e o r ggins C reek C s s g SE 82ndAve n i SW Oleson Rd r p S son J hn C l l o re a e t k s y r C OR-10 C o o p e r Rd M o l l u l i n OR-141 ack Jack C t C l reek H B r a M l e i a n u c g g I te sen Cr v n is i l k n hr e t i C e R n a r o k n n o m p i w t m a S a s a l a a h C W W u Metzger o C S T H o u u n t i n y t T in l y u a lat River O l R - 21 Gaston 7 Ash Cree k Milwaukie I-5 S W W k urris Cr e e R B iv e r r Rd OR-210 d Tigard R OR-224 ak Pe d o al M un B t Scott H T C r i W r eek l l S yo C n 45°25'0"N re ek C re ek SW Laurel Rd 3 4 - R O Kel logg C Lake reek B u l l M o u n Oswego t a i A n y e rs C OR-219 re e k 45°25'0"N k Oak e e r C o o Grove Oswe n go Creek n a y t F n y ke t a u L n ee go o M Cr k we u c Fee Os C o n n C King o l l C l t i g h n i m h City a Johnson s Durham Y to Creek a pa W Wa h tin River City Tuala S e W W B a d ld h l ek P a re e n a a C k l t k a R ee Jennings r SW Tualatin Rd o C S d ton C OR-141 Rivergrove a Hea g e w Lodge s dges Creek O l He OR-99W I-205 OR-213 k ee d r R e Chi C y y c k n Tualatin e e l l a V k e h t m e r r o C N d d n E a l N er w Gladstone iv o R R s M Cla ckam a Inset A OR-99W View N I-205 E B o ald Peak R d d u R d d r o ff a C t n e S da r W C S r e t e k West a k Linn e e Abern r ethy Creek C i l l il h n m Sherwood a Y I- 2 s 0 5 Oregon City O w Creek R llo - Stag Ho 2 1 Yamhill 3 N P o r e t t h h e Ya llam m O s Wi ette hill Riv R e 45°20'0"N r - M 2 l R 9E Fa ls 4 o -9 0 ck o R C O OR-47 r u Tuala e tin R e n iver k er t v N i e C R w he C a e hal NE North Valley Rd o tt e em f i e l C f m l NE Bell Rd e n a C re e ll e i r ee B L k a W r 9 k k y e Washington County 1 3 a 2 C - 1 n n R r O ee Clackamas County 2 C k - re R e O k 45°20'0"N 45°19'6"N 123°12'54"W 123°10'0"W 123°5'0"W 123°0'0"W 122°55'0"W 122°50'0"W 122°45'0"W 122°40'0"W 122°35'0"W 122°34'5"W A This map depicts streams of the Tualatin Valley and the Lower Willamette River water and land areas.
Recommended publications
  • Dairy Creek Prospectus
    February 28, 2019 WETLAND MITIGATION BANK PROSPECTUS FOR: THE DAIRY CREEK MITIGATION BANK Located in Banks, Washington County, Oregon Sponsored by: Wolverine LLC 6770 Canyon Drive Portland, Oregon 97225 and Lone Oak Land and Investments LLC 34059 NW Mountaindale Road North Plains, Oregon 97133 Prepared by: C. Jonas Moiel, Senior Ecologist Green Banks LLC 14200 SE McLoughlin Blvd, Suite A Milwaukie, Oregon 97267 (503) 477-5391 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW………………………………………..1 2. SITE AND SPONSOR INFORMATION...................................................1 3. PURPOSE…………………………………………………………………….2 4. SITE SUITABILITY AND FUNCTION GAINS……………………………..3 4.1 Site Suitability…………………………………………………………3 4.2 DSL Principal Objective OAR 141-085-0680………………………4 5. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY…………………………………………………..8 5.1 Soils…………………………………………………………………….8 5.2 Hydrology………………………………………………………………9 5.3 Vegetation……………………………………………………………..9 6. ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION…………………………………….10 7. LONG-TERM PLAN………………………………………………………….11 8. MITIGATION MARKET ANALYSIS………………………………………...11 9. SERVICE AREA………………………………………………………………12 MAPS AND FIGURES : Figure 1a: Site Location Map Figure 1b: Tax Lot Map Figure 2: NRCS Soils Map Figure 3a: Recent Aerial Photo Figures 3b-c: Historic Aerial Photos Figure 4a: Hydrological Degradation Map Figure 4b: Conceptual Design Map Figure 4c: Conceptual Vegetation Class Map Figure 4d: Conceptual HGM Class Map Figure 5: Service Area Map Figure 6: Topography Map from LiDAR (2007) DAIRY CREEK MITIGATION BANK PROSPECTUS i 1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW A mitigation bank is an aquatic habitat created, restored, enhanced, or preserved in accordance with state and federal regulations to compensate for unavoidable adverse impacts to wetlands and other aquatic resources, as authorized by the Oregon Department of State Lands (DSL) and/or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps).
    [Show full text]
  • 2005–2006 Assessment of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities of the Tualatin River Basin, Oregon
    FINAL REPORT 2005–2006 ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES OF THE TUALATIN RIVER BASIN, OREGON MICHAEL B. COLE JENA L. LEMKE CHRISTOPHER R. CURRENS PREPARED FOR CLEAN WATER SERVICES HILLSBORO, OREGON PREPARED BY ABR, INC.–ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & SERVICES FOREST GROVE, OREGON 2005-2006 ASSESSMENT OF FISH AND MACROINVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES OF THE TUALATIN RIVER BASIN, OREGON FINAL REPORT Prepared for Clean Water Services 2550 SW Hillsboro Highway Hillsboro, OR 97123-9379 By Michael B. Cole, Jena L. Lemke, and Christopher Currens ABR, Inc.--Environmental Research and Services P.O. Box 249 Forest Grove, OR 97116 August 2006 Printed on recycled paper. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RIVPACS O/E scores from high-gradient reaches ranged from 0.24 to 1.05 and averaged • Biological monitoring with fish and 0.72, while multimetric scores ranged from 11 macroinvertebrate communities is widely used to 46 and averaged 27.9. The two approaches to determine the ecological integrity of surface produced similar impairment-class groupings, waters. Such surveys directly assess the status as almost half of the high-gradient-reach of surface waters relative to the primary goal macroinvertebrate communities that scored as of the Clean Water Act and provide unimpaired according to O/E scores also information valuable to water quality planning received unimpaired multimetric scores. and management. As such, fish and Upper Gales Creek received both the highest macroinvertebrate communities are O/E and multimetric scores of 1.05 and 46, periodically assessed by Clean Water Services respectively. Three sites received “fair” O/E to assist with water quality management in the scores ranging from 0.779 to 0.877.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bug's Life in the Columbia Slough
    A Bug’s Life in the Columbia Slough: Handbook of Invertebrates and Macroinvertebrate Monitoring in the Columbia Slough June 2005 Jeff Adams WWW.COLUMBIASLOUGH.ORG Contacts: The Xerces Society for Invertebrate The Columbia Slough Watershed Conservation Council Jeff Adams Ethan Chessin [email protected] [email protected] Director of Aquatic Programs Volunteer Coodinator 4828 SE Hawtorhne Blvd. 7040 NE 47th Avenue Portland, OR 97215-3252 Portland, OR 97218-1212 503-232-6639 503-281-1132 http://www.xerces.org http://www.columbiaslough.org Funding for this handbook and the education and monitoring activities associated with this project has been provided by: ! Metropolitan Greenspaces Program – a partnership between Metro and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ! The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation member contributions ! Northwest Service Academy ! Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board ! City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services' Community Watershed Stewardship Program All image credits belong to Jeff Adams with the following exceptions: the Joseph D. Meyers map of Portland vicinity was downloaded from the Center for Columbia River History website; the image with line drawings of a water strider and a back swimmer is used with permission from the University of Illinois Department of Entomology; and the images of the creeping water bug, left-handed snail, and sponge are used with permission from Daniel Pickard of the California Department of Fish and Game. (Cover photo: restoration site on Columbia Slough near Interstate 205. The benches had recently been created, but had not yet been planted with native vegetation.) Handbook of Macroinvertebrate Monitoring in the Columbia Slough TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nificant Natural Area Sites and Interconnections
    .~­ ". \ i' .- / ,.• --- ./ \. \ ~ • I. • h j . .LC .' \. \ \ '.', ."'- /_ ,I • ~, I • ,{ \ I j .' ,,'" "..', r -, " (. ) ./ ..~, / / --)" ( , / '- L • r-( ."• \ " • ." L •~ rr ('., r I" ~••. / r ~ ). ," , \ . ) / ) •. ~ \ '-: '.' / -' ", ,'; ---' -, ", - ( '..\~ , " ' '. ,J \. ) .~ .\ / -" ,e.' ·r ","." ~ METROPOLITAN - e> )~ .' \ I" e :\(?-reel1space~, :- J • 'f /' r: /. ..../ .J \ • ~.' / l .. 'v' /". • '> I / I e-, ~ ./ ,I \ • .>" ) Master-Piait ) e• .,/ r ", / Ij .'-..... L e "'" '. \ e ( r e /. e e, , --- '~. e j -.', ,.­ ;' r .. •er, ) r / -'. ~ \' - ( . ~ . ., ~ ~' -\ A Cooperative Regio!lal$ystem ofNa.tural Areas, "Open Space, T~f!:..ils a~¢ Gree.nways / /', ' '.)' " forWilcJlife and p,!ople . ./( . ./ ,... ' .... / r • '. X- •.\ / e ! -, "e- ( \ - '- '\ .J • r~gional go~ernmeht (As' ofJuly 1992) "- (. • Metro is the 'directly elected thatserves , .. ,/ Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington cOUlities andilie 24 Policy Advisory COn:'!m,ittee M,ember;s: • \'citiesThat make up the P~rtlana metropolita~;rea. " "'- Ri~hard Devlin, Metro councilor and chair •e- Metr~is ;~spon~ible f~r soli~:~aste management, op~ration/of Ruth~cFariana, Metro,co~n;ilor rmd vice-chair ,_ .i ,'-- M~tro us~ \, the Washington Park Zoo, transportation-and land Sandi Hansen/Metro councilor " "- ~" ' pl~nping, 1da~inerstad, commissi~ne~ urban growth boundary management, technical ." J Judie Clackamas County . ,. services to local go\\ernments and, 'through the Metropolitan Pauline Anderson, Multnomah County commissioner ) r·, ) : fxposition)Recre,ation Gommission,man~gementofthe
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Local Watershed Council" Under Oregon Law
    BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. 2015-016 Recognizing the COLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL as a "Voluntary Local Watershed Council" Under Oregon Law. The Multnomah County Board of Commissioners Finds: a. "Voluntary local watershed councils" consist of a majority of local residents, including local officials. (Oregon Revised Statute 541.910(1)). b. "Voluntary local watershed councils" must report their activities periodically to the Board of County Commissioners. (Oregon Revised Statute 541.910(3)). c. The Columbia Slough has been declared water quality limited by the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. d. The Columbia Slough Watershed lies within the jurisdictions of Multnomah County, City of Portland, City of Gresham, and City of Fairview. e. The Columbia Slough Watershed Council is a local, citizen-led organization organized in 1994 reflecting the interests of the watershed, with representation from local government, special purpose districts, neighborhoods, businesses, environmental interests, recreation advocates, scientists, and educators. f. The Columbia Slough Watershed Council meets State and Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board guidelines. g. The Columbia Slough Watershed Council has requested formal recognition by the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners. h. Formal recognition will enable the watershed council to be eligible for Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board grant funds to support council activities directed to assessing watershed conditions, developing action plans, implementing projects, and educating watershed residents. Public stewardship and public involvement are critical elements in improving and protecting water quality and watershed health in the Columbia Slough watershed to meet County goals for clean water. The Multnomah County Board of Commissioners Resolves: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Portland Watershed Health Index ASCE-EWRG & APWA 2012 Sustainable Stormwater Symposium Acknowledgements
    City of Portland Watershed Health Index ASCE-EWRG & APWA 2012 Sustainable Stormwater Symposium Acknowledgements Portland City Council BESPresentation and GSI MarchTeam 8, 2006 It takes a Community to create •Jenniferand Antak, implement Shannonan effective Axtell - BES Watershed •JuliePlan Wilson, GSI Portland Watershed Management Plan Portland City Council WatershedPresentation Approach March 8, 2006 •Cost-effective restoration integratedIt takes a Community •Adaptiveto create strategies and •Addressimplement multiple regulatory requirements.an effective Watershed Plan *Rather than starting with the regulations, Portland focuses on goals and strategies for healthy watersheds. 5 Portland Watersheds Portland Watershed Management Plan Portland Watershed Management Plan Clean Water Act MS4, NPDES and TMDLs CSO Control Stipulated Order Safe Drink Water Act UICs and Groundwater CERCLA (Superfund) Portland Watershed Portland Harbor Management Plan Projects, programs Objectives and and policies Endangered Species Act Salmon and Steelhead Strategies Oregon Statewide Planning Goals 5, 6 and 15 Natural Resource Protection Air, Water and Land Quality Willamette Greenway METRO Growth Management Policies Titles 3 and 13 Portland City Code and Comprehensive Plan NEW? Portland Watershed Management Plan Key Milestones 5-Year Strategy Watershed Plan Milestones •2006: Portland Watershed Management Plan (PWMP) (est. objectives, strategies and actions) •2009: Measures: priority indicators and metrics •2010: Watershed Health Index •2010: Portland Area Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Program (PAWMAP) •2011: First year of PAWMAP data collection •Completion of 5-year Strategy •2012: Watershed Health Index Finalized Watershed Monitoring Objectives Why do we monitor? And how to ensure that monitoring supports watershed restoration efforts. Watershed Health Goals • Hydrology – Move toward normative stream flow conditions to protect and improve watershed and stream health, channel functions, and public health and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Slough Sediment Cleanup: Option for Liability Release Through Cash Settlements
    Fact Sheet Columbia Slough Sediment Cleanup: Option for Liability Release Through Cash Settlements Background Alternative approach The Department of Environmental Quality In 2008, DEQ provided an alternative option for issued a Record of Decision in 2005 that parties to settle their potential liability for Northwest Region provides the framework for cleaning up Columbia Slough sediment contamination. DEQ Cleanup Program contaminated sediment within the Columbia developed a settlement framework that calculates 700 NE Multnomah St. Slough. The primary components of this a “cash-out” payment for each facility based on Suite 600 framework are: estimated costs that would be incurred in a Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5040 sediment investigation and cleanup. Settling 800-452-4011 • Upland source control parties would pay this amount to a state fund Fax: 503-229-5850 • Sediment hot spot remediation dedicated to sediment investigation and cleanup Contact: Sarah Miller • Monitored natural recovery of priority areas within the Columbia Slough. As www.oregon.gov/DEQ of October 2019, DEQ has completed 16 The Columbia Slough is an approximately 31- settlements under this approach and is mile waterway extending from Fairview Lake, negotiating four additional settlements. near the city of Fairview, to Kelly Point Park near the confluence of the Willamette and The basic settlement amount associated with a Columbia Rivers. Sediment in the Columbia single discharge point to the slough has remained Slough is contaminated with a variety of the same since 2009. DEQ increased the amount hazardous substances such as PCBs, pesticides on March 30, 2018, in consideration of two and metals. Industrial, commercial and factors: cost inflation and our experience agricultural facilities located along the Columbia conducting and overseeing sediment cleanup Slough may have contributed to sediment projects in the Columbia Slough, which have contamination through wastewater discharge, cost between $500,000 and $2 million dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Slough Sediment Analysis
    Columbia Slough Sediment Analysis 2006 Sampling Prepared by: City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services January 2009 Prepared for: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Page intentionally left blank EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Portland, Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) have been engaged in investigating and improving sediment quality in the Columbia Slough for over ten years. During this time, extensive remedial investigations, focused investigations, and feasibility studies have been conducted. BES is currently participating in the state’s Voluntary Cleanup Program to address contaminated sediments in the Slough. As part of the program, BES and DEQ signed an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) which describes the actions each agency will take to address sediment quality including conducting long-term monitoring. The Long-term Monitoring Plan, which is an element of the remedial approach for the Columbia Slough, includes sampling fish and sediment every 10 years to assess progress in achieving protective levels, evaluate spatial and temporal trends, and identify areas where more focused remedial efforts may be warranted. During the summer of 2006, BES collected 78 surface sediment samples for analysis of contaminants of interest (COI). The sediment samples were analyzed for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals, and pesticides. The first broad-scale sampling event was conducted in 1994. These data were comprised of sediment samples from 10 segments/reaches throughout the slough. The 2006 samples consisted of 78 sediment samples from the same reaches. In the 2006 sediment data, metals and PAHs were nearly always detected, pesticides ranged widely in percent detection, and many PCB Aroclors were never detected in any sample while others were detected infrequently.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefits of Three Columbia Slough Restoration Projects on The
    1 The Benefits of Three Columbia Slough Restoration Projects on the Natural and Urban Environment. Chris Brown, Arielle Glade, Mary Head, Joe Miller and Brian Thatcher Abstract: We sampled three different restoration projects; the Whitaker Ponds, the Vanport Wetlands and the Section 1135 Project, to determine what ecological and community benefits restoration is having on the slough and the local community. The Whitaker Ponds, once a junkyard, has been restored to a semi-pristine state and now acts as a community environmental learning center to create awareness of watershed importance. The Vanport wetlands is a young mitigation project that has already shown to aid in wildlife recovery and species diversity. The $4.5 million section 1135 restoration project consists of several components to focus on system restoration. Each of these projects has shown to be successful early on, and a more concerted effort to collect quantitative data will help in steering future projects. Key Words: Columbia River Slough, ecosystem, wetland restoration, urban ecosystems 2 Introduction The Columbia River Slough is a heavily industrialized and highly impacted area located in north Portland, Oregon. Within the past decade the value of its natural state has been realized, and efforts are being made to restore various areas. As land becomes available, the regional Metro government and other government agencies are acquiring lands to use as open space, recreation, and wildlife habitat (personal communication, Jay Mower, CRS watershed council). Currently, there are dozens of restoration projects by various government agencies, non-profit groups and volunteer workers. However, there is no concise relationship between these projects, nor any methodology to measure the projects’ effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Five-Year Review Report for Allied Plating, Inc Superfund Site
    FIFTH FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR ALLIED PLATING, INC. SUPERFUND SITE MULTNOMAH COUNTY, OREGON PREPARED BY U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Seattle, Washington Approved by: Date Ai @f#- Sheryl Bf:/:!;, Director r 1 Office of Environmental Cleanup Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................ 5 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Site Background .................................................................................................................................................... 6 FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM ....................................................................................................... 9 IL RESPONSE ACTION SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 9 Basis for Taking Action ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Response Actions ................................................................................................................................................ 10 Status of hnplementation .................................................................................................................................... 11 Systems Operations/Operation & Maintenance
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Metro Levee System Feasibility Study
    Portland Metro Levee System Feasibility Study Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment Appendix H – Cultural Resources January 2020 Page left blank to facilitate 2-sided copying. Contents Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose Statement ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Study Scope ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Area Description and Background ............................................................................... 10 2.1. Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................... 10 2.2. Environmental History ....................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Precontact Context ............................................................................................................. 20 2.4. Previous Archaeological Investigations ............................................................................. 21 2.5. Archaeological Potential .................................................................................................... 24 2.6. Native Peoples ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C.5 Fish, Wildlife, and Plants
    Appendix C.5 Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Fisheries Technical Memorandum Wildlife Technical Memorandum Vegetation Technical Memorandum Memorandum of No Effects Determination for Federally Listed Threatened and Endangered Species C.5-1 HILLSBORO AIRPORT PARALLEL RUNWAY 12L/30R ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT APPENDIX C.5 Fish Technical Memorandum Administrative Draft Hillsboro Airport Parallel Runway 12L/30R Fisheries Technical Memorandum Prepared for Port of Portland July 2009 Prepared by In association with Summary This technical memorandum describes existing conditions, environmental consequences, and mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts of the Hillsboro Airport Parallel Runway Project 12L/30R on fish and fish habitat. Existing Conditions The Hillsboro Airport (HIO) and other lands in the vicinity owned by the Port of Portland encompass 965 acres. Of this area, 1.59 acres have been designated as stream habitat. This habitat consists of Glencoe Swale, an intermittent tributary of McKay Creek that crosses the north end of HIO. McKay Creek is a tributary to Dairy Creek, which in turn is a tributary to the Tualatin River, which joins the Willamette River at approximately river mile 28.5. At the southeast corner of HIO, a stormwater ditch conveys stormwater to Dawson Creek, which flows to Rock Creek, a tributary of the Tualatin River. McKay and Dairy Creeks provide habitat for several fish species including torrent sculpin (Cottus rhotheus), reticulate sculpin (Cottus perplexus), prickly sculpin (Cottus asper), redside shiner (Richardsonius balteatus), speckled dace (Rinichthys osculus), largescale sucker (Catostomus macrocheilus), rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki), Pacific lamprey (Entosphenus tridentate), Western brook lamprey (Lampetra richardsoni), and crayfish (Leader, 2001).
    [Show full text]