Role of Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins in the Development and Function of Neural Circuits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins in the Development and Function of Neural Circuits CB27CH28-Ghosh ARI 10 September 2011 8:2 Role of Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins in the Development and Function of Neural Circuits Joris de Wit,1,∗ Weizhe Hong,2,∗ Liqun Luo,2 and Anirvan Ghosh1 1Neurobiology Section, Division of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0366; email: [email protected] 2Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5020; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011. 27:697–729 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on axon guidance, target selection, synapse formation, cell adhesion, July 5, 2011 neural connectivity The Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology is online at cellbio.annualreviews.org Abstract This article’s doi: The nervous system consists of an ensemble of billions of neurons in- 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154111 terconnected in a highly specific pattern that allows proper propagation Copyright c 2011 by Annual Reviews. and integration of neural activities. The organization of these specific All rights reserved connections emerges from sequential developmental events including 1081-0706/11/1110-0697$20.00 axon guidance, target selection, and synapse formation. These events Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011.27:697-729. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org ∗These authors contributed equally to this critically rely on cell-cell recognition and communication mediated by manuscript. cell-surface ligands and receptors. Recent studies have uncovered cen- by Stanford University - Main Campus Robert Crown Law Library on 11/06/11. For personal use only. tral roles for leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain-containing proteins, not only in organizing neural connectivity from axon guidance to tar- get selection to synapse formation, but also in various nervous system disorders. Their versatile LRR domains, in particular, serve as key sites for interactions with a wide diversity of binding partners. Here, we fo- cus on a few exquisite examples of secreted or membrane-associated LRR proteins in Drosophila and mammals and review the mechanisms by which they regulate diverse aspects of nervous system development and function. 697 CB27CH28-Ghosh ARI 10 September 2011 8:2 INTRODUCTION Contents Assembling a functional nervous system re- INTRODUCTION.................. 698 quires connecting neurons into circuits with ex- THE LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT . 698 traordinary precision. To accomplish this spe- LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT cific connectivity, axons and dendrites must PROTEINS IN NEURAL navigate toward their target regions, identify DEVELOPMENT................ 702 their appropriate target cells, and form synap- AXON GUIDANCE AND tic contacts with these cells. Along their trajec- DENDRITE ARBORIZATION . 702 tory toward their synaptic targets, neurites are Slit and Robo Regulate Axon guided by an array of secreted and membrane- Midline Crossing . 702 bound factors that help them navigate the com- Slit and Robo Regulate Axon plex extracellular environment and establish TractPositioning............... 705 contacts with other cells. Among the factors Slit and Robo Regulate Dendritic regulating the development of neural circuits, Arborization.................... 705 proteins containing extracellular leucine-rich Trk Receptors Regulate Axon repeat (LRR) domains have recently emerged Guidance . 706 as key organizers of connectivity. The LRR is TARGET SELECTION . 707 a protein-interaction motif that regulates axon Slit Controls Global Directional guidance, target selection, synapse formation, Targeting...................... 707 and stabilization of connections. In addition, re- Capricious Regulates Discrete cent work implicates LRR proteins in disorders Targeting...................... 708 of the nervous system. Other Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins In this review, we highlight recent advances Involved in Target Selection. 710 in our understanding of the role of LRR pro- SYNAPSE FORMATION teins in the development, function, and disor- ANDFUNCTION................ 711 ders of neural circuits. We focus on secreted SALMs, NGLs, and LRRTMs and membrane-associated LRR proteins with Regulate Synapse Formation LRRs in their extracellular domain (listed in inVertebrates.................. 711 Table 1 and Figure 1). We have limited the LGI1 Regulates Synapse Function . 715 discussion to the fly and mammalian nervous MYELINATION..................... 716 systems because most of the experimental work LIMITING STRUCTURAL on the function of extracellular LRR (eLRR) PLASTICITY IN THE ADULT proteins has been done in these two model CENTRAL NERVOUS systems. SYSTEM.......................... 718 Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011.27:697-729. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEINS AND DISORDERS THE LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT by Stanford University - Main Campus Robert Crown Law Library on 11/06/11. For personal use only. OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM . 719 The LRR, one of the most common protein Slitrks in Tourette’s Syndrome and domain repeats across species (Bjorklund et al. Obsessive-Compulsive 2006), is a structural motif of 20 to 30 amino Disorder....................... 719 acids in length. The N-terminal part of the LGI1 in Epilepsy . 719 repeat consists of a conserved 11-residue se- NgR in Schizophrenia. 720 quence rich in leucines at defined positions Other Leucine-Rich Repeat Proteins (LxxLxLxxNxL, where x is any amino acid), al- in Nervous System Disorders . 720 though the leucine and asparagine residues can CONCLUDINGREMARKS......... 721 be substituted with other hydrophobic residues. This part of the motif forms a β-strand and a 698 de Wit et al. CB27CH28-Ghosh ARI 10 September 2011 8:2 Table 1 Leucine-rich repeat (LRR) proteins covered in this reviewa Membrane LRRb proteins topology Aspects of neural circuit development Binding partner Slit, Slit1-3 Secreted Axon guidance, dendrite arborization, target Robo receptors selection TrkA, TrkB, TrkC Transmembrane Axon guidance, neuronal survival, synapse Neurotrophins (NGF, NT3, NT4, formation BDNF), RPTPσ (TrkC) Linx/Islr2 Transmembrane Axon guidance TrkA, Ret Capricious Transmembrane Target selection Unknown Tartan Transmembrane Target selection Unknown Connectin GPI anchored Target selection Self Toll Transmembrane Target selection Spatzle NGL1, 2, 3 Transmembrane Synapse formation Netrin-G1, -G2 (NGL1, 2, respect- ively), LAR family RPTPs (NGL3) LRRTM1, 2, 3 Transmembrane Synapse formation, synapse function, nervous α-andβ-neurexins (-S4) system disorders (LRRTM1, 2) SALM2, 3, 5 Transmembrane Synapse formation Unknown LGI1 Secreted Synapse function, nervous system disorders ADAM22 LGI4 Secreted Myelination (PNS) ADAM22 LINGO-1 Transmembrane Myelination (CNS) Unknown NgR1 GPI anchored Limiting plasticity, nervous system disorders Nogo, MAG, OMgp OMgp GPI anchored Limiting plasticity NgR1 Slitrk1, 2 Transmembrane Nervous system disorders Unknown LRRN3 Transmembrane Nervous system disorders Unknown Tlr4 Transmembrane Nervous system disorders Pathogen-associated molecular patterns aRed: Drosophila LRR proteins; blue: mammalian LRR proteins. bAbbreviations: ADAM22, a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 22; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CNS, central nervous system; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; LAR, leukocyte common antigen-related; LGI, leucine-rich glioma inactivated; LINGO-1, LRR and Ig domain containing, Nogo-receptor-interacting protein 1; LRRN, LRR neuronal; LRRTM, LRR transmembrane; MAG, myelin-associated glycoprotein; NGF, nerve growth factor; NGL, netrin-G ligand; NT, neurotrophin; OMgp, oligodendrocyte-myelin glycoprotein; NgR, Nogo receptor; PNS, peripheral nervous system; RPTP, receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase; SALM, synaptic adhesion-like molecule; Slitrk, Slit and Trk-like; Tlr, Toll-like receptor. loop region that connects with the C-terminal each repeat contributes a β-strand. This is a part of the repeat, which is more variable in defining feature of all LRR domains. The con- Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011.27:697-729. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org sequence and structure (Kajava 1998; Kobe & vex side of ribonuclease inhibitor consists of Deisenhofer 1994, 1995a) (Figure 2a). Indi- α-helices, but composition can vary substan- by Stanford University - Main Campus Robert Crown Law Library on 11/06/11. For personal use only. vidual LRRs are arrayed in tandems of two tially in other LRR proteins (Bella et al. 2008). or more repeats that together constitute the The curved structure of the LRR domain and LRR domain. The first crystal structure of a the exposed β-sheet on the concave side form protein consisting entirely of LRRs, ribonucle- a large binding surface, which makes the LRR ase inhibitor, revealed that this arrangement in domain a very effective protein-binding motif multiple repeats results in a curved, horseshoe- (Kobe & Kajava 2001). The crystal structure shaped structure (Kobe & Deisenhofer 1993) of ribonuclease inhibitor in complex with its (Figure 2b). The concave side of this structure ligand RNase A first demonstrated that globular is made up of a continuous β-sheet, to which ligands can fit in the concave space formed by www.annualreviews.org • LRR Proteins in Neural Development 699 CB27CH28-Ghosh ARI 10 September 2011 8:2 a Axon guidance b Target selection c Synapse formation 3-4 Conn LGI1 3–4 NGL1 LRRTM1 SALM2 TrkA Linx/Islr2 Caps NGL2 LRRTM2 SALM3 TrkB Trn Toll NGL3 SALM5 TrkC 3–4 d Myelination e Limiting f Nervous system disorders e plasticity 9–10 1–3 10–11 Slit Slit-1 Slit-2 Slit-3 LGI4 NgR1
Recommended publications
  • An Integrative Prognostic and Immune Analysis of PTPRD in Pan-Cancer
    An Integrative Prognostic and Immune Analysis of PTPRD in Pan-Cancer Chunpei Ou longhua district central hospital Qin Peng longhua district central hospital Changchun Zeng ( [email protected] ) longhua district central hospital, guangdong medical university https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489- 0627 Research Article Keywords: PTPRD, pan-cancer, prognosis, tumor-inltrating, immunotherapy Posted Date: June 4th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-569409/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/22 Abstract Background: PTPRD plays an indispensable role in the occurrence of multiple tumors. However, pan- cancer analysis is unavailable. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between PTPRD and immunity and describe its prognostic landscape across various tumors. Methods: We explored expression prole, survival analysis, and genomic alterations of PTPRD based on the TIMER, GEPIA, UALCAN, PrognoScan, and cBioPortal database. The frequency of PTPRD mutation and its correlation with response to immunotherapy were evaluated using the cBioPortal database. The relationship between PTPRD and immune-cell inltration was analyzed by the TIMER and TISIDB databases. A protein interaction network was constructed by the STRING database. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis was executed by the Metascape database. Results: A signicant correlation between PTPRD expression and prognosis was found in various cancers. Aberrant PRPRD expression was closely related to immune inltration. Importantly, the patients who harbored PTPRD mutation and received immune checkpoint inhibitors had worse overall survival, especially in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, and had a higher TMB score.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 2. Functional Classification of Genes Differentially Regulated After HOXB4 Inactivation in HSC/Hpcs
    Table 2. Functional classification of genes differentially regulated after HOXB4 inactivation in HSC/HPCs Symbol Gene description Fold-change (mean ± SD) Signal transduction Adam8 A disintegrin and metalloprotease domain 8 1.91 ± 0.51 Arl4 ADP-ribosylation factor-like 4 - 1.80 ± 0.40 Dusp6 Dual specificity phosphatase 6 (Mkp3) - 2.30 ± 0.46 Ksr1 Kinase suppressor of ras 1 1.92 ± 0.42 Lyst Lysosomal trafficking regulator 1.89 ± 0.34 Mapk1ip1 Mitogen activated protein kinase 1 interacting protein 1 1.84 ± 0.22 Narf* Nuclear prelamin A recognition factor 2.12 ± 0.04 Plekha2 Pleckstrin homology domain-containing. family A. (phosphoinosite 2.15 ± 0.22 binding specific) member 2 Ptp4a2 Protein tyrosine phosphatase 4a2 - 2.04 ± 0.94 Rasa2* RAS p21 activator protein 2 - 2.80 ± 0.13 Rassf4 RAS association (RalGDS/AF-6) domain family 4 3.44 ± 2.56 Rgs18 Regulator of G-protein signaling - 1.93 ± 0.57 Rrad Ras-related associated with diabetes 1.81 ± 0.73 Sh3kbp1 SH3 domain kinase bindings protein 1 - 2.19 ± 0.53 Senp2 SUMO/sentrin specific protease 2 - 1.97 ± 0.49 Socs2 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 - 2.82 ± 0.85 Socs5 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 5 2.13 ± 0.08 Socs6 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 6 - 2.18 ± 0.38 Spry1 Sprouty 1 - 2.69 ± 0.19 Sos1 Son of sevenless homolog 1 (Drosophila) 2.16 ± 0.71 Ywhag 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5- monooxygenase activation protein. - 2.37 ± 1.42 gamma polypeptide Zfyve21 Zinc finger. FYVE domain containing 21 1.93 ± 0.57 Ligands and receptors Bambi BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor - 2.94 ± 0.62
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Biomolecular Structure Class II Trna-Synthetases and Trna
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Luthey-Schulten Group Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group Evolution of Biomolecular Structure Class II tRNA-Synthetases and tRNA MultiSeq Developers: Prof. Zan Luthey-Schulten Elijah Roberts Patrick O’Donoghue John Eargle Anurag Sethi Dan Wright Brijeet Dhaliwal September 25, 2006. A current version of this tutorial is available at http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/˜schulten/tutorials/evolution/ CONTENTS 2 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 The MultiSeq Bioinformatic Analysis Environment . 4 1.2 Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases: Role in translation . 4 1.3 Getting Started . 7 1.3.1 Requirements . 7 1.3.2 Copying the tutorial files . 7 1.3.3 Configuring MultiSeq . 7 1.3.4 Configuring BLAST for MultiSeq . 10 1.4 The Aspartyl-tRNA Synthetase/tRNA Complex . 12 1.4.1 Loading the structure into MultiSeq . 12 1.4.2 Selecting and highlighting residues . 13 1.4.3 Domain organization of the synthetase . 14 1.4.4 Nearest neighbor contacts . 14 2 Evolutionary Analysis of AARS Structures 17 2.1 Loading Molecules . 17 2.2 Multiple Structure Alignments . 18 2.3 Structural Conservation Measure: Qres . 19 2.4 Structure Based Phylogenetic Analysis . 21 2.4.1 Limitations of sequence data . 21 2.4.2 Structural metrics look further back in time . 23 3 Complete Evolutionary Profile of AspRS 26 3.1 BLASTing Sequence Databases . 26 3.1.1 Importing the archaeal sequences . 26 3.1.2 Now the other domains of life . 27 3.2 Organizing Your Data . 28 3.3 Finding a Structural Domain in a Sequence . 29 3.4 Aligning to a Structural Profile using ClustalW .
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Correlates of Relationship QTL Involved in Fore- Versus Hind Limb Divergence in Mice
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Biology: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 2013 Genomic Correlates of Relationship QTL Involved in Fore- Versus Hind Limb Divergence in Mice Mihaela Palicev Gunter P. Wagner James P. Noonan Benedikt Hallgrimsson James M. Cheverud Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/biology_facpubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Palicev, M, GP Wagner, JP Noonan, B Hallgrimsson, and JM Cheverud. "Genomic Correlates of Relationship QTL Involved in Fore- Versus Hind Limb Divergence in Mice." Genome Biology and Evolution 5(10), 2013. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © Palicev et al., 2013. GBE Genomic Correlates of Relationship QTL Involved in Fore- versus Hind Limb Divergence in Mice Mihaela Pavlicev1,2,*, Gu¨ nter P. Wagner3, James P. Noonan4, Benedikt Hallgrı´msson5,and James M. Cheverud6 1Konrad Lorenz Institute for Evolution and Cognition Research, Altenberg, Austria 2Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children‘s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 3Yale Systems Biology Institute and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University 4Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine 5Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health and the Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada 6Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • A Conserved Gene Family Encodes Transmembrane Proteins with Fibronectin, Immunoglobulin and Leucine-Rich Repeat Domains (FIGLER) Delicia L
    A conserved gene family encodes transmembrane proteins with fibronectin, immunoglobulin and leucine-rich repeat domains (FIGLER) Delicia L. Munfus, University of Alabama at Birmingham Christopher L. Haga, University of Alabama at Birmingham Peter D. Burrows, University of Alabama at Birmingham Max Cooper, Emory University Journal Title: BMC Biology Volume: Volume 5, Number 1 Publisher: BioMed Central | 2007-09-13, Pages 36-36 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-36 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/rqdhh Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-5-36 Copyright information: © 2007 Munfus et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/). Accessed October 6, 2021 6:19 AM EDT BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access A conserved gene family encodes transmembrane proteins with fibronectin, immunoglobulin and leucine-rich repeat domains (FIGLER) Delicia L Munfus†1,2, Christopher L Haga†1,2, Peter D Burrows1,2,3 and Max D Cooper*1,2,4,5 Address: 1Division of Developmental and Clinical Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300, USA, 2Department of Microbiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300, USA, 3Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300,, 4Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham,
    [Show full text]
  • Cloning and Functional Studies of a Novel Gene Aberrantly Expressed in RB-Deficient Embryos
    Developmental Biology 207, 62–75 (1999) Article ID dbio.1998.9141, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cloning and Functional Studies of a Novel Gene Aberrantly Expressed in RB-Deficient Embryos Shyng-Shiou F. Yuan,* Laura A. Cox,*,1 Gopal K. Dasika,* and Eva Y.-H. P. Lee*,2 *Department of Molecular Medicine/Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78245 The tumor suppressor RB regulates diverse cellular processes such as G1/S transition, cell differentiation, and cell survival. Indeed, Rb-knockout mice exhibit phenotypes including ectopic mitosis, defective differentiation, and extensive apoptosis in the neurons. Using differential display, a novel gene, Rig-1, was isolated based on its elevated expression in the hindbrain and spinal cord of Rb-knockout embryos. The longest open reading frame of Rig-1 encoded a polypeptide that consists of a putative extracellular segment with five immunoglobulin-like domains and three fibronectin III-like domains, a putative transmembrane domain, and a distinct intracellular segment. The Rig-1 sequence was 40% identical to the recently identified roundabout protein. Consistent with the predicted transmembrane nature of the protein, Rig-1 protein was present in the membranous fraction. Antisera raised against the putative extracellular and intracellular segments of Rig-1 reacted with an ;210-kDa protein in mouse embryonic CNS. Rig-1 mRNA was transiently expressed in the embryonic hindbrain and spinal cord. Elevated levels of Rig-1 mRNA and protein were found in Rb2/2 embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of the Protein Domain Universe
    The architecture of the protein domain universe Nikolay V. Dokholyan Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 ABSTRACT Understanding the design of the universe of protein structures may provide insights into protein evolution. We study the architecture of the protein domain universe, which has been found to poses peculiar scale-free properties (Dokholyan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 14132-14136 (2002)). We examine the origin of these scale-free properties of the graph of protein domain structures (PDUG) and determine that that the PDUG is not modular, i.e. it does not consist of modules with uniform properties. Instead, we find the PDUG to be self-similar at all scales. We further characterize the PDUG architecture by studying the properties of the hub nodes that are responsible for the scale-free connectivity of the PDUG. We introduce a measure of the betweenness centrality of protein domains in the PDUG and find a power-law distribution of the betweenness centrality values. The scale-free distribution of hubs in the protein universe suggests that a set of specific statistical mechanics models, such as the self-organized criticality model, can potentially identify the principal driving forces of molecular evolution. We also find a gatekeeper protein domain, removal of which partitions the largest cluster into two large sub- clusters. We suggest that the loss of such gatekeeper protein domains in the course of evolution is responsible for the creation of new fold families. INTRODUCTION The principles of molecular evolution remain elusive despite fundamental breakthroughs on the theoretical front 1-5 and a growing amount of genomic and proteomic data, over 23,000 solved protein structures 6 and protein functional annotations 7-9.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing-Associated Changes in DNA Methylation in X and Y Chromosomes
    Kananen and Marttila Epigenetics & Chromatin (2021) 14:33 Epigenetics & Chromatin https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-021-00407-6 RESEARCH Open Access Ageing-associated changes in DNA methylation in X and Y chromosomes Laura Kananen1,2,3,4* and Saara Marttila4,5* Abstract Background: Ageing displays clear sexual dimorphism, evident in both morbidity and mortality. Ageing is also asso- ciated with changes in DNA methylation, but very little focus has been on the sex chromosomes, potential biological contributors to the observed sexual dimorphism. Here, we sought to identify DNA methylation changes associated with ageing in the Y and X chromosomes, by utilizing datasets available in data repositories, comprising in total of 1240 males and 1191 females, aged 14–92 years. Results: In total, we identifed 46 age-associated CpG sites in the male Y, 1327 age-associated CpG sites in the male X, and 325 age-associated CpG sites in the female X. The X chromosomal age-associated CpGs showed signifcant overlap between females and males, with 122 CpGs identifed as age-associated in both sexes. Age-associated X chro- mosomal CpGs in both sexes were enriched in CpG islands and depleted from gene bodies and showed no strong trend towards hypermethylation nor hypomethylation. In contrast, the Y chromosomal age-associated CpGs were enriched in gene bodies, and showed a clear trend towards hypermethylation with age. Conclusions: Signifcant overlap in X chromosomal age-associated CpGs identifed in males and females and their shared features suggest that despite the uneven chromosomal dosage, diferences in ageing-associated DNA methylation changes in the X chromosome are unlikely to be a major contributor of sex dimorphism in ageing.
    [Show full text]
  • Documentation and Localization of Force-Mediated Filamin a Domain
    ARTICLE Received 29 May 2014 | Accepted 10 Jul 2014 | Published 14 Aug 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5656 Documentation and localization of force-mediated filamin A domain perturbations in moving cells Fumihiko Nakamura1, Mia Song1, John H. Hartwig1 & Thomas P. Stossel1 Endogenously and externally generated mechanical forces influence diverse cellular activities, a phenomenon defined as mechanotransduction. Deformation of protein domains by application of stress, previously documented to alter macromolecular interactions in vitro, could mediate these effects. We engineered a photon-emitting system responsive to unfolding of two repeat domains of the actin filament (F-actin) crosslinker protein filamin A (FLNA) that binds multiple partners involved in cell signalling reactions and validated the system using F-actin networks subjected to myosin-based contraction. Expressed in cultured cells, the sensor-containing FLNA construct reproducibly reported FLNA domain unfolding strikingly localized to dynamic, actively protruding, leading cell edges. The unfolding signal depends upon coherence of F-actin-FLNA networks and is enhanced by stimulating cell contractility. The results establish protein domain distortion as a bona fide mechanism for mechanotransduction in vivo. 1 Translational Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02445, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to F.N. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:4656 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5656
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid-Targeting Pleckstrin Homology Domain Turns Its Autoinhibitory Face Toward the TEC Kinases
    Lipid-targeting pleckstrin homology domain turns its autoinhibitory face toward the TEC kinases Neha Amatyaa, Thomas E. Walesb, Annie Kwonc, Wayland Yeungc, Raji E. Josepha, D. Bruce Fultona, Natarajan Kannanc, John R. Engenb, and Amy H. Andreottia,1 aRoy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011; bDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115; and cInstitute of Bioinformatics and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 Edited by Natalie G. Ahn, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, and approved September 17, 2019 (received for review May 3, 2019) The pleckstrin homology (PH) domain is well known for its phos- activation loop phosphorylation site are also controlled by noncatalytic pholipid targeting function. The PH-TEC homology (PHTH) domain domains (17). In addition to the N-terminal PHTH domain, the within the TEC family of tyrosine kinases is also a crucial component TEC kinases contain a proline-rich region (PRR) and Src ho- of the autoinhibitory apparatus. The autoinhibitory surface on the mology 3 (SH3) and Src homology 2 (SH2) domains that impinge PHTH domain has been previously defined, and biochemical investi- on the kinase domain to alter the conformational ensemble and gations have shown that PHTH-mediated inhibition is mutually thus the activation status of the enzyme. A crystal structure of the exclusive with phosphatidylinositol binding. Here we use hydrogen/ BTK SH3-SH2-kinase fragment has been solved (10) showing that deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance the SH3 and SH2 domains of BTK assemble onto the distal side of (NMR), and evolutionary sequence comparisons to map where and the kinase domain (the surface opposite the activation loop), how the PHTH domain affects the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) stabilizing the autoinhibited form of the kinase in a manner similar domain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cell Surface Interaction Network of Neural Leucine-Rich Repeat Receptors Christian Söllner*† and Gavin J Wright*
    Open Access Research2009SöllnerVolume and 10, IssueWright 9, Article R99 A cell surface interaction network of neural leucine-rich repeat receptors Christian Söllner*† and Gavin J Wright* Addresses: *Cell Surface Signalling Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1HH, UK. †Current address: Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Department 3 (Genetics), Spemannstraße 35, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. Correspondence: Christian Söllner. Email: [email protected]. Gavin J Wright. Email: [email protected] Published: 18 September 2009 Received: 9 June 2009 Revised: 18 August 2009 Genome Biology 2009, 10:R99 (doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-9-r99) Accepted: 18 September 2009 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at http://genomebiology.com/2009/10/9/R99 © 2009 Söllner and Wright; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. An<p>A extracellular network of neuroreceptor Zebrafish extracellular interaction neuroreceptor network interactions are revealed using AVEXIS, a highly stringent interaction assay.</p> Abstract Background: The vast number of precise intercellular connections within vertebrate nervous systems is only partly explained by the comparatively few known extracellular guidance cues. Large families
    [Show full text]