DOCSLIB.ORG

Newsletter April 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Royal Economic Society Issue no. 181 Newsletter April 2018 Spring forward... As so frequently happens, the Spring issue of this Correspondence Newsletter coincides with the Society’s Annual Letter from America p.3 Conference. A report on the Conference itself inevitably, therefore has to wait for the July issue. But some of April’s content, notably the Secretary- General’s Annual Report, emanates from the Features Conference and it is only by the heroic efforts of all concerned that copy meets the printer’s deadline. The challenge of algorithmic economics p.4 The Report is particularly interesting this year (and Secretary-General’s Annual Report p.7 needs to be read in conjunction with ‘RES office news’) for the account it gives of new , additional, Economic Journal, editors’ Annual Report p.11 appointments to the Society’s payroll. It describes Bennett Institute for Public Policy p.15 what is, in effect, the ‘professionalisation’ of the Society — or at least of its administration. Econometrics Journal, editor’s Annual Report p.16 Fortunately, as Sue Holloway showed in the Treasurer’s Annual Report the Society is in a finan- cial position which has been strong for some years Obituaries and likely to strengthen in the immediate future. Elizabeth Serson Johnson p.21 The Treasurer’s Report is another product of the Annual Conference. It has not traditionally been Anthony Brewer p.21 published in the Newsletter but it is an important and interesting document and one might argue that a version at least should appear in these pages, in Comment addition to the Society’s website. Views are invited. The depreciation of sterling That said, fitting it into the April issue might be a - from Giles Keating p.23 problem given the new practice, anticipated in our January issue, of moving the Reports from the edi- tors of our two principal journals from January to April. The effect is to make this issue ‘report- RES office news p. 24 heavy’, with a corresponding reduction in space for more spontaneous contributions. Fortunately, Angus’s Letter from America meets his usual Conference diary p. 25 excellent standard and we have two interesting pieces by Paul Ormerod and Giles Keating. All three give cause for thought in their different ways. Royal Economic Society Economic Royal THE ROYAL ECONOMIC SOCIETY • President: Professor Lord Nicholas Stern (LSE) • President-elect: Professor Rachel Griffith (University of Manchester and IFS) • Past-president: Professor Peter Neary (Oxford) • Secretary-General: Professor Denise Osborn (University of Manchester) • Second Secretary: Professor Robin Naylor (University of Warwick) For other members of the Executive Committee, go to the Society pages on the website where all those involved in the structure and governance of the Society are listed. The Society’s The Royal Economic Society is one of the oldest and most prestigious econom- ic associations in the world. It is a learned society, founded in 1890 with the Newsletter aim ‘to promote the study of economic science.’ Initially called the British Economic Association, it became the Royal Economic Society on receiv- The Newsletter is first and fore- ing its Royal Charter in 1902. The current officers of the Executive most a vehicle for the dissemination Committee are listed above. of news and comment of interest to its readers. Contributions from readers are The Society’s bee logo always warmly welcomed. We are partic- The Society’s logo, shown below, has been used from its earli- ularly interested to receive letters, reports est days. The story behind the use of the bee refers to the of conferences and meetings, and news of ‘Fable of the Bees’ by Bernard Mandeville, an 18th Century major research projects as well as comment essayist which alludes to the benefits of decentralisation on recent events. by looking at co-operation amongst bees and showing how the pursuit of self-interest can be beneficial to Visit our website at: society. The Latin quote comes from Virgil and www.res.org.uk/view/resNewsletter.html speaks of the drive of bees. The Newsletter is published quarterly in January, April, July and October Newsletter - subscription rates The Newsletter is distributed to members of the Society free of charge. Non-members may obtain copies at the following subscription rates: • UK £5.00 • Europe (outside UK) £6.50 For membership benefits, sub- • Non-Europe (by airmail) £8.00 scription fees and how to join the Society, see back Next issue No. 182 July 2018 cover or go to: Deadline for submissions 16 June 2018 www.res.org.uk Editor RES Office Prof Peter Howells, Chief Executive: Leighton Chipperfield Bristol Business School, Operations Manager: Marie-Luiza De Menezes UWE Bristol, RES Office, 2 Dean Trench Street, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY Westminster, London. SW1P 3HE Email: [email protected] [email protected] Tel: 020 3137 6301 Email: [email protected] Website: www.res.org.uk Designed by Sarum Editorial Services: www.sarum-editorial.co.uk www.res.org.uk/view/resNewsletter.html 2 Correspondence Letter from America — On blood, immigrants, and intellectuals Angus contrasts current attitudes in the USA towards intellectuals and immigrants with those of the founding fathers. MERICA CAN SEEM very strange to foreigners. the Nobel visit to the White House did not take place, When I first set foot in New Jersey with my fam- perhaps by mutual agreement, given that several laure- Aily in the summer of 1979, I somehow imagined ates were no keener to meet the President than was the that the place was infested with gangsters. Not from The President to meet them. And after all, what could Trump Sopranos, which then lay far in the future, but more like- possibly learn from Richard Thaler, who works, among ly from reading Tintin in America to my kids, or from other things, on self-control? versions of the Al Capone story in the Reader’s Digest that, as a child in Scotland, had badly scared me. We vis- One immigration measure on the table is the RAISE Act, ited a hamburger place — in those days hamburgers proposed in the Senate by Tom Cotton and David Perdue, were thought to be healthy, and compared with the and supported by President Trump. It aims to cut immi- British versions of the 70s, probably were — and as I gration by half, and would subject potential immigrants carried my tray to a table, there was a loud pop. I looked to a test to select only those whose skills are thought by up, and a man across the room had his hands over his the sponsors to benefit the country. The New York Times face, with gore oozing between his fingers. Just as I had published a version of the test, on which 30 points were supposed. needed to qualify. I scored 31, just scraping by. The deci- sive factor for me was not my Cambridge BA, which did Universities held in low repute not count, but my high income, which I should not have Today, America is probably more famous for the ram- had had I not been already in the US. Then I noticed a pant anti-intellectualism of its administration than for a footnote. A Nobel Prize counts 30 bonus points — elevat- relatively quiescent Mafia. We are terrorized more by ing me to 61 — but not just any Nobel Prize. It must be populists than by gangsters, and populists seem to hate in a STEM subject. Peace and literature are apparently immigrants and intellectuals in equal measure. President not useful in today’s United States. I was surprised only Trump is an ardent (and apparently genuine) mercan- that economics did count. Mercantilism, anyone? tilist, and if he had a science advisor — which he has not What would John Winthrop have thought? managed to get around to selecting — he or she would Yet there is another side. The Puritans who started the likely recommend leeches or alchemy. The tax bill Massachusetts Bay colony greatly valued learning, and passed in December not only redistributes from poor to founded Harvard within a few years of their arrival. rich, but also imposed a tax on university endowments, Richard Hofstadter in his history of anti-intellectualism and, in an early version, proposed to tax as salaries the in America quotes Moses Coit Tyler ‘Only six years after tuition relief that graduate students nominally receive as John Winthrop’s arrival in Salem harbor, the people of an accounting counterpart for the teaching they must do. Massachusetts took from their own treasury the fund Universities are generally unpopular, with 58 percent of from which to found a university; so that while the tree- Republicans saying that colleges and universities have a stumps were as yet scarcely weather-browned in their negative effect on the way things are going in the coun- earliest harvest fields, and before the nightly howl of the try. Only 28 percent of Democrats agree, but taken wolf had ceased from the outskirts of their villages, they together, the numbers are not encouraging. had made arrangements by which even in that wilderness Even the UK is suspect their young men could at once enter upon the study of Aristotle and Thucydides, of Horace and Tacitus and the Immigrants are seen even less favorably than intellectu- Hebrew Bible.’ Shortly thereafter, Oxford and als, especially if they come from Muslim majority or ter- Cambridge recognized Harvard’s degrees as equivalent ror prone countries. In 2015, one of my fellow Nobel to their own. Of course, Trump is no Puritan. Laureates was Aziz Ancar, who was born in Turkey, another, Bill Campbell, was born in Ireland.
Recommended publications
  • Vehicle (W Co "'4 Public Disclosure Authorized 9952 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

    Vehicle (W Co "'4 Public Disclosure Authorized 9952 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized

    THE HIGHWAY DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE STANDARDS SERIES Vehicle (w Co "'4 Public Disclosure Authorized 9952 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized , .0.. * ... ..... ... Public Disclosure Authorized AWorld Bank Publication I I I I I THE HIGHWAY DESIGN AND MAINTENANCE STANDARDS SERIES Vehicle Operating Costs Evidence from Developing Countries Andrew Chesher and Robert Harrison Publishedfor The WorldBank The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London © 1987 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America The Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, Maryland 21211 First printing December 1987 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this study are the results of research supported by the World Bank, but they are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organizations, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-PublicationData Chesher, Andrew, 1948- Vehicle Operating Costs: evidence from developing countries by Andrew Chesher and Robert Harrison. p. cm. - (The Highway design and maintenance standards series) Bibliography:p. 1. Motor vehicles-Developing countries-Cost of operation. I. Harrison, Robert, 1943- . II. Title. III. Series. TL151.5.C48 1987 361.6'1'072-dcl9 87-22178 ISBN 0-8018-3588-7 Foreword An effective road transportation network is an important factor in economic and social development. It is also costly. Road construction and maintenance consume a large proportion of the national budget, while the costs borne by the road-using public for vehicle operation and depreciation are even greater.
  • Worldwide Econometrics Rankings: 1989-2005

    Worldwide Econometrics Rankings: 1989-2005

    Syracuse University SURFACE Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Center for Policy Research Affairs 2007 Worldwide Econometrics Rankings: 1989-2005 Badi H. Baltagi Syracuse University. Center for Policy Research, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/cpr Part of the Econometrics Commons Recommended Citation Baltagi, Badi H., "Worldwide Econometrics Rankings: 1989-2005" (2007). Center for Policy Research. 71. https://surface.syr.edu/cpr/71 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Policy Research by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSN: 1525-3066 Center for Policy Research Working Paper No. 94 WORLDWIDE ECONOMETRICS RANKINGS: 1989-2005 Badi H. Baltagi Center for Policy Research Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs Syracuse University 426 Eggers Hall Syracuse, New York 13244-1020 (315) 443-3114 | Fax (315) 443-1081 e-mail: [email protected] May 2007 $5.00 Up-to-date information about CPR’s research projects and other activities is available from our World Wide Web site at www-cpr.maxwell.syr.edu. All recent working papers and Policy Briefs can be read and/or printed from there as well. CENTER FOR POLICY RESEARCH – Spring 2007 Timothy Smeeding, Director Professor of Economics & Public Administration __________ Associate Directors Margaret Austin Associate Director Budget and Administration Douglas Wolf John Yinger Professor of Public Administration Professor of Economics and Public Administration Associate Director, Aging Studies Program Associate Director, Metropolitan Studies Program SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES Badi Baltagi...........................................
  • Is Published Semi-Annually by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-040

    Is Published Semi-Annually by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-040

    JOURNAL ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS & HIGH TECHNOLOGY LAW is published semi-annually by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401 ISSN: 1543-8899 Copyright © 2009 by the Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law an association of students sponsored by the University of Colorado School of Law and the Silicon Flatirons Telecommunications Program. POSTMASTER: Please send address changes to JTHTL, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401 Subscriptions Domestic volume subscriptions are available for $45.00. City of Boulder subscribers please add $3.74 sales tax. Boulder County subscribers outside the City of Boulder please add $2.14 sales tax. Metro Denver subscribers outside of Boulder County please add $1.85 sales tax. Colorado subscribers outside of Metro Denver please add $1.31 sales tax. International volume subscriptions are available for $50.00. Inquiries concerning ongoing subscriptions or obtaining an individual issue should be directed to the attention of JTHTL Managing Editor at [email protected] or by writing JTHTL Managing Editor, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401. Back issues in complete sets, volumes, or single issues may be obtained from: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 1285 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14209. Back issues may also be found in electronic format for all your research needs on HeinOnline http://heinonline.org/. Manuscripts JTHTL invites the submission of unsolicited manuscripts. Please send softcopy manuscripts to the attention of JTHTL Articles Editors at [email protected] in Word or PDF formats or through ExpressO at http://law.bepress.com/expresso. Hardcopy submissions may be sent to JTHTL Articles Editors, Campus Box 401, Boulder, CO 80309-0401.
  • Farmer0606.Pdf

    Farmer0606.Pdf

    8.6 econophysics MH 2/6/06 10:41 AM Page 686 NEWS FEATURE NATURE|Vol 441|8 June 2006 CULTURE CRASH Some economists had hoped that physicists might shake up the rigid theories typical of mainstream economics. But so far, they’re unimpressed by physicists’ handling of the markets. Philip Ball reports. CHINAFOTOPRESS/GETTY or the past two decades, some physi- their statistics. At face value it is a damning It is tempting to interpret this as a mere acad- cists have been trying to apply their indictment, and raises the question of whether emic turf war. But Ormerod and colleagues are ideas and tools to an area that seems a econophysics will ever make a genuine contri- among the few people in economics who have Flong way from traditional physics. They bution to economic theory, or whether it is taken econophysics seriously. Most economists are exploring the notion that there might be a doomed to remain a fringe interest. don’t know the discipline exists — and if they kind of physics of the economy — an ‘econo- did, they would probably heap derision on it. physics’, as it has been dubbed1. Last year, some Claim to blame The idea that physics might have something of these econophysicists even went as far as to Some econophysicists admit that there are useful to contribute to economics arises suggest that economics might be “the next problems. “Econophysics is a field with very because both fields are concerned with systems physical science”2. uneven quality,” says Doyne Farmer, a physi- of many interacting components that obey spe- But now this unlikely marriage is showing cist at the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico, cific rules.
  • Quantum Mechanics Econophysics

    Quantum Mechanics Econophysics

    Quantum Mechanics_Econophysics Econophysics is an interdisciplinary research field, applying theories and methods originally developed by physicists in order to solve problems ineconomics, usually those including uncertainty or stochastic processes andnonlinear dynamics. Its application to the study of financial markets has also been termed statistical finance referring to its roots in statistical physics. History Physicists’ interest in the social sciences is not new; Daniel Bernoulli, as an example, was the originator of utility-based preferences. One of the founders ofneoclassical economic theory, former Yale University Professor of EconomicsIrving Fisher, was originally trained under the renowned Yale physicist, Josiah Willard Gibbs.[1] Likewise, Jan Tinbergen, who won the first Nobel Prize in economics in 1969 for having developed and applied dynamic models for the analysis of economic processes, studied physics with Paul Ehrenfest at Leiden University. Econophysics was started in the mid-1990s by several physicists working in the subfield of statistical mechanics. Unsatisfied with the traditional explanations and approaches of economists - which usually prioritized simplified approaches for the sake of soluble theoretical models over agreement with empirical data - they applied tools and methods from physics, first to try to match financial data sets, and then to explain more general economic phenomena. One driving force behind econophysics arising at this time was the sudden availability of large amounts of financial data, starting in the 1980s. It became apparent that traditional methods of analysis were insufficient - standard economic methods dealt with homogeneous agents and equilibrium, while many of the more interesting phenomena in financial markets fundamentally depended on heterogeneous agents and far-from-equilibrium situations.
  • Andrew Chesher Profile, June 2018 Andrew Chesher Is William Stanley Jevons

    Andrew Chesher Profile, June 2018 Andrew Chesher Is William Stanley Jevons

    Andrew Chesher profile, June 2018 Andrew Chesher is William Stanley Jevons Professor of Economics and Economic Measurement at University College London. Before that, till 1999, he was Professor of Econometrics at the University of Bristol and before that , till 1983, he was Lecturer at the University of Birmingham from which he graduated with a Bachelors degree in 1970. He was awarded the degree of Doctor of Science, Honoris Causa by the University of Birmingham in 2017. He is Honorary Professor at Beihang University in Beijing and Research Fellow at the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Andrew Chesher is Fellow of the British Academy and chaired its Economics and Economic History Section 2009-12. He is Fellow of the Econometric Society and Foreign Honorary Member of the American Economic Association. From 2001 – 2005 he was Chair of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Research Grants Board and a member of ESRC Council. In 2016-2018 he was President, then Past President, of the Royal Economic Society. Andrew Chesher is the founding Director of the Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, a joint venture by University College London and the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Started in 2000 this is now the world’s leading centre for the development and application of methods to deliver understanding of the economic motivations and behaviours of people, households and firms. Andrew Chesher has worked with many international agencies, applying economics to deliver answers to substantive real world problems. His research on the effects of highway conditions on vehicle operating costs in Brazil and India plays a critical role in the World Bank’s Highway Design and Maintenance Models.
  • Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online

    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 19 April 2017 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Ormerod, Paul and Caiado, Camila C. S. (2017) 'Market structure with interacting consumers.', Review of behavioral economics., 4 (1). pp. 33-49. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000057 Publisher's copyright statement: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Review of Behavioral Economics, 2017, 4: 33–49 Market Structure with Interacting Consumers Camila C. S. Caiado1 and Paul Ormerod2 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, UK; [email protected] 2Volterra Partners LLP and University College London, UK; [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Economic theory has developed a typology of markets which de- pends upon the number of firms which are present.
  • Andrew Chesher

    Andrew Chesher

    ANDREW CHESHER CURRICULUM VITAE: November 2018 1. CONTACT: Department of Economics, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT. Telephone : +44 (0) 7768 318224 Email : [email protected] 2. DEGREE: 1967 - 70 University of Birmingham, B.Soc.Sc. Mathematics, Economics & Statistics, 1st Class 3. FULL TIME APPOINTMENTS: 2007 – Director, ESRC Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, CeMMAP 2001 – 2007 Director, Leverhulme Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice 2013 – William Stanley Jevons Professor of Economics and Economic Measurement, University College London 1999 – 2013 Professor of Economics, Department of Economics, University College London 1984 - 99 Professor of Econometrics, Department of Economics, University of Bristol 1996 – 98 Head, Department of Economics, University of Bristol 1987 - 90 Head, Department of Economics, University of Bristol 1971 - 83 Lecturer in Econometrics, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham 1970 - 71 Research Associate, The Acton Society 4. OTHER ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: 2018 Visiting Fellow, Cowles Foundation 2015 Visiting Scholar, Becker Friedman Institute, University of Chicago 2008 Visiting Fellow, Cowles Foundation 1999 – Research Fellow, Institute for Fiscal Studies 1996 - 99 Research Associate, Institute for Fiscal Studies 1993 - 94 University Fellowship, University of Bristol 1993 - 03 Associate Member, Nuffield College, Oxford 1993 Visiting Professor, Louis Pasteur University I, Strasbourg 1992 Visiting Professor, University of Utrecht 1986 Visiting Professor, Tilburg University 1985 - 90 Research Fellow, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London 1984 - 90 Research Fellow, University College, London 1983 Guest Professor, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna 1983 Visiting Professor, University of Florida 1982 - 87 Research Associate, SSRC Programme - Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income, London School of Economics 1981 - 83 Visiting Senior Research Fellow, University of Hull Andrew Chesher - curriculum vitae October 2018 5.
  • Implications of the Euro: a Crtical Perspective from the Left

    Implications of the Euro: a Crtical Perspective from the Left

    Implications of the Euro To date, critical analysis of the Economic and Monetary Union project has largely been advanced from the centre-right spectrum of British politics. Comparable questioning from the centre-left, whilst once a powerful phenomenon, has more recently failed to find a coherent voice. Yet the European fault-line cannot be characterised as a neat left–right issue. There are noticeable divisions in opinion across British business, the trade union movement and within the Labour Party. Implications of the Euro offers a unique insight into this key debate from the ‘centre- left’, eurosceptic viewpoint. This book provides a rigorous analysis of the salient economic and political issues of concern, such as: the economics of a single currency, employment and social implications, in addition to issues of sovereignty and political determination. The arguments presented in this volume highlight the emergence of a coherent alternative to deepening economic integration as a platform to build a just and equitable society. Contributions are drawn from leading academics, trade union leaders and prominent politicians, both from the Labour Party and the wider progressive left in British politics. This informative and thought provoking book will be indispensable reading for students and practitioners in economics, politics and international relations, as well as those interested in this highly contentious topic. Philip Whyman is Reader in Economics at the University of Central Lancashire. Mark Baimbridge and Brian Burkitt are Senior Lecturers
  • Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy Introduction and Essays on New and Changing Paradigms in Socio-Economic Thinking Springer Complexity

    Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy Introduction and Essays on New and Changing Paradigms in Socio-Economic Thinking Springer Complexity

    Understanding Complex Systems Je rey Johnson Andrzej Nowak Paul Ormerod Bridget Rosewell Yi-Cheng Zhang Editors Non-Equilibrium Social Science and Policy Introduction and Essays on New and Changing Paradigms in Socio-Economic Thinking Springer Complexity Springer Complexity is an interdisciplinary program publishing the best research and academic-level teaching on both fundamental and applied aspects of complex systems – cutting across all traditional disciplines of the natural and life sciences, engineering, economics, medicine, neuroscience, social and computer science. Complex Systems are systems that comprise many interacting parts with the ability to generate a new quality of macroscopic collective behavior the manifestations of which are the spontaneous formation of distinctive temporal, spatial or functional structures. Models of such systems can be successfully mapped onto quite diverse “real-life” situations like the climate, the coherent emission of light from lasers, chemical reaction-diffusion systems, biological cellular networks, the dynamics of stock markets and of the internet, earthquake statistics and prediction, freeway traffic, the human brain, or the formation of opinions in social systems, to name just some of the popular applications. Although their scope and methodologies overlap somewhat, one can distinguish the following main concepts and tools: self-organization, nonlinear dynamics, synergetics, turbulence, dynamical systems, catastrophes, instabilities, stochastic processes, chaos, graphs and networks, cellular
  • Research Review

    Research Review

    RESEARCH REVIEW Contents Spring 2015 Recent Discussion Papers Page #262 College Diversity and Investment Incentives 2 Thomas Gall, Patrick Legros, and Andrew F. Newman #263 Weak Ex Ante Collusion and Design of Supervisory Institutions 3 Dilip Mookherjee, Alberto Motta, and Masatoshi Tsumagari #264 Political Decentralization 4 Dilip Mookherjee #265 Equity Short-term Finance under Philip II, with an Option to Long-term Funded Debt 5 Carlos Álvarez-Nogal and Christophe Chamley #266 Indian Labor Regulations and the Cost of Corruption: Evidence from the Firm Size Distribution 6 Amrit Amirapu and Michael Gechter #267 Formal Banking and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Analysis in India 7 Nathaniel Young #268 Generalizing the Results from Social Experiments: Theory and Evidence from Mexico and India 8 Michael Gechter #269 Bureaucrats and Politicians: How Does Electoral Competition Affect Bureaucratic Performance? 9 Anusha Nath #270 Robots Are Us: Some Economics of Human Replacement 10 Seth G. Benzell, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, Guillermo LaGarda, and Jeffrey D. Sachs Research 11 Distinguished Alumni Award 11 Faculty Profiles 12 Seminars 14 Distinguished Visitors 15 Students Activity 15 The Institute for Economic Development (IED) is a research center within Boston University’s Department of Economics focusing on the economic problems of developing countries and related fields of finance, trade, foreign investment, health, education, political economy, economic history and institutions. The Institute for Economic Development at Boston University COLLEGE DIVERSITY AND system. Moral hazard, social norms, and regulations all play a role in limiting the transferability of future income, INVESTMENT INCENTIVES and so colleges remain inefficiently segregated. Absent By: Thomas Gall, Patrick Legros, any policy intervention, segregation will distort incentives; and Andrew F.
  • Credit Constraints and Growth in a Global Economy

    Credit Constraints and Growth in a Global Economy

    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by LSE Research Online Nicolas Coeurdacier, Stéphane Guibaud and Keyu Jin Credit constraints and growth in a global economy Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Coeurdacier, Nicolas, Guibaud, Stéphane and Jin, Keyu (2015) Credit constraints and growth in a global economy. American Economic Review, 105 (9). pp. 2838-2881. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130549 © 2015 The American Economic Review This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62016/ Available in LSE Research Online: October 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Credit Constraints and Growth in a Global Economy Nicolas Coeurdacier St´ephane Guibaud SciencesPo Paris and CEPR London School of Economics Keyu Jin London School of Economics April 30, 2013∗ Abstract We show that in an open-economy OLG model, the interaction between growth differentials and household credit constraints, more severe in fast-growing countries, can explain three prominent global trends: a divergence in private saving rates between advanced and emerging economies, large net capital outflows from the latter, and a sustained decline in the world interest rate.