Curriculum Vitae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
One Cannot Live Only with Differences: Similarities Are Needed Too
BOGDAN BOGDANOV: ONE CANNOT LIVE ONLY WITH DIFFERENCES: SIMILARITIES ARE NEEDED TOO In contemporary Europe the issue is to guarantee many concrete freedoms in many spheres Professor Bogdanov, how did the idea about “Open Society” foundation come about in Bulgaria at the beginning of the 1990s, what support did it get? “Open Society”, like many things that happen in Bulgaria, came into being by chance and was a consequence of accidental factors. People who knew George brought him to Bulgaria. At that time Soros was interested in an open society not only as a social practice but also as a platform to be defended. I think that was very useful. The foundation did not have initial difficulties. Suitable organizers were found, among which the long standing executive director Georgi Prohaski – a highly organized individual with a vision. The governing body of “Open Society” was characterized by a working harmony among many people, whose vision and perseverance led to excellent results. As far as the idea itself goes – ideas do not always match practice. Since I am intellectually inclined, I have always been interested in the concept of the open society, it became part of my way of thinking, it figured in my research. The idea itself as a platform did not become widespread. As it always happens with all ideas, they involve complex matter, which somehow remains undeveloped. Soros’ attitude is a case in point. He published a significant number of books on the open society. As a practically oriented person he gradually ceased to be involved with the idea. -
Albena Georgieva Eng.Pdf
Professor, Doctor of Sciences Albena Georgieva-Angelova Fields of research: typology of oral narratives; functions of folk storytelling; local religious culture, etc. Scientific qualification: philology, folklore studies, cultural anthropology Education: 1969-1973 – Secondary School in English Language, Sofia 1974-1978 – Bulgarian Philology at the Sofia University “St. Climent of Ohrid” 1980-1983 – PhD Student in Bulgarian folklore at Sofia University “St. Climent of Ohrid” 1987 – Educational and scientific degree Doctor (corresponding to PhD) at Sofia University “St. Climent of Ohrid”; dissertation title: “Bulgarian Etiological Legends. Theoretical Problems” 2009 – Doctor of Philological Sciences – dissertation title “Oral Religious Narratives and Local Christian Culture”. University Courses Delivered 1987-1990 – Visiting Professor in Bulgarian Folklore at the South-Western University “Neofit Rilski” in Blagoevgrad 1990-1992 and 1995 – Visiting Professor in Folklore at Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski” 1993 – Visiting Professor for post-graduate specialization in the Department of Culture Studies at Sofia University “St. Climent Ohridski” 1998 – 16 March – 16 April – visiting Professor in Bulgarian Folklore in the Universities of Lódz and Warsaw, Poland Since 2005 – Visiting Professor with various courses concerning Bulgarian Folklore in bachelor’s and master’s programmes at the South-Western University “Neofit Rilski” in Blagoevgrad 2011 – 7-11 March – a 5-lecture course on traditional oral narration in the University of Lódz, -
A Long Speech Instead of a Minute Silence for Professor Bogdan Bogdanov
A LONG SPEECH INSTEAD OF A MINUTE SILENCE FOR PROFESSOR BOGDAN BOGDANOV THE CODE OF IMMORTALITY For one of the anniversaries of the New Bulgarian University the Board of Trustees voted a decision to publish a small booklet which would present everything that makes our University different, innovative, filled with a spirit, thriving and attractive – at that time, like a ‘tiny flower amongst nettles’, which, rather than a long history behind, has eyes for the future. We entitled the book “Why are we different?”. The book turned out well and we concluded it with the following text: “In 100 years we will probably be like Humboldt, Fichte, Schelling, and Schleiermacher, we will resemble Godric Gryffindor, Helga Hufflepuff, Rowena Ravenclaw, we will be eligible to have stone thrones erected in front of our University for us. A few centuries later our differences will appear pathetic, just like the creation of cinema, television, the telephone, the computer appears to people today, but our differences will always carry the feeling of a special world of freedom.” We thus merged the names of the founders of the Humboldt University – great philosophers and university professors, each one - with an undeniable contribution to life and the university idea, with the names of the lecturers at the School of Witchcraft and Wizardry from Harry Potter, setting for ourselves a horizon – from the strictly academic to the magically spiritual, in order to present the colours of our diversity. Today we reached the point of knowing that, indeed, we ARE different and of re- discovering what we have always known – but on a scale longer than ordinary human time. -
ROSEMARY STATELOVA the Seven Sins of Chalga
ROSEMARY STATELOVA The Seven Sins of Chalga Toward an Anthropology of Ethnopop Music Edited and introduced by Angela Rodel PROSVETA SOFIA contents editor’s introduction œOut of One Throat Many VoicesB / 7 introduction What I Study and Why / 11 Why Anthropology? / 17 chapter I Ethnopop Music and Contemporary Bulgaria / 21 Images of Today’s Bulgaria / 23 The Dominant Culture of the Excluded / 30 chapter II Ethnopop Music and the Trauma From the Past / 38 Different but Together / 48 Etude on the Interpretation of a Word / 58 chapter III Basic Aspects of Ethnopop Music: Scientific Approaches and Ideas / 64 Chalga and Orientalism / 66 Ethnopop Music and Regionalism / 72 Chalga as a Cross-cultural Product: The Mixed / 77 Chalga – Eroticism and Vulgarity / 85 Ethnopop Music in Relation to Folklore / 99 Appendix to Chapter III / 112 5 chapter IV Ethnopop Music as Creativity: Two Roma Cases / 117 Neshko Neshev – The Passions of a Music / 118 An Extract From the Story of Neshko Neshev: His Childhood and First Steps in Playing Music / 119 Neshko Today / 122 Biculturality / 124 Evaluative Duality / 126 The Aesthetics of Mixing. Improvising Again / 129 Extracts From Neshko’s Story. Pop Music or Chalga / 132 A Debut at the Fair “Muhabet in B-minor” / 134 An Expert’s Appraisal / 135 The Big Assumption / 136 Extracts From Penka Nesheva’s Story. The Ban and its Lifting / 136 Deceptive Cadence / 140 The Real Finale / 140 Anita Christi: “I Will Leave Something to the World …” Subject, Motives and Goals of the Study / 141 Family Background and Childhood / 143 Bulgarians and Gypsies: Problems of Coexistence / 147 The Professional Life of a Singer. -
Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria Анти-Одиссей: Орфизм И Поздний Комунизм В Болгарии ❦ Miglena Nikolchina
SLAVICA TER 20 SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal VOLUME 20 (2018/I) Literary Theory in Bulgaria SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal ISSN 1592-0291 (print) & 2283-5482 (online) WEB www.slavica-ter.org EMAIL [email protected] PUBLISHED BY Università degli Studi di Trieste Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche, del Linguaggio, dell’Interpretazione e della Traduzione Universität Konstanz Fachbereich Literaturwissenschaft Univerza v Ljubljani Filozofska fakulteta, Oddelek za slavistiko EDITORIAL BOARD Roman Bobryk (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities) Margherita De Michiel (University of Trieste) Tomáš Glanc (University of Zurich) Vladimir Feshchenko (Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences) Kornelija Ičin (University of Belgrade) Miha Javornik (University of Ljubljana) Jurij Murašov (University of Konstanz) Blaž Podlesnik (University of Ljubljana, technical editor) Ivan Verč (University of Trieste) EDITORIAL Antonella D’Amelia (University of Salerno) ADVISORY BOARD Patrizia Deotto (University of Trieste) Nikolaj Jež (University of Ljubljana) Alenka Koron (Institute of Slovenian Literature and Literary Studies) Đurđa Strsoglavec (University of Ljubljana) Tomo Virk (University of Ljubljana) DESIGN & LAYOUT Aljaž Vesel & Anja Delbello / AA Copyright by Authors Contents Literary theory in BuLgaria 10 What is it That is Being Threatened? Introductory Words Что находится под угрозой? Введение в тему ❦ Darin tenev 16 Poststructuralist Backgrounds: the Political Strategies of Resistance in the Literary-Theoretical Debates during the 1960–1970s in Bulgaria Постструктуралистские предпосылки: политические стратегии сопротивления в литературоведческих дебатах в 1960–1970-х годах в Болгарии ❦ enyo Stoyanov 46 Anti-Odysseus: Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria Анти-Одиссей: Орфизм и поздний комунизм в Болгарии ❦ MigLena nikoLchina 70 Authentic and Heterogeneous Mimesis: Reflection and Self-reflexivity in Todor Pavlov and Yuri Lotman Аутентичный и гетерогенный мимесис: отражение и авторефлексивность у Т. -
Anti-Odysseus: Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria Анти-Одиссей: Орфизм И Поздний Комунизм В Болгарии
Anti-Odysseus: Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria Анти-Одиссей: Орфизм и поздний комунизм в Болгарии ❦ Miglena nikolchina ▶ [email protected] SLAVICA TERGESTINA European Slavic Studies Journal ISSN 1592-0291 (print) & 2283-5482 (online) VOLUME 20 (2018/I), pp. 46–69 DOI 10.13137/2283-5482/22382 SLAVICA TERGESTINA 20 (2018/I) ▶ Literary Theory in Bulgaria A 1980s debate between Bulgarian В этом исследовании дискуссия с “structuralists” and so called “im- восьмидесятых годов ХХ века между pressionist critics” provides a line of болгарскими «структуралистами» demarcation between structuralists и так называемыми «импрессио- and post-structuralists while simul- нистскими критиками» рассматри- taneously delineating “Orphism” as вается как способ разграничения the heavily controversial theoretical болгарских структуралистов и counterpart to the rise of Thracian постструктуралистов. В то же время studies in archeology and historiogra- эта дискуссия позволяет наметить phy. Since national identity turns out «орфизм» как арена теоретических to be a major ideological wager of these разногласий, разворачивающихся controversies, they acquire an unfore- параллельно с ростом фракологии в seen relevance today. исторических науках. Поскольку на- циональная идентичность является одним из идеологических залогов этих разногласий, они оказываются сегодня неожиданно актуальными. орфизм, фракийская Orphism, Thracian myThOlOgy, мифология, поздний laTe cOmmunism, naTiOnalism, комунизм, национализм, naTiOnal idenTiTy национальная идентичность 47 MIGLENA NIKOLCHINA ▶ Anti-Odysseus: Orphism and Late Communism in Bulgaria 1 This essay explores a peculiar trend in 1980s Bulgarian theoretical The master mind behind the rocketing thinking which might be termed Orphism and which accompanied of Thracian studies (Thracology) and the – without necessarily recognizing, or being recognized by – the rise inventor of Orphism 1 (Fol 1986) as the ancient of Thracian studies in archeology and historiography.