145 Was Joyous and Beautiful. and As I Sit with Open Box Before Me

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

145 Was Joyous and Beautiful. and As I Sit with Open Box Before Me THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 145 was joyous and beautiful. And as I sit with open box before me and listen to the sleet driven from out the winter darkness against the window panes, I dream of June vacation days-the scent of spruce and fir arises and I gaze across the logs through shimmering heat waves to the cool shadows of the clustering pines. NEW LIFE HISTORIES IN PAPAIPEMA SM. (LEPIDOPTERA.) BY HENRY BIRD, RYE, N. Y. (Continued from p. 115). Papaipema speciosissima G & R. A thirteen-year search for the larva of this species, one of the few eastern ones remaining unknown, culminated successfully in 1913. By reason of its fine coloration and large size the species was well known as a moth, even though but few exan~plesever found a way into collection. At the time of the description in 1868 (Trans. Am. Ent. Soc., Vol. I, 342), Grote and Robinson relate receiving their type from Seekonk, a suburb of Providence, R. I., and an accompanying figure made its individuality clear. Thirty years later Prof. J. B. Smith found "perhaps a dozen fernale examples" in the aggregate of the principal American collections which he perused when writing monographically of the genus. While known to be generally scattered over the north-eastern United States, most of the examples coming to light of late years bore the label of northern Kew Jersey. As the establishment of the preferred food-plant through a painstaking search has brought out a bearing of primitive conditions on the result, it may be helpful to relate details. It was conceded the larva would have a boring habit, its large size would indicate the occupation of some stocky stein or root, so this problem of isolating the food-plant was the first question, and one beset by certain ecological features. So long ago as 1900 the writer visited the type locality in hopes of meeting some plant peculiar to that section which might furnish a clue to the desider- atum. Obviously, one way of getting an idea of a !ikely plant for investigation would be to visit a number of places \\-here the May, 1915 146 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST moth had occurred, compare the floral conditions, and note the suitable plant forms common to such stations. Working on these lines many stations from Montreal, Can., to Wilmington, Del., were visited, but the results led nowhere. What did appear was that the great semi-tidal marsh westward of Jersey City and Hoboken, S.J., yearly gave up a few of the moths, and made it apparent an established colony must be flourishing in these fastnesses. The flora of this region is of the usual luxuriance of an ancient marsh, though modified by a considerable salinity in its lower reaches. Very conspicuous are a number of giant grasses, Phragmites phrag- mites, Spartinu cynosuroides, Zizania aquatics, and others, which are capable and fit to serve as food-plants. For many years we laboured under the impression that some of these grasses must be the answer to the riddle. A number of large herbaceous species also occur and the field for investigation was a large one. From a contemplative viewpoint this habitat offers much to be desired. Many of the floral conditions here have seen little change in the last piling up of centuries, certain sections remaining doubtless in their pre-Columbian verdancy, and we should, theoretically at least, find our larva easily. But the proximity to so great a popula- tion has produced much artificiali~yand the region is interspersed by numerous railroads that are responsible for frequent burnings. The principal hinderance to a thorough search, however, is the fact ' that the territory is wet to submergence except during very droughty times. Our meeting with the larva of P. inquesita in a Cryptogam, in 1898, made us early mindful of the ferns, though the food- plants of the genus centre principally among the Composites. Light dawned in 1912 when P. stenocelis proves a fern feeder, for inquesita, stenocelis and speciosissima are a trio aloof from the allies, and it becomes clear we must now also look for the latter in a fern. But what fern was peculiar to the Jersey Meadows? Early in 1913 we found a young borer at work in Aspidium, at Rye, but the instance did not reflect a normal operation for our desider- atum. Latterly, Mr. Otto Buchholz, of Elizabeth, N. J., had rendered assistance in the Jersey Meadow hunt, being close by the field, and keen, through a wide experience and with a skill rarely equalled, for detective work of this nature. Upon being advised THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 147 the search had narrowed down to the ferns, with usual acumen, he soon located the great colony of the Meadows. It developed the common Osmundas are the ones chosen, both 0. regalis and 0. cinnamomea being infested. Whether 0. claytoniana is also bored did not develope, since that species did not occur here, being a denizen of dryer places. While it is a surprise this common fern proves the food-plant so long sought, Osmunda regalis being the favourite, and that negative results had followed its examination in hundreds of cases previously, the prominent feature is the localized colony encountered, with the evidence of its probable antiquity. From twenty years' observation on the growth of Osmunda under our windows, we do not hesitate to state that most of these individual plants represent fifty years development at least. The gnarled, ruminating root-stocks are elevated 50 to 60 cm. above the level of the quaking morass, in the effort to get above the water and from the nature of the yearly accumulations, and show the borings of preceding generations. The presence of the larva in 0. regalis is not easily noted. There is no wilting or drying of a collspicuous frond as happens with the other fern borers. The newly emerged larva enters a miniature stipe whose uncoiled, tender tip has sprung up but three or four centimeters, and in a few days has tunnelled down into the root-stock. This dies, it is true, and is some evidence, but a peculiarity with this fern in this locality seems to be that many more fronds start than eventually mature, what appears to be a fungous blight nipping some in their tender incipiency. Further, a dipterous larva bores these young stipes and causes them to die, so that we find two other similar results produced at the same time in the plant, as is occasioned by the working of speciosissima. As the larval period lengthens, the frass thrown out is the only indica- tion, and this is not in the usual well-formed pellets, but a rusty- brown, mud-like deposit. Even this sign is hard to detect for the fruiting fronds send down their brown inflorescence, which, with the chaff-like scales from the stipes sprinkle the root-stock and help to smother the meagre clues. So the apprehension of this larva is not as easy as with most others, and the surprise greater, when, at maturity, one of these old roots is cleft open, disclosing 148 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST - a pair often of great pink larvze which have their whereabouts hidden to such a remarkable degree. The last week of May can be assigned as the date of general emergence from the over-wintering egg, and maturity is reached about Aug. 1. It did not develope that there was the usual amount of parasitism from the smaller hymenoptera that work so assidu- ously against most of the allies about the fourth instar, and only Ceromasia myoidaa seemed to assail the last stages, but this Tachinid was a prevalent check. The following brief tabulation, except for the first instar, may sufficiently place the larva: Stage 11.-Generically typical, of the group with dark purplish- brown girdle which is not crossed by the white lines; head shows side line; tubercles well developed but not large, blackish, IVa absent on joint ten. Head and cephalic shield concolorous, dorsal and subdorsal lines whitish and broken at girdle. Stage 111.-Colour unchanged, tubercles not prominent, except on joint eleven 111 and llla are fused into a large plate greater than the spiracle and the latter somewhat larger than the anterior ones, and on twelve I and I1 are of the usual prominence. Stage 1V.-Head has lost dark line at ocelli, is chestnut brown; the cephalic shield is as wide as head, yellow, margined laterally with a black border; lines white and conspicuous, the girdle becomes a shade paler; tubercles the same. Stage V.-Colour changes to a pinker tone, otherwise similar; the fused 111 and IIIa on eleven remain the largest of the lateral plates, which on the whole are small. Penultimate Stage.-Colour is pronounced pink, the trans- lucence at the sutures giving a ringed appearance, the white lines are nearly lost except the dorsal on the thoracic joints; tubercles and spiracles black, the former reduced; 111 and IIIa have separated on joint eleven. Maturity.-A robust larva with prominent brown head, cephalic and anal plates, the tubercles except I and I1 on joint twelve inconspicuous; IVa has never developed on joint ten, and on eleven 111 and IIIa still more separated, the former the largest lateral plate; IV never gains its usual prominence as occurs with THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 149 most other congeners. The colour is a pale pinkish hue, and with the large size is productive of an individuality pronounced with this species. Length, when full grown, 50 mm.; breadth, 7 mm. The gallery is abandoned for pupation, dates Aug.
Recommended publications
  • Borer Moth (Papaipema Marginidens (Guenee))
    Conservation Assessment for the Brick-Red Borer Moth (Papaipema marginidens (Guenee)) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region December 6, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Lepidoptera Associated with Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Marshall (Oleaceae) in the Red River Valley of Eastern North Dakota
    A FAUNAL SURVEY OF COLEOPTERA, HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA MARSHALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By James Samuel Walker In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Entomology March 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School North DakotaTitle State University North DaGkroadtaua Stet Sacteho Uolniversity A FAUNAL SURVEYG rOFad COLEOPTERA,uate School HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH Title A FFRAXINUSAUNAL S UPENNSYLVANICARVEY OF COLEO MARSHALLPTERTAitl,e HEM (OLEACEAE)IPTERA (HET INER THEOPTE REDRA), AND LAE FPAIDUONPATLE RSUAR AVSESYO COIFA CTOEDLE WOIPTTHE RFRAA, XHIENMUISP PTENRNAS (YHLEVTAENRICOAP TMEARRAS),H AANLDL RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA L(EOPLIDEAOCPTEEAREA) I ANS TSHOEC RIAETDE RDI VWEITRH V FARLALXEIYN UOSF P EEANSNTSEYRLNV ANNOICRAT HM DAARKSHOATALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VAL LEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA ByB y By JAMESJAME SSAMUEL SAMUE LWALKER WALKER JAMES SAMUEL WALKER TheThe Su pSupervisoryervisory C oCommitteemmittee c ecertifiesrtifies t hthatat t hthisis ddisquisition isquisition complies complie swith wit hNorth Nor tDakotah Dako ta State State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of University’s regulations and meetMASTERs the acce pOFted SCIENCE standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: David A. Rider DCoa-­CCo-Chairvhiadi rA.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 34 Number 2 - Fall/Winter 2001 Number 2 - Fall/ Article 3 Winter 2001 October 2001 Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio Roy W. Rings Ohio State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Rings, Roy W. 2001. "Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 34 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol34/iss2/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Rings: Check List of Identified Lepidoptera Collected at Mud Lake State 2001 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 9 CHECK LIST OF IDENTIFIED LEPIDOPTERA COLLECTED AT MUD LAKE STATE NATURE PRESERVE, WILLIAMS COUNTY, OHIO Roy W, Rings 1 ABSTRACT A total of696 species ofLepidoptera is reported from the Mud Lake State Nature Preserve, Williams County, Ohio. This preserve is only a few miles from both the Indiana and Michigan state borders. The great biodiversity of moths is reflected in the bog, fen, shrub swamp, and marsh communities bor­ dering the lake. A check list of species summarizes identified collections for 1988,1992,1995 and 1996 and includes the Hodges et al (1983) species num­ bers, the scientific name, and the numbers collected by different collecting methods.
    [Show full text]
  • DE Wildlife Action Plan
    DelawareDelaware WildlifeWildlife ActionAction PlanPlan Keeping Today’s Wildlife from Becoming Tomorrow’s Memory Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Fish and Wildlife 89 King Highway Dover, Delaware 19901 [email protected] Delaware Wildlife Action Plan 2007 - 2017 Submitted to: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Westgate Center Drive Hadley, MA 01035-9589 September, 2006 Submitted by: Olin Allen, Biologist Brianna Barkus, Outreach Coordinator Karen Bennett, Program Manager Cover Photos by: Chris Bennett, Chuck Fullmer, Mike Trumabauer, DE Div. of Fish & Wildlife Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control 89 Kings Highway Dover DE 19901 Delaware Wildlife Action Plan Acknowledgements This project was funded, in part, through grants from the Delaware Division of Fish & Wildlife with funding from the Division of Federal Assistance, United States Fish & Wildlife Service under the State Wildlife Grants Program; and the Delaware Coastal Programs with funding from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under award number NA17OZ2329. We gratefully acknowledge the participation of the following individuals: Jen Adkins Sally Kepfer NV Raman Chris Bennett Gary Kreamer Ken Reynolds Melinda Carl Annie Larson Ellen Roca John Clark Wayne Lehman Bob Rufe Rick Cole Jeff Lerner Tom Saladyga Robert Coxe Rob Line Craig Shirey Janet
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JT Troubridge and JD Lafontaine: Noctuidae Part 3.3: Hadeninae
    Moths of Canada: J. T. Troubridge and J. D. Lafontaine: Noctuidae Part 3.3: Hadeninae: Apameini Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility Noctuidae: Group 3.3: Trifid subfamilies Hadeninae: Apameini Achatodes zeae Amphipoea americana Amphipoea americana Amphipoea interoceanica Amphipoea interoceanica Amphipoea velata Annaphila danistica Annaphila decia Annaphila diva Apamea acera Apamea alia Apamea amputatrix Apamea amputatrix Apamea antennata Apamea apamiformis Apamea atriclava Apamea burgessi Apamea cariosa Apamea centralis Apamea cinefacta Apamea cogitata Apamea commoda Apamea commoda Apamea contradicta Apamea cristata file:///D|/noctuidae/Noctuidae%20Part%203.3.htm (1 of 6) [3/25/2004 1:18:47 PM] Moths of Canada: J. T. Troubridge and J. D. Lafontaine: Noctuidae Part 3.3: Hadeninae: Apameini Apamea cuculliformis Apamea devastator Apamea dubitans Apamea helva Apamea impulsa Apamea inebriata Apamea inficita Apamea inordinata Apamea lignicolora Apamea longula Apamea lutosa Apamea maxima Apamea mixta Apamea nigrior Apamea niveivenosa Apamea niveivenosa Apamea occidens Apamea ophiogramma Apamea ophiogramma Apamea plutonia Apamea remissa Apamea scoparia Apamea sora Apamea sordens Apamea spaldingi Apamea unanimis Apamea unita Apamea verbascoides Apamea vulgaris Apamea vultuosa file:///D|/noctuidae/Noctuidae%20Part%203.3.htm (2 of 6) [3/25/2004 1:18:47 PM] Moths of Canada: J. T. Troubridge and J. D. Lafontaine: Noctuidae Part 3.3: Hadeninae: Apameini Apamea zeta Archanara laeta Archanara oblonga Archanara subflava Benjaminiola colorada Celaena
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    Final Report Project Name: Historical Occurrence & Present Status of Insect Species in Greatest Need of Conservation Project Number: T-38-P-001 Principal Investigator: C. H. Dietrich Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S Oak St., Champaign, IL 21820; phone (217) 244-7408 IDNR Project Manager: John Buhnerkempe Effective Dates: 03/01/2007-02/28/2012 Introduction Insects are the most diverse class of animals included on the Illinois list of Species in Greatest Need of Conservation (SGNC). The exact number of insect species native to Illinois is unknown, but certainly exceeds 30,000. Although precise data on long-term population trends are available for relatively few insect species, recent surveys by Panzer and colleagues in the Chicago metropolitan area (Panzer et al. 1995) indicated that ca. 13% of the prairie-inhabiting insect species originally recorded from the region have been extirpated. A more recent general insect sampling program, part of the Critical Trends Assessment Project at the Illinois Natural History Survey, has shown that declines in the state’s insect fauna have paralleled those observed for birds, reptiles and amphibians, and vascular plants. This sampling, conducted over the past 15 years, indicates that “typical” (i.e., poor quality) grasslands and wetlands collectively support less than 30% of the species originally recorded from such habitats in Illinois (Dietrich 2009). Published data on long-term trends in insect populations are available only for a few pest species. For species not considered to be of economic importance, the most extensive historical data available are those associated with specimens deposited in insect collections. The insect collection of the Illinois Natural History Survey (INHS), which houses specimens accumulated over the past 150+ years, is the largest and oldest repository of information on the insect fauna of Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2025 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan
    2 0 1 5 – 2 0 2 5 Species Assessments Appendix 1.1A – Birds A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Avifauna for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 (Jason Hill, PhD) Assessment of eBird data for the importance of Pennsylvania as a bird migratory corridor (Andy Wilson, PhD) Appendix 1.1B – Mammals A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Mammals, Utilizing NatureServe Ranking Methodology and Rank Calculator Version 3.1 for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 (Charlie Eichelberger and Joe Wisgo) Appendix 1.1C – Reptiles and Amphibians A Revision of the State Conservation Ranks of Pennsylvania’s Herpetofauna Appendix 1.1D – Fishes A Revision of the State Conservation Ranks of Pennsylvania’s Fishes Appendix 1.1E – Invertebrates Invertebrate Assessment for the 2015 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan Revision 2015-2025 Pennsylvania Wildlife Action Plan Appendix 1.1A - Birds A Comprehensive Status Assessment of Pennsylvania’s Avifauna for Application to the State Wildlife Action Plan Update 2015 Jason M. Hill, PhD. Table of Contents Assessment ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Data Sources ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Species Selection ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups
    Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Final Report Prepared by: Christopher S. Hobson For: The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias Date: 15 April 2010 This report may be cited as follows: Hobson, C.S. 2010. Powell Mountain Karst Preserve: Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups. Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, Virginia. Unpublished report submitted to The Cave Conservancy of the Virginias. April 2010. 30 pages plus appendices. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Biological Inventory of Vegetation Communities, Vascular Plants, and Selected Animal Groups Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage Natural Heritage Technical Report 10-12 April 2010 Contents List of Tables......................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures........................................................................................................................ iii Introduction............................................................................................................................ 1 Geology.................................................................................................................................. 2 Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec
    The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec Eric W. Rockburne and J. Donald Lafontaine Biosystematics Research Institute Ottawa, Ontario Photographs by Thomas H. Stovell Research Branch Canada Department of Agriculture Publication 1593 1976 © Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1976 Available by mail from Printing and Publishing Supply and Services Canada Ottawa, Canada K 1A 089 or through your bookseller. Catalogue No. A43-1593/1976 Price: Canada: $ 8.50 ISBN 0-660-00514-X Other countries: $10.20 Price subject to change without notice. 01 A05-6-38481 The Cutworm Moths of Ontario and Quebec INTRODUCTION The cutworm, or owlet, moths constitute a family belonging to the order Lepidoptera. This order consists of all the moths and butterflies. Cutworm moths are common throughout the world. In Canada and the United States over three thousand species are represented, from the Arctic tundra to the arid deserts of southwestern United States. Many species are found in eastern North America, but the family is best represented in the mountains and on the plateaus of western North America. CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE In zoology, classification is the systematic arrangement of animals into related groups and categories, and nomenclature is the system of names given to these groups. The cutworm moths are insects that belong in the class Insecta. Insecta is divided into several orders: Diptera, the true flies: Hymenoptera. the wasps, bees, and ants: Coleoptera. the beetles, and so on. The order Lepidoptera includes all the moths and butterflies. Each order is divided into a number of families, and the Noctuidae family, which includes all the cutworm moths, is a family of the Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Inventory of Habitats in the Area of Sandy, Jeremiah and Old Pocha
    Inventory of Habitats in the Area of Sandy, Jeremiah and Old Pocha Roads for State-listed Insects Mark J. Mello Research Director Lloyd Center for the Environment 430 Potomska Rd. Dartmouth. MA 02748 INTRODUCTION Pitch pine/scrub oak barrens contain a mosaic of globally rare habitats (including pitch pine woodland, scrub oak thickets, heathlands, sandplain grasslands, and acid wetlands) located primarily on the coastal plain from Maine to New Jersey. A few sandy riverine oxbows and serpentine mountain ridgetops also support smaller patches of barrens. Roughly half of the original acreage remains, approximately 900,000 acres. Although most of the remaining barrens habitat (750,000 acres) is in New Jersey, Massachusetts ranks third, with about 53,000 acres in southeastern Massachusetts (Cryan, 1985). As the name indicates, these barrens are dominated by pitch pine (Pinus rigida) and scrub oak (Quercus ilicifolia). The nutrient poor, acid soils also support a variety of blueberries and huckleberries (Ericaceae) in the understory. Pitch pine/scrub oak barrens is a disclimax habitat that requires disturbance, particularly periodic fires, in order to maintain itself. Nearly sixty percent (23 out of 39) of the rare moth fauna listed in the Massachusetts Endangered Species Protection Act (Table 1) as of June, 2006 are found primarily in scrub oak barrens (9 species), coastal heathlands (8 species), or sandplain grasslands (7 species). Forty-four percent (17 of 39) are restricted to native heathland or shrubland (including scrub oak barrens) habitat as described by Wagner et al (2003); and this number represents only a fraction of the 56 species of “Conservation Concern” they list as uncommon shrubland/heathland specialists.
    [Show full text]