384 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices

produced in the United States or are INTERNATIONAL TRADE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: otherwise available in the United States, COMMISSION Daniel L. Girdwood, Esq., Office of with respect to the articles potentially Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. subject to the orders; and [Inv. No. 337–TA–753] International Trade Commission, (iv) Indicate whether Complainant, telephone (202) 205–3409. Complainant’s licensees, and/or third Certain Semiconductor Chips and Authority: The authority for institution of party suppliers have the capacity to Products Containing Same; Notice of this investigation is contained in section 337 replace the volume of articles Investigation of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and potentially subject to an exclusion order in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules and a cease and desist order within a AGENCY: U.S. International Trade of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 commercially reasonable time. Commission. (2010). Written submissions must be filed no ACTION: Institution of investigation Scope of Investigation: Having later than by close of business, five pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. considered the complaint, the U.S. business days after the date of International Trade Commission, on publication of this notice in the Federal SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a December 28, 2010, Ordered That— Register. There will be further complaint was filed with the U.S. (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of opportunities for comment on the International Trade Commission on section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as public interest after the issuance of any December 1, 2010, under section 337 of amended, an investigation be instituted final initial determination in this the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 to determine whether there is a investigation. U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Rambus Inc. of violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of Persons filing written submissions Sunnyvale, California. The complaint section 337 in the importation into the must file the original document and 12 alleges violations of section 337 based United States, the sale for importation, true copies thereof on or before the upon the importation into the United or the sale within the United States after deadlines stated above with the Office States, the sale for importation, and the importation of certain semiconductor of the Secretary. Submissions should sale within the United States after chips and products containing same that refer to the docket number (‘‘Docket No. importation of certain semiconductor infringe one or more of claims 11–13, 2777’’) in a prominent place on the chips and products containing same by 15, and 18 of the ‘405 patent; claims 11– cover page and/or the first page. The reason of infringement of certain claims 13 of the ‘353 patent; claims 1, 2, 4, 5, Commission’s rules authorize filing of U.S. Patent No. 6,470,405 (‘‘the ‘405 12, 13, 20, 21, and 24 of the ‘109 patent; submissions with the Secretary by patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,591,353 (‘‘the claims 1, 2, 4–6, 9–13, 24–28, 31–36, facsimile or electronic means only to the ‘353 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,287,109 39–44, 47, and 49–53 of the ‘857 patent; extent permitted by section 201.8 of the (‘‘the ‘109 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. claims 1, 2, 4, 7, and 20 of the ‘858 rules (see Handbook for Electronic 7,602,857 (‘‘the ‘857 patent’’); U.S. patent; and claims 1–3, 6, 8, 25, 26, 30, Filing Procedures, http://www.usitc.gov/ Patent No. 7,602,858 (‘‘the ‘858 patent’’); 39, 40, and 42 of the ‘494 patent, and secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ U.S. Patent No. 7,715,494 (‘‘the ‘494 whether an industry in the United documents/ patent’’). The complaint further alleges States exists as required by subsection handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). that an industry in the United States (a)(2) of section 337; Persons with questions regarding exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of (2) For the purpose of the electronic filing should contact the section 337. investigation so instituted, the following Secretary (202–205–2000). The complainant requests that the are hereby named as parties upon which Any person desiring to submit a Commission institute an investigation this notice of investigation shall be document to the Commission in and, after the investigation, issue an served: confidence must request confidential exclusion order and cease and desist (a) The complainant is: treatment. All such requests should be orders. Rambus Inc., 1050 Enterprise Way, directed to the Secretary to the Suite 700, Sunnyvale, CA 94089. ADDRESSES: Commission and must include a full The complaint, except for (b) The respondents are the following statement of the reasons why the any confidential information contained entities alleged to be in violation of Commission should grant such therein, is available for inspection section 337, and are the parties upon treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents during official business hours (8:45 a.m. which the complaint is to be served: for which confidential treatment by the to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., 6501 Commission is properly sought will be William Cannon Drive West, Austin, treated accordingly. All nonconfidential Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone TX 78735. written submissions will be available for Broadcom Corporation, 5300 California 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired public inspection at the Office of the Avenue, Irvine, CA 92617. Secretary. individuals are advised that information LSI Corporation, 1621 Barber Lane, This action is taken under the on this matter can be obtained by Milpitas, CA 95035. authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act contacting the Commission’s TDD MediaTek Inc., No. 1, Dusing Road 1, of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons Hsinchu Science Park, Hsin-Chu, and of sections 201.10 and 210.50(a)(4) with mobility impairments who will Taiwan 30078. of the Commission’s Rules of Practice need special assistance in gaining access nVidia Corporation, 2701 San Tomas and Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, to the Commission should contact the Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050. 210.50(a)(4)). Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. STMicroelectronics N.V., 39, Chemin du General information concerning the Champ des Filles, C. P. 21CH 1228 By order of the Commission. Commission may also be obtained by Plan-Les-Ouates, Geneva, Issued: December 28, 2010. accessing its Internet server at http:// Switzerland. Marilyn R. Abbott, www.usitc.gov. The public record for STMicroelectronics Inc., 1310 Secretary to the Commission. this investigation may be viewed on the Electronics Dr., Carrollton, TX 75006. [FR Doc. 2010–33131 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) Asustek Computer Inc., 15, Li The Road, BILLING CODE 7020–02–P at http://edis.usitc.gov. Taipei City 11259, Taiwan.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:38 Jan 03, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 385

Asus Computer International Inc., 800 Daniel L. Girdwood, Esq., Office of Consent Decree settles claims for, inter Corporate Way, Fremont, CA 94539. Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. alia, response costs to address Audio Partnership Plc., Gallery Court, International Trade Commission, 500 E hazardous substances released at the Hankey Place, London SE1 4BB, Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC Moses Lake Wellfield Superfund Site United Kingdom. 20436; and (Site). Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) Corp., 18551 (3) For the investigation so instituted, The complaint asserts claims against East Gale Avenue, City of Industry, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief the defendants—The Boeing Company, CA 91748. Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Lockheed Martin Corporation, and the Biostar Microtech International Corp., International Trade Commission, shall City of Moses Lake—for response costs 2 Fl., 108–2, Ming Chuan Road, Hsin designate the presiding Administrative incurred at the Site by the United States Tien, Taiwan. Law Judge. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 West Tasman Responses to the complaint and the and the United States Army Corps of Drive, San Jose, CA 95134–1706. notice of investigation must be Engineers (Corps) pursuant to the Elitegroup Computer Systems, No. 239, submitted by the named respondents in section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Sec. 2, Ti Ding Blvd., Taipei, Taiwan accordance with section 210.13 of the Environmental Response, 11493. Commission’s Rules of Practice and Compensation, and Liability Act EVGA Corporation, 2900 Saturn Street, Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). The Suite B, Brea, CA 92821. 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), complaint also seeks a declaratory Galaxy Microsystems Ltd., Room 1101– such responses will be considered by judgment of liability against the 1103, 11/F, Enterprise Square Two, 3 the Commission if received not later defendants for future response costs Sheung Yuet Road, Kowloon Bay, than 20 days after the date of service by incurred by EPA and the Corps at the KLN., Hong Kong. the Commission of the complaint and Site. The State of Washington also filed Garmin International, 1200 E. 151st the notice of investigation. Extensions of a complaint on December 23, 2010, Street, Olathe, KS 66062–3426. time for submitting responses to the asserting claims for response costs G.B.T. Inc., 17358 Railroad St., City of complaint and the notice of against the defendants as well as against Industry, CA 91748. investigation will not be granted unless the United States. Giga-Byte Technology Co., Ltd., No. 6, good cause therefore is shown. Under the proposed Consent Decree, Bau Chiang Road, Hsin-Tien, Taipei Failure of a respondent to file a timely the defendants will make payments to 231, Taiwan. response to each allegation in the the United States totaling $3.25 million Gracom Technologies LLC, 1214 John complaint and in this notice may be to resolve their CERCLA liability at the Reed Ct., City of Industry, CA 91745. deemed to constitute a waiver of the Site. The United States, on behalf of a Hewlett-Packard Company, 3000 right to appear and contest the group of settling Federal agencies Hanover St., Palo Alto, CA 94304. allegations of the complaint and this including the United States Air Force, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, notice, and to authorize the will make payments to EPA for the 3403 Yerba Buena Road, San Jose, CA administrative law judge and the future response costs that are not 95135. Commission, without further notice to covered by the defendants’ payments. Jaton Corporation, 47677 Lakeview the respondent, to find the facts to be as The United States will also pay, on Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538. alleged in the complaint and this notice behalf of the settling Federal agencies, Jaton Technology TPE, 10F, No. 194, and to enter an initial determination future response costs incurred by the State of Washington. Based on cleanup Sec. 3, Ta-Tung Road, Hsi-Chih, and a final determination containing cost estimates, the United States’ Taiwan. such findings, and may result in the payments on behalf of the settling Micro-Star International Co., Ltd., No. issuance of an exclusion order or a cease Federal agencies, which will be largely 69, Li-De St., Jung-He City, Taipei and desist order or both directed against to EPA, are expected to be Hsien, Taiwan. the respondent. MSI Computer Corporation, 901 Canada approximately $55 million. The Court, City of Industry, California By order of the Commission. payments by the United States resolve 91748. Issued: December 29, 2010. claims against it by the State of Motorola, Inc., 1303 East Algonquin Marilyn R. Abbott, Washington as well as claims by the Road, Schaumburg, IL 60196. Secretary to the Commission. defendants. In addition, the United Oppo Digital, Inc., 2629 Terminal Blvd., [FR Doc. 2010–33207 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] States, on behalf of the settling Federal Suite B, Mountain View, CA 94043. BILLING CODE 7020–02–P agencies, will pay the City of Moses Palit Microsystems Ltd., 21F, 88, Sec. 2, Lake approximately $2.96 million to Chung Hsiao E. Rd., Taipei, Taiwan. resolve claims for response costs and attorney fees asserted by the City of Pine Technology Holdings, Ltd., Unit A, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 32/F Manulife Tower, 169 Electric Moses Lake in its related pending Road, North Point, Hong Kong. Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree lawsuit, No. 04–0376. Seagate Technology, 920 Disc Drive, Under the Comprehensive The Department of Justice will receive Scotts Valley, CA 95066. Environmental Response, written comments relating to the Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., 5F.–7, No. Compensation and Liability Act proposed Consent Decree for a period of 79, Sec. 1, Xintai 5th Rd., Xizhi City, thirty (30) days from the date of Taipei County 221, Taiwan. In accordance with Departmental publication of this notice. Comments Zotac International (MCO) Ltd., 19/F., Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby should be addressed to the Assistant Shatin Galleria, 18–24 Shan Mei given that a proposed Consent Decree in Attorney General, Environment and Street, Fo Tan, Shatin, N.T. Hong United States of America v. The Boeing Natural Resources Division, and either Kong. Company et al., Civil Action No. 10– e-mailed to pubcomment- Zotac USA Inc., 17921 Rowland Street, 457–LRS (E.D. Wa.), was lodged with [email protected] or mailed to P.O. City of Industry, CA 91748. the United States District Court for the Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, (c) The Commission investigative Western District of Washington on Washington, DC 20044–7611, and attorney, party to this investigation, is December 23, 2010. The proposed should refer to United States of America

VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:35 Jan 03, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04JAN1.SGM 04JAN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES