DOCSLIB.ORG

The Clinton Foundation a Cauldron of Conflicts and Cronyism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Clinton Foundation a Cauldron of Conflicts and Cronyism Stopping Juvenile Detention: The Clinton Foundation A cauldron of conflicts and cronyism By Barbara Joanna Lucas Summary : The former fi rst family’s phi- lanthropy has always been a vehicle to pro- mote the careers of the Clintons. It does some good things that help people but in recent years it has functioned more like an unoffi cial campaign headquarters for Hil- lary Clinton’s 2016 presidential bid. And if there is one thing the Clintons are good at, it’s getting paid. The Clintons said the char- ity would not accept donations from foreign governments while Mrs. Clinton served as Secretary of State. They must have been crossing their fi ngers behind their backs because it was recently revealed that the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from foreign governments during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure at the State Depart- ment. Making matters worse, Hillary Clin- ton’s cavalier approach to U.S. national se- curity has also spilled over into her family’s foundation – and a new book called “the most anticipated and feared book of a pres- Hillary and Bill Clinton idential cycle still in its infancy” is to be published this month. The Clinton Foun- Before Obama even took offi ce, the Clin- dation may soon dominate news cycles, but ton Foundation’s chairman of the board, not the way the Clintons wanted. Bruce Lindsey, signed a Memorandum of May 2015 Understanding on Dec. 12, 2008 with Val- erie Jarrett, then co-chair of President-elect CONTENTS Obama’s transition team. The document provided that “During any service by Senator The Clinton Foundation he Obama White House has had Clinton as Secretary of State, the Founda- Page 1 little to say about Hillary Clinton’s tion will publish annually the names of all egregious violation of her agreement T new contributors.” We now know that the Philanthropy Notes with the Obama administration, even though foundation cast aside its promise to make Page 8 it is President Barack Obama who should be timely disclosure of donations it took in from offended most by the broken pledge. foreign sources. Foundation Watch And in recent days Reuters discovered that Department business would be spelled out around the world. And they have helped us the Clinton Foundation fi led incorrect Form in the 30,000 e-mails that were deleted. It’s support the work that this foundation does. 990 disclosures with the IRS. All nonprofi ts possible Hillary Clinton was telling the truth … Do I agree with all the foreign policy have to fi le the document once a year, after when she said all of those deleted e-mail of Saudi Arabia? No.” ( New York Times , which it becomes publicly available. As messages were about weddings and yoga. March 20, 2015). a result of Reuters reporting, the Clinton But with the e-mails gone, it’s unknow- Foundation admitted that its IRS fi lings from able, while Hillary is asking us to trust and In late March, Republican National Commit- 2010 through 2012 and those of its Clinton not verify. tee Chairman Reince Priebus sent a letter to Health Access Initiative (CHAI) from 2012 Jarrett, now a White House Senior Adviser. and 2013 are not accurate. The foundation The memorandum further asserted that the Among the questions in the letter were (1) does not rule out the possibility of revisiting State Department would review any paid “At what point did the Administration be- its IRS fi lings going back 15 years. speeches by the secretary’s husband. The come aware that the MOU and the process Obama transition team at the time said in a of vetting Clinton Foundation donors were According to Reuters, “[f]or three years in a statement, “We believe the agreement with fl awed?” (2) “What did the White House do, row beginning in 2010, the Clinton Founda- the Clinton Foundation meets our goals of if anything, to mitigate issues with the Clinton tion reported to the IRS that it received zero transparency and goes above and beyond in Foundation’s donors?” (3) “Was the White in funds from foreign and U.S. governments, preventing confl icts.” House aware that the MOU was insuffi cient a dramatic fall-off from the tens of millions of while Clinton was serving as Secretary of dollars in foreign government contributions The agreement itself may have met those State? If so, were any addendums added reported in preceding years.” It’s suspicious goals—if only the foundation had abided to supplement the MOU?” (4) “Was there to say the least. by it. any independent audit or verifi cation that the Clinton Foundation was abiding by the Shortly after the recent revelations of foreign Foreign Donors MOU’s Donor Disclosure provisions?” (5) money pouring into the Bill, Hillary, and While Hillary Clinton served as Secretary “Were foreign governments that contributed Chelsea Clinton Foundation came reports of State, the governments of Kuwait, Qatar, to the Clinton Foundation given special treat- of the e-mail fl ap. Are the matters linked? Oman, Australia, Norway, Algeria, and the ment or consideration by the White House?” Well, the public cannot know if the potential Dominican Republic all lavished millions of (6) “If the White House had been aware of confl icts regarding foreign donors and State dollars on the Clinton Foundation. While the violations, would the Clinton Foundation acting coy when questioned about most of or Secretary Clinton have been reprimanded Editor: Matthew Vadum these, the Clinton Foundation has admitted it in some fashion for their actions?” Publisher: Terrence Scanlon should have sought approval from the State Department before accepting $500,000 from “The public deserves detailed answers to Foundation Watch the government of Algeria. Whoops. these questions. I request a response to each is published by Capital Research Center, a non-partisan education and in writing,” the RNC chairman continued. research organization, classifi ed by For the entirety of the Clinton Foundation’s “The MOU was billed to the public and Con- the IRS as a 501(c)(3) public charity. existence, foreign donors made up one-third gress as a pledge toward transparency and Address: of all donors giving more than $1 million the avoidance of confl icts of interest. The 1513 16th Street, N.W. and made up more than half of donors who American people deserve to know whether Washington, DC 20036-1480 gave $5 million or more ( Washington Post , it was nothing more than a memorandum Phone: (202) 483-6900 February 18, 2015). between parties that had no real interest in Long-Distance: (800) 459-3950 either of these goals.” E-mail Address: In fact, Bill Clinton even saw the foreign [email protected] donations from shady countries as a positive. For its part, the White House had little to say Web Site: “I think it is a good thing—for example, the when asked whether the foundation was get- http://www.capitalresearch.org U.A.E. gave us money,” the former president ting money from foreign governments. “I’m Organization Trends welcomes let- said of the United Arab Emirates. “Do we certainly not going to have a response to them ters to the editor. agree with everything they do? No. But from here, but I think that was a letter that Reprints are available for $2.50 pre- they are helping us fi ght ISIS, and they built they sent to the State Department?” White paid to Capital Research Center. a great university with NYU, open to people House spokesman Josh Earnest told the 2 May 2015 Foundation Watch press. “You mentioned both the contents of “We will see a pattern of fi nancial transac- “No, David,” Brzezinski said. “That’s the the letter describing the Clinton Foundation tions involving the Clintons that occurred way the law works, Mika,” Brock replied, and the actions of the Secretary of State at the contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy saying that individual government agencies State Department. So, I wouldn’t anticipate decisions benefi ting those providing the are allowed to decide how their records a response from here.” funds,” Schweizer writes. should be archived. When a journalist responded, “But it was Paid by radical billionaire George Soros, the Brzezinski bristled at that answer and said the White House that was supposed to have leftists at the Center for American Progress angrily, “No, actually, David, you don’t have the agreement overseeing it,” Earnest said, and Media Matters for America are doing to give me a lesson on the regulations of the “Well again, for questions about actions by their best to smear Schweizer, who serves as State Department.” the Clinton Foundation I’d direct you to the president of the Government Accountability foundation that does very important work Institute. That nonprofi t declares on its The Center for American Progress, founded around the world, but I don’t have a reaction website that its mission is “to investigate and by Hillary Clinton 2016 campaign manager to the letter.” expose crony capitalism, misuse of taxpayer John Podesta (who was also White House monies, and other governmental corruption Chief of Staff for President Bill Clinton), It’s no surprise that a Democratic adminis- or malfeasance.” Schweizer was previously attacked the book in a ThinkProgress blog tration would not be eager to criticize the a consultant to NBC News and the William post by Aviva Shen. Shen doesn’t write much party’s presumptive presidential nominee. J. Casey Research Fellow at the prestigious worth reading but she does point out that the But what’s clear is that typical Clinton cor- Hoover Institution.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA: Its Place in the 21St Century and The
    RUSSIA: Its Place in the 21st Century and the Implications for the United States The findings of a trilogy of panel studies by recognized experts A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org CONTENTS Introduction by Herbert London Study Group Briefing Agenda and Panel Participants Part One - Plenary Session Rapporteur’s Report by Peter Schweizer Part Two - Panel Reports I. Internal Issues Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Congressman Curt Weldon Cornerstone Paper by David Satter II. Foreign Policy Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Senator Fred Thompson Cornerstone Paper by Dr. Richard Pipes III. Security and Military Issues Panel Findings, Conclusions or Recommendations Remarks by Panel Chairman, Major General William Odom, USA, Ret. Cornerstone Paper by Dr. Keith Payne Part Three - Luncheon Address by The Honorable James Woolsey Further Suggested Reading on Russia and the United States For Additional Information on this Hudson Institute Project and Future Hudson Institute Events, See Contact Information on the Inside Back Cover. A Special Report of the U.S.-Russia Relations Study Group June l, 2001 Sponsored by Hudson Institute, Inc. http://wwww.hudson.org RUSSIA: ITS PLACE IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES A Report of the Hudson Institute Study Group on U.S.-Russia Relations Introduction By Herbert London Ten years ago we watched with near disbelief as the last great predatory empire, the Soviet Union, began to unravel before our eyes - and with scarcely a shot fired.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Page
    A12 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2017 ••• RICHMOND TIMES-DISPATCH EDITORIAL PAGE HEALTH CARE Contraction? Over the course of Virginia’s protracted dispute about expanding Medicaid, Republican opponents repeatedly have warned about getting stuck with a big bill the state cannot afford to pay. Looks like they could be right. Under the Affordable Care Act, states could expand Medicaid coverage at nearly no direct cost to them: After picking up the full tab initially, Washington would gradually lower its funding support, but only to 90 percent. Even after the full phase-in, every state dollar spent on expansion would bring a $9 return. Seemed like a sweet deal. Thirty-one states took it. Virginia didn’t, thanks to GOP opposition. Democrats have made much of all the supposedly free money the state has left on the table, but of course the money isn’t free: It comes from the taxpayers. What’s more, there is no giant pot of dedicated federal expansion money that Washington divides among however many states expanded Medicaid. Virginia’s decision not to expand Med- icaid does not mean Virginia’s share of the pie goes to other states. It means the money the commonwealth would have received sim- ply goes unspent. With a Republican — at least a nominal one — in the White House and majorities in Congress, the GOP is now considering various ways to unwind the Affordable Care Act. A few concrete proposals have surfaced, but a consensus has yet to coalesce. One bone of contention concerns Medicaid. Some Republicans LETTERS TO THE EDITOR in Washington want to roll back Medicaid expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfgram Memorial Library Mcnaughton Collection
    Wolfgram Memorial Library McNaughton Collection March 2020 - New Arrivals NOTES: Our McNaughton Collection delivers New York Times bestsellers to our patrons on or before street date, and are shelved by the author’s last name. Fictitious characters, series, or club names are in “quotes” for easy identification. Author - Title – Subject - Synopsis Cummins, Jeanine – American Dirt – “Oprah’s Book Club 2020,” Mexico Organized Crime Fiction, Mexico-U.S. Border Immigrants Fiction - Lydia Perez's life is not extraordinary; she is a bookstore owner with a husband and eight-year-old son, Luca, in Acapulco. When cartel jefe Javier Fuentes has her entire extended family killed while Lydia and Luca are fortuitously hiding in a bathroom, Lydia realizes they must leave Mexico immediately or be killed when Javier finds out she is still alive. Luca, confused but trusting in his mother, embarks with her on an odyssey to the north, joining other migrants trying to make it to the U.S. border. What they see along the way will bring readers both heartbreak and hope, pain and promise. While Cummins alternates points of view, Luca's voice in particular sings with innocent optimism in the face of a series of near misses. The journey towards the prospect of safety is not only that of Luca and Lydia but of many other migrants, and complex secondary characters serve as both warnings and signs of possibility. Beautiful, straightforward language drives home the point that migration to safer places is not a political issue but a human one. With a story line sure to be much discussed this election year-- plus a film in the works--American Dirt may be the don't-miss book of 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohammed Al Amoudi Response to Schweizer 'Clinton Cash'
    www.sheikhmohammedalamoudi.info SHEIKH MOHAMMED The Global Office of Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi HUSSEIN AL AMOUDI 16 June 2015 official website FACT SHEET Sheikh Mohammed Al Amoudi’s Response to ‘Clinton Cash’ On May 5, 2015, HarperCollins published a book by Peter Schweizer (Clinton Cash) which made a number of inaccurate, incomplete and/or false statements about Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi. The following details the corrections related to the section on Sheikh Al Amoudi, which are found on pages 128-134 in Chapter 8 of Clinton Cash. 1. Amount of Donation to the Clinton Foundation Mr. Schweizer states that Sheikh Al Amoudi made a $20 million commitment to the Clinton Foundation in 2007. While it is true that Sheikh Al Amoudi committed to that sum in principle, he in fact only donated $6 million to the Clinton Foundation. He then provided a further $16 million for a separate event - the Sixteenth International Conference on AIDS and STI in Africa (ICASA 2011). Interested parties are referred to the Sheikh's personal website - www.sheikhmohammedalamoudi.info - for more information on his philanthropy and on his longstanding interest in African healthcare issues as well as the facts on the Clinton Foundation donation and ICASA 2011. All of this is explained on the Sheikh's website. 2. False Claims Derived from Suspect Online Letter Mr. Schweizer relied for some of his 'facts' on a purported 2009 letter from an otherwise unknown "Ethiopian human rights organization" (Ethiopian Americans for Justice). The allegations raised in the letter were highly unreliable. In particular, the letter, without any factual support or basis, claimed that the donation to the Clinton Foundation was made at the behest of the Ethiopian Government and that the Sheikh 'is not known for much philanthropy.' This purported organization has no website and no mailing address.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Cash Peter Schweizer
    Clinton Cash By Peter Schweizer Summarized by cleangov [If we lived in a country with an ethical government, the Justice Department would have long since put a stop to activities like those described in this book. Bill and Hillary Clinton and many of their close associates, and many of the wealthy people who donated money to various Clinton causes, would be serving long prison sentences. The actions and policies of our government would be saner and would be productive of improved conditions at home and abroad. The US taxpayer would have kept more money in his pocket, to spend on projects he thought were worthwhile. But, that’s not the case. We do not have an ethical government, so books like this are needed, so that the electorate, or at least enough of them, can wise up to the huge crimes being committed by people in positions of trust, and can rise up and vote the rascals out. This summary is an effort to present in a succinct form many of the fascinating facts connected with the Clintons and their solicitation of huge payments of money to their Clinton Foundation and other organizations of benefit to the Clintons, (or huge speaking fees paid to Bill Clinton by wealthy individuals, corporations, and foreign individuals or countries), in apparent exchange for favorable laws or rulings or policy decisions made by Hillary, or greatly influenced by Hillary, (or favorable introductions of Bill’s business pals), when she was Senator from New York, and then Secretary of State. As Peter Schweizer says in a couple places in his book, given that he is only an investigative journalist, with very limited investigatory powers, the data presented here is not (usually) sufficient to convict anyone of a crime in a court of law.
    [Show full text]
  • 16044390532.Pdf
    BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION American Democracy Legal Fund 455 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 fi-:' s.t» Complainant,. V :51 • • V. •- <-} Senator Rand Paul to' P,0. Box 77681 Washington, DC 20013 4 Rand Paul for President, Inc. P.O. Box 77681 Washington, DC 20013 MUR # Treasurer of Rand Paul for President, Inc. P.O. Box 77681 Washington, DC 20013 Peter Schweizer 195 Broadway New York, NY 10007 HarperCollins Publishers 195 Broadway New York, NY 10007 Respondents. COMPLAINT Complainant files this complaint under 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(1) against (i) Senator Rand Paul, (ii) Rand Paul for President, Inc., Senator Paul's authorized campaign committee, (iii) the treasurer of Rand Paul for President, Inc., in his. or her official capacity, (iv) Peter Schweizer, and (v) HaiperCollins Publishers for violating the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act") and Federal Election Commission regulations, as described below. LEGAL12581S031.1 A. FACTS Senator Rand Paul is a United States Senator from Kentucky seeking the Republican nomination for President of the United States.' Recently, Senator Paul received an exclusive briefing on an upcoming book, Clinton Cash, by the book's author, Peter Schweizer.^ Clinton Cash, which is being published by HarperCollins Publishers and scheduled to be released on May S, 2015, investigates foreign donations made to the Clinton Foundation, a foundation formed by former President Clinton and his wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.^ Secretary Clinton is currently seeking the Democratic nomination for President of the United 1 States and thus, is a potential opponent for Senator Paul in the general election on November 8, 2016." ^ Throughout his presidential campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-- 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
    ...u _ jreDERALELECTION COMIVHSSION . .... -2-- 999 E-Streetj N.Wr " ^ - - 3 Washington, D.C. 20463 ra r-5 <-i 4 o i'O 5. FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT m to CO •r— •<- 6 i-.1 "1 >O 7 MUR: 6938 s 8 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: May 13,2015 O 9 DATE OF NOTIFICATION: May 21, 2015 «» 10 DATE OF LAST RESPONSE: July 27, 2015 11 DATE ACTIVATED: September 3, 2015 12 13 EXPIRATION OF SOL: March 25, 2020 14 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 .15 16 COMPLAINANTS: American Democracy Legal Fund 17 18 RESPONDENTS: Rand Paul for President, Inc. and Paul Kilgore 19 in his official capacity as treasurer 20 Senator Rand Paul 21 Peter Schweizer 22 HarperCollins Publishers LLC 23 24 RELEVANT STATUTES 25 AND REGULATIONS: 52 U.S.C. § 30101(8) 26 52 U.S.C. §30116(a)(1)(A) 27 52 U.S.C. §30118(a) 28 52 U.S.C. §30118(b)(2) 29 11 C;F.R. § 100.52(d)(1). 30 11 C.F.R. § 106.4(b) 31 11 C.F.R. § 110.1(b) 32 .33 INTERNAL REPORTS CHECKED: Disclosure reports 34 35 FEDERAL AGENCIES CHECKED: None 36 1. INTRODUCTION 37 On March 25, 2015, journalist and author Peter Schweizer met with Senator Rand Paul to 38 discuss his upcoming book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign 39 Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, which was released to the 40 public in May 2015. The Complaint alleges that in doing.so, Schweizer made an excessive in- MUR 6938 (Rand Paul foi Presidentj Inc., et al.) First General Counsel's Report Page 2 of 9 : cohMbutibnrMd his .i5ublisher; HarperColliftS Rub'lishieTs'Tfia^^^ .a prphLbited'Conjwate ' —j-- 2 contribution to Paul and his presidential authorized campaign committee, Rand Paul for 3 President, Inc., by offering access to information that Paul then used to campaign against Hillary 4 Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Foia/P-2014-0219
    ' . .· .· · · FOINPA REQUEST q em No.: _ao 'JI@L_.... -s·te Rec'd' .•.. --.---.· 0 ~ ~t.<::f GOVERNMENT ~nst:. ~~---- ACCOUNTABILITY Related Case: ..:2Qli::.,9L2L­ INSTITUTE March 10, 2014 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ATTN: NRC FOIA/PA Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T -5 F09 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Freedom of Information Act Request Dear Freedom oflnformation Officer: Pursuant to the provisions of the Freedom oflnformation Act (FOIA), 5 U.S. C. § 552, Peter Schweizer and the Government Accountability Institute hereby request that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, produce the following within twenty (20) business days: 1. Any and all non-privileged records that are related to the application, review, and approval of the purchase ofEnergy Metals Corporation by Uranium One, Inc. on or about July of 2007. 2. Any and all non-privileged records that are related to review and approval of the proposed sale of a controlling interest of Uranium One Inc. to ARMZ Uranium Holding Co. also known as JSC Atomredmetzoloto. 3. Any and all records of correspondence from Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ Uranium Holding Co. also known as JSC Atomredmetzoloto relating to the proposed 2013 transaction wherein JSC Atomredmetzoloto proposed to acquire 100% ofUranium One Inc. We call your attention to President Obama's January 21, 2009 Memorandum concerning the Freedom oflnformation Act, in which he states: All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure; in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA. .. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA. 1 1 President Barack Obama, "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Subject: Freedom of Information Act," January 21, 2009; <http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_ office/Freedom of Information Act.> T: 850.329.7259 W: www.g-a-i.org E: [email protected] P.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Introduction of Peter Schweizer Delivered by Rick Schwartz at the Complimentary Young America’S Foundation Luncheon June 5, 2018 the Westin, Cincinnati, Ohio
    SPEAKER INTRODUCTION OF PETER SCHWEIZER DELIVERED BY RICK SCHWARTZ AT THE COMPLIMENTARY YOUNG AMERICA’S FOUNDATION LUNCHEON JUNE 5, 2018 THE WESTIN, CINCINNATI, OHIO It is my privilege to introduce Peter Schweizer — a five-time New York Times bestselling author and president of the Government Accountability Institute. My wife, Jane, and I first met Peter back in 2008, on a Baltic cruise for donors and supporters of Young America’s Foundation. Both of us were impressed by his energy, his quick wit and his passion for the facts. I guarantee you’ll be impressed by those same things today. Peter is known for exposing corruption … defending the principles that make America great … and advancing freedom coast to coast. And it all started right here — at Young America’s Foundation. Because back in 1982, Peter attended a Foundation conference as a high schooler. There he was exposed to conservative books by Milton Friedman, Bill Buckley and others. And he discovered that books can do what articles and lectures can’t: They can influence a person over the long term. So after college, Peter started writing. Since then, he’s written more than a dozen nonfiction and academic books, all grounded in investigative research. Peter’s books have had a tremendous impact on policies in Washington … our young people … and all of us, as American citizens. His bestselling book “Throw Them All Out” led to Congress passing the STOCK Act, which prohibited senators and representatives from insider trading. “Clinton Cash” — a favorite of mine among Peter’s many books — reveals how foreign governments and businesses made Bill and Hillary Clinton rich.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disinformation Age
    Steven Livingston W. LanceW. Bennett EDITED BY EDITED BY Downloaded from terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997THE DISINFORMATION AGE https://www.cambridge.org/core Politics, and Technology, Disruptive Communication in the United States the United in https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms . IP address: 170.106.202.126 . , on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36 , subject to the Cambridge Core Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 27 Sep 2021 at 12:34:36, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/1F4751119C7C4693E514C249E0F0F997 The Disinformation Age The intentional spread of falsehoods – and attendant attacks on minorities, press freedoms, and the rule of law – challenge the basic norms and values upon which institutional legitimacy and political stability depend. How did we get here? The Disinformation Age assembles a remarkable group of historians, political scientists, and communication scholars to examine the historical and political origins of the post-fact information era, focusing on the United States but with lessons for other democracies. Bennett and Livingston frame the book by examining decades-long efforts by political and business interests to undermine authoritative institutions, including parties, elections, public agencies, science, independent journalism, and civil society groups. The other distinguished scholars explore the historical origins and workings of disinformation, along with policy challenges and the role of the legacy press in improving public communication. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. W. Lance Bennett is Professor of Political Science and Ruddick C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clintons, Crony Capitalism, and American Foreign Policy
    افغانستان آزاد – آزاد افغانستان AA-AA چو کشور نباشـد تن من مبـــــــاد بدین بوم وبر زنده یک تن مــــباد همه سر به سر تن به کشتن دهیم از آن به که کشور به دشمن دهیم www.afgazad.com [email protected] زبان های اروپائی European Languages http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2015/04/21/how-to-judge-a-political-candidate-2/ The Clintons, Crony Capitalism, and American Foreign Policy By Justin Raimondo April 23, 2015 The income stream of the Clinton Foundation, which includes many millions of dollars from foreign governments and individuals with close links to foreign governments, has created a firestorm of controversy. A forthcoming book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, by Peter Schweizer, contends that, during her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton granted favors and concessions to governments that were generous in their donations to the Foundation that bears her name. More than that, reporting published prior to the book’s publication shows that enormous speaking fees were paid to both Hillary and Bill Clinton by entities closely tied to these same foreign interests. The Washington Post informs us that Bill Clinton alone collected $26 million in speaking fees in his work on behalf of the Foundation. As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton was supposed to have filed full disclosure reports, and the Clinton Foundation was supposed to have forsworn donations from foreign governments during Mrs. Clinton’s tenure. The latter did not happen, and as for the former: there are huge loopholes in the disclosure rules, one of them being that, while sponsors of paid speaking engagements must be revealed, “sub-sponsors” are exempt.
    [Show full text]